From crypto-Zionist left-Bolshevism and right-Neoconservatism in the Diaspora, through naked Jewish national socialism in Israel, Judeo supremacist (Zionist) movements have murdered and terrorized millions in pursuit of a messianic, "Chosen Race" agenda. They will continue to kill until the Judeofascists and their agents, allies and accomplices are identified, exposed and brought to justice.
(AP) - The FBI and the U.S. Labor Department are investigating prominent labor leader Andy Stern in their probe of corruption at the Service Employees International Union, according to two people who have been interviewed by federal agents.
The two organized labor officials met with federal agents this summer to answer questions about a six-figure book contract that Stern landed in 2006 and his role in approving money to pay the salary of an SEIU leader in California who allegedly performed no work.
Both officials spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the investigation. The FBI and the Labor Department's office of inspector general declined to comment for the record.
The disclosure about the federal inquiry of Stern - who abruptly resigned as president of the 2.2-million member SEIU in April - comes just weeks ahead of contentious congressional elections in which the union is spending an estimated $44 million to support its favored Democratic candidates.
The SEIU has been plagued with several financial scandals since 2008, when the Los Angeles Times reported that Tyrone Freeman, head of the union's largest California local, misappropriated hundreds of thousands of dollars from the union. The union ousted Freeman and demanded that he return the money. No federal charges have been filed against him, but SEIU spokeswoman Michelle Ringuette said the union has been cooperating with the FBI.
Stern left his post two years before the end of his term, saying he wanted to focus more on his personal life. He remains a member of President Barack Obama's deficit commission and a highly influential figure in the White House, where he was one of the most frequent visitors last year. He is also a research fellow at Georgetown University and a paid consultant for the SEIU...
One person who spoke to federal agents twice, in May and June, said they asked about a 2006 contract in which Stern received a $175,000 advance from Simon & Schuster to write the book "A Country That Works." The SEIU and its locals bought thousands of copies of the book after it was published. The union also paid thousands to fact-check and promote the book, but Stern pocketed the advance...MORE...LINK ------------------------- Jewish egomaniac who decried union leadership as too "male, pale and stale," and engineered a self-serving union schism , Andy Stern, (left) pictured with racist, Zionist AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka (center) and professional shakedown artist Jesse Jackson (right). Simon and Schuster is controlled by MTV smut-peddler Viacom/CBS, which in turn are controlled by Big Media Jew Sumner Redstone.
Netanyahu and Peres praise former Cuban dictator’s recent comments slamming Ahmadinejad and defending Israel.
Former Cuban dictator Fidel Castro’s surprising words of support for Israel’s right to exist and empathy with the tragedies of Jewish history elicited warm words from Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and a letter of thanks from President Shimon Peres over the weekend.
Castro, in a recent interview with The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg, said Israel “without a doubt” has the right to exist, and criticized Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for his Holocaust denial, saying Iran should understand the consequences of theological anti-Semitism.
“I don’t think anyone has been slandered more than the Jews,” Castro said. “I would say much more than the Muslims. They have been slandered much more than the Muslims because they are blamed and slandered for everything. No one blames the Muslims for anything.”
On Wednesday, Goldberg wrote on his blog that Castro said he understands how such Jewish suffering could inform the decision-making of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.
“Now, let’s imagine that I were Netanyahu,” Castro said, “that I were there and I sat down to reason through [the issues facing Israel], I would remember that six million Jewish men and women, of all ages were exterminated in the concentration camps.”
According to Goldberg, Castro also expressed great admiration for Netanyahu’s father, Ben-Zion, the world's foremost historian of the Spanish Inquisition, and said he was impressed “by his character, his knowledge and his history.”
Netanyahu’s office sent out a statement Saturday saying Castro’s words “demonstrate his deep understanding of the history of the Jewish people and Israel.”
The Prime Minister’s Office also sent out links to Goldberg’s blog related to the Castro interview. A source in the Prime Minister’s Office explained that Castro’s words were being highlighted because the former Cuban president is an icon to the world’s radical-left which is trying to de-legitimize Israel and say it has no right to exist. Castro’s comments about Israel’s fundamental legitimacy are therefore not without significance, he said...MORE...LINK -------------------------
The alert but not particularly conservative Politico webzine has an interesting item “Right sees law group tilting left” by Josh Gerstein (9/25/10):
The American Bar Association, which was dogged for decades by criticism over a perceived liberal bent, is risking reigniting that debate by taking bold stands on a pair of hot-button social issues.
At its annual meeting last month in San Francisco, the nation’s largest lawyers’ group passed a formal resolution, urging every state in the union to permit same-sex marriages.
In June, the ABA took what it acknowledged was an “extraordinary action” by filing a brief urging a federal judge in Arizona to block enforcement of that state’s highly controversial law intended to crack down on illegal immigration
What is going on? Apparently what is going on is that the ABA’s new president is Stephen Zack of Miami, of whom Politico says that he
defended the group’s support for same-sex marriage and its opposition to the Arizona immigration law as part of the organization’s broad duty to defend civil rights…
The fact that the public is sharply divided on the gay marriage issue and appears to broadly support the Arizona immigration law isn’t relevant to whether the bar group should speak out on those issues, Zack insisted. “If that was the touchstone then in the 50s, we should not have taken a stand opposing segregation,” Zack said.
Evidently it is a personal matter:
Zack said his background has made him acutely aware of the danger of depriving people of their rights. “I came from Cuba in 1961. I’m the first Hispanic-American president of the American Bar Association,” he said. “I keep that experience very close to me. To me, the loss of liberty is not a theoretical exercise. It actually happened.”
Another of those socially conservative Hispanics? Well, not quite.
The preface to an article by Zack on Latina Lista (Guest Voz: First Latino President-elect of American Bar Association speaks out about civic education [November 20, 2009]) says
Mr. Zack will be the first president in the ABA’s 131-year history who happens to be both Latino and Jewish.
And Zack himself says
In the early 1900s my grandfather had come to Cuba from Russia, looking for a better life, searching for freedom, hoping for the right to practice his religion and beliefs without persecution. For many years, he found that. He raised a family, worked hard and prospered. Unfortunately, there came a time when that changed for my family in Cuba.
When I was 13, we left Cuba to come to the United States. My grandfather became a refugee for the second time, once again having to flee his home in search of that better life…
Far from being Hispanic — his family spent apparently less than 60 years in Cuba –- Stephen Zack is yet another descendant of Russian Jews working off ancestral animosities against mythical Cossacks by wrecking the societies which so unwisely gave them shelter and hospitality...MORE...LINK ------------------------- -------------------------
Chris Moore comments:
This story is so rich with irony, I hardly know where to begin.
Here we have a “Hispanic” shyster lawyer leader trying to drag the shyster-lawyer ABA swindlers even further left inside the liberal camp where they have historically played their grift by claiming it’s a “civil rights” imperative.
Then it turns out the Hispanic shyster leader isn’t really Hispanic at all, but a White Jew trying to pass himself off as a person of color in order to gain left-liberal multi-cultural cred (not unlike another opportunistic Jew trying to swindle the Latinos as a fellow ese by the name of Geraldo Rivera).
This fake-Hispanic, crypto-Jew shyster justifies his lurch left by claiming the idea is to preserve freedom (“To me, the loss of liberty is not a theoretical exercise. It actually happened”) in reference to his family’s loss of wealth to the left-wing Cuban revolutionaries, and subsequent flight to America.
But once in America, suddenly left-wing politics are no longer about "loss of liberty," but all about "civil rights."
This guy epitomizes the classic Jewish Zionist neoliberal scam around which the entire modern Democrat Party (and neocon wing of the GOP) has been built.
Is there a waking moment in the lives of these counterfeit human beings when they’re not going round and round in their minds the different possible ways they can swindle, subjugate, rob, murder, defraud or disenfranchise some group or some individual “mark,” and get away with it scot-free?
WASHINGTON - After months of denial, leaders of the pro-Israel organization J-Street have been compelled to admit their activities are partly funded by Jewish billionaire George Soros who, in his own words, refuses to be part of activities in support of Israel...
Soros has been strongly critical of the US and Israel. In Jewish circles in America he is considered a controversial figure, especially since his interview with the New Yorker 15 years ago, in which he stated he did not want to be part of any activity in support of Israel, even if he did not deny Jews' right to have their own state.
Keeping his connections with J-Street a secret worked in his interest, because J-Street has repeatedly declared itself to be pro-Israel and pro-peace. On its website the organization denies that Soros is its main funder, stating that Soros did not found J-Street and that he has publicly stated his wish to avoid being involved as such involvement may work against the organization.
However, on Friday the Washington Times revealed that Soros and his children donated $245,000 when J-Street was founded, and later contributed a further half million dollars. This report plus others that appeared in its wake compelled J-Street's President Jeremy Ben-Ami to confirm that Soros was among those funding the organization...MORE...LINK
WASHINGTON -- Four Democrats in Congress urged US President Barack Obama to release Jonathan Pollard as a means of advancing the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.
A letter circulating among other members of the US House of Representatives and initiated by Reps. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), Edolphus Towns (D-N.Y.), Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) and Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.) "notes the positive impact that a grant of clemency would have in Israel, as a strong indication of the goodwill of our nation towards Israel and the Israeli people," said a statement issued Thursday by Frank's office. "This would be particularly helpful at a time when the Israeli nation faces difficult decisions in its long-standing effort to secure peace with its neighbors."...
US intelligence officials have said Pollard's espionage was too vast to merit clemency, and that he should not be released before 2015, when his life sentence is first subject to review under sentencing guidelines in place at the time of his conviction.
Frank's statement said the letter would not challenge Pollard's guilt, but would argue that his life sentence is not commensurate with those handed down to spies who have committed similar offenses.
From: Free Pollard Now, Pay Later Declassified FBI file reveals cost of ignoring Israeli espionage (AntiWar.com) -- by Grant Smith --
The proposal to free spy Jonathan Pollard in exchange for Israel extending a temporary freeze on settlement building has now received support from four Democrats in Congress. Although many claim Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu initiated this latest bid to free Pollard, it may not be that simple. Since the 1990s the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations has publicly and privately called for Pollard’s release. The 52 organizations in the Conference constitute a key block in the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s (AIPAC) executive committee. Hitching Pollard’s release to any suitably strong vehicle – whether steaming in from Israel or propelled from within the U.S. – is therefore an AIPAC priority. Like its behind-the-scenes support for Israel’s clandestine nuclear weapons program, Pollard’s release is not something AIPAC can lobby for openly. This is because – as with many of AIPAC’s initiatives – freeing Pollard is both unpopular and a zero-sum game in which America must lose in order for Israel to win.
The logic behind exonerating one massive illegality to temporarily stanch another seems to be that in exercising clemency the U.S. will win time to advance the so-called “peace process” underway between Israelis and Palestinians. But will freeing Pollard instead only touch off yet another crippling wave of Israeli espionage against the United States? Has exercising leniency toward the many instances of Israel-related espionage ever worked in the past? Over 400 pages of FBI news clippings [.pdf] released on Sept. 7, 2010, in response to a 2009 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for files about the 2005 AIPAC espionage investigation reveal one inescapable reality: now that the “free Pollard” initiative is underway, American governance will likely suffer greatly whether or not President Obama ultimately chooses to reward yet another crime committed in the name of Israel...
The newly released FBI clipping file also includes an Oct. 20, 2006, Time article detailing a federal investigation into whether Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) – in exchange for help from AIPAC to obtain leadership of the House Intelligence Panel – agreed to intervene with the Bush administration to convince it to go easy on AIPAC’s Weissman and Rosen. Again prosecutorial leniency prevailed, and nothing came of the Harman investigation. By 2009 reporter Jeff Stein revealed that Harman had been overheard on a 2005 federal wiretap telling a suspected Israeli agent that she would lobby the Justice Department to reduce espionage-related charges against the indicted pair.
A fascinating read, the FBI’s news-clipping file provides a timely snapshot of how Israel-related espionage cases undermine the rule of law and poison governance in America. In case after case, solid evidence gathered by law enforcement, independent investigative reporting, and criminal indictments gave way to elaborate PR campaigns alleging anti-Semitism and demanding DOJ and judicial leniency under various outrageous pretexts. Rosen and Weismann’s prospects were buoyed by the oft-repeated slogan that in soliciting and distributing closely held U.S. national defense information, the pair were only “doing what reporters do every day,” a deeply flawed slippery-slope analogy. Firefighters light small fires to rob advancing blazes of fuel – just as arsonists also sometimes set things alight...It is clear from the news clippings that AIPAC’s goal – as exercised though Rosen and Weissman – was gathering enough kindling to set ablaze U.S. military strikes against Israel’s arch-nemesis Iran, securing inside information on the president’s policy options and other fuel it could use to incite the media and public before George W. Bush left office. While it is touching that the FBI was at the time thumbing through Mother Jones articles lamenting that the forces behind the launching of one disastrous war on false pretexts in the Middle East were jockeying for yet another, the totality of the FBI file documents the collapse of the rule of law through DOJ intransigence. The DOJ should have indicted AIPAC for espionage in 2005 – which probably would have led to its demise – rather than gingerly pursuing two AIPAC operatives (one is now suing AIPAC for “defamation”). Instead, a DOJ back-room deal permitted AIPAC to walk, culminating in the current bid to free one of the most notorious spies ever caught on American soil and a renewed drive to hit Iran through any means. The DOJ has, over time, proven to be a moribund destination where Israeli espionage cases go to be ignored, neglected [.pdf], or pardoned...MORE...LINK
Jim Russell, who is the Republican candidate for New York’s 18th Congressional District, is busy combating accusations about his association with The Occidental Quarterly. MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow’s take is a classic example of the power of the media to create an alternate reality where facts don’t matter and where simply stating Russell’s opinions is enough to create mild amusement in her audience benumbed by decades of leftist propaganda. No need to note that Russell is a scholar who has a Ph. D. and has written a book published by Oxford University Press on how Christianity was influenced by German culture during the early Middle Ages. No need for any informed scholarly opinions on his statements in the article in question. If that well-informed anthropologist and psychologist Rachel Maddow thinks something is outlandish, then it must be outlandish. End of story.
Maddow starts by labeling TOQ a “White supremicist journal” —shorthand for not having to deal with the ideas presented there and not being sensitive to the obvious difference between White supremacy and White advocacy. Does she think that it is always illegitimate for any ethnic group to seek to advance its interests? If so, then she should come out publicly against the ADL, the NAACP, and La Raza.
She then puts up on the screen this quote from the article:
"While liberals and universalists constantly yammer about “bringing us together” and “diversity is our strength,” it may be suggested that the biological function of human language and culture is just the opposite, that is, to keep discrete groups apart."
What an absolutely outrageous idea! Maddow, being Jewish by descent,* could not possibly be expected to grasp the concept of a culture that erects barriers between itself and the surrounding society—as Diaspora Judaism has done for its entire history and as Israel has now taken to the point of building walls between themselves and the Palestinians, providing separate roads and neighborhoods—in short, apartheid....
One would think that Maddow would be well aware that her people have had very strong socialization pressures for marrying within the group which has led to very strong genetic commonality among long-separated Jewish groups. Urgings by Jewish religious and secular authorities (e.g., Alan Dershowitz, Elliott Abrams) to marry other Jews are commonplace. But when Russell makes similar suggestions, he is labeled a racist and a kook.
Her piece is a good example of how the media is focused on changing the behavior of one group and one group only: White Christians.
*According to WikiAnswers, Maddow was raised Catholic, with an Irish mother and Russian father. She asserted she is “distantly Jewish.” See also here...MORE...LINK ------------------------- Rachel "Ricky" Maddow: confused about more than politics, but clear on who her mainstream media masters are ------------------------- Related: Rachel Maddow mocks, ridicules and demonizes Iran's president per the Judeofascist agenda
Last week a group of Palestinian fitness junkies no different from any group of hikers or bikers or joggers in the U.S. went for a hike in the hills of the occupied West Bank. I went along, and when we came to this ridge, an older man said we were looking down at the scene of a legend in Palestinian history: the Silwad sniper.
Down in the notch in the middle ground, you can see the Nablus road, going from north to south (left to right), and making a junction with a road from the east. A flagship Israeli settlement called Ofra is straight ahead. There used to be an Israeli checkpoint at the junction, protecting the settlers.
Then early one morning in March 2002, during the second intifadah, a young man from the village on the hill at the right, Silwad, crept down into the rocks and trees above the checkpoint with his grandfather's archaic WW2 rifle and 30 rounds, and as the sun rose he picked off Israeli soldiers. He killed 10 of them, and one settler. The echoes in the ravine kept the Israelis from knowing where the sniper was. When he had fired all his rounds, he crept back to the village.
Weeks went by, and then the sniper made a mistake. He told one man what he'd done. That person told someone else, and before long the Israelis arrested him. Today he is serving many life sentences.
As we walked away, I asked a Palestinian friend how many Palestinians regard the sniper as heroic. "Oh-- everyone. Except maybe Abu Mazen."
After the hike I learned more about the sniper's legend. His name is Thaer Hamad. His father is interviewed by Europeans here, who give him the hero treatment. The Boston Globe covered the case; his feat is debated among war fans; and Debka file argues that he can't have acted alone. You'll see that the facts are different in each version.
The terrain in the story reminds me of western legend, the mountains of the Spanish civil war. The Spanish Republicans' resistance to Franco's nationalists in the '30s is heroic. Think of the movie Pan's Labyrinth or the Hemingway novel For Whom the Bell Tolls. In Hemingway's novel, the brave peasant guerrillas make raids on soldiers on the road. There is no question whose side we're on; though yes, Hemingway lets us know how questionable violence is in Pilar's beautiful monologue about the civilian massacre in her village. All the fascists the republicans could get their hands on were mercilessly slaughtered, pushed off a cliff.
A modern Hemingway could never write For Whom the Bell Tolls about the Silwad sniper who made the mistake of opening his mouth. And Guillermo del Toro could never direct a Pan's Labyrinth about Palestinian resistance. Because mainstream western culture has so far only humanized one side in this struggle: the Israeli victims of the second intifadah--most of them civilians-- whose government is colonizing Palestinian land.
If you wrote an article or novel about the Silwad sniper who made the mistake of opening his mouth, a mainstream editor would demand that you humanize his victims, and tell their story too.
Obama's speech the other day to the U.N. General Assembly shows how limited the American view is of this struggle. He assailed Palestinians who resort to violence, but he did not address real Palestinian conditions. He did not acknowledge the chief cause of violence: occupation.
He spoke several times about Palestinian "dignity" but did not criticize the Israeli assaults on their dignity. And while he attacked Palestinian "rejectionists" and others who would "tear down" Israel, he did not mention the main reason people want to tear down Israel-- the occupation, its endless humiliation and dispossession of Palestinians...MORE...LINK
The story about how the state of Pennsylvania has employed an Israeli “security” company to check out various subversive groups, to include greens, Catholics, and teabaggers has predictably died without leaving a trace in spite of the valiant efforts of bloggers like Tom Meehan, http://odysseusontherocks.blogspot.com/2010/09/pennsylvanians-palistinians-what-s.html.
But the bigger question is to what extent has the security infrastructure of the United States been outsourced. To be sure, most of the outsourcing has gone to Israeli companies that have been able to exploit their alleged expertise on security issues. They have also benefitted from Congress’ grant of preferential status to Israelis when bidding on US government contracts, meaning that they often are able to undercut US companies because they have few R&D expenses, having either stolen the technology from US competitors or having received subsidies from the Israeli government to enhance their competitiveness. Israeli companies now dominate in the areas of transportation and telecommunications security, both of which are critical national infrastructures that should be restricted only to American companies employing American citizens. One recalls that at the time of the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinski scandal there were reports that the NSA had determined that a foreign nation had been listening in to White House phone calls. That foreign nation was Israel, able to do so because several Israeli companies had the contracts to provide various services relating to telephone monitoring. The Israeli companies involved are still active, having changed their names and shifted their business locations to the US, but their ownership and management continues to be Israeli.
Israeli owned airline security companies are also in the game, acting frequently as the local Mossad station. The companies have a number of times been caught isolating and then interrogating passengers who were apparently of interest to Israeli intelligence, but they continue to benefit from large contracts in both Europe and the United States to provided security services...LINK
Two days ago I visited the occupied Hebron area with Jeff Halper and Salim Shawamreh of the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions. I shot this video at Kiryat Arba, a religious settlement on stolen Palestinian lands in the hills outside Hebron.
You can see that the settlement freeze that has supposedly stopped construction of illegal colonies in the West Bank and that is due to expire in three days is being openly flouted. Look closely on the right in this video and toward the beginning you will see a white concrete truck leaving the settlement. Then you will see a crane for pouring concrete arched over forms on the second floors of four new houses. And if you look very closely, about halfway through the video, you will see a concrete truck in the upper middle part of the frame, whose tank is turning. Concrete trucks keep their tanks turning when they're filled with concrete, so that the mixture won't start to set up. This truck was getting ready to be unloaded. Another barely-visible truck is delivering yards of concrete.
While at Kiryat Arba, I saw many workers climbing on the scaffolding as they poured these new piers and floors.
...After Israel brutally attacked the Gaza flotilla, Jones allowed an apologist for Israel to defend its actions. He did criticize Israel's raid (Youtube: 'Alex Breaks Down Gaza Aid Flotilla Ship Attack by Israel ...' 4 parts), yet he has not emphasized the dangerous agenda inspired by Judaism's sacred Talmud and Kabbalah, with their history of fomenting communism and world revolution.
He has never exposed the well-documented Jewish dominance of big media-including Hollywood, the big three TV networks and the largest print media in America. (See, Jews Confirm Big Media is Jewish). Instead of speaking the truth, he says, "Hollywood is owned by the Arabs, and the Israelis for some reason. But the actual financing is mainly Saudi and Jordanian and the folks from Dubai and Qatar and a few other places and the British of course." (Youtube: 'Alex Jones Covers Up That Israel Owns Hollywood')
Clearly, Jones is not about to antagonize the Jewish power structure. He specializes in diverting attention to the lesser conspiracies of Masonry, the Illuminati, Bilderbergers, CFR, Trilateral Commission, even the Bohemian Grove, etc. He says self-righteously that he will not "wear Nazi armbands" by criticizing Zionism or Judaism's racial/religious goals. He will not associate with the "mentally ill" who express such concern.
Jewish/Zionist supremacism originated 2,000 years ago with the same Pharisees who crucified Christ. It is enshrined in Rabbinic Judaism's most sacred scriptures, the Talmud and Zohar (Kabbalah). This vast and hateful racist literature clearly states that Jews must someday control the world, after destroying the strong opposition that comes from Christian/capitalist civilization.
But according to Jones, the masses should not know too much of this controversial truth. The Patriot Movement should relate to dumbed-down Americans, who are oblivious to the Zionist danger, by ignoring it themselves. Yet such ignorance will not lead to safety.
Nor will the whole truth lead to fanaticism and violence. The truth about Jewish control in media, international finance and Congress will make many angry; that's called "righteous indignation." But it does not create violent, bigoted fanatics out of most people, whose moderation and perspective will encourage restraint. Instead, the whole truth will empower us to become discerning citizens who can defend American liberties, culture and foreign policy! Such enlightenment contributes to slowing unconditional support of Israeli injustices that inflame the Arab world; slowing the ability of the Anti-Defamation League to pass freedom-destroying legislation; slowing election and appointment of supremacist Jews to high office; slowing Jewish media's corruption of Christian culture and beliefs; slowing America's debt to Jewish international bankers through the Federal Reserve ? in short, slowing the advances of Jewish supremacism to destroy Christian civilization!
Jones: Media Manipulator
Jones' mentality is that of every dictator and censor, who says half-truths secure the threads of social fabric and the safety of governing elite. History reveals that ending such censorship leads to liberty. When the Bible finally became accessible during the Protestant Reformation, Rome's dominion was shattered. The profusion of Biblical truth resulted in independence of thought and action, vital to the founding of the greatest social experiment in history: the United States of America.
If the whole truth poured out, the Zionist stranglehold on western nations would be demolished. We could see a new age of enlightenment and renewal. The whole truth does not radicalize society; it stabilizes it.
Jones vilifies true patriots and attempts to scare us away from facing reality. He says that, when patriots criticize Jews and Israel, they are playing into the globalists' hands, who pit one group against anther, desiring to create world chaos. The truth is, the globalists are Jewish supremacists. Yet Israel, ADL, Rothschilds, Bronfmans, etc. above everything else, fear worldwide exposure and criticism. By cautioning patriots against criticizing (bashing) Jewish supremacists, it is actually Jones who sows mass confusion and inaction, becoming one of the NWO's best protectors. It is hard to defend Jones from the charge that he sows disinformation along with the truth.
By urging the same ruinous appeasement of the Jewish supremacist agenda as have Christians and conservatives for the past century, Jones, despite his bluster, is an appeaser. His "moderation" on the Jewish issue is really a mask for his enormous fear of Jewish power.
A year ago, a trusted friend of mine, then a Jones supporter, told me he called Jones' office and, surprisingly, Jones answered. During their conversation, Jones expressed anxiety about criticism of him for not addressing the Jewish issue. But he feared the Zionists more.
"The Jews," Jones said, "own everything."
Jones wants us to believe he isn't afraid and will not hesitate to tell the whole truth. Yet his conspicuous silence about the threat of Jewish supremacism speaks powerfully: Alex Jones lives in fear of the Jews...MORE...LINK ------------------------- ONCE UPON A TIME, JONES WOULD SPEAK TRUTH TO POWER...
LAST JUNE, veteran White House reporter Helen Thomas was fired for telling Jews to “get the hell out of Palestine.’’ While many were deeply and rightly offended by Thomas’s remarks, it was a sad end to a storied journalism career.
Tweet 10 people Tweeted this1 person Dugg thisdiggdiggYahoo! Buzz ShareThis Howard Kurtz of The Washington Post suggested that if “Thomas had said the opposite thing about the Palestinians, she’d still have her job.’’ Journalist Jeffrey Goldberg disagreed. “If you gave this long diatribe about [how] the Palestinians don’t exist, which is sort of the equivalent argument, I don’t think you’re going to last that long in the mainstream press.’’
But recent events allow us to test Goldberg’s hypothesis. Martin Peretz, the longtime owner and editor-in-chief of The New Republic, mused on his blog, The Spine, whether Muslim Americans “are worthy of the privileges of the First Amendment which I have in my gut the sense that they will abuse.’’
Coming under criticism, Peretz backtracked. “I wrote that,’’ he acknowledged, “but I do not believe that.’’ However, Peretz reiterated his equally offensive claim that “Muslim life is cheap, most notably to Muslims,’’ which he called “a statement of fact, not value.’’ Nor did he apologize for writing that the Palestinians are “a fictional people.’’
Over the years, Peretz has regularly denied the existence of Palestinians as a real people with national claims worth acknowledging. For example, he has written:
■ “The defeat of the Arabs of Palestine and the five warrior Arab states in 1948, 1967 and 1973 made a fictional people into a political force. We do not yet know whether this political force will mature into a real people. Or nation. My bet is ‘no.’ ’’
■ “The Palestinians may not be the Palestinian nation. But they are who they are. It is not Washington that makes them fantasists.’’
■ “Only if you are ‘Eyeless in Gaza’ can you believe that these people [the Palestinians] are a ‘nation.’ ’’
Peretz’s writing career has essentially been a series of, to quote Goldberg, “long diatribe[s] about how the Palestinians don’t exist.’’ Yet he continues to receive a special dispensation for these libels, while Thomas received public condemnation and a pink slip for her single denial of Jewish national claims...MORE...LINK
20 September -- The Department of Homeland Security released $19 million to secure non-profits, the vast majority Jewish.
Of 271 institutions named in a list released this week by DHS, 254 are Jewish, including synagogues, schools, community centers and offices.
The funds were released as part of a congressionally mandated program in place since 2005 that targets institutions that are vulnerable to attack.
Security measures funded include “blast proof windows; reinforced doors, locks, gates, and fences; video surveillance; and other equipment and enhancements” as well as training, according to a release by the Jewish Federations of North America, the federations umbrelaa body that lobbies annually for the funding.
“The Nonprofit Security Grant Program is a proven resource that helps supplement the work of local and federal law enforcement to help keep us safe,” William Daroff, JFNA’s Washington director, said in a statement.
Other groups lobbying for the money include two Orthodox umbrella bodies, the Orthodox Union and Agudath Israel of America.
O.U. called the funds “an important tool to help prevent terrorist attacks and protect civilians in case of such attack” and Aguda said “threats and actual incidents of violence against Jewish targets in the United States and around the world point to the particular vulnerability of our community.”
Sen. Barbara Mikuski (D-Md.), who has shepherded the funding through congressional appropriations, said she remained committed to sustaining the program.
“I have fought for these funds in the past, and I will keep fighting to protect institutions that are vital to our communities and the physical, social, spiritual and educational well-being of all Americans,” she said.
From: The Pollard Principle Why Jonathan Pollard is a national hero in Israel (AntiWar.com) -- by Justin Raimondo
On July 13 of this year, the municipal government of Jerusalem honored one of Israel’s most popular national heroes, a man who had suffered and sacrificed his all for the Jewish state, and is recognized by practically everyone as not only a hero but a modern exemplar of Zionist virtue. As evening fell, lights illuminating the walls of the Old City were dimmed “as a gesture of solidarity with convicted spy Jonathan Pollard,” reported Ha’aretz. “As part of Tuesday’s event, a special message calling upon US President Barack Obama to release Pollard will be projected onto the darkened city walls.” July 13 marked the 9,000th day of his incarceration.
Yes, in Israel they’re counting the days until this traitor is released, and their message – hand the traitor over – is now being projected by Israeli negotiators, who are pressing the US for Pollard’s release in exchange for yet another temporary halt to their aggressive “settlement” building campaign. The settlements have become a big sticking point obstructing the peace process, with unelected Palestinian “President” Mahmoud Abbas threatening to walk if the Israelis don’t lay off.
This illustrates what I call the Pollard principle: whenever there’s a showdown between the US and Israel, a difficult negotiation involving some concession the hard-headed Israelis refuse to budge on, the Israeli side always raises the Pollard issue. It was raised during the Wye negotiations, and Bill Clinton toyed with the idea until then CIA chief George Tenet and a whole raft of intelligence and military officials threatened to resign in protest.
The enormity of Pollard’s crime is largely forgotten, today, but several former US government officials have testified to it, including Caspar Weinberger, who wrote in a 46-page memorandum detailing the damage done by Pollard’s treason
“It is difficult for me, even in the so-called ‘year of the spy,’ to conceive of a greater harm to national security than that caused by the defendant in the view of the breadth, the critical importance to the U.S., and the high sensitivity of the information he sold to Israel.”
Seymour Hersh got the goods on Pollard in a 1999 New Yorker piece in which he reports two schools of thought within the intelligence community on the Pollard case: those who believe “the Israelis repackaged much of Pollard’s material and provided it to the Soviet Union in exchange for continued Soviet permission for Jews to emigrate to Israel,” and those who “go further,” and point out that a great deal of Pollard’s thievery – directed, as it was, by his Israeli handlers – involved information valuable only to the Soviets.
This suggests active Israeli-Soviet collusion, a case made by CIA director William J. Casey, who, reports Hersh, “stunned one of his station chiefs by suddenly complaining about the Israelis breaking the ‘ground rules.’ The issue arose when Casey urged increased monitoring of the Israelis during an otherwise routine visit, I was told by the station chief, who is now retired. ‘He asked if I knew anything about the Pollard case,’ the station chief recalled, and he said that Casey had added, ‘For your information, the Israelis used Pollard to obtain our attack plan against the U.S.S.R. all of it. The coordinates, the firing locations, the sequences. And for guess who? The Soviets.’ Casey had then explained that the Israelis had traded the Pollard data for Soviet emigres. ‘How’s that for cheating?’ he had asked.”...MORE...LINK
Last week it was reported that Tea Party activists had made the Pennsylvania terror threat list generated by an Israeli company. Now we learn that Second Amendment as well as anti-tax activists were also snooped by the state with the assistance of he Institute of Terrorism Research and Response.
The Institute of Terrorism Research and Response warned that police would have to use “crowd control” on Second Amendment activists.
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reports today that a state lawmaker has demanded answers from the Rendell administration on why a taxpayer-financed bulletin intended to identify terror-related threats included two Capitol rallies he organized this year. “This is the type of activity you hear so many people talk about when they say what they think is wrong with government,” said Republican Rep. Daryl Metcalfe. Metcalfe’s annual Second Amendment rally draws activists and gun owners from around the state.
"Pennsylvania militia groups apparently are planning on attending” the event, the Israeli company, the Institute of Terrorism Research and Response, said in the bulletin. It warned law enforcement might have to provide “crowd control.”
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reported that the event was peaceful and there was no evidence of militias in attendance.
Metcalfe said that the Israeli company issued a bulletin about his anti-tax group in June. It mistakenly said the Constitutional Organization of Liberty (COOL) was sponsoring the rally, Metcalfe said. “That’s news to me,” Metcalfe said. “COOL did not help me organize it. I am not sure if anyone from COOL attended.” COOL, an educational, non-partisan group is based in Lebanon, Pennsylvania.
Rep. Daryl Metcalfe said he was meeting with House Republican lawyers to determine what can be done about the state and an Israeli company teaming up to snoop on constitutuioanlly protected dissent. “Did they tap anyone’s phone?” Metcalfe asked. “Have I been investigated since the rally?”
After the September 11, 2001, attacks, the FBI discovered an espionage ring that had penetrated the wiretapping system of U.S. law enforcement. The espionage operation reportedly included employees of two companies, Comverse Infosys and Amdocs. Comverse Infosys and Amdocs are based in Israel...MORE...LINK ------------------------- JEWISH ZIONIST GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA ED RENDELL GETS HILLARY HOT: "Hiring Foreign Spies and Bringing Israeli Military Values to America"
These Judeofascists claim they will be "scapegoated," but deep down they know it's not a process of scapegoating at all, but rather a process of holding Jewish Zionists accountable for their crime against Americans -- crimes such as enabling the 9/11 attacks, lying us into the Iraq war, swindling us with various Fed, Wall Street and bankster grifts, corrupting our politicians via the Israel lobby and bribery, and destroying our culture and body politic via mainstream media and Hollywood.
What these Judeofascists fear is not scapegoating, but rather accountability. Taking responsibility for his crimes against humanity is as alien, anathema and unheard of for the Judeofascist as it is for the devil himself. It's never the devil's fault, but rather God's for not allowing the devil to have his way. Same with the Judeofascists: "Why, if only you hadn't resisted our agenda and gone with the flow, everything would have turned out all right."
Let's quote Jesus to the Judeofascist Pharisees in reply: “You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies.”
AN OLIGARCHY OF POWER centered on Wall Street is now plaguing America with both an economic crisis and the demise of the American worker.
A cabal of Zionist bankers, the Israel Lobby, and the Jewish-owned media are intertwined through finance capital, political dominance, and opinion-forming propaganda — in quest of a Judaic World Order headquartered in America.
As a result of off-shored jobs which serves the interests of Wall Street — and in turn, the interests of the Israel Lobby through Jewish investment profits and consequent funding — the Zionist-dominated press is preparing American workers to accept “less” as Jewish Supremacists receive “more.”
Through its columnists such as Thomas Friedman, the New York Times has been preparing the American worker to accept a lower standard of living or “get fired” while the monetary gulf widens between the white collar Jew and the blue collar Gentile:
"Welcome to the lean years. We just had 70 fat years in America. But now is the time to trim, to fire, and to downsize services, programs and personnel.” View Entire Story Here.
Another Jewish apologist for the downsizing of the American workforce is Michael Mandelbaum of the Council on Foreign Relations who sees a great “taking away” from blue collar Gentiles:
“We are entering a new era where the great task of government and of leadership is going to be about taking things away from people.” View Entire Story Here & Here.
THE ATTENTION to the export of jobs did not awaken until white collar jobs began to evaporate along with manufacturing jobs with no replacement jobs in sight. A US company can hire a software developer in India for $6.00 an hour and a data-entry clerk earns $2.00 an hour in India.
Thus, Jewish investments banks such as Citigroup and Goldman Sachs advise their corporate clients (many corporations have Citigroup and Goldman Sachs as directors on their boards) to outsource overseas without an ounce of concern for the American worker...MORE...LINK -------------------------
Chris Moore comments:
The irony is that these Jewish bankers have both the post-Christian Left and the Judaized-Christian Zionist Right triangulated in America -- essentially have them both in a full-nelson, and are slowly using them to suck the body politic dry. And of course, it takes two to tango; in other words, the reason they (and we) are being sucked dry is because both the Statist Left and Statist Right got into bed with Zionist Jewry to begin with.
The reason Statists and Jewry go together like yin and yang is because Jewry is too racist to proselytize, and so needs a powerful, authoritarian, centralized State to do its bidding coercively, whereas Christians rely on persuasion and moral appeals for gaining hearts and minds.
The Judeofascist bankers, crony Capitalists, crony Socialists, and scheming Judeofascist media, and all their patrons on Left and Right, together form the Shyster Class that is stripping America to the bone for its own profit.
The anti-Statist Tea Party is a promising start to the purging of the Judeofascists and their Left/Right Statist collaborators from the seats of power. The Federal Government, its Keynesian Jewish bankers, and all their choking tentacles must themselves be stripped to the bone so that Christianity can get oxygen and begin to re-grow. And as we know, a healthy Christian body politic has little tolerance for Judeofascists, their collaborators, and their corrupting influence.
With them purged, health will return. ------------------------- The Judeofascist bankers dole out trinkets to naive, stunted, child-like Shyster Class patrons on Statist Left and Judaized-Christian Zionist Right in exchange for selling out the country
Why are so many Israelis arrested over illegal arms deals worldwide? The U.S. authorities' recent arrest of an Israeli for seeking to sell arms to Somalia raises disturbing questions and answers. (Haaretz) -- by Yossi Melman --
At least seven Israeli arms dealers are currently in jail in four countries - the United States, Russia, France and Britain - on charges of illegal arms dealing. Some of them are also suspected of crimes such as forgery, bribery, money laundering and violating UN Security Council embargoes. Such arrests are briefly covered in Israel and then forgotten. But they have a cumulative effect that is very damaging to Israel's image, or what remains of it.
Even though it is doubtful whether those in jail know one another, they have quite a lot in common. All are men in their fifties or sixties. All are well to do (or were in the past ), having made most of their money in international arms dealing or in exporting security services and equipment from Israel. They served in the Israel Defense Forces and reached mid-level ranks (from captain to lieutenant colonel ), and when they were arrested, they denied the charges. Friends who came to their assistance described them, naturally, as "the salt of the earth."
All seven are familiar faces in the corridors of the defense establishment, and at one time received arms dealing permits from the Defense Ministry. All sought to "expedite procedures" in violation of local or international laws, and did so out of pure greed. Due to this covetousness, they also fell into traps and can expect to face many years in jail...
The latest Israeli to find himself behind bars is Hanoch Miller, 53, who was arrested a few days ago in the United States. Together with his partner, retired U.S. Air Force colonel Joseph O'Toole, he is charged with attempts to obtain and sell thousands of AK-47 (Kalashnikov ) rifles to the "government" of Somaliland, a separatist region of northern Somalia. The arms were to have been purchased in the United States and to have been sent on cargo planes to Panama and Bosnia, and from there to Somaliland. But the plan fell through because the third partner, who was supposed to purchase the rifles for Miller and O'Toole, was actually an informer for the customs authorities...MORE...LINK
From: What Israel wants from the Palestinians, it takes By colonizing the West Bank and depriving Palestinians of basic rights, Israel has made a two-state solution impossible. (Los Angeles Times) -- by Ahmed Moor --
Israel's ambassador to the U.S., Michael B. Oren, argues in his Sept. 15 Times Op-Ed article that Israelis want peace, and I believe him. They've said so often enough. But the Israelis want lots of other things too.
For instance, they want the West Bank and East Jerusalem. In addition, they want the Palestinian aquifers situated beneath the West Bank, and they want to preserve their racial privilege in the Jewish state. They also want to shear the Gaza Strip from Palestine.
Most of all, the Israelis want Palestinian quiescence in the face of Israeli wants. Those wants have made the two-state solution impossible to implement.
For decades, the Israelis have taken what they want from the Palestinians. Consequently, there are about 500,000 settlers in Jewish-only colonies in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Today, the Israelis are discovering that what one wants and what one can afford sometimes diverge.
Some Israelis — but apparently not Oren — are beginning to realize that the deep, irreversible colonization of territory comes with a price: the end of the Jewish state as it is. It's a painful lesson to learn, especially after decades of superpower indulgence. America's obsequious coddling turns out to have been a curse for the Jewish state. Serious cost-benefit analyses around occupation policies — collectively, apartheid — were evidently never conducted.
When Israel killed 1,400 Palestinians in Gaza — proportionally equivalent to 300,000 Americans — in Operation Cast Lead, incoming President Obama stayed mum. The Israelis counted on and got American cover. But they didn't anticipate the impact of Richard Goldstone's damning report on world opinion and the American layperson's views. No one seems to have ever asked, "Wait, what will killing more than 300 children do to our image abroad? Can we afford to launch an assault against a defenseless and captive population just because President Bush says we can while Obama remains silent?"...MORE...LINK
George Schwartz was born in Hungary in 1930 - not the luckiest time and place to be born a Jew.
George’s father Theodore tried to change the family’s fortunes by changing their name to something less Jewish-sounding. It didn’t help. And soon war came.
When the Nazis took total control of Hungary in 1944, the Holocaust followed. In two months, 440,000 Hungarian Jews were deported to death camps.
To survive, George, then a teenager, collaborated with the Nazis.
First he worked for the Judenrat. That was the Jewish council set up by the Nazis to do their dirty work for them. Instead of the Nazis rounding up Jews every day for the trains, they delegated that murderous task to Jews who were willing to do it to survive another day at the expense of their neighbours.
Theodore hatched a better plan for his son. He bribed a non-Jewish official at the agriculture ministry to let George live with him. George helped the official confiscate property from Jews.
By collaborating with the Nazis, George survived the Holocaust. He turned on other Jews to spare himself.
George moved to London after the war and then to New York, where he became a stockbroker. He’s rich now. Forbes magazine says he’s the 35th richest man in the world. Maybe you’ve heard of him. He goes by the name his father invented: George Soros.
How does Soros feel about what he did as a teenager? Has it kept him up at night?
Steve Kroft of 60 Minutes asked him that. Was it difficult? “Not at all,” Soros answered.
“No feeling of guilt?” asked Kroft. “No,” said Soros. “There was no sense that I shouldn’t be there. If I wasn’t doing it, somebody else would be taking it away anyhow. Whether I was there or not. So I had no sense of guilt.”
A Nazi would steal the Jews’ property anyways. So why not him?
That moral hollowness has shaped Soros’ life. He’s a rabid critic of capitalism, but in 1992 when he saw a chance, he speculated against the British pound, causing it to crash, devastating retirement savings for millions of Britons. Soros pocketed $1.1 billion for himself. If he didn’t do it, someone else would, right?
In 2002, Soros was convicted of insider trading in France, and fined millions of dollars. He admitted buying the shares, but denied it was a crime.
Last year, when he made $3.3 billion off the banking collapse, he called the world’s financial crisis “the culmination of my life’s work.”
This is a man who boasted he offered to help his mother commit suicide. Apparently he didn’t see enough death in Hungary.
Soros is a sociopath. But he’s a sociopath with $14 billion, and he likes to spend it on politics...MORE...LINK -----------------------
Chris Moore comments:
If only the modern West had listened to the wisdom of the ancients, Judeofascists like Soros and the Jewish Bolsheviks on the statists Left, the neocons on the Statists Right, and the Zionists that hop back and forth in between the two would never have had the breathing room to rise up like serpants and strike their poison into the world.
This sappy, Judeo-Christian Zionist/Judeophile liberal veneration of Jewry is unquestionably a materialistic, post-Christian, modernist phenomenon that is the antithesis of Christianity.
In fact, Jesus couldn’t have been clearer about what he thought of corrupt organized Jewry, and prophetically warned us of the evils of the Talmudists in his condemnation of “the Jews” in general and the Pharisees in particular. One example among many: “You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies.”
Granted, it was largely atheistic Statism that indoctrinated these “progressive” post-Christian attitudes, but a child could see that it has been Jewry pulling the strings of mass Statism since the days of Marx, at least. Additionally, modern “new world man” generations of Westerners smugly thought they knew better, and so they put their fingers in their ears when it came to the wisdom of the ancients.
Yet certain Whites (and of course, as always, liberals why try to blame “religion” in general) still want to scapegoat Jesus for the fact that the Judeofascists are so powerful today — as if he didn’t warn the world in a way so that even the mentally challenged could understand it centuries ago.
The existence of the murderous Soros', Bolsheviks, Zionists, neocons and their morally corrupt statist-liberal/State Capitalist collaborators isn't the problem; like the cobra, they are only doing what comes to them by "nature." The problem is our own moral failures in containing them, and when absolutely necessary, severing their serpant heads before they can strike and do murder. ----------------------------
In this You Tube video, Barbara Lerner Spectre, who runs a government-funded Jewish study group in Sweden, makes the following remarkable statement—remarkable because she does not attribute anti-Jewish attitudes to irrational prejudices or even Muslims who hate Israel. Instead she says that it’s because of the “leading role” played by Jews in the movement toward multiculturalism:
I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.
So organized Jewry now instructs us that it is inevitable that European countries are "not going to be the monolithic [Christian] societies they once were in the last century,” but that Europe will now be “transformed” into a patchwork of multi-cultural societies without identity, “and Jews are going to be at the center of that” transformation.
This sounds more like a confession by Jewry of planned premeditated murder for group gain and advancement than it does a social, cultural or political forecast.
So in addition to Islam, it is now clear that Jewry has declared war on Christian Europe. These death cult Zionists and their suicidal Left-Right followers won’t be happy until the entire world is at their throats, which shouldn’t be long now. Yet apparently in their own minds, they’re on the cusp of world domination.
Their mentally unbalanced delusions are unbelievable. Americans and Europeans have been tied at the waist by our corrupt elites to a cult of maniacs. I say cut them all loose and send them hurtling to Israel, where they belong, before they manage to spark World War III.
***
At its height, the Nazi Party only had 8.5 million members. There are around 14 million Jews. Let’s suppose only half of them are Zionists (probably a very low estimate). Seven million cohesive, determined, single-minded fanatics can accomplish a hell of a lot. And when you factor in Jewry’s age old religious instruction in the art of ethnocentricity, power acquisition and subversion, honed over millennia, what’s remarkable is that their ascension took as long as it did, and that they are today already again becoming pariahs in more and more circles.
Clearly they’re not as invincible as we’ve been led to believe. In fact, it probably won’t be long before even craven politicians will have to think twice before aligning themselves with Zionism, which is increasingly looking like a sinking ship.
Just as the post WWII generations completely mismanaged and squandered America’s moral authority and cat bird seat, so to have Zionists squandered Jewry’s.
Arrogant, entitled pricks tend to fall fast and hard, especially in the Age of the Internet.
The Bipartisan Policy Center’s National Security Preparedness Group’s September 10th report "Assessing the Terrorist Threat" concludes that there is a growing threat to the United States derived from the radicalization of some American Muslims, a number of whom have joined extremist groups abroad. The report and its conclusions have received wide distribution in the United States mainstream media, to include a Washington Post article on September 11th headlined "US Must Deal With Homegrown Terror Problem." National Public Radio reported it as "Homegrown terrorists pose biggest threat" while the Associated Press headlined "US must deal with domestic radical problem."...
If the Bipartisan Policy Center is seriously interested in examining threats against the United States rather than starting new wars or persecuting a religious group, I would suggest that they set up a new task force and take a long hard look at the actions of the Israel Lobby. They could start by talking to Ross, Rademaker, Rubin, and the two Makovskys since they are members in good standing of the Lobby and are readily available, probably sitting somewhere down the hall. Explain to them how United States security has been compromised by the tie that binds with Israel and how its institutions have been corrupted. Suggest to them that official Washington insofar as it relates to the Middle East is an AIPAC-run enterprise. Run through the list of the State Department’s Assistant Secretaries of State for the Near East and discover that all of them have been Israel-firsters ever since Martin Indyk, an Australian citizen and AIPAC lobbyist, obtained the post in 1997. Bush appointee and hawk Jeffrey Feltman currently holds the position, virtually guaranteeing that there will be no shifting of allegiance at Foggy Bottom. Describe to them the more than $120 billion that Israel has received directly from the US taxpayer and discuss with them the many spies for Israel that have avoided prosecution because of government fear to cross AIPAC.
And then there is AIPAC itself. You might explore with Dennis Ross why he thinks AIPAC should not be registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act even though it describes itself on its website as "America’s Pro-Israel Lobby." And you can chat a bit in a friendly way about how it works through intimidation and a large number of pro-Israel PACs to control Congress. And then there are the Israel-firsters in the media, the gatekeepers of truth and managers of the narrative. Names like Will, Krauthammer, Horowitz, Zuckerman, Ignatius, Thomas, Kristol, Friedman, and Brooks come to mind but there are many, many more. And remind them of the stories that just won’t go away, like Senator Arlen Specter trying to make everyone forget how Israel illegally obtained uranium from a plant in Pennsylvania owned by one Zalman Shapiro and used it to make bombs. Or the nagging accounts of Israeli spying, the most aggressive effort to steal American secrets by any country considered to be friendly.
And never forget that the Lobby is bipartisan. There are the billionaire Crown and Pritzker families of Chicago, exceptionally good friends of Israel and President Obama’s money men, and Aubrey and Joyce Chernick of Los Angeles who have been funding the recent anti-Muslim frenzy. And let’s not leave out Irving Moskowitz the California bingo king and Pastor John Hagee of Christians United for Israel, who both actively support the illegal expansion of Israeli settlements. And speaking of the settlers, the "charitable" funding that enables them to arm themselves and steal Palestinian land is a tax write-off thanks to a congress, treasury, and justice department that prefer to look the other way.
Yes, there is quite a lot to examine and if anyone is seriously interested in genuine threats against the United States AIPAC and the Israel Lobby are good places to start. But to do so would not be welcomed in many influential circles and there would be inevitable retaliation from the chattering class and the media. The well-funded Bipartisan Policy Center would attract the anger of some very powerful and wealthy people and would suddenly find itself less well-endowed as its supporters disappear. Instead of taking on the Lobby let’s follow the Center’s sage advice and amble down a more inviting and less controversial path. Let’s bomb the hell out of Iran shortly before locking up American Muslims in prison camps to keep them out of mischief. Such measures will undoubtedly stop nuclear proliferation and end the international terrorism problem while the friends of Israel will be able to sleep soundly in their beds knowing that they will not be troubled by the Bipartisan Policy Center...MORE...LINK -------------------------
Chris Moore comments:
The Jewish supremacist (ie Zionist) agenda comprises Gentiles as well as Jews, as Zionism is a full blown political ideology that includes elements and factions of both the Left and Right, Jew and Gentile alike.
Americans should no longer regard Zionism as a "Jewish thing," but rather as a fully developed political framework with a program and agenda that goes far beyond merely the question of Israel and includes the questions of the Mideast wars agenda, the neocon geopolitical agenda, and even domestic hierarchy as well. Zionism is really an entire world view revolving around the social, political and economic implications of institutionally assigning Zionist Jewry a hierarchical role at the head political society at both a national and international level, and its Gentile Zionist attendants, collaborators and sycophants huge measures of power, influence and wealth themselves.
Only when Zionism is viewed as the comprehensive messianic ideology it is (not unlike Communism and Fascism) can Americans and the world fully appreciate the true nature of the Zionist question and the gravity of its threat.
Life is really easy if you are in the business of refuting “anti-Semites.” Bret Stephens of the Wall Street Journal has a predictably vacuous column on the comments of Karel De Gucht–a topic previously discussed here. Mr. De Gucht stated, “Do not underestimate the Jewish lobby on Capitol Hill.” Stephens says that the comment dispenses with “the usual fine-grained, face-saving distinction about the difference between a ‘Jewish’ and an ‘Israel’ lobby.”
What makes it so easy for Stephens is that he doesn’t have to actually provide any data showing the relationship between Jews and the Israel Lobby. It’s enough to simply say that De Gucht failed to make the distinction to brand him an anti-Semite. Of course, it wouldn’t have mattered if he referred to the Israel Lobby. That too would doubtless cast him as an anti-Semite. Titling their book The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy certainly didn’t prevent [Walt and Mearsheimer] from being labeled anti-Semites.
Stephens uses the same tactic in dismissing De Gucht’s statement that “There is indeed a belief—it’s difficult to describe it otherwise—among most Jews that they are right. And it’s not so much whether these are religious Jews or not. Lay Jews also share the same belief that they are right. So it is not easy to have, even with moderate Jews, a rational discussion about what is actually happening in the Middle East.”
Stephens comments:
Here, then, was a case not of “criticism of Israel” or “anti-Zionism,” the usual sheets under which this sort of mentality hides. Mr. De Gucht’s target was Jews, the objects of his opprobrium their malign political influence and crippled mental reflexes. If this isn’t anti-Semitism, the term has no meaning.
Again, Stephens feels no need to actually discuss whether Jews tend to behave this way. The subject is out of bounds–automatically nothing more than “anti-Semitism.”...
Near the heart of the financial meltdown was the towering self-confidence of Larry Summers, Robert Rubin and Alan Greenspan in opposing any regulation on the derivatives market. Summers seems to be pivotal. When Brooksley Born, head of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, proposed that some thought should be given to regulation, Summers reportedly said “I have thirteen bankers in my office, and they say if you go forward with this you will cause the worst financial crisis since World War II.” As Johnson and Kwak note (p. 9), we don’t actually know if there were any bankers in Summers’ office; “more likely he came to his own conclusion.” The point is that Summers had an unshakable faith that what he was saying was correct–a faith that was not based on the way the world actually works. Nevertheless, Ms. Born was successfully pushed aside and ultimately a law was enacted preventing any regulation of the derivatives market. It’s quite analogous to Freud’s total confidence in the Oedipal Complex as a core doctrine of psychoanalysis and expelling anyone who disagrees.
Self-deception is not the entire story here. More likely, it relates to the centrality of charismatic leadership among Jews–a theme of Culture of Critique and very apparent in the Bernie Madoff scandal: The rabbi guru surrounded by worshipful disciples. Madoff was “like a God” People around him “regarded Bernie like a messiah. He was spoken of as if godlike.” “He was received like visiting royalty, mysterious and unapproachable” (see John Graham and Kevin MacDonald, “Is the Madoff Scandal Paradigmatic?”) He was brilliant; a genius. Because of his financial wisdom, everything turned to gold. Naysayers were ignored, and Jewish naysayers were labeled anti-Semites for not believing in the wisdom of Bernie.
Of course, Madoff exploited this tendency toward hero worship among Jews to his own advantage and defrauded others in the process. In the case of the imperial wars so confidently trumpeted by the neocons and in the financial meltdown, the victims are the entire country. And the scary thing is that Summers is still running the economy...MORE...LINK -------------------------
I was struck by its Stephens’ headline: Europe Reverts to Type/The EU’s response to anti-Semitism? “No comment.”
How I read this is that Stephens believes Europe is reverting to its “anti-Semitic,” Christian type, and this trend should be arrested. I find it ironic in that even as these Jewish Zionists demand a clash of civilizations with Islam, they only want it on their terms, meaning it has to be the Jewish-engineered Judeo Christian Zionist/statist-liberal-Capitalist identity as the flag under which the West is clashing, and not an authentic Christian identity.
Jewry is so smug and arrogant at this point that it doesn’t even bother hiding its contempt and hostility towards the West’s Christian heritage in favor this lobotomized, neo-American, Noahide equivalent. Zionist Jewry’s agenda reminds me a lot of Jeffrey Dahmer’s experiments of lobotomizing his victims in order to turn them into zombie sex slaves.
These people have the minds of serial killers.
***
Regarding the second half of the article, it seems that large elements of Jewish collective are highly prone towards bandwagoneering. Whether its Marxism, Zionism, or neo-conservatism/neo-liberalism, if enough Jews are “doing it,” then it’s the next big thing, and if you’re not in on it than you are a pathetic outlier who’s behind the times, “no question about it.”
This is an incredibly dangerous mentality for any society’s elite to have, because the bandwagon may be going in one direction today, and the complete opposite direction the next day. In addition to Jewry, this ungrounded, unprincipled, schizophrenic mentality seems to have plagued the more Jewish-influenced elements of American society going back decades.
These pathetic modern Goy elites following around Jewry like lost puppies are as ungrounded and nuts as the schizophrenic Jews themselves. No wonder America is such a mess today.
In the last two days two guides have taken me through the geography of the Israeli occupation of East Jerusalem, and I’m staggered. I wonder why this monstrous structure is not better known, even to people like me, who study the conflict. I wonder how it is that American reporters are not describing the racist devouring of Jerusalem every day in our newspapers and showing it every night on our television news. I wonder why our politicians, or our liberal Democratic ones anyway, are not holding angry press conferences in front of the repulsive separation wall as it lunges to separate a Palestinian village from virtually all its connections to the outside world, so as to privilege the lifestyle, and short commute, of Jews in the new development on the hilltop above them.
I wonder why Rabbi Arthur Waskow, who calls for boycotting the “pharaoh” of BP as a response to the destruction in the Gulf, cannot see the Pharaoh’s works right here and call for boycott. I wonder how it is that Ethan Bronner of the New York Times, who lives in West Jerusalem, could give lectures back home about covering the story and lament the (remote) possibility of Palestinians moving back into Arab houses in West Jerusalem when the only real movement and dispossession, eastward, is in front of his eyes; and millions of Palestinian ambitions are blighted by lack of freedom of movement and constant insults to their human rights. And believe me, if a fraction of what the Palestinians are experiencing were happening to Jews, it is all we would hear about.
But let me try to be a little more reportorial.
What I’m seeing is the result of 40 years of Jewish colonization of one of the jewels of world civilization. During the 43-year occupation, the Israelis have essentially constructed a system of spears radiating out from Jewish West Jerusalem into Palestinian East Jerusalem, and on into the West Bank. These new Jewish neighborhoods are designed to solidify Israeli control over greater Jerusalem in the event of any possible division of the place in a two-state solution, but more important, to make Jerusalem into a Jewish city by choking off the Palestinian life of this international city.
And yes, I imagine, there is a security component to the thinking too. They want to kill us, we have to keep them behind fences.
The choking-off is what I saw in my tours. As this colonization progresses, it takes more and more village land around the city and throws out more infrastructure to serve the colonists, special roads and high barbed wire fences and walls to protect the drivers and their communities. The infrastructure isolates more and more Palestinians from one another. You can tell Palestinian villages from the black water vessels dotting the rooftops—because their water is shut off for days at a time...MORE...LINK
From: Europe Reverts to Type The EU's response to anti-Semitism? "No comment." (Wall Street Journal) -- by BRET STEPHENS --
If a top European mandarin mouths off about Jews and the rest of Europe's political class acts like it's no big deal, does that make them cowards, accomplices—or just politically astute? Probably all three.
Earlier this month, Karel De Gucht, the European Union's trade commissioner and a former foreign minister of Belgium, gave an interview to a Flemish radio station in which he offered the view that the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations were sure to founder on two accounts: first, because Jews are excessively influential in the U.S; second, because they are not the sorts to be reasoned with.
"Do not underestimate the Jewish lobby on Capitol Hill," Mr. De Gucht said, dispensing with the usual fine-grained, face-saving distinction about the difference between a "Jewish" and an "Israel" lobby. "This is the best organized lobby, you shouldn't underestimate the grip it has on American politics—no matter whether it's Republicans or Democrats."
Nor was that all the commissioner had to say on the subject. "There is indeed a belief—it's difficult to describe it otherwise—among most Jews that they are right," he said. "And it's not so much whether these are religious Jews or not. Lay Jews also share the same belief that they are right. So it is not easy to have, even with moderate Jews, a rational discussion about what is actually happening in the Middle East."
Here, then, was a case not of "criticism of Israel" or "anti-Zionism," the usual sheets under which this sort of mentality hides. Mr. De Gucht's target was Jews, the objects of his opprobrium their malign political influence and crippled mental reflexes. If this isn't anti-Semitism, the term has no meaning.
But perhaps it no longer does, at least in Europe. "I regret that the comments that I made have been interpreted in a sense I did not intend," Mr. De Gucht said, by way of non-apology. "I did not mean in any possible way to cause offense or stigmatize the Jewish community. I want to make clear that anti-Semitism has no place in today's world."...
...But whatever Mr. De Gucht's motives, the more interesting phenomenon has been the European non-reaction. "No comment," says a spokesman for German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle. "Our position on anti-Semitism is very clear but we have no comments on other people's statements," says a spokesman for Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini. "High Representative [Catherine] Ashton is confident [De Gucht] didn't mean any offense, and that he apologized," says a spokeswoman for the EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. "He made personal comments for which he expressed his personal regret and there is no further comment to make," says a spokesman for the European Commission...
...consider that last year the Anti-Defamation League conducted a survey of European attitudes toward Jews in seven different countries. Do Jews have "too much power in the business world"? In France, 33% said this was "probably true"; in Spain it was 56%. Were Jews to some degree responsible for the global economic crisis? In Germany, 30% thought so; in Austria, 43% did. A separate 2008 Pew Survey also found that 25% of Germans, 36% of Poles and 46% of Spaniards had a "very" or "somewhat" unfavorable opinion of Jews.
As part of his defense, Mr. De Gucht insisted he was only offering his "personal point of view," and not those of the European Commission as a whole. He shouldn't be so modest. He has his constituency. It's why he remains in office. It's why Europe's future is beginning to look increasingly like Europe's past...MORE...LINK -------------------------
A DRIVE TO CREATE a system of corporate cartels intended to replace nation-states as the political organization of the planet was launched in Post WW II Europe.
An alliance of six European banks was emboldened in its mission to replace national policies with the dictates of finance capital owing to a global atmosphere of financial instability in war-devastated Europe.
According to Lyndon LaRouche, each of the members in the alliance represented a bank in one of the principal nations of the European Economic Community: -1- Kredietbank of Belgium; -2- Nederlandsche Middenstandsbank; -3- Credit Commercial de France; -4- Nuovo Banco Ambrosiano of Italy; -5- BHF Bank of Germany;-6- Privatbanken of Denmark.
The operation was run by Jacob Rothschild of N.M. Rothschild in London. In a speech in 1983, Rothschild outlined the mission of the project: “Two types of institutions, the worldwide financial service company and the international commercial bank with global trading competence, may converge to form a many-headed financial conglomerate.” For Rothschild, it was not a prediction, but a statement of intent. View Entire Story Here.
The new cartel scheme, dubbed as, “The Multinational Enterprise,” was championed by George W. Ball, undersecretary of state under Kennedy and Johnson, and later, senior banker (Gentile window dressing) at Lehman Brothers from 1968-1982.
Ball predicted a conflict between the Multinational Corporations and Nation-States, saying: “The Multinational Enterprise is a modern concept evolved to meet the requirements of the modern age. The Nation-State, a very old-fashioned idea, is poorly adapted to serve the needs of our present complex world.”
Nation-states, in the worldview of George Ball and the Jewish financiers he represented, were to share their sovereignty with the banking houses.
Hence, beginning in the late 1960s, nations were no longer sovereign, but colonies of the international banking cartel, a multinational enterprise, funded, (and therefore run), by Jews. It was the Wall Street bankers that pushed through the GATT Agreement eventuating in the World Trade Organization that eliminated tariffs on imports resulting in the destruction of American manufacturing.
Tariff-free trade is demonstrated today by the marriage between finance capital and multinational corporations.
For example, US investment banks such as Citigroup and Morgan Stanley — (Robert Rubin/Co-religionists runs Citigroup & Jim Rosenthal runs Morgan Stanley) — are in the oil tanker business for storing crude oil.
THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN NATION-STATES and internationalism is best understood in the conflict waged by Adolph Hitler prior to WW II against finance capital.
When the National Socialists came to power in 1933, the German economy was in total collapse. Through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit, not beholden to international Jewish financiers, Hitler was able to turn a bankrupt Germany into the strongest economy in Europe.
By issuing interest-free money, the German government, under Hitler and Economics Minister, Hjalmar Schacht, financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold and without debt.
With full sovereignty intact, policies of economic nationalism and full employment thrived, thanks to the German industrialists, (not given to an internationalist spirit), who supported Hitler’s “Germany First” agenda.
IT TOOK THE ENTIRE capitalist and communist world to destroy the German revolution against internationalism and bring the entire European continent back under the heel of Jewish Bankers...MORE...LINK ------------------------- In retrospect, worse than Nazis? Comrades Churchill, FDR, and Stalin: Defeated racist Hitlerism, but secured the enslavement of Russia and the West to international Jewish bankers via atheist-materialist ideologies of State Capitalism and Communism -- a global victory for racist Zionism