Friday, April 30, 2010

Democratic Party, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Zionism, Inc.

Ask Haaretz: What drives ’secret’ US policymaking?
(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

From Haaretz, on the Israel lobby, its sociological roots. Why doesn't this stuff ever get exhumed here? Note the reference to money. The Washington Post has said 60 percent of Democratic giving. I guess that's not a story; and Jews and money is an antisemitic, pogrom-producing canard.
Until the midterm elections in November, U.S. President Barack Obama cannot permit himself a rift with Israel. Eighty percent of Jews vote for Democrats. The Jews of New York, California and Florida alone contribute 40 percent of campaign expenses. A clandestine battle is now being waged between Bibi and Obama as to when American Jews will tell Obama, who is putting on the pressure: "We've had it." But for all the covert contempt of our leftists, the Pentagon has no interest in weakening Israel.
...MORE...LINK

No explanation left for corrupt Washington's unconditional support for Israel other than a Devil's bargain with Judeo-Zionist supremacy

Freeman: Israel is useless to US power projection
(Mondweiss) -- by Chas Freeman --

The other day Stephen Maher published a piece on Electronic Intifada saying that American thirst for hegemony in the region, and not the Israel lobby, is the prime motivator of US policy in Israel and Palestine. What follows is an excerpt of a private email exchange responding to Maher's post, reprinted by permission of the author, Chas Freeman, a former assistant secretary of defense.

Maher's account is far from novel on any score but he is describing Japan's, the UK's, or Qatar's role in US strategy, not Israel's. A few facts to ponder when considering his assertion that Israel is a huge and essential asset for US global and regional strategy:

-- the US has no bases or troop presence in Israel and stores only minimal military supplies in the country (and these under terms that allow these supplies to be used essentially at will by the IDF).

-- Israeli bases are not available for US use.

-- none of Israel's neighbors will facilitate overflight for military aircraft transiting Israeli territory, let alone taking off from there. Israel is useless for purposes of strategic logistics or power projection.

-- Israel is worse than irrelevant to the defense of Middle Eastern energy supplies; the US relationship with Israel has jeopardized these supplies (as in 1973), not contributed to securing them.

-- US relations with Israel do not bolster US prestige in Middle Eastern oil-producing countries or assist the US to "dominate" them, they complicate and weaken US influence; they have at times resulted in the suspension of US relations with such countries.

-- Israel does not have the diplomatic prestige or capacity to marshal support for US interests or policies globally or in its own region and does not do so; on the contrary, it requires constant American defense against political condemnation and sanctions by the international community.

-- Israel does not fund aid programs in third countries to complement and support US foreign or military policy as other allies and strategic partners do.

Japan provides multiple bases and pays "host nation support" for the US presence (though that presence as well as the fact that Japan is paying for a good deal of it are growing political issues in Japan). The air base in Qatar from which the US directs air operations throughout the region (including in both Iraq and Afghanistan) was built and is maintained at host nation expense. So too the ground force and naval facilities we use elsewhere in the Gulf. The US is paid for the weapons and military services it provides to its European and Asian allies as well as its Arab strategic partners. Washington has never had to exercise a veto or pay a similar political price to protect any of them from condemnation or sanctions by the international community. Japan and various Arab countries, as well as European nations, have often paid for US foreign assistance and military programs in third countries or designed their own programs specifically to supplement US activities.

Washington has made Israel our largest recipient of foreign aid, encouraged private transfers to it through unique tax breaks, transferred huge quantities of weapons and munitions to it gratis, directly and indirectly subsidized the Israeli defense industry, allocated military R&D to Israeli rather than US institutions, offered Israeli armaments manufacturers the same status as US manufacturers for purposes of US defense procurement, etc.. Almost all US vetoes at the United Nations and decisions to boycott international conferences and meetings have been on behalf of Israel. Israel treats its ability to command support from Washington as a major tool of diplomatic influence in third countries; it does not exercise its very limited influence abroad in support of US as opposed to its own objectives.

As others have said with greater indirection than I have here, one must look elsewhere than Israel's strategic utility to the United States for the explanation of its privileged status in US foreign policy, iniquitous as Maher considers that policy to be...MORE...LINK

Sneaky Big Government/Big Pharma Jew Waxman secretly injects anti-vitamin provisions into Wall Street Reform regulation

Health freedom alert: Congressman Waxman sneaks anti-vitamin amendment into Wall Street reform bill
(NaturalNews) -- By Mike Adams --

Of all the sneaky tactics practiced in Washington D.C., this recent action by Congressman Henry Waxman (D-CA) is one of the most insidious: While no one was looking, he injected amendment language into the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009 (H.R. 4173) that would expand the powers of the FTC (not the FDA, but the FTC) to terrorize nutritional supplement companies by greatly expanding the power of the FTC to make its own laws that target dietary supplement companies.

This is a little-known secret about the FTC and the nutritional supplements business: The FTC routinely targets nutritional supplement companies that are merely telling the truth about their products. Some companies are threatened by merely linking to published scientific studies about their products.

For example, here's an important article that describes how to FDA criminally extorts money out of supplement companies: http://www.naturalnews.com/024567_h...

The FTC does much the same thing. They target a particular company that's having success in the natural products marketplace, then they accuse that company of "inferring" that their products have some health benefit. From there, the FTC demands that the company engage in paying a massive fine to the FTC, which the FTC calls "consumer redress" even though none of the money actually goes to the consumers.

If you try to fight the FTC, they haul you into their own special "FTC courts" which are not public courts where you have the benefit of a jury, but rather they are courts where the judges are actually FTC employees and you have no rights. You are essentially guilty until proven innocent, and virtually no one has been found innocent by the FTC.

If the King says you're guilty, then you're guilty

The FTC also forces you to sign a "consent decree" which involves you admitting to committing crimes that you have actually never committed. These crimes include the "criminal misrepresentation of a product" by, for example, explaining that walnuts help support healthy cholesterol levels or that cherries ease symptoms of inflammation.

Using these methods, the FTC has extorted tens of millions of dollars out of nutritional supplement companies. More importantly, it has terrorized the industry and put several companies out of business, denying the American public access to products that could improve their health and prevent disease.

Waxman wants the FTC to have even more power over your vitamins
Now Congressman Henry Waxman wants to give the FTC even more powers by allowing the FTC to write its own laws without Congressional approval. This would allow a rogue agency to simply invent any new law it wants, such as requiring nutritional supplement companies to spend hundreds of millions of dollars "proving" the efficacy of a vitamin before they can sell it.

This will allow the FTC to utterly circumvent DSHEA -- the law passed in 1994 that provides basic protections to vitamin and supplement manufacturers. This will result in an FTC war on vitamins and supplements that would no doubt see this rogue agency attempting to destroy the entire industry and imprison the founders and executives of all the top supplement manufacturers.

This is how bad things have become in America today: The criminal CEOs of drug companies are allowed to commit felony crimes, engage in routine price fixing fraud and fix their research with fraudulent clinical trials, yet the FTC and FDA do nothing. But when an honest nutritional supplement company says something like, "Walnuts are good for your heart," they get threatened with imprisonment or have their entire life savings stolen away from them by the FTC through a series of "fines."...MORE...LINK

Waxman: Seeks to keep country drugged up on Big Pharma at gunpoint of Big Gov.

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

"Never Again!" or "Never Enough!"? Will people like this ever be satisfied short of WWIII?

Feeling the Hate in New York
(YouTube.com) -- by mblumenthal --

Max Blumenthal presents part three in a running series: 1500 Jewish extremists rally on 4/25/10 in Midtown Manhattan against President Barack Obama's call for an Israeli construction freeze in East Jerusalem and demand unlimited rights to colonize the occupied Palestinian territories...LINK

A Jew identifies other Jews as swindlers looting America, but immediately goes into melodrama mode about the implications

James Howard Kunstler Worries about Jewish Behavior
(Occidental Observer Blog) -- By Edmund Connelly --

I’ve written before that I get a kick out of the writing of blogger and author James Howard Kunstler. And I love to observe how he twists and turns worrying that the goyim his fellow Jews are mocking and fleecing will finally wake up and take a swat at their tormentors.

A week ago, April 19th, he really let his fears of the goyim show, so much so that I began a blog about it. As things do, a few days led to a week and now we have another Kunstler blog. And he continues to sweat about “the white trash elements” that are catching on to what slick city Jews are doing to America.

For instance, he reported last week that a fellow named Litowitz ran a scam that defrauded, among others, the Thrivent Financial for Lutherans Foundation. I’ll let readers work out the ethnic trappings of that story for themselves.

Now, here’s what I really like. First, Kunstler will outline an obvious problem:
How is it not a racket to deliberately and systematically construct investments designed to fail so you can collect what amounts to insurance against them — and then to sell those financial instruments to customers without telling them that these investments were engineered to blow up? At the very least it amounts to a failure to disclose material information, which is the basis for distinguishing illegality. More to the point, it almost certainly amounts to prosecutable criminal fraud and insider trading.
Then he’ll allude to the presence of so many of his fellow Jews involved in the schemes, someone like former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, who then went on to head Citicorp, which lost 70% of its value under Rubin. As a consequence, Kunstler reports, Mr. Rubin was paid $17 million in 2008 and received $33 million in stock options.

This week his column may be even more revealing. He builds his tale on a phrase uttered by then-President George W. Bush, “This sucker could go down.” Kunstler parses the meaning of the phrase, concluding that it means the whole schmeer, this “rather creaky vessel we call modern civilization.”

