Thursday, August 02, 2012

"Racism originated in the Torah," and other Zionist confessions on the Jewish question

(By Chris Moore) -- There is a common refrain in response to critics of organized Jewry that usually goes something like this: Judaism is an immutable identity. Jewry is an ethnic group, and as such Jews can't change who they are. To make negative generalizations about Jewry is racist and anti-Semitic.

This is complete nonsense, a smokescreen created by Zionists and their Gentile accomplices designed to shield Jewry from legitimate and well-deserved criticism, and to facilitate their joint, syndicate-serving, Jewish supremacist agenda.

Jews are not a race. Jews may or may not be an ethnic group, depending on how one defines "ethnicity." In fact, a strong argument can be made that Judaism is not even a religion in the sense of what most people understand the term "religion" to mean (i.e. a collective striving for God and for goodness)...and perhaps never was.

Not long ago, partially in response to antagonists who insisted that blanket criticism of organized Jewry is "racist," I wrote an article exploring contemporary Jewish identity back to its origins to demonstrate that
the Jews are not a race, and hence can't be victims of racism.

From present to ancient, the journey begins with the Jews themselves and goes back through their alleged ancestors, the Israelites; goes back through the Israelites' alleged ancestors, the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac and Jacob; goes back through Abraham's alleged familial line of descent from Eber (the namesake of the word "Hebrew,"); goes back through Eber's alleged familial line of descent from Noah through his son Shem, the namesake of the word "Shemite," a.k.a. "Semite."

What this journey tells us is that Jewry is not a race unto itself, but rather a splinter group from the vast Semitic "race," which comprises all of the descendants of Shem, and includes all manner of contemporary Arabs, Persians, Ishmaelites, Muslims, Middle Eastern Christians, and many other peoples and tribes who trace their heritage back to Shem by way of the Bible story.

As I noted in my original article,
This is why it's impossible for Arabs, for example, or Persians, to be "anti-Semitic" and/or "racist" against Jews; for them to be racist against Jews would be for them to be racist against their own kin, and even themselves...

The only way Jewry can prove that it is a victim of racist anti-Semitism is to show that the discrimination it faces (from whatever circles) also extends to Jewry's fellow Semites (descendants of Shem).
But the Jewish question doesn't end there; indeed, that's really where the Jewish question begins. For if Jewry is not a race, but rather one splinter tribe or "ethnicity" within a larger "racial" grouping, then what, exactly, defines this tribe?

I maintain that Jewry is and always was defined first and foremost by its own ideological racism, and that Jewry actually invented the concept of "race" itself long ago as a polarizing means to maintain its tribal/national continuity and exclusivity, and to serve its elitist "minority strategy" economic interests, and the economic interests and power ambitions of its priest class in particular.

This is not a novel assessment. Indeed, Jewish religious authorities recently openly declared the Jewish origins of racism when
they proclaimed that "Racism originated in the Torah" (the Torah being most of the books of what traditional Christians have titled the Old Testament, and which track the racial lineage of Jewry through Shem, Eber, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob).

In an age of Western political correctness, and with Israel so reliant upon the West for financial welfare, diplomatic support, and physical protection, why would Jewish religious authorities announce that racism originated in their religious doctrine?

In part, because they seek to justify Jewish ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from
Eretz Israel (the borders of Israel as outlined in the Torah) based on Jewish religious law, tradition and history, which would gain it "legal" validation.

Additionally, no doubt, they seek to bring institutional racism and other Zionist values out of disrepute in the Levant, and even out of disrepute in the West (so long as it is Jewry that is the beneficiary and doing the aggression and discrimination, and is not the group being discriminated against. More on that later).

All of this leads us back to Jewish "identity" (or ethnicity, or tribalism) and organized Jewry's inherently racist code of conduct -- inherent due to the fact that it's based nearly entirely on the inherently racist and supremacist doctrine and dogma of Jewish historiography.

Ironically, in addition to the rabbinical pronouncements cited above that declared the Torah a nakedly racist document, another of the most frank, concise and penetrating assessments of the inherent racism of Jewish ideology and doctrine comes from an anonymous author who appears to be a Judeo-Christian Zionist worshipper of Israel, organized Jewry, and its God, Yahweh,
who writes:
…there are three racial groupings within the Jewish community: Hebrew, mixed-breed Hebrews, and non-Hebrews. This is an established fact within the Jewish community and in their written records, including the scriptures (torah.)

It was considered to be a problem in Jewish society, to have other races or gentiles in ones bloodline...

Interestingly the bible records a fact of Hebrew society -- race is the predominant determinant in selecting the Priestly and Levitical class in Israel.

Moreover, all Israelites were to keep their genetic strain pure. Is racism wrong on its own, aside from hatred? The scriptures (torah) are clear on that point, that racism is a fact of Jewish culture. Israelites are a chosen people firstly based on race...

The scriptures (torah) are plain of a necessity for racial purity within the Levitical class and especially for the Aaronic Priests, in Israelite culture. Israelites themselves were not to mix their seed with that of other nations. Racial purity was a must for ancient Israelites.

Concerning Priests: (Lev 21:13-15 NKJV) 'And he shall take a wife in her virginity. {14} 'A widow or a divorced woman or a defiled woman or a harlot; these he shall not marry; but he shall take a virgin of his own people [tribe] as wife. {15} 'Nor shall he profane his posterity among his people, for I the LORD sanctify him.'"

Concerning Levites and Israelites: (Ezra 9:1-2 NKJV) When these things were done, the leaders came to me, saying, "The people of Israel and the priests and the Levites have not separated themselves from the peoples of the lands, with respect to the abominations of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Jebusites, the Ammonites, the Moabites, the Egyptians, and the Amorites. {2} "For they have taken some of their daughters as wives for themselves and their sons, so that the holy seed is mixed with the peoples of those lands. Indeed, the hand of the leaders and rulers has been foremost in this trespass."

(Ezra 10:3 NKJV) "Now therefore, let us make a covenant with our God to put away all these wives and those who have been born to them, according to the advice of my master and of those who tremble at the commandment of our God; and let it be done according to the law."...

What the principalities and powers do NOT want you to know, is the real cause of racism and its origin! That might cause you to doubt the idea of equality of the races (outsite the borders of their own lands) and question the use of Human Rights legislation.

(Deut 7:6 NKJV) "For you are a holy people to the LORD your God; the LORD your God has chosen you to be a people for Himself, a special treasure above all the peoples on the face of the earth.

(Amos 3:1-2 NKJV) "Hear this word that the LORD has spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt, saying: {2} "You only have I known of all the families of the earth..."

Maybe we should all read The Book, before talking about racism. The origin of racism is from those who HATE the idea of a "chosen people".
This is where both Jewish and Judeo-Christian Zionist mental derangement and delusions of entitlement cross over into the realm of collective group insanity, as epitomized by the anonymous author above, who first goes to great pains to document how racism originated in the Torah (a position confirmed by Jewish religious authorities) but then in the next breath declares that "The origin of racism is from those who HATE the idea of a "chosen people".

What the author really means, and what both Jewish and Gentile Zionists truly believe, is that those who resist Jewish supremacy and the Zionist agenda are bad actors getting in the way of their God's (Yahweh) racist, hierarchical, caste-system plan for humanity that places Jewry at the top of the pyramid, and Jewry's Judeo-Christian Zionist accomplices at "the right hand of the Mighty One."


In their deranged, lunatic minds, anyone who gets in the way of their objectively racist (indeed, self-identified racist) ideology and agenda to impose Jewry upon the world as its "chosen" priest class is racist for opposing this racist Zionist agenda...for opposing the concept that the Jews are a chosen master race that should rule over humanity with an iron rod.

Could there possibly be a more
anti-Christian, anti-Western, institutionally racist "vision" for humanity than this twisted, bastardized fusion of Jewish, Judeo-Christian Zionist and End Times doctrine?

Could there possibly be a more dangerous, poisonous, warped and dishonest set of bedfellows than Judeo-Christian Zionists and Zionist Jews, with their sinister, subversive, anti-democratic, subterranean agenda?

For those who still doubt that "racism originated in the Torah" and with organized Jewry, or who doubt that organized Jewry and its allies, accomplices, lackeys and enablers are pursuing an ancient, self-serving, crypto-supremacist agenda, I've compiled a further set of links that confirm what, thanks to the Internet, ever more Americans and much of the world can increasingly see for themselves: Particularistic and supremacist ideological Zionists are unfit to lead the U.S. and Western civilization; indeed, their entire essence and agenda is hostile to the West's most cherished and sacred tenets and ideals of representative government, equality, freedom and the rule of constitutional law enshrining rights for all.


Jewish doctrine vowing to indebt, enslave and murder non-Jews has been staring us in the face for centuries

Organized Jewry’s misanthropic, genocidal religious doctrine, ethos and agenda from Old Testament through Talmud...and how Jesus intended to break it

Some of the racist, anti-Gentile Jewish rhetoric and historiography that forms the doctrinal underpinnings of Judeofascist ideology

Israel's racist rabbis only being true to their Talmudic Jewish faith

Leading rabbis say Judaism inherently racist, cite Jewish scripture as rationale for institutional racism, segregation in Israel

Top rabbis move to forbid renting homes to Arabs, say 'racism originated in the Torah'

In light of its racist doctrine and subversive, supremacist agenda, is it any wonder that the Jewish ideology and its caretakers have been under duress from Western civilization and Christendom for centuries, and will likely (and deservedly) soon be again?

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Racism originated in the Torah," and other Zionist confessions on the Jewish question"

And in the Jewish bible
read chapter three from the link below if you have time.


THE LEVITES AND THE LAW...13

http://www.controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/index.htm

Pip said...

Senior Israeli archaeologist casts doubt on Jewish heritage of Jerusalem


On the alleged Temple of Solomon, Finkelstein said that there is no archaeological evidence to prove it really existed.
A senior archaeologist at Tel Aviv University has cast doubt on the alleged Jewish heritage of Jerusalem. Israel Finkelstein's claims have been made in the face of official Israeli and biblical claims to the occupied city.

Professor Finkelstein, who is known as "the father of biblical archaeology", told the Jerusalem Post that Jewish archaeologists have found no historical or archaeological evidence to back the biblical narrative on the Exodus, the Jews' wandering in Sinai or Joshua's conquest of Canaan. On the alleged Temple of Solomon, Finkelstein said that there is no archaeological evidence to prove it really existed.

According to Finkelstein's university colleague, archaeology lecturer Rafi Greenberg, Israel is supposed to find something if it digs for a period of six weeks. But, Greenberg told the Jerusalem Post, Israelis have been excavating the so-called City of David in the occupied Jerusalem neighbourhood of Silwan for two years to no avail.

Professor Yoni Mizrahi, an independent archaeologist who has worked with the International Atomic Energy Agency, agreed with Israel Finkelstein. He said that the right-wing Elad Association has not found anything "saying welcome to David's palace" although that was taken for granted by Elad, as if the group depended on scriptural texts to guide them in their work.

larry said...

THE JUDAS OF ISLAM
There’s always a Jew around to screw up the works!
In the Gospels it’s Judas of Iscariot and later the Pharisee Saul of Tarsus preaches a False Christ and a False gospel. In Islam we find the “Judas” is the man known to us as Abu Bakr, the first Caliph, but who was in fact:
[ABU BAKR WAS A JEWISH RABBI]

Rabbi Shallum, son of the then Resh Gelutha, in Babel, perceiving this dreadful predicament, went to Mahomed, and offering him his submission, friendship, and services, endeavoured to enter with him into a friendly compact. Mahomed accepted his proposition with pleasure, conceived a great affection for him, and took his daughter, a handsome young girl, for wife; he made him also a general in his army, and gave him the name of Abu Bachr al Chaliva al Zadik, literally:

The father of the maiden, the descendant of the righteous; this means, that of all his wives, who were either widows or divorced women, this one was the only one who had never been married before, and then she was the granddaughter of the celebrated chief of the captivity; therefore, the descendant of the righteous. This occurrence induced Mahomed to give up his terrible intention to destroy the Jews in his country, and thus did Rabbi Shallum save his people.

THE BETRAYAL

[Why Muhammad hated alcohol]

Abu Bachr and Aliman now resolved among themselves to remove the dangerous enemy of the Jews, Bucheran. One evening Mahomed, Bucheran, Aliman, and Abu Bachr, were drinking together; the latter two soon saw that Mahomed and the astrologer were strongly intoxicated, and lay stretched out in a deep and profound sleep. Abu Bachr thereupon drew the sword of Mahomed from its scabbard, cut off therewith Bucharan's head, and put the bloody sword back into its receptacle, and both then lay themselves down quietly near Mahomed to sleep. When Mahomed awoke and saw his friend lying decapitated near him, he cried out in a fury: "This terrible deed has been done by one of us three in our drunkenness!" Abu Bachr thereupon said quite unconcernedly: "Let each one draw his sword, and he whose weapon is stained with blood, must needs be the murderer!" They all drew their swords, and that of Mahomed was completely dyed with fresh blood, which proved thus clearly to his satisfaction that he had murdered his friend. He was greatly grieved at this discovery; cursed and condemned the wine which was the cause of this murder, and swore that he never would drink any more, and that also no one should do so who wishes to enter heaven. This is the cause why wine is prohibited to the Mahomedans.

At a later period, Mahomed learned the whole transaction, and that his father-in-law was the perpetrator of the bloody deed; wherefore, he lost his favour, and he would not permit him to come before him. Abu Bachr went thereupon and conquered sixty places, which had not yet submitted to Mahomed, and presented them to him, through which means he became again reconciled to him, was received in favour, and remained thereafter at court.

HISTORY OF PALESTINE
614-1096 C.E.
From the Accession of the Mahomedans to that of the Europeans.

By Rabbi Joseph Schwarz, 1850