Robert Barnes: Yemen Strikes Saudi Airport and Air Base After Sana'a Bombing...LINK
Monday, July 13, 2026
Wednesday, July 08, 2026
Sunday, July 05, 2026
Saturday, July 04, 2026
Democracy is contrary to the legitimate interests of the citizens as well as to the superior interests of the Nation (because jewz, the Judas class, and the Anti-Christ character of the world)
Democracy, a Cesspool of Mediocrity Run by Hostile, Self-Serving Elites – The Occidental Observer
Editor’s note: Since today is 250th birthday of the American experiment in democracy, this article is particularly relevant, coming as it does in the aftermath of Trump’s betrayal by attacking Iran on behalf of Israel and illustrating once again the conflict between American national interests and the power of the Israel Lobby and its financial and media influence—not to mention the huge increase in the wealth of Trump and his family (at least $2.7 billion).
'The State is the coldest of cold monsters. It lies coldly; and this is the lie that escapes from its mouth: “I the State, I am the people.”'
Friedrich Nietzsche
The best critique of democracy, the most “documented, clear, tight and implacable”[1] is without any doubt that of Jean Haupt. After having analyzed all its mechanisms, i.e., its founding principles, universal suffrage, the competence of elected officials, parties, parliament, the government, and the head of state, Haupt concludes that democracy is contrary to the legitimate interests of the citizens as well as to the superior interests of the Nation.[2]
This is an astonishing, even scandalous statement for the vast majority of Westerners who swear only by democracy, but is Jean Haupt, right? Let’s take a close look at all its mechanism.
Founding Principles of Democracy
The sacrosanct trilogy of Masonic origin “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity” is the keystone of all democracies. Three magic words with strong connotations, but which contain a whole world of contradictions. It is indeed impossible. In the words of English specialist on subversive movements, Nesta H. Webster,
"to have complete liberty and equality, the two are mutually exclusive. It is possible to have a system of complete liberty in which every man is free to behave as he pleases, to do what he will with his own, to rob or to murder, to live, that is to say, under the law of the jungle, rule by the strongest, but there is no equality there. Or one may have a system of absolute equality, of cutting every one down to the same dead level, of crushing all incentive in man to rise above his fellows, but there is no liberty there. So Grand Orient Freemasonry, by coupling together two words for ever incompatible, threw into the arena an apple of discord over which the world has never ceased to quarrel from that day to this, and which has throughout divided the revolutionary forces into two opposing camps."[3]
As for fraternity, it is the most blatant of impostures:
"Fraternity, the darling child of democracy, was baptized in a bloodbath [the French Revolution of 1789], and that was not to be the last! Never have men been so betrayed, hated, envied, robbed, tortured, murdered, massacred, as since the Fraternity was inscribed on the pediment of our public buildings. It is enough to go through the history of the last hundred and fifty years to notice that democracy is an endemic and permanent civil war."[4]
Thus, by coupling three terms that are forever incompatible, the people and their vassals, who rule over us have introduced into the social arena a permanent bone of contention. And it is precisely because of this “divide and rule” strategy that Louis-Ferdinand CĂ©line, one of the greatest writers of the last century, thought democracy was the perfect cover for Jewish dictatorship.[5]
As noted by retired professor of humanities, Thomas Dalton, democracy is a political system used by Jewish elites to acquire wealth, control mass media, and influence politicians while remaining hidden from the public. This materialistic and anti-spiritual “judeocratie,” concludes Dalton, elevates “mediocre” and easy-to-manipulate politicians such as Donald Trump and the Young Leaders of the World Economic Forum—Angela Merkel, Tony Blair, Justin Trudeau, Emmanuel Macron, and Jacinda Arden—to serve Jewish interests at the expense of their own citizens. [6]
In Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler says the following about democracy:
"Democracy has become a tool in the hand of that [Jewish] race that, because of its inner goals, must shun the open light — as it has always done and will always do. Only the Jew can praise an institution which is as corrupt and false as himself." [7]
As enemy of mediocrity Ezra Pound says: “Democracy is now currently defined in Europe as ‘a country run by Jews.’”[8]
Freedom of Thought
Is freedom of thought guaranteed in a democracy? No, says Jean Haupt, because
"men, nowadays, whoever they are, wherever they are, are subjected, hour by hour, in the street, in the office, in the factory, in the workshop, in their work, in their leisure, and in their distractions, and even in the intimacy of their homes, through the intermediary of the image, book, press, cinema, radio, and television, to the constant, permanent, invasive, declared or insidious, brutal, or underhanded action of undemocratic propaganda."[9]
Everything that does not contribute to the glory of democracy is hidden. And since the media are owned by the ruling oligarchs, they have complete control over the political affairs of the country. Democracy in this sense is an authoritarian government that does not say its name. It does not tolerate dissonance and takes all means at its disposal to bring to heel those who do not adhere to the official version of things. Thus, to put it like Jean Haupt: “The happy citizens of a democracy are as free as one who is condemned to death is free to move, chains on his feet, in the two square meters of his cell…”[10]...MORE...
Democracy, a Cesspool of Mediocrity Run by Hostile, Self-Serving Elites – The Occidental Observer
Editor’s note: Since today is 250th birthday of the American experiment in democracy, this article is particularly relevant, coming as it does in the aftermath of Trump’s betrayal by attacking Iran on behalf of Israel and illustrating once again the conflict between American national interests and the power of the Israel Lobby and its financial and media influence—not to mention the huge increase in the wealth of Trump and his family (at least $2.7 billion).
'The State is the coldest of cold monsters. It lies coldly; and this is the lie that escapes from its mouth: “I the State, I am the people.”'
Friedrich Nietzsche
The best critique of democracy, the most “documented, clear, tight and implacable”[1] is without any doubt that of Jean Haupt. After having analyzed all its mechanisms, i.e., its founding principles, universal suffrage, the competence of elected officials, parties, parliament, the government, and the head of state, Haupt concludes that democracy is contrary to the legitimate interests of the citizens as well as to the superior interests of the Nation.[2]
This is an astonishing, even scandalous statement for the vast majority of Westerners who swear only by democracy, but is Jean Haupt, right? Let’s take a close look at all its mechanism.
Founding Principles of Democracy
The sacrosanct trilogy of Masonic origin “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity” is the keystone of all democracies. Three magic words with strong connotations, but which contain a whole world of contradictions. It is indeed impossible. In the words of English specialist on subversive movements, Nesta H. Webster,
"to have complete liberty and equality, the two are mutually exclusive. It is possible to have a system of complete liberty in which every man is free to behave as he pleases, to do what he will with his own, to rob or to murder, to live, that is to say, under the law of the jungle, rule by the strongest, but there is no equality there. Or one may have a system of absolute equality, of cutting every one down to the same dead level, of crushing all incentive in man to rise above his fellows, but there is no liberty there. So Grand Orient Freemasonry, by coupling together two words for ever incompatible, threw into the arena an apple of discord over which the world has never ceased to quarrel from that day to this, and which has throughout divided the revolutionary forces into two opposing camps."[3]
As for fraternity, it is the most blatant of impostures:
"Fraternity, the darling child of democracy, was baptized in a bloodbath [the French Revolution of 1789], and that was not to be the last! Never have men been so betrayed, hated, envied, robbed, tortured, murdered, massacred, as since the Fraternity was inscribed on the pediment of our public buildings. It is enough to go through the history of the last hundred and fifty years to notice that democracy is an endemic and permanent civil war."[4]
Thus, by coupling three terms that are forever incompatible, the people and their vassals, who rule over us have introduced into the social arena a permanent bone of contention. And it is precisely because of this “divide and rule” strategy that Louis-Ferdinand CĂ©line, one of the greatest writers of the last century, thought democracy was the perfect cover for Jewish dictatorship.[5]
As noted by retired professor of humanities, Thomas Dalton, democracy is a political system used by Jewish elites to acquire wealth, control mass media, and influence politicians while remaining hidden from the public. This materialistic and anti-spiritual “judeocratie,” concludes Dalton, elevates “mediocre” and easy-to-manipulate politicians such as Donald Trump and the Young Leaders of the World Economic Forum—Angela Merkel, Tony Blair, Justin Trudeau, Emmanuel Macron, and Jacinda Arden—to serve Jewish interests at the expense of their own citizens. [6]
In Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler says the following about democracy:
"Democracy has become a tool in the hand of that [Jewish] race that, because of its inner goals, must shun the open light — as it has always done and will always do. Only the Jew can praise an institution which is as corrupt and false as himself." [7]
As enemy of mediocrity Ezra Pound says: “Democracy is now currently defined in Europe as ‘a country run by Jews.’”[8]
Freedom of Thought
Is freedom of thought guaranteed in a democracy? No, says Jean Haupt, because
"men, nowadays, whoever they are, wherever they are, are subjected, hour by hour, in the street, in the office, in the factory, in the workshop, in their work, in their leisure, and in their distractions, and even in the intimacy of their homes, through the intermediary of the image, book, press, cinema, radio, and television, to the constant, permanent, invasive, declared or insidious, brutal, or underhanded action of undemocratic propaganda."[9]
Everything that does not contribute to the glory of democracy is hidden. And since the media are owned by the ruling oligarchs, they have complete control over the political affairs of the country. Democracy in this sense is an authoritarian government that does not say its name. It does not tolerate dissonance and takes all means at its disposal to bring to heel those who do not adhere to the official version of things. Thus, to put it like Jean Haupt: “The happy citizens of a democracy are as free as one who is condemned to death is free to move, chains on his feet, in the two square meters of his cell…”[10]...MORE...
Democracy, a Cesspool of Mediocrity Run by Hostile, Self-Serving Elites – The Occidental Observer
Thursday, July 02, 2026
Smirking, primitive, Juden-fascist ghoul, fifth columnist and former Yeltsin ear-whisperer Sergey Karagonov wants Russia to nuke "evil" and "racist" Europe and Germany, but gets owned by Israel critic John Mearsheimer, author of The Israel Lobby
John Mearsheimer & Sergey Karaganov: Nuclear Strike on Europe to Restore Deterrence...LINK
Chris Moore comments:
Sergey Karaganov, a typically schizophrenic, grifter jew, is reverting from Marxist atheism to pious religiosity, talking about the "Almighty", "sin" and returning to a world that fears God.
These jewz can't get their stories straight, and can't maintain any level of intellectual consistency, because they are pathological liars, natural born killers (human sacrifice), and golden calf grifters.
So too the coterie of sub-human (on the level of animals) stooges that flatter and pander to them, and join in their Anti-Chris debauchery and murderous orgy of corruption, degeneracy and violence.
Wednesday, July 01, 2026
Chris Moore comments on "Is Russia Going To Attack Western Europe?" by Povl H. Riis-Knudsen, Occidental Observer, June 30, 2026
Original article: Is Russia Going To Attack Western Europe? – The Occidental Observer
Chris Moore comments:
The Russian Juden-fascist Sergey Karagonov -- an oft-quoted academic and security expert -- is doing his part to demonize Europeans as “the source of all evil in human history”…
https://www.unz.com/runz/how-russia-can-defeat-ukraine-and-nato/#the-dangerous-notions-of-sergey-karaganov
…and talking about Russia nuking them, implying this would NOT be a moral atrocity.
He has special enmity for Germany, and said Stalin made a mistake by opposing the (Juden-fascist) Morganthau plan, and apparently wants to see it brought to completion.
He serves a similar function as the Juden-fascist Dmitry Medvedev, the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, who also regularly threatens to nuke Europe.
Obviously, all of these jews are working for Judeofascist Israel and the international Zionist agenda, NOT for the countries in which they reside (or resided, in the case of the jew Morganthau).
These murderous, psychopathic, human sacrificing, anarchist Judeofascists golden calf degenerates all need to be sent to hell, to be with their father, the Devil.
This is per Moses. This is per Jesus Christ.
Chris Moore comments:
The Russian Juden-fascist Sergey Karagonov -- an oft-quoted academic and security expert -- is doing his part to demonize Europeans as “the source of all evil in human history”…
https://www.unz.com/runz/how-russia-can-defeat-ukraine-and-nato/#the-dangerous-notions-of-sergey-karaganov
…and talking about Russia nuking them, implying this would NOT be a moral atrocity.
He has special enmity for Germany, and said Stalin made a mistake by opposing the (Juden-fascist) Morganthau plan, and apparently wants to see it brought to completion.
He serves a similar function as the Juden-fascist Dmitry Medvedev, the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, who also regularly threatens to nuke Europe.
Obviously, all of these jews are working for Judeofascist Israel and the international Zionist agenda, NOT for the countries in which they reside (or resided, in the case of the jew Morganthau).
These murderous, psychopathic, human sacrificing, anarchist Judeofascists golden calf degenerates all need to be sent to hell, to be with their father, the Devil.
This is per Moses. This is per Jesus Christ.
Monday, June 29, 2026
International jewry contrived the "Holocaust" hoax, and it's been off to the races ever since
The Hoax that won't die, by Carolyn Yeager - The Unz Review
“the first and continuing reports that Jews were being wiped out by the Nazis in Poland were supplied to newspapers around the world by the World Jewish Congress” … HOAX
“the first information about Hitler’s decision to ‘exterminate’ European Jewry — attributed to an annonymous German industrialist who is said to have visited Switzerland in July 1942 — came from the World Jewish Congress” …HOAX
“the first ‘eyewitness’ account of the inner working of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Gas Chamber/Crematorium complex came from two escaped Slovakian Jews working with the World Jewish Congress” …HOAX
THE HOLOCAUST IS A HOAX that’s already been unmasked. But the Establishment won’t give it up.
Instead of a hoax, we could call it a sleight-of-hand, in the sense of the tricks magicians use. (‘Hoax’ derives from the magic incantation hocus pocus). We could call it a myth, except that it was deliberately created to deceive and gain advantage, and continues to be upheld for that purpose. We could call it war propaganda that got out of control, and indeed it has slipped out of its World War II niche and become a free-standing phenomenon, fueling the world-wide ‘campaigns against anti-Semitism’ with ever-expanding laws that forbid speaking ill of Jews and/or Israel.
But it is properly called a hoax because it was deliberately created by a few men in the upper ranks of the World Jewish Congress (WJC) utilizing their tight network of influential, well-placed accomplices throughout Europe, Britain and the United States.
It was inspired by rumors circulated by Polish and Jewish inmates at the Auschwitz-Birkinau work/concentration/transit camp located in Poland near the sprawling I.G. Farben Buna Rubber installation.
Some of these inmates organized into secret underground networks that maintained wireless communication to the Polish Government-in-Exile in London. All this was told in the book released in 1976 by Arthur R. Butz, Ph.D., The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, which I quoted extensively from here and will refer to later.
This year, as every year since a resolution was passed in 2005 by a voice vote in the United Nations, the World Jewish Congress leads the way in recognizing and promoting a commemoration popularly known as “International Holocaust Remembrance Day.” The media faithfully plays up the day, and governments throughout the Western world pay tribute. Amazing when you think about its reach.
THIS YEAR the World Jewish Congress has announced that “social media giants” are joining with them in 2019 to create “mass global awareness” ahead of the Israel-initiated commemoration day (however, it looks like only Twitter came through). Along with the United Nations, the world-wide media, and major government leaders, the Memorial Museum at Auschwitz-Birkenau also recognizes the day with special events. January 27, 1945 was chosen because it is the day it is claimed the Auschwitz camp was ‘liberated’ by the Red Army.
Yes, it’s amazing how much of our Reality is created and developed without our decision, but simply our acquiescence in seemingly harmless (and usually disguised in moral terms) votes in large bodies such as the UN general assembly or Congressional and parliamentary bodies.
In the articles that I have previously published on the WJC (especially here, here and here), drawing on the work of esteemed historians and revisionists, the answer to who, what, why of the Holocaust has already been presented. In this article I will pull all this information together in an attempt to make the full case as to why the hoax of the Holocaust can be attributed to the World Jewish Congress far more than to any other single entity. We will see that the very first unconfirmed reports of mass shootings of Jews came from the World Jewish Congress, as well as the first unconfirmed reports of gas chambers and mass cremations came also from the WJC...MORE...
The Hoax that won't die, by Carolyn Yeager - The Unz Review
“the first and continuing reports that Jews were being wiped out by the Nazis in Poland were supplied to newspapers around the world by the World Jewish Congress” … HOAX
“the first information about Hitler’s decision to ‘exterminate’ European Jewry — attributed to an annonymous German industrialist who is said to have visited Switzerland in July 1942 — came from the World Jewish Congress” …HOAX
“the first ‘eyewitness’ account of the inner working of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Gas Chamber/Crematorium complex came from two escaped Slovakian Jews working with the World Jewish Congress” …HOAX
THE HOLOCAUST IS A HOAX that’s already been unmasked. But the Establishment won’t give it up.
Instead of a hoax, we could call it a sleight-of-hand, in the sense of the tricks magicians use. (‘Hoax’ derives from the magic incantation hocus pocus). We could call it a myth, except that it was deliberately created to deceive and gain advantage, and continues to be upheld for that purpose. We could call it war propaganda that got out of control, and indeed it has slipped out of its World War II niche and become a free-standing phenomenon, fueling the world-wide ‘campaigns against anti-Semitism’ with ever-expanding laws that forbid speaking ill of Jews and/or Israel.
But it is properly called a hoax because it was deliberately created by a few men in the upper ranks of the World Jewish Congress (WJC) utilizing their tight network of influential, well-placed accomplices throughout Europe, Britain and the United States.
It was inspired by rumors circulated by Polish and Jewish inmates at the Auschwitz-Birkinau work/concentration/transit camp located in Poland near the sprawling I.G. Farben Buna Rubber installation.
Some of these inmates organized into secret underground networks that maintained wireless communication to the Polish Government-in-Exile in London. All this was told in the book released in 1976 by Arthur R. Butz, Ph.D., The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, which I quoted extensively from here and will refer to later.
This year, as every year since a resolution was passed in 2005 by a voice vote in the United Nations, the World Jewish Congress leads the way in recognizing and promoting a commemoration popularly known as “International Holocaust Remembrance Day.” The media faithfully plays up the day, and governments throughout the Western world pay tribute. Amazing when you think about its reach.
THIS YEAR the World Jewish Congress has announced that “social media giants” are joining with them in 2019 to create “mass global awareness” ahead of the Israel-initiated commemoration day (however, it looks like only Twitter came through). Along with the United Nations, the world-wide media, and major government leaders, the Memorial Museum at Auschwitz-Birkenau also recognizes the day with special events. January 27, 1945 was chosen because it is the day it is claimed the Auschwitz camp was ‘liberated’ by the Red Army.
Yes, it’s amazing how much of our Reality is created and developed without our decision, but simply our acquiescence in seemingly harmless (and usually disguised in moral terms) votes in large bodies such as the UN general assembly or Congressional and parliamentary bodies.
