Sunday, May 23, 2010

Elena Kagan's socialist ideology dovetails nicely with her Jewish supremacism

Elena Kagan on the Jewish radical tradition in American politics
(Occidental Observer Blog) -- by Kevin MacDonald -- has some important material on Elena Kagan. Judicial Watch President Thomas Fitton notes the “most disturbing” parts of her senior thesis at Princeton are the following:
...Through its own internal feuding, then, the SP [Socialist Party] exhausted itself forever and further reduced labor radicalism…to the position of marginality and insignificance from which it has never recovered. The story is a sad but also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialism’s decline, still wish to change America.

…if the history of Local New York shows anything, it is that American radicals cannot afford to become their own worst enemies. In unity lies their only hope.
As Fitton says, “Do we really need a Supreme Court Justice who once lamented the lack of unity on the part of the Socialist Party?”

Judicial Watch had a link to Kagan’s thesis but it doesn’t work as of today. Her senior thesis is consistent with other historical studies in showing that the Socialist Party in New York in the early 20th century was a Jewish phenomenon. She notes that Jews were the backbone of the Socialist Party and that other ethnic groups, such as the Irish and Italians, could not be motivated to join even though they were in a similar economic situation.

Not only were Jews the backbone of the Socialist Party, socialism was very mainstream within the Jewish community. Her account parallels those of other historians who describe the Jewish community from 1890 to 1920 as “one big radical debating society” (see here, p. 71ff).
From [1886] on Jewish districts in New York and elsewhere were famous for their radical voting habits. The Lower East Side repeatedly picked as its congressman Meyer London, the only New York Socialist ever to be elected to Congress. And many Socialists went to the State Assembly in Albany from Jewish districts. In the 1917 mayoralty campaign in New York City, the Socialist and anti-war candidacy of Morris Hillquit was supported by the most authoritative voices of the Jewish Lower East Side: The United Hebrew Trades, the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, and most importantly, the very popular Yiddish Daily Forward. This was the period in which extreme radicals—like Alexander Berkman and Emma Goldman—were giants in the Jewish community, and when almost all the Jewish giants—among them Abraham Cahan, Morris Hillquit, and the young Morris R. Cohen—were radicals. Even Samuel Gompers, when speaking before Jewish audiences, felt it necessary to use radical phrases.
The result was a radical mainstream Jewish culture that persisted in New York and elsewhere into the 1960s and beyond. With the success of the Bolshevik Revolution, many Jews opted out of the Socialist Party, resulting in a Jewish Communist subculture that was also entirely mainstream within the Jewish community.

Kagan’s comments in her thesis suggest a sympathy with this radical Jewish culture — even a desire to carry it to fruition. Everything we know about her indicates that she continues to be immersed in a Jewish culture whose attitudes are well to the left of the American mainstream–a subculture that was hostile to the traditional people and culture of the US and has now become a hostile elite.

This fits well with Kagan’s childhood in New York’s Upper West Side — described by Dan Freedman as “as conservative’s worst nightmare.” During her college years she wrote, “Where I grew up _ on Manhattan’s Upper West Side _ nobody ever admitted to voting for Republicans.”
Elena Kagan and many of this culture’s children emerged from the Upper West Side political cauldron as committed to making the world a better place for all, mindful that everyday people can affect change as teachers, doctors, lawyers _ and, yes, even journalists _ and make government work for the common good.
There is no indication that Kagan has changed her views, and there’s not much doubt that indeed she will be a judicial activist on the left. Fitton quotes from her Oxford thesis:
As men and as participants in American life, judges will have opinions, prejudices, values. Perhaps most important, judges will have goals. And because this is so, judges will often try to mold and steer the law in order to promote certain ethical values and achieve certain social ends. Such activity is not necessarily wrong or invalid.
Well, at least we know what we can expect when Kagan gets on the court...LINK

“judges will often try to mold and steer the law in order to promote certain ethical values and achieve certain social ends.”

Chris Moore comments:

The “ethical value” that Jewry seeks to achieve is Jewish supremacism by way of totalitarian government. The “social ends” Jewry seeks achieve is a transfer of wealth to itself by way of Statist-Corporatism.

The “social justice” facade of socialism has always been a pretext to achieve those ends by drawing Gentile liberals into support for the “socialist” (read Jewish-supremacist) agenda.

It’s no coincidence that the bigger American government has gotten, the more Jewish supremacist it has gotten, to the point where we’re now sacrificing large quantities of American blood and treasure in wars for Israel, and plundering our own economy to keep Wall Street Zionists in the high life.

The main appeal of “liberalism” to Jewry is that is comprised of those who are just plain dumb, easily suckered, easy prey, and with a nihilistic chip on the shoulder. And today it's even managed to draw in right-wing Dispensationalists of a similar stripe.


@ AngryJew [in article comments]: “What I am banging my drum on about is that we are White, and simply because someone is Jewish, they should not be excluded from the movement. In fact there should be Jewish outreach. But its impossible with a priori rejections.”

C’mon. Be hones with yourself. Jews don’t see themselves as whites any more than they see themselves as Christians. Whites and white Christians were the ones who have supposedly been persecuting them for 2,000 years, hence Marxism (largely inspired upon Marx and Engels by Jewish Zionist Moses Hess), hence Jewish Bolshevism, hence Communist mass murder, hence the Holocaust as a pre-emptive strike…but I suppose it could really all be traced back to Jewry’s attempt to exterminate Christianity in the cradle (not only Jesus, but Christianity in its entirety even following Jesus), which is what started the pattern.

@ Mark [in article comments]: "Capitalism is a far more “progressive” system than socialism ever was. I think Fitton and other “conservatives” like him should be much more concerned about Kagan’s Jewish-friendly capitalism than her “really non-existing socialism.”

I agree Capitalism is totally out of control in America, but what we really have is more a system of State Capitalism/Statist Corporatism, where Big Government essentially picks and makes the winners based upon crony connections (the ultimate example being the Fed/Goldman Sachs, but there are thousands of others). This is very different from free market capitalism, in which government seeks to chop down monopolies and keep the money flowing to all corners of society by encouraging small business and “breaking” the insatiably greedy Corporatists, who love nothing more than to whore out their own countrymen for a nickel.

@ Daybreaker [in article comments]: "There’s no common movement of Jews and non-Jewish Whites, other than self-hating Whites following a leftist, White-destructive agenda. I don’t care of that movement is hurt, or rather I hope it is hurt."

Actually, there is a movement along the lines of what AngryJew is pining for; it's called neoconservatism. And although not explicitly white, it has most of the characteristics of what AngryJew is angling for -- which is another good reason not to go down that road. The neocons were/are mostly comprised of Jewish nationalists looking to triangulate "conservatism" for their own Zionist purposes, because they felt the Democrats had become too soft to ever be willing to start wars for Israel (as opposed to merely enforcing the status-quo of the outcome of wars that the Right already completed, ie Clinton enforcing the sanctions against Iraq). And their plan worked masterfully, as Bush II’s invasion of Iraq (largely instigated by the Israel lobby and the neocons) makes clear.

Why do I suspect that AngryJew and his ilk are attempting to play a similar game? If Jews were ever to be allowed into the white consciousness movement, I can almost guarantee that in less than a generation, the whites would be fighting yet another war for Israel, and the “white” Jews would be laughing all the way to the bank.

No comments: