Sunday, March 28, 2010

Hypocritical Jewish Zionists who push multiculturalism for US, apartheid and ethnic cleansing for Israel, can't suppress the truth forever

The Netanyahu-Obama Flap
(The Occidental Observer blog) -- By Kevin MacDonald --

Michael Oren, the Israeli Ambassador to the US, says that the US-Israel relationship is at its lowest ebb in 35 years. Well, maybe, but the Israel Lobby is far from dead. Half of Congress turned out at the recent AIPAC convention in Washington, and there were pledges of eternal support by Hilary Clinton, followed up by a host of politicians. In the conflict between the Obama administration and Netanyahu, the media was solidly lined up on the side of a foreign country. Indeed, as Philip Giraldi notes, “The Washington Post led the charge, calling on ‘expert’ analysis of the situation from Elliot Abrams, Danielle Pletka, David Makovsky, Aaron David Miller, Daniel Curter, Martin Indyk, and Charles Krauthammer while excoriating the White House with its own lead editorials.”

Dominating the mainstream media definitely has its advantages.

Meanwhile, more than 3/4 of the House of Representatives signed on to a statement asserting “unbreakable bonds” between the US and Israel and ludicrously asserting that “A strong Israel is an asset to the national security of the United States and brings stability to the Middle East.”...

There is a long history in which Congress is far more susceptible to pressure from the Israel Lobby than the administration. Congress understands that opposition to the lobby means that their opponents will suddenly have a great deal of money donated by Jews who live outside their districts and they will have far less positive media coverage...

The clincher from the House statement is: “Above all, we must remain focused on the threat posed by the Iranian nuclear weapons program to Middle East peace and stability.” And therein lies the rub for AIPAC. For all its influence on Congress, it will be much more difficult to get an angry Obama and his administration fully on board with the Israel Lobby’s project of destroying Iran. The reality of the Lobby’s power even in presidential politics, as indicated by what happened to George H. W. Bush, is doubtless sobering to the Obama administration. But it’s one thing to effectively turn a blind eye to Israeli colonization and apartheid (as, in the end, all US administrations have done). It’s quite another ball of wax to get the US to lead the charge in a confrontation with Iran after 5000 deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan and a $3 trillion price tag just for the war in Iraq — in an era where the federal deficit is already through the roof. Doing the Israel Lobby’s bidding on Iran requires a great deal of pro-active effort in getting international cooperation in the teeth of Israeli intransigence on settlement issues and the spectacle of Israel as an apartheid state for all the world to see.

Indeed, in her speech to APIAC Hilary Clinton pointedly noted that “We cannot escape the impact of mass communications” — perhaps a comment that the reality of Israel’s brutal program of expansion is a very hard sell to the rest of the world, especially in the age of the Internet when there is more and more leakage in Jewish control of the media in the US and elsewhere...

With information about Israel more available than ever, with the costs of doing Israel’s bidding ever more prohibitive, and with Israel getting ever uglier with the passage of time, the job ahead for the Israel Lobby is going to be increasingly difficult. And Israel can’t escape its ugliness. The slow motion ethnic cleansing and land grabbing, the apartheid, the vast open air prisons for 3.8 million Palestinians simply can’t be stopped by any force within Israeli society. And it certainly won’t be stopped by the Jewish Diaspora no matter how much hypocrisy that entails given its commitment to multiculturalism and its opposition to White ethnonational interests. The racialist and religiously fundamentalist right is firmly in charge in Israel, and all the Jewish demographics are on their side. The extremists, as always, will win the day. And that forecasts a very bloody future in the Middle East and beyond...MORE...LINK

Chris Moore comments:

There is certainly an apparent hypocrisy in U.S. Jewish Zionists prescribing multiculturalism for America while simultaneously being the linchpin factor in enabling apartheid and ethnic cleansing in Israel -- that is, until one realizes that organized Jewry is consistently racist in both cases. It’s just that in the U.S., the primary target of their racism is Gentile “whites,” whereas in Israel, the primary target of their racism is Gentile “browns.” In both cases, disenfranchisement of the majority to Jewish advantage is the goal (remember, Arabs were once the majority in Palestine), with the constant “value” being Jewish supremacism, which can easily be traced to their religious documents and cultural ethic.

Doesn’t every culture or religion consider itself to be supreme? Indeed, but only organized Jewry systematically, consciously and methodically goes about subverting and co-opting “host” societies by means of infiltration, subjugation and coercion, as do organized Jewish interests. This modus operandi has been consistent, from the Jewish Zionists back through the white-hating Jewish Bolsheviks (who murdered millions of Christians) all the way back to, say, Esther.

It's also evident today in the Jewish media's racist hostility to the "mostly white" Tea Party movement.

Jewish Zionists might reply that their “survival” is at stake, so it’s all justified. But the problem with this line is that it’s their consistent racism (which, after all, is simply vicious tribalism of which multiculturalism is ancillary) that, over time, jeopardizes their survival to begin with.

No comments: