From:
Shooting of Jewish Congresswoman Giffords Is Not Just a "Tragedy"
(Tikkun) -- by Rabbi Michael Lerner
...When right-wingers create a climate of hate against liberal government, and then individuals act on that hate as they did in blowing up a Federal Building in Oklahoma City and now this premeditated murder of several people (we are still praying for the survival of Congresswoman Giffords) in hate-filled Arizona (where she had been attacked viciously but not physically for her support of health care reform), the state whose racism has made it famous around the world for profiling Mexican immigrants, there is no call to investigate and protect ourselves from these right-wing hate mongers...
And don't underplay the anti-Semitic elements either. According to Ha'aretz newspaper, the killer's website had Hitler's hate book Mein Kampf listed as one of his favorite books! When Jews are targeted, it's rarely "by chance." Right-wing haters particularly hate Jews, since Jews were the most consistent non-African American constituency for the Democratic Party , in 2010 voting 70% for Democrats. If the rest of the country voted like Jews we'd have a liberal Democratic Congress. And this is not lost on the right-wingers. Just listen to the tapes of Nixon and you see how extreme the hatred of Jews is revealed to be by the "moderate" Nixon, and now we have the more extreme elements of the Right coming to power. Jews are, in the minds of these haters, the same as liberals or progressives--maybe even the worst of them. And then, the sexism of the right manifests dramatically in attempting to kill a woman--the perfect symbol of uppity feminists who dare to take power away from the male chauvinists who thought that "their" country was about white male Christian power. You won't hear the media dealing with these dimensions of the reality--but they are central...MORE...LINK
Monday, January 10, 2011
Sunday, January 09, 2011
Targeted Congresswoman expressed Zionist and Jewish supremacist views, but little evidence gunman motivated by religion
From:
Jewish Giffords' shooting suspect: 'No! I don't trust in God!'
(USA Today) -- by Kathy Lynn Grossman --
Were U.S. Rep Gabrielle Giffords and her aide, Gabe Zimmerman, targeted by suspected gunman Jared Loughner because they're Jewish?
Or was that incidental to a shooting spree that killed the young aide and five others and left the U.S. representative gravely wounded?
While Loughner's illogical comments on God, government, calendars and cash circulate on the Internet, Jewish media quickly spotted that Hitler's Mein Kampf is among the alleged gunman's favorite books -- an eclectic list that also included Aesop's Fables.
Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik has said, "Yes, I believe she was the target."Add that to Gifford's proud status as Arizona's first Jewish U.S. representative and rumors of anti-Semitic motives boil to the surface. In this photo taken Wednesday, Jan. 5, 2011, House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio reenacts the swearing-in of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., on Capitol Hill in Washington,, whose hand is on a Jewish bible.. Giffords is in critical condition after being shot in the head in her district in Arizona Saturday, Jan. 8, 2011.
The shooting came just days after she began her third term. She was holding a copy of the Jewish Bible, the Five Books of Moses, for a ceremonial photo with Speaker of the House John Boehner.
YnetNews, the Internet arm of popular Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, reports,
JTA, a Jewish news service, reports:
For all the instant analysis that this might be tied to political attacks on Giffords and others who supported President Obama on health care reform, there's not a whiff of politics in Loughner's language about coins and calendars and other ramblings. Yet he does exclaim in his YouTube video, "No! I won't trust in God!"...MORE...LINK
Jewish Giffords' shooting suspect: 'No! I don't trust in God!'
(USA Today) -- by Kathy Lynn Grossman --
Were U.S. Rep Gabrielle Giffords and her aide, Gabe Zimmerman, targeted by suspected gunman Jared Loughner because they're Jewish?
Or was that incidental to a shooting spree that killed the young aide and five others and left the U.S. representative gravely wounded?
While Loughner's illogical comments on God, government, calendars and cash circulate on the Internet, Jewish media quickly spotted that Hitler's Mein Kampf is among the alleged gunman's favorite books -- an eclectic list that also included Aesop's Fables.
Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik has said, "Yes, I believe she was the target."Add that to Gifford's proud status as Arizona's first Jewish U.S. representative and rumors of anti-Semitic motives boil to the surface. In this photo taken Wednesday, Jan. 5, 2011, House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio reenacts the swearing-in of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., on Capitol Hill in Washington,, whose hand is on a Jewish bible.. Giffords is in critical condition after being shot in the head in her district in Arizona Saturday, Jan. 8, 2011.
The shooting came just days after she began her third term. She was holding a copy of the Jewish Bible, the Five Books of Moses, for a ceremonial photo with Speaker of the House John Boehner.
YnetNews, the Internet arm of popular Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, reports,
Giffords is the granddaughter of Akiba Hornstein, the son of a Lithuanian rabbi who in the 1940s moved from New York to Tucson. He later changed his name to Giff Giffords in an effort to avoid anti-Semitism.
JTA, a Jewish news service, reports:
Giffords, 40, was raised "mixed" by a Christian Scientist mother and Jewish father, but said that after a visit to Israel in 2001, she had decided she was Jewish only. She attended services at a local Reform synagogue.She said at the time,
If you want something done, your best bet is to ask a Jewish woman to do it. Jewish women -- by our tradition and by the way we were raised -- have an ability to cut through all the reasons why something should, shouldn't or can't be done and pull people together to be successful."Yet. looking at Loughner's rants on YouTube and other writing such as his MySpace page, it's hard to find a coherent thought, much less to discern if the anti-Semitism her ancestor fled caught up to Giffords in front of a Tucson Safeway.
For all the instant analysis that this might be tied to political attacks on Giffords and others who supported President Obama on health care reform, there's not a whiff of politics in Loughner's language about coins and calendars and other ramblings. Yet he does exclaim in his YouTube video, "No! I won't trust in God!"...MORE...LINK
Thursday, January 06, 2011
Engineered by Hollywood Jewry, 'V For Vendetta' filled with anti-Christian imagery, designed to shill for Zionist/Judeofascist true totalitarians
From:
V for Zionism
(Revolt of the Plebes) -- by Keith Johnson --
On December 14, 2010, 56-year-old Clay Duke attended a board meeting of the Bay School District in Panama City, Florida. After a few minutes of deliberation, the meeting was opened up to the local citizenry. That’s when Duke rose from his seat, walked to a nearby wall, and spray-painted the letter “V” inside a red circle. The scrawl was a direct reference to the film V for Vendetta, whose hero—a masked vigilante named “V”—uses the same symbol as his signature trademark. Duke then pulled a gun, and ordered the room to be cleared of all but six board members.
“I’m going to die today,” said Duke, as he paced around the podium.
Duke had fallen on hard times. Like so many Americans, he was broke and unemployed. His wife, Rebecca, had been laid off from her job—with the same school district—and was about to receive her last unemployment check. To make matters worse, Duke suffered from a bi-polar disorder and was off his meds. He’d reached his breaking point, and decided to take his own life as a way out of his desperate situation. Unfortunately, he also planned to take a few people with him.
Two of the board members tried to reason with Duke, but to no avail. After a few minutes, he raised his firearm and began shooting. Luckily, none of the bullets made contact with his intended victims. Duke, however, was not so lucky. A security guard returned fire from behind and shot him in the leg. He fell to the ground and turned his gun on himself. That was the end of Clay Duke.
The incident received nationwide coverage, with the mainstream media placing heavy emphasis on Duke’s mental instability and past run-ins with the law. They were also very deliberate in their efforts to characterize him as a delusional paranoid...
Prior to his action, Duke posted this statement on his Facebook page:
“My Testament: Some people (the government sponsored media) will say I was evil, a monster (V)… no… I was just born poor in a country where the Wealthy manipulate, use, abuse, and economically enslave 95% of the population. Rich Republicans, Rich Democrats… same-same… rich… they take turns fleecing us… our few dollars… pyramiding the wealth for themselves. The 95%… the us, in US of A, are the neo slaves of the Global South. Our Masters, the Wealthy, do, as they like to us…”
Again, this doesn’t sound like a man who is completely ‘off his rocker.’ You have to admit that he was quite prophetic in his prediction that the “government sponsored media” would say that he was “evil” and “a monster.” They have, in fact, done just that. But what do you make of the rest of his observations? Do any of you, in this so-called ‘patriot movement’ of ours, see anything in there that you’d disagree with?
For the most part, the patriot movement has been careful to avoid applauding Duke for his actions. But that doesn’t mean they’ve been un-sympathetic. Unlike the mainstream press, the citizen’s media has been correct in pointing out that Duke, himself, was a victim of this tragic event. He was the victim of an economy that has been deliberately engineered to collapse, of a pharmaceutical industry that prescribes dangerous psychotropic drugs, and of a Zionist controlled Hollywood that produces films like V for Vendetta.
Oh, Boy! I just heard a thousand jaws hit the floor as they read the end of that last paragraph. You were all with me about the “economy,” the “pharmaceutical industry,” and maybe even about “Zionist controlled Hollywood.” But many of you were certainly ready to part ways with me for suggesting that there may be something insidious behind one of the patriot movement’s most cherished films.
In terms of cinematic fiction, V for Vendetta has become a cult classic among many patriots. It ranks right up there with 1984 and The Matrix...
For those not familiar with the film, here is the basic premise:
In the near future, Britain is ruled by a totalitarian government under the fascist Norsefire party. Evey Hammond, a young woman who works at the state-run British Television Network, is rescued from an attempted rape perpetrated by members of the secret police by a Guy Fawkes-masked vigilante known as “V”. He leads her to a rooftop to watch his destruction of the Old Bailey. Norsefire tries to explain away the incident as a controlled demolition, claiming the building was no longer structurally sound, but V takes over the state television broadcast the next day, exposing the lie. He urges the people of Britain to rise up against the oppressive government and meet him in one year, on 5 November, outside the House of Parliament Houses, which he promises to destroy.
-----
Christian imagery inserted into 'V For Vendetta' in order to conflate Christianity with villainy
-----
Patriots love films that are set in a dystopian future, where ‘lone wolf’ vigilantes take on ‘the system’ and sometimes sacrifice their own lives to inspire future generations to take up the cause from where they left off. Zionist controlled Hollywood understands this, and is more than happy to accommodate. They have their ear to the ground, and are fully aware of the rising patriot movement, and of the vast political awakening that has occurred since 9/11. Not only do they want to cash in on these disenfranchised people, but they also want to win them over to help propagate the Zionist agenda. They realize a revolution is imminent, and they want to make sure that they are instrumental in engineering and controlling that revolution.
If we are to believe that the New World Order is in control of Hollywood, and that they use all mediums to spread their propaganda, then we must be careful to scrutinize every little thing they offer us. Why would the NWO allow a film to be produced that inspires people to challenge their authority? Only the most naïve of us would suggest that this one flew low enough under the radar to escape their scrutiny.
No, this film was produced by the NWO specifically to direct the fear and loathing of its audience against the mythical image of a 4th Reich, and away from any criticism of Jewish power, the Israeli lobby, and the Zionist oppression of the Palestinian people.
-----
Yet more Christian imagery conflated with villainy inserted by Judeofascist propagandists into 'V For Vendetta's cinematography
-----
V for Vendetta is rife with Hitler, Nazi, and Holocaust imagery that are intended to further embed into our consciousness that all of our modern fears are entrenched in events that occurred over 65 years ago.
Zionists want to convince you that your fears of a fascist police state are precisely what they were fighting against during WWII. Regardless of what concerns you, Zionist propagandists will find a way to connect it with the Nazis. They are determined to condition you to believe that all evil emanated from Nazi Germany, and that most of the contemporary mechanisms of government control originated from that source. We are to believe that they, alone, are the enemy. They always have been, and they always will be...
This propaganda is relentless. I recently scanned through the TiVo directory on my TV cable box. First, I typed in the keyword, ‘Hitler.’ Over 70 titles came up for programs scheduled over the next two weeks. Here’s a short list: Hitler’s Ghost, When Hitler Invaded America, The Hunt for Hitler, The Fatal Attraction of Adolph Hitler, The Making of Adolph Hitler, and Hitler’s Last Deadly Mission.
Next, I typed in the word, ‘Nazi.’ 74 titles came up. Here’s that short list: Nazi Ghost Train, Nazi UFO Conspiracy, Nazis: The Occult Conspiracy, Nazi Secret Weapons, Nazi Supership, and Hunting Nazis.
Finally, I decided to type in the names of two other famous dictators: ‘Stalin’ and ‘Mao.’ I came up with squat. You know what else I didn’t find? I didn’t find any programs dealing with the USS Liberty, The Lavon affair or Operation Cast Lead. Go figure.
Is it that the American people are just not interested in other historical figures and events, or is it that we are being told what we should be interested in? I think we all know the answer to that. We have been, and continue to be, indoctrinated to only one significant event in history. It is this event, and those characters from that era, that drive the propaganda of the New World Order.
If you are constantly on your guard against Nazism, you become less inclined to criticize Israel...
American Free Press writer Michael Collins Piper explains this best in his book, The New Babylon.
He explains that the NWO is “the intended realization of a Talmudic dream to establish a Jewish utopia.” Their idea of utopia is a “global imperium” that is ruled over by a “Jewish elite.”
The Zionist movement is at the very heart of this realization, which specifically set out to create the state of Israel as a “geographic and political entity.”
Piper states that, “The Zionist cause has been integral to the plan for a New World Order.”
He goes on to explain that, “It was the rise of international Jewish finance, and the consequent emergence of the Rothschild Empire—as a foremost influence in that realm—that is central to advancing the New World Order.”
To paraphrase him further, Piper points out that the consolidation of Rothschild power over the British Empire laid the foundation for the political, financial, and structural framework of the New World Order.
Piper says that the United States today has become “the virtual engine of Rothschild power.” In the Jewish worldview, the United States constitutes, “The New Babylon.” It has become “the seat of power,” and the mechanism whereby which “they want to achieve the New World Order.”
This is the reality of the New World Order. But the makers of V for Vendetta would have you believe otherwise. They accomplish this by introducing Nazi imagery into a contemporary setting, and blending it with modern images of the police state: surveillance cameras, black-clad paramilitary police, etc. By doing so, they propagate the message that the threat of Nazism is still very much alive.
The political party that rules over the people with an iron fist is called Norsefire, alluding to the Nordic/Aryan archetypes and mythology that are alleged to be integral to Nazi ideology.
The colors of the Norsefire party’s flag are black, white and red, and also utilize a perverted cross symbol that is similar to the swastika.
The ‘Chancellor’ of the Norsefire party is an Adolph Hitler clone by the name of Adam Sutler, who delivers impassioned speeches in a Hitler-esque style.
Before being interrogated, the film’s heroine—Evey—is dressed down and has her head shaved. This familiar image of the concentration camp victim stays with her throughout the remainder of the film...
First of all, the film was adapted from a 1982 graphic novel by Alan Moore, a self-described Kabbalist and Chaos Magician who also penned the 1986 graphic novel “Watchmen,” that advocated false-flag terror as a Machiavellian “end justifies the means” scenario that unites the world under a global government following the nuking of a major U.S. city. But Moore actually distanced himself from the film version of V for Vendetta, complaining that the producers changed the “Fascism Vs. Anarchism” theme to “American Conservatism Vs. American Liberalism.”
Then we have Joel Silver and the Wachowski Brothers, all three of whom are powerful Jewish Hollywood producers. The Wachowski Brothers penned the script. They are also the creative force behind another partriot favorite The Matrix, which likewise contained a great deal of Zionist propaganda. For instance, Zion is the subterranean refuge that serves as the only safe place for the unplugged humans to escape from the evil machines.
Then, last but not least, we have Israeli actress Natalie Portman playing the part of the film’s screen heroine, Evey. Now, this may surprise many patriot fans of this movie. Did you know that—at the same time this film was in wide release—Ms. Portman was dating 36-year-old Nat Rothschild? That’s right—Nat Rothschild—from the same Rothschild family that most all of us patriots can agree sits at the very tippy top of the New World Order.
Now, all of these things might seem inoccuous and innocent when weighed individually. But when added together, they make a strong argument for the thesis I’ve set forth...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
Chris Moore comments:
The Zionists/Judeofascists are correct to be fearful of the traditional Christianity of Western Civilization because they realize it is the primary force that kept their murderous, totalitarian machinations and agenda at bay for nearly 2,000 years in the West until they were able to devise Marxism/Bolshevism (the basis for all Communism and Leftism, which murdered millions of Christians in the Soviet Union well prior to the rise of Hitler) to seize the levers of power. Communism failed economically, so they migrated to Zionism, left-liberalism and neoliberalism/neoconservatism, but their murderous, racist, Jewish supremacist totalitarian agenda remains the same.
Only their corrupt accomplices, along with brain-dead liberal rubes, Judeophile liberals, and Judeo-Christian Zionist yokels fall for their propaganda and trickery, or go along with it. Connoisseurs of Christianity and Western Civilization know who the true villains are, and knew that sooner or later their true, snarling, totalitarian faces and agenda would reveal themselves.
Today, the Zionists/Judeofascists are a sinking ship. The beauty is, they're going to take their elite collaborators -- some of the worst, most corrupt, devious, sinister, and subversive elements of society -- straight to the bottom with them, which will provide America and Western Civilization a clean slate to start anew.
The lot of them should start booking passage to the last refuge of scoundrels: Israel.
V for Zionism
(Revolt of the Plebes) -- by Keith Johnson --
On December 14, 2010, 56-year-old Clay Duke attended a board meeting of the Bay School District in Panama City, Florida. After a few minutes of deliberation, the meeting was opened up to the local citizenry. That’s when Duke rose from his seat, walked to a nearby wall, and spray-painted the letter “V” inside a red circle. The scrawl was a direct reference to the film V for Vendetta, whose hero—a masked vigilante named “V”—uses the same symbol as his signature trademark. Duke then pulled a gun, and ordered the room to be cleared of all but six board members.
“I’m going to die today,” said Duke, as he paced around the podium.
Duke had fallen on hard times. Like so many Americans, he was broke and unemployed. His wife, Rebecca, had been laid off from her job—with the same school district—and was about to receive her last unemployment check. To make matters worse, Duke suffered from a bi-polar disorder and was off his meds. He’d reached his breaking point, and decided to take his own life as a way out of his desperate situation. Unfortunately, he also planned to take a few people with him.
Two of the board members tried to reason with Duke, but to no avail. After a few minutes, he raised his firearm and began shooting. Luckily, none of the bullets made contact with his intended victims. Duke, however, was not so lucky. A security guard returned fire from behind and shot him in the leg. He fell to the ground and turned his gun on himself. That was the end of Clay Duke.
The incident received nationwide coverage, with the mainstream media placing heavy emphasis on Duke’s mental instability and past run-ins with the law. They were also very deliberate in their efforts to characterize him as a delusional paranoid...
Prior to his action, Duke posted this statement on his Facebook page:
“My Testament: Some people (the government sponsored media) will say I was evil, a monster (V)… no… I was just born poor in a country where the Wealthy manipulate, use, abuse, and economically enslave 95% of the population. Rich Republicans, Rich Democrats… same-same… rich… they take turns fleecing us… our few dollars… pyramiding the wealth for themselves. The 95%… the us, in US of A, are the neo slaves of the Global South. Our Masters, the Wealthy, do, as they like to us…”
Again, this doesn’t sound like a man who is completely ‘off his rocker.’ You have to admit that he was quite prophetic in his prediction that the “government sponsored media” would say that he was “evil” and “a monster.” They have, in fact, done just that. But what do you make of the rest of his observations? Do any of you, in this so-called ‘patriot movement’ of ours, see anything in there that you’d disagree with?
For the most part, the patriot movement has been careful to avoid applauding Duke for his actions. But that doesn’t mean they’ve been un-sympathetic. Unlike the mainstream press, the citizen’s media has been correct in pointing out that Duke, himself, was a victim of this tragic event. He was the victim of an economy that has been deliberately engineered to collapse, of a pharmaceutical industry that prescribes dangerous psychotropic drugs, and of a Zionist controlled Hollywood that produces films like V for Vendetta.
Oh, Boy! I just heard a thousand jaws hit the floor as they read the end of that last paragraph. You were all with me about the “economy,” the “pharmaceutical industry,” and maybe even about “Zionist controlled Hollywood.” But many of you were certainly ready to part ways with me for suggesting that there may be something insidious behind one of the patriot movement’s most cherished films.
In terms of cinematic fiction, V for Vendetta has become a cult classic among many patriots. It ranks right up there with 1984 and The Matrix...
For those not familiar with the film, here is the basic premise:
In the near future, Britain is ruled by a totalitarian government under the fascist Norsefire party. Evey Hammond, a young woman who works at the state-run British Television Network, is rescued from an attempted rape perpetrated by members of the secret police by a Guy Fawkes-masked vigilante known as “V”. He leads her to a rooftop to watch his destruction of the Old Bailey. Norsefire tries to explain away the incident as a controlled demolition, claiming the building was no longer structurally sound, but V takes over the state television broadcast the next day, exposing the lie. He urges the people of Britain to rise up against the oppressive government and meet him in one year, on 5 November, outside the House of Parliament Houses, which he promises to destroy.
-----
Christian imagery inserted into 'V For Vendetta' in order to conflate Christianity with villainy-----
Patriots love films that are set in a dystopian future, where ‘lone wolf’ vigilantes take on ‘the system’ and sometimes sacrifice their own lives to inspire future generations to take up the cause from where they left off. Zionist controlled Hollywood understands this, and is more than happy to accommodate. They have their ear to the ground, and are fully aware of the rising patriot movement, and of the vast political awakening that has occurred since 9/11. Not only do they want to cash in on these disenfranchised people, but they also want to win them over to help propagate the Zionist agenda. They realize a revolution is imminent, and they want to make sure that they are instrumental in engineering and controlling that revolution.
If we are to believe that the New World Order is in control of Hollywood, and that they use all mediums to spread their propaganda, then we must be careful to scrutinize every little thing they offer us. Why would the NWO allow a film to be produced that inspires people to challenge their authority? Only the most naïve of us would suggest that this one flew low enough under the radar to escape their scrutiny.
No, this film was produced by the NWO specifically to direct the fear and loathing of its audience against the mythical image of a 4th Reich, and away from any criticism of Jewish power, the Israeli lobby, and the Zionist oppression of the Palestinian people.
-----
Yet more Christian imagery conflated with villainy inserted by Judeofascist propagandists into 'V For Vendetta's cinematography-----
V for Vendetta is rife with Hitler, Nazi, and Holocaust imagery that are intended to further embed into our consciousness that all of our modern fears are entrenched in events that occurred over 65 years ago.
Zionists want to convince you that your fears of a fascist police state are precisely what they were fighting against during WWII. Regardless of what concerns you, Zionist propagandists will find a way to connect it with the Nazis. They are determined to condition you to believe that all evil emanated from Nazi Germany, and that most of the contemporary mechanisms of government control originated from that source. We are to believe that they, alone, are the enemy. They always have been, and they always will be...
This propaganda is relentless. I recently scanned through the TiVo directory on my TV cable box. First, I typed in the keyword, ‘Hitler.’ Over 70 titles came up for programs scheduled over the next two weeks. Here’s a short list: Hitler’s Ghost, When Hitler Invaded America, The Hunt for Hitler, The Fatal Attraction of Adolph Hitler, The Making of Adolph Hitler, and Hitler’s Last Deadly Mission.
Next, I typed in the word, ‘Nazi.’ 74 titles came up. Here’s that short list: Nazi Ghost Train, Nazi UFO Conspiracy, Nazis: The Occult Conspiracy, Nazi Secret Weapons, Nazi Supership, and Hunting Nazis.
Finally, I decided to type in the names of two other famous dictators: ‘Stalin’ and ‘Mao.’ I came up with squat. You know what else I didn’t find? I didn’t find any programs dealing with the USS Liberty, The Lavon affair or Operation Cast Lead. Go figure.
Is it that the American people are just not interested in other historical figures and events, or is it that we are being told what we should be interested in? I think we all know the answer to that. We have been, and continue to be, indoctrinated to only one significant event in history. It is this event, and those characters from that era, that drive the propaganda of the New World Order.
If you are constantly on your guard against Nazism, you become less inclined to criticize Israel...
American Free Press writer Michael Collins Piper explains this best in his book, The New Babylon.
He explains that the NWO is “the intended realization of a Talmudic dream to establish a Jewish utopia.” Their idea of utopia is a “global imperium” that is ruled over by a “Jewish elite.”
The Zionist movement is at the very heart of this realization, which specifically set out to create the state of Israel as a “geographic and political entity.”
Piper states that, “The Zionist cause has been integral to the plan for a New World Order.”
He goes on to explain that, “It was the rise of international Jewish finance, and the consequent emergence of the Rothschild Empire—as a foremost influence in that realm—that is central to advancing the New World Order.”
To paraphrase him further, Piper points out that the consolidation of Rothschild power over the British Empire laid the foundation for the political, financial, and structural framework of the New World Order.
Piper says that the United States today has become “the virtual engine of Rothschild power.” In the Jewish worldview, the United States constitutes, “The New Babylon.” It has become “the seat of power,” and the mechanism whereby which “they want to achieve the New World Order.”
This is the reality of the New World Order. But the makers of V for Vendetta would have you believe otherwise. They accomplish this by introducing Nazi imagery into a contemporary setting, and blending it with modern images of the police state: surveillance cameras, black-clad paramilitary police, etc. By doing so, they propagate the message that the threat of Nazism is still very much alive.
The political party that rules over the people with an iron fist is called Norsefire, alluding to the Nordic/Aryan archetypes and mythology that are alleged to be integral to Nazi ideology.
The colors of the Norsefire party’s flag are black, white and red, and also utilize a perverted cross symbol that is similar to the swastika.
The ‘Chancellor’ of the Norsefire party is an Adolph Hitler clone by the name of Adam Sutler, who delivers impassioned speeches in a Hitler-esque style.
Before being interrogated, the film’s heroine—Evey—is dressed down and has her head shaved. This familiar image of the concentration camp victim stays with her throughout the remainder of the film...
First of all, the film was adapted from a 1982 graphic novel by Alan Moore, a self-described Kabbalist and Chaos Magician who also penned the 1986 graphic novel “Watchmen,” that advocated false-flag terror as a Machiavellian “end justifies the means” scenario that unites the world under a global government following the nuking of a major U.S. city. But Moore actually distanced himself from the film version of V for Vendetta, complaining that the producers changed the “Fascism Vs. Anarchism” theme to “American Conservatism Vs. American Liberalism.”
Then we have Joel Silver and the Wachowski Brothers, all three of whom are powerful Jewish Hollywood producers. The Wachowski Brothers penned the script. They are also the creative force behind another partriot favorite The Matrix, which likewise contained a great deal of Zionist propaganda. For instance, Zion is the subterranean refuge that serves as the only safe place for the unplugged humans to escape from the evil machines.
Then, last but not least, we have Israeli actress Natalie Portman playing the part of the film’s screen heroine, Evey. Now, this may surprise many patriot fans of this movie. Did you know that—at the same time this film was in wide release—Ms. Portman was dating 36-year-old Nat Rothschild? That’s right—Nat Rothschild—from the same Rothschild family that most all of us patriots can agree sits at the very tippy top of the New World Order.
Now, all of these things might seem inoccuous and innocent when weighed individually. But when added together, they make a strong argument for the thesis I’ve set forth...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
Chris Moore comments:
The Zionists/Judeofascists are correct to be fearful of the traditional Christianity of Western Civilization because they realize it is the primary force that kept their murderous, totalitarian machinations and agenda at bay for nearly 2,000 years in the West until they were able to devise Marxism/Bolshevism (the basis for all Communism and Leftism, which murdered millions of Christians in the Soviet Union well prior to the rise of Hitler) to seize the levers of power. Communism failed economically, so they migrated to Zionism, left-liberalism and neoliberalism/neoconservatism, but their murderous, racist, Jewish supremacist totalitarian agenda remains the same.