In the articles that I have previously published on the WJC (especially here, here and here), drawing on the work of esteemed historians and revisionists, the answer to who, what, why of the Holocaust has already been presented. In this article I will pull all this information together in an attempt to make the full case as to why the hoax of the Holocaust can be attributed to the World Jewish Congress far more than to any other single entity. We will see that the very first unconfirmed reports of mass shootings of Jews came from the World Jewish Congress, as well as the first unconfirmed reports of gas chambers and mass cremations came also from the WJC...MORE...
The Hoax that won't die, by Carolyn Yeager - The Unz Review
Saturday, June 27, 2026
(((Soros)))-backed NGO condemns Germany's most popular party, Alternative for Germany, as unconstitutional. Alternative for Germany is opposed to Soros' Ukrainian Juden-fascist comrade, (((Zelensky)))
Soros-backed NGO condemns Germany’s most popular party as ‘unconstitutional’ — RT World News
The Society for Civil Rights has called out the right-wing Alternative for Germany for its tough stance on immigration and alleged efforts to erode democratic processes
A left-liberal German NGO has made a case for declaring the country’s largest populist party unconstitutional. The Society for Civil Rights argues that the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party’s platform and rhetoric regarding immigration, citizenship, and minority groups constitute sufficient grounds to ban it under the country’s strict post-war democratic laws.
The AfD, which advocates for tougher immigration laws and opposes Germany’s support for Ukraine, came in second at 20% in last year’s federal elections. An INSA opinion poll earlier this month indicated that the AfD had emerged as Germany’s most popular party with 29% support.
On Thursday, the Society for Civil Rights, an organization resembling the American Civil Liberties Union which receives funding from George Soros’ Open Societies Foundations, presented its 1,500-page “expert report” claiming that the right-wing party’s positions on multiple hot-button issues are in breach of the German Basic Law.
”The expert opinion is unequivocal: The AfD is unconstitutional,” the paper, which supposedly draws on millions of social media posts by party members as well as press releases and parliamentary documents, concludes.
According to the NGO, the federal government still has not banned the party because the AfD presumably “formulates its anti-constitutional positions in such a way that domestic intelligence agencies find as little evidence as possible of an anti-constitutional orientation.”
In its analysis, the Society for Civil Rights claims that the party supposedly “intends to persecute its political opponents.” It cites images of prominent political figures behind bars found on AfD-related social media accounts as well as demands to bring members of other parties before court.
Moreover, the party advocates an “ethnically and culturally defined concept of the nation” and wants to strip naturalized citizens and dual nationals who have committed crimes of their citizenship, the paper says.
The NGO has also taken issue with the fact that the AfD has proposed granting family loans solely to parents who both hold German citizenship. Another problematic policy that presumably points to the party’s unconstitutionality is the AfD’s calls to make the deportation of failed asylum seekers easier.
According to the Society for Civil Rights, the AfD’s demands for a ban on Islamic headscarves in public institutions as well as the construction of minarets in Germany are also inexcusable under the country’s constitution.
One more cause for concern for the liberal NGO is the party’s refusal to pander to transgender narratives and its belief that there are only two biological sexes. “The AfD advocates for a societal ‘model of the normal family’ consisting of a father, mother, and as many children as possible,” the paper laments.
The Society for Civil Rights has argued that the party must be outlawed as soon as possible as “it succeeds in mobilizing supporters and drawing attention to its issues.”
“It is the second-largest party in the Bundestag and is represented in 15 of the 16 state parliaments,” the NGO has warned.
On its website, the Society for Civil Rights lists among its donors the Open Society Foundations and its European offshoot, which were founded by Soros, who has injected more than $32 billion into the network.
Critics have long accused the Hungarian-born billionaire of fomenting various protest movements across the world, interfering in elections, and attempting to suppress dissenting views.
Meanwhile, the AfD has for years faced significant pressure from regional and federal authorities in Germany. Last week, the Bavarian Administrative Court of Appeal gave the local office of Germany’s domestic intelligence agency the green light to continue surveilling the local chapter of the AfD...MORE...
Soros-backed NGO condemns Germany’s most popular party as ‘unconstitutional’ — RT World News
A left-liberal German NGO has made a case for declaring the country’s largest populist party unconstitutional. The Society for Civil Rights argues that the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party’s platform and rhetoric regarding immigration, citizenship, and minority groups constitute sufficient grounds to ban it under the country’s strict post-war democratic laws.
The AfD, which advocates for tougher immigration laws and opposes Germany’s support for Ukraine, came in second at 20% in last year’s federal elections. An INSA opinion poll earlier this month indicated that the AfD had emerged as Germany’s most popular party with 29% support.
On Thursday, the Society for Civil Rights, an organization resembling the American Civil Liberties Union which receives funding from George Soros’ Open Societies Foundations, presented its 1,500-page “expert report” claiming that the right-wing party’s positions on multiple hot-button issues are in breach of the German Basic Law.
