Col. Macgregor on Trump and the Iran war: Trump's second term has been openly "Israel First" from the beginning. Nothing is going to change. Netanyahu's in charge. (Trump's as crazy as his jewish mentor, Roy Cohn)

Col Doug Macgregor: US Strategy in Iran NEVER ADMIT DEFEAT...LINK

 

Is insane, pathological liar Trump preparing "a justification for another murderous war" by claiming Iran has agreed to every one of his fantastical terms?

IRAN: MORE WAR SEEMS LIKELY /Professor Marandi...LINK

 

By using the jew-controlled left and the Israel lobby, the Zionist jewz have manipulated demented Trump into a position where nuking Iran is a real possiblity

Forever War for Israel, by Paul Craig Roberts - The Unz Review

President Trump has lost focus, or perhaps I should say he has refocused away from US domestic issues and is focused on how to save his and Netanyahu’s political bacon by extracting them from the war he foolishly let Netanyahu drag America into.

Trump’s biggest problem seems to be Netanyahu’s unwillingness to let Trump out of the war. The fact that it is Netanyahu and not Trump and Vance who makes the decisions raises the question of American sovereignty.

There is no reason whatsoever for the US to be at war with Iran. Iran has done nothing to us, but the war is ruining us and Trump and the Republicans. Energy prices are rising and as the higher prices work through the economy all prices will follow. Markets are uncertain not knowing who or what to believe. First Trump wants to attack Iran for closing the Strait of Hormuz. Now Trump wants to close the Strait himself. Vice President Vance cannot negotiate with Iran without having to telephone Trump and Netanyahu to see what their decisions are. Recent local elections were a disaster for Republicans. By trying to restrict Iranian oil flows, Trump is causing the entire world problems and isolating the United States. The longer the war goes on, the higher the hurt will mount.

Our concern should be why does Netanyahu want the war to go on when both Israel and the US have run out of interceptor missiles and are sitting ducks for Iran. Is it Netanyahu’s plan to mire Trump in a war he cannot win while Iranian missiles destroy Israel, hoping that Trump’s frustration together with pressure from the Israel Lobby will cause Trump to nuke Iran? Nuking Iran is the only way such a large country can be moved out of the way of Greater Israel.

Netanyahu broke up the negotiations by bombing Lebanon, a violation of the terms on which Iran agreed to enter negotiations. Clearly, Netanyahu does not want peace. But the Israeli controlled American media and political system cannot say so. The Trump people will blame Iran, and the Democrats will blame Trump.

It seems we are stuck with a war, the cause of which cannot be acknowledged...LINK

Forever War for Israel, by Paul Craig Roberts - The Unz Review

Larry Johnson: "I think you're going to see an expansion of Chinese and Russian influence throughout the Gulf, and I don't see Iran backing off... Trump's erratic behavior is not going to get better"

Larry Johnson: Trump's Naval Blockade & Ceasefire Collapse...LINK

 

Tucker Calson-Joe Kent interview suggests the jewz are using assassination plots to manipulate and coerce useful idiot/stooge Trump into war with Iran: "There's a good chance that President Trump feels like he is under threat"--former Trump admin counterterrorism official Joe Kent

CARLSON: What kind of pressure does it require to get a president who campaigned against exactly this thing for 10 years [attack Iran], to do exactly this thing? What does it take to do that?

KENT: I wish I knew definitively. I think there's two potentials or two schools of thought. I mean, one is the media echo chamber, the donors, the way the Israelis come in and kind of launder the information like I described previously. And then the other option is much darker. I mean, we still don't know what happened in Butler. We don't know what happened with Charlie Kirk. And by no means am I saying like, you know, the Israelis did this or any of that, but I'm saying there's a lot of unanswered questions there. And there is enough data to at least say that there's a good chance that President Trump feels like he is under threat.

We're not allowed to ask basically was there any linkage between what took place with Asif Merchant [man convicted of plotting to kill Trump], who was recruited by the Iranians to come to America to recruit proxies to kill President Trump. The FBI put a confidential human source at him. All this is public now. This is all out there in the open. And he's arrested and then two days later a sniper takes a shot at President Trump. We think Merchant, and we know the CHS was talking about the human source that the FBI put at Merchant. They were talking about hey we could kill the president potentially with a sniper rifle. But then they arrest him. Two days later, Butler happens and Crooks, according to the official narrative anyways, is an enigma. We don't know anything about him. We can't get into his devices. If we did get into his devices, maybe there's nothing there. No more questions are allowed to be asked about Thomas Crooks.

The DHS IG is currently being blocked from investigating Butler as well. That's out in the media. That's all well-known. Your investigative journalist found that Crooks did indeed have an online persona, online footprint, and he was talking to people. So, it's like, why aren't we investigating this, you know? […] attempted murder of a presidential candidate, and then there's another assassination attempt. There's been multiple public breaches of President Trump's security over the last year.

And then, you know, Charlie Kirk is killed publicly in a very horrific way, and we're not really even allowed to look into that at all and Charlie Kirk was one of President Trump's closest advisers. He also advocated heavily against a war with Iran. He was in the Oval Office in the lead up to the 12-day war.

I wasn't particularly close with Charlie. He was very gracious to me when I was running for Congress, very very supportive. So we knew each other, and the last time I saw Charlie Kirk on this earth was in June in the West Wing in the stairway, and I said hi to him and he looked me in the eye and he said very loudly […] "Joe, stop us from getting into a war with Iran." Very loudly. He walked off and he went into the Oval.

So when one of President Trump's closest advisers who is vocally advocating for us to not go to war with Iran and for us to rethink at least our relationship with the Israelis and then he is suddenly publicly assassinated and we're not allowed to ask any questions about that — it's a data point. It's a data point that we need to look into.

Jewz want Trump as bag-holder: Fork-tongued Juden-fascist snake Mark Levin is urging Trump to use nuclear weapons against Iran—all while insisting he's not.

Mark Levin and Jonathan Pollard Push for Nuking Iran


Fox News host Mark Levin and US-born Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard are both pushing for their respective governments to use nuclear weapons against Iran.

Levin and Pollard are connected through Levin's stepson, David Milstein, who the New York Times revealed in Nov 2025 held a "friendly" secret meeting with Pollard at the US Embassy in Jerusalem together with US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee.

Last Sunday, I highlighted how Levin seemed to be trying to implant in President Trump's brain that he should use nuclear weapons against Iran to avoid high US military casualties:

Is Mark Levin trying to implant in Trump's brain that he should nuke Iran to avoid high US military casualties?

Note how he cites the Battle of Okinawa and says that's "what convinced Truman that we'd lose a million men if we didn't drop the atomic bombs that we did." pic.twitter.com/b6H4wJCSXC— Chris Menahan 🇺🇸 (@infolibnews) April 5, 2026

Tucker Carlson, responding to same clip, made the same point on his show a day later:

Tucker Carlson says Mark Levin is not-so-subtly counseling President Trump to use nuclear weapons against Iran. https://t.co/qTukhIFwSl pic.twitter.com/L7KbYjmBaP— Chris Menahan 🇺🇸 (@infolibnews) April 6, 2026

On his show Saturday, Levin went even further and made it blatantly obvious he is indeed lobbying Trump to use nukes (all while insisting he wasn't, of course).

"[In order to get the Japanese to surrender], we dropped two atomic bombs."

Mark Levin is continuing to urge Trump to use nuclear weapons against Iran—all while insisting he's not.

Levin opened his show tonight by urging Trump not to negotiate a "deal" w/ Iran but a… https://t.co/qTukhIFwSl pic.twitter.com/2sYX47t2E0— Chris Menahan 🇺🇸 (@infolibnews) April 12, 2026
As I wrote on X:

"[In order to get the Japanese to surrender], we dropped two atomic bombs."

Mark Levin is continuing to urge Trump to use nuclear weapons against Iran—all while insisting he's not.

Levin opened his show tonight by urging Trump not to negotiate a "deal" with Iran but a "surrender."

He then had Dr. Brian Cox on to ask him if using nuclear weapons is "legal today under the laws of war."

"I'm taking that as a possible yes," Levin says after Cox (who is a big Israel defender) suggests it may be.

"I think it would be very helpful to go back and read the terms of surrender from the Japanese…because the Japanese were dug in, even after dropping two atomic bombs, and it took a lot of pressure—even after that—to get them to surrender," he says to end the show.Levin does all his shows for an audience of one, and Trump has made clear with his own public proclamations on Truth Social that he is Levin's biggest fan.

🚨🇺🇸 It seems we're in the midst of a GOP civil war... Which side are you on? pic.twitter.com/yhxZIA0jCm— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) April 11, 2026
Trump's threat that "a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again" was clearly meant to imply he may use nukes, and it followed Levin not-so-subtly urging him to do just that.



For his part, Pollard is calling on Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli government to use nuclear weapons against Iran and the Houthis.

US-born Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard—whom Trump let flee the US to "make Aliyah" in Israel—is lobbying for Israel to use nuclear weapons to return Iran to "the Stone Age."

He also says Israel should drop a neutron bomb or atomic bomb on the Houthis during one of their massive… https://t.co/fw5ywfE9Ri pic.twitter.com/GznLlhwUau— Chris Menahan 🇺🇸 (@infolibnews) April 10, 2026...MORE...

Mark Levin and Jonathan Pollard Push for Nuking Iran

Maintaining Petrodollar hegemony is the objective of the American Empire. The Jewz are America's willing executioners enforcing its bloody grip on the Middle East (and trying to build their own Empire)

Jiang Xueqin: The Iran War & the Battle for the Petrodollar...LINK

Have the Anti-Moses, Anti-Christ jewz ("Evil Ones") and their systematically formatted underlings earned the violence that's inevitably coming their way for their crimes against humanity, as ordained by Logos/God?

"Mene Mene Tekel Uparsin", by E. Michael Jones - The Unz Review

OpenAI Text Summary

The text reflects on the significance of Good Friday within the context of Christian history, drawing parallels to other historical events like the Battle of Kosovo and the Alamo. The author contemplates the emotions of the apostles after Christ's crucifixion, suggesting that they were engulfed in despair and fear, pondering the futility of their beliefs in a loving God and the promise of a better future. This moment is contrasted with the Jewish leaders who celebrated Christ's death, implying a smug sense of triumph over what they perceived as a victory. The author uses these historical perspectives to illustrate a broader commentary on power dynamics, suggesting that the truth is often shaped by those in control, as emphasized in the phrase "might makes right."

The narrative then shifts to modern-day events, specifically referencing Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and the geopolitical landscape surrounding Iran. The author draws a connection between historical events and contemporary politics, suggesting that the Jewish community, represented by leaders like Netanyahu, is responsible for provoking conflict, particularly with Iran. This leads to a reflection on how the repercussions of these actions could lead to a significant backlash against Jews in America, particularly if the conflict results in catastrophe. The author emphasizes that such a response could stem from perceived accountability for the war and its consequences, complicating the discourse surrounding Jewish influence in American foreign policy.

The text further delves into the complexities of categorizing Jewish involvement in political matters, particularly how societal perceptions shift depending on the context. The author argues that while positive achievements by Jews, such as winning Nobel prizes, are accepted, any negative association invokes accusations of anti-Semitism. This inconsistency highlights the difficulties in addressing Jewish influence without facing backlash. The author references academic discussions led by figures like John Mearsheimer, who suggest that a failure in the war could lead to increased anti-Semitism, yet critiques their inability to navigate the sensitive topic of Jewish responsibility in political contexts without falling into category mistakes.

Finally, the author presents a prophetic outlook on potential socio-political upheaval in the United States stemming from the consequences of the war with Iran. They suggest that growing anger towards the Jewish community could lead to demands for accountability and reparations, drawing on historical precedents of expropriation related to usury. The text warns against denying the existence of a collective Jewish identity that engages in political actions for its interests, calling for a clear recognition of this reality to avoid random acts of violence against innocents. Ultimately, the author advocates for a reckoning with perceived injustices in American foreign policy, urging a reevaluation of Jewish influence and accountability in shaping national actions...LINK/ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Crooke: Iran's position is very simple, "It's either security for all, or security for no one in the region. It's either prosperity for all, or prosperity for no one." (Trump's JUSA/Zionist, divide and rule 'peace process' isn't going to cut it)

 

EMPOWERING IRAN /Alastair Crooke & Lt Col Daniel Davis...LINK

Led by Juden-fascist Chuck Schumer, top Democrats are actually worse warmongers than Trump, and have goaded him into more belligerence every step of the way

The ‘Opposition Party’ Has Done Nothing to Stop the Iran War and Much to Goad Trump Into Continuing It « Aletho News

The ‘Opposition Party’ Has Done Nothing to Stop the Iran War and Much to Goad Trump Into Continuing It

There is a version of the Democratic Party that exists only in the imagination: the peace party, the anti-war party, the party that marched against the Iraq War and howled at its neocon designers. As Donald Trump (reportedly) accepted Iran’s ceasefire terms this week, some of the most pointed attacks coming his way from Democrats are not about the thousands of civilians killed, the weeks of brutal bombardments against medical centers and universities, or the global economic damage the war has caused. They are about the war ending before the U.S. and Israel finished the job.

And this is not a fringe phenomenon. It is a pattern coming from Democratic senators, the Democratic House Foreign Affairs Committee, ranking members of the Armed Services Committee, and some of the party’s most prominent voices. The liberal opposition party wants more war.

This pattern predates the war. During the 2024 presidential campaign, Kamala Harris called Iran America’s “greatest adversary,” vowed that Iran would never obtain a nuclear weapon under her watch, and argued that Iran’s attacks on Israel would not have happened under her presidency. The Democratic nominee for president was running on a promise to be harder on Iran than Donald Trump.

“What a disaster”

On April 7, 2026, as a ceasefire between the United States and Iran was announced following weeks of devastating U.S.-Israeli bombing campaigns, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) took to X to offer his initial reaction: not relief at the end of the killing, but outrage at the terms Trump had accepted to stop it.

“It appears Trump just agreed to give Iran control of the Strait of Hormuz, a history-changing win for Iran,” Murphy wrote. “The level of incompetence is both stunning and heartbreaking. What on earth is happening?”

And Murphy is not a Democratic Party outlier. The New York Times has called Murphy “one of the future leaders of the party.” The Guardian, the Times, and NBC News have all listed him as a possible 2028 presidential candidate. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has named him one of the party’s “best messengers.” Foreign Policy magazine has called him a “rising Democratic star.”

For Murphy, attempting to end a war against a civilian population that had been brutally bombed for over five weeks was just infuriating.

In a follow-up thread, he wrote: “They will control and toll the Strait for the first time. They keep their nuclear program. They keep their missiles. What a disaster.”

And should anyone point out that at least the killing had stopped, Murphy had an answer ready: “An anti-American regime is in power and emboldened. Iran still has their missiles and nuclear program. That’s ‘good’?”

Murphy is not arguing that the war was unjust, that it violated international law, or that it killed too many innocent women and children, all of which are true and documented. He’s arguing that the ceasefire is a bad deal because it leaves the Iranian government standing with its nuclear program and ballistic missiles intact.

Having a civilian nuclear program is a legal right under Article IV of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, to which Iran is a signatory. But Murphy is treating Iran’s exercise of their international right as an American defeat. And as for their intolerable missiles, most countries have militaries, and every country has the right to them.

Trump, for his part, had no good options left: Iran had closed the Strait of Hormuz, oil prices had spiked globally, and American military objectives had not been achieved. The only path out was accepting terms. Stopping the bombing has already saved lives and protected a civilian population from further devastation. Murphy’s “Democratic rising star” objection is not that the war was wrong but that it ended before the Iranian state was entirely destroyed.

‘TACO’ Trump

Chuck Schumer, the Senate’s top Democrat, had established this line — attacking Trump from the right — months earlier, during nuclear deal negotiations in mid-2025. When Trump was reportedly exploring a diplomatic agreement with Tehran as an alternative to war, Schumer coined an acronym: TACO (Trump Always Chickens Out).

“When it comes to negotiating with the terrorist government of Iran, Trump’s all over the lot,” Schumer said. “One day he sounds tough, the next day he’s backing off. If TACO Trump is already folding, the American public should know about it.”

Schumer was not criticizing Trump for threatening war; he was criticizing him for not following through on those threats, demanding that Trump be tougher on Iran at a moment when most Americans, including supermajorities of his own party, supported a diplomatic nuclear deal. Foreign Policy magazine noted that Schumer’s attack was from a position to Trump’s right, using the language of Iran hawks.

When the ceasefire was finally announced, Schumer held a press conference in New York and went through the deal point by point, explaining why the outcome represented an American failure. “The Strait of Hormuz is in worse shape today, with more Iranian domination of it than it was before the war started,” Schumer said. “Iran still has an ayatollah named Khamenei. The Iranian regime is still standing. Not just standing, but now emboldened. And the regime is likely to be even more radical and more dangerous than it was before.” He called Trump “a military moron” and said the war had made the United States worse off than before it started. The Senate’s top Democrat was not upset that the war happened. He was upset that it hadn’t achieved more.

Venezuela: Trump Didn’t Finish the Job

In January 2026, U.S. special forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in a nighttime raid and flew him to New York to face drug trafficking charges. Within weeks, the Trump administration settled into a working relationship with Maduro’s former vice president, Delcy Rodriguez, now Venezuela’s acting president. Trump, having removed Maduro, chose to work with the Venezuelan regime rather than dismantle it. Rodriguez, previously sanctioned by Trump’s own Treasury Department, was quietly removed from the sanctions list in April 2026.

House Foreign Affairs Committee Democrats posted a screenshot of the New York Times article reporting the sanctions removal and responded:


“Delcy was Maduro’s brutal co-conspirator to steal an election and repress Venezuelans. 3 months later she’s off the US sanctions list, with zero plans for reforms and her regime still harassing and jailing its political opponents. Trump doesn’t care about Venezuela’s democracy, just its oil.”

Democrats on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, the body in Congress responsible for overseeing U.S. foreign policy, were not satisfied. The problem, in their telling, was not that Trump had removed a foreign head of state by military force. It was that Trump had cut a deal with his successor rather than going for full regime change.

The Impeachment Spectacle

In 2019, Democrats launched an impeachment process that would run for months, producing two weeks of nationally televised public hearings, 12 witnesses, and more than 30 hours of testimony, before the full House voted to impeach in December. The central charge was that Trump had frozen $400 million in military aid to Ukraine, weapons intended to be used against Russia, a U.S. adversary. Withholding them was, in the Democratic telling, an impeachable betrayal of American interests. Fast forward to 2026: Trump waged a 40-day bombing campaign against Iran, a U.S. adversary, without congressional authorization, and Democrats introduced not impeachment articles but complaints that he failed to hit Iran hard enough.

When Trump withheld weapons from a U.S. enemy’s enemy, Democrats called it impeachable. When Trump actually bombed a U.S. enemy, Democrats called it inadequate. In both cases, they were pushing Donald Trump in exactly the same direction.

All of it, from Schumer’s TACO attacks to the Democratic Foreign Affairs Committee’s frustration with Delcy Rodriguez to Murphy calling a ceasefire “heartbreaking,” points in the same direction. Not toward restraint, not toward diplomacy, but toward a more complete and more decisive confrontation with American adversaries. Whether that reflects genuine hawkishness, reflexive opposition to anything Trump does, or some complicated mixture of both, the political effect is the same. The liberal opposition party is pushing for more war...LINK

The ‘Opposition Party’ Has Done Nothing to Stop the Iran War and Much to Goad Trump Into Continuing It « Aletho News

Anti-Christ Jewz successfully sabotage Iran peace talks by doing what they've done for 2000+ years: KILL

Iran reimposes blockade of Strait of Hormuz over Lebanon; Araghchi shows proof | Janta Ka Reporter...LINK

Judeofascists continue bombing Lebanon despite ceasefire, making a liar of Pakistani Prime Minister Sharif who claimed "the United States of America, along with their allies, have agreed to an immediate ceasefire everywhere, including Lebanon"

Netanyahu unilaterally declares Lebanon outside of ceasefire deal | Al Mayadeen English

Just a couple of hours after a ceasefire deal was reached, “Israel’s” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced Wednesday that his government supports the US decision to suspend strikes on Iran for two weeks, but immediately breached the agreement by declaring it does not extend to Lebanon.

In a statement posted on the Israeli Prime Minister’s Office X account, Netanyahu said the Israeli regime backs Washington’s efforts to ensure Iran “no longer poses a nuclear, missile and terror threat,” and acknowledged that the United States had communicated its commitment to achieving these goals in upcoming negotiations.

However, buried at the end of the statement was a unilateral carve-out: “The two-week ceasefire does not include Lebanon.”

The Israeli regime has already violated the ceasefire before the ink had dried, targeting an ambulance in southern Lebanon alongside bombing several towns in the South.

Israel bombs ambulance, kills 4

All of the following attacks took place shortly after the ceasefire came into effect.

Israeli forces opened their post-ceasefire assault by targeting an ambulance in the town of al-Qleileh in the Tyre district, South Lebanon, killing four people, per Al Mayadeen’s correspondent.

In the Ras al-Ain area, our correspondent reported that an Israeli airstrike hit another vehicle, wounding a number of people. An Israeli drone also struck a motorcycle in Qana, causing injuries.

The IOF carried out airstrikes across al-Rayhan and Nabatieh al-Fawqa in the South, while Israeli artillery shelled a string of towns across the Bint Jbeil district, like Touline, Jmeijmeh, Baraachit, Majdal Selm, and Shaqra. Meanwhile, the town of Hadatha was attacked twice in the early hours of the morning.

In the Bekaa, an airstrike targeted the town of Yohmor.

Direct contradiction of Pakistani mediator

The declaration stands in direct contradiction to the announcement made by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who brokered the agreement.

Sharif stated that “the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America, along with their allies, have agreed to an immediate ceasefire everywhere, including Lebanon and elsewhere, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY.”

Israeli media outlets, including Ynet and Maariv, had reported that the ceasefire encompassed Lebanon. Israeli Channel 12 further cited a security source confirming that the Iranians “insisted that the ceasefire also includes Lebanon.”

Iran’s demands throughout negotiations had explicitly included an end to aggression on all fronts, Lebanon among them...MORE...

Netanyahu unilaterally declares Lebanon outside of ceasefire deal | Al Mayadeen English

The jewz lost face with the Trump-Iran ceasefire, but continue their confidence man schtick

Israel Botched the Iran War – and Shattered Its Standing in the U.S. - Middle East News

The cease-fire reached before dawn on Wednesday between the United States and Iran has paused the Gulf war for two weeks, after five and a half weeks of fighting.

The results so far are, to put it mildly, far from encouraging.

When the campaign began on February 28, associates of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu outlined three overarching goals to journalists: the fall of the Iranian regime, the destruction of its nuclear program and the elimination of the ballistic missile threat.

So far, none of those goals has been achieved, though it cannot be ruled out that the war will resume in two weeks if the cease-fire collapses. The regime remains in place, no solution has yet been found for the 440 kilograms of enriched uranium, and the missile program remains active, at least in part.

By contrast, Israel's standing in the United States has been significantly damaged, and it is likely to face accusations that it dragged President Donald Trump into an unnecessary war. 

Israel's home front sustained considerable damage, which the military had to expend critical capabilities on a large scale to contain.

In the north, Israel has also entangled itself in a military confrontation with Hezbollah in Lebanon that threatens the security of northern residents and the rehabilitation of the Galilee.

As written here before and during the war, there is no full correlation between superior military capability and a desirable strategic outcome. It is difficult to translate the absolute air superiority of the United States and Israel over Iran and the series of heavy blows inflicted on the Iranians into a decisive outcome. There may yet be a breaking point later on, but for now, it is nowhere in sight.

And as happened earlier in Gaza, Netanyahu's supporters and loyal mouthpieces are again pushing back the timetable time after time, with hollow promises that the solution lies just around the corner...MORE...

Israel Botched the Iran War – and Shattered Its Standing in the U.S. - Middle East News

The evil possession intensifies: Gripped by insanity and bloodlust, the Islamofascist Saudis and UAE have indicated the demonic Judeofascist "tag team" of Israel and JUSA should crush besieged Iran once and for all

Mearsheimer: No signs of quick end to US-Israel war on Iran | The Bottom Line...LINK

While the jewz, per their wicked nature, seek to "destroy as much stuff as possible" in Iran for Israel, demented Zionist Trump is growing increasingly messianic, grandiose and threatening

Trump To Enter Most ‘Destructive Phase’ Of Iran War In Coming Days...LINK

As Iran war fail becomes more and more obvious, "former" Israel First faction of the jewz plays possum, claims to pivot away from neocon warmongering. They lie.

Bob Kagan leads neocons changing their spots over Trump's war

AI SUMMARY

Here’s a clear, concise summary of the main points from the article you’re viewing, keeping the focus on the key arguments and shifts described in the piece.
msn.com

📰 Key Takeaways from the Article

🌐 1. Neoconservatives Are Breaking with Their Past Positions
The article highlights a surprising trend: several prominent neoconservatives—historically strong advocates of U.S. military intervention—are now criticizing Trump’s war with Iran. This marks a notable departure from their long‑held views.
msn.com

🔄 2. Robert Kagan’s Shift
Robert Kagan, once a leading voice for aggressive U.S. involvement abroad, now argues that American intervention in the Middle East has produced blowback rather than security. He even compares Israel to South Vietnam in terms of unreliable alliances—positions that would once have been dismissed as fringe.
msn.com

🗣️ 3. Bill Kristol and David Frum Also Express Doubts
Bill Kristol opposes the Iran war, criticizing the Trump administration’s lack of strategy, though he still supports externally driven democracy in Iran.

David Frum, known for coining “unpatriotic conservatives” during the Iraq War era, now questions how Iranians can determine their own future and doubts the war’s strategic rationale.
msn.com

🎭 4. Why the Change?
The article suggests these shifts may be driven less by ideological evolution and more by political positioning. As “Never Trump” conservatives, these figures may be opposing the war primarily because Trump is leading it.
msn.com

📉 5. Public Opinion and the Israel Factor
U.S. public opinion—especially among younger Americans—has grown more skeptical of Middle East interventions and more critical of Israel during the Gaza and Iran conflicts. Neoconservatives may be adjusting to maintain relevance as the political landscape shifts.
msn.com

⚔️ 6. Not All Neocons Agree
Some neoconservative voices, such as Bret Stephens, Eliot Cohen, and analysts at FDD and the Hudson Institute, continue to support the war. The movement is divided.
msn.com

🧭 7. The Bigger Picture
The article frames these developments as part of a broader realignment: neoconservatives distancing themselves from past interventionist failures and trying to shape the narrative as U.S.–Israel relations face new strains.
msn.com

ORIGINAL ARTICLE LINK

The jewz and their stooges have always wanted the destruction of Iran for a "Jewish Empire". All presidents since Israel's inception have helped them attain this goal. Trump is just the latest and loudest stooge. And it's going to get worse than the Vietnam or Iraq wars for America.

Trump has no good options to resolve the disaster he created in Iran – Mondoweiss

...Benjamin Netanyahu spoke in Trumpian language when he told Newsmax that the goals “are halfway done,” while adding that he didn’t want to “put a timetable on it.”

In reality, Israel’s goal has been the destruction of the Islamic Republic from the start. It was why Netanyahu pressed Trump so hard for this war, as he has with every prior president who were each not stupid enough to buy into it as Trump has.

Netanyahu has been forced to dial back some of the most apocalyptic talk as Trump has, from the start, tried to convince the public that regime change was not the intention and that the war was going to be short and targeted. But he is still adamant about striking the country’s civilian infrastructure, as Israel and the U.S. have done from the start, and now talks of striking Iran until the population “rises up” against the government.

All of this indicates that Netanyahu will not so easily stop attacking Iran just because Trump wants to pull out. While Israel could not keep up anything like the sustained bombing that has hit Iran for the past month, it is still capable of launching missiles from without and carrying out stealthy attacks and assassinations from within.

Moreover, Iran has made it clear that ending the war on Lebanon is part of its conditions for ending the war in the Gulf. With the massive mobilization Israel has undertaken in invading southern Lebanon again, and the fever growing among the Israeli right for expanding Israel’s border to the Litani River and settling southern Lebanon, it is very difficult to see Netanyahu agreeing to leave there, even if he can be convinced to dial back his aggression against Iran.

Of course, Trump can always press Netanyahu hard enough to force him out of Lebanon. He could exert enough pressure to get Israel completely out of Gaza, as Joe Biden could have as well. As in that case, it seems unlikely to happen, despite its obvious political and, more importantly, human importance.

Trump has painted himself into a corner, and there is no clear exit. He ignored the appeals of his Arab friends before the war. He entered this war under the mistaken notion that killing the Supreme Leader in Iran would lead to an uprising that would bring a new government. He did that despite having no way to know what kind of government, if any, would emerge.

Trump has stood idly by making foolish comments while Israel has taken out every Iranian voice of moderation, leaving a government that is now in the hands of the most hardline elements of the IRGC and which is fueled by the notion that Trump has proven them right every time they have urged a more aggressive and uncompromising position.

Trump had no plan to address or mitigate the retaliation that everyone knew would come—the attacks on the Gulf states and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. These were not secrets; Iran had threatened to do these things if they were attacked for years.

It is impossible to overstate the magnitude of this disaster or the foolishness of starting it. While the death toll, we all hope, might be nowhere near as great, this war is already having a greater effect not only regionally but globally than either Iraq or Vietnam.

As each day passes, the magnitude of this catastrophe grows, and the trap Trump set for himself (along with Netanyahu) and walked right into tightens around his throat. And as Trump flails trying to find a way out or waiting for someone to throw him the lifeline he doesn’t deserve, he is only more likely to make even more reckless decisions, costing more lives from all the nations involved...MORE...

Trump has no good options to resolve the disaster he created in Iran – Mondoweiss

What happened to "liberation"? Trump, his generals and the jewz running the show are delusional flakes who have now shown their true faces by threatening to bomb Iran back to the "Stone Age"

Bombing Iran Back Into the Stone Age /Lt Col Daniel Davis & Jim Jatras...LINK

Did Trump just confess to a war crime by bragging about bombing a civilian bridge in Tehran? Lt. Col. Daniel Davis says he probably did

Daniel Davis: Trump's War Speech: Iran Escalation & Death of NATO...LINK

Clueless Tucker Carlson doesn't understand that the jewz want to be an Empire that shall dwell alone; it's how the Synagogue of Satan and its Golden Calf precursor has survived down through history

If You Watch One Video About the Iran Conflict, It Should Be This One...LINK