Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Another outed Zionist lech in meltdown? Muttering of conspiratorial “tactics,” Jewish Zionist A. Weiner defensive, angry on question of lewd tweet

From:
Rep. Anthony Weiner calling a CNN producer a Jackass

(YouTube.com) -- by GCrowdy --



Related:
Judeofascism file on Anthony Weiner

-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

Notice how fast-talking Weiner keeps trying to change the subject to his ostensibly crucial political and legislative position (as if he isn't just another bought-off political cog in leviathan's wheel), and refuses to answer whether or not he sent the lewd tweet even as the reporter keeps hectoring him to simply so "no" if he didn't. He then resorts to the classic Zionist trick of implying there's a conspiracy against him, hinting that someone hacked into his twitter account and sent the lewd tweet to make it look like it came from him, all in a "tactic" to sabotage the crucial role he's playing for the American people as a political stooge.

Again, as the reporters keep asking him, if that's what really happened, why doesn't Weiner simply contact the Capital police and report it as a crime? The guy is just another in a long line of fast-talking Zionist hustlers, scam artists and pathological liars attempting to pass themselves off as pillars of society.

Whether Israel-first Jewish Zionists or Israel-first Gentile Zionists, these people have the integrity, character and morals of an alley rat, yet attempt to hold themselves up as essential to the proper functioning of American society.

It would be laughable if they weren't so corrosive and poisonous to society all the way around.

Zionist Republicans open and eager Israel-first whores, whereas Zionist Dems want it hushed in front of the goyim

From:
Republicans Use Israel To Attract Jewish Voters — And Jewish Money

(Forward) -- by Nathan Guttman --

Washington — The potency of Israel as a wedge issue for Republicans going into 2012 was on full display when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu invited a small group of Democrats and Republicans to a first-ever joint meeting at Blair House one day before his May 24 speech to Congress.

During his high-profile congressional speech, Democrats and Republicans rose as one to applaud Netanyahu about 30 times. But at the smaller meeting, what was meant to be a show of bipartisanship ended as a war of words between the heads of the National Jewish Democratic Council and the Republican Jewish Coalition.

Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the newly appointed head of the Democratic National Committee, suggested at the meeting that both parties pledge not to raise the issue of Israel in a partisan manner. But an angry Matt Brooks, executive director of the RJC, responded the following day in a letter to Wasserman Schultz that her request, made in front of a foreign leader, was politically motivated.

“I understand that you would like to stifle debate in the Jewish community on these issues, but the RJC believes they are legitimate issues and part of a healthy and vigorous debate,” Brooks wrote.

Tense relations between President Obama and Netanyahu are raising concerns in both Washington and Jerusalem, but for political activists vying for Jewish votes, they could mean a new opportunity to sway the pro-Israel community.

At the recent annual gathering of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, pro-Israel activists found themselves courted both by Republicans critical of Obama’s Israel policy and by Democratic lawmakers seeking to distance themselves from the president. Democrats have brushed off Republican claims for potential gains in 2012 and pointed to the decades-long history of Jewish support for their party despite repeated attempts by Republicans to make inroads to the Jewish community. But the GOP believes there is a new opportunity for winning over some voters and — no less important — pushing big Jewish donors away from Obama’s re-election campaign...

For Democrats, the main potential concern as they look ahead to the presidential elections cycle is a lack of enthusiasm among Jewish voters and donors who, according to many estimates, make up more than half of the donations to the party’s candidates. A May 19 article in The Wall Street Journal reported that Jewish fundraisers and donors warned the Obama campaign that the president’s positions on Israel could cost him financial support. But Harris argued that the reality on the ground is different. “Maybe you can find a few people that are not pleased, but the numbers show a different picture,” he said.

One of those few displeased people is Israeli-born TV mogul Haim Saban, one of the biggest individual donors to the Democratic Party. In a May 24 interview with CNBC, Saban said that Obama should do more for Israel. Saban also stated he does not intend to contribute to Obama’s presidential campaign. “President Obama has raised so much money and will raise so much money through the Internet, more than anybody before him. And he frankly doesn’t, I believe, need any of my donations,” Saban said. He added, however, that he’d keep supporting Democratic congressional and senatorial campaigns.

“If there is a smell of tension, the sides will abuse it. No question about that,” said Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League...MORE...LINK

Fake "liberal" Jewish Zionist Dems’ intellectual ability to worm out of accountability for leading role in racist Zionism increasingly untenable

From:
Shame: 9 of 15 signers of intolerant Congressional letter on Goldstone are Jewish

(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

A challenge to Hendrik Hertzberg. This morning in the New Yorker he writes that Obama has been held hostage by "the political salience, actual and perceived, of certain Jewish and evangelical constituencies." Well, here is a congressional letter of a month back to UN Ambassador Susan Rice, calling on the United States to "introduce a resolution expunging the Goldstone Report from the official record of the United Nations." And who is signing this defamation of human rights and international law? 9 of the 15 signers are Jewish-- Weiner, Berman, Israel, Engel, Berkley, Schakowsky, Schiff, Nadler, Deutch. Several are very "progressive" ones at that. Yes there are conservative Republicans like Dan Burton, but if there is a problem, and we all know there is, shouldn't the New Yorker be taking on the intolerance in its own community? Don't east coast liberals have more influence over their own community than over that perennial bugaboo-- the community of evangelicals?...MORE...LINK

Jewry increasingly in spotlight worldwide, and in an unflattering light; (Is world finally awakening to Judeofascist menace?)

From:
What’s Up With the Jews?

(New York Times) -- by STANLEY FISH --

It’s been an interesting week or two for Jews. Mel Gibson’s new film, “The Beaver,” opens nationwide in theaters and Jews must decide whether to pay good money to see a movie starring someone whose father is a Holocaust denier, and who has himself vilified Jews in public. In Cannes, the Danish movie director Lars von Trier rambles on at a press conference about sympathizing with Hitler, being annoyed with Israel and admiring Hitler’s architect, Albert Speer. Next day he recants, but it’s too late; he’s declared persona non grata at the film festival.

Then there is Dominique Strauss-Kahn, a French economist and politician who was poised to become France’s first Jewish president, imprisoned at Rikers Island after being accused of forcing sex on a chambermaid at a New York hotel. (Strauss-Kahn has now moved to a very constrained “house arrest” while awaiting arraignment, if he can find a house.) Meanwhile, on May 11 this newspaper publishes the results of a Pew Forum study that shows 67 percent of Reform Jewish households in the United States making more than $75,000 a year; only 31 percent of all households hit the same mark.

Then there are a few older stories that linger on and add to the mix. Designer John Galliano is facing trial in France and has been fired by Dior because, in the course of a drunken rant in a bar, he said to someone (who was not in fact Jewish) “I love Hitler and people like you would be dead.” Bad-boy Charlie Sheen abused various substances, cavorted with assorted women and trashed hotel-rooms for years and nothing much was done about it until he spewed anti-Semitic remarks in the direction of the Jewish producer of his hit TV show “Two and a Half Men.” In a short time he was fired and his role has been given to Ashton Kutcher, raised Catholic, but now heavily into Judaism and Kabala.

And of course there is the story that will live forever, even after its protagonist dies, the story of Bernie Madoff (a Strauss-Kahn lookalike, or is it the other way around?) who perpetrated the biggest scam in history (will he replace Meyer Lansky as the chief exhibit in the bad-guy Jewish Hall of Fame?) and ruined thousands of people, many of them fellow Jews.

The thing about these stories is that they all point in (at least) two directions. Sheen, Gibson, Galliano and Von Trier have paid dearly for their transgression against Jews; but that fact has also had some muttering on about Jewish power and influence in Hollywood and the arts. (“You can insult any ethnic group and get away with it, except for the Jews.”) In the U.S. press and on some of the blogs, Strauss-Kahn is vilified as an elitist misogamist thug, but in France he is thought of as a victim of a political conspiracy and portrayed by some as a modern Alfred Dreyfus brought down just as he was on the brink of ascendancy to a position no Jew has ever attained.

The statistics that show Jewish households doing really well financially would seem to be good news for the Jewish community, but the Times story about the survey ended up featured on the Web site of Stormfront.org, where it was placed just below an advertisement for the latest David Duke video. The moral Stormfront draws is that “most honest people do not want to live off other people,” the latest installment of the very old accusation that Jews are parasitic blood suckers who infest and infect a society. The same thing has been said many times on many white supremacists Web sites about Madoff: “If one studies the history of the Jew, one will see how this race of vagabond parasites takes over a host and bleeds it dry as we are now being bled dry” (Vanguard News Network Forum).

So which is it? Jews are a success story, or Jews are a plague? Don’t mess with Jews, or blame Jews for everything in sight the moment you get drunk? Jews are victims (expulsions, pogroms, the Holocaust), or Jews are victimizers (rapacious bankers, shyster lawyers, land-grabbers and ethnic cleansers)? Jews are devils and sub-human vermin (a Nazi trope), or Jews are God’s chosen people?

The answer is all of the above and much more, for, as many before me have observed, the Jew as a cultural/ historical figure is oversaturated, which means that the meanings that accrue to him (or her, but mostly him) are in excess of any empirical record and accumulate like barnacles without any regard for the law of contradiction. Attitudes, especially negative ones, toward Jews flourish whether there are Jews around or not. Anti-Semitism survives in Poland even though most of its Jews have either fled or been killed. There is anti-Semitism in China, but few actual Jews...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

The reason there is a contradictory view of Jewry is because Jews generally break upon one fault line: Judeofascists (self-declared "Chosenites," Zionists, Jewish supremacists, racketeering Jewish networks or, on the Left, crypto-Jewish networks like the Jewish Bolsheviks) on the one hand, and Westernised, Christianized, enlightened Jews on the other.

The problem is that the Judeofascists, and often even the enlightened Jews themselves enthrall to the Judeofascist element, attempt to shoehorn all Jews into the Judeofascist camp, and then reconcile all Jewish identity with Judeofascism, as the author of the article above is attempting to do here.

The answer is to a) acknowledge the reality of Judeofascism; and b) for enlightened Jews to stop attempting to reconcile themselves with their Judeofascist cousins, and stop attempting to whitewash their differences, which only enables the more domineering Judeofascist element to continue its selfish, dysfunctional and murderous ways without causing a fracture in "the family."

Enlightened Jews must be willing to both call out their Judeofascist cousins, and to even go to war with them if necessary, lest the entirety of Jewry be tarred by the dark dealings of the Judeofascist menace.

Thus far in history, no critical mass of Jewry has been ready, willing and able to do this, which is why blanket anti-Semitism endures, and will continue to endure until the Judeofascist menace is acknowledged, identified, exposed, and isolated by the enlightened element of Jewry itself.

Enlightened Jews can continue the forced, bad marriage to their Judeofascist cousins indefinitely and endure the immemorial cycle of Gentile-abusing monetary schemes and authoritarian ideological conspiracies perpetrated by Judeofasicst element followed by increasing, generalised anti-Jewishness followed by outbreaks of anti-Semitism followed by pogroms, or they can make the decision to acknowledge and confront the Judeofascist element, and declare: Never again will you be allowed to sink all Jews by implicating all in your evil, Judeofascist schemes, authoritarian ideologies, and black conspiracies.

Pedophiles, thieves and worse protected by Jewish law of Mesirah, which prohibits Jews from informing to Civil Authorities on other Jews

From:
Agudath Israel: Mesirah Overrides America’s Laws

(Occidental Observer) -- by John Graham --

In April, in Is observing the Mesirah prohibition compatible with being American? I discussed the threat posed to Americans generally by the Jewish tradition of Misirah. This prohibits Jews from telling the Civil Authorities of crimes being committed by other Jews. My interest was stimulated by realizing when studying the Madoff Affair that many financially sophisticated Jews suspected criminality, but did nothing.

I noted
In recent years increased consciousness of the issue of pedophilia, sexual abuse generally and drugs has driven most of the Jewish discussion of Mesirah. Some Jewish organizations like the Rabbinical Council of America have explicitly called for Mesirah to be overlooked in these cases.
The latest news is that this laudable trend seems to be going into reverse.
One of America’s leading ultra-Orthodox groups has reaffirmed that its followers must consult a rabbi before going to law enforcement authorities with suspicions of sexual abuse committed by community members.

The admonitions, from speakers at a conference sponsored by Agudath Israel of America, came even though a recent rabbinic edict permits reporting such crimes to secular authorities…Rabbi Shalom Elyashiv, one of ultra-Orthodoxy’s foremost authorities on Jewish religious law, or Halacha. recently decreed that Jews with reasonable suspicions that a case of sexual abuse has occurred are permitted to go to secular law enforcement authorities, notwithstanding traditional religious prohibitions against mesirah, or informing on fellow Jews. (Ultra-Orthodox Group Affirms Abuse Cases Go First To Rabbi By Paul Berger The Jewish Daily Forward May 25 2011)
Many States have laws mandating people in certain professional positions to report suspicions of abuse. The Agudath Israel position is that these should be ignored.
Rabbi David Zwiebel, Agudah’s executive vice president, told the conference that even mandated reporters — teachers, social workers and people in certain other professions who are required by law to promptly report any suspected cases of sexual abuse — should consult a rabbi before going to the police.
The Forward found a District Attorney with courage:
Marlene Lynch Ford, the Ocean County prosecutor whose jurisdiction includes the large strictly Orthodox enclave of Lakewood, said that the advice given at the Agudah conference could violate New Jersey law.
“…the law is incumbent on [all involved], if they have grounds for reasonable suspicion, to make disclosures.”

(The Brooklyn DA’s office was too terrified to be coherent, exciting the contempt of the remarkable Failed Messiah blog.)

Many in the Jewish Community find Agudath Israel’s stance outrageous, and The Forward quotes some of them.

But when Mesirah can apparently impede protecting even children who are Jewish from repulsive abuse, the rest of us might fairly ask:

What does it do in cases of general Jewish criminality inflicted on society as a whole?...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

More evidence that so much of Jewry is comprised of nothing more than an international ethnic racket and insular cult. And yet, led by American elites, these are the people that the Establishment of the post-WWII West has increasingly held up as the ultimate moral authority, and on whose behalf the U.S. Establishment is actually sending Americans to fight wars in the Middle East.

Because Americans were never properly grounded in the traditional Christianity of Western civilization as were the Europeans, and because the country has itslelf participated in the process of being slowly taken over by nests of money-worshipping vipers and politically correct authoritarians who hide behind various "moral" facades such as Judeo-Chirstian Zionism and multiculturalist artifice, we became the perfect "mark" for the Jewish cult and its lowlife collaborators to manipulate and subjugate. Next comes enslavement, similar to the enslaved U.S. Military sent to round after round of war with Islam on behalf of the Judeofascist predators and their agenda to use a "national security" state to enforce Jewish supremacism in both the Middle East and in the West (e.g. Homeland Security).

Recall what Bill Clinton's Secretary of State, the crypto-Jew Madeline Albright, said on behalf of the Bosnia offensive, warm up to later Clinton administration offensives in Iraq: "What's the point of having this superb military that you're always talking about if we can't use it?"

Well, we're using it now, and portions of it against the American people themselves, largely being run by an insular, criminal cult of Zionist thugs, apparently protecting itself with codes of silence like Misirah.

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Philo-Semitic English rubes find that Jewry doesn't reciprocate fancy of their traditional culture

From:
The War on the English: A Case Study in the Culture of Critique, Part 1

(The Occidental Observer) -- by Brenton Sanderson --

In the last fifty years the culture of critique has reengineered public discourse in the West so successfully that laudatory references to European ethnic groups, such as the English, are today widely held to be morally repugnant. This reality is confirmed by the recent experience of Brian True-May, the co-creator of the internationally successful television series Midsomer Murders. One of most successful British cultural exports of the last decade, Midsomer Murders draws large audiences around the world – particularly in the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. The long-running series is known for its quaint English village setting which provides the backdrop for classic (if clichéd) murder mysteries.

The program made international headlines in March when True-May was suspended by ITV. Asked in an interview to account for the show’s international success, he said his winning formula was quite simple: keep it as English as possible. He pointed out that the series simply ‘wouldn’t work’ if there was any racial diversity portrayed in the sleepy village set in the fictional county of Midsomer. ‘We just don’t have ethnic minorities involved. Because it wouldn’t be the English village with them,’ he told the Radio Times. ‘It just wouldn’t work. Suddenly we might be in Slough … We’re the last bastion of Englishness and I want to keep it that way. Maybe I’m not politically correct … I’m trying to make something that appeals to a certain audience, which seems to succeed. And I don’t want to change it.’

Predictably enough, an ITV spokesman immediately issued a statement: ‘We are shocked and appalled at these personal comments by Brian True-May which are absolutely not shared by anyone at ITV. We are in urgent discussions with All3Media, the producer of Midsomer Murders, who have informed us that they have launched an immediate investigation into the matter and have suspended Mr True-May pending the outcome.’ ITV was captured by the Judeo-Marxist establishment long ago, and Jewish editorial control at ITV has been ensured for the next generation with the recent appointment of the 32-year-old Jonathan Levi as head of ITV’s arts and popular culture division. The situation at the BBC is little different...MORE...LINK

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Jewish dissident who confronted Netanyahu in Congress and was attacked by lawless Judeofascist thugs tells her story

From:
Why did I disrupt?

(Mondoweiss) -- by Rae Abileah --

Do you know that our Congress gave 29 standing ovations to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when he spoke in the Capital on Tuesday, May 24? I couldn't watch this hero's welcome for a man who supports the continued building of illegal settlements, won't lift the siege of Gaza, and refuses to negotiate with the new Palestinian unity government. During the talk, when Netanyahu was praising young people rising up for democracy in the Middle East, and I took my cue to stand up from my seat in the Capitol Gallery, unfurl a banner, and shout, "No More Occupation! Stop Israeli War Crimes! Equal Rights for Palestinians!"

Immediately, I was tackled, gagged and violently shoved to the floor by other members of the audience, many of whom were still wearing their badges from the AIPAC conference this past weekend. Police dragged me out of the Capitol gallery, and an ambulance whisked me to the hospital, where I was treated for neck and shoulder injuries and put under arrest for disrupting Congress. After I disrupted, Netanyahu said to his Congressional audience, "You can't have these protests in Tehran; this is real democracy."

Is it? What kind of a democracy do we live in when free speech is met with brutality and arrest? In a real democracy, our representatives would be looking out for our best interests, not the interests of a foreign government, ie, Israel. I want my government to take an even-handed approach that respects the rights of both Israelis and Palestinians. But in our so-called democracy, special interest lobby groups like AIPAC have enormous power because of their ability to direct campaign contributions.

So we have a very skewed policy that ignores the rights of the Palestinians, allows repeated Israeli violations of international law, sullies the U.S. reputation internationally, and gives $3 billion a year of our tax dollars to the Israel military when we need this money here at home. Before we go preaching democracy abroad, we should make our own democracy more responsive to the public good, not the wishes of wealthy lobbyists.

On Monday night, May 23, five brave activists disrupted Netanyahu's speech at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Gala and were also met with assaults. The young women who had spoken out were subjected not only to assault, but to sexual groping by male AIPAC attendees. But these activists felt compelled to speak out against Netanyahu’s claim that returning to the 1967 borders would be “indefensible,” when it is Israeli policies that are really indefensible: starving Gaza, occupying and stealing land, bulldozing homes, silencing dissent. (see videos here). The same day, at a press conference at the National Press Club about military aid to Israel and the dangerous role of the Israel Lobby, activist Allison Weir had her phone slugged out of her hand by an angry Zionist. This sounds eerily similar to the alleged democracy in Israel, where Palestinians and Israelis are routinely assaulted, arrested and jailed for speaking out against the Israeli occupation.

For the Palestinian people who live under Israel’s 44-year-old military occupation, violence dominates everyday life. Zinad Samouni of Gaza is a living testament to this oppressive reality. She lost 48 family members during Israel’s December 2008 bombardment of Gaza, and hers became yet another tragic story in a long history of home demolitions, land confiscation, and systematic violation of the Palestinians’ basic human rights. After the massacre of the Samouni family, Israeli soldiers left behind racist graffiti such as "Arabs need 2 die'' and "1 is DOWN 999,999 TO GO.”...MORE...LINK

Are Judeofascists incapable of thinking out the consequences of their ideological rackets (or are they simply free will, greedy ethnomaniacs)?

From:
Gilad Atzmon: A Warning From The Past

(gilad.co.uk) -- by Gilad Atzmon --

Netanyahu's successful speech before the American joint houses was an extravaganza of Jewish power: there can be little doubt that as far as American elected politicians are concerned, Benjamin Netanyahu actually appears to be far more popular than even the American president himself.

Yet, you may want to ask yourself -- are Netanyahu and the Jewish State really popular amongst the American people? Do the American people approve of their elected politicians being AIPAC’s puppets? Are the American congressmen and senators serving American interests by aligning themselves so subserviently to AIPAC’s goals -- or are they increasingly being subjected to pressure from a foreign state’s lobby?

It is all becoming pretty much like watching the way power operates in a totalitarian regime: American politicians are submissively obeying 'the call of Zion' as they stand up and applaud Netanyahu at all the ‘right moments.' And they clearly realise, all too well, that failing to do so would mean immediate political annihilation.

The Israeli and Jewish press were very impressed with Netanyahu’s success in Washington. But, what we saw in Washington may well turn out to be bad news for Israel and American Jewry: the endless trail of Jewish collective tragedies is there to teach us that Jews always pay eventually ( and heavily ) for Jewish power exercises. Yet, surprisingly ( and tragically ) enough, Jews somehow consistently fail to internalise and learn from that very lesson.

Sadly enough, every form of Jewish political gathering is, unfortunately, an exercise in Jewish power -- whether in the American Senate, or even within the Palestinian Solidarity movement.

There is a devastating pattern that can be observed here, that some Jews seem to follow -- they push relentlessly towards an aim or goal that they interpret as a ‘collective Jewish interest’ -- and again and again, for some unknown reason, they repeatedly fail to notice potential ‘hazard lights’, consistently misinterpreting tolerance as the ‘Goyim’s stupidity’.

And as we have seen in history, repeatedly, Jewish collective tragedies always follow a pattern that begins with such rich tales of golden ages of assimilation within the corridors of power . One need only look at Spain, Eastern Europe and Germany, and these are just a few examples of such repeated patterns.

The grave failure of America's leading political institutions to confront AIPAC could very easily turn into a gigantic tidal wave of anti-Israel and anti-Jewish feelings. If the Jewish Lobby in America were at all responsible, it would be aware of the possibility of such an adverse reaction -- but it is obsessed with its own success. The United States seems to lack the political will and know-how to restrain AIPAC, and the meaning , implications and results of it all may very well turn out to be devastating.

I guess that the answer to AIPAC is not yet another J-Street lobby, attempting to buy the very few remaining unaffiliated American politicians.

I’d like to urgently suggest here, that ‘hands off international politics’ should be the immediate Jewish call to their relentless lobbies.

But I know very well that is not going to happen...LINK

Old Testament goggles: How Judeofascists and Judeo-Christian Zionists view the contemporary world and current events

From:
The Book of Netanyahu

(AntiWar.com) -- by Philip Giraldi --

On the First Day Lord Netanyahu met with his faithful counselor Count Avigdor. Avigdor said, "O Lord Netanyahu, you must go even unto the land of the Obamaites to deal with their King. The Obamaites have rendered unto us their gold and precious goods in great abundance but now their King is seeking to treat with our enemies." Then Netanyahu spoke and his heart was full of anger. "Yea verily, we must smite them and also their wives and children and all that they hold dear. For even as we have smitten the children of Canaan we will strike them. They shall ken who is master and who is slave. Prepare for me my chariot of gold and I will journey even unto the land of the Obamaites with my host. Instruct our brethren in the land of the Obamaites to prepare for my coming with stealth. Organize them with weapons ready at hand and instruct them to deceive the Obamaites by declaring fealty and respect for the Kingdom of Obama so the King’s retainers will not fear them. When the King of the Obamaites declares his bad faith they shall be prepared to rise up and join us." And so it was done. Lord Netanyahu ascended into his chariot of gold to confront the King of the Obamaites and smite him sorely. And the children of Israel rejoiced.

On the Second Day the King of the Obamaites ascended to his throne in the mighty castle hewn from white stone, the seat of his forefathers. His thoughts were heavy but his heart was filled with cunning. "My messengers have brought me news that afflicts me sorely. Lord Netanyahu is coming in his chariot of gold with all his array even unto our land. He will make demands from the people of Obama and his heart is filled with anger. I will speak first to my people and grant Lord Netanyahu much of what he seeks and so we might avoid the righteous wrath of the Israelites." And so the King of the Obamaites spake to his people, saying "Lord Netanyahu is approaching our lands in his golden chariot with his mighty host. We have rendered unto the Israelites our gold and other precious goods and have pledged our fealty to them. But we must do more to avoid the wrath of Lord Netanyahu. We will grant Lord Netanyahu and the people of Israel all our goods and pledge our children and our children’s children for his wars against the Godless. We will confirm our pledge that the Land of Israel shall be forever the Land of the Godly untainted by unbelievers. More, we will use all our power to reject the false words of the children of Canaan, who have claimed the land of Israel for their own and seek to make league against her. We will do all that and more, but we will reserve only one thing to ourselves. Seeking peace for the Land of the Obamaites with the children of Canaan we will ask Lord Netanyahu to allow to them a small land of their own where they might settle in tranquility. That is all we shall ask."

On the Third Day Lord Netanyahu arrived even unto the Land of the Obamaites in his golden chariot accompanied by all his array. And he waxed wroth at the false words spoken by the King of the Obamaites. "I will go to confront the King of the Obamaites in his mighty castle hewn from white stone, the seat of his forefathers. I will instruct him that the Lord God of the Israelites is a cruel master who will smite those who do not heed his word. Why do the children of Canaan continue to vex us? It is three score years and more since we made their lands our own and we have slain them a hundred fold. Their raiment is torn and ragged. They shall not find a place where they can pile stone upon stone for a dwelling, nor draw water to slake their thirst, nor plant seeds to grow corn for their sustenance. Their wives and children will wander the earth but no one will grant them shelter." And the King of the Obamaites feared greatly at the words of Lord Netanyahu for he knew that the God of the Israelites was a cruel God but just and would smite the Obamaites with the plagues that once descended on Egypt. "I pledge my fealty to thee oh Lord Netanyahu for you are both just and powerful. My people ask only your intercession to spare them from the wrath of the mighty God of the Israelites." But Lord Netanyahu would not spare the Obamaites, for they had defied his own power and had erected false idols against the might of Israel’s God. "You know not of what you speak and you will feel my wrath when your own people rise up and call my name and that of the God of the Israelites." And so Lord Netanyahu departed from the white castle wherein dwelt the King of the Obamaites, who was much shaken and fearful of the anger of the Israelites.

On the Fourth Day the King of the Obamaites went to the great meeting of the friends of Lord Netanyahu who dwelt in his land and his heart was filled with cunning. "I will speak to them with guile and tell of my great love for Lord Netanyahu and the people of Israel lest they rise up and seize their weapons and bring suffering to the Land of Obama." And so it was done, but the friends of Lord Netanyahu were not deceived and they saw through the falseness of the King of the Obamaites’ words. But Lord Netanyahu bid them to conceal their displeasure and hide their weapons for a time as the wise counselor Count Avigdor had foreseen the cunning of the Obamaites. Lord Netanyahu would challenge the power of the King of the Obamaites twice and even thrice and would smite him again, even as David smote Goliath.

On the Fifth Day Lord Netanyahu also went to the great meeting the friends of Israel who dwelt in the land of Obama. His heart was filled with joy as a mighty roar rose to the heavens. He told them "The words of the King of the Obamaites are false. He seeks to make peace with the sons of Canaan but the God of the Israelites has said that the raiment of the sons of Canaan shall be torn. They shall find neither shelter, nor water, nor sustenance and will wander the earth as do creatures of the forest and field, moving from place to place in search of a home but no one will succor them." The friends of Israel then rose up as one and with a mighty voice affirmed the wisdom of Lord Netanyahu. "We will rise up against the King of the Obamaites and destroy the false idols that he has erected. We will rend asunder the children of Canaan."...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

--------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

It's truly sad and pathetic how the Judeo-Christian Zionists have now totally thrown out the New Testament and the words of the Prince of Peace, and completely converted themselves to Zionists. Of course, most of these were probably never really Christians at all in the first place, but rather, like the Judeofascists who are the object of their envy and wholesale loyalty, have always used religion to mask their base appetites like greed and racism, and to paper over their bottomless insecurities born of their self-chosen, free will path to mental derangement and sociopathy.

If only they'd given the words of Jesus a second glance...

***

And what about all those Jewish Zionists who dwell in the Blue States, provide the Democratic Party with 50% of its funding, comprise 25% of the Democratic caucus in the U.S. Senate, and have spearheaded the Israel-first agenda for decades? Are they to be given a "pass"?

The Red State, Judeo-Christian Zionist fascists (a small minority of Red State dwellers) are merely the useful idiots for the Blue State Judeofascists, who are the brains behind the operation, and dwell almost entirely in the Democratic Party because it is easily manipulated, and has always been oh-so-sympathetic to their poor, persecuted plight.

An unaccredited New York Times reporter once said: “When and if fascism comes to America it will not be labeled ‘made in Germany’; it will not be marked with a swastika; it will not even be called fascism; it will be called, of course, ‘Americanism’”

He was partially right. It isn’t called “Americanism,” but rather Israel-firstism. And oh, what a perfect Trojan horse for fascism: fascism’s ultimate "victims." Talk about having license...

But then, doesn’t this article by Giraldi hint at how fascism is already inherent in their Torah religious doctrine?

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Powerful Jewish Zionists attempt to suppress Zionism's own dark history of Nazi collaboration, ongoing Nazi emulation

From:
Denying Nazi-Zionist collusion

The Sacramento Bee, Darrell Steinberg, and Islamophobia
(If Americans Knew) -- by Alison Weir --

In an inversion of journalistic ethics, the Sacramento Bee reported on opposition to an event before and after it took place, but didn’t cover the event itself.

It featured an entire report on accusations against a flier, but didn’t include a response from the flier’s authors.

It printed claims by powerful local figures that the flier was “an outrageous lie,” but refused to print information showing that the flier’s statements were factual.

Its headline about the allegedly offensive flier emphasized a Muslim connection, even though there was virtually no Muslim connection to the flier.

It neglected to report that one of those attacking the flier had previously attempted to use his official position to prevent the event at which the flier was distributed from taking place.

And finally, the Bee’s parent company, McClatchy, one of the nation’s largest newspaper chains, then sent out the Bee’s deficient story about a flier nation-wide, also emphasizing a (largely non-existent) Muslim connection in its headline, which then appeared on newspaper websites in Florida, Texas, Idaho, Mississippi, Alaska, and elsewhere, generating anti-Muslim comments.

The event in question was part of a national speaking tour that featured an Auschwitz survivor speaking about Israel’s treatment of Palestinians. Called “Never Again For Anyone,” it was sponsored by a diverse array of eight national organizations and nine local ones, secular, Jewish and Muslim, who reserved a hall owned by the local Islamic Center as the venue for the event. Also speaking was Dr. Hatem Bazian, a prominent academic from UC Berkeley.

The talk was immediately opposed by the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the 13-member Board of Rabbis of Greater Sacramento, who contacted the Islamic center and demanded that the center refuse to allow the event to take place.

The rabbis called it a “program of hate,” claimed that both the theme and the presence of an Auschwitz survivor speaking about the plight of Palestinians were “anti-Semitic,” stated that allowing the 86-year-old Auschwitz survivor to speak would “defile the sacred memory of millions who perished during the Holocaust” (nothing was said of the multitudes of non-Jews, including Arabs and Muslims, who died under the Nazis), and threatened that Jewish-Muslim relations would be fatally jeopardized if the Islamic Center did not renege on its agreement to allow the event to take place on its property...

California is in deep trouble. It is over $26 billion in debt and is facing potential bankruptcy. People have lost homes, businesses have failed, university fees have escalated. Yet, the Senate’s President Pro Tem, Darrell Steinberg, one of California’s most powerful politicians, twice took time out of his necessarily busy schedule to lodge semi-official complaints about the “Never Again” event...

Worse yet, since the Bee and McClatchy then chose to emphasize the venue of the event in their headline (“Flier at California Muslim center condemned by state senator”), despite the fact that the center had nothing to do with the flier, a headline and news story were sent around the country that served to reinforce the Islamophobic fiction that Muslims are inherently anti-Semitic, generating comments such as:

“Muslims have been successfully trading in anti-Semitism for decades, Steinberg isn't going to put a dent in it,” “ ‘The holocaust never happened.’ Since that didn't work, certain Muslims decided to try this disgusting piece of nonsense,” “My, my, those Muslim propaganda sites must be working overtime.”

Zionist-Nazi Collusion
In point of fact, however, the flier’s statements are accurate. There is detailed evidence that some Zionists collaborated with the Nazis, that Zionists sabotaged anti-Nazi boycotts, and that Zionists interfered with efforts to rescue victims of Nazi oppression.

When facts first emerged in the 1950s about Zionist-Nazi collusion, it caused considerable scandal in Israel and led to the fall of the Israeli government of the time. A number of books are dedicated to this subject and it is discussed in numerous others, almost all by Jewish and/or Israeli authors. The topic inspired novels by well-known Israeli writers Amos Elon and Neil Gordon, was the subject of a 1987 British play, and was portrayed in a 1994 Israeli docudrama. It’s surprising that Steinberg and the Board of Rabbis make no indication of ever having heard anything about this.

Popular American playwright and fervent Zionist Ben Hecht wrote the first book on the subject, Perfidy, relating the history of a Hungarian Zionist leader who arranged for his family and several hundred prominent Jews to escape while facilitating the movement of the rest of Hungarian Jews to Nazi concentration camps.

Hannah Arendt, in her 1960 book Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report in the Banality of Evil, writes: “To a Jew this role of the Jewish leaders in the destruction of their own people is undoubtedly the darkest chapter of the whole dark story.”

In The Transfer Agreement: The Dramatic Story of the Pact between the Third Reich and Jewish Palestine (containing an afterword by ADL head Abe Foxman), pro-Israel writer Edwin Black reports that in 1933 Zionist leaders concluded a secret pact with the Third Reich that transferred 60,000 Jews and $100,000 to Palestine, Zionists promising in return that they would halt the worldwide boycott “that threatened to topple the Hitler regime in its first year.”

Author-researcher Lenny Brenner wrote of Zionist-Nazi collusion in Zionism in the Age of Dictators, of which the London Times stated: “Brenner is able to cite numerous cases where Zionists collaborated with anti-Semitic regimes, including Hitler’s.”

Brenner’s second book on the topic, “51 Documents, Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis,” includes a 1940 letter from underground Zionist terrorist leader Avraham Stern proposing that Jewish militias would fight on Germany’s side in exchange for Nazi help in creating an “historic Jewish state.”

In What Price Israel, American Council for Judaism member Alfred Lilienthal describes FDR’s efforts to set up a program to rescue refugees, only to find Zionists sabotaging it. Roosevelt explained: “The Zionist movement knows that Palestine is, and will be for some time, a remittance society. They know that they can raise vast sums for Palestine by saying to donors, ‘There is no other place this poor Jew can go.’”

When New York attorney Morris Ernst joined this refugee effort, he was shocked: “I was thrown out of parlors of friends of mine who very frankly said ‘Morris, this is treason. You are undermining the Zionist movement.’” Ernst wrote that he found a fanatical movement of men “little concerned about human blood if it is not their own.”

In The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust, Israeli historian Tom Segev quotes Zionist leader and future Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion: “If I knew that it was possible to save all the [Jewish] children of Germany by transporting them to England, but only half of them by transporting them to Palestine, I would choose the second.”

Segev writes that Ben-Gurion worried that ‘the human conscience’ might cause various countries to open their doors to Jewish refugees from Germany and saw this as a threat, warning: ‘Zionism is in danger.’”

In the Bee’s report on the controversy, Sacramento’s Rabbi Alfi is further quoted as saying "there is no comparison" between the treatment of Jews in pre-war Germany and Palestinians. Yet, in 2002 the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz reported that the Israeli military was specifically studying Nazi Warsaw Ghetto strategies for use in the Palestinian Occupied Territories...MORE...LINK

Nazis on Mediterranean: Racist Ashkenazi Jews in 1950’s Israel eugenically irradiated non-European Jews under guise of treating ringworm

From:
The Ringworm Children 1 of 5

(YouTube.com) -- by rodnjac1 --



Related: Ashkenazi Jews on cutting edge of eugenics movement to this very day:
From:
Review of John Glad’s “Jewish Eugenics”

(Occidental Observer) -- by Kevin MacDonald --

Jewish Eugenics, by John Glad. Washington, DC: Wooden Shore Publishers, 2011; 464pp. (Downloadable at either www.whatwemaybe or www.woodenshore.org. These sites also have Glad’s Future Human Evolution.)

John Glad begins Jewish Eugenics by noting that “much of what might be termed ‘accepted eugenics narrative’ is in crass discordance with the historical facts” (p. 8). In other words, we are about to enter one of those academic minefields where “truth” is rigorously cleansed to make sure it is compatible with ethnic interests. Indeed, “writing books about Jews used to be a far easier undertaking than it is today, with Jewish anxieties over ‘anti-Semitism’ having been so elevated as to render dispassionate scholarly discourse nearly impossible” (p. 8)...

In the case of eugenics and Jews, the reason for this historical obfuscation is clear: In recent decades, eugenics has been reconstructed as an anti-Jewish ideology—indeed, as the ideology of the Holocaust. Therefore, all Jewish involvement in eugenics must be expunged from the historical record. “You are reading a book on a topic that supposedly not only does not exist, but one that is even inconceivable” (p. 10). Given this motivation, it is not surprising that when Glad refers to what he labels the “eugenics-bashing industry,” that he notes that the industry is “mostly Jewish” (p. 21). “Even as Russia was shaking off the mythology of Lysenkoism, the West was celebrating its betrothal to Lysenko’s heirs. An intellectual coup d’état had taken place, and many of the purge masters were Jews shoving aside other Jews” (p. 27).

Nevertheless, the reality is that Jews have been prime beneficiaries of eugenic practices. Glad’s thesis is that “for all its excesses, eugenics has been an astounding, indeed an existential success for Jews, molding them into a uniquely resourceful and intelligent people, and the current assault on eugenics by an understandably emotion-driven minority Jewish faction represents a frontal assault on the very essence of Judaism” (p. 11). This group has intimidated Jewish supporters of eugenics, at least in Western countries. As we shall see, a watered down version of eugenics is alive and well in Israel...MORE...LINK

Old Testament as rule of law: Backed by majority of Jewry and cheered on by Congress, Netanyahu spearheads Jewish supremacist vision

From:
Alas, the battle over a Jewish state in the Middle East is an irrepressible conflict

(MondoWeiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

My grim headline refers to a theory of the Civil War, that it was an inevitable battle because great forces were opposed, each with core commitments to values that were irreconcilable. And thus, a massive bloodletting.

It is hard to view Netanyahu's visit to the United States in different terms. He is the ultimate expression of Zionism: the Revisionist belief that Jews have a right to all the land between the river and the sea because of the Bible.

There are ways to have imagined Israel working out in the Middle East as a good neighbor. But relentless expansionism and Jewish exceptionalism aren't the answer, still that is the answer that Israelis chose.

And on the other side, I actually agree with Netanyahu, there has surely been Palestinian agency in the outcome. Many Palestinians never accepted the existence of a Jewish state on their land. Many Palestinians were opposed to Oslo, which gave 78 percent of that land to the Israelis. The Palestinian Diaspora never accepted the Jewish state; and were I in the Palestinian Diaspora, I'd be hard-pressed to reach a different conclusion. And so if you are Palestinian, it is hard to see why you wouldn't just wait and watch the whole thing self-destruct. As Jeffrey Goldberg says today, Palestinians have time on their side.

Goldberg is shocked and confused by Netanyahu's insistence on holding on to the West Bank. Settlements are an "existential threat," he says. Goldberg wants to squeeze a two-state solution and a viable Palestinian state out of the existing situation. But he seems to acknowledge the real likelihood here: an apartheid state.

Of course an apartheid state is exactly what Palestinian solidarity activists and realists like John Mearsheimer have been telling us about for several years now. When Jimmy Carter warned us about it, just five years ago, he was run out of town on a rail. As Jonathan Demme chronicled, the good liberal Jewish media assailed him. Terry Gross jumped on him. Al Franken said, Why do you hate the Jews? And Mearsheimer was blasted as an anti-semite-- by among others Jeffrey Goldberg.

Mearsheimer was putting his finger on the real source of the power: pro-Israel money corrupting our political process. And because this was an argument about Jewish influence, Jewish faction, Goldberg and the Forward and the New York Times and the New Yorker had to scourge Mearsheimer.

But I believe that Goldberg will come to Mearsheimer's side at last. For the real tragedy of Netanyahu's visit was the supine Congress. Again and again they rose to embrace him. They applauded him when he said that Jews have a right to the West Bank, applauded him when they said that Jews should control Jerusalem. Because the Congress is corrupted...MORE...LINK

Jewish dissident assaulted by Zionist thugs during Netanyahu speech, hospitalized, arrested

From:
Protester who heckled Netanyahu in Congress allegedly beaten, arrested at hospital

(Raw Story) -- by Eric W. Dolan --

CODEPINK activist Rae Abileah was arrested at the George Washington University Hospital in Washington D.C. after heckling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, according to the anti-war group.

The 28-year-old Jewish American woman was allegedly tackled by members of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) during Netanyahu's speech to Congress after she yelled, "stop Israeli war crimes."

WATCH: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu heckled during address to Congress

Abileah was taken to the George Washington University Hospital, where she was being treating for neck and shoulder injuries.

"You know I take it as a badge of honor, and so should you, that in our free societies that you can have protest," Netanyahu said after being interrupted by Abileah. "You can't have these protest in the farcical parliaments in Tehran or in Tripoli. This is real democracy."

Speaking from her hospital bed, Abileah said she was in "great pain" but that it was nothing "compared to the pain and suffering that Palestinians go through on a regular basis."

“I have been to Gaza and the West Bank, I have seen Palestinians homes bombed and bulldozed, I have talked to mothers whose children have been killed during the invasion of Gaza, I have seen the Jewish-only roads leading to ever-expanding settlements in the West Bank."

"This kind of colonial occupation cannot continue," she added. "As a Jew and a U.S. citizen, I feel obligated to rise up and speak out against stop these crimes being committed in my name and with my tax dollars.”...MORE...LINK

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

The mass of Jewry and even its statist "liberal" partisans finally unmask themselves as fascists when der Fuhrer comes to town

From:
The Emperor’s clothes are still on, for now (while his heckler is roughed up, hospitalized)

(MondoWeiss) -- by Josh Ruebner --

Gliding down the aisle of the House of Representatives like a popular president about to deliver the State of the Union address, escorted by a phalanx of dozens of ebullient Members of Congress, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu entered a joint meeting of Congress today to a round of hearty handshakes and a thunderous standing ovation.

In a post-speech press conference, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid gushed that Netanyahu delivered an “all-star” address, and Netanyahu proclaimed it a “great day” for Israel. And, in the self-contained world that is Capitol Hill, who could blame them for believing it to be so?

For in a world in which Israel finds itself as isolated as ever by a growing and successful Palestinian civil society-led international movement of boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) against its apartheid policies; in which Palestinians are taking matters into their own hands diplomatically and pushing to have the United Nations admit the State of Palestine as a full member of the organization this fall; and in which even the President of the United States appears disgruntled by Israel’s intransigent ongoing colonization of Palestinian land, at least on Capitol Hill, Netanyahu can still play the ace up his sleeve to aplomb and then chum around like the king of the castle.

There on Capitol Hill, Netanyahu still has friends like Senator Chuck Schumer, who told a Jewish radio program that “One of my roles, very important in the United States Senate, is to be a shomer [guard]—to be a or the shomer Yisrael [guard of Israel]. And I will continue to be that with every bone in my body." With friends like these wrapped around his little finger, no wonder Netanyahu’s forcible denunciations of international law were met with such rapturous approbation by Members of Congress who applauded his rejectionism dozens of times...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
From:
We can only pray that Congress’s supine conduct before a rightwing foreign leader will have political consequences

(MondoWeiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

In Israel they say that the occupation devoured Israeli politics so that everyone is beholden to the settlers, well the same thing is happening to American politics and today it was evident. I'm not the only one to feel shattered by Netanyahu's bravura performance in Congress today laying claim to the West Bank as the ancestral Jewish homeland-- and the Congress's prostrate acceptance of his rightwing declarations.

"In Judea and Samara, the Jewish people are not foreign occupiers," he said to a standing ovation-- I even saw John Kerry standing. "We are not the British in India. We are not the Belgians in the Congo."

And Netanyahu got the same standing ovation when he said, crazily: "Jerusalem must remain the united capital of Israel. I know that this is a difficult issue for Palestinians."

No wonder David Welna of NPR has quoted John Mearsheimer as lead analyst in his piece tonight-- a breakthrough by the gobsmacked media. Writes a friend: "With this speech Netanyahu becomes the right-wing politician of most serious national stature in America. He put a lot of work into the words, and the delivery. It was necessary to have some understanding of (a) history, (b) politics, and (c) character in order to see through it. The distortions were everywhere. But I doubt that 20 members of Congress were equipped to notice them. There must have been a dozen standing ovations. He has taken Hamas off the table, put the peril of Iran back on the table, and bound the U.S. to Israel under the sign of power and providence."