And he again points the blame at the Jews (well, it’s mostly Jews): “a banking system that is running a hostage-and-ransom racket on civilization.”

Allow Kunstler to expand in his own words:
This sucker is going down because the train of bankruptcies underway has a remorseless self-reinforcing power to provoke more and more bankruptcies at every stop along the line as every promise to pay is welshed on. The mortgages will not be paid and securities will not pay their investors and the banks will choke on the bad paper promises in their vaults and the pension funds will not pay their beneficiaries and the states and counties and municipalities will go broke and not pay their employees and creditors, and the federal government will not be able to “print” new money in sufficient quantities fast enough to compensate for all the money not being paid up-and-down the line… and one morning we will wake up and discover that all those promises to pay were sham promises based on no productive activity whatsoever… and that will be a sad day. Perhaps the Dow Jones Industrial Average will hit 35,000 on that day.
And make no mistake; Kunstler knows it is members of his Tribe, whom he blandly and ineffectually tries to attack: “How come no political figure of any stripe has called for the resignation of Summers, Rubin, Gensler and other Goldman Sachs ‘sleepers’ infesting high levels of government.”

Next, according to script, he turns his wary eye on the victims of all these high-level scams, and he describes those victims in his typical disdainful way:
Animosities brewing as they are among the white trash elements of the country, I just hope this sucker doesn’t resolve into an ugly bout of attempted ethnic cleansing. Certainly Obama’s racial make-up has inspired a revival of the Ku Klux spirit around the NASCAR ovals. I’m sincerely worried that the misdeeds of people name Blankfein, Rubin, and Madoff could provoke a red-white-and-blue pogrom.
Ah yes, the infamous “cornporn Nazis” of Kunstler’s overactive imagination. And he’s right to bring up ethnic cleansing, except that he’s doing the typical Jewish tactic of projecting Jewish intentions and actions onto the actual victims. As in the Communist Soviet Union, it is ethnic White Christians who are enduring the attempted ethnic cleansing. Honestly, how many American Jews have even been physically smacked around because they are Jews? Meanwhile, the Whites who built the country are being dispossessed by massive non-White immigration and other tactics.

Still, I give Kunstler credit for consistently bringing up Jewish roles in this earth-shattering financial meltdown. It’s far more than we get from the dying Mainstream Media...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

Kunstler essentially bitches like hell about a Jewish culture of organized thievery, but then immediately turns around and starts insulting anyone inclined to identify and hold it accountable as "white trash" likely bent on irrational "pogroms."

Jews with any kind of conscience or good will (which may or may not include Kunstler) are put in an impossible position by the gist of Jewish leadership, which as far as I can tell knows its running a massive swindle (as epitomized by Zionism) with the banksters as merely one arm of the group's entire racket, but pretends to act shocked and dismayed when its swindles are identified and criticized.

Did Kunstler not get the memo, or is he really that naive? Did it really never occur to him that the reason organized Jewry always has one eye on the door is not because it has always been irrationally persecuted, but because its swindles have always brought heaps of contempt down upon its own head that many times spilled over into bloodshed?

Even though Gypsies and Jews are running similar rackets (albeit the Gypsy’s on a relatively trifling scale) I have much more respect for Gypsies because when they’re finally caught, they simply move along, whereas Jewish swindlers adopt an affectation of injury and outrage that anyone would dare to accuse “the Chosen” of subscribing to anything other than the highest moral and ethical standards. The indignant pose must be an integral part of the scam.

I suspect that authentic original Jewish religious texts, when held up to a certain light, must all contain the imprint of a winking eye at the close of any paragraphs advising moral scruples in dealing with Gentiles.

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Outrageous Israel-first ultimatum put to Obama by Schumer and other Jewish nationalist "Americans" in US Congress

Sen. Chuck Schumer Slams Obama's Policy toward Israel
(You Tube) -- By FreedomsLighthouse —

Here is video of New York Democrat Sen. Chuck Schumer talking to a Jewish radio show - the Nachum Segal Show- where he blasted the Obama Administration's policy toward Israel as "counter-productive," and said it "had to stop."...LINK

"Revolution Muslim" group "threatening" South Park is a black op created by Jewish settler and propagated by (Jewish) left-lib Jon Stewart

The “Radical” Muslim Group That Threatened South Park Creators Was Founded and Run by Joseph Cohen, a Former Israeli Radical Who Used to Live in a Settlement in the West Bank
(American Everyman) -- by Scott Creighton --

Jon Stewart, go fuck yourself. You’re a propaganda spewing puppet and you’re no better than Glenn Beck.

South Park ran an unedited image of Muhammad in 2001 in an episode called “Super Best Friends“… and nothing happened.

In fact, the episode had been on the South Park website for viewing at any time for the past few years (they just removed it)… and nothing happened.

For 4 seasons they had that image in their opening segment for every single show… and nothing happened.

So for years on end no Muslim group, “radical” or otherwise, has threatened Matt and Trey or Comedy Central about the image of Muhammad that has been available for all to see every single day.

All of a sudden last week a group called “Revolution Muslim” threatened violence against Comedy Central if they aired an image of Muhammad which forced Comedy Central to censor the show and now you have even liberals talking about those “radical Muslims” and their threats of violence. Karl Rove couldn’t have done it any better.

Problem is, Revolution Muslim was started and run by a “converted” Israeli settler who studied at an orthodox rabbinical school in Israel before becoming a settler in the occupied territories.

You don’t think a orthadox Israeli settler would have any desire to see progressive Americans start to hate “radical Muslims” do you? You think “Revolution Muslim” helps or hurts the Israeli PR campaign after Operation Cast Lead and the Goldstone Report?

Here’s the research your team should have done before you went out and spun-up the neoconish ”radicalized Muslim” hype for your progressive audience…

“Revolution Muslim” is always there to say just the wrong thing to make Americans hate “Radical Muslims”. They praised the killing of Daniel Pearl with a childish puppet show. They sent “Get Well” wishes to the guy who shot those 13 people at Fort Hood...

But the only thing is… “Revolution Muslim” (his creative fake “Scary American Terrorist” website) was started and ran by a man named Yousef al-Khattab. Yousef al-Khattab was born Joseph Cohen, in Brooklyn, New York. He was jewish. But not just jewish, he was a settler who went to Palestine to live on the illegal Israeli settlements.

I find it funny that after being born and raised as a jewish person, after attending orthodox rabbinical school in Israel, and after being radical enough to move to occupied territories in Palestine to live as a settler (the most hard-core of Israeli Zionists), ALL OF A SUDDEN Joseph Cohen dropped all of that teaching and suddenly became a “radical Muslim’ after a chat in a chat room. He became a “radical Muslim” then just HAPPENED to move back to the city he lived in before… Brooklyn, N.Y.

Anybody believe that shit? Jon Stewart does. So much so he mocks “radical Muslims” for threatening South Park.

Now, go here and watch Jon Stewart joke and make derogatory comments about the group that threatened the creators of South Park for showing the image of Muhammad on their recent show. Then he thanks all the “other” religions for not behaving like the “Radical Muslims” did when Stewart makes fun of their religion...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

Related:

False Flag Outrage
(by xymphora) --

The latest brouhaha over South Park was just an advertising campaign to raise awareness of a dying brand - still a good cartoon show though - over a phony controversy concerning two episodes that wouldn't have offended anyone who wasn't a member of an iconoclastic religion that worships Santa Claus. Needless to say, threats arose from a website purported to be run by Islamists, but which was really a false flag front created by a Jewish settler named Joseph Cohen to make Islam look bad. Some idiot 'artist' named Molly Norris tried to make this into a free speech issue (and is now distancing herself from the commotion), and the American knuckle-dragging right, in league with the geigh Dan Savage (another dying brand), is trying to create yet another campaign to advocate making fun of the religious beliefs of the more poor and oppressed to allow the rich and powerful to feel rich and powerful (and drop more bombs on the poor and oppressed). I wonder if the hipsters doing the will of the Jews and their usual allies, the hateful American extreme right, will ever realize they've been punked by the combination of a big corporate advertising campaign and the trickery of a settler...LINK
--------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

Rich hipster left-liberals and Jews "making fun of the religious beliefs of the poor and oppressed to allow the rich and powerful to feel rich and powerful (and drop more bombs on the poor and oppressed)."

Sounds like what went on here in the West when the Jewish Bolsheviks and Stalinists were systematically murdering Christians in the Soviet block countries...making fun of Christians and throwing tantrums about those "horrible and intolerant" anti-Communists.

American left-liberals are easily as stupid, depraved and blinkered as right-wing dispensationalists, but even more dangerous, because at least some of the right-wingers are incredulous when it comes to Big Government. The liberals are like idiots lining up in a queue outside what they think is an amusement park, but is in reality a rendering plant.

That's right, just keep gorging yourselves with candy, popcorn and endless episodes of South Park and other Jewish Hollywood trash. You're almost inside the gates of the "amusement park." Oh, what fun it'll be!

Saturday, April 24, 2010

And you thought left-socialist Dems couldn't learn to love right-wing Bushcons; Meet Chuck "the bridge" Schumer and the Jewish Zionist liberals

Israel’s ‘guardian,’ Sen. Schumer says Gazans are suffering but they deserve it
(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

Ben Smith picks up a disturbing radio interview of Chuck Schumer by Nachum Segal, who is apparently to the right of Schumer and of course has influence, in which Schumer repeatedly sides with Israel over Obama and says the collective punishment of the Palestinian people in Gaza is tough luck. Notice Schumer's claim that all Americans share his feeling, but the contradictory statement that it's "Jewish members" of Congress who will be meeting Obama to stand up for Israel. Oh my. Amy Goodman, please run for Congress. Notice that Schumer has Obama's ear and brags of spending lots of time with Netanyahu. And you thought Democrats couldn't learn to love a rightwinger. Read the comments at Politico and you will see that people ain't buying, the American street is enraged by Schumer's allegiances...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

I guess the Statist left-liberal socialists have far more in common with the national socialist neocons and dispensationalist Buschons than they ever imagined. But then again, don't the forces of coercion, Statist authoritarianism and evil always eventually coalesce out of political necessity as more and more of the average decent people grow wise to their nature?

Conscience-stricken lefties, try to look on the bright side and think of it as the dog days of the Hitler-Stalin pact as the two were dividing up Poland before their partnership went awry. Only in this case, the Zionist progressives and the Zionist neocons and dispensationalists will be shaking hands over the corpse of Palestine.

Enjoy the carcass, because it won't be long before you're choking on it, you sociopathic ***holes.

From Big Business Corporatists to Big Government "progressives," corrupt US establishment coalesces around Jewish supremacy

End Israel lobbies’ pervasive and damaging influence in US politics
(Redress) -- By Debbie Menon --

...Key elements of the US government have always opposed the concept of a Zionist Israel, ever since the state and defence departments advised President Harry Truman not to sign up to the Zionist project, which he nevertheless did but with reservations, qualifications and conditions that were immediately ignored.

But none of these key elements of governance has influence over the Zionist-controlled US corporate press, entertainment, academic and public (mis)information media (and the corporate and business advertising budgets that drive them) where the roots of American public opinion are planted and from which the blissfully ignorant American masses take the cues for their views and feelings. Nor do they control the free-spending lobbies that buy and sell legislators and politicians on Capitol Hill with the same ease with which they trade banks and corporations on the stock market.

While this is well documented, the sad thing is that today many editors, journalists, analysts and publishers, even in the so-called progressive American media, either still do not know these facts or have chosen not to inform the public about them.

Recent “hate speech” legislation in the US Congress has already eviscerated the freedom of speech guarantees of the First Amendment. Try to persuade me that abuse and vilification of Islam and Christianity will get you the same treatment in the courts that open and objective political criticism of Israel will. The fact that it will almost certainly not is a perfect example of the power of lobbies in controlling the law of, and restricting free speech in, the USA.

The recent 300-36 vote by the US House Representatives rejecting the UN-sponsored Goldstone Report, and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)-initiated letter “Reaffirming the US-Israel Alliance”, which was signed by 76 senators and pressed the US president not to put pressure on Israel – and repeated the “unbreakable bond” mantra – is the best evidence of who controls US Middle East policy and how powerless the US president is to serve his own country’s interest. Barack Obama would do well to heed George Washington’s advise, when he warned in his farewell address against “passionate attachment” to an ally. (Also see Anthony Lawson’s video, “Treason by Members of the United States Congress”.)

Yes, it is about this ally’s powerful lobbying and its pervasive influence on American politics, policy and institutions that these and other writers have long written valuable books, revealing facts about the extent of the stranglehold of the Israel lobby over the US Congress and the US administration.

It’s long past time to end one of the most damaging and pervasive cover-ups in the US today, and time for people and institutions to confront Israel’s lobbies...MORE...LINK

Does Kevin MacDonald want to "exterminate" Jews, or does organized Jewry want to eradicate Whites, Christians and Western civilization?

Lawrence Auster Gets Unhinged
(Occidental Observer Blog) -- by Kevin MacDonald --

I made a resolution to not to waste time and energy on Internet squabbles with people like Lawrence Auster. Auster’s agenda is pretty clear. As I said in some previous comments on him, “ Auster’s comments, posted on his website, are first and foremost an attempt to place me beyond the realm of legitimate discourse. By titling the article ‘The idiocy of Kevin MacDonald,’ Auster is saying, “Don’t go near MacDonald—he is off limits.” Auster continues to draw lines, now trying to anathematize anyone who is remotely associated with me.

For awhile, it seemed that Auster had decided not to bother with any arguments at all. His complaints about my review of Norman Podhoretz’s Why are Jews Liberals? referred to “MacDonald-style Jew-hatred” and then had long quotes from the article. Not exactly an overwhelming argument.

Now Auster has taken to calling me an “exterminationist anti-Semite,” again with the aim of drawing boundaries for acceptable discourse and again without much of an argument:
Since Kevin MacDonald sees the Jews as a group that are genetically determined by Darwinian evolution to subvert and destroy white gentile societies wherever they encounter them, in the same way that rattlesnakes are genetically determined to sink their venomous fangs into the flesh of mammals wherever they encounter them, we must conclude that he doesn’t want Jews to exist in America and Europe. Further, as I explain here with regard to MacDonald’s recent article at Alternative Right, it is clear that he doesn’t want Jews to exist in Israel either. So MacDonald doesn’t want Jews to exist anywhere.

If anyone has a reasonable interpretation of MacDonald other than that he is an exterminationist anti-Semite, I’d like to hear it.
There is a whole lot wrong with this, starting with interpreting me as saying that “Jews as a group that are genetically determined by Darwinian evolution to subvert and destroy white gentile societies wherever they encounter them.”

I certainly do think I have shown that Jews have a powerful sense of groupness. This is apparent throughout history and can be seen today in pretty much any statement put out by organizations like the ADL. And I do think that there are conflicts of interest between Jews and non-Jews in a wide range of areas — my writing has focused on immigration policy, policy toward Israel, and the construction of culture generally. Whenever I discuss these issues I always qualify my remarks by noting that not all Jews hold the same opinions. Making a case for Jewish influence is a matter of looking at where the great mass of Jewish money and influence is being brought to bear and trying to determine if their efforts are effective. For example, in the case of immigration policy, it matters little if Auster and Stephen Steinlight oppose our anti-White immigration policy when the organized Jewish community and the vast majority of Jews (including a great number of Jews with influential positions in the media) are in favor of it. (Here’s a recent example: the ADL condemning the Arizona law that attempts to rid the state of illegal immigrants.) My argument is that Jewish influence was a critically necessary condition for the passage of the disastrous 1965 immigration law.

But this is a far cry from saying that Jews are “genetically determined by Darwinian evolution to subvert and destroy white gentile societies wherever they encounter them.” Even a casual reading of my work would show that it’s all about culture–why else write a book titled The Culture of Critique. (This is a recent academic version of my theory of culture.) Genetic determinism plays no role in my theory.

When it comes to why the organized Jewish community and most Jews have supported policies that oppose the interests of people of European descent, I implicate Jewish ethnocentrism combined with their lachrymose view of their own history among Europeans — summarized in my review of Podhoretz. Briefly stated, Jews have a historical grudge against Europeans and their culture...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

MacDonald: "It really doesn’t matter if groups with little power and influence oppose the interests of White Americans. But it matters greatly if a substantial component of the elite in terms of wealth as well as political power and media influence opposes our interests and brings to economic ruin and political oblivion anyone (Jew or non-Jew) who comes to our defense."

Chris Moore comments:

I would echo this point, but add "Christianity/Western civilization" to "White Americans."

Auster has had his panties in a twist ever since Paul Gottfried recently outed him as a crypto-Jew trying to pass himself off as a Christian on Alternative Right.

Auster's leap from MacDonald's rational critique of subversive organized Jewry to a claim that MacDonald advocates their extermination is a typically Jewish supremacist hasbara technique designed to categorize any serious and intelligent critics as beyond the pale -- in this case, not only MacDonald, but anyone who publishes him (specifically, Richard Spencer, the publisher of Alternative Right, who is supposedly part of "the Paleocon anti-Semite complex").

Jewish supremacists like Auster believe that Jews (like himself) should be allowed to declare open season on Christians, Muslims and whites who defend themselves against Jewish attacks, but never have to hear any kind of reply. This is a corollary to the same state of mind and attitude of liberals and multi-culturalists, who picked up the characteristic from Jews to begin with. Anyone who defends themselves against their rhetoric and "authority" is extreme, racist, murderous, etc.

Auster demonstrates that any tenacious Zionists or neocons of any stripe can never be trusted to put the interests of Whites, Christians or Western civilization over the interests of the Tribe. In any conflict between the two, they'll always revert to Marxist techniques and declare their foes to be bigots motivated by bad will and a desire to exterminate a "vulnerable" minority.

-----

Someday [in comments]: "Jews would be fools to believe any movement that includes those who imply Jews are inherently evil is not “exterminationist anti-Semitic” or likely to become so at the drop of a hat. Some writers on TOQ need to make it clear what they do not mean."

Why isn't it incumbent upon organized Jewry, given its ancestry as "Stalin's Willing Executioners," and given the fact that so many of those murderous Communist Soviet and E. European Jews emigrated to America and Palestine, and given the fact that their techniques once here and there have resembled a slow motion version of their techniques in the Bolshevik Soviet Union, "to make it clear what THEY do not mean"?

Why do Christians, whites and adherents of Western civilization have to "prove" that they mean no harm to organized Jewry, yet organized Jewry, with so much Christian blood on its hands (and a similar although thus far less murderous track record in Palestine), is the presumed moral authority which can sit in judgment and declare who is "approved" to lead or even participate in “civil society” and discourse, and who is not?

I'll answer my own question: because the game is rigged by organized Jewry and its corrupt and morally depraved collaborators.


@jkr: “the vast majority of jews are innocent victims of their own leadership just as the vast majority of westerners today are victims of their own selfish leadership”

There is some wisdom in what you say vis-à-vis Western leadership, although I disagree that the vast majority of jews are innocent victims.

It takes two to tango, and most of organized Jewry has gravitated to the absolute worst and most venal of its leadership time and again out of opportunism moreso than fear. It was that way in the early Soviet Bolshevik era, and it’s that way today.

For example, the vast majority of American Jews have no reason whatsoever to support Zionism in terms of their personal fear factor, yet they have fallen into line with the Zionists nonetheless -- despite at this point in time the overwhelming troves of evidence that Zionism is rotten to the core. Why? Because the Jewish Zionist network is a richly rewarding place to be, professionally and financially, just as early Soviet Bolshevism for Jews was.


“jews have led a precarious and highly (psychologically) regimented existence for many centuries”

But that’s the point, isn’t it? If they haven’t embraced Christian and Western Free Will doctrine by now (which only seems to enrage them and which they have consistently and conscientiously rejected) they never will. To this day, with the exception of handfuls of individual Jews, they are almost universally unwilling to take responsibility for their own actions and deeds. Instead, they use Western freedoms to further entrench their “victim” identity and consolidate power. And via a kind of intellectual jujitsu employing Statist Marxism, socialism, left-liberalism, neo-conservatism and dispensationalism, they’ve actually managed to pivot Western civilization into the corner and are now leveraging corrupted Westerners against it.

It’s ingenious, really, but in no way the work of a “victim.” It’s the work of a long-game aggressor. And it’s organized Jewry that demands a fight to the death whenever it attains massive power, not the other way around.

At this point, the only “enlightened” way out for Western civilization if it is somehow able to rally and gain the upper hand that I can see is extreme containment in Israel.


-------------------------
Related:
Stalin's Willing Executioners

...Although in the decades immediately before the Russian Revolution Jews had already made enormous advances in social and economic status, a major contribution of Slezkine’s book is to document that Communism was, indeed, “good for the Jews.” After the Revolution, there was active elimination of any remnants of the older order and their descendants. Anti-Semitism was outlawed. Jews benefited from “antibourgeois” quotas in educational institutions and other forms of discrimination against the middle class and aristocratic elements of the old regime, which could have competed with the Jews. While all other nationalities, including Jews, were allowed and encouraged to keep their ethnic identities, the revolution maintained an anti-majoritarian attitude. (Some might argue that the parallel with post ’65 Civil Rights Act America ironic!)

Beyond the issue of demonstrating that the Jews benefited from the Revolution lies the more important question of their role in implementing it. Having achieved power and elite status, did their traditional hostility to the leaders of the old regime, and to the peasantry, contribute to the peculiarly ghastly character of the early Soviet era?

On this question, Slezkine’s contribution is decisive.

Despite the important role of Jews among the Bolsheviks, most Jews were not Bolsheviks before the Revolution. However, Jews were prominent among the Bolsheviks, and once the Revolution was underway, the vast majority of Russian Jews became sympathizers and active participants.

Jews were particularly visible in the cities and as leaders in the army and in the revolutionary councils and committees. For example, there were 23 Jews among 62 Bolsheviks in the All-Russian Central Executive Committee elected at the Second Congress of Soviets in October, 1917. Jews were leaders of the movement and to a great extent they were its public face.

Their presence was particularly notable at the top levels of the Cheka and OGPU (two successive acronyms for the secret police). Here Slezkine provides statistics on Jewish overrepresentation in these organizations, especially in supervisory roles, and quotes historian Leonard Shapiro’s comment that “anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka stood a very good chance of finding himself confronted with and possibly shot by a Jewish investigator.”

During the 1930s, Slezkine reports, the secret police, now known as the NKVD, “was one of the most Jewish of all Soviet institutions”, with 42 of the 111 top officials being Jewish. At this time 12 of the 20 NKVD directorates were headed by ethnic Jews, including those in charge of State Security, Police, Labor Camps, and Resettlement (deportation).

The Gulag was headed by ethnic Jews from its beginning in 1930 until the end of 1938, a period that encompasses the worst excesses of the Great Terror.

They were, in Slezkine’s remarkable phrase, “Stalin’s willing executioners”...

Thursday, April 22, 2010

AIPAC is Israel-first; Obama is an AIPAC mouthpiece; Obama is an Israel-firster

AIPAC: The Voice of America — Part 1: The Orange and the Pea
(You Tube) -- alawson911's Channel...LINK

Contrasts in faith: Orthodox Christian Putin celebrates Easter, whereas left-liberal Obama celebrates...Hanukkah and Passover

The Difference Between Putin And Obama
(Real Zionist News) -- By Brother Nathanael Kapner --

A GREAT LEADER ATTRACTS GREAT PEOPLE AND HOLDS THEM TOGETHER,” said Von Goethe at the close of the 18th Century.

As we begin the 21st Century, two leaders in the public eye, Vladimir Putin, Prime Minister of Russia, and Barack Obama, President of the United States of America, are vying for world wide recognition. The difference between the two heads of state is strikingly dissimilar if not poles apart.

For instance, on April 4, 2010, Vladimir Putin brought his co-leader, Dimitri Medvedev, along with state photographers, to Easter Sunday services in Moscow, joining 4 million Russians in celebrating the nation’s holiest day of the year.

Following the service, Putin and Medvedev appeared on National Television to “congratulate” the Russian people for “celebrating the Resurrection of Christ.” View Entire Story Here & Here.

By contrast, Barack Obama did no photo-ops on Easter Sunday…no speeches. But rather, Obama brought a cadre of journalists and photographers on April 1, 2010, to a White House Jewish Passover Seder, complete with a myriad of his Jewish staff.

Hailed as “the first Presidential Seder in America’s history,” by Haaretz and declared a “new tradition” to be observed for years to come in the White House by the New York Times, Obama joined Jewish advisers, David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, Eric Lesser, Susan Sher (Michelle Obama’s counsel), and Herbie Ziskend, a staff assistant to Vice President Joe Biden, to celebrate the Jewish rite. View Entire Story Here & Here. Full Seder Photos Here & Here.

As Goethe pointed out, a great leader holds people together. Vladimir Putin is doing this very thing in a resurgent Christian Russia, whose Christian roots and heritage of many generations are being reestablished in that nation’s cultural and religious life.

But in America, a ONCE CHRISTIAN nation, Obama has forsaken America’s heritage. Instead, Obama brings a Hanukkah Menorah to the White House lawn during Christmas and a Jewish Passover Seder to the Oval Room during Easter...MORE...LINK

Obama Treasury official "setting the trap on Iran" is an AIPAC stooge

Treasury officials are sure cozy with Israel lobby
(Mondoweiss) -- by Jeff Blankfort and Phil Weiss --

Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, "Setting the Trap on Iran:"
The next step in this pressure campaign is the sanctions regime being crafted by Stuart Levey, undersecretary of the Treasury for terrorism and financial intelligence. This will have several interlocking components: The showpiece will be a new U.N. Security Council resolution to add sanctions against the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and its affiliated companies, along with other Iranian firms involved in manufacturing, transporting and financing weapons shipments and other illicit activities. But that's just the beginning.
Now here is Levey, speaking before an AIPAC policy conference in 2005, and doing some Israel sign-language:

To start, allow me to first introduce my office. I am the Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial and Intelligence, or "TFI." TFI is a relatively new office. It was created in 2004 to oversee the Treasury Department's enforcement and intelligence functions aimed at stopping illicit money flows to terrorists and other criminals....

It is a real pleasure to be speaking with you today. I have been an admirer of the great work this organization does since my days on the one-year program at Hebrew University in 1983 and 1984. I want to commend you for the important work that you are doing to promote strong ties between Israel and the United States and to advocate for a lasting peace in the Middle East....

We all remember the Munich Olympics and Leon Klinghoffer and Pan Am 103 and Entebbe and Maalot and so many more. We all knew all along that terrorist groups could not be reasoned with or negotiated with, and that they sought nothing but destruction. As President Bush articulated in his address to you last year, "[Terrorists] kill without mercy. They kill without shame. And they count their victories in the death of the innocent."

You can imagine, then, how meaningful it is for me to play a role in this Administration's efforts to combat terrorism. I start off every morning reading the daily intelligence book, and then spend my day working to undercut the supply-lines of terrorist groups. It is, quite honestly, exhilarating. I often feel like the baseball players I used to watch growing up who, when asked about salary issues, would say "Are you kidding?? I get paid to do something that I love. I would do this for free."...
...Is it really that surprising that Levey hangs on from Bush into Obama? Both the New York Times and the Washington Post must have an unwritten policy in which identifying any member of the administration or a Washington think tank with the pro-Israel forces is not allowed. Ignatius is not an ignorant reporter so his failure to identify Levey for what he is, an openly pro-Israel supporter serving in a critical position in the US government, must have some other reason...MORE...LINK

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Rabbi Boteach: More and more Gentiles connecting the dots on cancerous Jewish greed, materialism

Rancid materialism is corrupting our community
Many of us rabbis are either afraid to speak out or have been bought off.
(Jerusalem Post) -- By Rabbi Boteach

The Jewish community better get serious about the cancer that's growing inside it. The devastation on Wall Street carries a lot of Jewish names, from firms like Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers to individuals such as Bernard Madoff, whose $50 billion Ponzi scheme collapsed over the weekend, and lawyer Marc Dreier, arrested last week for defrauding investors of hundreds of millions of dollars. On the Internet more and more people who don't like us are beginning to connect the dots, pointing out that there are an awful lot of Jews who bear responsibility for Wall Street's fall...

...what if some if it is true? What if our community has become too obsessed with money? What if our values have become about wearing the most expensive Cartier watch and driving a suped-up Mercedes? What if a disproportionately large number of young Jews are running to work on Wall Street and never even considering jobs like teaching, the rabbinate, or doing outreach because the compensation, comparatively, stinks? FOR TOO long the Jewish community has excused all manner of material excess so long as those who sported giant jewels and enormous gold watches also gave lots of tzedaka (charity). It is true that Judaism has always said that riches are a blessing because they enable one's resources to be used for the benefit of others. We reject the New Testament statement that the rich will find it harder to get into heaven than a camel passing through the eye of a needle. But tzedaka is not the only Jewish value...

And yet the materialism in our community has become rancid. I was sitting with a group of rich Jewish businessmen the other day who were talking about a friend's son's bar mitzva in which an NBA superstar made a guest appearance for which he was paid an insane amount. Indeed, bar and bas mitzvas have become for many a game of million-dollar one-upmanship. Now, what kind of values are being communicated to these young people on the occasion of becoming responsible members of our community? That life is about showing off? Do we want our kids ending up as the insecure social climbers who joined the exclusive Jewish country clubs where word went out that being part of Bernard Madoff's investment fund was a privilege reserved for a chosen few and that they better beg to be admitted? I SEE a lot of Jewish people walking around these days with a red string on their wrists. Popularized by the Kabbalah Center, it's supposed to ward off the eiyan ha'ra, the evil eye. The original Jewish concept of the evil eye was based on the idea of not flaunting wealth so as not to incur the jealousy of those less fortunate. It was based on the beautiful Jewish value of human dignity, of not making people less successful feel bad about themselves. What was once a message of humility and simplicity has now been transformed into one in which it is permitted to sport a ten-carat diamond so long as it is accompanied by a silly piece of string...MORE...LINK

Supremacist liberal and Statist Jewish-Americans have no problem with their own ethno-nationalism, but go to war when it’s Christian or white

Settling Scores
(Alternative Right) -- By Paul E. Gottfried --

Lest someone [Lawrence Auster] misrepresent what I've said about Jews and Israel, let me restate the positions that I've taken more often than I care to recall.

I am not (repeat not) against the Jewish state of Israel. I have apparently upset some readers by suggesting that Israeli sympathizers in the U.S. and in Europe should recognize the equal right of Euro-Americans to have their national identities. If preserving an ethnic national character is good for Jews, it should be equally so for Poles, Russians, Frenchmen, Germans, and Danes. Like the German philosopher Herder, I believe that the spirit of nations is reflected in their epic literature, customs, and political traditions; peoples have a right and even a duty to preserve their national character, as long as it is not asserted aggressively against other countries or aimed at demeaning national minorities that happen to reside in one's land. Needless to say, a respect for minorities does not extend to allowing alien groups to enter and occupy one's country. There is nothing undemocratic (if democracy is understood in its pre-multicultural and pre-managerial state form) about controlling immigration in accordance with national interest. This interest should take into account cultural compatibility as well as economic need...

Ironically Jews, who are often misrepresented as the most easily adaptable minority group because of their professional successes and role in the cultural industry, bring lots of baggage with them. Noting this may be useful and is not in any way an expression of hate. Although I don't accept entirely his tendentious survey of Jewish history over the last 4000 years, I nonetheless agree with MacDonald's demonstration of the cultural and political role of Jewish elites in contemporary Western societies. I also agree with his judgment that Jewish influence has pushed both national parties as well as the conservative movement toward the left...

Let me confess to one thing my critics have laid on me. I have, indeed, denied something that is so patently stupid that I can hardly imagine any intelligent person believing it. The assertion that Jewish liberalism has nothing to do with Jewish self-awareness or Jewish concern about living among Christians is a declaration worthy of a cretin -- or a Jew in very bad faith. Like my Irish Catholic students and colleagues, whose families still agonize over the Potato Famine and Yankee prejudice, Jewish liberals take their liberal positions for specifically ethnic reasons. MacDonald has marshaled a wealth of quotations in The Culture of Critique that substantiate this point. Have my critics, many of whom live in New York, never run into Jewish liberals ranting about the anti-Semitic Religious Right and about those who want to return to a "Christian America"? I've been noticing such people since my preteen years.

This does not mean that being a liberal in alliance with the multicultural Left is always in the long-range interest of Jews who are trying to preserve a separate ethnic identity. But it does mean that Jews who identify with the liberal Left (as opposed to the neocons) believe they are protecting themselves against an historic enemy, who is still out to get them. As for the alleged incompatibility between liberalism and the pursuit of Israeli interest, my critics should take up this point with Abe Foxman, the leaders of AIPAC, Rahm Emmanuel, Chuck Schumer, Alan Dershowitz, Arlen Specter and Joe Lieberman. There are lots of culturally leftist Jews who are nonetheless passionate advocates for Israel. Although these liberals may not embrace the Zionist cause with the same abandon as my critics, it would be foolish to describe them as anti-Israeli...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

Gottfried: "As for the alleged incompatibility between liberalism and the pursuit of Israeli interest, my critics should take up this point with Abe Foxman, the leaders of AIPAC, Rahm Emmanuel, Chuck Schumer, Alan Dershowitz, Arlen Specter and Joe Lieberman."

Auster is obviously trying to be more ideologically consistent in his Zionism than these political schizos, who have no problem with tenacious ethno-nationalism when it's Jewish (whether as manifested in Israel or as AIPAC), but throw a tantrum when whites and Christians organize ethnically or nationally, and are consistent in their racist desire to dilute the white vestiges of Western civilization in America via open borders (although I suspect greed and left-liberal politics plays an important role in their calculations as well.)

But nonetheless, it never takes guys like Auster long to play the anti-Semitism card, too -- a very neocon characteristic that has been readily picked up by dispensationalists, (not to mention Communists, socialists and left-liberals, who have been playing it since the early Soviet era).

Does Auster not know that the “anti-Semitism” label was a means for Communist marginalization and eventual extermination of Christians in Stalinist Russia, or does he simply not care?

Updated:

Conflating “asians, hispanics, muslims, Africans” with “wealthy Jews who subsidize the SPLC” (and presumably their Jewish Zionist and dispensationalist cohorts) as Jupiter does [in article comments] above, is actually doing the work of the U.S. co-opting/colonizing Jewish-American Zionists for them. It creates an “us” (all of those listed above) against “them” (a few white nationalists) mentality in the overwhelming majority of Americans who aren’t white nationalists.

Is there any better recipe for failure than that?

The real juxtaposition should be “us” (all America-firsters, Christians, advocates of Western civilization, lovers of freedom and liberty, defenders of a melting pot America that embraces the values and spirit of our founding documents, and hard-working anti-Communists of all races) vs. “them” (Israel-firsters, Jewish Zionists, dispensationalists, authoritarian Statists of Left AND Right and tribalistst in the vein of AIPAC, La Raza and the Black Caucus).

If they study the issue closely, Americans will find that greedy elite, white dispensationalists (Dick Armey, for example) are often as “open borders” as their Jewish partners for purposes of corporatism and lowering American wages, whereas many patriotic blacks and Hispanics want the borders sealed to drive up the price of labor.
See:

Chaos theory, open borders and tribalist-supremacism: The Leftist and neocon war against a Western Civilization-based America
And
How dumb and greedy Big Government GOP, working hand in hand with shrewd Marxist Dems, engineered its own demise

Anti-Semites here, anti-Semites there, anti-Semites everywhere! "The Paleocon anti-Semite Complex"

The Paleocon anti-Semitic Complex
(View From The Right) -- by Lawrence Auster --

On the basis of new information, I said last night something I had never said before--that the reason Peter Brimelow has persisted all these years, despite so much protest from his readers, in publishing Paul Craig Roberts's depraved, hate-filled columns was not (as he had told some readers) because he had a personal debt to Roberts and couldn't "hurt" the poor old fellow, and it was not (as he had told other readers) because he had paid for Roberts's syndicated columns and therefore had "no choice" but to publish everything Roberts wrote, the demented garbage along with the more reasonable pieces. No. The reason is much simpler and less counterintuitive than that, and it has been staring us in the face all this time. Brimelow publishes Roberts's depraved, hate-filled columns because he likes them.
Now a reader with inside connections offers further information on the shared beliefs of Richard Spencer, Richard Hoste, and Peter Brimelow.

UPDATE: In an exchange with a commenter who says that it is not correct to equate Roberts, who is not an ideological anti-Semite, with Hoste and Kevin MacDonald, who are, I explain what I mean by "Paleocon anti-Semitic Complex."

UPDATE: Since it directly connects with this entry, I am copying the relevant part of my comment here.
I wrote:

These people, like the members of any group, have different views and do not all fit into the same mold. They have a mix of views with sufficient overlap that they form a working ideological faction. The title of an entry I posted tonight, "The Paleocon anti-Semitic complex," conveys that idea. It's a complex, not a simple unity. Some of the members of the complex are merely anti-neocon. Some are anti-Israel. Some are outright anti-Semitic. What do these three views have in common? Opposition to people and entities that are identifiably Jewish. While not all members of the complex are anti-Semitic, opposition to Jews, and thus, ultimately, anti-Semitism, is the cement that holds the various parts of the complex together, and is even its ruling principle. This is shown by group's tacit hierarchical order, in which the members of the complex who are anti-Semitic are never criticized by other members for their anti-Semitism, while the members of the complex who are not anti-Semitic tacitly accept the anti-Semitism of their colleagues and don't complain about it, or at least they don't seriously do so. In many cases the non-anti-Semites defend their anti-Semitic confreres from the charge of being anti-Semitic. It would appear then that a minimal requirement for membership in the complex is, in descending order of activism, at least one of the following: (a) active defense of anti-Semitic members from the charge of anti-Semitism; (b) deference to anti-Semitic members and their anti-Semitism; or (c) silent non-criticism of anti-Semitic members and their anti-Semitism. While active support for, or at least silent non-criticism of, anti-Semitic members is a required condition of membership in the complex, criticism of members' anti-Semitism is prohibited, and marks an individual as a non-member of the complex.

Anti-Semitism is thus the organizing idea of the Paleocon anti-Semitic Complex, affecting and controlling even those members who are not themselves anti-Semitic...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

Lawrence Auster, the proprietor of View From The Right, is supposedly a Jewish convert to Christianity. However, given his preoccupation with anti-Semitism, either the conversion didn't take, or he actually converted to dispensationalism, which has nothing whatsoever to do with the teachings and philosophy of Jesus Christ in world view, outlook, or ethos.

The question that should be put to any Jew who "converts" to dispensationalism is: "Why bother?" The question that should be put to any Christian who embraces dispensationalism is: "Shouldn't you just convert to Judaism?"

--------------------------
Related:
"I was never fully American. I was Jewish."
(You Tube) -- posted by MossadDid911...LINK

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Collective sociopathic narcissism? Organized Jewry demands to be simultaneously singled out as special but overlooked on its atrocities

Symbolic Identifiers and Jewish Stereotypes
(gilad.co.uk) -- By Gilad Atzmon

Jews are usually proud to define themselves as Jews. Some Jews may, for instance, proudly carry the Jewish banner (Jews for Peace, Jews for Justice, Jews for Jesus and so on) as if they believe that the ‘J’ word contains special righteous attributions. However, they also will be gravely offended if they are called a ‘Jew’ by others. Suggesting to a Jew that “he is a Jew” or “behaves like a Jew” can be regarded as a serious ‘racist’ offence...

On the face of it, it would seem as if Jews are over sensitive to the ‘racial’ discriminatory implication of the ‘J’ word. However most Jews are not that concerned when being associated collectively with some great minds, adorable violin players or conductors. In short to safely apply the ‘Jew’ category, you just have to make sure you say the right things. No one will ever cause you any trouble for mentioning Albert Einstein in reference to Jewish intelligence or even bringing up Anne Frank as an exemplary motif of Jewish innocence but you may get into some serious trouble once you mention the following list of real and fictional characters: Bernie Madoff, Fagin, Wolfowitz, Lord Levy, Shylock, Alan Greenspan, Netanyahu and Nathan Rothschild without even identifying them as Jews.

All of the above depicts a very obscure, yet far from surprising picture. As it seems, Jews, largely do not mind stereotypes or collective categories. They do not mind racial generalizations and essentialist stigmas as long as they are positive.

Fagin Vs Anne Frank

It occurred to me recently that by juxtaposing Jewish stereotypes (those Jews seem to hate versus those Jewish ethnic campaigners try to promote) may throw some crucial light over issues to do with Jewish collective identity. It would also suggest to us how Jews might see themselves and even more importantly, it may also help us to grasp how they prefer to be seen.

It is rather obvious that some Jews are rather unhappy with Charles Dickens’ Fagin and Shakespeare’s Shylock who they regard as ‘anti Semitic’. I get the impression that the prominent Zionist enthusiast and London Barrister Anthony Julius would like to see these cultural iconic characters diminished from popular discourse. On the other hand, the British Holocaust Education Trust (HET) already managed to plant Anne Frank within the British curriculum.

It doesn’t take a genius to gather why Julius and others are concerned with Fagin or Shylock. Fagin is the ultimate plunderer, a child exploiter and usurer. Shylock is the blood-thirsty merchant. With Fagin and Shylock in mind Israeli barbarism and organ trafficking seem to be just other events in an endless hellish continuum. However, it is also obvious why the HET is so thrilled by Anne Frank. On the face of it, and for obvious reasons, Frank is there to convey an image of innocence. And indeed not a single moral system could ever justify the ordeal this young girl went through along with many others.

Yet, Anne Frank wasn’t exactly a literary genius. Her diary is not a valuable piece of literature. She wasn’t an exceptionally clever either. She was in fact a very ordinary girl and this is exactly her power within the post WWII Western cultural discourse. She was just an innocent average girl. In fact, the attempt to make Anne Frank into a cultural hero may be a genuine reflection of the Zionist inclination towards sameness. Frank mirrors the desperate Zionist attempt to prove to the world that ‘we the Jews’ are people like other people. Moreover, the success of Anne Frank’s Diary is there to suggest the West’s willingness to accept Jews as people amongst peoples.

Yet, once again, the Jewish discourse is caught in a limbo. Jewish people can never achieve their task. They can never be like ‘other people’ for no other people aim to be like other people. In fact, those who demand to be seen as equal must feel inherently and categorically different...

In his latest book Trials of The Diaspora, Anthony Julius renews his attack on those whom he labels as ‘anti Semites’ for being anti Zionists. The problem with anti Zionism, says Julius, is that “it denies the Jews the right that it upholds for other comparable people, it adheres to the right of self determination except in the Jews’ case...

For Hasbara (propaganda) to win a debate and for Julius to win his argument, Jews have to prove that they are truly the same rather than demand to be seen as similar. Surely Julius must know that winning a moral argument is very different from winning a court case.

Presumably Julius is familiar enough with Kant’s ‘categorical imperative’ that suggests that to behave ethically is to ‘act in such a way that the maxim of one’s actions can be willed as a universal law’. Julius may fail to grasp that ethnically cleansing the vast majority of the Palestinian population cannot be ‘willed as a universal law’. Locking millions in concentration camps such as Gaza is not exactly a maxim of profound ethical standing. Dropping white phosphorous on people hiding in a UN shelter doesn’t make the Jewish state look like every other state. In fact, it doesn’t make Jews look like other people either. Watching Jewish lobbies around the world push for a war against Iran doesn’t make Jews look like ordinary people. And this is something that even Anne Frank cannot change...MORE...LINK

Wow, there sure are a lot of Jewish names involved in the looting of America. That's why its essential to...BOMB THE MUSLIMS!

The Muslims Who Are Looting the USA From Within
(Goon Squad) --

Just look at this list of al Qaeda types who are sucking the life out of the USA from their perch in Goldman Sachs!

There's Lloyd BLANKFEIN, Chairman and CEO. And Gary COHN, the COO and President. David VINIAR, CFO and Executive VP. John WEINBERG, Vice-Chairman. Alan COHEN, Executive Head of Global Compliance.

Some of GS's 'notable' alumni are former Treasury Secretary and current Obama financial advisor Robert RUBIN. Robert ZOELLICK, former deputy Secretary of State and current World Bank president. Jim CRAMER, BS artist extraordinaire and host of "Mad Money."

Yes, it's these kind of Muslims who are devoutly stealing America blind, looting our wealth from within, bringing this country to its knees.


Crime does pay

Put the fix in at your Wall Street Casino, selling worthless MBS and CDO's, then place bets that those instruments will fail, which is a good bet, since you know they're junk to begin with and walk away with trillions.

Have the SEC stage a Stalin like show trial and maybe, maybe get fined a 100 million or so.

Steal several trillion and get fined a 100 million? Not bad for a few months worth of work.

It's these kind of Muslims that are destroying our nation from within, not some 'al CIA duh' clowns run by the CIA and the MOSSAD. These jihadists have declared financial war against the USA and are winning, aided and abetted by their stooges in our corrupted Congress and their shills running for the presidency.


Goldman Sachs Bribed Senate To Pass Bailout Bill

How much bribe money does it take to transfer $700 Billion taxpayer dollars to Wall Street's elite?

GOLDMAN SACHS CONTRIBUTIONS:

Obama, Barack (D-IL) $691,930

Clinton, Hillary (D-NY) $468,200

Romney, Mitt (R) $229,675

McCain, John (R-AZ) $208,395

Himes, Jim (D-CT) $114,748

Giuliani, Rudolph W (R) $111,750

Dodd, Christopher J (D-CT) $105,400

Edwards, John (D) $66,450

Specter, Arlen (R-PA) $47,600

Emanuel, Rahm (D-IL) $32,950

Reed, Jack (D-RI) $30,100

That's the 'official' list of campaign contributions. It's anyone's guess how much they received under the table...MORE...LINK

Monday, April 19, 2010

Which is it, "Judeo-Christian" Western civilization, or "anti-Semitic" Western civilization?

Neocon identity project: they will always hate us, because we’re Jews
(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

Here is an important exchange. Recently Jerry Muller, a Jewish professor of history at the Catholic University in D.C., published a splendid book called Capitalism and the Jews. Muller argues that Jews are great at commerce because of cultural training, family habits and dedication to texts, as well as from the tradition of filling a marginalized role in Europe, as usurers. Then capitalism became the defining order of European society in the 19th century, Muller says, and nationalism rose hand in hand with capitalism, because capitalism required literacy and education and nations could provide the structure for such development; and Jews became elevated within those nations as the professionals, and anti-Semitism was the response of people who lost status or who were in competition with Jews. It is a vital argument because it understands anti-Semitism as a real if hateful response to real sociological shifts, including the role of Jews as intermediaries between landowners and peasants in Eastern Europe (a hobbyhorse of mine) and follows along in the work of Yuri Slezkine, The Jewish Century, and Albert Lindemann--Esau’s Tears, which also “explained” anti-Semitism in terms of the rise of the Jews.

Now what is the exchange I began by referring to? At Amazon, the book was reviewed positively by Ira Stoll, the neoconservative former editor of the New York Sun. (I think this is the sage who said that those of us who demonstrated against the Iraq war in February 2003 should be investigated for “treason.”) But Stoll takes exception to some of Muller's analysis:
Mr. Muller gets out onto the thinnest ice when he blames Jewish involvement in revolutionary activity and communism for inflaming European anti-Semitism. Sometimes, he frames this claim cautiously: "To be sure, in much of eastern Europe anti-Semitism long antedated the Bolshevik Revolution, and would have been a substantial factor in interwar politics even without the prominence of Jews in the Communist movement."

Other times he is more assertive: "In Germany, where political anti-Semitism had been on the wane before 1914, the role of the Jews in the postwar revolutions was the key element in the revival of anti-Semitism on the right."

That the Jews were being denounced as greedy capitalists at just the same time as they were being denounced as dangerous Communists suggests to me that the denunciations were, at bottom, more about hating Jews than about hating either capitalists or communists.
I.e., they hate us because we are who we are, they hate us no matter what we do. When actually Muller shows that Jews were drawn both to capitalism and anti-capitalism, and that revolutionary ideology clearly played a role in the Nazi stigmatization of Jews in the 30s. But no, any theory that seeks to associate anti-Jewish hatred and crime with an actual grievance must be expunged.

This is in the end a war over Jewish identity right now. If nothing we do has anything to do with the resentment against us, we can continue to run the Israel lobby in American foreign affairs and colonize and ethnically-cleanse Palestinian lands and, when Obama demurs, insist on having out the disagreement behind closed doors, because the goyim will hate us anyway and the lobby is the only power we have.

But if we actually have an effect on our own reputation we can be mindful of our presence in a multicultural world. And I would state, as Muller does historically, that we have tended to be a privileged group...MORE...LINK
------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

The neocon Stoll recites a common Zionist trope with this argument:

"That the Jews were being denounced as greedy capitalists at just the same time as they were being denounced as dangerous Communists suggests to me that the denunciations were, at bottom, more about hating Jews than about hating either capitalists or communists."

This ignores the fact that both Communism and hyper Capitalism (as opposed to free enterprise) are antithetical to Christian moral authority and Western harmony -- which is a major reason many Jews are drawn to each. In both cases, the goal of these Jewish subversives is to tear down a society that penalizes their ethnic collectivism and racketeering, and replace it with a construct advantageous to themselves and their ways. True, Soviet Communism eventually turned on the Jews when the Jewish Bolsheviks became too powerful and were basically on the cusp of turning the entire enterprise into a mere Zionist (Jewish supremacist) front (just as they have done with American hyper-Capitalism). But it must be remembered that Jewish supremacism was probably the primary original motivation and secret intent of many of the Jewish intellectuals who invented Communism to begin with -- either consciously or sub-consciously.

Also, note how the neocons speak out of both sides of their mouth depending on who they're talking to. On the one hand, when addressing gentile audiences and issues, they preach the sanctity of the "Judeo-Christian civilization," and hold forth on how we're joined-at-the-hip-allies embarking on a common cause with common values in the War on Terror and clash of civilizations war on Islamic extremism. On the other hand, when addressing Jewish questions and issues, they go on and on about how Western civilization has always hated and persecuted Jews simply for being Jews, with no rational basis whatsoever.

So which is it, Judeo-Christian Western civilization or anti-Semitic Western civilization? Their tenacious support and intrigue on behalf of Zionism indicate which the neocons truly believe, hence I would argue that the last person a gentile Westerner would ever want to be in a fox hole with is a Jew with mixed emotions and conflicting attitudes about whether or not he even wants to defend the innately "anti-Semitic" gentile next to him. In fact, the a gentile may be under as serious a threat from the Christian-hating Jew at his side as he is from the enemy trying to gun him down from the front.

The entire mindset is reminiscent of Netanyahu giving speeches in Israel on the indispensability of Zionism to the survival the Jewish people because of the virulent, irrational and irascible anti-Semitism of the gentile world on one day, and then lecturing that same gentile world on how it should shower ever more Judeophile welfare on the Jewish state, and fight ever more Judeophile wars for the Jewish state, the next day.

Chutzpah, thy name is Jewish supremacy!

Jewish faux conservatives and their bootlickers want to smash all tribes and subversives except the Jewish ones

Faux-Conservative Jews
(The Occidental Observer) -- By Edmund Connelly --

We Whites are in an increasingly perilous situation. More and more of our lives are at risk as the White percentage of the population declines worldwide. As Kevin MacDonald recently wrote about Anti-White Violence in South Africa, “A constant theme on this website is that Whites living in societies run by non-Whites are in physical danger. From the aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution to contemporary Africa, the lesson is the same: Loss of political power means murder and mayhem directed against Whites by minorities with deep historical grudges.”

Given the challenges we face, it would seem only prudent that we accept offers of help from others willing to carry water for our cause.

Except I would rather decline the “help” proffered by faux-conservative Jews.

For example, on paper radio show host and best-selling author Michael Savage (born Michael Alan Weiner) sounds good for our cause, as Wiki testifies:
Savage has summarized his political philosophy in three words: borders, language, and culture. Some, including Savage himself, have characterized his views as conservative nationalism, while critics have characterized them as "fostering extremism or hatred." He outspokenly opposes illegal immigration to the United States, supports the English-only movement and argues that Liberalism and Progressivism are degrading American culture.
An early Savage book from nearly twenty years ago, The Death of the White Male, sounded like its heart was in the right place, arguing that affirmative action was reverse discrimination

Savage’s big publishing break, however, came in 2003 when his book The Savage Nation: Saving America from the Liberal Assault on Our Borders, Language and Culture made it to the top of the NYTimes best-seller list. There he claimed to be saving us from a "homosexualized, feminized America" that is "unraveling the very fabric of this great nation."

Next came The Enemy Within: Saving America from the Liberal Assault on Our Churches, Schools, and Military which argues, among other things, that “the Left operates specifically to undermine God, country, family, and the military" and that liberalism is "either treason or insanity" or "a mental disorder." He also goes after immigration again, discusses "Hollywood Idiots," and claims that Ruth Bader Ginsberg's appointment to the Supreme Court was "akin to appointing the general counsel of the Ku Klux Klan to the bench."

Since this all sounds pretty good, what’s my beef? Basically, my beef is that Savage seems to me to fit into the mold of the controlled opposition. By that, I mean that the largely Jewish elite in America attempts to appease and distract Whites from successfully pursuing their best interests by co-opting a genuine White movement.

Someone like Rush Limbaugh perfectly fits the bill. He’ll hit many of the crucial issues that Whites embrace, but he will never get close to the core of the problem: Jews fomenting these anti-White movements.

The result is that Jews are prominent only on the left, but also on the (faux) conservative Right. I’m not even going to talk about the neocons. I want to talk about the culture warriors who are Jewish and have elbowed aside more genuine White activists like Pat Buchanan and the late Sam Francis.

Sure, Savage mocks a few Jews, prompting at least one group to call him a self-hating Jew. But does his oeuvre do anything to help us get to the Jewish core of this “culture of critique” that Savage only superficially attacks?

Here he gives his views on "Who assaulted the White race? Who set out to destroy the White people?" He blames four individuals, three of whom are Jews and all of whom are linked to the 1960s counterculture: Alan Ginsberg, Bella Abzug, William Kunstler, and Timothy Leary. But he never identifies them as Jews, and that's as far as his "analysis" goes — perhaps all one can expect from mainstream talk radio.

Another example of a Jewish faux-conservative is Bernard Goldberg. His book, Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News, is devilishly effective at feigning an attack on the problems of liberalism. Its real accomplishment, however, is that it lets Jews as Jews off scot-free. It creates the illusion of attacking the proper target but in fact leads readers off to pursue harmless remedies. Thus, Professor Connelly here will give Goldberg an “A+” for obfuscation.

This tactic has been necessary for the Jewish group evolutionary strategy, for it fends off the normal outrage of a dispossessed and mocked host culture. As Kevin MacDonald noted in the TOO Blog on the issue of Jewish loyalty to Israel, “This sort of subterfuge is central to Jewish efforts at influencing policy in a wide range of areas.”

The Jewish culture of deceit indeed.

One of the more sophisticated examples of Jewish faux-conservatism comes in the person of former radical David Horowitz, whose conversion book Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About the '60s is quite candid about Jewish behavior. His even more personal book Radical Son: A Generational Odyssey was one of the best insider views of the Jewish subversive mindset that I’ve read. It left me convinced that Horowitz to a large degree personally believes in his critique of Jewish thinking and behavior.

Be that as it may, it really does nothing to absolve his work from the charge of subterfuge — in this case on behalf of Israel and the wider war on Islam. His book Indoctrination U: The Left's War Against Academic Freedom, for instance, appears sincere in some parts in its attack on the Left. But for anyone wishing to look carefully, it is abundantly clear that the main point is to attack leftist critics of Israel.

I’ve been studying these Jewish faux-conservatives for some time now and am impressed with the way the mainstream media accepts them as authoritative, all the while going through the motions of labeling them as dangerous because of their “extreme” conservative views. In fact, however, they are all part of the game — members of the inner circle. And they can get away with far more than their Gentile counterparts...MORE...LINK

Our ruling elite: anti-white gangsterism, Jewish supremacy and wars for Israel = good; white consciousness in U.S. military = bad

Christopher Donovan: Military To Sniff Out ‘White Supremacists’, Potok Crows
(Occidental Observer Blog) -- By Christopher Donovan --

It’s one thing to realize that universities, the media and the government are largely controlled by those hostile to Whites. But it’s quite another to realize that even whites’ traditionally core institutions — like the military — have been infiltrated by the same people. Now comes word that the military is ready to sniff out “white supremacists” — not by tattoo, group affiliation or vocal pronunciations around the barracks, but by nothing more than Internet advocacy.

As the angry comments note, it’s pretty obvious that the military isn’t interested in non-White “supremacist” activity, like the Five Percenters, Black gang members who put up their graffiti in Iraq or Afghanistan, or Islamic radicals who actually do cause big problems within the military. “Supremacist”, you see, is a nasty-sounding word that only applies to Whites.

(What’s funny to me, as a side note, is how unavoidably “Aryan” the business of being a soldier is to begin with: young, mostly White men standing ramrod straight, saluting, obeying authority and trained to kill brown people. Right there, of course, you’ve got a big problem, and if these men weren’t advancing Israel’s cause, they’d be held in far lower esteem by the Jewish power structure — and during the Vietnam war, they were. You’d think that if there were a clean-cut, hate-filled White man looking to kill non-Whites, the military would be the perfect place for him. Seems a military made up of wishy-washy liberals wouldn’t be very effective — they’d throw down their weapons and surrender.)

What’s scary about this effort by the military is to read the comment of Mark Potok, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s white-hater in chief, who seems to take credit for the new policy.

He’s quoted: “The hope is that this clarifies that even advocacy of these kinds of ideas is not consistent with being in the military.”

Wow. Full-fledged thought control, right in front of us. Who is this man, who exercises such incredible power — over the entire armed forces, no less? What, exactly, qualifies him to police the thoughts of White servicemen and women? He wasn’t elected. He wasn’t appointed. He didn’t even enlist. And yet there he is...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

I'll say it again: organized Jewry is the most racist and entitled entity on the planet. It organizes tribally to gain the levers of control and implement social engineering and totalitarian government to impose its supremacist double standards, and then puts on an affectation of shock, injury, and outrage when Western whites (or Muslims, for that matter) start organizing tribally as well. It seems to believe that only it is entitled to racial collectivism, and other ethnic collectivists (historically whites in particular, but in modern times Muslims too) should be smashed by the leviathan states it constructs, at its beck and call.

This never ends well, for anyone.

Cracks forming between Israel-first elite of Democrat Party and its rank and file?

Israel is debated at California Democratic convention, Harman walks out in huff
(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

We often note the news that Democratic rank-and-file support for Israel is fading. Well, the California State Democratic Convention yesterday endorsed Congresswoman Jane Harman for reelection from a district around Los Angeles, but before it did so, Harman and her opponent, Marcy Winograd, both appeared before a progressive caucus at the convention, and argued Israel. The Fresno Bee calls the fight the "flashpoint" of the convention. Peggy McCormack, a delegate to the convention, says that the story will be covered today on Pacifica radio, KPFA, 10 am PST. Meantime, her report:

Jane Harman and Marcy Winograd managed to squeeze in a debate of sorts before a couple hundred Progressive Caucus delegates at the Democratic Convention. Marcy herself brought up Israel in order to distance herself from Harman. I never thought I'd hear a candidate talk about brutal occupation, lack of water, unnecessary continuous deaths and lack of democracy. Harman in response called Marcy an extremist who wants to get rid of Israel, and Marcy shot back with a democratic state from the Mediterranean to the Jordan River. This got a standing ovation. And, Harman stood up and said she did not go to the caucus to debate and strode out. Unbelievable...
...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
"Palestinian terrorist!" or just an immigrant caucus-goer sitting alone in the bleachers? Clueless "Jerusalem Jane" Harman wouldn't know

Friday, April 16, 2010

Have Zionist agents infiltrated the U.S. military to steer us on a course towards war with Iran?

More on Dual Loyalty — Dr. Lani Kass and Gen. Norton Schwartz(Occidental Observer Blog) -- By Kevin MacDonald --

Dual loyalty issues have once again arisen, this time in conjunction with Philip Giraldi’s astonishing essay on antiwar.com. Giraldi discusses the curious career of Dr. Lani Kass — formerly a senior military officer in the Israeli Defense Force, and now the senior Special Assistant to the Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force General Norton A. Schwartz. “Kass appears to have close and continuing ties to her country of birth, frequently spicing her public statements with comments about life in Israel while parroting simplistic views of the nature of the Islamic threat that might have been scripted in Tel Aviv’s Foreign Ministry.”

Giraldi notes that her appointment raises a host of issues, including the possibility that she is an Israeli spy and exactly how she managed to get security clearance. Given that the official policy of the Israeli government is to advocate a war with Iran, it is more than interesting that she has an important influence on US policy and that she is involved in Project CHECKMATE responsible for drawing up war plans. She is quoted as having what Giraldi characterizes as a “dismissive” comment on a possible war with Iran, and has the views on the Islamic threat usually associated with neocons.

The role of Kass in the Defense Department is at least as questionable as the role of Dennis Ross in the State Department. In fact, it would seem to be an even more clear-cut case because Kass was actually born and raised in Israel and rose to the rank of major in the IDF. Although she is a naturalized US citizen, she has doubtless retained her Israeli citizenship. It would more than a bit surprising if she did not retain an allegiance to Israel. And is there any evidence at all that she has allegiance to the US? When asked about possible war with Iran, she responded, “We can defeat Iran, but are Americans willing to pay the price?” — as if she is not an American...

We would certainly like to know the details of Schwartz’s ties with Jewish organizations and activist groups, as well as any ties that he has with Israel. (For example, Paul Wolfowitz has family members living in Israel.) The fact that Schwartz has hired Kass as his senior Special Assistant suggests that the taboo against discussing Jewish loyalty issues is so strong that they feel free to be entirely public about it. (There might be some sensitivity, however, since the Pentagon has removed Kass’s biography from its website.)

Nevertheless, a war with Iran would be very costly for the US and may well have huge long term implications for the region and the world. Surely if the government wanted to project the image that US policy was not being shaped by people with a strong personal ethnic attachment to Israel (as clearly happened in the war with Iraq), they would remove people like Ross, Kass, and Schwartz from any role in making policy...MORE...LINK

AIPAC student agents targeted UC Berkeley student government for "take over" just as their elders target US Congress

Why both with moral persuasion when you can just threaten to take over government… everywhere?
(MuzzleWatch) --

On March 18, UC Berkeley’s student senate voted 16 to 4 in favor of divesting from companies that profit from the Israeli occupation. A week later, in a move oddly predicted by AIPAC’s Jonathan Kessler at AIPAC’s policy conference, the vote was vetoed by the student senate president. (Students hope the senate will overturn the veto next Wednesday.)

When asked about fighting the Berkeley pro-divest initiative, Kessler said, “we’re going to make sure that pro-Israel students take over the student government and reverse the vote…This is how AIPAC operates in our nation’s capital. This is how AIPAC must operate on our nation’s campuses.” Kessler is at 3:58 in video below. Student elections are happening now at UC Berkeley and you can bet everyone’s looking for the AIPAC-Manchurian candidate, if such a thing exists...MORE...LINK

Zionist talking points (protocols) distributed at UC Berkeley to manipulate public opinion, stop boycott of Israel, prevent Jewish accountability

Anti-divestment talking points: Avoid the facts and claim victimhood
(Mondoweiss) -- by Adam Horowitz --

The following talking points were distributed on UC Berkeley's campus in the days leading up to last night's debate over divestment. Several sources on Berkeley's campus have confirmed that they had seen them on campus, and that they were adhered to closely by anti-divestment advocates during the debate itself.

Anti-Divestment Bill: Unifying Strategies for Our Jewish Community

The message: The bill is an attack on our Jewish community. It silences our voices.

DO include in your speech

**End your speech with "Don't Silence Me" This will have a powerful, unifying impact.**

Keep it very short, about a minute

Unfairly choosing a side, under false pretense, is to shut down a productive and meaningful discussion. This can only cause more tensions and conflict. It takes away OUR voice.

Make it personal, include personal experiences and emphasize feelings of personal attack.

BE EMOTIONAL. Don't be afraid to show how you feel (angry, sad, etc.)

There will always be dissenters; they don't represent the voice of the Jewish community.

WE are the voice of the Jewish community at Cal (can refer to all the Jewish student groups that are against the bill - which collectively represent over 500 Jewish students on our campus).

If the issue is so clear, why is it so divisive? This may be one of those occasions when it's not appropriate for you (the ASUC senators) to decide something for everyone on campus.

The Bill is out of context and based on questionable sources (no need to go into detail). Thus, the bill is in fact an attack on the JEWISH COMMUNITY.

An unjustified attack on Israel is an attack on my Jewish identity. It is attacking ME.

The ASUC and our university have been hijacked by an extremist agenda, through this bill.

A small group of partisans are trying to leverage the reputation of UC Berkeley for their own narrow political purposes. These partisans have NO concern for the bitter divisiveness they have caused on campus...

DO NOT include in your speech

DON'T mention that Israel is being singled out (don't mention crimes committed by other countries). Don't suggest divesting from other countries. It is a weak argument and implies that Israel has committed war crimes.

DON'T try to deconstruct the bill. DON'T focus on addressing the fallacies/specifics of the bill.

Instead, focus on how it is an attack on the Jewish community.

AVOID a debate on the Middle East. Supporters of the bill would like to argue on this platform...MORE...LINK