Judeofascism.com: Israel and Israel-first agents in U.S. have maneuvered Obama into a vice and are squeezing down for war with Iran

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Israel and Israel-first agents in U.S. have maneuvered Obama into a vice and are squeezing down for war with Iran

From:
Lobbying for War
(AntiWar.com) -- by Philip Giraldi --

There has been considerable discussion of the meaning, or lack thereof, of the apparent difference of opinion between the United States and Israel over both the desirability and the possible timing of going to war with Iran. Those Americans who still revere the Constitution and the advice of the Founding Fathers should rightly be appalled that a war is even being considered on behalf of a small client state with which the United States has no treaty obliging such intervention. War with Iran would undoubtedly follow the usual pattern, being authorized by the White House without the constitutionally mandated declaration of war by Congress and likely developing out of an evolving situation in which Israel is being given a free pass to initiate the conflict.

That the United States is in such a parlous condition is directly due to the effective work of Israel’s principal lobby in Washington, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which has just completed its annual convention. Consider what AIPAC and its friends in Congress and the media have accomplished: Understanding that the truth about Iran would not support their case, they have completely skewed the narrative about the threat posed by that country. Iran has no nuclear weapon, has not made a decision to acquire one, and may not even have the technical ability or financial resources to do so even if its government decides to move in that direction. Yet, AIPAC has succeeded in convincing the American public that Iran is already a nuclear power and is somehow a threat to the United States, all despite the fact that Iran, far from being an aggressor, has been on the receiving end of covert operations run by Washington and Tel Aviv that have killed scores of Iranians. President Barack Obama has unhesitatingly endorsed the AIPAC line, emphasizing in his speech to that organization on March 4 that Iran is a security problem for the United States and the entire world, an elaboration straight out of Israel’s playbook that was noted approvingly by no less than Tom Friedman of The New York Times. Friedman asks “whether he [Obama] is the most pro-Israel president in history or just one of the most.”

AIPAC has also been effective in lining up Capitol Hill in its support. One third of Congress attended the AIPAC conference, and a number of individual legislators have been actively promoting the lobby’s line. Sen. Carl Levin is now calling for a military blockade of Iran, a clear act of war. Thirty-two senators, including Lindsey Graham, John McCain, and Joe Lieberman, are supporting legislation that will essentially authorize taking military action against Iran because it has the “capability” to create a nuclear weapon, a line that has already been crossed by Tehran as well as by other states in the region, including Turkey, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia. Why pick on Iran? Because that is what Israel wants (Israel, one might add, has, unlike Iran, attacked a number of its neighbors in recent years). Israel also possesses its own secret nuclear arsenal, giving it a combination of political recklessness and potentially cataclysmic military power that apparently causes no heartburn in Congress...

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who repeatedly and hyperbolically calls Iran a threat to the whole world, has the whip hand in the relationship and he knows it, even if Obama thinks that he might have contrived some wiggle room. Steve Clemons correctly describes it as “the emotional and political leverage that Netanyahu has engineered over Obama.” Ironically, it creates one of those exceedingly rare moments in which one might wish for the return of George W. Bush. Bush, for all his manifest failings, told Israel not to attack Iran, and the Israelis respected or feared him enough to desist.

Or, to make the same point in another way, if Israel attacks Iran next week and Iran retaliates, a virtual certainty, then the United States will inevitably become involved in the conflict, with Congress and the media leading the charge, just as they did against Iraq. On March 9, 86 Republican members of Congress demonstrated how it will work, sending a letter to Obama pledging “unwavering support” for Israel and concluding that the White House must “make our offer of support and assistance to Israel crystal clear if Israel finds it necessary to take action against Iran.” So Israel is empowered to make the decision whether America goes to war or not, at least for those 86 Republicans, who would almost certainly be joined by numerous Democrats. Given that reality, if someone can come up with an alternative scenario in which automatic American involvement does not take place, it has yet to be explained plausibly. Will Obama simply refuse to play? In an election year? Not likely. Many are convinced the war is coming, including White House senior staff.

So what can the rest of us do when the war comes? Very little. The only man who can conceivably stop it, President Obama, is clearly thinking of timing. If the fighting starts too soon and goes sour, which it will, he will lose the presidency. If it happens just before elections, he can pitch in to help brave little Israel and ride to victory as the latest in America’s unforgettable series of wartime presidents. If there is no war at all, Obama wins because he kept the peace. So the timing must be right if there is a war, and this is another thing that the Israelis understand. They and AIPAC can make or break Obama, and the president can do little to derail the process. Will Bibi want to continue with the man he dislikes and distrusts in the White House or will he feel more comfortable with Mitt Romney, a man who has already stuffed his foreign policy team with the same neoconservative Israel-firsters who brought about Iraq and who genuinely do have Netanyahu’s back come hell or high water? Stay tuned...MORE...LINK
---------------------------

Giraldi: "...if someone can come up with an alternative scenario in which automatic American involvement does not take place, it has yet to be explained plausibly."

---------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

If Obama starts a war too soon, he's likely finished as president. Millions of Dem voters will sit on their hands come election day.

If he doesn't start a war, and runs as the "responsible" president who is not going to further bog the U.S. down in the Middle East, and who is going to keep the price of oil at a level that isn't going to destroy the economy, he likely gets re-elected.

The smart play for the Obama admin is to sit tight, stall the Israelis and the Israel-firsters, get re-elected, and then he never has to kowtow to Netanyahu again.

If Obama gets wind that Israel is going to bomb Iran, he should go all out for diplomacy, and portray any Israeli attack as a rogue operation that goes against his administration's diplomatic policy.

If Israel bombs anyway, and is retaliated against, so what? Iran can't do much damage. It knows its hands are tied.

End result: Israel bombs a non-existend nuclear program, is slapped back a bit, and the whole thing fizzles.

The absolute biggest mistake would be to let the Israelis and Israel-firsters draw the U.S. into a big war, which is exactly what they are trying to do. NOT getting getting drawn into a big war by this self-serving clique is the best way to make it irrelevant.

***

The vast majority of the U.S. does not want a war with Iran. I don't think Obama and many Dems want a war with Iran. There are large factions even on the Right who don't want a war with Iran because they know what it will do to the price of oil.

The main people in the U.S. pushing war with Iran are the powerful Israel lobby, neolib-neocon Israel-firsters, their media, and perhaps some factions of the military-industrial complex. (The unthinking evangelical Zionist and Judeophile libera Zionist useful idiot types are just along for the ride.)

Obama is essentially being squeezed by the clever, string-puller sociopaths and their money (most of which was stolen or "earned" unethically via corruption and "legal" racketeering).

Just as with Obama, the absolute dumbest move Iran itself could make would be to let a tiny, scheming cabal (one without the majority of Americans behind it) bait it into a big war.

Under that scenario, no one wins, except maybe the cabal, and probably not even them, ultimately.

No comments:

U.S. Mideast interventionism: Americans dying to secure a Judeofascist realm

"The idea was that America has a war on terror and that the only actual place for coping with it is in the Middle East and that a fundamental change would come through a change in leadership. We had to start somewhere. The objective was to change the face of the Middle East." -- Israeli Meyrav Wurmser, wife of Dick Cheney's Middle East advisor David Wurmser, on how the neocons sold America's corrupt and gullible leaders on the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq.

The Wurmsers, along with other Jewish nationalist Bush administration figures such as Richard Perle and Douglas Feith , wrote a report titled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996. Many of the report's recommendations, including the removal of Saddam Hussein, were later pursued by Bush/Cheney.

In the run-up to the Iraq war, Feith worked with Jewish Zionist Paul Wolfowitz in the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans assembling specious "evidence" against Iraq relating to WMD and ties to 9/11 that turned out to be baseless. Despite Feith and Wolfowitz's checkered pasts of double-dealing for Israel from inside the US government in the 1980's and 90's, they were hand-picked for their Pentagon posts by Dick Cheney.

HEIL ISRAEL! Bruce Ivins' terrorist, Judeo-Christian Zionist stand for Israel

"By blood and faith, Jews are God's chosen, and have no need for 'dialogue' with any Gentile!" -- Bruce Ivins, a Judeo-Christian Zionist dispensationalist, microbiologist, senior biodefense researcher at the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases...and terrorist! The FBI fingered Ivins as one of the biological terrorists whose 2001 false-flag, anthrax-laced letters reading "Death to America... Death to Israel... Allah Great" sent to politicians and media right after the 9/11 attacks killed five people and whipped up pro-war hysteria that laid the groundwork for the "War on Terror." Just like Judas, Ivins committed suicide prior to indictment.

Judeofascists, the core of Zionism

Judeofascists comprise the toxic core of organized Jewry, and oversee the implementation and execution of its misanthropic, Zionist agenda of Jewish supremacism based on millenia-old, vicously genocidal and racist, anti-Gentile, ethno-religious doctrine, dogma and ideology.

With the steady infiltration by oganized Jewry into key institutions of the modern West, Zionism, an international, caste-system ideology that places "chosen" Jewry at the top of the pyramid or 'natural order,' has today been embraced by the most cynical, treasonous and scurrilous Gentiles in the seats of power from left to right.

Unlike the vast majority of Americans, large factions of these corrupted, soul-selling elites have become hell-bent on imposition of Zionism's premise of supreme Judeo moral authority in conjunction with a Globalist agenda. They are using modern statist liberalism to triangulate the Left, and warlike, state capitalist Globalism to triangulate the Right, with both working to serve organized Jewry's Big Government agenda of Zionism and economic totalitarianism.

This cynical, atheism-pushing (except for cohesive, ethno-religous Jewry), hyper-materialistic agenda to economically enslave the human race is what makes Zionist Jewry and its greedy, ambitious, careerist, Gentile cronies, collaborators and partisans, who are busy selling their own descendents into human bondage in exchange for egoistic self-aggrandizement and temporal material luxuries, so dangerous to mankind, and so abhorrent to God and nature.

In order to save America, the West, and even the world from this neo-fascist, Zionist-Globalist, bankster-centered partnership in aggression and greed, with its warmongering, hyper-materialistic agenda of global economic totalitarianism, the traditional Greco-Christian moral order of Western civilization must be restored, and the depraved Zionist elites, one and all, flogged from the temples of Western power forever. -- Chris Moore

Jewish bankers and money-worshiping elites have togther betrayed Western peoples for centuries

A Rothschild family biography mentions a London meeting where an “international banking syndicate” decided to pit the American North against the South as part of a “divide and conquer” strategy. German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck once stated, “The division of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War. These bankers were afraid that the United States…would upset their financial domination over the world. The voice of the Rothschilds prevailed.”

Corrupt Royalists fused with parasitic Jewish bankers, adopted racist "British Zionist" narrative

The Jewish banking families made it a practice to marry their female offspring to spendthrift European aristocrats… The daughter of Jewish banker Ernest Cassel married Lord Louis Montbatten, who was related to Queen Victoria and Prince Philip. If they aren't already Jewish by intermarriage, many European aristocrats consider themselves descendants of Biblical Hebrews. The Hapsburgs are related by marriage to the Merovingians who claim to be descendants of the Tribe of Benjamin. In addition, many aristocrats belong to the "British Israel" Movement that believes the Anglo Saxon races are the lost tribes of Israel…

A founding father of Communism,Zionist Moses Hess sought a war of conquest against “the German race”

Perhaps no one better personifies the axis of leftist thought, Jewish exceptionalism, and a vision of authoritarian imposition of Jewish messianicism than Moses Hess (pictured above), an early Jewish socialist who was a 19th Century precursor to the Jewish Bolsheviks. Hess was a compatriot of, and tremendous influence upon, Karl Marx (pictured below, himself descended from a line of rabbis), and Friedrich Engels.

The ideas of Marx and Engels became the basis of Communism and socialism through The Communist Manifesto and other seminal leftist writings (a basis that remains to this day), making Hess an intellectual pioneer of socialism. Obsessed with “the race struggle” between ethnic nations for predomination, Hess became a Jewish nationalist socialist bent on the eradication of the "German race" and the imposition of Jewish supremacism -- making him a Jewish supremacist intellectual antecedent to Hitler's mirror image, intellectual Aryan supremacism.

The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution and Russia's Early Soviet Regime

Russian-born Jewish writer Sonya Margolina goes so far as to call the Jewish role in supporting the Bolshevik regime the "historic sin of the Jews."28 She points, for example, to the prominent role of Jews as commandants of Soviet Gulag concentration and labor camps, and the role of Jewish Communists in the systematic destruction of Russian churches. Moreover, she goes on, "The Jews of the entire world supported Soviet power, and remained silent in the face of any criticism from the opposition."

"Racism originated in the Torah," and other Zionist confessions on the Jewish question

...For if Jewry is not a race, but rather one splinter tribe or "ethnicity" within a larger "racial" grouping, then what, exactly, defines this tribe?

I maintain that Jewry is and always was defined first and foremost by its own ideological racism, and that Jewry actually invented the concept of "race" itself long ago as a polarizing means to maintain its tribal/national continuity and exclusivity, and to serve its elitist "minority strategy" economic interests, and the economic interests and power ambitions of its priest class in particular.

This is not a novel assessment. Indeed, Jewish religious authorities recently openly declared the Jewish origins of racism when they proclaimed that "Racism originated in the Torah."

Israeli politician proudly outlines the case that Judaism has always been a racist ideology:

"I’m a proud offshoot of a glorious dynasty of “racists” that started with the “Covenant of the Pieces [that God made with Abraham]"..."Since then, racially pure kibbutzim without a single Arab member and an army that protects a certain racial strain have been established, as have political parties that proudly bear racist names such as “Habayit Hayehudi” — “the Jewish home.” Even our racist national anthem ignores the existence of the Arab minority — in other words, the people Ben-Gurion did not manage to expel in the 1948 war.”

New York Jewish banker Jacob Schiff was one of the principal backers of the Bolshevik revolution

Jacob Schiff was head of the New York investment firm Kuhn, Loeb and Co, one of the most influential investment banks of the 19th and 20th centuries. He was one of the principal backers of the 1917 Bolshevik revolution and personally financed Trotsky's trip from New York to Russia. (Paul Warburg, heir of the Warburg banking family and son-in-law of Kuhn, Loeb co-founder Solomon Loeb, played a major role in the 1913 creation of the Federal Reserve banking cartel that monopolizes money-creation with U.S. government license to this day.)

The first state-organized genocides and death camps were not originated by Nazis, but by Bolsheviks

Financed by Jewish bankers such as the Rothschilds and Jacob Schiff, and perpetrated by Soviet Communists well prior to the Nazi gulag, the Holodomor and other “historically necessary” left-wing exterminations like it that killed tens of millions in the early Soviet sphere and later Gulag were principally designed and implemented by Jewish Bolsheviks such as Leon Trotsky, Lazar Kaganovich and Genrikh Yagoda to crush political opposition to the Jewish-Communist coalition. Click on the picture above for a primer on the largely suppressed history of "Stalin's Jews" and "Stalin's Willing Executioners"

"Russia is now asphyxiating the Jews.. slowly but surely grinding out the lives of 6,000,000 Jews."

Jewish Bolshevik mass murder of Christians, opponents and dissidents was fueled by Talmudism

The Bolshevik Jews did appear to sympathize with Talmudism more than with any other religion. Thus in 1905 the Jewish revolutionaries in Kiev boasted that they would turn St. Sophia cathedral into a synagogue. Again, in 1918 they erected a monument to Judas Iscariot in Sviazhsk, and in 1919 - in Tambov! Perhaps the strongest evidence of the continued religiosity of the Bolshevik Jews was the fact that when the Whites re-conquered Perm in 1918 they found many Jewish religious inscriptions in the former Bolshevik headquarters – as well as on the walls of the basement of the Ipatiev House in Yekaterinburg where the Tsar and his family were shot. While officially rejecting the Talmud and all religion in general, the revolutionaries did not reject the unconscious emotional energy of Talmudic Judaism.

President Harry Truman on organized Jewry:

THE JEWISH OLIGARCHY: RUNNING AND RUINING AMERICA

While constituting only <1.7% of the American population Jewish Americans dominate and pepper every important American institution thereby ensuring that Israel and Jewish concerns are of paramount concerns in all domestic and foreign policy. From the Executive Branch, to Congress, to Wall Street banking and financial institutions, from Corporate ownership and leadership of American industry to the media and Hollywood, from Academic Institutions to “think tanks” whose only agenda is Israel’s interests, from advertising and public relations firms to Consultants who package politicians and toilet paper, the “Jewish Oligarchy” is dominant.

Through no fault of their own, Western Civilization is the enemy of Jews, argues Jewish scholar

From Ptolemaic Egypt to early Christianity to the Catholic Middle Ages to the Protestant Reformation to the Enlightenment to fascism to the contemporary anti-Zionist movement, the West is out to get the Jews, claims author David Nirenberg. Commonplace to Gentile-phobic Jewish culture and doctrine, this scholar's work is the kind of Talmudic ax-grinding that epitomizes Jewish enmity toward Western peoples and seeds contempt for their nations. Can Western Civilization really afford "tolerance" for a wealthy, racist and powerful tribe that considers itself entitled to overthrow Western nations and peoples by hook or by crook because it is socially, religiously, culturally and nationally indoctrinated to believe it has been eternally victimized by the West, and refuses to see that it's really a "victim" of its own Gentile-phobic racism?