Sunday, February 09, 2014

History Speaks: How the Zionists played both the left and the right to incite the 20th Century wars of annihilation that nearly destroyed the West

I can't guaranty the veracity of each and every one of the following quotes, but notwithstanding a historical fabrication here or there, their totality is a damning portrait of Zionism and organized Jewry's possibly decisive role in inciting both World War I and World War II as a greedy and opportunistic, premeditated means of driving a knife through the heart of Christendom and Western Civilization.

It's also a damning portrait of all of the crass and like-minded money-worshipers, egoists and gangsters of both left and right who would collaborate with Zionist Jewry under this ideology or that, and who would sell their souls, sell out the West, and sell out the human race to Zionism's messianic agenda of doctrinaire Judeo-supremacy by way of permanent revolution and perpetual war. -- C.M.


***

"The race struggle is the primal one, and the class struggle secondary. The last dominating race is the German."

"The Christian...imagines the better future of the human species...in the image of heavenly joy...We, on the other hand, will have this heaven on earth."

"The Messianic era is the present age, which began to germinate with the teachings of Spinoza, and finally came into historical existence with the great French Revolution." "To this coming cult, Judaism alone holds the key." (Jewish Communist and Labor Zionist Moses Hess, 1812-1875)


"I fear the Jewish banks with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America, and use it to systematically corrupt modern civilization. The Jews will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos that the earth should become their inheritance." (Prussian statesman Otto von Bismarck, 1815 - 1898)


"Russia is now asphyxiating the Jews. It does not dare to offend the nations by blood spilling, so it is slowly, but surely grinding out the lives of 6,000,000 Jews." (Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, New York Tribune, September 11th, 1912, page 9)


"I know who caused the war [WWI]: German-Jewish bankers." (Henry Ford, 1915)


"Israel won the war [WW I]; we made it; we thrived on it; we profited from it. It was our supreme revenge on Christianity." (The Jewish Ambassador from Austria to London, Count Mensdorf, 1918).


"As far back as 1880 the Anglo-American occult leaders, directing the political leaders, knew about the coming World War and prepared for it. The German leaders knew nothing, and would not take warning, that is why they lost! The physical war was easily won by England, but it will be followed by a spiritual war between East and West... Germany must fulfill her mission, otherwise the European civilization will be ruined." (Rudolph Steiner, lecture given at Stuttgart in 1918; Light-Bearers of Darkness, by Inquire Within, pp. 78-79).


"This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing...There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, it is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders...Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people...The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with the villainies, which are now being perpetrated. (Winston Churchill, Sunday Illustrated Herald, London, England, February 8, 1920)


"The German revolution is the achievement of the Jews; the Liberal Democratic parties have a great number of Jews as their leaders, and the Jews play a predominant role in the high government offices." (The Jewish Tribune, July 5, 1920)


"In no place so much as in Germany do the Jews [in finance, industries and commerce] hold such an important, almost preponderant part. Therefore it might easily be said that all the newly-rich and war- profiteer, is an ancient of a thousand years...The immense majority of the influentials in Austrian Socialism were and are still Jews (1921)...finally, in a certain sense the Jews oppose themselves to non-Jews, above all in the rìle they play as initiators and actors in the extreme-left parties as internationalism opposed to nationalism." (Le Probläme Juic, (1921), Georges Batault).


"What I oppose most is the international Jewish money power that is met in every war. That is what I oppose - a power that has no country and that can order the young men of all countries out to death." (Henry Ford, 1925)


"All Jews world wide -- declared war on the Third Reich." (The London Daily Express, Front Page Story, 3/24/1933).


"The Israeli people around the world declare economic and financial war against Germany. Fourteen million Jews stand together as one man, to declare war against Germany. The Jewish wholesaler will forsake his firm, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his commerce and the pauper his pitiful shed in order to join together in a holy war against Hitler's people." - Daily Express (March 24, 1933)


"...Jabotinsky insisted that all energies be expended to force the Congress to join the boycott movement. Nothing less than a 'merciless fight' would be acceptable, cried Jabotinsky. 'The present Congress is duty bound to put the Jewish problem in Germany before the entire world...(We [Jews] must) destroy, destroy, destroy them, not only with the boycott, but politically, supporting all existing forces against them to isolate Germany from the civilized world...our enemy [Germany] must be destroyed." (Speech by Vladimir Jabotinsky, a Polish Jews, on June 16, 1933)


"Each of you, Jew and Gentile alike, who has not already enlisted in this sacred war should do so now and here. It is not sufficient that you should buy no goods made in Germany. You must refuse to deal with any merchant or shopkeeper who sells any German-made goods or who patronises German ships or shipping.... we will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends." - Samuel Undermeyer, in a Radio Broadcast on WABC, New York (August 6, 1933, reported in the New York Times, August 7, 1933)


"Joining with Samuel Untermeyer in calling for a war against Germany, Bernard Baruch, at the same time, was promoting preparations for war against Germany. 'I emphasised that the defeat of Germany and Japan and their elimination from world trade would give Britain a tremendous opportunity to swell her foreign commerce in both volume and profit.'" - Baruch, The Public Years, by Bernard M. Baruch (p.347)


"Hitler will have no war (does not want war), but we will force it on him, not this year, but soon." - Emil Ludwig Cohn in Les Annales, June, 1934 (also quoted in his book The New Holy Alliance).


"The fight against Germany has now been waged for months by every Jewish community, on every conference, in all labor unions and by every single Jew in the world. There are reasons for the assumption that our share in this fight is of general importance. We shall start a spiritual and material war of the whole world against Germany. Germany is striving to become once again a great nation, and to recover her lost territories as well as her colonies. But our Jewish interests call for the complete destruction of Germany..." (Valadimir Jabotinsky, in Mascha Rjetsch, January, 1934)


"Judea declares War on Germany." (Daily Express headline, March 24, 1934)


"In [pre-WW II] Berlin, for example, when the Nazis came to power, 50.2% of the lawyers were Jews...48% of the doctors were Jews. The Jews owned the largest and most important Berlin newspapers, and made great inroads on the educational system." (The House That Hitler Built, by Stephen Roberts, 1937).


"Germany is the enemy of Judaism and must be pursued with deadly hatred. The goal of Judaism of today is: a merciless campaign against all German peoples and the complete destruction of the nation. We demand a complete blockade of trade, the importation of raw materials stopped, and retaliation towards every German, woman and child." (Jewish professor A. Kulischer, October, 1937)


"Before the end of the year, an economic bloc of England, Russia, France and the U.S.A will be formed to bring the German and Italian economic systems to their knees." - Paul Dreyfus, La Vie de Tanger (May 15, 1938)


"Our fight against Germany must be carried to the limit of what is possible. Israel has been attacked. Let us, therefore, defend Israel! Against the awakened Germany, we put an awakened Israel. And the world will defend us." (Jewish author Pierre Creange in his book Epitres aux Juifs, 1938)


"Its our task to mercilessly declare war to Germany, the public enemy number one." - Bernhard Lecache, President of the Jewish World League (9. November 1938)


"The millions of Jews who live in America, England and France, North and South Africa, and, not to forget those in Palestine, are determined to bring the war of annihilation against Germany to its final end." (The Jewish newspaper, Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederland, September 13, 1939)


"I wish to confirm in the most explicit manner, the declaration which I and my colleagues made during the last months, and especially in the last week: that the Jews "stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies." Our urgent desire is to give effect to these declarations. We wish to do so in a way entirely consonant with the general scheme of British action, and therefore would place ourselves, in matters big and small, under the co-ordinating direction of His Majesty's Government. The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources, etc." - Chaim Weizmann, President of the World Jewish Congress, Head of the Jewish Agency and later President of Israel, the London Times, September 5, 1939, and the London Jewish Chronicle, September 8, 1939.


"Already the pitch has been reached in Great Britain where it is considered bigoted or reactionary to do other than praise the Jews for their industry and ability. Few papers will risk any attack on the Jews, however well-founded, for fear of appearing even distantly anti-Semitic."(Propaganda in the Next War, Sidney Robertson, p. 92; War! War! War!, Cincinnatus, p, 192).


"It has been estimated that of the world Jew population of approximately fifteen millions, no fewer than five million are in the United States. Twenty-five percent of the inhabitants of New York are Jews. During the Great War we bought off this huge American Jewish public by the promise of the Jewish National Home in Palestine, held by Ludendorff to be the master stroke of Allied propaganda as it enabled us not only to appeal to Jews in America but to Jews in Germany as well." (Propaganda in the Next War, Sidney Robertson, p. 147; War! War! War!, Cincinnatus, p. 192).


"The Jewish World Congress has been at perpetual war with Germany for seven years." - Maurice Perlzweig, Chief of the British Section of the World Jewish Congress February 26, 1940, in an address according to the Toronto Evening Telegram, quoted by Dr. Hans Riegelmann in: UN, 8/83, p. 4.


"NEW WORLD ORDER PLEDGED TO JEWS" (by British War Cabinet Member) -- New York Times headline, October 6, 1940


"When the National Socialists and their friends cry or whisper that this [the war] is brought about by Jews, they are perfectly right." - The Jewish magazine Sentinel of Chicago (8 October 1940)


"We managed to drag the United States into the First World War and if they (the US) do what we demand in regards to Palestine and the Jewish armed forces, then we can get the Jews in the USA to drag the United States into this one (the Second World War) too." - Weizmann to Chuchill (September 1941)


"Whenever an American or a Filipino fell at Bataan or Corregidor or at any other of the now historic spots where MacArthur's men put up their remarkable fight, their survivors could have said with truth: 'The real reason that boy went to his death, was because Hitler's anti-Semitic movement succeeded in Germany.'" (The American Hebrew, July 24, 1942).


"The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism." - Rabbi Felix Mendlesohn, Chicago Sentinel (October 8, 1942)


"We are not denying and we are not afraid to confess, this war is our war and that it is waged for the liberation of Jewry...Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry. We are not only giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based. We are not only providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going. The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. And we are the Trojan Horses in the enemy's fortress. Thousands of Jews living in Europe constitute the principal factor in the destruction of our enemy. There, our front is a fact and the most valuable aid for victory." (Chaim Weizmann, President of the World Jewish Congress, in a Speech on December 3, 1942, in New York City).


"SIX MILLIONS MURDERED. The Soviet State Publishing House is preparing the publication of another "Black Book," a documentary record of the German massacre of approximately six million European Jews. ... According to the Soviet editors, the Germans killed between five and six million Russian, Polish and Western European Jews, and an additional half million are being murdered in Hungary now." -- (The Palestine Post, November 28th, 1944)


"Played golf with Joe Kennedy (U.S. Ambassador to Britain). He says that Chamberlain stated that America and world Jewry forced England into World War II." - James Forrestal, Secretary of the Navy (later Secretary of Defense), Diary, December 27, 1945 entry.


The war time Premier (Winston Churchill) said he thought the problem of a National Jewish Home in Palestine was too big to be handled by one single nation alone. Favors joint inquiry. "I am strongly in favor of a joint inquiry by the United States and Great Britain," adding "As you probably know I am a Zionist from the beginning." (Philadelphia Record, January 11, 1946; And Men Wept, by Catherine Palfrey Baldwin, p. 83).


"Germany must be turned into a waste land, as happened there during the 30-year War." - Das Morgenthau-Tagebuch, The Morgenthau Dairy (p. 11)


"The Morgenthau Plan for Germany ... became part of the Potsdam Agreement, a solemn declaration of policy and undertaking for action ... signed by the United States of America, Great Britain and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics." - New York Post (Nov. 24, 1947)


"One day President Roosevelt told me that he was asking publicly for suggestions about what the war should be called. I said at once, "The Unnecessary War." There never was a war more easy to stop than that which has just wrecked what was left of the world from the previous struggle." - Winston Churchill Memoirs, The Second World War, Volume I, The Gathering Storm (1948)


"Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. "We've been so nice to them"; and from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth." Now, Nahum Sokolow -- all the great leaders, the big names that you read about in connection with Zionism today -- they, in 1919, 1920, '21, '22, and '23, they wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled with their statements -- that "the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by our intercession and bringing the United States into the war against them [for purposes of Zionism]." The Jews themselves admitted that...There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious...When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed." (Benjamin H. Freedman,  1961 speech at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C.)


"Step by step, I have arrived at the conviction that the aims of Communism in Europe are sinister and fatal. At the Nuremberg Trials, I, together with my Russian colleague, condemned Nazi Aggression and Terror. I believe now that Hitler and the German People did not want war. But we, (England), declared war on Germany, intent on destroying it, in accordance with our principle of Balance of Power, and we were encouraged by the [Zionist] Americans around Roosevelt. We ignored Hitler's pleading, not to enter into war. Now we are forced to realize that Hitler was right. He offered us the co-operation of Germany: instead, since 1945, we have been facing the immense power of the Soviet Empire. I feel ashamed and humiliated to see that the aims we accused Hitler of, are being relentless pursued now, only under a different label." (Sir Hartley Shawcross, the lead British prosecutor at the Nuremberg War Crimes tribunal, in a speech at Stourbridge, March 16/84, AP).

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

The Zionist sect of Protestantism is not only Judeophile, but nearly as anti-Catholic as is Judaism; What role might this have played in the assassination of our first Catholic president, JFK?

(Introduction by Chris Moore) --

This is an interesting discussion vis-a-vis The new anti-Semitism, and the campaign to silence American critics of Israel by Jeff Warner and Dick Platkin on the Mondoweiss blog regarding the authors' claim that

Jewish students and faculty were once victims of real anti-Semitism on American campuses from the early 20th Century through the early 1970s in the form of admission quotas, glass ceilings on high academic and administrative positions, and discriminatory practices by fraternities and sororities.
The discussion took place in the Comments section of the blog. I found it interesting because I too was skeptical of the veracity of this particular claim, and suspect it's just another of those mythical Jewish victim shtick narratives that gets handed down over generations, exaggerated a little bit more each time it's handed off (kind of like what became known fist as the Holocaust and then to distinguish the Jewish angle even further, the Shoah...the Jewish persecution aspect being barely even mentioned in mainline, WWII-era histories, but exaggerated by self-serving Zionists over time to nearly become the casus-belli of "The Good War" today).

Of course, these same types of mythical, Zionist victim-and-vengeance narratives date to the Old Testament/Torah, as well.

The discussion also evolved to touch upon the fact that certain Zionist strains of Protestantism are as much anti-Catholic as they are philo-Semitic/Judeophile.

I've long wondered if it wasn't an anti-Catholic, Zionist strain of Protestantism (perhaps in conjunction with self-evidently Catholic-hating Zionist Jews who forever declare that "Hitler was a Catholic!" to anyone who will listen) that instigated the assassination of America's first Catholic President, John F. Kennedy, in part because he was not on board the exaggerated "evil Germany" and "evil Western Civilization" Zionist-Marxist-Imperialist victim-shtick narrative, and in fact in the wake of WWII expressed tremendous compassion for the German people, and was highly critical of Russian and British looting, pillaging and raping, and even somewhat critical of U.S. policy.

No doubt the warped, vengeance-seeking, Zionist strain of Protestantism always held that against him.

Here's part of the Comments section discussion that emphasizes this Zionist anti-Catholicism in particular:


Madrid says:
August 26, 2013 at 1:56 pm

Jews were never victims of anti-Semitism on campuses in the 70′s, 60′s, or probably the 50′s either. Just a ridiculous statement. In fact, there were no real quotas affecting Jewish students during these years– there were attempts at lots of elite universities to make them more nationally focused universities, by taking students from the other 40 states of the union, not huddled around the Northeast corridor. That is, there was positive discrimination for kids from the states that people in the Northeast have always hated (Alabama, Arkansas, Texas, Oklahoma, etc), and as a result, many Jews living in the Northeast complained that this was pro-Christian discrimination or anti-Jewish discrimination in the same way that whites currently complain about affirmative action.

There was and is only one true religious discrimination that has gone on at this country’s elite universities and that is anti-Catholic discrimination, and Jewish professors and students as well as Protestant profs and students have done their part to stoke the flames against Catholicism and Catholics from the late 19th century to the present. More recently there is a fervent anti-Muslim fervor among lots of atheists and Jewish profs at elite universities– the same type of people that are anti-Catholic are often equally anti-Muslim.

Ellen says:
August 26, 2013 at 4:01 pm

Madrid, similar point I made below. And I do not know why the authors rolled that old dog out in their essay. Either they have an interest in keeping the untrue meme alive or they have been brainwashed to believe it and keep on repeating it. I think the latter.

I think it was Galbraith who said that is is still and always PC in America to be completely anti Catholic.

All that is really besides the point — and so what — as what I wonder is why it seems there is a celebration, even a nurturing of ideas of anti Jewish in history as a part of Jewish identity? What other group does that? And why would any group do so?

How often do we hear what is really a narcissistic claim “we’ve been persecuted for 2000 years?”
---
Donald says:
August 26, 2013 at 6:23 pm

This seems like a factual question which someone ought to be able to answer–was there discrimination in colleges against Jews as late as the early 70′s? I was initially surprised it could have survived to that late date, but I don’t know–certainly black Americans faced much worse discrimination right through the middle 60′s. I don’t think the authors of the post simply made this up.

The Jewish virtual library has a short article on discrimination against Jews at Harvard, which lasted from the early 20′s to the late 30′s. Part of the motivation was anti-semitism, or pandering to the anti-semitism of students (which isn’t quite how the Harvard official put it), while part of it seems to have been a desire for geographical diversity–sort of an affirmative action program for rural white Christians from North Dakota, so to speak. This is what Madrid mentioned, but from what the jewishvirtuallibrary says there was also anti-semitism at work. I see no reason to doubt it.

Harvard

“What other group does that? And why would any group do so?”

Um, everyone does it. Claiming victim status gives you the moral high ground, or that’s how it’s supposed to work. I think this goes back to the days when Christians bragged about their martyrs, first by pagans and later by other Christians (Fox’s Book of the Martyrs comes to mind) and it hasn’t stopped. American Christians have about as little to complain about as any group in history–just some ridicule by secularists in Hollywood sometimes–and evangelicals sometimes talk like mass persecution is just around the corner. Every group that has suffered anything claims victim status, some with more justification than others. Even white males in the US get into the act sometimes. Whether the attempt to grab moral high ground is justified is just something one has to figure out on a case-by-case basis.

Ellen says:
August 26, 2013 at 6:54 pm

“Um, everyone does it. ” No, not at all. As for the rest of your post, it is too banal and ridiculous to respond to, but briefly.

There are many groups/individuals/ethnic identities who no not narcissisticly (sic) shroud themselves as victims, fearful of the other and build a colonial enterprises based on the ideas of victimology. That is, after all, essentially weak and pathetic.

I’ve mentioned this before: I witnessed Muslin women in the Balkans removing a plaque placed in the memory of the horrific rapes and killings in a sports stadium. This was not the self identity they wanted to cultivate and nurture.

As for the Christian fear about mass persecution right around the corner: can you source such claims?
Madrid says:
August 26, 2013 at 7:07 pm

Your problem, and the problem of most educated Americans, is that they know relatively little about the history of religion in the west or in the US. A review of that history shows that most of the charges of American anti-Semitism at elite American universities, while certainly valid in some cases, were exaggerated.

Here are a few salient facts about the history of religious elites in England and the US after the seventeenth century that should make things clearer:

1. After 1649, when the Puritans and the Levellers got control of England, the country became very philo-Semitic, something which did not change with the restoration of the king in 1660. It wasn’t solely evidenced by Cromwell allowing free immigration of Dutch and German Jews. It was also that the Puritans thought of themselves as the New Jews– the new Chosen nation. This was caused partly by the Erastian political theories that had begun in the earlier century, but it was also due to the new focus on the Old Testament by the Puritans, rather than the New Testament. The Puritans also viewed their own “anti-idolatry” tenets and their Bibliophilic nature as something that was similar to Judaism’s reverence for scripture and iconoklastic approach to idol-worship as well as antithetical to Catholic reverence for saints and Catholic icons.

2. During this period and later, it was often said by English and American Protestants of all denominations that it was far more important to fight the Catholics than the Jews or the Muslims. Indeed, even Queen Elizabeth had tried to establish strong diplomatic relations with the Sultan of the Ottoman empire, at a time when Europe was seriously threatened with wholesale invasion by the Ottomans. This is because Anti-papism was a fundamental aspect of Protestantism (and still is to some degree). In other words, it was similar to the trinity or belief in Christ’s resurrection. It was a basic requirement of being a good protestant, and thus expression of anti-papism became a fundamental aspect of the religion. This never occurred with anti-Semitism– in fact, many Puritan sects tried early on to emulate the Jewish prohibition on eating pork, for example, while everything to do with Catholic traditions was to be rejected.

3. The reason why English and American Protestants discriminated against Catholics is that they considered the Pope to be another temporal ruler, which he was to a certain extent– he governed the papal states, supposedly from the time of Constantine’s Donation. And they thought that Catholics recognition of the Pope meant that Catholics were ipso facto traitors to the country. At least before the state of Israel was founded, there was no evidence of Jewish dual loyalty for American Protestants, so there was no reason to make accusations of dual loyalty during the first 5 decades of the 20th century.

So while, yes, there was certainly anti-Semitism, Jews were accepted in the historically Protestant universities of the Northeast well before Catholics were accepted at those places. A good example of how serious anti-Catholicism was at the university level is the contempt that the University of Notre Dame encountered, when Knute Rockne tried to lobby for ND to join the Big Ten conference. Even though Notre Dame had rivalries with several of the Big Ten schools, administrators at Michigan and Chicago said very publicly that in no uncertain terms would there ever be a Catholic school in the Big Ten. There never has been such outward hostility to any other religion in the US, including Judaism, with the exception of recent hostility towards Islam.

Donald says:
August 26, 2013 at 10:15 pm

“No, not at all. As for the rest of your post, it is too banal and ridiculous to respond to, but briefly.”

I didn’t expect that sort of nastiness, but perhaps you are so sure of yourself the arrogance just comes spilling out. It’s astonishing that you’ve not heard people say anything about this before. Banal, yes, because it’s obvious, except maybe in your world where only, it seems, one particular group uses past discrimination in current political arguments. I see men complain about feminists, feminists complain about men, whites complain about blacks, evangelicals complaining about gays (I literally heard this last night). Somehow you must have missed the whole Zimmerman/Martin thing. Claiming victimhood and making fun of people claiming victimhood has been part of US politics for decades.

“As for the Christian fear about mass persecution right around the corner: can you source such claims?”

link

That took me about thirty seconds.

I knew about this personally and again, anyone as arrogant as you should have known this.

Donald says:
August 26, 2013 at 10:22 pm

Oh, Ellen, here’s some more commentary by a well-known liberal evangelical blogger it would have taken you thirty seconds to find.

link

Maybe you’re not American. That would be some sort of excuse.

Donald says:
August 26, 2013 at 10:53 pm

Yet another link, Ellen. Maybe you should reconsider why you would have ever thought that self-dramatization and imagined victimhood was the property of one particular group, when evidence contradicting this was all around you. I suppose you somehow missed how some of the opponents of gay marriage see themselves as victims.

link

Donald says:
August 26, 2013 at 11:19 pm

One final one–this from a conservative Christian blogger (Michael Spencer) who died of cancer some years ago, but started to become critical of his subculture. He was fairly well known on the evangelical internet. This post is from 2007. Note that he takes for granted the fact that American evangelicals harbor delusions of being persecuted–

link

Ellen says:
August 27, 2013 at 4:15 am

Donald, my point was that not “everyone does it.” Even if that were true, in no way does it minimize the self centered, and ultimately weak, manipulative tactics of cultivating victimology for gain. Working up claims of “new anti semitism” is an example of just that.

While you give current examples of a similar (but not the same) being done by self identified groups — feminists, gays, some evangelical Christians, you do point it out as wrong and delusional. And so is the politics of a phony “new antisemitism. ” (Or Judeophobia, more correctly.) And not one of those self identified groups has as much influence in government and policy as Zionists in the USA.

Your attempt was to minimize the manipulative nurturing of ideas of new antisemitism.

And you continue to do that with links, for example, to the utterings of an aging Evagelical fringe internet character or the sometimes qustionable identity politics of gays and feminists.

The dishonest diversion of “everyone does it” to minimize and distract from the truth at hand is abbhorent. That made me angry, and I do apologize if it came across as an attack of you. It is an attack of the argument and dishonest methods.

Saturday, July 06, 2013

Jewish-Americans, over 80% of them now Zionists, are today the wealthiest caste in the U.S. The richer they get, the poorer average Americans become.

(compiled by Chris Moore)

YNet News: "Since the mass immigration some 100 years ago, Jews have become richest religious group in American society. "

Jewish Telegraph Agency: "At least 139 of the Forbes 400 are Jewish"

Pew Forum: "Income Distribution Within U.S. Religious Groups "

New York Times: "The most affluent of the major religions — including secularism — is Reform Judaism. Sixty-seven percent of Reform Jewish households made more than $75,000 a year at the time the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life collected the data, compared with only 31 percent of the population as a whole. "

Jspace: "The Jewish Billionaires of Forbes"

Forbes: "These Americans Have Made The Most Billions Under Obama"

ucsc.edu: "In the United States, wealth is highly concentrated in a relatively few hands. As of 2010, the top 1% of households (the upper class) owned 35.4% of all privately held wealth, and the next 19% (the managerial, professional, and small business stratum) had 53.5%, which means that just 20% of the people owned a remarkable 89%, leaving only 11% of the wealth for the bottom 80% (wage and salary workers)."

TheSocietyPages.org: "The income gap between the rich and the poor is larger in the U.S. than in most other industrialized countries...the top 1/100th of 1% of earners in the U.S. brings home 6% of the total income earned in the U.S.  This represents the largest proportion of total income since at least 1913, and is the endpoint in a trajectory of rising inequality that began in the early 1980s."

Forbes: "How Income Inequality Is Damaging the U.S."
-------------------------

Over 80% of Jewish-Americans are now Zionists.

Free enterprise works so long as the government represents ALL of the people and not just the wealthiest elites, particularly when that elite is dominated by an insatiable greedy network of Zionist tribal-fascists and anti-democratic, Judeo-supremacist fanatics.

Today's America is not the dynamic, upwardly mobile, free enterprise, fair-play America of our forebears that created the largest Middle Class in the history of mankind, and is well on its way to becoming a plutocracy and oligarchy at war with its own people (in addition to much of the world). 

Insular, tribal-minded, self-serving Zionist elites are the anti-thesis of America and democracy, and the increasing decline and fall of the U.S. economy into a Zionist caste-system demonstrates exactly how hostile and anti-American these kosher-fascists truly are. -- C.M.

Wednesday, July 03, 2013

Viral video of gay Jewish "atheist" on rant at U.C. Berkeley exposes true anti-democracy motives and disturbed psychology of "goyim"-hating Diaspora Zionists



A lot of people seem to have a difficult time coming to terms with why Gentile Beltway elites are so firm in their alliance with Jewish Zionists, be they Israeli or Diaspora Zionist, right-wing or left-wing (like the left-wing, anti-democracy and anti-Christian, Zionist-indoctrinated homosexual Jew ranting and raving in the video above about Christian and "goyim" persecution of Jews and homosexuals).

In addition to a common culture of greed and money-worship, another component of the answer is most certainly the crypto culture of buggering favored by the Anglo-Imperialists (a culture that re-grew in America over the generations down the line from the vigorous WASPs that founded the country, once Washington became corrupted). This crypto culture of buggering is also common among Zionist Jewry, which is why there is such a disproportionate number of homosexual Jews, and is likely responsible for the creation of the poor creature railing above.

Not only are a lot of the decayed and corrupted Beltway elites on left and right in bed with Christian-hating Jews politically, but they're in bed with them physically and psychologically as well, and engaged in all manner of physical and intellectual buggering.

This common, perverted, anti-Christian, anti-Western and anti-democratic pathology to "bugger the world" via Imperialism (now Globalism) and Zionism is an outgrowth of their common sub-culture of buggering. 

And just as the Jew ranting in the video above sees democracy as "mob rule" and opposition to his conflated personal-political Jewish/Zionist/homosexual identity and agenda as evidence of bigotry and persecution, the Beltway neolibs and neocons and those subservient to them see opposition to Jewish Zionists, and to their common world-buggering, Zionist-Globalist agenda, as an attack on them personally...as an attack on their essence.

Don't fool yourselves. The crazed psychology of the Jew in the video above may be extreme, but its elitist, anti-democratic, persecution-complex thought process is no doubt undertaken by nearly all Diaspora Zionist Jews, queer or not, and also in the conscious and sub-conscious of the Judaized, anti-Christian, imperialist-minded, world-buggering Gentile elites in bed with them. -- C.M.

Thursday, June 27, 2013

The West's blacklisting of Nobel literary giant Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's masterpiece on Jews and Russia has left the field to David Duke and White nationalism

(By Chris Moore) --

"You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators." -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

Thus quotes David Duke in the introduction to his new bookThe Secret Behind Communism. Duke says Solzhenitsyn made that statement to him in a 2002 meeting in Moscow.

"The revolution occurred in Russia, and although a percentage of Russians participated in it, it was not a "Russian Revolution," declares Duke in The Secret Behind Communism.
"It was led by an alienated, non-Russian, Jewish ethnic minority who hated Russia, Russians, and the Tsar for their alleged anti-Semitism.  Their fellow tribalists around the world financed and their shock troops executed the brutal takeover of the Russian government.  Upon achieving total power, their deep, psychopathic, racist hatred became manifest in the greatest human slaughter of all time.  Any historian who has studied modern communism from its ideological origins in Karl Marx and Moses Hess, through the mass dispossession, forced starvations, and Gulags of the 20th century, is aware that communists are the real world champions of mass murder.  There is no historical dispute that communist regimes killed many times more innocents than any other regime in history, including Hitler's Germany.  But unlike members of that National Socialist regime, the greatest mass murderers of all time have not been hunted down across the face of the Earth.  They have not faced trial for their horrific crimes against humanity.  Perhaps even more importantly they have never faced the court of popular revulsion.  Why?  Because these communist perpetrators have been shielded by their tribal brethren who have an inordinate influence on media, academia and governments. The truth about the Jewish supremacist role in the creation, execution, and maintenance of world Communism, and the 'Russian' Revolution in particular remains little-known.  The reason for this is simple: The Jewish supremacist tribalists who influence major media in the West make sure that almost nothing is said about the fact that Jews, along with organized Jewish support worldwide, not only created Communism, but were the leaders who brought it into such grim reality.  They were at the nexus of the greatest slaughter and mass human suffering in history."
Duke goes on to provide some background as to why he wrote The Secret Behind Communism, saying that one reason is because Solzhenitsyn's book, Two Hundred Years Together, has been blacklisted in the West, and so Duke has borrowed heavily from the work so it can see the light of day. (I'm not sure where Duke got his own English translation, but I can tell you the White nationalist Occidental Observer, to its credit, managed to get several chapters translated into English, which it posted on its website).

Duke continues:
When I met Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), he had just published his last work, called Two Hundred Years Together (2001). It was about the Jewish experience in Russia, and contained three chapters devoted to discussing the Jewish role in the revolutionary genocide and secret police purges of Soviet Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution of October 1917. I waited ten years in vain for the book to be published in English. It remains unbublished to this day. Of course. The secret behind Communism must remain a secret.
Solzhenitsyn's view on the Jews and Communism is actually far more nuanced than Duke's. As Wikipedia notes in its article on Two Hundred Years Together,
In the first volume, Solzhenitsyn discusses the history of Russians and the 100,000 Jews that had migrated to Russia between 1772 and the revolution of 1917. He asserts that the anti-Jewish pogroms in the Russian Empire were not government-sponsored but spontaneous acts of violence, except for some government culpability in the Pale of Settlement. Solzhenitsyn says that life for Russian Jews was hard but no harder than life for Russian peasants.[1] The second volume covers the post-revolution era up to 1970 when many Jews left Russia for Israel and other western countries.[8] Solzhenitsyn says that, despite the presence of Jewish Leon Trotsky, the 1917 February and October Revolutions were not the work of Judaism. Solzhenitsyn says that the Jews who participated in revolution were effectively apostates splitting from the spirit of tradition.[1] Solzhenitsyn emphatically denies that Jews were responsible for the revolutions of 1905 and 1917. At the end of chapter nine, Solzhenitsyn denounces "the superstitious faith in the historical potency of conspiracies" that leads some to blame the Russian revolutions on the Jews and to ignore the "Russian failings that determined our sad historical decline."[9]...

In the spirit of his classic 1974 essay "Repentance and Self-Limitation in the Life of Nations",[10] Solzhenitsyn calls for the Russians and Russian Jews alike to take responsibility for the "renegades" in both communities who supported a totalitarian and terrorist regime after 1917. At the end of chapter 15, he writes that Jews must answer for the "revolutionary cutthroats" in their ranks just as Russians must repent "for the pogroms, for...merciless arsonist peasants, for...crazed revolutionary soldiers." It is not, he adds, a matter of answering "before other peoples, but to oneself, to one's consciousness, and before God."[11]
Solzhenitsyn also takes the anti-Communist White movement to task for condoning violence against Jews and thus undermining "what would have been the chief benefit of a White victory" in the Russian Civil War: "a reasonable evolution of the Russian state."
Despite all of his caveats, Solzhenitsyn was still dragged through the mud in the West as an "anti-Semite" following the Russian publication of Two Hundred Years Together, and his book was blacklisted by Western publishers.

My own views probably fall somewhere between Solzhenitsyn's and Duke's. As a non-racist, and someone who is opposed to institutional racism (not least of all because institutional racism has ancient Jewish/Zionist origins), I have serious problems with race absolutism and the concept that people should be deprived of constitutional and national rights based upon what blood is or is not supposedly flowing through their veins (as they are in Israel).

On the other hand, I think it's nonsense that "the Jews who participated in revolution were effectively apostates splitting from the spirit of tradition," as there is no question whatsoever that Jewish doctrine and culture is chock full of racist and bigoted, anti-Gentile and anti-Christian dogma and rhetoric from the Old Testament/Hebrew bible through the Talmud through Jewish Zionist social and political culture, which unquestionably manifests in tenacious, vengeful racism, gangsterism and ethnic cleansing of the kind that Zionist Jews (both religious and "secular") regularly carry out in Israel against the Palestinians, and previously carried out on a vastly larger, apocalypse-sized scale in the early Soviet Union.

And yet again, I can also identify with Solzhenitsyn's warnings about scapegoating Jews entirely for what was a common, Jewish Zionist-Gentile joint venture in gangsterism, theft and mass murder in the Leninist-Trotskyist-Stalinist Russia, because a similar Jewish Zionist-Gentile alliance is behind the crimes and atrocities being perpetrated in the Levant, and in the greater Middle East, today.

In truth, The Secret Behind Communism never really was a secret. In fact, a young Winston Churchill explicitly warned the world about the "atheistic" Jews behind Bolshevism in an article in the Illustrated Sunday Herald in 1920.

But because Churchill was himself a racist of the Imperial variety, and because the imperatives of the British Empire were such that it was not convenient for the English to make a lot of waves about what factions of Jews and their partners were doing in Russia (and in fact, many wealthy Western interests from the Jewish and Anglo-American Wall Street bankers who financed the revolution to, for example, the fledgling Koch dynasty industrialists, were equally hell-bent on profiting from the enterprise) the Russian people in general and Russian Christians in particular were thrown to the Bolshevik/Zionist Moloch, never to be heard from again...almost.

Does all of this sound familiar, say, vis-a-vis the Israeli-Palestinian issue and American Empire?

Hence, those tempted to go the racialist or the "Jews are entirely the problem" route should keep this lesson in mind...that the money-worshipping, Imperialist/Globalist Judas Class is comprised of Zionist Jews and (principally White) Gentiles, the latter of whom are as equally treacherous and dangerous as are the Jewish Zionists themselves, in the same way that trusted Judas was ultimately as dangerous to Jesus as were the Pharisees to whom he was sold into death for a few pieces of silver.

Solzhenitsyn's insight, that the White Guard made a huge mistake when it advocated violence generically against Jews instead of limiting the target to political Jewish Bolsheviks doing the agitating and fighting is the wisdom of history speaking to us today. We must all work towards a reasonable evolution of the American state, not towards blind hatred based on real or imagined racial agendas or bloodlines.

Tribal-racial gangsterism begets tragedy and mass murder, as both Duke and the Jewish Zionists should know.

The problem isn't individual Jews but rather the Jewish Zionist quasi-fascists who made their way West, and have systematically worked to dominate organized Jewry for decades. And it isn't just the Jewish Zionists but rather the larger Judas Class that sustains and profits from the treacherous, money-worshipping, Zionist-Globalist Moloch as well.

 "The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves, that we are underlings"...to the Jewish Zionists, and to their Judas Class accomplices.

Thursday, June 13, 2013

In 1948, the year of Israel's founding, Einstein and Arendt issued a desperate appeal to the Jewish-American establishment: don't surrender to Zionist fascism

(By Chris Moore) -- In 1948, Albert Einstein and Hannah Arendt (perhaps most famous for her "banality of evil" thesis that the great evils in history have been perpetrated not by monsters but by ordinary people at the direction of a totalitarian state) were two of the twenty-eight prominent Jewish signatories of a letter sent to the New York Times presciently warning of a "Fascist" take over of Israel by those preaching "an admixture of ultranationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority" -- a take over that has since come to pass.

No doubt this group of dissident Jews feared not only the complete fascist take over of Israel, but the complete Zionist takeover of Judaism, as well, given that it was but six years earlier that a group of 757 Orthodox, Conservative and Reform rabbis of America issued a statement titled "Zionism An Affirmation of Judaism," declaring that "The overwhelming majority of American Rabbis regard Zionism not only as fully consistent with Judaism but as a logical expression and implementation of it," and proclaiming that Zionism "has its origins and roots in the authoritative religious texts of Judaism. Scripture and rabbinical literature alike are replete with the promise of the restoration of Israel to its ancestral home. Anti-Zionism, not Zionism, is a departure from the Jewish religion."

The immediate occasion for the Einstein letter was a pending fundraising and publicity visit by Menachem Begin to America on behalf of his political agenda and fledgling Freedom Party, a right-wing enterprise which eventually evolved into Likud, the current dominant political party in Israel that is now led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. (Begin had a background as leader of Irgun, a militant Zionist organization that sought the expulsion of the British mandatory government from Palestine by means of terrorism, which it ruthlessly carried out. Begin eventually became the sixth prime minister of Israel by way of Likud.)

The Einstein letter, which hoped to dissuade Americans and Jews from embracing the fascist interpretation of Judaism represented by Begin, made an important observation about Judeo-fascism that holds true to this day: its wolves in sheep's clothing modus operandi. Here's how the Einstein group describes the means by which fascist Jews insinuate their way into power using this dishonest method:
The public avowals of Begin's party are no guide whatever to its actual character. Today they speak of freedom, democracy and anti-imperialism, whereas until recently they openly preached the doctrine of the Fascist state. It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character; from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future...
The letter then outlines a "shocking example" of mass murder of Arab women and children carried out by Begin's terror squads, which was merely the tip of the iceberg of what was to come.

It's no coincidence that empty platitudes about freedom and democracy, and claims of anti-Islamofascism were some of the rationales used by the Israel lobby and Diaspora Zionist propaganda machine and the neocon Bush regime to legitimize the U.S. invasion of Iraq, when in fact the war was fought largely at the behest of Zionist geopolitical interests, just as was Begin's long-ago war of terror against the British mandatory government and the Palestinian natives.

The Einstein letter identified the predecessors to Likud as the "fascists" they were in 1948, yet no mainstream politician in Zionist-corrupted Washington would be caught dead declaring the contemporary Likud a fascist party today, even though it and Israel's racism, ethnic-cleansing abuses and warlike predations since '48 are exponentially worse.

In fact, to listen to contemporary Beltway establishment rhetoric, and to listen to Diaspora Zionist rhetoric, and to hear the "mainstream" neolibs and neocons and Democrats and Republicans talk, Israel is a sanctified holy nation and persecuted victim state no matter what it does, and regardless of whether fascists are running the place or not.

Yet, as Einstein's letter (viewed in retrospect) now attests, fascists have been running the place since the state of Israel's 1948 inception, and their militant racism and aggression has only gotten increasingly worse since.

These Beltway appeasers and partners of Judeo-fascism, just like their Israeli Zionist string-pullers, "speak of freedom, democracy and anti-imperialism"...but it's all window dressing and camouflage for their own politically correct brand of fascism and "liberal" totalitarianism.

Like those they model themselves after, they're simply wolves in sheep's clothing, and that includes the hypocritical and two-faced "liberal" Jewish Zionists that own and run the Democratic Party in the U.S. today, and their obsequious lackeys.

And yet, no doubt from the Zionist perspective, Judeo-fascism works, given that Jewry's election to adopt fascist operating methods and principles has resulted in Jews becoming the wealthiest socioeconomic group in the U.S. today, and given Israel's success in ethnically cleansing the Palestinians and creating ever more Jewish lebensraum in the Levant -- and all without any meaningful material repercussions, thanks to the Diaspora Zionist fifth column's ability to manipulate, strong arm and coerce endless diplomatic, monetary and military support from Uncle Sam.

But at what cost? Let's not forget the Einstein letter's past is prologue observation of the Judeo-fascist character that "from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future"...which means all of the Zionist-engineered trauma, wars and domestic police state policies of the last decade that America has experienced is merely scratching the surface of what's to come unless this deceitful, steadily-implemented totalitarian movement is summarily arrested in its footsteps.

And sooner or later, it will be arrested, either by way of America's economic collapse from the strain, or by way of the American people waking up to the serpentine Judeo-fascists in their midst, and to their legion of sick and cynical Gentile Zionist partisans.

Here is the text of letter from Einstein, Arendt et al, which might well be described as the last Jewish appeal of sanity and dissent from the Jewish establishment's wrong-headed course before it finally surrendered its soul completely and totally to the "ultranationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority" of Zionist fascism, aka Judeo-fascism:
New Palestine Party--Visit of Menachem Begin and Aims of Political Movement Discussed-- To the Editor of The New York Times--
Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the "Freedom Party" (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.

The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United States is obviously calculated to give the impression of American support for his party in the coming Israeli elections, and to cement political ties with conservative Zionist elements in the United States. Several Americans of national repute have lent their names to welcome his visit. It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughout the world, if correctly informed as to Mr. Begin's political record and perspectives, could add their names and support to the movement he represents.

Before irreparable damage is done by way of financial contributions, public manifestations in Begin's behalf, and the creation in Palestine of the impression that a large segment of America supports Fascist elements in Israel, the American public must be informed as to the record and objectives of Mr. Begin and his movement. The public avowals of Begin's party are no guide whatever to its actual character. Today they speak of freedom, democracy and anti-imperialism, whereas until recently they openly preached the doctrine of the Fascist state. It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character; from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future.

Attack on Arab Village 
A shocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin. This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had taken no part in the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who wanted to use the village as their base. On April 9 (THE NEW YORK TIMES), terrorist bands attacked this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in the fighting, killed most of its inhabitants--240 men, women, and children--and kept a few of them alive to parade as captives through the streets of Jerusalem. Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and the Jewish Agency sent a telegram of apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan. But the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of this massacre, publicized it widely, and invited all the foreign correspondents present in the country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc at Deir Yassin. The Deir Yassin incident exemplifies the character and actions of the Freedom Party.
Within the Jewish community they have preached an admixture of ultranationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority. Like other Fascist parties they have been used to break strikes, and have themselves pressed for the destruction of free trade unions. In their stead they have proposed corporate unions on the Italian Fascist model. During the last years of sporadic anti-British violence, the IZL and Stern groups inaugurated a reign of terror in the Palestine Jewish community. Teachers were beaten up for speaking against them, adults were shot for not letting their children join them. By gangster methods, beatings, window-smashing, and wide-spread robberies, the terrorists intimidated the population and exacted a heavy tribute.

The people of the Freedom Party have had no part in the constructive achievements in Palestine. They have reclaimed no land, built no settlements, and only detracted from the Jewish defense activity. Their much-publicized immigration endeavors were minute, and devoted mainly to bringing in Fascist compatriots.

Discrepancies Seen

The discrepancies between the bold claims now being made by Begin and his party, and their record of past performance in Palestine bear the imprint of no ordinary political party. This is the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party for whom terrorism (against Jews, Arabs, and British alike), and misrepresentation are means, and a "Leader State" is the goal.

In the light of the foregoing considerations, it is imperative that the truth about Mr. Begin and his movement be made known in this country. It is all the more tragic that the top leadership of American Zionism has refused to campaign against Begin's efforts, or even to expose to its own constituents the dangers to Israel from support to Begin.

The undersigned therefore take this means of publicly presenting a few salient facts concerning Begin and his party; and of urging all concerned not to support this latest manifestation of fascism. 
ISIDORE ABRAMOWITZ

HANNAH ARENDT

ABRAHAM BRICK

RABBI JESSURUN CARDOZO

ALBERT EINSTEIN

HERMAN EISEN, M.D.

HAYIM FINEMAN

M. GALLEN, M.D.

H.H. HARRIS

ZELIG S. HARRIS

SIDNEY HOOK

FRED KARUSH

BRURIA KAUFMAN

IRMA L. LINDHEIM

NACHMAN MAISEL

SEYMOUR MELMAN

MYER D. MENDELSON

M.D., HARRY M. OSLINSKY

SAMUEL PITLICK

FRITZ ROHRLICH

LOUIS P. ROCKER

RUTH SAGIS

ITZHAK SANKOWSKY

I.J. SHOENBERG

SAMUEL SHUMAN

M. SINGER

IRMA WOLFE

STEFAN WOLF.

New York, Dec. 2, 1948
Here is a copy of the original letter as it appeared in The New York Times.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Top officials from the president on down all but brag the Obama administration is dominated by the Jewish Zionist agenda

(By Chris Moore) -- In a remarkable sequence of speeches dating from Obama's March visit to Israel, top officials of the Obama administration from the president on down have all but openly declared that organized Jewry and the Zionist agenda dominates left-liberalism at the national level, and have made it clear that domination is being used to pursue the Zionist agenda both domestically and in the Middle East.

The first hint of the extent to which this administration will go to appease its wealthy Zionist backers came in a March trip by President Obama to Israel. Upon arrival, Obama immediately adopted the (false) Zionist narrative that today's Jews are bloodline descendants of biblical patriarch Abraham and his wife Sarah from the Old Testament, a narrative that has been used to legitimize Israel's ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from the Levant for decades. 

Proclaimed Obama upon touchdown in Israel:
More than 3,000 years ago, the Jewish people lived here, tended the land here, prayed to God here. And after centuries of exile and persecution, unparalleled in the history of man, the founding of the Jewish State of Israel was a rebirth, a redemption unlike any in history.
Today, the sons of Abraham and the daughters of Sarah are fulfilling the dream of the ages -- to be “masters of their own fate” in “their own sovereign state.” And just as we have for these past 65 years, the United States is proud to stand with you as your strongest ally and your greatest friend.
Yet contrary to Obama's claims, the latest DNA studies show that nearly all Ashkenazim Jews are descendants of medieval, Black and Caspian Sea-region Khazhar converts to Judaism, not descendants of the Eretz Yisrael Jews of the Bible. And given that some 80% of all Jews are Ashkenazim, this means the number of Jews who are "sons of Abraham and the daughters of Sarah" is minuscule, and at this point totally unidentifiable. 

By proclaiming the mythical Jewish bloodline rationale for Israel's land claims, Obama officially adopted a key plank of the Zionist platform that has been exploited to justify the Jewish state's rampaging ethnic cleansing, land theft, and expansive sense of land entitlement for years, and that has thrown a monkey wrench in Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations time and again.

As David Bromwich noted following Obama's speech:
Broadly speaking, Obama in Jerusalem revived his appeal for negotiation while paying the deepest respect to the blood-and-soil ideology of the right-wing Israeli government that makes negotiation impossible.
Adds M.J. Rosenberg:
But more than that it did significant damage to America’s ability to play the role of honest broker between Israelis and Palestinians if negotiations ever begin. Obama made clear which side he is on, going so far as to embrace the whole Biblical Jewish claim to Eretz Yisrael. How could Palestinians ever trust him? The umpire is not supposed to wear the uniform of either team.
Obama must know all this but he obviously thinks that Palestinians have no choice but to go along with anything he proposes. After all, they have nothing. He seems not to understand that because of that fact, they have, as the song goes, nothing left to lose. A Third Intifada or massive non-violent resistance could turn Israel upside down and Palestinians know it. Obama apparently doesn’t; he thinks, as Netanyahu clearly does, that the hungry are always grateful for crumbs.
Fast forward to a speech given by Vice President Joe Biden at a Jewish American Heritage Month reception hosted by the Democratic National Committee. Here, as reported by Jennifer Epstein for Politico, Biden said Jewish influence in the U.S. is "immense...immense."
“I believe what affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else,” he said. That’s why he spoke out on gay marriage “apparently a little ahead of time.”

“It wasn’t anything we legislatively did. It was ‘Will and Grace,’ it was the social media. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. That’s why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace and rapidly embrace” gay marriage, Biden said.

“Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good,” he said...

“So I think you, as usual, underestimate the impact of Jewish heritage. I really mean that. I think you vastly underestimate the impact you’ve had on the development of this nation. We owe you, we owe generations who came before you," he said.
As Philp Weiss pointed out in an analysis of the Biden speech:
And Biden has opened a door, even with his use of the prepositional phrase "behind all that." Behind is about quiet influence. And if we're so influential, doesn't that give people the right to discuss that influence-- say in the instance of the lobby, the Jewish marriage to Zionism and the effect of that collision on US policy in the Middle East? Of course.
Later that month, in a column that documented the huge Jewish social and monetary influence behind Obama, Weiss noted that Obama called three Jewish leaders his "cabal."
Well, last night at a fundraiser at the Chicago home of Bettylu Saltzman, a longtime Israel supporter, Obama used the word "cabal" to describe his early supporters-- and the three names he mentioned are all on the board of J Street. White House transcript:
I don't know if Bettylu actually told me that she thought I could be President. (Laughter.) But what I do know is this -- that when I had just gotten out of law school and was still finding my way, and I had come back here and I was assigned to work to register voters with Project Vote, Bettylu even then was at the forefront of a nonpartisan effort to get people registered and voting, back in 1992. And right away Bettylu treated me like a son, and with the warmth and concern, and she was somebody who introduced me to so many of the people in this room, and introduced me to so many people here in Chicago. And so when I look around the room and I see folks like Joan Harris and Judy Gaynor and people who have been supporters of mine from the get-go, I can all trace that back to Bettylu. We've got kind of a Obama cabal here in this room.
He seems to be referring to three members of the J Street Advisory Council: Joan Harris, chairwoman of the Irving B. Harris Foundation; Judy Gaynor, Founding co-chair, Human Rights Watch Chicago, and Saltzman. Saltzman has been a leading liberal Zionist. She is associated with Peace Now and is formerly an executive of the New Israel Fund. Her father, Philip Klutznick, was rich as all get out and a former Commerce Secretary.

The CBS News report on the Saltzman fundraiser says it was expensive:
But the big bucks awaited Obama and his party at the home of Bettylu Saltzman, whose support for Obama started decades earlier when he was first entering politics in Illinois. Tickets to dinner at Saltzman's home started at $10,000 and topped out at $32,400 — the legal maximum.

"I can honestly say I probably would not be president today without Bettylu Saltzman," Obama said. "Love that woman." 
There were many Jewish officials there, including Steve Israel, Jan Schakowsky, and Sandy Levin.

Many of Obama's early supporters were Jewish. Rashid Khalidi mentions Bettylu Saltzman as an Obama "mentor" in his book, Brokers of Deceit, and notes that Saltzman's father was a "leading figure in the American Jewish community," and a big supporter of Israel. Khalidi notes that as Obama went further into electoral politics, he took on financial backers Lester Crown, Alan Solow and Pritzker family members, all of whom "were major financial backers of Israel."

In "Barack Obama: The first Jewish president," The Chicago Tribune spoke of the importance of Jews to launching Obama:
Obama's circle of Jewish patrons and advisers widened further in 1992 when he became involved in a voter registration drive that brought him into contact with Bettylu Saltzman, a liberal activist (and daughter of the late Philip Klutznick, a former commerce secretary and shopping mall developer). Saltzman says she knew from the moment she met Obama that he would someday be president. She introduced him to David Axelrod, who saw something similar.

Axelrod designed the strategy in which Obama first won the backing of white liberals and then reached out to blacks. Jews made up a significant number of the first constituency.

"As Jews got to know him, they recognized a kindred spirit, not someone who came down from Mars," Mikva said.

'Rabbi Arnold Wolf, of KAM Isaiah Israel synagogue across the street from Obama's Chicago home, was another early backer. Like Mikva, he sees what he called Obama's "Jewish side."
All of this comports with previous research into outsized Zionist influence behind the Obama presidency done by Jeff Gates, who also points out that key neocon figures in the G.W. Bush administration like Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith who were behind the Iraq war (which evidence suggests was fought largely for Israeli interests) form a crucial component of what has charitably been labeled the "Israel lobby," but which in truth operates more like an Israel-first fifth column:
Be not deceived by Barack Hussein Obama’s middle name or by the fact that he spent several childhood years in Indonesia. His political career is a product of a Westside Chicago Ashkenazi network with roots that trace directly back to organized crime of the 1920s.

Top fundraiser Penny Pritzker traces her family lineage to grandfather Abe and great-grandfather Nicholas who served as lawyers for organized crime. She declined a nomination as Secretary of Commerce in the Obama Cabinet, a post typically offered top fundraisers. Her confirmation hearings could have proved a political embarrassment by reminding us of the suspect origins of “our” latest president.

Clinton White House counsel Abner Mikva aptly described this high-profile product of the Chicago Outfit as “the first Jewish president.” Plus his Vice President, only a heartbeat from the reins of power, is the reliably obsequious Joe “I am a Zionist” Biden.

For his Secretary of State, Obama appointed a presidential rival, Hillary Clinton, whose political career traces to the same source. After serving as First Lady in the presidency of Arkansas native Bill Clinton, she fled to New York to run for the U.S. Senate knowing she could not win an election—any election—in Arkansas where she is widely reviled.

By staking out extreme pro-Israeli positions, she joined New York Senator Charles Schumer as, in practical effect, the second Jewish Senator from a key electoral state long dominated by this trans-generational criminal syndicate.

The chiefs of staff for Barack and Michele Obama are both Ashkenazim from Chicago, long a center of foreign espionage. That fact was recently reconfirmed by Federal Bureau of Investigation translator Sibel Edmonds when, from FBI wiretaps, she documented the close working relationship between the Israel Lobby and U.S. officials with power over policy making in the Middle East, including Richard Perle, Wolfowitz understudy Douglas Feith and key members of Congress.
So clearly, while this wealthy, Israel-first fifth column operates principally out of the cesspool of corruption and increasing police-state "Progressivism" that is American left-liberalism at the national level, it straddles the neocon right as well...all of which raises a crucial question: Who is representing the interests of the American people, particularly when those interests come into conflict with Diaspora Zionism and the multitude of poisonous and warlike items on both its domestic and foreign policy agenda?

Wednesday, June 05, 2013

Columbia U. professor says racist Whites have always been supporters of Israel, from the Nazis through the pro-Zionists of today


(By Chris Moore) -- Columbia Professor of Arab Politics Joseph Massad got into hot water with critics and colleagues recently when he made the claim in a controversial essay for Al Jazeera that a lot of the Jews who died in the Holocaust opposed Zionism and were thrown to the wolves for doing so, and that Zionists colluded with like-minded Nazis to spur Israel's creation.

Massad wrote:
Despite the overwhelming opposition of most German Jews, it was the Zionist Federation of Germany that was the only Jewish group that supported the Nuremberg Laws of 1935, as they agreed with the Nazis that Jews and Aryans were separate and separable races. This was not a tactical support but one based on ideological similitude. The Nazis' Final Solution initially meant the expulsion of Germany's Jews to Madagascar. It is this shared goal of expelling Jews from Europe as a separate unassimilable race that created the affinity between Nazis and Zionists all along.

While the majority of Jews continued to resist the anti-Semitic basis of Zionism and its alliances with anti-Semites, the Nazi genocide not only killed 90 percent of European Jews, but in the process also killed the majority of Jewish enemies of Zionism who died precisely because they refused to heed the Zionist call of abandoning their countries and homes.
Massad says a fascist-like collusion between the West and Israel continues to this day.
After the War, the horror at the Jewish holocaust did not stop European countries from supporting the anti-Semitic programme of Zionism. On the contrary, these countries shared with the Nazis a predilection for Zionism...

It was thus that the European and US commitment to white supremacy was preserved, except that it now included Jews as part of "white" people, and what came to be called "Judeo-Christian" civilisation. European and American policies after World War II, which continued to be inspired and dictated by racism against Native Americans, Africans, Asians, Arabs and Muslims, and continued to support Zionism's anti-Semitic programme of assimilating Jews into whiteness in a colonial settler state away from Europe, were a direct continuation of anti-Semitic policies prevalent before the War. It was just that much of the anti-Semitic racialist venom would now be directed at Arabs and Muslims (both, those who are immigrants and citizens in Europe and the United States and those who live in Asia and Africa) while the erstwhile anti-Semitic support for Zionism would continue unhindered.
In Massad's version of the background of 20th Century history, the narrative that emerges is one wherein Nazi-partisan White and Christian anti-Semites wanted the Jews expelled from Western Civilization for racial reasons, whereas other White Christians (the ones who would eventually win World War II against the Nazis) simply wanted to partner with Zionist Jews in utilizing Israel as a "colonial settler state" away from Europe that would, among other thing, be useful for "assimilating Jews into whiteness." These Whites additionally valued Reform Judaism "as a Christian- and Protestant-like variant of Judaism."

The Western establishment that emerged victorious in World War II thus rolled the Jews into a neo-racist, Judeo-Christian Europeaness that celebrated the (mostly Zionist) remaining Jews as sanctified victims who had earned their place at the White table of privilege, while continuing to ignore or bury the history of fascist-like extermination, enslavement and subjugation of Native Americans, African Americans and other non-Whites perpetrated mostly by White Anglo Saxon Protestants.
After World War II, a new consensus emerged in the United States and Europe that Jews had to be integrated posthumously into white Europeanness, and that the horror of the Jewish holocaust was essentially a horror at the murder of white Europeans. Since the 1960s, Hollywood films about the holocaust began to depict Jewish victims of Nazism as white Christian-looking, middle class, educated and talented people not unlike contemporary European and American Christians who should and would identify with them. Presumably if the films were to depict the poor religious Jews of Eastern Europe (and most East European Jews who were killed by the Nazis were poor and many were religious), contemporary white Christians would not find commonality with them. Hence, the post-holocaust European Christian horror at the genocide of European Jews was not based on the horror of slaughtering people in the millions who were different from European Christians, but rather a horror at the murder of millions of people who were the same as European Christians. This explains why in a country like the United States, which had nothing to do with the slaughter of European Jews, there exists upwards of 40 holocaust memorials and a major museum for the murdered Jews of Europe, but not one for the holocaust of Native Americans or African Americans for which the US is responsible.
Massad does not recognize the messianic Zionism and Torah racism inherent in ancient through contemporary Jewish religious doctrine and dogma, nor does he acknowledge that anti-Christian Jewish Bolshevism, in partnership with Leninism and Stalinism, butchered millions of Orthodox Christians in the Soviet Union prior to the rise of Nazism (which facilitated fascism's ascension) and yet, there are no U.S. memorials to these murdered Whites and Christians either -- even though their numbers dwarf the number of Jews killed in the Holocaust by millions. 

Massad characterizes the atrocities perpetrated by the Soviet Union as mere allegations, and nowhere acknowledges that many of the early Israeli settlers were Labor Zionists and former Soviet Communist Jews who simply transitioned their left-wing and tribal-racist, anti-Christian Judeo-supremacist mentality and agenda from the Soviet sphere and Europe to a tribal-racist, anti-Christian and anti-Islamic Judeo-supremacist mentality and agenda in Palestine.

Massad continues:
The rehabilitation of European Jews after WWII was a crucial part of US Cold War propaganda. As American social scientists and ideologues developed the theory of "totalitarianism", which posited Soviet Communism and Nazism as essentially the same type of regime, European Jews, as victims of one totalitarian regime, became part of the atrocity exhibition that American and West European propaganda claimed was like the atrocities that the Soviet regime was allegedly committing in the pre- and post-War periods. That Israel would jump on the bandwagon by accusing the Soviets of anti-Semitism for their refusal to allow Soviet Jewish citizens to self-expel and leave to Israel was part of the propaganda.
While it's true that Zionists exploited the growth of anti-Semitism in the Soviet Union after Stalin had his falling out with Jewish Bolshevik hero and role model Leon Trotsky, and Stalin came to recognize Jewish Bolshevism as the Zionist Trojan horse ideology it always was, Massad ignores the fact that it was the Trotskyite Jews who had reinvented themselves as neocons, not Cold War Christians, who principally engineered the narrative that Jews were victims of both Communist and Nazi anti-Semitism and the inference that they had no agency whatsoever in their own plight. (Indeed, the Trotskyite neocon Jews, right along with the other Diaspora Zionist Jews who merely transitioned from Communists into cultural Marxists, social democrats, and left-liberals, conveniently flushed Jewry's integral role in the imposition of Communist totalitarianism and mass murder straight down the memory hole.)

In totality, what Massad apparently seeks to accomplish with this essay is the scapegoating of Whites and Christians (instead of organized Jewry) as the principal force behind Zionism (for left-wing purposes)  and validation of the Islamic stream of thought that Zionist Judaism is more in line with Western Christianity than it is with Middle Eastern Islam. This is done through the suggestion that most Jews are ideologically more akin to Protestant "Judeo-Christians" than they are to Muslims, and that the Jews of Israel have no valid ethnic, ideological, intellectual or theological claims to any portion of the Levant whatsoever.


In short, Massad is arguing is that the Ashkenazi Zionist Jews belong in Europe and Western Civilization and not in Israel, nor the Levant, nor Islamic Civilization, nor perhaps anywhere on the Asian continent, because they don't have any legitimate claim, religious or otherwise, to the lands occupied by Israel.

And certainly, if one is inclined to think in racial terms and demand that ethnicities should break racially upon civilization fault lines, Massad has a point, given that the latest DNA research shows that the vast majority of today's Jews are descendants of the Khazars (a medieval empire located mainly on the northern side of the Black and Caspian Seas--in areas of what is now Ukraine, South Russia and Kazakhstan--some of which converted to Judaism). Thus descendants of these peoples, who became the Ashkenazim (European) Jews, have little to no DNA connection to the ancient Israelites or even the Levant, contra Zionists claims. (Kazhar-descended Ashkenazi Jews apparently comprise approximately 80% of world Jewry today, which means very few Jews do have any bloodline claim to the Levant.)


But aren't left-wing thinkers ostensibly opponents of the powers-that-be moving peoples around the globe like chess pieces based upon race? Presumably, they would object to Islamist Arabs being removed from Europe because they lack European bloodlines, so what difference does it make that most Jews lack Middle Eastern bloodlines?

However, Massad has a legitimate point that there is a certain theological and spiritual commonality between some strains of Protestantism and Judaism (Judeo-Christian Zionist and Judeophile liberal strains, for example) particularly in terms of haughty materialism, a veneration of money, and a fixation on class, position and prestige.

But how much of this is a truly spiritual esprit de corps and how much of it is simply a money-motivated marriage of convenience in the same way that the grasping British Empire entered into a marriage of convenience with the Zionist Rothschilds with the Balfour Declaration (which became the basis of Israel) is anybodies guess.

Additionally, the concept of "Judeo-Christianity" is almost entirely a made-in-America myth, because in reality there is no love lost whatsoever between the traditional Christians of Western Civilization, who viewed Christianity as completely and totally irreconcilable with the Jewish mentality, and organized Judaism. Indeed, the entirety of Western Civilization from the Greeks through the Romans through Christendom through the Enlightenment thinkers to today's pro-Christian and pro-Western anti-Zionists has been butting heads with the Jews for millennia. 

So ultimately, to the extent that it is Massad's intention to create an intellectual framework that validates the claim that Zionist Jewry naturally belongs more in the West than it does in the Middle East, even upon the humanitarian grounds of limiting wars and endless conflict, his arguments come up short -- particular given the fact that it is Diaspora Zionists who are the principal enablers of Israel's military, diplomatic and monetary blank check from the West, and who are viewed by many as the "decisive" force behind Western wars for Israel.

And given the extent to which both Zionists and Islamists conflate politics, religion, ethnicity, culture, ideology, and identity into one authoritarian, Abraham-venerating stew of seething tribalism, it seems Zionist Jewry, which never did accept the distinction between religion and state and has always set up vengeance-driven, Zionist-serving tribal factions within whatever Western governments it has managed to penetrate, is probably right where it belongs.

The problem isn't as much the racist Zionists in Israel as it is the racist Zionists whose tribal intrigue and machinations are still tolerated in the Diaspora, and who are enabling the racist Zionists in Israel to get away with murder by way of, among many other institutions, the Israel lobby (comprised most prominently of powerful Diaspora Zionists of the Jewish oligarchy, Jews now being the wealthiest group in the U.S.).

And not only are these Diaspora Zionists a mortal threat to Gentiles, but as Massad notes vis-a-vis their alliances with racist extremists such as factions of pro-Zionist neo-fascists and certain "Judeo-Christians," they're a mortal threat to the non-ideological, non-Zionist and anti-Zionist Jews as well. 

Additionally, let's not forget that Diaspora Zionist Jewry's main base of operations in the West has long been on the left, which means their game is one of triangulation, which defines Zionism as kosher from mainstream left to mainstream right, and any anti-Zionists forces outside of that "center" are characterized as "extremists." 

So really, wherever there is a religion, political orientation, party, ideology, or corporation of any kind that becomes weak, unprincipled or corrupt enough to be seduced into backing Zionism (e.g. the contemporary Beltway) it's always a safe bet that ear-whispering Diaspora Zionists will eventually be found at the elbow of it greediest, most unprincipled, and most corruptible members. 

And this makes the Diaspora Zionists and their accomplices (left to right, and of any race or creed) --  not the Israeli Zionists -- the central protagonists of the Zionist problem.