Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Obama's win-win with Kagan: advance the authoritarian, Jewish supremacist "multicultural" agenda, appease the racist Jewish Zionists [updated]

Elena Kagan Gets the Nomination
(Occidental Observer Blog) --

It’s great to be Jewish in the year 2010. The latest evidence is the appointment of Elena Kagan as the third Jew on the Supreme Court. Philip Weiss puts it this way:
The Kagan appointment means that we have entered a period in which Jews are equal members, if not actually predominant members, of the American Establishment. Obama’s two closest political advisers are Jewish, Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod, and are said to be his foreign-policy braintrust. The economy is supervised to a large degree by Jewish appointees, Larry Summers and Fed Reserve Board chair Paul Bernanke (Time’s man of the year last year, a selection overseen by Rick Stengel, the Time magazine editor, who is also Jewish).
Of course, that’s just scratching the surface on Jewish representation among the elites in politics, law, the financial world, the media, and personal wealth. Weiss goes on to take the standard line that Jews have achieved so much because of their bookish culture. But if there’s anything that stands out about Kagan, it’s how utterly ordinary she is in terms of scholarly accomplishment or anything else that would qualify her for the court–very few publications, no experience as a judge, little courtroom experience – the Harriet Meyers of the Obama administration. (I stole that one from someone on the Rachel Maddow show, maybe Maddow herself. But it shows the depth of her inaptitude that even liberals are sensitive to it. For example, Paul Campos writes on the Daily Beast, “if Kagan is a brilliant legal scholar, the evidence must be lurking somewhere other than in her publications. Kagan’s scholarly writings are lifeless, dull, and eminently forgettable. They are, on the whole, cautious academic exercises in the sort of banal on-the-other-handing whose prime virtue is that it’s unlikely to offend anyone in a position of power.” Here’s my version: “When she received tenure at the University of Chicago in 1995, she had exactly two scholarly articles published in law journals — a record that would ordinarily not get her tenure even at quite a few third tier universities much less an elite institution like the University of Chicago.”)

Her only talent seems to be getting really prestigious jobs without any obvious qualifications apart from her ethnic background. And her appointment is a sure thing for the left: Whereas Republicans have been disappointed several times by nominees who converted into liberals (like John Paul Stevens), Kagan’s ethnic identity ensures that she is on the side of all things multicultural.

My take (see also here) is that this is an affirmative action appointment of someone who has benefited greatly from Jewish ethnic networking and has dangerous views on the First Amendment that are in line with the views of the ADL, the SPLC, and the rest of the organized Jewish community. (See also Patrick Cleburne’s post at VDARE.com.)

It’s amazing to see liberals expressing doubts about Kagan. She is clearly on the left, perhaps with some neocon tendencies regarding executive power. But that is hardly reassuring. Put these tendencies together and you have someone who could be very dangerous to an incipient racialist movement: Anti-”hate speech” and comfortable with using government power to suppress political action that conflicts with the aims of the regime.

Another thought that crossed my mind was that Obama and his advisers may have wanted to court Jews [bad pun] because of the fallout from the tensions with Israel. Despite the fact that, as John Mearsheimer recently noted, the confrontation with Israel was won hands down by Israel, a recent poll shows that American Jews are defecting from Obama in droves, with only 42% saying they would now vote for Obama (down from 83% who voted for him in 2008). A recent visit to the White House (”Obama Tries to Mend Fences with Jews“, NYTimes, May 4, 2010) by Elie Wiesel indicated shows that Obama sees a need to placate the Jewish community...MORE...LINK

Chris Moore comments:

The Jewish supremacy on the Statist Left has become so blatant, a child should be able to see it. Not only has it provided institutionally racist Israel a blank check to rape, plunder and murder the Palestinians for decades, and dutifully supported the American wars for Israel in the Middle East, no questions asked, but now it's not even bothering to go through the pretense of considering non-Jews for the most powerful, enduring and influential posts in government, but just blatantly inserting even the most unqualified of them to the top positions in the land, willy-nilly.

We really are resembling the early Bolshevik Soviet Union more and more every day. And as MacDonald points out, since no doubt Kagan will be a strong advocate of anti-"hate speech" laws "and comfortable with using government power to suppress political action that conflicts with the aims of the regime," it's painfully clear that she's just another Jewish Bolshevik/Zionist.

To assert that Obama is a Muslim or even a Christian has gone beyond the realm of farce to the point of absurdity. Like so many of these hyper-materialistic, hyper-ambitious post-modern goy elites within left-liberalism (and on the neocon/Bushcon Right), the man is nothing so much as a useful idiot for the Jewish supremacist agenda. You could practically call being a Shabbat goy for the Jews his religion.

There you go. Under the heading "religion," gentile Bushcons, neocons and left-liberal Obamunists should by rights all be jotting down the entry "Shabbat Goy."

Or is that actually a caste?


Angry Jew [in comments]: “if you want to keep on pushing Jews out, then what do you expect? I am a White Jew, and yet I am not welcome by either you, and by many many liberal Jews.”

Are you a Jewish supremacist? If so, you ARE indeed accepted by most “liberal” Jews, most of whom themselves are Jewish supremacist (albeit some slightly more attracted to the Bolshevik vein of Jewish supremacy than the Zionist vein).

Jewish collectivism is Jewish collectivism. It may hop back and forth between the Zionist (Right) and Bolshevik (Left) foot, but at their core, their center of gravity, Jewish collectivists are Jewish supremacists. The only variation is the means by which they assert their Jewish supremacy.

If Jewish collectivism advocated libertarian politics, as did America’s Protestant founders, that would be one thing. But it seems allergic to libertarianism, likely because of its authoritarian, control-freak religious and social culture, and its culture of greed.

This attempted claim that Jewish collectivists, whether Right or Left, don’t always ultimately circle the wagons around the self-serving Jewish supremacist cause is a canard, and an attempt at misdirection.

This is why, for example, Jews across the political spectrum have come out in favor of the totalitarian socialist Jew Kagan, whose own politics are simply a variation of Jewish neoconservatism.

This is why, for example, “conservative” Zionist Jew Netanyahu is building a shrine to the Bolshevik Red Army in Israel.
I might add, one doesn’t have to be Jewish to be a Jewish supremacist. Marxist Judeophile “liberals” and “Christian” Dispensationalist Zionists also believe that Jews are specially “chosen” or historically ordained for some special mission unto the dumb “nations”, and thus these are ready, willing, able and eager to betray their own people and countries on behalf of the cause of Jewish supremacy.

Treason runs deep in ALL Jewish supremacists.

No comments: