The Hidden History of World War II — And the System It Created, by Mark Keenan - The Unz Review
OpenAI Text Summary
The article "Who Really Won the Twentieth Century?" challenges the traditional narrative of the twentieth century as a straightforward victory for democracy over fascism and communism. While the standard story recounts the defeat of fascism, the collapse of communism, and the establishment of the United Nations, the author argues that this oversimplifies a complex reality. Instead of focusing solely on ideological battles or military victories, the article emphasizes the pivotal role of financial power in shaping the postwar world. It posits that World War II reorganized global systems, leaving nations like America militarized and indebted while enabling new financial structures to dominate international relations.
The author explores the idea that the real victors in the twentieth century were not individual states or ideologies but the systems of international finance and elite networks that transcended national borders. Citing revisionist historians, the article suggests that both capitalism and communism functioned as tools of centralized power rather than opposing forces. This perspective raises critical questions about the nature of the ideological conflicts of the century, suggesting that such struggles were often influenced by underlying economic systems that benefitted a select few while disenfranchising the masses. The text argues that these financial systems have continued to shape conflicts and policies, often at the expense of individual sovereignty and autonomy.
The discussion further delves into the connections between the Bolshevik Revolution and Western financial interests, suggesting that the rise of communism was not solely a grassroots movement but rather supported by elite networks that saw centralized control as advantageous for their economic agendas. It challenges the notion that communism posed a genuine threat to monopoly capitalism, proposing that both systems ultimately led to the concentration of power, albeit through different mechanisms. The article posits that the ideological battles of the past century obscured the more significant role of financial elites in shaping political outcomes, including the rise of totalitarian regimes and the management of postwar societies.
In examining the postwar period, the author highlights the suffering and dispossession experienced by various populations, particularly in Eastern Europe, and critiques the role of institutions like the United Nations as a means of managing global governance rather than promoting true sovereignty. By framing the twentieth century as a time when older forms of sovereignty were dismantled in favor of centralized management systems, the article calls for a reevaluation of historical narratives. Ultimately, it asserts that those who truly "won" were not the common people affected by war but rather the institutions and financial interests that emerged stronger and more influential in the new world order...FULL ARTICLE...
Saturday, May 09, 2026
Friday, May 08, 2026
Monday, May 04, 2026
Iran war, Made in Israel: The fast talking Jewz sold willing dupe and professional conman Trump another fabulist story of an easily accomplished, Chosen Ones/ZOG conquest of Iran. America and the world are now paying the price
How ‘Israel’s’ Iran regime change plot failed – again « Aletho News
An investigative report by Israeli outlet Ynet has laid bare the embarrassing cataclysm not only of the US-Israeli war on Iran, but the Zionist entity’s effort throughout to end the Islamic Republic via covert and overt military and intelligence operations. Violent Mossad-orchestrated protests, the murder of Leader Sayyed Ali Khamenei, and a Kurdish invasion were intended to produce regime change and “total victory” over Tehran. Yet, as Ynet concludes: “what started as a far-reaching Israeli move, rich in imagination, final in its solution, ends in heartache.”
In granular detail, the investigation tracks how the Zionist entity’s deranged scheme germinated in the minds of Israeli intelligence, military, and political chiefs, before the Trump administration was comprehensively sold on the plot. Along the way, Ynet exposes extraordinary and dangerous levels of delusion and imperial hubris at the highest levels of Tel Aviv and Washington. For example, Benjamin Netanyahu sincerely – and entirely falsely – believed “Israel’s” criminal September 2024 assault of Lebanon, and the June 2025 12-Day War, had decimated Hezbollah and Iran.
This perspective was shared by Mossad, which had been building a vast, dedicated anti-government army in Tehran since 2022. The Zionist entity was delusionally convinced it had the power to collapse the entire Islamic Republic. “Fostering mass protest” and encouraging “armed resistance of minorities” – specifically, Kurds within and without Iran – in “parallel” with assassinating Leader Sayyed Ali Khamenei was part of a three-pronged coup d’etat strategy. Netanyahu believed “total victory” over the Resistance was in grasp in every theatre. Ynet reports:
“Overthrowing the regime was the heart of Israel’s overall war plan.”
The operation was intended to be put into action this June. Yet, in January, with “tens of thousands” of Mossad-directed insurrectionists in the streets of Tehran and other Iranian cities, the Zionist entity believed conditions had sufficiently “ripened” to make a decisive move. Mossad’s “influence organization” was birthed in 2022, reaching “operational maturity two and a half years ago.” Ynet bleakly boasts of the “effort and sophistication” of the Zionist entity’s armed clandestine army of anti-government rioters in Tehran:
“Israel has established its own poison machine. This is a serious weapon system that, if fully operational, can be fatal.”
Mossad pitched its braindead regime change plan directly to the CIA, Pentagon Central Command was informed of it by visiting Zionist Occupation Forces chief of staff Eyal Zamir, while Trump got personally lobbied by Netanyahu. The President – “convinced there were no limits to the capabilities of the military system at his command” after Nicolas Maduro’s January 3rd kidnap – and his administration were a highly receptive audience. Trump indicated his endorsement of the conspiracy on January 13th, publicly informing Iranians “help is on its way.”
A vast US military buildup in West Asia immediately began, while supposed peace talks with Tehran were ongoing. The negotiations were of course a con, intended to lull the Resistance into a false sense of security before the next phase of “Israel’s” intended palace coup commenced. On February 28th, Zionist-American airstrikes rained down on Tehran. “Israel” and the US firmly believed Iran’s leadership had been eliminated or scattered, and the Islamic Republic’s command and control system was “severely beaten.” But then, catastrophe started to erupt...MORE...
How ‘Israel’s’ Iran regime change plot failed – again « Aletho News
An investigative report by Israeli outlet Ynet has laid bare the embarrassing cataclysm not only of the US-Israeli war on Iran, but the Zionist entity’s effort throughout to end the Islamic Republic via covert and overt military and intelligence operations. Violent Mossad-orchestrated protests, the murder of Leader Sayyed Ali Khamenei, and a Kurdish invasion were intended to produce regime change and “total victory” over Tehran. Yet, as Ynet concludes: “what started as a far-reaching Israeli move, rich in imagination, final in its solution, ends in heartache.”
In granular detail, the investigation tracks how the Zionist entity’s deranged scheme germinated in the minds of Israeli intelligence, military, and political chiefs, before the Trump administration was comprehensively sold on the plot. Along the way, Ynet exposes extraordinary and dangerous levels of delusion and imperial hubris at the highest levels of Tel Aviv and Washington. For example, Benjamin Netanyahu sincerely – and entirely falsely – believed “Israel’s” criminal September 2024 assault of Lebanon, and the June 2025 12-Day War, had decimated Hezbollah and Iran.
This perspective was shared by Mossad, which had been building a vast, dedicated anti-government army in Tehran since 2022. The Zionist entity was delusionally convinced it had the power to collapse the entire Islamic Republic. “Fostering mass protest” and encouraging “armed resistance of minorities” – specifically, Kurds within and without Iran – in “parallel” with assassinating Leader Sayyed Ali Khamenei was part of a three-pronged coup d’etat strategy. Netanyahu believed “total victory” over the Resistance was in grasp in every theatre. Ynet reports:
“Overthrowing the regime was the heart of Israel’s overall war plan.”
The operation was intended to be put into action this June. Yet, in January, with “tens of thousands” of Mossad-directed insurrectionists in the streets of Tehran and other Iranian cities, the Zionist entity believed conditions had sufficiently “ripened” to make a decisive move. Mossad’s “influence organization” was birthed in 2022, reaching “operational maturity two and a half years ago.” Ynet bleakly boasts of the “effort and sophistication” of the Zionist entity’s armed clandestine army of anti-government rioters in Tehran:
“Israel has established its own poison machine. This is a serious weapon system that, if fully operational, can be fatal.”
Mossad pitched its braindead regime change plan directly to the CIA, Pentagon Central Command was informed of it by visiting Zionist Occupation Forces chief of staff Eyal Zamir, while Trump got personally lobbied by Netanyahu. The President – “convinced there were no limits to the capabilities of the military system at his command” after Nicolas Maduro’s January 3rd kidnap – and his administration were a highly receptive audience. Trump indicated his endorsement of the conspiracy on January 13th, publicly informing Iranians “help is on its way.”
A vast US military buildup in West Asia immediately began, while supposed peace talks with Tehran were ongoing. The negotiations were of course a con, intended to lull the Resistance into a false sense of security before the next phase of “Israel’s” intended palace coup commenced. On February 28th, Zionist-American airstrikes rained down on Tehran. “Israel” and the US firmly believed Iran’s leadership had been eliminated or scattered, and the Islamic Republic’s command and control system was “severely beaten.” But then, catastrophe started to erupt...MORE...
How ‘Israel’s’ Iran regime change plot failed – again « Aletho News
Jews increasingly and violently lash out at Christians as Judeofascist state comes under scrutiny
Israel’s top Jewish religious body 'refuses to condemn' smashing of Jesus statue | Middle East Eye
Israel’s Chief Rabbinate has declined to condemn the smashing of a statue of Jesus by a soldier in southern Lebanon earlier this month, according to Army Radio.
The report on Thursday said military officials had asked the Rabbinate, the highest Jewish religious authority in Israel, to issue a statement condemning the incident, which drew widespread criticism.
According to the report, the army requested that the Rabbinate denounce the act as contrary to Jewish law, but no such condemnation was issued.
Instead, the Rabbinate reportedly agreed to coordinate with the military and Israel’s propaganda apparatus, known as hasbara, in handling similar incidents in the future.
The Israeli military did not deny the report.
"Given the sensitivity surrounding the harm to a religious symbol, the IDF (Israeli army) considered various options for conveying that this incident does not reflect its values,” the military said.
"Naturally, some of these measures were implemented while others were not," it added.
The incident, which took place in the southern Lebanese village of Debel, sparked international outrage, with religious and political leaders condemning the act.
The Israeli army said it dismissed the soldier who smashed the statue, as well as another who filmed the incident, and sentenced both to 30 days in military prison.
Religious influence in the military
The incident comes amid growing debate within Israel over the increasing influence of religion in the military.
"Secular soldiers came to understand that they have no choice but to live with what enables religious soldiers to serve alongside them," Haaretz columnist Yossi Klein wrote on Wednesday.
“The military is prepared for the lives of secular soldiers to become unbearable in the shared military space,” he added, arguing that “the fusion of militarism and religiosity creates causes to fight for when there are no real objectives”.
"Those who reject this fusion are perceived not only as a heretic, but also as a traitor to the state," Klein added.
Earlier this month, Israel’s High Court ruled that the army must offer female soldiers the option of serving in the Armoured Corps, prompting criticism from some religious leaders.
Ynet reported on Tuesday that heads of yeshivas - traditional Jewish educational institutions - that are affiliated with the settler movement and the military held an emergency meeting to denounce the ruling.
One rabbi said: “I am not against women’s service, but we will not serve where there is gender mixing.”
Among prominent religious figures in the military is Rabbi Avraham Zarbiv, who became a mascot for bulldozing and destroying Palestinian homes during the Gaza genocide.
During Israel's Independence Day ceremony last week, Zarbiv lit a torch as Israeli officials praised his actions.
Before the ceremony, Netanel Shemka, the commander of the Givati Brigade, which is currently destroying homes in southern Lebanon, said that Zarbiv "is speaking in the name of the Givati Brigade"...LINK
Israel’s top Jewish religious body 'refuses to condemn' smashing of Jesus statue | Middle East Eye
Israel’s Chief Rabbinate has declined to condemn the smashing of a statue of Jesus by a soldier in southern Lebanon earlier this month, according to Army Radio.
The report on Thursday said military officials had asked the Rabbinate, the highest Jewish religious authority in Israel, to issue a statement condemning the incident, which drew widespread criticism.
According to the report, the army requested that the Rabbinate denounce the act as contrary to Jewish law, but no such condemnation was issued.
Instead, the Rabbinate reportedly agreed to coordinate with the military and Israel’s propaganda apparatus, known as hasbara, in handling similar incidents in the future.
The Israeli military did not deny the report.
"Given the sensitivity surrounding the harm to a religious symbol, the IDF (Israeli army) considered various options for conveying that this incident does not reflect its values,” the military said.
"Naturally, some of these measures were implemented while others were not," it added.
The incident, which took place in the southern Lebanese village of Debel, sparked international outrage, with religious and political leaders condemning the act.
The Israeli army said it dismissed the soldier who smashed the statue, as well as another who filmed the incident, and sentenced both to 30 days in military prison.
Religious influence in the military
The incident comes amid growing debate within Israel over the increasing influence of religion in the military.
"Secular soldiers came to understand that they have no choice but to live with what enables religious soldiers to serve alongside them," Haaretz columnist Yossi Klein wrote on Wednesday.
“The military is prepared for the lives of secular soldiers to become unbearable in the shared military space,” he added, arguing that “the fusion of militarism and religiosity creates causes to fight for when there are no real objectives”.
"Those who reject this fusion are perceived not only as a heretic, but also as a traitor to the state," Klein added.
Earlier this month, Israel’s High Court ruled that the army must offer female soldiers the option of serving in the Armoured Corps, prompting criticism from some religious leaders.
Ynet reported on Tuesday that heads of yeshivas - traditional Jewish educational institutions - that are affiliated with the settler movement and the military held an emergency meeting to denounce the ruling.
One rabbi said: “I am not against women’s service, but we will not serve where there is gender mixing.”
Among prominent religious figures in the military is Rabbi Avraham Zarbiv, who became a mascot for bulldozing and destroying Palestinian homes during the Gaza genocide.
During Israel's Independence Day ceremony last week, Zarbiv lit a torch as Israeli officials praised his actions.
Before the ceremony, Netanel Shemka, the commander of the Givati Brigade, which is currently destroying homes in southern Lebanon, said that Zarbiv "is speaking in the name of the Givati Brigade"...LINK
Israel’s top Jewish religious body 'refuses to condemn' smashing of Jesus statue | Middle East Eye
Saturday, May 02, 2026
Xi and Putin are working together to counter Jewish and Anglo-Zionist hegemony, prevent the murderous Zionist plan to nuke Iran
Netanyahu's Plan to Nuke Iran - In One Diagram Censored by X, by Marco de Wit - The Unz Review
OpenAI Text Summary
The article discusses the intersection of geopolitics, economics, and the influence of a specific demographic, particularly focusing on Jewish communities and their perceived role as a "Dominant Minority" in Western countries. It suggests that average national IQ and ethnocentrism shape the geopolitical landscape, with Jews historically scoring high on both metrics, which the author argues has led to significant influence over Western history. The text posits that this influence has manifested in various socio-political strategies, particularly during periods of conflict, where Jewish communities have been portrayed as aggressive in their pursuits, leveraging their status to foster division within nations and manipulate international relations.
A central theme in the article is the "Double Balkanization" strategy employed to undermine both Western nations and Middle Eastern states. The author claims that Jewish elites have historically utilized tactics to decrease social cohesion in high-IQ Western countries while simultaneously destabilizing lower-IQ nations, particularly in the Middle East. This strategy is described as a method of creating internal conflict, which allows for greater control and influence over these societies. The article argues that the ongoing geopolitical tensions, especially involving Iran, are framed as a continuation of this strategy, with the Jewish elite allegedly pushing for economic warfare and military action to achieve their ends.
The author then examines the geopolitical dynamics between Israel, the United States, Russia, and China, suggesting that the latter two countries have served as significant obstacles to the purported ambitions of Jewish elites. The text argues that the rise of leaders like Putin and Xi has rekindled a strategic alliance that poses a challenge to Western dominance. This section underscores a historical narrative of conflict and resistance, depicting Russia and China as nations that have confronted Jewish influence and American hegemony over the last century, particularly through events like the Opium Wars and the Cold War.
Finally, the article posits that a potential nuclear conflict could arise from these geopolitical tensions, particularly concerning Iran. The author speculates on a scenario where the U.S. and Israel might resort to nuclear options as a means of controlling regional dynamics, emphasizing the risks involved for global stability. The narrative suggests that the ruling elite may view such drastic actions as necessary to maintain their power and influence, despite the potential consequences of a nuclear strike. The text concludes by highlighting the precarious balance of power, urging readers to consider the strategic calculations behind international relations, especially concerning the Jewish elite's role in shaping these dynamics...LINK TO ORIGINAL ARTICLE...
A central theme in the article is the "Double Balkanization" strategy employed to undermine both Western nations and Middle Eastern states. The author claims that Jewish elites have historically utilized tactics to decrease social cohesion in high-IQ Western countries while simultaneously destabilizing lower-IQ nations, particularly in the Middle East. This strategy is described as a method of creating internal conflict, which allows for greater control and influence over these societies. The article argues that the ongoing geopolitical tensions, especially involving Iran, are framed as a continuation of this strategy, with the Jewish elite allegedly pushing for economic warfare and military action to achieve their ends.
The author then examines the geopolitical dynamics between Israel, the United States, Russia, and China, suggesting that the latter two countries have served as significant obstacles to the purported ambitions of Jewish elites. The text argues that the rise of leaders like Putin and Xi has rekindled a strategic alliance that poses a challenge to Western dominance. This section underscores a historical narrative of conflict and resistance, depicting Russia and China as nations that have confronted Jewish influence and American hegemony over the last century, particularly through events like the Opium Wars and the Cold War.
Finally, the article posits that a potential nuclear conflict could arise from these geopolitical tensions, particularly concerning Iran. The author speculates on a scenario where the U.S. and Israel might resort to nuclear options as a means of controlling regional dynamics, emphasizing the risks involved for global stability. The narrative suggests that the ruling elite may view such drastic actions as necessary to maintain their power and influence, despite the potential consequences of a nuclear strike. The text concludes by highlighting the precarious balance of power, urging readers to consider the strategic calculations behind international relations, especially concerning the Jewish elite's role in shaping these dynamics...LINK TO ORIGINAL ARTICLE...
Wednesday, April 29, 2026
Trump and his openly homosexual Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, a (((George Soros))) lackey, are using undocumented aliens as an excuse to force American citizens into total digital surveillance
The Burning Platform explains:
“In a move that exposes the true agenda behind the “America First” rhetoric, the Trump administration is barreling forward with an executive order that will force every American to hand over their biometric facial data or be locked out of the banking system entirely. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, a longtime Soros protégé who helped wreck the British economy in the 1992 Black Wednesday raid [by Soros on the British currency], has confirmed the policy is “in process.” Banks will be required to verify every customer’s citizenship using a U.S. passport containing embedded RFID chips and government-ready facial recognition biometrics. No passport? No bank account. Period. Real ID, driver’s licenses, and every other common document will not suffice. This is not border security. This is the final knot in the digital noose.
“The order’s language is chillingly straightforward: banks must fully “know your customer,” including immigration status. Undocumented immigrants “don’t have a right to be in the banking system,” Bessent declared. But the real target is every American citizen. Millions without passports will now be compelled to get one with high-resolution facial scans formatted for seamless integration into centralized government databases. Once your face is digitized and permanently linked to your money, the infrastructure for a cashless surveillance state is complete. Track, freeze, or deny funds at will based on compliance, social scores, political dissent, or future “misinformation” flags. This is how they build the cage: one “security” measure at a time.” https://www.theburningplatform.com/2026/04/25/trump-administration-fast-tracks-the-digital-control-grid/
Notice that Trump’s unconstitutional executive order pretends the order is against “undocumented immigrants” who Bessent says “don’t have a right to be in the banking system.” What a blatant lie! Undocumented immigrants have the right to work and they are paid via checks drawn on bank accounts. The federal government issues them ID cards and states issue them driving licenses. They receive housing, medical, food, and educational benefits. In some Democrat states and cities they vote in US elections and serve in state and local governments. California passed a law, or tried to, to allow immigrant-invaders to serve as police officers. Immigrant-invaders have been extended the Constitutional rights that the US Constitution gives to US citizens. So what does Bessent mean that undocumented aliens cannot have a bank account?
Is this the best disguise the Trump regime can give to tyranny?
The infrastructure of tyranny “is being built right now, under the cover of “securing the border” and “know your customer.”
Trump is adding to the construction of tyranny by urging Congress to approve a FISA domestic spying program. Trump says he is willing to give up his Constitutionally protected civil liberties for national security and the military’s needs.
Be sure you understand what is occurring. The federal government let in millions of undocumented immigrant-invaders including criminals and possibly terrorists. To protect against this threat, the federal government wants to take away the Constitutionally protected civil liberties of US citizens. Trump’s plan leaves Americans completely unprotected against government just as the American colonists were unprotected against the British government except by force of arms.
Congress will vote for “national security” and “for the military.” Voting against the military/security complex is as dangerous as voting against Israel...MORE...
Monday, April 27, 2026
The Jewz are trying to trick Iran into again transferring their enriched Uranium to Russia. This would be suicide. Are they that stupid, or under Satanic possession?
Iran & Russia Join Forces /Lt Col Daniel Davis & Jeremy Scahill...LINK
Chris Moore comments: Scahill is an Anti-Christ "liberal" Bolshevik. He reminds me a lot of fast-talking Paul Krugman, the New York Times establishment jew and confidence man. He could be his long-lost fraternal comrade. He's now breathlessly trying to sell this scheme wherein Iran gives up its nuclear capabilities to double-dealing, fake anti-Bolshevik Vladimir Putin. Skahill knows the jewz will take advantage the second that the enriched uranium is secured by Russia and stab Iran in the back, but wants to come across as a heroic peacemaker. It's pure artifice, left-wing opportunism, and ideological, Anti-Christ Globalism. Scahill probably believes his own schtick. These Jewz and their stooges are that "sincere," psychologically warped, and satanically deranged. Are the Iranians, too?
These Jewz can never be trusted until they publicly confess their "Jewish Century" crimes against humanity and World War incitement, their Satanic, totalitarian Globalist "vision", their personal, death-profiteering, their deceitful double-dealing, and the Anti-Christ error of their ways.
Sunday, April 26, 2026
Trump is lying for the Jewz: US State Department legal memo confirms Washington’s military attacks on Iran were carried out in support of Israel, contradicting Trump's claims
Iran war launched at ‘Israel’s’ request: US memo debunks Trump claims « Aletho News
A US State Department legal memo has confirmed that Washington’s military attacks on Iran were carried out in support of “Israel”, contradicting earlier claims by President Donald Trump that the decision was made independently.
Published on April 21 by Legal Advisor Reed D. Rubinstein on the state government website, the document titled “Operation Epic Fury and International Law” outlines the “justification” for US attacks launched on February 28 against Iranian missile systems, naval assets, production facilities, and nuclear infrastructure.
The memo explicitly states that the United States is engaged in the war “at the request of and in the collective self-defense of its Israeli ally,” invoking Article 51 of the UN Charter.
Trump’s version of the truth
On Monday, Trump insisted that “Israel” did not influence his decision to strike Iran, dismissing reports suggesting coordination with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and rejecting criticism from right-wing commentators.
In a Truth Social post, Trump claimed, “Israel never talked me into the war.”
This isn’t the first time he has pushed back on claims that “Israel” influenced US actions against Iran. In March, Marco Rubio told reporters that “Israel” had reportedly weighed a preemptive strike on Iran, warning it could provoke retaliation against US forces in the region and potentially help set the stage for what became known as “Operation Epic Fury.”
At the time, Trump rejected that framing, telling reporters at the start of an Oval Office meeting with Merz. “If anything, I might have forced Israel’s hand.”
“We were having negotiations with these lunatics, and I thought they were going to strike first. If we didn’t act, they would have,” he said, adding, “It was something that had to be done.”
A memo or an unintended exposé?
At the time, Trump had dismissed suggestions that “Israel” influenced the decision to strike Iran. The memo’s language, however, presents a far clearer picture, emphasizing coordination with and support for the Israeli side as a central legal basis for the operation.
Operation Epic Fury was launched with stated objectives to destroy Iran’s offensive missile capabilities, dismantle its production infrastructure, target naval forces, and prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons. The document further argues that the war is part of a broader, ongoing confrontation driven by what it describes as Iran’s regional activities, including support for allied groups and strikes on US and Israeli targets.
US officials maintain that their war on Iran complies with international law, arguing that it falls within established frameworks governing “self-defense”. Critics, however, have questioned the legality of the attacks under the UN Charter, particularly given the scale of operations, which by early April had involved thousands of attacks before a ceasefire took hold.
The memo also underscores a more politically sensitive point: Washington’s own account now formally acknowledges a role for “Israel” that Trump had previously denied and downplayed...LINK
Iran war launched at ‘Israel’s’ request: US memo debunks Trump claims « Aletho News
A US State Department legal memo has confirmed that Washington’s military attacks on Iran were carried out in support of “Israel”, contradicting earlier claims by President Donald Trump that the decision was made independently.
Published on April 21 by Legal Advisor Reed D. Rubinstein on the state government website, the document titled “Operation Epic Fury and International Law” outlines the “justification” for US attacks launched on February 28 against Iranian missile systems, naval assets, production facilities, and nuclear infrastructure.
The memo explicitly states that the United States is engaged in the war “at the request of and in the collective self-defense of its Israeli ally,” invoking Article 51 of the UN Charter.
Trump’s version of the truth
On Monday, Trump insisted that “Israel” did not influence his decision to strike Iran, dismissing reports suggesting coordination with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and rejecting criticism from right-wing commentators.
In a Truth Social post, Trump claimed, “Israel never talked me into the war.”
This isn’t the first time he has pushed back on claims that “Israel” influenced US actions against Iran. In March, Marco Rubio told reporters that “Israel” had reportedly weighed a preemptive strike on Iran, warning it could provoke retaliation against US forces in the region and potentially help set the stage for what became known as “Operation Epic Fury.”
At the time, Trump rejected that framing, telling reporters at the start of an Oval Office meeting with Merz. “If anything, I might have forced Israel’s hand.”
“We were having negotiations with these lunatics, and I thought they were going to strike first. If we didn’t act, they would have,” he said, adding, “It was something that had to be done.”
A memo or an unintended exposé?
At the time, Trump had dismissed suggestions that “Israel” influenced the decision to strike Iran. The memo’s language, however, presents a far clearer picture, emphasizing coordination with and support for the Israeli side as a central legal basis for the operation.
Operation Epic Fury was launched with stated objectives to destroy Iran’s offensive missile capabilities, dismantle its production infrastructure, target naval forces, and prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons. The document further argues that the war is part of a broader, ongoing confrontation driven by what it describes as Iran’s regional activities, including support for allied groups and strikes on US and Israeli targets.
US officials maintain that their war on Iran complies with international law, arguing that it falls within established frameworks governing “self-defense”. Critics, however, have questioned the legality of the attacks under the UN Charter, particularly given the scale of operations, which by early April had involved thousands of attacks before a ceasefire took hold.
The memo also underscores a more politically sensitive point: Washington’s own account now formally acknowledges a role for “Israel” that Trump had previously denied and downplayed...LINK
Iran war launched at ‘Israel’s’ request: US memo debunks Trump claims « Aletho News
Corrupt and stupid Arab and Muslim governments have rolled over for the Jewz and Greater Israel. So has the corrupt and stupid, occupied JUSA
Trump Backs Down from His Boasting and Blustering about Iran’s Defeat, by Paul Craig Roberts - The Unz Review
It seems only a few hours ago that Trump was boasting that Iran to save itself from annihilation was anxious to make a deal at the renewing of negotiations in Pakistan. This puzzled many as Iran itself had announced that it wasn’t going to any negotiation and would not negotiate with Trump’s two Jewish real estate developers or US VP Vance.
When Trump realized that no Iranians were going to appear, he quickly declared that he held all the cards and said negotiations could await Iran’s acceptance of his terms. For Trump, that is what negotiation is. You accept his terms or get bombed into the stone age.
However, it seems that it is the US presence in the Middle East, now called West Asia, and Israel that will be bombed into the stone age if the conflict renews.
For the Iranians negotiations are pointless. The source of the violence in the Middle East is Israel’s Zionist policy of Greater Israel. Maps held up before TV audiences by Israeli Prime Ministers show the extraordinary expanse of Greater Israel–Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, parts of Egypt, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Turkey, which was recently added to Israel’s claim by former Israeli prime minister Bennett. Some of the maps are shown here at the 9 minute mark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5e08r6O0dk
Video Link
For reasons I cannot explain, the entire Arab/Muslim world has never made an issue of Greater Israel, despite its enormous propaganda value. I suppose the Arab governments, as corrupt as they are, are all bought by Israeli-America. Iran has been content with the Israeli-American propaganda that Iran is the threat, not Greater Israel. This Iranian stupidity has allowed Trump/Netanyahu to paint Iran as the threat. But it is not Iran than is claiming ownership to the Middle East.
Iran is the offended nation, the nation repeatedly attacked by Israeli-America. What is wrong with the Iranian leadership that they permit themselves to be presented as the Threat instead of the Victim? Why is the issue Iran’s right to enrich uranium instead of Iran’s right to exist?
At this time based on current information that might be believable, my view is that Iran holds more cards than Trump, and that Trump wants out and cannot intimidate Iran to give him a free exit. If trump recognizes that he was deceived by Netanyahu about Iran’s weakness and has been made a fool by the Israel Lobby, will the American president remember that he is supposed to represent the American electorate, not Netanyahu’s ambitions of greater Israel, and leave Israel’s fate to the Muslims?
For the first quarter of the 21st century Americans have been fighting wars for greater Israel at the cost of American dead and wounded, at the cost of $10 trillion or one quarter of US national debt, of American deaths of fathers, sons, husbands, daughters, sisters, mothers, wives, and at the cost of America’s reputation. Yet the American President still worships and serves Israel.
Who represents Americans?
Can we get a president of America?...LINK
It seems only a few hours ago that Trump was boasting that Iran to save itself from annihilation was anxious to make a deal at the renewing of negotiations in Pakistan. This puzzled many as Iran itself had announced that it wasn’t going to any negotiation and would not negotiate with Trump’s two Jewish real estate developers or US VP Vance.
When Trump realized that no Iranians were going to appear, he quickly declared that he held all the cards and said negotiations could await Iran’s acceptance of his terms. For Trump, that is what negotiation is. You accept his terms or get bombed into the stone age.
However, it seems that it is the US presence in the Middle East, now called West Asia, and Israel that will be bombed into the stone age if the conflict renews.
For the Iranians negotiations are pointless. The source of the violence in the Middle East is Israel’s Zionist policy of Greater Israel. Maps held up before TV audiences by Israeli Prime Ministers show the extraordinary expanse of Greater Israel–Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, parts of Egypt, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Turkey, which was recently added to Israel’s claim by former Israeli prime minister Bennett. Some of the maps are shown here at the 9 minute mark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5e08r6O0dk
Video Link
For reasons I cannot explain, the entire Arab/Muslim world has never made an issue of Greater Israel, despite its enormous propaganda value. I suppose the Arab governments, as corrupt as they are, are all bought by Israeli-America. Iran has been content with the Israeli-American propaganda that Iran is the threat, not Greater Israel. This Iranian stupidity has allowed Trump/Netanyahu to paint Iran as the threat. But it is not Iran than is claiming ownership to the Middle East.
Iran is the offended nation, the nation repeatedly attacked by Israeli-America. What is wrong with the Iranian leadership that they permit themselves to be presented as the Threat instead of the Victim? Why is the issue Iran’s right to enrich uranium instead of Iran’s right to exist?
At this time based on current information that might be believable, my view is that Iran holds more cards than Trump, and that Trump wants out and cannot intimidate Iran to give him a free exit. If trump recognizes that he was deceived by Netanyahu about Iran’s weakness and has been made a fool by the Israel Lobby, will the American president remember that he is supposed to represent the American electorate, not Netanyahu’s ambitions of greater Israel, and leave Israel’s fate to the Muslims?
For the first quarter of the 21st century Americans have been fighting wars for greater Israel at the cost of American dead and wounded, at the cost of $10 trillion or one quarter of US national debt, of American deaths of fathers, sons, husbands, daughters, sisters, mothers, wives, and at the cost of America’s reputation. Yet the American President still worships and serves Israel.
Who represents Americans?
Can we get a president of America?...LINK
Friday, April 24, 2026
The Jewz have slow-walked Trump and occupied JUSA into adopting their Satanic values as the US Navy just mass-murdered a helpless, surrendered crew on an Iranian frigate -- just like the Jewz did to the USS Liberty in 1967
John Helmer Reports: Israel Has Turned America Into a War Criminal, by Paul Craig Roberts - The Unz Review
John Helmer has published a disturbing report of a US submarine attack on an unarmed Iranian frigate, IRIS Dena, returning from participation in an Indian exercise in the Indian Ocean. https://johnhelmer.net/the-murder-of-the-iris-dena-first-public-testimony-by-the-surviving-captain-and-first-officer/
Washington knew the Iranian ship was unarmed, because only unarmed ships were permitted to participate in the exercise. Seeing an easy target that could not fight back, Washington directed the submarine USS Charlotte to attack the Dena.
The War Criminal Charlotte’s crew’s first torpedo destroyed the ship’s propeller and left the frigate immobile. The Charlotte’s second torpedo hit 90 minutes latter after consultation between the Charlotte, US Navy Command, and the Pentagon. In those 90 minutes the Dena’s captain had assembled the Iranian crew on the aft deck to prepare for evacuation or surrender of the ship.
According to the accustomed laws of naval warfare, if the crew of the damaged ship is assembled to abandon ship, the attacking ship must cease its attack. But the Charlotte received orders to ignore laws of naval warfare and to renew attack on the Iranian frigate in order to give Trump a a “victory” to crow about.
The Charlotte’s second torpedo was unlawful as it was fired to kill life on a disabled ship whose crew was assembled for surrender. The second torpedo hit aft where the crew was assembled, killing 104 assembled for surrender. This war crime reminds of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in 1967 when the Israeli attack on an American ship resulted in 205 dead and wounded Americans. Washington covered up the attack to protect Israel.
Only the captain and first officer on the Dena survived. They were elsewhere in the ship making sure all crew were assembled aft.
Israel’s control over President Trump and his Zionist regime is so complete that Israel has forced America into war criminal behavior as America’s own approach to war. America under Trump now reflects Israel’s war doctrine that there are no limits or restraints on how wars are fought. The primary targets are civilians, women and children and unarmed ships. Washington has adopted Israel’s war doctrine that all protected groups under international law are targets for attack. This leaves the US and Israel as the two–the only–war criminal governments.
By removing all morality from war, Israel and Washington have paved the way for the use of nuclear weapons. When the world ends in mushroom clouds, it will be the gift of Satanic Israel and its two-bit American puppet...LINK
John Helmer Reports: Israel Has Turned America Into a War Criminal, by Paul Craig Roberts - The Unz Review
John Helmer has published a disturbing report of a US submarine attack on an unarmed Iranian frigate, IRIS Dena, returning from participation in an Indian exercise in the Indian Ocean. https://johnhelmer.net/the-murder-of-the-iris-dena-first-public-testimony-by-the-surviving-captain-and-first-officer/
Washington knew the Iranian ship was unarmed, because only unarmed ships were permitted to participate in the exercise. Seeing an easy target that could not fight back, Washington directed the submarine USS Charlotte to attack the Dena.
The War Criminal Charlotte’s crew’s first torpedo destroyed the ship’s propeller and left the frigate immobile. The Charlotte’s second torpedo hit 90 minutes latter after consultation between the Charlotte, US Navy Command, and the Pentagon. In those 90 minutes the Dena’s captain had assembled the Iranian crew on the aft deck to prepare for evacuation or surrender of the ship.
According to the accustomed laws of naval warfare, if the crew of the damaged ship is assembled to abandon ship, the attacking ship must cease its attack. But the Charlotte received orders to ignore laws of naval warfare and to renew attack on the Iranian frigate in order to give Trump a a “victory” to crow about.
The Charlotte’s second torpedo was unlawful as it was fired to kill life on a disabled ship whose crew was assembled for surrender. The second torpedo hit aft where the crew was assembled, killing 104 assembled for surrender. This war crime reminds of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in 1967 when the Israeli attack on an American ship resulted in 205 dead and wounded Americans. Washington covered up the attack to protect Israel.
Only the captain and first officer on the Dena survived. They were elsewhere in the ship making sure all crew were assembled aft.
Israel’s control over President Trump and his Zionist regime is so complete that Israel has forced America into war criminal behavior as America’s own approach to war. America under Trump now reflects Israel’s war doctrine that there are no limits or restraints on how wars are fought. The primary targets are civilians, women and children and unarmed ships. Washington has adopted Israel’s war doctrine that all protected groups under international law are targets for attack. This leaves the US and Israel as the two–the only–war criminal governments.
By removing all morality from war, Israel and Washington have paved the way for the use of nuclear weapons. When the world ends in mushroom clouds, it will be the gift of Satanic Israel and its two-bit American puppet...LINK
John Helmer Reports: Israel Has Turned America Into a War Criminal, by Paul Craig Roberts - The Unz Review
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)