ADL’s “Antisemitic Incidents” List Is Deeply Disappointing « Aletho News
According to Jewish mythology, Jews are the most persecuted people on Earth. Rabbis and Jewish historiographers alike speak of unending waves of expulsions, pogroms, and genocides afflicting God’s self-styled chosen people in virtually every part of the world they have lived, and perhaps even a few where they haven’t. As Congressman Randy Fine endlessly repeats, “Jews have been kicked out of every country where we’ve ever lived, and it’s never been our own fault.”
Given their literally unbelievable history of gratuitous persecution, and their claims that horrific anti-Jewish acts are happening with increasing frequency around the world and in the United States, I expected to be stunned and horrified by the Anti-Defamation League’s list of 6,274 antisemitic incidents of 2025. But when I finally summoned up the courage to examine their terrifying list of outrages, I was indeed shocked—not by the horror of thousands of disgusting and depraved crimes against poor innocent Jews, but by the mind-bending banality of the vast majority of alleged “antisemitic incidents.”
What’s more, it seems that the few genuinely serious “incidents” were not even antisemitic. For example, on New Year’s Day of 2025, 17 out of the 18 reported “antisemitic incidents” were nothingburgers—but one was truly horrific: A mentally unstable Black American veteran drove his pickup truck onto a crowded sidewalk in New Orleans, fired shots, and wound up killing fourteen people before being shot dead by police.
But there is no evidence that anti-Jewish prejudice played any role in the crime. The perpetrator never seems to have said anything about Jews. None of the victims were Jewish, but instead were Blacks, Whites, British, Muslim, or Hispanic. The killer “discussed the Islamic State (IS), his divorce and a desire to kill his family in videos he recorded while driving from Texas to New Orleans.” (Note that “Islamic State “is a false flag group of Israeli-American mercenaries posing as radical Muslims, which together with Al-Qaeda currently rules Syria after overthrowing that country’s legitimate government on behalf of Israel and the United States.)
The non-antisemitic truck attack is an anomaly. Almost all the “antisemitic incidents” on the ADL list are trifling, and hundreds if not thousands involve peaceful protests and political organizing.
One of the first “antisemitic incidents” of 2025 happened in America’s unofficial Jewish capital, Manhattan, New York City: “At an anti-Israel rally organized by groups including PAL-Awda, the Palestinian Youth Movement, the Party for Socialism and Liberation and Jewish Voice for Peace, protesters displayed signs with messages that included: ‘Smash Zionism and Imperialism Through Workers Revolution!’ and ‘Zionism is Cancer.’” Ouch! Though not exactly six million dead in gas chambers, protests against Zionism can undoubtedly hurt Jewish feelings. That must be why the ADL categorized this one as “Antisemitic Incident: Harassment.”
Jew-hatred at anti-genocide protests is apparently becoming a real problem. The ADL tells us that the very next day, “At an anti-Israel rally organized by South Jersey for Gaza, a protester held a sign that read: ‘No to Zionist Racism.’” So opposing racism is antisemitic! The next day: “At an anti-Israel rally… protesters chanted, ‘Long Live the Intifada.’” On January 9th, “Protesters associated with MLA Members for Justice in Palestine disrupted a conference, chanting, ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,’ a slogan commonly used to call for an end to the Jewish state.”
Shockingly unshocking “antisemitic incidents” were perpetrated by right-wingers as well as leftists. On January 2, 2025, the ADL tells us, a terrible antisemitic incident occurred in Greensboro, North Carolina: “Approximately eight individuals associated with Patriot Front, a white supremacist group, held a meetup and training event.”
When every left-wing protest or right-wing meetup is categorized as an “antisemitic incident,” it’s easy to see how the ADL could generate a total of over 6,000 such incidents annually. In fact, it’s deeply disappointing that there were not vastly more such “incidents.”
There should have been 60,000 or better yet 600,000 or maybe even six million incidents of anti-Israel protests and meet-ups! After all, American taxpayers have been funding a slow-motion genocide in Palestine since 1948, and an accelerated genocide since 2023. We are paying Israel to blow up apartment blocks full of children and force the few survivors to dig through rubble with their bare hands to recover the dead. We are paying Israel to commit systematic torture, including training dogs to rape prisoners, as The New York Times recently discovered.
In total, we have spent somewhere in the neighborhood of ten trillion dollars on Israel. The vast majority of that sum, roughly eight trillion dollars, has gone for wars against Israel’s enemies, including Trump’s disastrous war on Iran. If people who protest these outrages are “antisemitic,” it is deeply disappointing that there is so little “antisemitism.”...LINK
Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Sunday, May 24, 2026
Judeofascists have made it a crime to criticize Zionist Israel and its kosher, Marxist-Zionist fifth column in the occupied JUSA. (The Anti-Christ has taken possession of the elites and their golem)
Trump’s Sedition Act for Israel, by Paul Craig Roberts - The Unz Review
At all times and places it has been difficult to speak freely. Even the founding fathers had their Sedition Act of 1798 that criminalized statements against the US government. Shortly afterward President Thomas Jefferson got most of it repealed.
President Lincoln during his 1861-1865 invasion of the Confederate States of America had a de facto sedition act. Lincoln used executive orders, military directives, martial law, and the suspension of habeas corpus to shut down free speech. At one time Lincoln had 300 Northern newspaper editors in prison
In 1918, Congress passed a new Sedition Act that applied when the US government was at war. The law prohibited speech and opinion that put the US government and its war effort in a bad light. The bad light was that US President Woodrow Wilson promised Germany no territorial loss and no reparations in exchange for an armistice, and betrayed the promise. The result was the Treaty of Versailles that as British economist John Maynard Keynes correctly predicted led to World War II.
President Trump has declared his own Sedition Act issued not by Congress, increasingly an irrelevant government institution, but by Trump’s personal defense lawyer currently serving as US Attorney General. Trump’s Sedition Act is unique. It protects from criticism not the US government, but a foreign one — Israel. The May 19 press release of the US Department of Justice (sic) says:
“President Trump has made clear that this administration will not tolerate antisemitism, and the Department of justice is committed to implementing that directive.” https://paulcraigroberts.org/acting-attorney-general-conveys-privileges-to-israel-and-trump-family-that-are-denied-to-americans/
Understand that the US Department of Justice is now the protector of Israel, as is the US military and US taxpayers, and antisemitism means any criticism of Israel. For example, Israel’s genocide of Palestine and its people, Israel’s interference in tenure decisions of US universities, the hiring and contracting policies of state governments such as Texas and Florida, Israel’s funding of the primary defeat of US Republican Representative Thomas Massie, Israel’s assassinations of foreign leaders, Israel’s suspected assassination of Charlie Kirk, suspicion that Epstein was a Mossad agent collecting blackmail information against Americans in a position to influence US foreign party in the Middle East, and on and on. Every thought, question, statement of fact that can be interpreted as hostile to Israel has become anti-semitism and will not be tolerated by the US Department of Justice (sic).
Clearly, the Trump regime, essentially a Zionist regime, has no intention of permitting any correct information to be aired. If you challenge or taunt the Regime, you are shut down like Colbert, Thomas Massie, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and so many others...
President Trump’s anti-semitism policy cancels the First Amendment if it is used by Americans for criticism of Israeli government policies, such as the genocide in Palestine.
When the Israel Lobby can cancel the First Amendment, you know that the United States is no longer a sovereign country.
A country at Israel’s beck and call is America today, thanks to Donald Trump. Yet, a significant percentage of Trump’s supporters conflates MAGA with MIGA. American patriotism now requires patriotism to Israel. As the latest mantra goes, “you can’t be an American if you don’t love Israel.” You have to hand it to the Zionists. They have even stolen our patriotism...MORE...
Trump’s Sedition Act for Israel, by Paul Craig Roberts - The Unz Review
At all times and places it has been difficult to speak freely. Even the founding fathers had their Sedition Act of 1798 that criminalized statements against the US government. Shortly afterward President Thomas Jefferson got most of it repealed.
President Lincoln during his 1861-1865 invasion of the Confederate States of America had a de facto sedition act. Lincoln used executive orders, military directives, martial law, and the suspension of habeas corpus to shut down free speech. At one time Lincoln had 300 Northern newspaper editors in prison
In 1918, Congress passed a new Sedition Act that applied when the US government was at war. The law prohibited speech and opinion that put the US government and its war effort in a bad light. The bad light was that US President Woodrow Wilson promised Germany no territorial loss and no reparations in exchange for an armistice, and betrayed the promise. The result was the Treaty of Versailles that as British economist John Maynard Keynes correctly predicted led to World War II.
President Trump has declared his own Sedition Act issued not by Congress, increasingly an irrelevant government institution, but by Trump’s personal defense lawyer currently serving as US Attorney General. Trump’s Sedition Act is unique. It protects from criticism not the US government, but a foreign one — Israel. The May 19 press release of the US Department of Justice (sic) says:
“President Trump has made clear that this administration will not tolerate antisemitism, and the Department of justice is committed to implementing that directive.” https://paulcraigroberts.org/acting-attorney-general-conveys-privileges-to-israel-and-trump-family-that-are-denied-to-americans/
Understand that the US Department of Justice is now the protector of Israel, as is the US military and US taxpayers, and antisemitism means any criticism of Israel. For example, Israel’s genocide of Palestine and its people, Israel’s interference in tenure decisions of US universities, the hiring and contracting policies of state governments such as Texas and Florida, Israel’s funding of the primary defeat of US Republican Representative Thomas Massie, Israel’s assassinations of foreign leaders, Israel’s suspected assassination of Charlie Kirk, suspicion that Epstein was a Mossad agent collecting blackmail information against Americans in a position to influence US foreign party in the Middle East, and on and on. Every thought, question, statement of fact that can be interpreted as hostile to Israel has become anti-semitism and will not be tolerated by the US Department of Justice (sic).
Clearly, the Trump regime, essentially a Zionist regime, has no intention of permitting any correct information to be aired. If you challenge or taunt the Regime, you are shut down like Colbert, Thomas Massie, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and so many others...
President Trump’s anti-semitism policy cancels the First Amendment if it is used by Americans for criticism of Israeli government policies, such as the genocide in Palestine.
When the Israel Lobby can cancel the First Amendment, you know that the United States is no longer a sovereign country.
A country at Israel’s beck and call is America today, thanks to Donald Trump. Yet, a significant percentage of Trump’s supporters conflates MAGA with MIGA. American patriotism now requires patriotism to Israel. As the latest mantra goes, “you can’t be an American if you don’t love Israel.” You have to hand it to the Zionists. They have even stolen our patriotism...MORE...
Trump’s Sedition Act for Israel, by Paul Craig Roberts - The Unz Review
Friday, May 22, 2026
Judeofascist Bolsheviks again persecuting and enslaving Christians in Easter Europe
Russia once again denounces Kiev’s crimes against the Orthodox Church — Strategic Culture
The Ukrainian regime continues intensifying its persecution against the faith traditionally followed by the majority of the local population. In yet another episode exposing the worsening internal crisis in Kiev, a Russian human rights organization recently sent an official letter to UN Secretary-General António Guterres, denouncing what can be described as a systematic campaign of persecution against the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
The document, signed by Ivan Melnikov, vice-president of the International Movement Human Rights Defense Committee, described a series of violations allegedly committed by Ukrainian authorities and radical nationalist groups. According to the complaint, the Kiev regime has been promoting continuous repression against representatives of the Orthodox Church historically linked to the Moscow Patriarchate, while simultaneously favoring the so-called “Orthodox Church of Ukraine”, considered politically aligned with the Ukrainian government.
According to the letter sent to the UN, the process of religious persecution has intensified proportionally to the escalation of the war. In recent years, hundreds of canonical Orthodox churches have been forcibly seized by radical activists and Ukrainian security forces. The purpose of these operations would be to transfer the temples to religious structures considered more loyal to Kiev’s current political project.
The most emblematic case mentioned in the document involves the historic Kiev-Pechersk Lavra, one of the most important spiritual centers of Slavic Orthodoxy and an architectural heritage site of global significance. According to the allegations, the monastic complex has been subjected to a systematic process of expropriation conducted by Ukrainian authorities. More than 220 monks have been deprived of their residences within the monastery, in what is described as a direct violation of international norms protecting human rights and religious freedom.
The letter further states that, on May 12, 2026, employees of the state administration responsible for the Lavra’s architectural reserve allegedly invaded the Church of the Conception of Saint Anna without awaiting a judicial decision, breaking locks and forcibly entering the temple. According to the complainants, the episode symbolizes the deterioration of the rule of law in Ukraine and the growing political instrumentalization of religious institutions.
Another particularly serious point mentioned in the document concerns the alleged forced mobilization of Orthodox monks into the Ukrainian army. According to information presented to the UN, more than twenty religious figures have been compulsorily recruited since the beginning of the year. The complaint even includes reports of torture and physical violence against members of the clergy, presented by Metropolitan Longin of Banchensk during a recent sermon.
According to the report, Ukrainian military representatives allegedly subjected religious figures to extreme psychological pressure and mistreatment in order to force them to sign military mobilization documents. The accusation reinforces the perception that the conflict is no longer limited to the geopolitical sphere and has begun directly affecting civilian and religious sectors considered politically inconvenient for Kiev.
The letter also states that hundreds of Orthodox priests are currently being persecuted, arrested, or investigated by Ukrainian authorities under accusations related to state security. Many of these religious figures, according to the complainants, have no involvement whatsoever in the political disputes between Moscow and Kiev, yet are still treated as suspects solely because of their religious affiliation.
The document maintains that several clergy members remain in pre-trial detention centers under precarious conditions, subjected to prolonged pressure and even torture. The Russian organization argues that such practices openly violate international conventions such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Convention Against Torture, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights itself.
This is not the first time the matter has reached the United Nations. The author of the letter recalls that similar allegations had already been presented during a UN Security Council meeting in May 2023. According to him, however, the situation has only deteriorated since then.
The case reveals a dimension of the Ukrainian conflict that is frequently neglected: the deepening of religious and identity tensions within the country itself. While European governments continue portraying Kiev as an absolute symbol of so-called “Western values,” accusations involving censorship, political persecution, and religious repression continue to multiply.
The offensive against the Canonical Orthodox Church appears to reflect a broader attempt to redefine Ukrainian national identity on radically anti-Russian foundations, even if this implies restricting the fundamental rights of millions of believers. Ukraine should face collective sanctions in the international arena for such actions...LINK
The Ukrainian regime continues intensifying its persecution against the faith traditionally followed by the majority of the local population. In yet another episode exposing the worsening internal crisis in Kiev, a Russian human rights organization recently sent an official letter to UN Secretary-General António Guterres, denouncing what can be described as a systematic campaign of persecution against the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
The document, signed by Ivan Melnikov, vice-president of the International Movement Human Rights Defense Committee, described a series of violations allegedly committed by Ukrainian authorities and radical nationalist groups. According to the complaint, the Kiev regime has been promoting continuous repression against representatives of the Orthodox Church historically linked to the Moscow Patriarchate, while simultaneously favoring the so-called “Orthodox Church of Ukraine”, considered politically aligned with the Ukrainian government.
According to the letter sent to the UN, the process of religious persecution has intensified proportionally to the escalation of the war. In recent years, hundreds of canonical Orthodox churches have been forcibly seized by radical activists and Ukrainian security forces. The purpose of these operations would be to transfer the temples to religious structures considered more loyal to Kiev’s current political project.
The most emblematic case mentioned in the document involves the historic Kiev-Pechersk Lavra, one of the most important spiritual centers of Slavic Orthodoxy and an architectural heritage site of global significance. According to the allegations, the monastic complex has been subjected to a systematic process of expropriation conducted by Ukrainian authorities. More than 220 monks have been deprived of their residences within the monastery, in what is described as a direct violation of international norms protecting human rights and religious freedom.
The letter further states that, on May 12, 2026, employees of the state administration responsible for the Lavra’s architectural reserve allegedly invaded the Church of the Conception of Saint Anna without awaiting a judicial decision, breaking locks and forcibly entering the temple. According to the complainants, the episode symbolizes the deterioration of the rule of law in Ukraine and the growing political instrumentalization of religious institutions.
Another particularly serious point mentioned in the document concerns the alleged forced mobilization of Orthodox monks into the Ukrainian army. According to information presented to the UN, more than twenty religious figures have been compulsorily recruited since the beginning of the year. The complaint even includes reports of torture and physical violence against members of the clergy, presented by Metropolitan Longin of Banchensk during a recent sermon.
According to the report, Ukrainian military representatives allegedly subjected religious figures to extreme psychological pressure and mistreatment in order to force them to sign military mobilization documents. The accusation reinforces the perception that the conflict is no longer limited to the geopolitical sphere and has begun directly affecting civilian and religious sectors considered politically inconvenient for Kiev.
The letter also states that hundreds of Orthodox priests are currently being persecuted, arrested, or investigated by Ukrainian authorities under accusations related to state security. Many of these religious figures, according to the complainants, have no involvement whatsoever in the political disputes between Moscow and Kiev, yet are still treated as suspects solely because of their religious affiliation.
The document maintains that several clergy members remain in pre-trial detention centers under precarious conditions, subjected to prolonged pressure and even torture. The Russian organization argues that such practices openly violate international conventions such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Convention Against Torture, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights itself.
This is not the first time the matter has reached the United Nations. The author of the letter recalls that similar allegations had already been presented during a UN Security Council meeting in May 2023. According to him, however, the situation has only deteriorated since then.
The case reveals a dimension of the Ukrainian conflict that is frequently neglected: the deepening of religious and identity tensions within the country itself. While European governments continue portraying Kiev as an absolute symbol of so-called “Western values,” accusations involving censorship, political persecution, and religious repression continue to multiply.
The offensive against the Canonical Orthodox Church appears to reflect a broader attempt to redefine Ukrainian national identity on radically anti-Russian foundations, even if this implies restricting the fundamental rights of millions of believers. Ukraine should face collective sanctions in the international arena for such actions...LINK
Thursday, May 21, 2026
Wednesday, May 20, 2026
Judeofascists have again overplayed their hand: Now the most high-profile America Firster, Rep. Thomas Massie may use his (Israel lobby bought-and-paid-for) defeat as springboard into national office
Israel Lobby Ousts Thomas Massie From Congress in Most Expensive Primary Race in History
The Israel Lobby, working in tandem with President Trump, on Tuesday night succeeded in unseating Rep. Thomas Massie after dropping at least $15.5 million on the primary race for Kentucky's 4th district.
Some $19 million in ads were run against Massie, according to the NY Times.
Massie got 15 percent higher turnout this election, but the Lobby's hand-picked puppet, Ed Gallrein, soundly defeated him after older voters showed up in force.
Polls released ahead of the election showed a dramatic generational divide, with everyone under age 56 swinging hard for Massie and those over 56 swinging hard for Gallrein.
Gallrein followed in Biden's footsteps by hiding in his basement throughout the primary and letting the Israel Lobby's millions do his campaigning for him.
Fox News also helped prop up Gallrein's campaign by banning Massie from their airwaves for some 14 months and promoting Gallrein with carefully crafted, deceptive propaganda.
Despite this stinging defeat, it's baked in the cake due to demographic shifts that the Israel Lobby's power is on the way out.
This MIGA crap might work in Kentucky's 4th district, but it's not working nationally.
We have Massie to thank for much of that, as he did more than anyone in Congress over his 14 years in office to expose the power of the Israel Lobby.
Trump's approval rating hit a record low of 34 percent recently in no small part because he has used all his political capital to serve Israel.
Massie can run again (hopefully for higher office) in two years and win.
Massie has raised his national profile massively and still has time in Congress to give the Lobby hell...MORE...
Israel Lobby Ousts Thomas Massie From Congress in Most Expensive Primary Race in History
The Israel Lobby, working in tandem with President Trump, on Tuesday night succeeded in unseating Rep. Thomas Massie after dropping at least $15.5 million on the primary race for Kentucky's 4th district.
Some $19 million in ads were run against Massie, according to the NY Times.
Massie got 15 percent higher turnout this election, but the Lobby's hand-picked puppet, Ed Gallrein, soundly defeated him after older voters showed up in force.
Polls released ahead of the election showed a dramatic generational divide, with everyone under age 56 swinging hard for Massie and those over 56 swinging hard for Gallrein.
Gallrein followed in Biden's footsteps by hiding in his basement throughout the primary and letting the Israel Lobby's millions do his campaigning for him.
Fox News also helped prop up Gallrein's campaign by banning Massie from their airwaves for some 14 months and promoting Gallrein with carefully crafted, deceptive propaganda.
Despite this stinging defeat, it's baked in the cake due to demographic shifts that the Israel Lobby's power is on the way out.
This MIGA crap might work in Kentucky's 4th district, but it's not working nationally.
We have Massie to thank for much of that, as he did more than anyone in Congress over his 14 years in office to expose the power of the Israel Lobby.
Trump's approval rating hit a record low of 34 percent recently in no small part because he has used all his political capital to serve Israel.
Massie can run again (hopefully for higher office) in two years and win.
Massie has raised his national profile massively and still has time in Congress to give the Lobby hell...MORE...
Israel Lobby Ousts Thomas Massie From Congress in Most Expensive Primary Race in History
Sunday, May 17, 2026
Thursday, May 14, 2026
Saturday, May 09, 2026
Did Judeofascism (the fusion of Bolshevism/kosher P.C. liberalism with Zionism/kosher Crony Capitalism) win World War 2?
The Hidden History of World War II — And the System It Created, by Mark Keenan - The Unz Review
OpenAI Text Summary
The article "Who Really Won the Twentieth Century?" challenges the traditional narrative of the twentieth century as a straightforward victory for democracy over fascism and communism. While the standard story recounts the defeat of fascism, the collapse of communism, and the establishment of the United Nations, the author argues that this oversimplifies a complex reality. Instead of focusing solely on ideological battles or military victories, the article emphasizes the pivotal role of financial power in shaping the postwar world. It posits that World War II reorganized global systems, leaving nations like America militarized and indebted while enabling new financial structures to dominate international relations.
The author explores the idea that the real victors in the twentieth century were not individual states or ideologies but the systems of international finance and elite networks that transcended national borders. Citing revisionist historians, the article suggests that both capitalism and communism functioned as tools of centralized power rather than opposing forces. This perspective raises critical questions about the nature of the ideological conflicts of the century, suggesting that such struggles were often influenced by underlying economic systems that benefitted a select few while disenfranchising the masses. The text argues that these financial systems have continued to shape conflicts and policies, often at the expense of individual sovereignty and autonomy.
The discussion further delves into the connections between the Bolshevik Revolution and Western financial interests, suggesting that the rise of communism was not solely a grassroots movement but rather supported by elite networks that saw centralized control as advantageous for their economic agendas. It challenges the notion that communism posed a genuine threat to monopoly capitalism, proposing that both systems ultimately led to the concentration of power, albeit through different mechanisms. The article posits that the ideological battles of the past century obscured the more significant role of financial elites in shaping political outcomes, including the rise of totalitarian regimes and the management of postwar societies.
In examining the postwar period, the author highlights the suffering and dispossession experienced by various populations, particularly in Eastern Europe, and critiques the role of institutions like the United Nations as a means of managing global governance rather than promoting true sovereignty. By framing the twentieth century as a time when older forms of sovereignty were dismantled in favor of centralized management systems, the article calls for a reevaluation of historical narratives. Ultimately, it asserts that those who truly "won" were not the common people affected by war but rather the institutions and financial interests that emerged stronger and more influential in the new world order...FULL ARTICLE...
OpenAI Text Summary
The article "Who Really Won the Twentieth Century?" challenges the traditional narrative of the twentieth century as a straightforward victory for democracy over fascism and communism. While the standard story recounts the defeat of fascism, the collapse of communism, and the establishment of the United Nations, the author argues that this oversimplifies a complex reality. Instead of focusing solely on ideological battles or military victories, the article emphasizes the pivotal role of financial power in shaping the postwar world. It posits that World War II reorganized global systems, leaving nations like America militarized and indebted while enabling new financial structures to dominate international relations.
The author explores the idea that the real victors in the twentieth century were not individual states or ideologies but the systems of international finance and elite networks that transcended national borders. Citing revisionist historians, the article suggests that both capitalism and communism functioned as tools of centralized power rather than opposing forces. This perspective raises critical questions about the nature of the ideological conflicts of the century, suggesting that such struggles were often influenced by underlying economic systems that benefitted a select few while disenfranchising the masses. The text argues that these financial systems have continued to shape conflicts and policies, often at the expense of individual sovereignty and autonomy.
The discussion further delves into the connections between the Bolshevik Revolution and Western financial interests, suggesting that the rise of communism was not solely a grassroots movement but rather supported by elite networks that saw centralized control as advantageous for their economic agendas. It challenges the notion that communism posed a genuine threat to monopoly capitalism, proposing that both systems ultimately led to the concentration of power, albeit through different mechanisms. The article posits that the ideological battles of the past century obscured the more significant role of financial elites in shaping political outcomes, including the rise of totalitarian regimes and the management of postwar societies.
In examining the postwar period, the author highlights the suffering and dispossession experienced by various populations, particularly in Eastern Europe, and critiques the role of institutions like the United Nations as a means of managing global governance rather than promoting true sovereignty. By framing the twentieth century as a time when older forms of sovereignty were dismantled in favor of centralized management systems, the article calls for a reevaluation of historical narratives. Ultimately, it asserts that those who truly "won" were not the common people affected by war but rather the institutions and financial interests that emerged stronger and more influential in the new world order...FULL ARTICLE...
Friday, May 08, 2026
Monday, May 04, 2026
Iran war, Made in Israel: The fast talking Jewz sold willing dupe and professional conman Trump another fabulist story of an easily accomplished, Chosen Ones/ZOG conquest of Iran. America and the world are now paying the price
How ‘Israel’s’ Iran regime change plot failed – again « Aletho News
An investigative report by Israeli outlet Ynet has laid bare the embarrassing cataclysm not only of the US-Israeli war on Iran, but the Zionist entity’s effort throughout to end the Islamic Republic via covert and overt military and intelligence operations. Violent Mossad-orchestrated protests, the murder of Leader Sayyed Ali Khamenei, and a Kurdish invasion were intended to produce regime change and “total victory” over Tehran. Yet, as Ynet concludes: “what started as a far-reaching Israeli move, rich in imagination, final in its solution, ends in heartache.”
In granular detail, the investigation tracks how the Zionist entity’s deranged scheme germinated in the minds of Israeli intelligence, military, and political chiefs, before the Trump administration was comprehensively sold on the plot. Along the way, Ynet exposes extraordinary and dangerous levels of delusion and imperial hubris at the highest levels of Tel Aviv and Washington. For example, Benjamin Netanyahu sincerely – and entirely falsely – believed “Israel’s” criminal September 2024 assault of Lebanon, and the June 2025 12-Day War, had decimated Hezbollah and Iran.
This perspective was shared by Mossad, which had been building a vast, dedicated anti-government army in Tehran since 2022. The Zionist entity was delusionally convinced it had the power to collapse the entire Islamic Republic. “Fostering mass protest” and encouraging “armed resistance of minorities” – specifically, Kurds within and without Iran – in “parallel” with assassinating Leader Sayyed Ali Khamenei was part of a three-pronged coup d’etat strategy. Netanyahu believed “total victory” over the Resistance was in grasp in every theatre. Ynet reports:
“Overthrowing the regime was the heart of Israel’s overall war plan.”
The operation was intended to be put into action this June. Yet, in January, with “tens of thousands” of Mossad-directed insurrectionists in the streets of Tehran and other Iranian cities, the Zionist entity believed conditions had sufficiently “ripened” to make a decisive move. Mossad’s “influence organization” was birthed in 2022, reaching “operational maturity two and a half years ago.” Ynet bleakly boasts of the “effort and sophistication” of the Zionist entity’s armed clandestine army of anti-government rioters in Tehran:
“Israel has established its own poison machine. This is a serious weapon system that, if fully operational, can be fatal.”
Mossad pitched its braindead regime change plan directly to the CIA, Pentagon Central Command was informed of it by visiting Zionist Occupation Forces chief of staff Eyal Zamir, while Trump got personally lobbied by Netanyahu. The President – “convinced there were no limits to the capabilities of the military system at his command” after Nicolas Maduro’s January 3rd kidnap – and his administration were a highly receptive audience. Trump indicated his endorsement of the conspiracy on January 13th, publicly informing Iranians “help is on its way.”
A vast US military buildup in West Asia immediately began, while supposed peace talks with Tehran were ongoing. The negotiations were of course a con, intended to lull the Resistance into a false sense of security before the next phase of “Israel’s” intended palace coup commenced. On February 28th, Zionist-American airstrikes rained down on Tehran. “Israel” and the US firmly believed Iran’s leadership had been eliminated or scattered, and the Islamic Republic’s command and control system was “severely beaten.” But then, catastrophe started to erupt...MORE...
How ‘Israel’s’ Iran regime change plot failed – again « Aletho News
An investigative report by Israeli outlet Ynet has laid bare the embarrassing cataclysm not only of the US-Israeli war on Iran, but the Zionist entity’s effort throughout to end the Islamic Republic via covert and overt military and intelligence operations. Violent Mossad-orchestrated protests, the murder of Leader Sayyed Ali Khamenei, and a Kurdish invasion were intended to produce regime change and “total victory” over Tehran. Yet, as Ynet concludes: “what started as a far-reaching Israeli move, rich in imagination, final in its solution, ends in heartache.”
In granular detail, the investigation tracks how the Zionist entity’s deranged scheme germinated in the minds of Israeli intelligence, military, and political chiefs, before the Trump administration was comprehensively sold on the plot. Along the way, Ynet exposes extraordinary and dangerous levels of delusion and imperial hubris at the highest levels of Tel Aviv and Washington. For example, Benjamin Netanyahu sincerely – and entirely falsely – believed “Israel’s” criminal September 2024 assault of Lebanon, and the June 2025 12-Day War, had decimated Hezbollah and Iran.
This perspective was shared by Mossad, which had been building a vast, dedicated anti-government army in Tehran since 2022. The Zionist entity was delusionally convinced it had the power to collapse the entire Islamic Republic. “Fostering mass protest” and encouraging “armed resistance of minorities” – specifically, Kurds within and without Iran – in “parallel” with assassinating Leader Sayyed Ali Khamenei was part of a three-pronged coup d’etat strategy. Netanyahu believed “total victory” over the Resistance was in grasp in every theatre. Ynet reports:
“Overthrowing the regime was the heart of Israel’s overall war plan.”
The operation was intended to be put into action this June. Yet, in January, with “tens of thousands” of Mossad-directed insurrectionists in the streets of Tehran and other Iranian cities, the Zionist entity believed conditions had sufficiently “ripened” to make a decisive move. Mossad’s “influence organization” was birthed in 2022, reaching “operational maturity two and a half years ago.” Ynet bleakly boasts of the “effort and sophistication” of the Zionist entity’s armed clandestine army of anti-government rioters in Tehran:
“Israel has established its own poison machine. This is a serious weapon system that, if fully operational, can be fatal.”
Mossad pitched its braindead regime change plan directly to the CIA, Pentagon Central Command was informed of it by visiting Zionist Occupation Forces chief of staff Eyal Zamir, while Trump got personally lobbied by Netanyahu. The President – “convinced there were no limits to the capabilities of the military system at his command” after Nicolas Maduro’s January 3rd kidnap – and his administration were a highly receptive audience. Trump indicated his endorsement of the conspiracy on January 13th, publicly informing Iranians “help is on its way.”
A vast US military buildup in West Asia immediately began, while supposed peace talks with Tehran were ongoing. The negotiations were of course a con, intended to lull the Resistance into a false sense of security before the next phase of “Israel’s” intended palace coup commenced. On February 28th, Zionist-American airstrikes rained down on Tehran. “Israel” and the US firmly believed Iran’s leadership had been eliminated or scattered, and the Islamic Republic’s command and control system was “severely beaten.” But then, catastrophe started to erupt...MORE...
How ‘Israel’s’ Iran regime change plot failed – again « Aletho News
Jews increasingly and violently lash out at Christians as Judeofascist state comes under scrutiny
Israel’s top Jewish religious body 'refuses to condemn' smashing of Jesus statue | Middle East Eye
Israel’s Chief Rabbinate has declined to condemn the smashing of a statue of Jesus by a soldier in southern Lebanon earlier this month, according to Army Radio.
The report on Thursday said military officials had asked the Rabbinate, the highest Jewish religious authority in Israel, to issue a statement condemning the incident, which drew widespread criticism.
According to the report, the army requested that the Rabbinate denounce the act as contrary to Jewish law, but no such condemnation was issued.
Instead, the Rabbinate reportedly agreed to coordinate with the military and Israel’s propaganda apparatus, known as hasbara, in handling similar incidents in the future.
The Israeli military did not deny the report.
"Given the sensitivity surrounding the harm to a religious symbol, the IDF (Israeli army) considered various options for conveying that this incident does not reflect its values,” the military said.
"Naturally, some of these measures were implemented while others were not," it added.
The incident, which took place in the southern Lebanese village of Debel, sparked international outrage, with religious and political leaders condemning the act.
The Israeli army said it dismissed the soldier who smashed the statue, as well as another who filmed the incident, and sentenced both to 30 days in military prison.
Religious influence in the military
The incident comes amid growing debate within Israel over the increasing influence of religion in the military.
"Secular soldiers came to understand that they have no choice but to live with what enables religious soldiers to serve alongside them," Haaretz columnist Yossi Klein wrote on Wednesday.
“The military is prepared for the lives of secular soldiers to become unbearable in the shared military space,” he added, arguing that “the fusion of militarism and religiosity creates causes to fight for when there are no real objectives”.
"Those who reject this fusion are perceived not only as a heretic, but also as a traitor to the state," Klein added.
Earlier this month, Israel’s High Court ruled that the army must offer female soldiers the option of serving in the Armoured Corps, prompting criticism from some religious leaders.
Ynet reported on Tuesday that heads of yeshivas - traditional Jewish educational institutions - that are affiliated with the settler movement and the military held an emergency meeting to denounce the ruling.
One rabbi said: “I am not against women’s service, but we will not serve where there is gender mixing.”
Among prominent religious figures in the military is Rabbi Avraham Zarbiv, who became a mascot for bulldozing and destroying Palestinian homes during the Gaza genocide.
During Israel's Independence Day ceremony last week, Zarbiv lit a torch as Israeli officials praised his actions.
Before the ceremony, Netanel Shemka, the commander of the Givati Brigade, which is currently destroying homes in southern Lebanon, said that Zarbiv "is speaking in the name of the Givati Brigade"...LINK
Israel’s top Jewish religious body 'refuses to condemn' smashing of Jesus statue | Middle East Eye
Israel’s Chief Rabbinate has declined to condemn the smashing of a statue of Jesus by a soldier in southern Lebanon earlier this month, according to Army Radio.
The report on Thursday said military officials had asked the Rabbinate, the highest Jewish religious authority in Israel, to issue a statement condemning the incident, which drew widespread criticism.
According to the report, the army requested that the Rabbinate denounce the act as contrary to Jewish law, but no such condemnation was issued.
Instead, the Rabbinate reportedly agreed to coordinate with the military and Israel’s propaganda apparatus, known as hasbara, in handling similar incidents in the future.
The Israeli military did not deny the report.
"Given the sensitivity surrounding the harm to a religious symbol, the IDF (Israeli army) considered various options for conveying that this incident does not reflect its values,” the military said.
"Naturally, some of these measures were implemented while others were not," it added.
The incident, which took place in the southern Lebanese village of Debel, sparked international outrage, with religious and political leaders condemning the act.
The Israeli army said it dismissed the soldier who smashed the statue, as well as another who filmed the incident, and sentenced both to 30 days in military prison.
Religious influence in the military
The incident comes amid growing debate within Israel over the increasing influence of religion in the military.
"Secular soldiers came to understand that they have no choice but to live with what enables religious soldiers to serve alongside them," Haaretz columnist Yossi Klein wrote on Wednesday.
“The military is prepared for the lives of secular soldiers to become unbearable in the shared military space,” he added, arguing that “the fusion of militarism and religiosity creates causes to fight for when there are no real objectives”.
"Those who reject this fusion are perceived not only as a heretic, but also as a traitor to the state," Klein added.
Earlier this month, Israel’s High Court ruled that the army must offer female soldiers the option of serving in the Armoured Corps, prompting criticism from some religious leaders.
Ynet reported on Tuesday that heads of yeshivas - traditional Jewish educational institutions - that are affiliated with the settler movement and the military held an emergency meeting to denounce the ruling.
One rabbi said: “I am not against women’s service, but we will not serve where there is gender mixing.”
Among prominent religious figures in the military is Rabbi Avraham Zarbiv, who became a mascot for bulldozing and destroying Palestinian homes during the Gaza genocide.
During Israel's Independence Day ceremony last week, Zarbiv lit a torch as Israeli officials praised his actions.
Before the ceremony, Netanel Shemka, the commander of the Givati Brigade, which is currently destroying homes in southern Lebanon, said that Zarbiv "is speaking in the name of the Givati Brigade"...LINK
Israel’s top Jewish religious body 'refuses to condemn' smashing of Jesus statue | Middle East Eye
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)