Jewish ADL first incites domestic anti-Islamic environment, then accuses Christians of hate -- all to leverage "anti-terrorist" laws against both

From:
ADL Tightens "Domestic Terrorist" Noose Around Christians
(National Prayer Network) by Rev. Ted Pike --

In attempting to end free speech and criminalize Christians, the Anti-Defamation League (architect of hate laws worldwide) is promoting two contradictory agendas. First, it warns Congress that Islam is highly vulnerable to extreme interpretation by Muslim terrorists. At the same time it derides “Islamophobe” Christians for fearing Islam and Sharia law! ADL characterizes anti-Jihadist evangelicals (even if they are staunchly pro-Israel) as “haters,” whose inflammatory criticism of Islam inspires anti-Islamic terrorists like Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik.

Why ADL's conceptual schizophrenia?

To pass Christian-persecuting “anti-terrorist” laws, ADL must first magnify the threat of Islamic terror. The many instances of Islamic-based violence provide high-octane arguments to persuade Congress to limit freedom. But the agenda of portraying the religious right as a threat to freedom and diversity – arguing that violence-inciting Christians should also be penalized under anti-terrorist laws, must also go forward. Thus, ADL expresses abhorrence at Christian criticism of Islam.

Only by coordinating creation of new legislation spawned by fear of Islam, and at the same time heightening public fear of “Christian” terrorism, does ADL believe it can accomplish sweeping anti-terrorist laws that will envelop both Jihadists and Christians.

ADL, in statements such as the following, recently testified before the Senate Department of Homeland Security, warning that radical Islam is a top security threat.

“Americans motivated by radical interpretations of Islam constitute a growing and increasingly dangerous domestic terror threat. Since the September 11 terrorist attacks, nearly 200 Americans have been charged for their roles in various bomb plots and conspiracies in the U.S., as well as for providing material support to Islamic terrorist groups.

American Muslim extremists fueled by hatred of Jews and Israel have planned a number of terrorist attacks within the U.S.

About one fourth of those arrested since the September 11 attacks have been converts to Islam who embrace the most extreme interpretations of the religion.

The shooting at Fort Hood demonstrates the particular danger posed by so-called "lone wolf" extremists who, though unaffiliated with terrorist groups, share their radical interpretations of Islam and ideological goals

An increasing number of American women motivated by radical interpretations of Islam have been involved in terrorist activity ranging from planning terrorist plots, to raising funds and provided material goods to foreign terrorist organizations.

American Muslim ideologues living abroad are increasingly using their online pulpits to reach and influence audiences in the U.S. with ideologies of extreme intolerance and violence.

Now listen to ADL reverse itself.

Abe Foxman, in yet another warning to the general public of how dangerous Christian/conservative criticism of Islam is, said this past week,

Adherents of this ideological Islamophobia view Islam as an existential threat to the world, especially to the ‘West.’ Moreover, they believe that leaders and governments in the Western world are consciously or unconsciously collaborating to allow Islam to "infiltrate" and eventually conquer democratic societies. Left-wing ‘multiculturalist’ sentiments tear down traditional European culture, they argue, allowing Muslim immigrants to replace it with ‘their own’ culture and values. The result, they claim, will be the demographic, cultural and, eventually, political suicide of the West -- unless action is taken to stop it.

Foxman says the American right is in the throes of anti-Islam hysteria, comparable to emerging early 20th century anti-Semitic (Nazi) movements in Europe! “This belief system goes far beyond anti-Islamic prejudice based on simple religious or racial grounds. In a sense, it parallels the creation of an ideological -- and far more deadly -- form of anti-Semitism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries on the backs of the previously dominant cultural and religious forms of anti-Semitism.”

Such Nazi-like bigotry among evangelicals, Foxman suggests, is proliferating rapidly. He says “many people hold views similar to Breivik's. In the United States, we have seen frequent manifestations of this ideology, including the eager promotion by anti-Islamic zealots of a growing conspiracy theory about "creeping Sharia law." The obvious danger to Americans and Europeans is that, as this movement grows and solidifies, more people may become motivated to violence by this hateful ideology.” (ADL.org, “Norwegian Attacks Stem From a New Ideological Hate”)...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

This article captures several common characteristics and tactics of organized Jewry.

1) Jewry seeks to divide and conquer, and pit different racial, ethnic and religious groups against one another so it can distract from its own malicious crimes and racketeering, and opportunistically exploit conflict between different groups by secretly cutting separate deals and agreements with multiple parties simultaneously.

We see this, for example, in Jewry's simultaneous deal-making and coalition-building with left-wingers, multiculturalists and minority ethnic groups in the Democratic Party, which Jewry dominates, while it is at the same time whispering in the ear of the Christian Right that Jews and Christians must stick together to push the war agenda and "save Israel," and that "God blesses those who bless the Jews."

2) Jewry also seeks to incite domestic conflict and even violence to ratchet up a Big Government police state. Because Judaism doesn't proselytize, due to its Hebrew-supremacist racism, it requires a powerful state to do its bidding, and a highly centralized state is far more conducive to top-down (Jewish) control than is a diffuse state. This is why Jewry has sought to build powerful central governments from Soviet Russia (the Jewish Bolsheviks) to America (the Jewish left-liberals, neocons and Zionists) to Israel (the national socialist Jewish Zionists) and everywhere else it is confident that its "nation within a nation" can gain control of government and then use that government to destroy its rivals and enemies.

This insatiable and relentless drive for a highly centralized, totalitarian government engineered to serve its particularistic interests is what makes Jewry inimical to the traditional Western ideals of equality, liberty and freedom, and a threat to the traditional American form of government -- with its (formerly) strict constitutional limitations, division of powers, and states-rights component -- in particular.

Abe Foxman may seem a self-parody and caricature of the scheming, ear-whispering, double-dealing, well-poisoning Jewish stereotype, but unfortunately he is a common and accurate representation of organized Jewry's character, modus-operandi, and essence going back centuries.

With that in mind, is it any wonder Jewry has been so despised, scorned, and persecuted over the centuries? And really, given that it is their own actions, agenda, and machinations that have brought non-Jewish wrath down upon Jewry's head, is it really "persecution" that describes their plight, or can it be more accurately described as "blowback"?