Saturday, October 22, 2011

Is organized Jewry volitional in its own evil agenda, or merely unwitting captive of an evil ideology? Zionists say it's cognizant and culpable

Introduction by Chris Moore:

This is the question Gilad Atzmon raises in the following article, and it's an important question, particularly for Jews who claim Judaism isn't inherently fascist.

If that's the case, then why is the vast majority of organized Jewry so hell bent on perpetuating Israeli Zionism and Diaspora Zionism, which is unquestionably a fascist enterprise? And why is the vast majority of Jewish leadership so hell bent on keeping the vast majority of Jewry on the ideological Zionist "reservation"?

Here's my take on exactly what's going on here.

Many people have heard the expression "Jews are just like everyone else, only more so," meaning Jewish fanatics are prone to taking any human characteristic or ideology to an unnatural extreme.

Similarly, it has historically been a human characteristic and failure to allow the most ruthless, cunning and fanatical elements of society to claw their way to the top, and then dictate from there. This is exactly what's going on with organized Jewry today, which is clearly being run by extreme fascists, who are deferred to by their followers, which consequently implicates the vast majority of Jewry in Zionism's evil agenda and designs.

This evil Zionist leadership knows it is now in the spotlight, that it can no longer go about claiming that it is merely the reactionary "victim" of history acting out of self-preservation, or that it is merely the tail being wagged by the Anglo-American Empire dog. Why? Because its Diaspora wing has so thoroughly penetrated the leadership of Anglo-American Empire, and is directing that Empire to pursue Zionists interests.

Consequently, this evil Zionist leadership knows it needs the vast majority of Jewry as a kind of mass "bodyguard" to defend against its critics, harass antagonists with accusations of "anti-Semitism," and to point to to validate claims that critics are attacking "all" Jews, whom it is essentially hiding behind as the heat gets turned up.

Here's the kicker, though. This patriarchal, hierarchical, top-down organizational structure, which conditions the Jewish cult to acquiesce to its Jewish guru leadership, is inherent to the Jewish religion itself from Abraham through Moses through David. Later, the Pharisees (biblical precursors to modern Jewish groupings like the Jewish Bolsheviks, Jewish Zionists and Jewish neocons) became the collective patriarchal leadership, which is how Jewry is run today -- by a collective pharisaic leadership.

And here's the second kicker. The post-WWII West is currently being run by what I call "The Defective Generation," (defective due to its cowardly acquiescence to and complicity in the face of Jewish predations to the point where Jewish Zionists are now largely running the place, whereas previous generations of Christians and Christian-partisans running the Greco-Christian West had far less to zero tolerance for Jewish predations). Consequently, the current generation of Jewish leadership is also defective, meaning it reflects the general low ethics, low character, low honor and lack of principle of the larger, ignoble, Defective Generation of Gentile elites that surrounds it and enables it.

Hence, because "Jews are like everyone else, only more so," what this means is that the current generation of Jewish leadership itself is exponentially more heinous, reckless, selfish, negligent and irresponsible than The Defective Generation of non-Jews that surround it.

This is the Jewish leadership that Atzmon is currently up against, like David vs. the fascist Goliath that organized Jewry has become...or always was.

--------------------------

From:
Gilad Atzmon: Thank God for the Jewish Chronicle

(gilad.co.uk) -- by Gilad Atzmon --

As always, the London Jewish Chronicle (JC) is providing us with an accurate insight into Jewish influence within the media and beyond. The JC is desperate to stop my book, The Wandering Who -- and it is also foolish enough to disclose its tactics, openly revealing to us the pressure which some elements within the Jewish community are willing to mount on Britain’s leading newspapers and other outlets...

The JC complains that “in the book Atzmon discusses his belief that ‘the Holocaust religion was well-established’ before the Nazis carried out aspects of the Shoah including the Final Solution and Kristallnacht.”

The JC is absolutely correct here. That is exactly what I am discussing. And yet, the question is, what is wrong with doing so? Is it racist or anti-Semitic? And indeed, I also insist that trauma is inherent to Jewish Culture. Here is, for instance, an old Jewish joke from the 19th century

A Jewish Telegram:

‘Get Worried, details to follow’.

In ‘The Wandering Who’ I contend that Jewish identity politics is defined by a unique condition, namely, ‘Pre Traumatic Stress Disorder’. It is the ‘future trauma’ that shapes the Jewish present and ideology.

The JC is also concerned with the following quote: "It is more than likely that 'Jews' do not have a centre or headquarters. It is more than likely that they aren't aware of their particular role within the entire system, the way an organ is not aware of its role within the complexity of an organism."

And yet I am puzzled by their concern: what is exactly wrong with the above? If anything, it suggests that there are no Jewish conspiracies, and that Jews as people are actually innocent of the sinister associations of such.

Or, does the JC prefer to argue otherwise? Would The JC insist that Lord Levy knew exactly what he was doing when he was the leading fundraiser for a government that took Britain into an illegal war? Does the JC prefer to argue that Neocons David Aaronovitch and Nick Cohen knew exactly what they were doing when they advocated the same war on every British press outlet that was foolish enough to let their voice be heard?

I actually seem to be slightly kinder to Aaronovitch, Cohen, Levy, Saban, Wolfowitz, Freidman, Sharon, Peres, Livni, Greenspan, Foxman and many others: I am happy to agree that they were hijacked by a lethal ideology or culture rather than being consciously sinister...

And now here is the good news: it seems as if the JC/Guardian joint efforts to stop ‘The Wandering Who’ have been totally counterproductive, for according to Amazon, The Wandering Who is number 2 on the ‘Bestsellers in Religious History of Judaism’ list...MORE...LINK

No comments: