Thursday, March 08, 2007

Why the Israel lobby and Judeofascism must be forsaken to restore liberalism -- and America

(By Chris Moore, -- Former CIA analysts Bill and Kathleen Christison’s latest exposé of the Israel lobby and the way it works is a fascinating journey through the Judeofascist organizational structure and its timeless ability to adapt, evolve and adjust to opposition and resistance, as well as exert a strong psychological control over Jews who don’t necessarily even subscribe to its insidious program of insinuation and subjugation.

Much of the Christison’s article challenges the intellectual acrobatics carried out by some on the left to maintain the fiction that US Mideast policy is dictated by U.S. imperial interests alone and that the Israel lobby holds little to no sway over its formulation. Even in the face of overwhelming evidence of the Israel lobby’s power (and evidence of its propensity to use that power to push U.S. Mideast interventionism on behalf of Israel) many of those liberals who should be the far-right lobby’s natural opponents are in such deep denial about its nature that they can’t begin to examine the subject objectively. This denial is largely the result of Judeofascism’s psychological control over the minds of many Jewish-American liberals, who are often Israel’s chief apologists on the left and thus end up running interference for its powerful lobby in the U.S. as well.

Opposition to Judeofascsism from the left and from liberals is an important subject because so much of the right has already been co-opted by the Judeofascist movement. “Christian” Zionists, large segments of big business and big oil, the military-industrial complex, and a large portion of the GOP (and more than a few Democrats) are already basically in the Judeofascist camp.

These groups’ tacit agreement with Israel and its lobby is as follows: You spearhead the fight to take America into World War III against Islam under the guise of the “war on terror” and “defending our ally Israel,” and we’ll push (and pay, through campaign contributions) for congressional acquiescence. Together, we’ll all get disgustingly rich in the processes. (Never mind that it will be at the expense of American taxpayers and the lives of countless US soldiers and innocent Muslims, who are expendable to the moneymaking ambitions of the Judeofascists and other ruthless factions of the U.S. elite).

The Christison’s list the arguments of well-known and influential left-leaning writers and academics Noam Chomsky, Norman Finkelstein and Stephen Zunes as epitomizing opposition from the left to the notion that the Israeli lobby tail is wagging the U.S. government dog. None of these writers are uncritical of Israel, but they are more inclined to blame the U.S. government for the actions of the Israelis than the Israelis themselves. On top of that, they cloud the fact that the Israeli government and much of the country’s private industry is deeply intertwined with the U.S. “political-corporate-military complex.”

“These critics do not dispute the existence of a lobby, but they minimize its importance, claiming that rather than leading the U.S. into policies and foreign adventures that stand against true U.S. national interests, as [Israel lobby critics] Mearsheimer and Walt assert, the U.S. is actually the controlling power in the relationship with Israel and carries out a consistent policy, using Israel as its agent where possible,” the Christison’s write.

“The tragedy of the present situation is that it has become impossible to separate Israeli from alleged U.S. interests ­ -- that is, not what should be real U.S. national interests, but the selfish and self-defined ‘national interests’ of the political-corporate-military complex that dominates the Bush administration, Congress, and both major political parties. The specific groups that now dominate the U.S. government are the globalized arms, energy, and financial industries, and the entire military establishments, of the U.S. and of Israel ­-- groups that have quite literally hijacked the government and stripped it of most vestiges of democracy.”

By denying the reality of the Israel lobby’s indispensability to the neo-fascist power structure and pointing the blame for America’s growing corporate-government fascism in other directions, liberal defenders of Israel are dragging red-hearings across the American people’s pursuit of the truth.

But why would the likes of Chomsky, Finkelstein and Zunes want to minimize the Israel lobby’s role in formulating the U.S.’s belligerent and hegemonic Mideast policy? Is it because they are all Jewish, and thus (given their arguments) perhaps Zionists shills? Or is there some other component at play?

