Norwegian mass murderer Breivik’s ideological soulmates in Britain
(Redress) -- by Gilad Atzmon --
...Jewish media outlets in Israel and around the world are already aware of the deeply worrying fact that Breivik was inspired by right-wing ideologies associated with Israel and Zionism.
The JTA, which describes itself as “The Global News Service of the Jewish People”, was quick to admit that numerous online postings, including Breivik’s, adhere to a “mishmash of anti-modern principles” that call for "the deportation of all Muslims from Europe as well as from the West Bank and the Gaza Strip". Whether we like it or not, this “mishmash” of global Islamophobia and Israeli expansionism is the true face of contemporary Zionism and Israeli ideology.
And yet, there is a further central question that no one in the media has addressed yet. How is it that Melanie Phillips is getting away with openly promoting vile Islamophobia in our midst? How is it that she and other Zionists prevail, exactly where the English Defence League and the Britisn National Party fail? Why is Melanie Phillips a celebrity while the BNP’s Nick Griffin is regarded as a vile racist, and a social outcast?
Similarly, I find myself wondering what on earth the board of “progressive” Guardian editors had in mind when they nominated the Zionist, neocon, pro-war and openly Islamohopbic Harry’s Place as one of their favourite political blogs in 2005 – roughly the same time that the very same Harry’s Place blog won the “Annual Islamophobia Awards 2006”, within the UK section of the Islamic Human Rights Commission's Annual Islamophobia Awards?
I believe that the answer is devastating: within our so-called, liberal, democratic and allegedly “tolerant” discourse, it is only right-wing Jews who are entitled and allowed to spread xenophobia and hatred.
This is hardly surprising, because unlike contemporary Westerners, who seem to be more than confused by their colonial heritage and notions such as nationalism, racism, expansionism, biological determinism, religion and narcissism, Israel and Zionism actually openly celebrate all of these afflictions. It is anything but surprising, then, to see Israeli flags and Jewish symbols popping up in many far right gatherings in the UK and in other European countries, because Israel, it seems, makes racism look kosher.
The shocking ideological resemblance of the thoughts and ideals of the fearsome mass murderer Breivik and mainstream Zionist advocates, such Melanie Phillips, Daniel Pipes, David Horowitz and Harry’s Place, should surely be a bright red alert for any sensible humanist. If we want to save our society from being dragged into a violence with no end, we must de-Zionize every possible aspect of our culture, media and political institutions...MORE...LINK
Chris Moore comments:
Why is Judeofascism allowed, encouraged and celebrated in the mainstream, supposedly “tolerant” and “liberal” discourse, while other fascists are rejected? Because just as organized Jewry transmuted the universal aspects of Communism to primarily serve organized Jewry’s particularistic agenda and interests, it has transmuted liberalism into liberal fascism to serve organized Jewry’s particularistic interests.
Just study the massive Jewish ownership and influence in all manner of post-Christian, Western institutions from government to media to finance, and it’s not at all hard to see how easily Judeofascism (which is inherent in the Jewish religion and thus organized Jewry) is able to transform liberal democracy into liberal fascism to serve its own interests.
And of course, because they're obsequious, venal, and greedy pseudo-Christian cowards and "conservative" frauds, the Judeo-Christian Zionist and neoconned mainstream Right rolled over for it all, selling out not only Christianity, but the entire Western ethos in the process.
There's no doubt a special place in hell not only for the Judeofascists, but for their liberal fascist and neocon fascist Left-Right collaborators and doormats -- and that place is calling their name.
Can a ruling class made up of a 2% ethnic minority with a massive chauvinist streak devolve into anything other than some form of petty totalitarianism or fascism? How does the story end on a good note, when even the rise to power was done in an underhanded way?
Post a Comment