What a prescient description of the Jews that would go on to invent and instigate communism, and then fashion the atheist-materialist-liberalism and pseudo "holy" Zionism that has so infected the West today, and is rotting it to the core at this very moment through cynical statism, warmongering, and crass greed.
“for you neither go in yourselves, nor do you allow those who are entering to go in.”
This reminds me of Orwell’s description of “the Party” in his allegory of some unnamed, sinister, totalitarian successor ideology to communism, 1984. I believe "the Party" was an allusion to Jewry, which worships itself, and sees itself as eternal on this earth. Psychologically, it has to see this earth as its entitled, totalitarian realm because it knows there will be no afterlife for the Jew (nor, of course, for his leftist, statist-liberal, neocon, and money-worshipping dupes).
From 1984, starting in Part 3, Chapter 2:
“But I tell you, Winston, that reality is not external. Reality exists in the human mind, and nowhere else. Not in the individual mind, which can make mistakes, and in any case soon perishes: only in the mind of the Party, which is collective and immortal. Whatever the Party holds to be the truth, is truth. It is impossible to see reality except by looking through the eyes of the Party.”'If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — for ever.'
‘You are thinking,’ he said, ‘that my face is old and tired. You are thinking that I talk of power, and yet I am not even able to prevent the decay of my own body. Can you not understand, Winston, that the individual is only a cell? The weariness of the cell is the vigour of the organism. Do you die when you cut your fingernails?’…
‘We are the priests of power,’ he said. ‘God is power. But at present power is only a word so far as you are concerned.”
'The earth is as old as we are, no older. How could it be older? Nothing exists except through human consciousness.’
‘But the rocks are full of the bones of extinct animals — mammoths and mastodons and enormous reptiles which lived here long before man was ever heard of.’
‘Have you ever seen those bones, Winston? Of course not. Nineteenth-century biologists invented them. Before man there was nothing. After man, if he could come to an end, there would be nothing. Outside man there is nothing.’
“There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother. There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no literature, no science. When we are omnipotent we shall have no more need of science. There will be no distinction between beauty and ugliness. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — for ever.’ "
‘We have beaten you, Winston. We have broken you up. You have seen what your body is like. Your mind is in the same state. I do not think there can be much pride left in you. You have been kicked and flogged and insulted, you have screamed with pain, you have rolled on the floor in your own blood and vomit. You have whimpered for mercy, you have betrayed everybody and everything. Can you think of a single degradation that has not happened to you?’
Isn't this the exact perpetual-war vision for the world being pursued by the neocons, the neolibs, the Zionists, and their Left-Right collaborators and useful idiots both now, and since the days of communism?
The "vision" clearly started well before any of this.
As have others, I also once read 1984 as purely an allegory to Stalinism and Communism, (and to a lesser extent, Nazism) but upon closer inspection, one will find that Orwell explicitly states “Big Brother” and “the Party” are post-Communist formulations that regard themselves as far more effective and sophisticated totalitarians than the Communists. As O'Brien says:
'Now I will tell you the answer to my question. It is this. The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power. Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness: only power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently. We are different from all the oligarchies of the past, in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites. The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just round the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now do you begin to understand me?'Additionally, reading Part 3, Chapter 3 closely, one finds that Goldstein is working for Big Brother and the Party as a double agent (Orwell's clear inference being that most lefty-Jews who hold themselves up as “revolutionaries” or "secularists" are actually double agents working for organized Jewry, in the vein of Trotsky, who, like Marx, constantly surrounded himself with Jews and had all manner of Jewish contacts.).
'As you lie there,' said O'Brien, 'you have often wondered you have even asked me -- why the Ministry of Love should expend so much time and trouble on you. And when you were free you were puzzled by what was essentially the same question. You could grasp the mechanics of the Society you lived in, but not its underlying motives. Do you remember writing in your diary, "I understand how: I do not understand why"? It was when you thought about "why" that you doubted your own sanity. You have read the book, Goldstein's book, or parts of it, at least. Did it tell you anything that you did not know already?'It all ads up: Orwell was warning the world that organized Jewry was behind Communism, and using it as a Trojan horse for Jewish supremacist ideological Zionism.
'You have read it?' said Winston.
'I wrote it. That is to say, I collaborated in writing it. No book is produced individually, as you know.'…
The more the Party is powerful, the less it will be tolerant: the weaker the opposition, the tighter the despotism. Goldstein and his heresies will live for ever. Every day, at every moment, they will be defeated, discredited, ridiculed, spat upon and yet they will always survive. This drama that I have played out with you during seven years will be played out over and over again generation after generation, always in subtler forms.
Anti-religion leftists argue that religion itself is the problem, and intractable religious conflict proves it. This is echoed by biological atheists and racial determinists, who say that ethno-bloodlines determine all long term survival and alliances, and Jewry's behavior, longevity, and contemporary success prove it.
Given that all great civilizations arose around either religion or God-myth, it's, likely that the first civilizations arose BECAUSE of the concept of God, and without the concept of God, they never would have arisen from the mire in the first place. Indeed, perhaps God was always there, and man had to evolve far enough intellectually to recognize the concept, which then sent social evolution into overdrive.
That makes "intellectual" anti-religion leftists not only ingrates, but parasites.
Biological atheists and racial determinists, on the other hand, would reduce society into all against all, because for them, bloodlines are paramount right down to familial bloodlines. Or they would revert society back to royalism, wherein the strongest bloodline rules out and pacifies society through brutish will of that clan, which then become the royalist line around which society rallies.
Visionaries recognize that great civilizations need broad concepts and common ties to hold them together, "fantasy" or not, "myth" or not.
Western civilization has elements dating all the way back to Homeric Greek myth, but which reached its apex rallying around Christianity. Inspired by myth or not, the accomplishments of Western civilization, both intellectual and material, are real.
Jewry is a predatory, parasitical element within Western civilization. If it strangles the rallying point of that civilization (Christianity) it can feast upon the dying carcass until it collapses, and easily exterminate all scattered, biological opposition the way its Bolsheviks exterminated the Cossacks, for example, in Soviet Russia.
What good is atheism or biological lineage going to do for their respective adherents when they've been turned to ashes by Judeofascist totalitarians, or been sent to their graves to be feasted upon by worms?
Christianity has been the most successful and humane long term answer to the question of insatiable, predatory Jewry and its murderous, totalitarian designs, with the added benefit of playing a major role in the inspiration of the greatest civilization in the history of man.
The road back to authentic Christian moral authority runs through libertarian nationalism, which will remove Big Government Zionist, leftist and crypto-racialist right-wing thumbs from the scales and allow the marketplace of ideas in which Christianity excels (as proven by the long term success of Western civilization prior to the advent of string puller-serving "secular" Big Government) to rule out.
Post a Comment