”The expert opinion is unequivocal: The AfD is unconstitutional,” the paper, which supposedly draws on millions of social media posts by party members as well as press releases and parliamentary documents, concludes.
According to the NGO, the federal government still has not banned the party because the AfD presumably “formulates its anti-constitutional positions in such a way that domestic intelligence agencies find as little evidence as possible of an anti-constitutional orientation.”
In its analysis, the Society for Civil Rights claims that the party supposedly “intends to persecute its political opponents.” It cites images of prominent political figures behind bars found on AfD-related social media accounts as well as demands to bring members of other parties before court.
Moreover, the party advocates an “ethnically and culturally defined concept of the nation” and wants to strip naturalized citizens and dual nationals who have committed crimes of their citizenship, the paper says.
The NGO has also taken issue with the fact that the AfD has proposed granting family loans solely to parents who both hold German citizenship. Another problematic policy that presumably points to the party’s unconstitutionality is the AfD’s calls to make the deportation of failed asylum seekers easier.
According to the Society for Civil Rights, the AfD’s demands for a ban on Islamic headscarves in public institutions as well as the construction of minarets in Germany are also inexcusable under the country’s constitution.
One more cause for concern for the liberal NGO is the party’s refusal to pander to transgender narratives and its belief that there are only two biological sexes. “The AfD advocates for a societal ‘model of the normal family’ consisting of a father, mother, and as many children as possible,” the paper laments.
The Society for Civil Rights has argued that the party must be outlawed as soon as possible as “it succeeds in mobilizing supporters and drawing attention to its issues.”
“It is the second-largest party in the Bundestag and is represented in 15 of the 16 state parliaments,” the NGO has warned.
On its website, the Society for Civil Rights lists among its donors the Open Society Foundations and its European offshoot, which were founded by Soros, who has injected more than $32 billion into the network.
Critics have long accused the Hungarian-born billionaire of fomenting various protest movements across the world, interfering in elections, and attempting to suppress dissenting views.
Meanwhile, the AfD has for years faced significant pressure from regional and federal authorities in Germany. Last week, the Bavarian Administrative Court of Appeal gave the local office of Germany’s domestic intelligence agency the green light to continue surveilling the local chapter of the AfD...MORE...
Soros-backed NGO condemns Germany’s most popular party as ‘unconstitutional’ — RT World News
Wednesday, June 24, 2026
Chris Moore comments on "Prof. Andrew Fraser’s Critique of the WASPs" by Kevin MacDonald, Occidental Observer, June 24, 2026
Original Article: Prof. Andrew Fraser’s Critique of the WASPs – The Occidental Observer
Chris Moore comments:
No adult human being has the “right” to live as a savage after Jesus Christ came.
“When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me.” — 1 Corinthians 13:11
“The desire of Europeans to assimilate with the Jews was always a one-way street.” — Kevin MacDonald
This was/is the desire of a subset of Europeans to cling to their savage nature, and not graduate to their God given (and nature given) duty to evolve into human beings. So the jews they wanted to “assimilate” with (breed with) they viewed as more in touch with the true savage essence of humanity and nature, as opposed to the Christian-civilized Europeans (Christendom).
As stated, true human beings have an obligation to live as human beings, whereas animals cannot live as human beings (as Moses concluded with the golden calf incident, thus rightly dealing with the savage hebrews/hebroids as if they were unevolved and incapable of evolving animals, which as it turns out they were, for these are the jew devils and their demon stooges attempting to destroy the civilized world again today).
Any human being that wants to save savage nature should save the whales (or pursue some other environmental cause), not save the savage jews and their equally savage stooges/partners in crimes against civilization.
Chris Moore comments:
“The fact that the king tried first to convert the Jews indicates that European societies were not self-consciously based on blood ties. Attempts to convert Jews were a common phenomenon during the Middle Ages throughout Europe. The only important case where Jews actually converted was in Spain (the original conversions were the result of force), but then the issue became the sincerity of the converts and their continued ethnic cohesion and cooperation, leading ultimately to the Inquisition.[3] The desire of Europeans to assimilate with the Jews was always a one-way street.” — Kevin MacDonaldThe stiff-necked Satanist has no real desire to civilize itself. It believes “civilization” is anathema to its right to live “free” and “in the wild” as an animal. And if forced to pose as a human being, it only seeks to better itself for some material advantage, which will afford it the ability to revert to its savagery, only with the material protection of wealth.
No adult human being has the “right” to live as a savage after Jesus Christ came.
“When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me.” — 1 Corinthians 13:11
“The desire of Europeans to assimilate with the Jews was always a one-way street.” — Kevin MacDonald
This was/is the desire of a subset of Europeans to cling to their savage nature, and not graduate to their God given (and nature given) duty to evolve into human beings. So the jews they wanted to “assimilate” with (breed with) they viewed as more in touch with the true savage essence of humanity and nature, as opposed to the Christian-civilized Europeans (Christendom).
As stated, true human beings have an obligation to live as human beings, whereas animals cannot live as human beings (as Moses concluded with the golden calf incident, thus rightly dealing with the savage hebrews/hebroids as if they were unevolved and incapable of evolving animals, which as it turns out they were, for these are the jew devils and their demon stooges attempting to destroy the civilized world again today).
Any human being that wants to save savage nature should save the whales (or pursue some other environmental cause), not save the savage jews and their equally savage stooges/partners in crimes against civilization.
Saving the jews is a nihilistic death wish for themselves and for humanity.
Sunday, June 21, 2026
The sick, corrupt and degenerate U.S. Deep State is butting heads with the sick, corrupt and degenerate Judeofascists
Prof. John Mearsheimer: Israel Undermining US/Iran Deal (Transcript) – The Singju Post
...Unconditional Surrender?
JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO: …is really rather remarkable, Professor Mearsheimer, about unconditional surrender. Chris, cut number 14.
VIDEO CLIP BEGINS:
Marc Caputo: You had talked about you only wanted unconditional surrender, and well, the MOU doesn’t look like unconditional surrender.
President Trump: Well, it really probably is unconditional surrender. It is. I think so.
VIDEO CLIP ENDS
JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO: I mean, is this a rational thinker to say something like those 14 points is even remotely unconditional? So it’s unconditional surrender on our side, not on theirs.
JOHN MEARSHEIMER: That’s what I was going to say. It is unconditional surrender. He wasn’t telling a lie, at least in that clip that I saw. He was admitting that we basically caved on every point.
And as I said to you a few minutes ago, we had no choice here. It’s just very important to understand that there are all sorts of people who are unhappy with the deal. Obviously, the Israelis and their supporters and the super hawks in this country. But the question you want to ask them is, what’s the alternative here? Go back to bombing? Are you serious? That’s not possible. Maintain the status quo? No.
Trump understood that. He understood that if he didn’t shut this down immediately, we would face an economic catastrophe. Those are his words.
Comparing to Versailles: Did Iran Get Everything It Wanted?
JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO: The last American president to sign a major geopolitical agreement— you know where I’m going— in the Palace of Versailles was Woodrow Wilson ending World War I, one of the most catastrophic agreements in modern history because it brought us to World War II and all the horrible things that that spawned. And yet Trump thinks he signed a document that indicates the other side caved to him. Isn’t this essentially what the Iranians sought back in April, Professor Mearsheimer?
JOHN MEARSHEIMER: Yes, I think the Iranians have gotten everything that they wanted. It’s really quite remarkable, but President Trump again had no choice.
You want to remember with regard to Woodrow Wilson and what happened at Versailles, we won World War I. We were on the winning side. It was us, the British, and the French who came out the victors, and it was the Germans who were defeated. This is a fundamentally different situation. The United States entered a war thinking that it was going to win a spectacular victory, and instead it was a spectacular defeat. And President Trump just came to recognize that. I mean, I give him credit for recognizing where we are and doing everything he can now to get out of it.
And you have this really amazing situation where the administration— here we’re talking mainly about Trump and Vice President Vance — are really lowering the boom on the Israelis. They’re playing hardball with the Israelis in ways that I never imagined would be possible, at least in my lifetime. But that just tells you how dangerous the economic situation is, the mere fact that we’re putting such enormous pressure on the Israelis.
And of course, the Israelis don’t have the good sense to understand that at this point, Trump has no choice. And their best strategy is not to push back against Trump, but to go along with Trump and do everything they can to minimize the damage. The idea that they’re going to throw Trump off course and get him to go back to bombing is delusional. He cannot afford to do that. He’s got to make this deal work.
And if the Israelis are an obstacle in Trump’s way, Trump is going to have to push that obstacle aside. He’s going to have to trample on the Israelis as he’s been doing over the past few days. He simply has no choice. He’s boxed himself in here.
U.S. Intel: Israel Will Undermine the Deal
JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO: The Washington Post is reporting, which means the CIA is leaking, that U.S. intel has told President Trump that Israel will undermine the deal. I don’t think that’s news. What’s news is that the intelligence community wants it out there. Do you think the Israelis are blind enough to risk Iran’s wrath? According to Larry Johnson, a battle between just Israel and Iran, Israel wouldn’t last more than 6 or 7 days.
JOHN MEARSHEIMER: I find it hard to believe that the Israelis would be foolish enough to take on the Iranians by themselves. But what I find even more foolish is that they want to continue to fight with Trump, with the White House, and with the United States of America. This is not in Israel’s interest.
Israel, as a result of this war, has done enormous damage to its reputation in the United States and around the world. And furthermore, Israel has put the United States in a position where it really has no choice but to cut a deal with the Iranians that is, in effect, a surrender agreement.
The last thing the Israelis want to do is pick a fight with us now and make it even more difficult for us to operationalize this agreement. It’s just not in their interest. They ought to accept the fact that they helped lead us into a foolish war. It’s gone south very quickly, and now the United States and Israel should work together to do everything they can to minimize the damage...MORE
Prof. John Mearsheimer: Israel Undermining US/Iran Deal (Transcript) – The Singju Post
JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO: …is really rather remarkable, Professor Mearsheimer, about unconditional surrender. Chris, cut number 14.
VIDEO CLIP BEGINS:
Marc Caputo: You had talked about you only wanted unconditional surrender, and well, the MOU doesn’t look like unconditional surrender.
President Trump: Well, it really probably is unconditional surrender. It is. I think so.
VIDEO CLIP ENDS
JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO: I mean, is this a rational thinker to say something like those 14 points is even remotely unconditional? So it’s unconditional surrender on our side, not on theirs.
JOHN MEARSHEIMER: That’s what I was going to say. It is unconditional surrender. He wasn’t telling a lie, at least in that clip that I saw. He was admitting that we basically caved on every point.
And as I said to you a few minutes ago, we had no choice here. It’s just very important to understand that there are all sorts of people who are unhappy with the deal. Obviously, the Israelis and their supporters and the super hawks in this country. But the question you want to ask them is, what’s the alternative here? Go back to bombing? Are you serious? That’s not possible. Maintain the status quo? No.
Trump understood that. He understood that if he didn’t shut this down immediately, we would face an economic catastrophe. Those are his words.
Comparing to Versailles: Did Iran Get Everything It Wanted?
JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO: The last American president to sign a major geopolitical agreement— you know where I’m going— in the Palace of Versailles was Woodrow Wilson ending World War I, one of the most catastrophic agreements in modern history because it brought us to World War II and all the horrible things that that spawned. And yet Trump thinks he signed a document that indicates the other side caved to him. Isn’t this essentially what the Iranians sought back in April, Professor Mearsheimer?
JOHN MEARSHEIMER: Yes, I think the Iranians have gotten everything that they wanted. It’s really quite remarkable, but President Trump again had no choice.
You want to remember with regard to Woodrow Wilson and what happened at Versailles, we won World War I. We were on the winning side. It was us, the British, and the French who came out the victors, and it was the Germans who were defeated. This is a fundamentally different situation. The United States entered a war thinking that it was going to win a spectacular victory, and instead it was a spectacular defeat. And President Trump just came to recognize that. I mean, I give him credit for recognizing where we are and doing everything he can now to get out of it.
And you have this really amazing situation where the administration— here we’re talking mainly about Trump and Vice President Vance — are really lowering the boom on the Israelis. They’re playing hardball with the Israelis in ways that I never imagined would be possible, at least in my lifetime. But that just tells you how dangerous the economic situation is, the mere fact that we’re putting such enormous pressure on the Israelis.
And of course, the Israelis don’t have the good sense to understand that at this point, Trump has no choice. And their best strategy is not to push back against Trump, but to go along with Trump and do everything they can to minimize the damage. The idea that they’re going to throw Trump off course and get him to go back to bombing is delusional. He cannot afford to do that. He’s got to make this deal work.
And if the Israelis are an obstacle in Trump’s way, Trump is going to have to push that obstacle aside. He’s going to have to trample on the Israelis as he’s been doing over the past few days. He simply has no choice. He’s boxed himself in here.
U.S. Intel: Israel Will Undermine the Deal
JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO: The Washington Post is reporting, which means the CIA is leaking, that U.S. intel has told President Trump that Israel will undermine the deal. I don’t think that’s news. What’s news is that the intelligence community wants it out there. Do you think the Israelis are blind enough to risk Iran’s wrath? According to Larry Johnson, a battle between just Israel and Iran, Israel wouldn’t last more than 6 or 7 days.
JOHN MEARSHEIMER: I find it hard to believe that the Israelis would be foolish enough to take on the Iranians by themselves. But what I find even more foolish is that they want to continue to fight with Trump, with the White House, and with the United States of America. This is not in Israel’s interest.
Israel, as a result of this war, has done enormous damage to its reputation in the United States and around the world. And furthermore, Israel has put the United States in a position where it really has no choice but to cut a deal with the Iranians that is, in effect, a surrender agreement.
The last thing the Israelis want to do is pick a fight with us now and make it even more difficult for us to operationalize this agreement. It’s just not in their interest. They ought to accept the fact that they helped lead us into a foolish war. It’s gone south very quickly, and now the United States and Israel should work together to do everything they can to minimize the damage...MORE
Prof. John Mearsheimer: Israel Undermining US/Iran Deal (Transcript) – The Singju Post
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)