ABC says there were 20 standing ovations, on MSNBC I heard there were 26. Staggering. Our president is overseas, and his spokesman Ben Rhodes was afraid to contradict Netanyahu in any way today. This is power of the lobby in our politics, and it looks as disastrous to me as the slave power's ability to enforce unanimity in American politics in the 1850s...MORE...LINK

Judeofascist psychopaths run the Globalist economic regime? Rape case against IMF chief Strauss-Kahn appears air tight

From:
EXCLUSIVE: Strauss-Kahn Told Maid 'Don’t You Know Who I Am?' During Alleged Sex Attack

(Fox News) -- by Jana Winter --

Dominique Strauss-Kahn told a New York City hotel maid, “Don’t you know who I am! Don’t you know who I am?” while pinning her down during the alleged sexual assault, law enforcement sources close to the investigation told FoxNews.com.

That and other details of the maid's complaint to police emerged Monday as police confirmed that disgraced ex-International Monetary Fund boss Strauss-Kahn's DNA was found on the maid's shirt.

Police sources confirmed to FoxNews.com that authorities were able to match a DNA sample taken from Strauss-Kahn with semen on the shirt.

Strauss-Kahn, who is out on $1 million bail, faces sexual assault charges in the alleged attack.

Sources told FoxNews.com that the 32-year-old African immigrant repeatedly told her alleged attacker, “Please, please stop. No!”

The sources said she had no idea who was staying in the $3,000-a-night junior presidential suite until after the alleged attack, which lasted approximately thirty minutes.

According to the maid’s account, as told to investigators and relayed to FoxNews.com, the maid entered the room and was confronted by a naked Strauss-Kahn, who emerged from the bathroom and began grabbing the maid’s breasts while trying to pin her down on his bed.

The maid is deeply religious, investigators said, and immediately put her hands over her eyes so she wouldn’t see the naked Frenchman. He ran to her, began grabbing her breasts and pulling her down the hallway inside the luxury suite toward the bedroom.

The blood-stained white bed sheets were later taken into evidence by police.

The maid said she tried a variety of tactics to get herself out of the room and away from Strauss-Kahn. She said, “my manager is in the hallway,” which he wasn’t -- but the former IMF chief wasn’t scared off. The single mother allegedly told the Frenchman that the job was important to her and any conflict with a hotel guest would result in her losing her job.

“Please stop. I need my job, I can’t lose my job, don’t do this. I will lose my job. Please, please stop! Please stop!” she told Strauss-Kahn, according to law enforcement sources.

Strauss-Kahn allegedly responded: “No, baby. Don’t worry, you’re not going to lose your job. Please, baby, don’t worry,” Strauss-Kahn responded, according to investigators. “Don’t you know who I am? Don’t you know who I am?”

While she continued to plead with him, begging him to stop, he allegedly continued to attack her, dragging her down the hallway...

When she pushed him away and ran toward the door, she slipped on a newspaper bag on the floor and fell to her knees. That’s when Strauss-Kahn came up behind her and forced her to perform oral sex, sources said.

The maid finally escaped from her alleged attacker by pushing him into the sharp edge of an armoire in the hotel suite. Sources said the Frenchman has a gash on his back where he hit the armoire.

She ran into the service corridor on the floor where co-workers found her and tried to console her. She was shaking profusely and unable to even hold a cup of water, sources said.

Strauss-Kahn also made passes at two separate female concierges during his 24-hour stay. When he checked in, he grabbed and massaged the hand of the concierge and invited her to his room. She declined. Later on that night, Strauss-Kahn called downstairs and invited a different female concierge up to his room. “Come upstairs, I’ve got a beautiful room, a great bottle of wine.” That employee also declined the Frenchman’s advances, sources said.

Sources close to the maid described her as a model employee with a pristine work record who doesn’t drink or smoke and rushes home after work to take care of her children.

On Saturday, May 14, sources said the Sofitel hotel maid followed hotel protocol, knocking three times while yelling “housekeeping” at increasingly loud volume before finally ringing the doorbell. There was no answer from inside the room, and it was after noon checkout time. Sources said the former IMF chief now indicted on sexual assault charges did not request a late checkout and should not have been in his room, which he’d rented for one night.

Additionally, a room service employee cleared Strauss-Kahn’s room and found the room empty minutes before the maid entered. Investigators said they believe the man known as the “Great Seducer” may have intentionally hid from the room service employee, knowing that the maid would enter the room shortly after...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
Prison cell or rubber room? Yet another crazed Jewish banker, former IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn, sweats it out in court

Judeofascist Zionists at AIPAC conference and their thug security apparatus attack dissidents in audience during Fuehrer speech





Even as Democratic Party hack operatives attempt to blame Israel-first on GOP, Jewish Dems line up with Israel against their own president

From:
Head of DNC sees eye to eye with rightwing funder Sheldon Adelson when it comes to Netanyahu

(MondoWeiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

Last night, Chris Matthews attempted to politicize support for Netanyahu, and say that Republicans line up for Netanyahu while Democrats support Obama. Well if he wants to drive that wedge, good for him, it might actually politicize the issue ultimately, but it's not accurate as things stand. Cynthia Tucker responded to Matthews last night, saying, Democrats too! [line up behind Netanyahu against Obama]. And isn't this the ultimate proof-- in Politico today, Debbi Wasserman Shultz, the head of the Democratic National Committee, meeting with Netanyahu and rightwing One-Jerusalem Sheldon Adelson!!! Get on that, Chris:
It’s a powerful enough force to bridge some divides among American Jews, as Netanyahu hosted a meeting with 10 prominent Jewish Democrats and 10 prominent Jewish Republicans, including Democratic Reps. Steve Israel of New York and Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida and Republican casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, at Blair House on Monday.

A source familiar with the discussion said “there may have been a little bit of airing of grievances about the politicization of Israel.”

While support for Israel is far from unanimous — there is a committed, bipartisan corps of lawmakers who side more closely with the Palestinians — it is overwhelming.
...LINK
-------------------------
Related:
Netanyahu publicly humiliates Obama on American soil, before a U.S. audience, on behalf of an Israel-first agenda, because Jewish power means he can

Monday, May 23, 2011

Self-serving Jews the primary element facilitating anti-White racist, identity politic, tribal balkanization of U.S.

From:
Jared Taylor's White Identity: What’s In It For Jews?

(VDare.com) -- by Steve Sailer --

In 1991, Jared Taylor published Paved with Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America, a sober book that sold well by the standards of serious nonfiction. Since then, he has built American Renaissance into a successful magazine and a brand name. You might think that commercial publishers would be interested in his important, just-published, follow-up White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century. You would be naïve.

In the Acknowledgments to his sequel, Taylor writes:

"Finally, I would like to thank Theron Raines and Paul Zack, literary agents who tried very hard to find a publisher for this book but failed. Mr. Raines gave up after two years, and Mr. Zack after a year and a half. I have lost count of the number of rejection letters they gathered from well-re?garded publishing houses, but can only conclude from their lack of success that this book is unfit for commercial publication in the United States."

Taylor can take this consolation: the same happened to Alexander Solzhenitsyn, whose last book [200 Years Together] couldn’t find a New York City publisher either...

What are the prospects for white identity politics emerging as a self-conscious, public force in America?

I’d guess: not good.

This is not to say that white identity politics won’t continue to manifest itself de facto. We saw that, for example, with the Tea Parties and the emergence of an overwhelmingly white movement to protect Medicare in 2009.

But, white people aren’t supposed to say: we’re doing this "to promote the general welfare" of "ourselves and our posterity" (to quote the Constitution’s Preamble). Whites aren’t supposed to say that—and they don’t like to, either. They like to come up with some principled reason, such as: the philosophy of Ayn Rand says so.

Thus, the GOP’s bright young man, Paul Ryan, managing to totally miss the point, announced a plan privatizing Medicare. (Older heads in the House GOP are slowly walking that one back.)

Nevertheless, an explicit white identity movement is unlikely to be tolerated. It’s not so much that blacks, Asians, and Hispanics don’t want this to happen. None of these groups are really all that powerful. Blacks tend to be colorful but not too competent; East Asians competent but colorless; Latinos culturally lethargic and unenterprising.

No, the much more serious roadblock to the emergence of white identity politics: more Jews don’t want it to happen than do want it to happen.

Many Jews have strong reasons for their aversion to white identity politics, either irrational (the Cossacks are coming!) or rational (what’s in it for me?).

Perhaps Taylor can persuade enough Jews to get onboard to make white identity respectable in the MSM and thus with the media’s consumers, the public. He’s striven manfully and graciously over the years to make Jews feel welcome in his movement and many Jews have written for American Renaissance.

Recall that neoconservatism emerged in the late 1960s, largely due to Jewish shopkeepers’ fear of black crime and Jewish civil servants’ fear of being fired by black politicians. Brilliant Jewish intellectuals like Nathan Glazer and Norman Podhoretz took their relatives’ complaints seriously.

Still, over time, Jews mostly figured out it was simply easier to move away from blacks and get better jobs where they didn’t have to deal with many blacks. Let other whites deal with them.

Thus Commentary lost interest in complaining about quotas, and neoconservatism morphed into mostly being an Israel Fan Club.

The fundamental question for 21st Century white identity politics is the same as for Armenians, just two or three orders of magnitude greater in media influence: What’s in it for Jews?

Taylor has worked out strong justifications for why a white identity movement would be good for average, and particularly good for below-average, whites. But not many Jews are below the white average.

Jews are generally praised in the press for engaging in Jewish identity politics. So why would they instead want to engage in disreputable white identity politics? What’s in it for them?

My alternative philosophy of "citizenism" proposed attacking identity politics at its most vulnerable points: Affirmative Action quota preferences for Hispanics and Asians. (See the debate between me and Jared Taylor on VDARE.com.)

Nobody can come up with a good justification for these privileges for immigrant groups. They just free-ride off the anti-white glamour of the 1960s black civil rights movement.

Indeed, there’s no good reason for the “Hispanic” category even to exist in government data. It’s not a race, it’s not an ethnicity, it’s not a linguistic group, it’s just a rent-seeking special privilege. Abolish the category! Once the data isn’t collected anymore, nobody can use government it in lawsuits alleging “disparate impact”.

I did propose conceding permanent quotas for the descendants of American slaves. That’s a high cost, but one we’re likely to pay anyway.

Is my philosophy extolling solidarity among American citizens rather than among whites likely to prove more acceptable to the media gatekeepers that Taylor’s white advocacy?

Sure—in the sense that a two percent probability is twice a one percent probability. You’ll note that, after all these years, I’m still using quotes around "citizenism" because nobody knows what the word is. It hasn’t exactly swept the intellectual world.

This is a pretty depressing way to wrap up. But I do think it’s safe to say that the conventional wisdom will change when it has to change. It probably won’t change until it has to, but it will have to when it has to.

In other words, what historian Hugh Davis Graham called attention to in the title of his 2002 book, Collision Course: The Strange Convergence of Affirmative Action and Immigration Policy in America, can’t go on forever. The mounting "racial ratio" of nonwhite beneficiaries to white benefactors means the system will inevitably break down under the weight of numbers. At that point, white consciousness could be forced into existence.

In the meantime, we can all be thankful that Jared Taylor has been thinking ahead...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

There's no question that a well-managed, responsible, morally grounded White conciousness movement is essential to correcting the Judeofascist and leftist-engineered balkanization of America (and increasingly, the balkanization of the world by way of international Zionist politics, policy and wars).

These Zionists and their stooges and useful idiots on both the Left and the neocon and Judeo-Christian Zionist Right are toxic to America, Christianity, Western civilization, and humanity, because they perpetrate a self-serving, warmongering divide and conquer strategy of permanent revolution engineered to violently pit any would-be rivals against one another as a means to a) peel-off allies for themselves; b) distract the contending parties from the true root of conflict (namely, themselves and their self-serving, Trojan horse ideologies); and c) perpetuate the Judeofascist culture by stirring a carefully controlled enmity against Jews who rebel or refuse to acquiesce to Judeofascist total control of Jewry.

In addition to the "rational" motives of money, power and authority, much of this is done to prepare the ground for the arrival of the mashiach or Jewish messiah, who will supposedly impose Jewish-supremacist rule upon the world, headquartered out of Jerusalem.

Of course, there is no other Jewish messiah coming, and their impatience, frustration, and guilty knowledge is making the Judeofascists increasingly angry, racist, and irrational -- to the point where U.S. tolerance for their eccentric, totalitarian quest has jeopordized much of the world.

Hence, it is here in the U.S. that the Judeofascist menace can, must and will be confronted and stopped, and a White conciousness movement that recognizes that the Judeofascists and their collaborators are the greatest threat to both Western civilization and the world is clearly one of many integral components to that task.

Judeofascists and their evangelical-Zionist stooges vs. Christianity, Western civilization, humanity...

From:
ISRAEL'S UNPOPULARITY MEANS HOPE FOR MANKIND

(National Prayer Network) -- by Rev. Ted Pike --

In a 1962 LOOK article Prime Minister David Ben Gurion prophesied that in the not too distant future the whole world would consist of federated continents under the jurisdiction of Jerusalem (See, ADL Campaigns to Train Hate Prosecutors). How wrong he was! World resistance to Zionism and the Talmudic mandate to dominate the planet is a mighty manifestation of divine grace, completely unexpected by the architects of Jewish supremacism. As a result of many courageous activists speaking out, especially over the past decade, the Zionist conspiracy has been powerfully delayed. Through continued prayer and truth telling, it can be postponed much longer!

As God caused the wheels of Pharaoh’s chariots to mire when they attempted to recapture the fleeing Hebrews, so the rising juggernaut that Scripture calls the “synagogue of Satan” (Rev. 2:9) and Babylon the Great (See, “Babylon the Great” is Israel) is encountering a magnitude of resistance never experienced in Zionism’s 120-year history...

Since Obama's speech last week, a firestorm of protest has arisen, largely from the Republican/evangelical "Israel first" right, denouncing Obama and standing by Netanyahu's declaration that Israel will never concede to the "unrealistic," "indefensible" 1967 borders. Prominent evangelical leaders, such as Tim Wildmon, Dr. James Dobson, Gov. Mike Huckabee, and many others, put a full-page ad in the Jerusalem Post, vowing undying opposition to any division of Israel. (www.IsraelYoureNotAlone.com) It was widely suggested late in the week that Obama's requirements for Israel were in reality more words than substance. Perhaps surprised by the level of opposition from Jews and evangelicals, some predicted his AIPAC speech on Sunday would be milder. Obama in fact retained his basic position.

Why Israel and the Palestinians Can't Find Peace

Israel and evangelical leadership remain united in a shared goal: to regain all of Palestine for the Jewish people. This means ultimate expulsion of antagonistic Arabs. Israel and the evangelicals say an emphatic "No!" to the threat that Palestinian autonomy poses to this dream. Thus, Israel can always be counted on, at the critical moment, to sabotage peace negotiations leading to any division of Israel. Nearly a century ago a separate Arab state was mandated by the 1917 Balfour declaration. In 1948 the UN partition also came to naught, primarily as a result of Jewish terrorism and expulsion of half the Palestinians. Many subsequent proposals have been made but scuttled, primarily by Israeli obfuscation and intransigence. The Israeli/evangelical idea of "peace" today means only one thing: a united Israel from Lebanon to Egypt to Jordan and Syria, without Arabs.

Despite a lot of dust being thrown into the air by Israel's supporters over the weekend, a heartening reality continues undaunted worldwide: Criticism of Israel's injustices is simmering, even boiling over. The Zionist Organization of America, in a recent fundraising letter, gives an accurate overview of the rapidly escalating anger against Israel everywhere.
This new worldwide campaign by universities, media, churches, sports tournaments, public unions, theater people, and the U.N. is really an assault on the right of the self-determination of the Jewish people in their own homeland.

It started with years and years of the Palestine Authority’s verbal attacks and lies against Israel—that has now spread like wildfire around the world.

For example, Salaam Fawaad, the Prime Minister of the Palestinian Authority, recently and falsely proclaimed, ‘ Israel represents a policy of state terror which the Zionist-apartheid state is carrying out against the Palestinians.’ And that’s the so-called ‘moderate’ speaking—not Hamas.

South Africa’s Bishop Tutu said, ‘I’ve been deeply distressed in my visit to the Holy Land. It reminded me so much of what happened to black people in South Africa.’

Professors, like Norman Finkelstein, speak at universities around the world, calling Israel a ‘terrorist state,’ a ‘lunatic state,’ and an ‘insane and satanic state from the boils of hell…committing a holocaust in Gaza.’

Organizations everywhere are calling for a boycott, divestment, and sanctions against Israel, The North American University Professors, academic groups throughout Europe, South Africa and Australia, the Canadian Union of Public Employees, the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, and Lutheran and Presbyterian Churches.

Not surprisingly, 80% of the United Nation Human Rights Council’s resolutions target Israel alone.

England and other countries are even threatening to arrest Deputy Prime Minister General Moshe Yaalon, Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Knesset member Tzipi Livni, and other prominent Israelis for ‘war crimes’ and ‘crimes against humanity.’ These Israeli leaders can no longer travel to those countries.
Criticism of Israel and Jewish control is increasingly vocalized among liberals, including Jewish ones. Many Europeans are angry because of Israel's mistreatment of the people of Gaza. Eastern Europeans particularly believe Jews have too much power, such as in Hungary (70% of the population) and Poland (50%). In Spain, 50% agree.

This is welcome news for lovers of freedom because, if Israel is mired under criticism in the Middle East, it means the Zionist agenda everywhere will be slowed. Once mankind begins to break free from the fatal propaganda vortex into which Israel has sucked us throughout the 20 th century, a new and freeing possibility emerges: openness to the fact that Zionism is not just cruel to Palestinians but also is part of a global Jewish supremacist cancer, inflicting media disinformation, immorality, anti-Christianity, loss of freedom through hate laws, monetary enslavement, and Mideast wars on behalf of Israel. (See, Jews Confirm Big Media is Jewish)

Why are evangelical Christians so out of touch with the winds of change?

Biblical history, as well the parables of Christ, often reveals that people who once received the most truth and light from God have a tendency to become jaded and self-satisfied, forcing God to send others to sound His warnings. So it is today. American Bible Belt pro-Zionism, now dispersed throughout the western world, has become so parasitized by Zionist influence that they not only fail to recognize a mighty deliverance but they demonize it. In contrast, God has allowed liberal, even Jewish anti-Zionist protestors to largely take the lead in sounding a vital, last days warning to the world.

It is indeed a pathetic, tragic commentary on the decline of conscience in popular Christianity when baby-killing, pro-sodomite liberals have compassion on the suffering men, women and children of Gaza and evangelicals have none; instead, they rally behind the oppressors!

Jesus said, “The crane and swallow observe the time of their coming, but My people know not the judgment of the Lord.” (Jer. 8:7). Yet, from the thousands of evangelicals who now visit www.truthtellers.org, I know many lovers of God and freedom are praying fervently against Jewish supremacism and for a stay of judgment upon sinful America. I have always prayed that awakening would break out among God’s people, His church. For 30 years I have been working to make it happen. But how that deliverance comes is God’s business.

Personally, I’ll take deliverance anyway it comes...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

Zionists, including evangelical Judeo-Christian Zionists, are a truly stiff-necked, megalomaniacal, supremacist people. When they are on top and the world sympathetic, they are smug, haughty, arrogant and imperious, and see this as evidence that they are "chosen" by God, who is 100% behind them; when they are down, and the world is against them, they see this as proof that the world has turned against God, and needs to be whipped for its sins.

They truly have confused themselves with God, or see themselves as His stand-in, and if God Himself came down and berated them for their apostacy, they would no doubt condemn him as a heretic.

Yes, they are that far gone, that deep into their megomaniacal self-love and delusions of grandeur.

These delusions make them not only mentally ill, but dangerously so, because Zionism is a powerful, full-blown political ideology with sympathisers and collaborators on both the Left (e.g. the Jewish-owned Democratic Party) and evangelical-Zionist Right that could easily spark another world war.

The Judeo-Christian Zionists are easily dispensed with on their own, as it is self-evident that the traditionally Christian religious basis of Western civilization is historically anti-tribal and anti-Judeofascist (indeed, anti-tribalism and anti-Judeofascism are some of its defining characteristics), and hence it is self-evident that these Judeo-Christian Zionist evangelicals are impostors and frauds, and as enablers of the Judeofascists, or both anti-Christian and anti-Western. But when these masses of useful idiots and their charlatan leaders in the war-profiteering complex are combined with the powerful Judeofascists themselves, who have all manner of influence over Hollywood, media, and Wall Street, well, the resulting Zionist amalgamation is incredibly poisonous and dangerous indeed.

One of the ways that Zionists deceive the West is to present Israel and the Jewish people as a tiny, besieged island of sanity amidst a sea of angry and insane Arabs and Muslims, and that without its partisans in America, poor little Israel would be eradicated.

This is a false construct worthy of a Hollywood production, as it is nuclear-armed Israel and its Israel-first puppets in Washington that are throwing their Zionist weight around the Middle East, and the Arab and Muslim masses who are divided, and generally suppressed under the yoke of authoritarian dictators -- many of whom are backed by the Zionist Machiavellians who seek to socially engineer them out of the Islamic beliefs just as the weaker elements of the West have been largely socially engineered out of their pro-traditional Christian and pro-Western civilization, anti-Judeofascist ones.

So let's no longer view Zionism as a narrow, particularistic, Jewish cult, but rather as a broad-based ideology similar to Communism, only headquartered in Jerusalem instead of Moscow, and one hell bent on snuffing out traditional Christianity, Western civilization, Islamic civilization, and the world entirely unless it acknowledges that Zionism is "God," bows before it, and agrees to become its slave, just as the U.S. Military has been enslaved by treasonous Zionist ideologues into doing racist Israel's Jewish supremacist bidding throughout the Islamic world.

It's time to take back Christianity, Western civilization, and Western moral authority from these charlatans, frauds, interlopers, parasites and impostors.

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Bernard-Henri Levy and Ben Stein inanely rush to defense of Dominique Strauss-Kahn; Gee, I wonder why?

From:
Daily Show: La Cage Aux Fools
(TheDailyShow.com) --

Slavering, blind support for Judeofascist state of paramount importance to wealthy, opportunistic, "liberal"-poseur U.S. Jewry

From:
Top Jewish Americans ponder support for Obama

(Reuters) -- by Eric Johnson --

Some prominent Jewish Americans are rethinking their support for President Barack Obama's 2012 re-election bid after he effectively called on Israel to give back territory it has occupied since 1967 to Palestinians.

The backlash after Obama's keynote speech on the Middle East has Democratic Party operatives scrambling to mollify the Jewish community as the president prepares to seek a second term in the White House.

Obama on Thursday called for any new Palestinian state to respect the borders as they were in 1967, prompting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to tell him bluntly that his vision of how to achieve Middle East peace was unrealistic.

"He has in effect sought to reduce Israel's negotiation power and I condemn him for that," former New York Mayor Ed Koch told Reuters.

Koch said he might not campaign or vote for Obama if Republicans nominate a pro-Israel candidate who offers an alternative to recent austere budgetary measures backed by Republicans in Congress.

Koch donated $2,300 to Obama's campaign in 2008, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission.

"I believed that then-Senator Obama would be as good as John McCain based on his statements at the time and based on his support of Israel. It turns out I was wrong," he said.

Despite the stormy reaction to Obama's remarks, some commentators noted talk of the 1967 borders was nothing new.

"This has been the basic idea for at least 12 years. This is what Bill Clinton, Ehud Barak and Yasser Arafat were talking about at Camp David, and later, at Taba," Jeffrey Goldberg wrote on The Atlantic website.

"This is what George W. Bush was talking about with Ariel Sharon and Ehud Olmert. So what's the huge deal here?"...

But Morton Klein, president of the Zionist Organization of America, wrote an open letter to the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, calling on it to cancel a scheduled address by Obama to the lobby group on Sunday...MORE...LINK

Insatiably greedy Israel refuses to draw its borders so it can keep expanding, and then has the chutzpah to whine about its "security"

From:
The Strategic Ally Myth

(AntiWar.com) -- by Philip Giraldi --

It is difficult to understand why anyone would take Mort Zuckerman seriously. He is a New York based but Canadian born Israel firster who made a fortune in real estate before buying The New York Daily News and the US News and World Report. He now fancies himself as a leading journalist and political commentator. Zuckerman is frequently spotted on the television talking head circuit where he dispenses analysis of international events that could have been crafted in Tel Aviv or Herzliya, where the Israeli intelligence service Mossad has its headquarters.

Zuckerman’s latest contribution to international harmony is a lengthy piece in the US News & World Report entitled “Israel Is a Key Ally and Deserves US Support.” It is a propaganda piece that promotes one of the most persistent fictions put out by the mainstream media, that the relationship with Israel somehow benefits the United States. To give the devil his due, it is not often that an article in a national publication includes an out-and-out lie in its first few words, but Zuckerman succeeds in doing just that. As he is a smart man who went to Harvard Law School before becoming a propagandist for Israel, he must know that words have meanings. But the significance of the word “ally” must have somehow eluded his grasp. Israel is not now and never has been an ally of the United States. As Zuckerman is a lawyer he should know that to be an ally requires an agreement in writing that spells out the conditions and reciprocity of the relationship. Israel has never been an ally of any country because it would force it to restrain its aggressive behavior, requiring consultation with its ally before attacking other nations. It is also unable to define its own borders, which have been expanding ever since it was founded in 1948. Without defined borders it is impossible to enter into an alliance because most alliances are established so that one country will come to the aid of another if it is attacked, which normally means having its territorial integrity violated. Since Israel intends to continue expanding its borders it cannot commit to an alliance with anyone and has, in fact, rebuffed several bids by Washington to enter into some kind of formal arrangement.

The article’s spin begins almost immediately thereafter in paragraph one, where the reader is informed that “the Israelis have agreed to [a Palestinian state] in principle.” Zuckerman conveniently overlooks that Tel Aviv has in fact obstructed every move toward creation of a Palestinian state because that would stop its continued colonization of the West Bank and Jerusalem. He then proceeds to lay it on really thick in the next two paragraphs, where one learns that the Palestinians need to “do what the Israelis have done for decades, which is to declare…that both sides have genuine claims to this land,” that the “Palestinian leadership has all along made an honorable peace impossible,” and that the Palestinians are not prepared to live with an Israeli state along their borders. The Palestinians also “beat the drums of hate” and only the Israelis guarantee freedom of religion in Jerusalem. Without wishing to be too contentious, it is safe to say that everything Zuckerman writes blaming the Palestinians can easily be disputed and should be challenged.

Zuckerman then launches into one of his major themes, that poor little Israel, always willing to take risks and do what is right in the cause of peace, has been betrayed by Washington. Zuckerman opines that Tel Aviv is right to hold on to the West Bank because if it gives it up Israel will not be “secure and defensible” against Arab terrorism. He also provides a hagiography of Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, who apparently is “serious about making peace” and has done lots of good things for the Palestinians that he is not given credit for (except by Zuckerman). Bibi is also reported to be “disturbingly” under-appreciated by the White House.

According to Zuckerman, Netanyahu and Israel are “not to blame for trouble in the Middle East,” and one also learns that “The Islamists are not enemies of America because of Israel. They are fighting America because they see the whole West…as antithetical to their own beliefs.” Yes, this is the new version of they hate us because of our freedom bumper sticker. Israeli bestiality toward the Arab population that it dominates, seen on television nightly all over the world except in the US, has nothing to do with it...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
Israel and its smirking, Jewish-Zionist "American" agents: fundamentally deceitful, fundamentally dishonest