I have read a good portion of the work of Chomsky, Finkelstein and Zunes and I don’t believe that any of them are conscious Judeofascists; however, I do believe that Judeofascism holds them under its psychological sway (as it does many other earnest left-leaning Jews).

Because they are from the Leftist tradition, it is clear that each has been indoctrinated into the Left-wing dialectic materialist view of history, which was authored by Judeofascist Communists like Karl Marx, and put into action by Judeofascist Bolsheviks like Leon Trotsky.

It must be remembered that so much of Judeofascism’s reason for existence revolves around the accumulation of money and power on behalf of a Judeofascist ideological core through the enrichment of its most dedicated adherents. The adherents financially maintain the core, the core “advances history” in a way that will materially advance its adherents. This is one way Judeofascism gains and keeps so many devotees among the wealthy.

While people like Marx and Trotsky claimed high-minded motives for wanting to redistribute wealth (supposedly on behalf of the world’s poor), history shows that in action, much of what they wrote and did resulted in the redistribution of wealth into the hands of other Judeofascists.

When Judeofascists are relatively powerless, leading Judeofascists call for the redistribution of wealth into the hands of the poor and oppressed through the state (left-wing doctrine), and systematically go about taking control of the reins of state power; when the Judeofascists are powerful and wealthy (as they are in the United States and Israel today) leading Judeofascists call for even more concentration of wealth into the hands of the powerful and wealthy through the state (right-wing doctrine) and use both the state and private enterprise to exert control over all levels of society. Given their misanthropy, alienation and extremism, if Marx and Trotsky were alive today and living in America or Israel, they would probably both be Neoconservatives and Zionist, the two contemporary incarnations of the Judeofascist ideology.

People like Chomsky, Finkelstein and Zunes are out-of-tune holdovers from Judeofascism’s not-so-distant Left-wing past, and unlike the neocons, still (naively) believe that Marxist economic, political and social doctrine was an earnestly egalitarian attempt to attain justice for the earth’s wretched and poor.

It is their dedication to the concept of justice that suggests to me that they are probably not Judeofascists. However, their insistent clinging to quasi-Marxist doctrine, in conjunction with their refusal to acknowledge the power of the Israel lobby, tells me that they live in a world of denial. They simply refuse to believe that Jewish-instigated movements are capable of great evil -- perhaps even greater evil than that of the worst of the Gentile movements that their Jewish upbringings taught them to so despise.

They ignore the fact that, in the early years of the Soviet Union, Russia’s wealth was indeed transferred through the state -- but not into the hands of the workers, as promised. It stayed in the hands of the state, which was run by disproportionately Jewish Bolsheviks, who, as Communist Party members, enjoyed exorbitant power, pay, perks and privileges. Much of the wealth was consequently used by the state machinery and the Judeofascist Bolsheviks to persecute and murder the Jews’ chief antagonists in Russia, the Christian Orthodox -- some of whom had participated in anti-Jewish pogroms over the course of Russia’s pre-Soviet history.

But the retaliatory anti-Christian initiatives carried out by the Judeofascists under Soviet cover were far worse than any pogrom, and in fact reached the level of state-organized genocide by murdering millions.

This is how Judeofascism paved the way for the Holocaust: it was Soviet state-genocide instigated by Judeofascists against Christians that established the precedent that Hitler later used to justify the attempted genocide of the Jews.

As Toronto Sun Columnist Eric Margolis has noted: “The predominance of Jews among Bolshevik leaders, and the frightful crimes and cruelty inflicted by Stalin's Cheka on Ukraine, the Baltic states and Poland, led the victims of Red Terror to blame the Jewish people for both communism and their suffering. As a direct result, during the subsequent Nazi occupation of Eastern Europe, the region's innocent Jews became the target of ferocious revenge by Ukrainians, Balts and Poles.

“While the world is by now fully aware of the destruction of Europe's Jews by the Nazis, the story of the numerically larger holocaust in Ukraine has been suppressed, or ignored. Ukraine's genocide occurred 8-9 years before Hitler began the Jewish Holocaust, and was committed, unlike Nazi crimes, before the world's gaze. But Stalin's murder of millions was simply denied, or concealed by a left-wing conspiracy of silence that continues to this day. In the strange moral geometry of mass murder, only Nazis are guilty.”

Left-leaning Jews like Chomsky, Finkelstein and Zunes are so dogmatically vested in leftist doctrine that they can’t face up to the fact that: A) Communism was a greed and revenge-driven murderous enterprise revolving around the mass transfer of wealth from the hands of the Christian elite into the hands of the ruthlessly ambitious Judeofascist and secular elite in Russia (they still want to see it as a righteous instrument of political and economic justice); and B) the Israel lobby is an elaborate, disciplined and organized structure in the Bolshevik tradition designed to transfer more U.S. wealth and power through the state into the hands of already wealthy and powerful U.S. and Israeli Judeofascists and their allies.

If the devoted Leftist admits that Communism was a Judeofascist coup from the beginning, it means that he has dedicated his life to carrying water for the ideology of a bunch of greedy and grasping con artists and mass murderers. Worse yet for Jewish leftists, it also means that the seeds of the Holocaust, which shapes how they and nearly every other Jew sees the world, were sown largely by Jews themselves, and the Holocaust probably would never have occurred had the Soviet Judeofascists been cut off at the knees early on. (To his credit, I think Finkelstein senses this; “The Holocaust Industry” and much of his other writing pokes around the edges of the notion that a major component of contemporary organized Judaism -- Holocaust peddling -- is also a con game designed to keep Jews on the organized-Jewry plantation through fear, and Western gentiles on the “Judeo-Christian” plantation through a false sense of guilt.)

But left-wing Jews are not alone in their denial; much of left-liberalism’s refusal to look critically upon the Israel lobby and Jewish ideologues in Israel and the U.S. can be viewed in a similar light.

The unspoken internal calculus goes something like this: Yesterday Jewish ideologues were killing Russian Orthodox Christians in the Soviet Union in partnership with dialectic-material-obsessed, atheistic Left-wing ideologues; today they are killing Muslims, Christians, Arabs and Persians in the Middle East in partnership with materialistic, atheistic, neo-fascists and crazed Christian Zionist Right-wing ideologues. To acknowledge the continuity between the two is to acknowledge that Leftist doctrine (a good portion of it authored by Jewish ideologues) has a lot in common with the Right-wing doctrine it supposedly loathes. Indeed, to acknowledge that Jews (who in the Leftist paradigm supposedly fall into the “historical victims” category) enjoy tremendous power both today (as the Israel lobby) and yesterday (as the Bolsheviks) is to acknowledge the Left’s professed cause célèbre -- attaining power and justice for the powerless -- is merely cover for a power-grab by the power-mad.

It must be far easier for people like Chomsky, Finkelstein, and Zunes to deny, to themselves and everyone else, the horrible truth. Deny the existence of “Jewish Bolshevism.” Deny the power of the Israel lobby. Deny that the Israeli tail is wagging the U.S. government dog.

The problems is, those who identify themselves as liberals and then proceed to deny self-evident reality turn liberalism into a laughingstock, sow cynicism and despair among their own ranks and embolden liberalism’s authoritarian enemies, who can smell intellectual confusion and weakness. Transparently absurd acts of denial in the name of liberalism end up doing the cause of justice more harm than good.

And day by day, as it becomes ever more evident that Judeofascism is indeed the spearhead for the international neo-fascist movement, denying or trying to explain away the power of Zionism and the Israel lobby becomes a futile enterprise anyway. Those who persist merely end up isolating themselves as cranks and suspected double agents.

Jews, liberals and Jewish-liberals need to know: One need not forsake Judaism to restore liberal integrity and esprit de corps; one need only forsake Judeofascism and its Israel lobby.

Chris Moore is publisher of and