Only their corrupt accomplices, along with brain-dead liberal rubes, Judeophile liberals, and Judeo-Christian Zionist yokels fall for their propaganda and trickery, or go along with it. Connoisseurs of Christianity and Western Civilization know who the true villains are, and knew that sooner or later their true, snarling, totalitarian faces and agenda would reveal themselves.
Today, the Zionists/Judeofascists are a sinking ship. The beauty is, they're going to take their elite collaborators -- some of the worst, most corrupt, devious, sinister, and subversive elements of society -- straight to the bottom with them, which will provide America and Western Civilization a clean slate to start anew.
The lot of them should start booking passage to the last refuge of scoundrels: Israel.
'The Social Network': case study in how racist Jewry uses media to grind axes and rewrite history, and how its tribalism destroys universal yearnings
From:
How Jewish is The Social Network?
(The Occidental Observer) -- by Matt Parrott --
A recent article in The Jewish Chronicle asks, How Jewish is Facebook?
Very.
The basic idea of Facebook, creating a simple and exclusive alternative to MySpace, isn’t Jewish. But the project was hijacked when the gullible Winklevoss twins entrusted Mark Zuckerberg and his accomplice, Eduardo Saverin, to help execute the project. The movie adaptation of this true story is a fevered Jewish revenge fantasy against their hapless arch-enemies, the reviled WASP “insiders.” Both the book, by Ben Mezrich, and the screenplay, by Aaron Sorkin, wallow in defeating the earnest brothers, heaping these two iconic American Christians with humiliation after humiliation.
The schadenfreud reaches hysterical proportions in this scene where they narrowly lose a rowing competition…
And what did these honest and trusting twins do to deserve this antipathy? Better yet, what did White America do to deserve this antipathy? How, when the President of Harvard himself is a powerful Jewish oligarch who laughed the twins out of his office, can Mezrich see himself, his people, or Zuckerberg as the sympathetic underdogs in this context? It’s simple: he’s Jewish and sympathizes with his own. To ask why he hates them is to make the same mistake the Winklevii made: grasping for a universal honor code in a tribal universe...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
Chris Moore comments:
Diaspora Jewry plays the racist, self-serving, tribal game (even while hoodwinking the Western masses by successfully portraying itself as embracing universal humanist values) better than any tribe ever has and likely ever will; it’s got thousands of years of experience under its belt in this area. Indeed, Jewry’s tribalism is one of the reasons it hates non-racist Christianity so much (that, and Christian doctrine has successfully revealed and communicated Jewry for what it truly is to the masses).
Whites anxious about the future of their race need only embrace the traditional, “anti-Semitic” (actually, anti-Judeofascist) Christianity that is the touchstone of Western Civilization; the rest, in time, will take care of itself. How? Supremacist Jewry is the linchpin of the totalitarian, neo-Marxist, atheist-materialist war against Whites, Christians, Western Civilization and human freedom. Expose it for its true nature, and drive it out of Western Civilization into its own tribal, racist realm where it belongs (the Levant) and everything else falls into place.
Emulating ignoble, dishonorable, totalitarian and insanely racist and greedy Jewry to try to defeat it is exactly the wrong thing to do; it plays that game better than anyone.
I think what is engendering frustration and decline amongst Whites is that they are increasingly being forced by Zionist-occupied government and Jewish-invented ideological Marxism and its various offshoots (left-liberalism, neoconservatism/neoliberalism) to play with one hand tied behind their backs. Christianity, or more specifically, a return to private Christian moral authority across society accompanied with the elimination of Big Government and its anti-Christian totalitarianism, would level the playing field once and for all.
How Jewish is The Social Network?
(The Occidental Observer) -- by Matt Parrott --
A recent article in The Jewish Chronicle asks, How Jewish is Facebook?
Very.
The basic idea of Facebook, creating a simple and exclusive alternative to MySpace, isn’t Jewish. But the project was hijacked when the gullible Winklevoss twins entrusted Mark Zuckerberg and his accomplice, Eduardo Saverin, to help execute the project. The movie adaptation of this true story is a fevered Jewish revenge fantasy against their hapless arch-enemies, the reviled WASP “insiders.” Both the book, by Ben Mezrich, and the screenplay, by Aaron Sorkin, wallow in defeating the earnest brothers, heaping these two iconic American Christians with humiliation after humiliation.
The schadenfreud reaches hysterical proportions in this scene where they narrowly lose a rowing competition…
And what did these honest and trusting twins do to deserve this antipathy? Better yet, what did White America do to deserve this antipathy? How, when the President of Harvard himself is a powerful Jewish oligarch who laughed the twins out of his office, can Mezrich see himself, his people, or Zuckerberg as the sympathetic underdogs in this context? It’s simple: he’s Jewish and sympathizes with his own. To ask why he hates them is to make the same mistake the Winklevii made: grasping for a universal honor code in a tribal universe...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
Chris Moore comments:
Diaspora Jewry plays the racist, self-serving, tribal game (even while hoodwinking the Western masses by successfully portraying itself as embracing universal humanist values) better than any tribe ever has and likely ever will; it’s got thousands of years of experience under its belt in this area. Indeed, Jewry’s tribalism is one of the reasons it hates non-racist Christianity so much (that, and Christian doctrine has successfully revealed and communicated Jewry for what it truly is to the masses).
Whites anxious about the future of their race need only embrace the traditional, “anti-Semitic” (actually, anti-Judeofascist) Christianity that is the touchstone of Western Civilization; the rest, in time, will take care of itself. How? Supremacist Jewry is the linchpin of the totalitarian, neo-Marxist, atheist-materialist war against Whites, Christians, Western Civilization and human freedom. Expose it for its true nature, and drive it out of Western Civilization into its own tribal, racist realm where it belongs (the Levant) and everything else falls into place.
Emulating ignoble, dishonorable, totalitarian and insanely racist and greedy Jewry to try to defeat it is exactly the wrong thing to do; it plays that game better than anyone.
Matt Parrott [in comments]: I’m not claiming that we should abandon our honor codes, only that we should recognize that while they might be universal in an abstract or theological sense, they’re certainly not universally recognized or reciprocated.That’s just it: Christianity imposes honor codes, and forces those who want to participate in Western Civilization to play honorably and not in an underhanded, back-stabbing, subversive, tribalistic manner, (which is the standard modus operandi of racist Jewry — yet another reason it hates Christianity).
I think what is engendering frustration and decline amongst Whites is that they are increasingly being forced by Zionist-occupied government and Jewish-invented ideological Marxism and its various offshoots (left-liberalism, neoconservatism/neoliberalism) to play with one hand tied behind their backs. Christianity, or more specifically, a return to private Christian moral authority across society accompanied with the elimination of Big Government and its anti-Christian totalitarianism, would level the playing field once and for all.
Wednesday, January 05, 2011
Destroyed for telling truth about Jewish media, “enlightened” Rick Sanchez rushes into arms of Jewish supremacists for salvation
From:
The rehabilitation of Rich Sanchez: Jews to the rescue
(Occidental Obsrver) -- by Kevin MacDonald --
The rehabilitation of Rick Sanchez is in full swing. A public dialog with celebrity rabbi Schmuley Boteach is scheduled for Jan. 13. Boteach was ordained as a follower of Menachem Schneerson, the putative Chabad Lubavitcher messiah who famously claimed that Jews were an entirely different species from other humans: “We do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather we have a case of . . . a totally different species. . . . The body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world . . . The difference of the inner quality [of the body] . . . is so great that the bodies would be considered as completely different species. (In I. Shahak and N. Mezvinsky, Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel, pp. 59–60.)
Boteach is famous for his ”Jewish values network” which aims to “to disseminate Jewish Values [with a capital 'V'] to the mainstream American public through every avenue of the media, and to bring the teachings of the Torah to the masses, making Judaism a light to the world.”
High on Boteach’s list of Jewish values is ethnic cleansing–which fits well with the clear message of the Old Testament. In a HuffPo article “A spiritual night in Hebron” he enthuses about the wonderful camaraderie among the settlers who are “liberated from hatred,” their only desire is “to walk in the footsteps of Abraham.” A blogger at Haaretz links to him as a “pro-occupation flack.” Boteach is one of those Jews about whom you wonder, “Is it deception or self-deception.” Take your pick.
Sanchez’s comeback is being engineered by Ronn Torossian, a pro-Israel activist P.R. person who is a caricature of a certain type of Jewish personality. Torossian has represented Israeli officials as well as pro-Israel forces in the U.S., including Christian evangelicals Pat Crouch (founder of Trinity Broadcasting), Pat Robertson, and Morton Klein, head of the Zionist Association of America. His Wikipedia page says he “is known for his aggressive and self-promotional style of both his clients and his firm,” and his NYTimes profile is titled “Brash P. R. guy grabs cliens, ink.” The article describes him as “brash and aggressively outspoken, [he] is the consummate scrappy publicist.” He has no formal training; just street smarts, his personality, and his Jewish connections.
So Sanchez is in good hands. I suspect a quid pro quo: When Sanchez gets reestablished, he will be gung ho pro-Israel–a useful media asset at a time when the ethnic cleansers are on the defensive. Fox News would be a good fit...LINK
-------------------------
Chris Moore comments:
Gentile acquiescence and collaboration with Jewish supremacism, whether by Judeophile liberals on the Left, Judeo Christian Zionists on the Right, or just plain careerists like Rick Sanchez, is truly the last refuge of scoundrels. I hope they enjoy their worldly "salvation" while it lasts, because the clock is ticking on those soulless bastards, and they seem to know it.
Deals with the devil never pay in the long run, but Sanchez and those like him have made their choice. It's called "free will" for a reason...
The rehabilitation of Rich Sanchez: Jews to the rescue
(Occidental Obsrver) -- by Kevin MacDonald --
The rehabilitation of Rick Sanchez is in full swing. A public dialog with celebrity rabbi Schmuley Boteach is scheduled for Jan. 13. Boteach was ordained as a follower of Menachem Schneerson, the putative Chabad Lubavitcher messiah who famously claimed that Jews were an entirely different species from other humans: “We do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather we have a case of . . . a totally different species. . . . The body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world . . . The difference of the inner quality [of the body] . . . is so great that the bodies would be considered as completely different species. (In I. Shahak and N. Mezvinsky, Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel, pp. 59–60.)
Boteach is famous for his ”Jewish values network” which aims to “to disseminate Jewish Values [with a capital 'V'] to the mainstream American public through every avenue of the media, and to bring the teachings of the Torah to the masses, making Judaism a light to the world.”
High on Boteach’s list of Jewish values is ethnic cleansing–which fits well with the clear message of the Old Testament. In a HuffPo article “A spiritual night in Hebron” he enthuses about the wonderful camaraderie among the settlers who are “liberated from hatred,” their only desire is “to walk in the footsteps of Abraham.” A blogger at Haaretz links to him as a “pro-occupation flack.” Boteach is one of those Jews about whom you wonder, “Is it deception or self-deception.” Take your pick.
Sanchez’s comeback is being engineered by Ronn Torossian, a pro-Israel activist P.R. person who is a caricature of a certain type of Jewish personality. Torossian has represented Israeli officials as well as pro-Israel forces in the U.S., including Christian evangelicals Pat Crouch (founder of Trinity Broadcasting), Pat Robertson, and Morton Klein, head of the Zionist Association of America. His Wikipedia page says he “is known for his aggressive and self-promotional style of both his clients and his firm,” and his NYTimes profile is titled “Brash P. R. guy grabs cliens, ink.” The article describes him as “brash and aggressively outspoken, [he] is the consummate scrappy publicist.” He has no formal training; just street smarts, his personality, and his Jewish connections.
So Sanchez is in good hands. I suspect a quid pro quo: When Sanchez gets reestablished, he will be gung ho pro-Israel–a useful media asset at a time when the ethnic cleansers are on the defensive. Fox News would be a good fit...LINK
-------------------------
Chris Moore comments:
Gentile acquiescence and collaboration with Jewish supremacism, whether by Judeophile liberals on the Left, Judeo Christian Zionists on the Right, or just plain careerists like Rick Sanchez, is truly the last refuge of scoundrels. I hope they enjoy their worldly "salvation" while it lasts, because the clock is ticking on those soulless bastards, and they seem to know it.
Deals with the devil never pay in the long run, but Sanchez and those like him have made their choice. It's called "free will" for a reason...
Tuesday, January 04, 2011
Jewish Zionist Congressman Henry Waxman protects criminal Jewish network that defrauded U.S. Army
From:
Arms Merchants of South Central
Did the rich and intrigue-filled Botach family get a pass from Henry Waxman?
(LA Weekly) -- by Penn Bullock --
The Botach family of Los Angeles is among the more unusual of the very rich. Yoav Botach is a wealthy landlord. He founded, and his son now owns, an arms dealership in an unsettling locale for one: South Central. And his grandson was convicted of conspiracy for peddling to the U.S. Army decomposing ammunition — so old that it was traced to the factories of Mao Tse-tung — as part of a $300 million contract to arm the Afghan government.
But what is also startling in the weird saga of this prominent L.A. family is the silence of Congressman Henry Waxman of Beverly Hills, who led a congressional investigation into the ammo fraud and vowed to get to the bottom of it.
As Waxman said, his inquiry in 2008 aimed to answer a fundamental question: How did Botach's inexperienced 21-year-old grandson Efraim Diveroli "get a sensitive, $300 million contract to supply ammunition to Afghan forces?"
Two years later, Waxman refuses to speak about it with L.A. Weekly. But with an ugly palimony suit simmering in L.A. between family patriarch Botach and his common-law wife, Judith Boteach, she's now talking. And she points to a contract that may link the South Central arms firm run by Botach's son, Bar-Kochba Botach, to the grandson's disgraced firm, AEY Inc., in Miami Beach...
Waxman's silence on Diveroli's fleecing of the Army comes as the palimony case between Boteach and Botach plays out, from Los Angeles to Israel.
In March 2006, the State of Israel accused Botach's brother and business partner in L.A., Shlomo Botach, of "using professional money launderers" to transfer $860,000 from the U.S. through Swiss and Uruguayan banks to an account in Israel, code-named "Ezra 26." The court case covered transfers totaling $331,000.
In court documents translated from Hebrew for the Weekly, Shlomo stated he was moving the money to Israel so that Judith Boteach couldn't access it during the palimony dispute.
But the State of Israel alleged that the money was wired in small batches so that it could be slipped past authorities...
It may be that L.A. politicians worry about their relationships with wealthy arms merchants and landowners. In 2006, the L.A. Daily News reported that Botach co-owns the South Central arms firm — and 144 commercial properties across L.A.
"Some are restaurants, garages, buildings where they manufacture clothes," Boteach says. "A lot of them are small businesses, and some are apartment buildings."
She says that Botach lives in Waxman's 30th Congressional District, and that her estranged husband wields influence with politicians. "[Yoav] supports a lot of the City Council members and the governor. There were special lunches, dinners and fund-raisers."
The connections could be seen last year, when Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and City Council President Eric Garcetti attended the Beverly Hills launch of the star-studded charity Turn Friday Night Into Family Night, founded by Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, the former spiritual adviser to Michael Jackson...MORE...LINK
------------------------
Democrat U.S. Rep. Henry Waxman of Beverly Hills: running interference for Jewish organized crime preying upon U.S. government, no less?
Arms Merchants of South Central
Did the rich and intrigue-filled Botach family get a pass from Henry Waxman?
(LA Weekly) -- by Penn Bullock --
The Botach family of Los Angeles is among the more unusual of the very rich. Yoav Botach is a wealthy landlord. He founded, and his son now owns, an arms dealership in an unsettling locale for one: South Central. And his grandson was convicted of conspiracy for peddling to the U.S. Army decomposing ammunition — so old that it was traced to the factories of Mao Tse-tung — as part of a $300 million contract to arm the Afghan government.
But what is also startling in the weird saga of this prominent L.A. family is the silence of Congressman Henry Waxman of Beverly Hills, who led a congressional investigation into the ammo fraud and vowed to get to the bottom of it.
As Waxman said, his inquiry in 2008 aimed to answer a fundamental question: How did Botach's inexperienced 21-year-old grandson Efraim Diveroli "get a sensitive, $300 million contract to supply ammunition to Afghan forces?"
Two years later, Waxman refuses to speak about it with L.A. Weekly. But with an ugly palimony suit simmering in L.A. between family patriarch Botach and his common-law wife, Judith Boteach, she's now talking. And she points to a contract that may link the South Central arms firm run by Botach's son, Bar-Kochba Botach, to the grandson's disgraced firm, AEY Inc., in Miami Beach...
Waxman's silence on Diveroli's fleecing of the Army comes as the palimony case between Boteach and Botach plays out, from Los Angeles to Israel.
In March 2006, the State of Israel accused Botach's brother and business partner in L.A., Shlomo Botach, of "using professional money launderers" to transfer $860,000 from the U.S. through Swiss and Uruguayan banks to an account in Israel, code-named "Ezra 26." The court case covered transfers totaling $331,000.
In court documents translated from Hebrew for the Weekly, Shlomo stated he was moving the money to Israel so that Judith Boteach couldn't access it during the palimony dispute.
But the State of Israel alleged that the money was wired in small batches so that it could be slipped past authorities...
It may be that L.A. politicians worry about their relationships with wealthy arms merchants and landowners. In 2006, the L.A. Daily News reported that Botach co-owns the South Central arms firm — and 144 commercial properties across L.A.
"Some are restaurants, garages, buildings where they manufacture clothes," Boteach says. "A lot of them are small businesses, and some are apartment buildings."
She says that Botach lives in Waxman's 30th Congressional District, and that her estranged husband wields influence with politicians. "[Yoav] supports a lot of the City Council members and the governor. There were special lunches, dinners and fund-raisers."
The connections could be seen last year, when Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and City Council President Eric Garcetti attended the Beverly Hills launch of the star-studded charity Turn Friday Night Into Family Night, founded by Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, the former spiritual adviser to Michael Jackson...MORE...LINK
------------------------
Democrat U.S. Rep. Henry Waxman of Beverly Hills: running interference for Jewish organized crime preying upon U.S. government, no less?
Diaspoa Jewry's left-wing leanings driven by tribal economic self-interest, hatred of Christianity, not dedication to universalism
From:
Milton Friedman’s ‘Capitalism and the Jews’ Revisited
(gilad.co.uk) -- by Gilad Atzmon --
“there are few peoples if any in the world who owe so great a debt to free enterprise and competitive capitalism as the Jews.“
“there are few peoples or any in the world who have done so much to undermine the intellectual foundation of capitalism as the Jews.” (Milton Friedman)
Given the severity and uncertainty of the economic crisis we are all experiencing, I suggest we look once more at the work of Milton Friedman, the leading economist and a staunch advocate of hard capitalism.
During the 1960s -80s Friedman was regarded by many academics, politicians and world leaders as the most important post-World War Two economist. Friedman was chief economic advisor to Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher and Menachem Begin. He also went on record advising the Chilean military dictator Augusto Pinochet.
It is far from surprising to note that more and more commentators have realised in recent years that it was Friedman’s ideology and advocacy of free enterprise, zero governmental intervention and privatisation that has led to the current financial turmoil. It was Milton Friedman’s philosophy that also contributed to the transformation of the West into a service economy.
But Friedman wasn’t just an economist: he was also a devout Zionist and a very proud Jew. Friedman was interested in the role of the Jews in world finance and politics. He also attempted to analyse and understand the attitude of Jews towards wealth. In 1972 Friedman spoke to The Mont Pelerin Society about “Capitalism and the Jews”. In 1978 he repeated the same talk, addressing Jewish students at the Chicago University’s Hillel institute.
I’d suggest that Friedman deserves our immediate attention, since he contributed to the rise of an ideology and school of thought that bears some responsibility for the rearrangement (some might say dismantling ) of the West’s economy...
Friedman, clearly prefers competition. According to him “the market is color blind. No one who goes to the market to buy bread knows or cares whether the wheat was grown by a Jew, Catholic, Protestant, Muslim, or atheist; by whites or blacks.”
Friedman’s elaborates further: “Any miller who wishes to express his personal prejudices by buying only from preferred groups is at a competitive disadvantage, since he is keeping himself from buying from the cheapest source. He can express his prejudice, but he will have to do so at his own expense, accepting a lower monetary income than he could otherwise earn.”
“Jews” Friedman continues, “have flourished most in those countries in which competitive capitalism had the greatest scope: Holland in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and Britain and the U.S. in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Germany in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century.”...
Yet, Friedman is also genuinely intrigued by Jewish intellectuals’ affinity with anti-Capitalism : “Jews have been a stronghold of anti-capitalist sentiment. From Karl Marx through Leon Trotsky to Herbert Marcuse, a sizable fraction of the revolutionary anti-capitalist literature has been authored by Jews.”
How could that be, Friedman wonders? Why is it that, despite the historical record of the benefits of competitive capitalism to the Jews; despite the intellectual explanation of this phenomenon that is implicit or explicit in much liberal literature from at least Adam Smith onwards, the Jews have been disproportionately anti-capitalist?
Friedman considers some answers –
Rather often we hear from Jews on the left that their affinity to humanitarian issues is driven by their ‘Jewish humanist heritage’. More than once I myself have commented that this is an utter lie. There is no such a Jewish heritage. Driven by tribal precepts, both Judaism and ‘Jewish ideology’ are devoid of universal ethics. If there are some remote patches of humanism in Jewish culture, these are certainly far from being universal.
Friedman, however, offered a further take on the subject: In direct reference to Lawrence Fuchs who argues that the anti-capitalism of the Jews is a “direct reflection of values derived from the Jewish religion and culture,” Friedman wonders – if Jewish culture is, indeed, inherently anti capitalist (as Fuchs suggests) how is it then, that Jews failed to successfully combat Capitalism and free markets throughout their history? Friedman analyses that whilst “Jewish religion and culture date back over two millennia; the Jewish opposition to capitalism and attachment to socialism, is at the most, less than two centuries.”
Being a sharp intellect then, Friedman managed to dismantle Fuchs’s argument. He managed to counter the argument that Jewish culture is inherently socialist or humanist. If Judaism is, indeed, inherently and innately bound to such ethics, how is it that this humanism failed to become dominant throughout Jewish history?...
Friedman seems to dismiss the presumed ‘intellectual honesty’ behind Jewish affiliation with the left and anti capitalism: He tends to argue that the Jewish intellectual inclination towards the left is a direct outcome of some political and historical circumstances, rather than ethical or ideological choice. He explains that, in his view, Jewish affiliation with the left is the product of a particular occurrence in Europe in the nineteenth century.
“Beginning with the era of the French revolution, the European political spectrum became divided into a “Left” and a “Right” along an axis that involved the issue of secularism. The Right (conservative, Monarchical, “clerical”) maintained that there must be a place for the church in the public order; the left (democratic, liberal, radical) held that there can be no Church at all . . . .”
It was only natural, then, for the Jews to join the left – in fact Jews could only join the left.
“The axis separating left from right also formed a natural boundary for the pale of Jewish political participation. It was the left, with its new secular concept of citizenship, that had accomplished the Emancipation, and it was only the left that could see a place for the Jews in public life.”
Such a reasoning, then, views Jewish affiliation with the left as a politically opportunistic move instead of a form of ‘moral awakening’.
Such a reading of the ‘Jewish left’ reaffirms my own critical assessment. It also explains why some Jews join the left – they support cosmopolitanism, solidarity, an international working class; and yet, they themselves often seem to prefer to operate within ‘Jews only’ racially orientated cells such as the Bund, Jewish Socialists or even Jews For Boycott of Israeli Goods. Friedman’s reasoning might also explain why so many Jews who had their roots in the so- called ‘left’, ended up preaching moral interventionism and Neo Conservatism.(4)
Friedman argues also, that Jewish affiliation with the left might be better understood as an attempt to disown some anti Semitic stereotypes of the Jew as being “a merchant or moneylender who put commercial interests ahead of human values.”
According to Friedman, the Jewish anti capitalist is there to prove that, far from being money-grabbing, selfish and heartless, Jews are really public spirited, generous, and concerned with ideals rather than material goods. “How better to do so than to attack the market with its reliance on monetary values and impersonal transactions and to glorify the political process, to take as an ideal a state run by well-meaning people for the benefit of their fellow men?”
And yet, in Friedman’s logic then, it is not a ‘moral awakening’ that moves the Jew to the left; it is neither humanism, nor solidarity and nor is it kindness, but, instead, it seems to be a desperate attempt to replace or amend the Jewish image.
Surprisingly enough, I find myself in total agreement with Friedman, though I would phrase it differently. I do differentiate between ‘the leftist who happen to be Jewish’- an innocent category inspired by humanism, and ‘the Jewish leftist- which seems to me to be a contradiction in terms, for the left aims to universally transcends itself beyond ethnicity, religion or race. Clearly ‘Jewish left’ is there to maintain a Jewish tribal ethno-centric identity at the heart of working class philosophy. ‘Jewish left’ is there to primarily serve Jewish interests...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
Chris Moore comments:
The bulk and thrust of diaspora Jewry is indeed driven by fraudulent "humanist" and "universalist" values. The truth is, Jewry has little good will toward the entirety of humanity, but operates in a nearly entirely self-serving manner.
And authoritarian Big Government, far from being universal, is indeed set up to serve particularistic interests -- the particularistic interests of those pulling its strings and using the resources of the entirety of society via taxation and a monopoly on violence to impose its particularistic will upon everyone. Indeed, that's why Jewry "invented" Communism: to steal Christianity's universalist thunder, to order society into an authoritarian, top-down framework that Jewry could control, and to use its domination of Big Government to force the state and citizenry to do Jewry's bidding and pursue its agenda.
Far from being an anti-Semite, Marx, along with his tutor, Jewish Zionist Moses Hess, were the brains behind this satanic leviathan agenda. Jewish Bolsheviks implemented this agenda for many years in the early Soviet Union, and, possibly recognizing their ultimate, self-serving goal of racist, hegemonic domination, Stalin put an end to their scheme out of his own ruthless self-interest via the "anti-semitic" purges.
Hence, Jewry eventually turned to unbridled state-capitalism (neoconservatism/neoliberalism) to pursue its racist drive towards tyrranical domination, nesting within the U.S. government, U.S. think tanks, and U.S. corporations (many state connected) to this very day in order to manipulate America towards backing their desired Zionist (Jewish supremacist) ends, and dominating the Democratic Party and the neoconservative Big Government Right along the way to do so.
Milton Friedman’s ‘Capitalism and the Jews’ Revisited
(gilad.co.uk) -- by Gilad Atzmon --
“there are few peoples if any in the world who owe so great a debt to free enterprise and competitive capitalism as the Jews.“
“there are few peoples or any in the world who have done so much to undermine the intellectual foundation of capitalism as the Jews.” (Milton Friedman)
Given the severity and uncertainty of the economic crisis we are all experiencing, I suggest we look once more at the work of Milton Friedman, the leading economist and a staunch advocate of hard capitalism.
During the 1960s -80s Friedman was regarded by many academics, politicians and world leaders as the most important post-World War Two economist. Friedman was chief economic advisor to Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher and Menachem Begin. He also went on record advising the Chilean military dictator Augusto Pinochet.
It is far from surprising to note that more and more commentators have realised in recent years that it was Friedman’s ideology and advocacy of free enterprise, zero governmental intervention and privatisation that has led to the current financial turmoil. It was Milton Friedman’s philosophy that also contributed to the transformation of the West into a service economy.
But Friedman wasn’t just an economist: he was also a devout Zionist and a very proud Jew. Friedman was interested in the role of the Jews in world finance and politics. He also attempted to analyse and understand the attitude of Jews towards wealth. In 1972 Friedman spoke to The Mont Pelerin Society about “Capitalism and the Jews”. In 1978 he repeated the same talk, addressing Jewish students at the Chicago University’s Hillel institute.
I’d suggest that Friedman deserves our immediate attention, since he contributed to the rise of an ideology and school of thought that bears some responsibility for the rearrangement (some might say dismantling ) of the West’s economy...
Friedman, clearly prefers competition. According to him “the market is color blind. No one who goes to the market to buy bread knows or cares whether the wheat was grown by a Jew, Catholic, Protestant, Muslim, or atheist; by whites or blacks.”
Friedman’s elaborates further: “Any miller who wishes to express his personal prejudices by buying only from preferred groups is at a competitive disadvantage, since he is keeping himself from buying from the cheapest source. He can express his prejudice, but he will have to do so at his own expense, accepting a lower monetary income than he could otherwise earn.”
“Jews” Friedman continues, “have flourished most in those countries in which competitive capitalism had the greatest scope: Holland in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and Britain and the U.S. in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Germany in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century.”...
Yet, Friedman is also genuinely intrigued by Jewish intellectuals’ affinity with anti-Capitalism : “Jews have been a stronghold of anti-capitalist sentiment. From Karl Marx through Leon Trotsky to Herbert Marcuse, a sizable fraction of the revolutionary anti-capitalist literature has been authored by Jews.”
How could that be, Friedman wonders? Why is it that, despite the historical record of the benefits of competitive capitalism to the Jews; despite the intellectual explanation of this phenomenon that is implicit or explicit in much liberal literature from at least Adam Smith onwards, the Jews have been disproportionately anti-capitalist?
Friedman considers some answers –
Rather often we hear from Jews on the left that their affinity to humanitarian issues is driven by their ‘Jewish humanist heritage’. More than once I myself have commented that this is an utter lie. There is no such a Jewish heritage. Driven by tribal precepts, both Judaism and ‘Jewish ideology’ are devoid of universal ethics. If there are some remote patches of humanism in Jewish culture, these are certainly far from being universal.
Friedman, however, offered a further take on the subject: In direct reference to Lawrence Fuchs who argues that the anti-capitalism of the Jews is a “direct reflection of values derived from the Jewish religion and culture,” Friedman wonders – if Jewish culture is, indeed, inherently anti capitalist (as Fuchs suggests) how is it then, that Jews failed to successfully combat Capitalism and free markets throughout their history? Friedman analyses that whilst “Jewish religion and culture date back over two millennia; the Jewish opposition to capitalism and attachment to socialism, is at the most, less than two centuries.”
Being a sharp intellect then, Friedman managed to dismantle Fuchs’s argument. He managed to counter the argument that Jewish culture is inherently socialist or humanist. If Judaism is, indeed, inherently and innately bound to such ethics, how is it that this humanism failed to become dominant throughout Jewish history?...
Friedman seems to dismiss the presumed ‘intellectual honesty’ behind Jewish affiliation with the left and anti capitalism: He tends to argue that the Jewish intellectual inclination towards the left is a direct outcome of some political and historical circumstances, rather than ethical or ideological choice. He explains that, in his view, Jewish affiliation with the left is the product of a particular occurrence in Europe in the nineteenth century.
“Beginning with the era of the French revolution, the European political spectrum became divided into a “Left” and a “Right” along an axis that involved the issue of secularism. The Right (conservative, Monarchical, “clerical”) maintained that there must be a place for the church in the public order; the left (democratic, liberal, radical) held that there can be no Church at all . . . .”
It was only natural, then, for the Jews to join the left – in fact Jews could only join the left.
“The axis separating left from right also formed a natural boundary for the pale of Jewish political participation. It was the left, with its new secular concept of citizenship, that had accomplished the Emancipation, and it was only the left that could see a place for the Jews in public life.”
Such a reasoning, then, views Jewish affiliation with the left as a politically opportunistic move instead of a form of ‘moral awakening’.
Such a reading of the ‘Jewish left’ reaffirms my own critical assessment. It also explains why some Jews join the left – they support cosmopolitanism, solidarity, an international working class; and yet, they themselves often seem to prefer to operate within ‘Jews only’ racially orientated cells such as the Bund, Jewish Socialists or even Jews For Boycott of Israeli Goods. Friedman’s reasoning might also explain why so many Jews who had their roots in the so- called ‘left’, ended up preaching moral interventionism and Neo Conservatism.(4)
Friedman argues also, that Jewish affiliation with the left might be better understood as an attempt to disown some anti Semitic stereotypes of the Jew as being “a merchant or moneylender who put commercial interests ahead of human values.”
According to Friedman, the Jewish anti capitalist is there to prove that, far from being money-grabbing, selfish and heartless, Jews are really public spirited, generous, and concerned with ideals rather than material goods. “How better to do so than to attack the market with its reliance on monetary values and impersonal transactions and to glorify the political process, to take as an ideal a state run by well-meaning people for the benefit of their fellow men?”
And yet, in Friedman’s logic then, it is not a ‘moral awakening’ that moves the Jew to the left; it is neither humanism, nor solidarity and nor is it kindness, but, instead, it seems to be a desperate attempt to replace or amend the Jewish image.
Surprisingly enough, I find myself in total agreement with Friedman, though I would phrase it differently. I do differentiate between ‘the leftist who happen to be Jewish’- an innocent category inspired by humanism, and ‘the Jewish leftist- which seems to me to be a contradiction in terms, for the left aims to universally transcends itself beyond ethnicity, religion or race. Clearly ‘Jewish left’ is there to maintain a Jewish tribal ethno-centric identity at the heart of working class philosophy. ‘Jewish left’ is there to primarily serve Jewish interests...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
Chris Moore comments:
The bulk and thrust of diaspora Jewry is indeed driven by fraudulent "humanist" and "universalist" values. The truth is, Jewry has little good will toward the entirety of humanity, but operates in a nearly entirely self-serving manner.
And authoritarian Big Government, far from being universal, is indeed set up to serve particularistic interests -- the particularistic interests of those pulling its strings and using the resources of the entirety of society via taxation and a monopoly on violence to impose its particularistic will upon everyone. Indeed, that's why Jewry "invented" Communism: to steal Christianity's universalist thunder, to order society into an authoritarian, top-down framework that Jewry could control, and to use its domination of Big Government to force the state and citizenry to do Jewry's bidding and pursue its agenda.
Far from being an anti-Semite, Marx, along with his tutor, Jewish Zionist Moses Hess, were the brains behind this satanic leviathan agenda. Jewish Bolsheviks implemented this agenda for many years in the early Soviet Union, and, possibly recognizing their ultimate, self-serving goal of racist, hegemonic domination, Stalin put an end to their scheme out of his own ruthless self-interest via the "anti-semitic" purges.
Hence, Jewry eventually turned to unbridled state-capitalism (neoconservatism/neoliberalism) to pursue its racist drive towards tyrranical domination, nesting within the U.S. government, U.S. think tanks, and U.S. corporations (many state connected) to this very day in order to manipulate America towards backing their desired Zionist (Jewish supremacist) ends, and dominating the Democratic Party and the neoconservative Big Government Right along the way to do so.
Sociopath Soros works towards vision of international bankster elite ruling world government, but is a little too blatant for his partners in crime
From:
George Soros: The United States Must Stop Resisting The Orderly Decline Of The Dollar, The Coming Global Currency And The New World Order
(The Economic Collapse blog) --
In the video you are about to see, George Soros talks about "the creation of a New World Order", he discusses the need for a "managed decline" of the U.S. dollar and he talks at length of the global need for a true world currency. So just who is George Soros? Well, he is a billionaire "philanthropist" who came to be known as "the Man Who Broke the Bank of England" when he raked in a staggering one billion dollars during the 1992 "Black Wednesday" currency crisis. These days Soros is most famous for being perhaps the most "politically active" (at least openly) billionaire in the world. His Open Society Institute is in more than 60 countries and it spends approximately $600 million a year promoting the ideals that Soros wants promoted. Soros and his pet organizations have played a key role in quite a few "revolutions" around the globe over the last several decades, but these days the main goal of George Soros is to bring political change to the United States.
So exactly what is it that George Soros is trying to accomplish? Well, in a nutshell, what he wants is a Big Brother-style one world government based on extreme European-style socialism, strict population control and the radical green agenda. It would be a world where the state tightly regulates everything that we do for the greater benefit of the environment and of society as a whole.
However, Soros is not the "mastermind of the New World Order" that some have tried to make him out to be. The truth is that to those in the international banking elite, Soros is considered to be something of a "black sheep" and an "outsider". Much of what Soros is trying to accomplish lines up with the goals of the international banking elite, but what they don't like is that Soros won't stop publicly talking about a global currency and a "New World Order". Of course the international banking elite very much want a global currency and a "New World Order", but what they don't need is a "squeaky wheel" like Soros running around drawing unneeded attention to those goals.
Also, Soros does not seem to understand that both sides of the political spectrum in the United States are deeply influenced by the international banking elite. Sadly, the truth is that the same handful of elitist organizations has dominated the cabinets of every single president that we have had since World War II. If you doubt this, just check out how many members of each presidential administration over the last 40 years have belonged to either the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission or the Bilderberg Group. If you have never looked into this before, you will be absolutely shocked. No matter what president we elect, it is always the exact same organizations that always dominate their cabinets.
But Soros still seems very much trapped within the left/right paradigm and he seems absolutely obsessed with destroying the Republican Party. For example, Soros spent an insane amount of money attempting to defeat George W. Bush back in 2004. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, George Soros donated $23,581,000 during that election cycle to political organizations that were trying to keep Bush from being reelected.
Soros has also been a tremendous backer of Barack Obama, although lately Soros seems a bit disenchanted with him. Through organizations such as the Center for American Progress and MoveOn.org, Soros is constantly trying to influence the state of American politics.
So what is George Soros thinking about these days? Well, in the video posted below you will see Soros discussing "an orderly decline" of the U.S. dollar, the coming global currency and the importance of the New World Order...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
George Soros: The United States Must Stop Resisting The Orderly Decline Of The Dollar, The Coming Global Currency And The New World Order
(The Economic Collapse blog) --
In the video you are about to see, George Soros talks about "the creation of a New World Order", he discusses the need for a "managed decline" of the U.S. dollar and he talks at length of the global need for a true world currency. So just who is George Soros? Well, he is a billionaire "philanthropist" who came to be known as "the Man Who Broke the Bank of England" when he raked in a staggering one billion dollars during the 1992 "Black Wednesday" currency crisis. These days Soros is most famous for being perhaps the most "politically active" (at least openly) billionaire in the world. His Open Society Institute is in more than 60 countries and it spends approximately $600 million a year promoting the ideals that Soros wants promoted. Soros and his pet organizations have played a key role in quite a few "revolutions" around the globe over the last several decades, but these days the main goal of George Soros is to bring political change to the United States.
So exactly what is it that George Soros is trying to accomplish? Well, in a nutshell, what he wants is a Big Brother-style one world government based on extreme European-style socialism, strict population control and the radical green agenda. It would be a world where the state tightly regulates everything that we do for the greater benefit of the environment and of society as a whole.
However, Soros is not the "mastermind of the New World Order" that some have tried to make him out to be. The truth is that to those in the international banking elite, Soros is considered to be something of a "black sheep" and an "outsider". Much of what Soros is trying to accomplish lines up with the goals of the international banking elite, but what they don't like is that Soros won't stop publicly talking about a global currency and a "New World Order". Of course the international banking elite very much want a global currency and a "New World Order", but what they don't need is a "squeaky wheel" like Soros running around drawing unneeded attention to those goals.
Also, Soros does not seem to understand that both sides of the political spectrum in the United States are deeply influenced by the international banking elite. Sadly, the truth is that the same handful of elitist organizations has dominated the cabinets of every single president that we have had since World War II. If you doubt this, just check out how many members of each presidential administration over the last 40 years have belonged to either the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission or the Bilderberg Group. If you have never looked into this before, you will be absolutely shocked. No matter what president we elect, it is always the exact same organizations that always dominate their cabinets.
But Soros still seems very much trapped within the left/right paradigm and he seems absolutely obsessed with destroying the Republican Party. For example, Soros spent an insane amount of money attempting to defeat George W. Bush back in 2004. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, George Soros donated $23,581,000 during that election cycle to political organizations that were trying to keep Bush from being reelected.
Soros has also been a tremendous backer of Barack Obama, although lately Soros seems a bit disenchanted with him. Through organizations such as the Center for American Progress and MoveOn.org, Soros is constantly trying to influence the state of American politics.
So what is George Soros thinking about these days? Well, in the video posted below you will see Soros discussing "an orderly decline" of the U.S. dollar, the coming global currency and the importance of the New World Order...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
Monday, January 03, 2011
The lethally hypocritical Judith Miller, case study in why it's crucial for American patriots to distrust ideological Zionists and mainstream media
From:
Judith Miller Scolds Assange for not ‘Verifying’ Sources
(Amcon blog) -- by Kelley Vlahos --
Rarely do we see hypocrisy with such sparkle! Judith Miller, queen of the Curveball, matron of the missing WMD, maiden of the cakewalk, told her fellow media analysts on FOX News Watch this weekend that Julian Assange is a “bad journalist.” Why?
“because he didn’t care at all about attempting to verify the information that he was putting out, or determine whether or not it hurt anyone.”
See Judith Miller on Assange and Hat tip to Crooks and Liars this morning.
Judith Miller was heavily exploited as a very useful, very willing tool for the neoconservatives pushing the country into war with Iraq in 2003. Citing unverified evidence of Saddam Hussein’s nuclear ambitions, Miller wrote for The New York Times a series of reports that were later used by the Bush Administration as grounding for the invasion. Here was her response when it all backfired and fingers started pointing to her shoddy, agenda-ridden reporting:
“[M]y job isn’t to assess the government’s information and be an independent intelligence analyst myself. My job is to tell readers of The New York Times what the government thought about Iraq’s arsenal.”
Too bad, lady. But your little boo-boos have led to the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqis, 4,730 coalition soldiers, millions displaced, not to mention the orphans and widows (on both sides), the maimed, the mentally broken. The earth is scarred and polluted and there is a government there that has been, and likely still is, torturing its political enemies just as badly if not worse than Saddam Hussein.
Miller has found an unsurprising haven at FOX News, and her compatriots on the show this weekend were polite enough not to draw attention to the bald ironies being played out on the set. She starts work at Newsmax.com this week. Apparently, that is where all the “good journalists” go these days, right Judith?...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
Chris Moore comments:
Indeed, The New York Times and its many ideologically Zionist lackeys masquerading as journalists working there throughout its history and to this very day are ALL "very useful, very willing tools for the neoconservatives" -- AND the neoliberals, as well (not that there's much difference between the two).
Judith Miller Scolds Assange for not ‘Verifying’ Sources
(Amcon blog) -- by Kelley Vlahos --
Rarely do we see hypocrisy with such sparkle! Judith Miller, queen of the Curveball, matron of the missing WMD, maiden of the cakewalk, told her fellow media analysts on FOX News Watch this weekend that Julian Assange is a “bad journalist.” Why?
“because he didn’t care at all about attempting to verify the information that he was putting out, or determine whether or not it hurt anyone.”
See Judith Miller on Assange and Hat tip to Crooks and Liars this morning.
Judith Miller was heavily exploited as a very useful, very willing tool for the neoconservatives pushing the country into war with Iraq in 2003. Citing unverified evidence of Saddam Hussein’s nuclear ambitions, Miller wrote for The New York Times a series of reports that were later used by the Bush Administration as grounding for the invasion. Here was her response when it all backfired and fingers started pointing to her shoddy, agenda-ridden reporting:
“[M]y job isn’t to assess the government’s information and be an independent intelligence analyst myself. My job is to tell readers of The New York Times what the government thought about Iraq’s arsenal.”
Too bad, lady. But your little boo-boos have led to the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqis, 4,730 coalition soldiers, millions displaced, not to mention the orphans and widows (on both sides), the maimed, the mentally broken. The earth is scarred and polluted and there is a government there that has been, and likely still is, torturing its political enemies just as badly if not worse than Saddam Hussein.
Miller has found an unsurprising haven at FOX News, and her compatriots on the show this weekend were polite enough not to draw attention to the bald ironies being played out on the set. She starts work at Newsmax.com this week. Apparently, that is where all the “good journalists” go these days, right Judith?...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
Chris Moore comments:
Indeed, The New York Times and its many ideologically Zionist lackeys masquerading as journalists working there throughout its history and to this very day are ALL "very useful, very willing tools for the neoconservatives" -- AND the neoliberals, as well (not that there's much difference between the two).
Perpetual war to "save the Jews": the gift that keeps on giving to warmongers and Empire pimps
From:
Goldberg’s next war sure sounds a lot like his last one
(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --
Four months back, Jeffrey Goldberg published a long piece in the Atlantic called "The Point of No Return," making the Israeli case for the United States to attack Iran in Never-again terms: Iran is threatening the existence of “the Jewish people,” Israel is bound to act if the U.S. fails to, the U.S. will do a better job. The piece has stirred a lot of discussion. Goldberg has gone on national media and panels at thinktanks to promote these bellicose ideas.
But no one has pointed out that the piece makes the same argument Goldberg marshaled eight years ago for the U.S. to attack Iraq, that time with an article in the New Yorker magazine under the headline, "The Great Terror." Iraq too was bent on the destruction of the Jewish people, and was developing a nuclear weapon to do so.
The language in the pieces is eerily similar. The last time the concentration camp Goldberg invoked was Bergen-Belsen. This time around it’s Auschwitz.
Both times the enemy is "three years" away from going nuclear. Last time:
"The Great Terror" stated that Saddam had links to Al Qaeda, and the article was cited by both Bush and Cheney as proof of the threat posed by Iraq (Muhammad Idrees Ahmad has told me). As it turned out, Saddam Hussein didn’t possess weapons of mass destruction and didn’t attack Israel and wasn’t making a nuclear warhead or an aflatoxin/chemical/biological one and wasn't importing canisters of mysterious nerve gases, as Goldberg had affirmed. But meantime, the U.S. was at war with Iraq, in some measure because of the bad ideas that Goldberg proliferated, and we and the Iraqis and its neighbors are still suffering the consequences.
This time around, the question is, Why is anyone listening to Goldberg? Why are prestige news organizations giving him the microphone?...MORE...LINK
-----------------------
GOLDBERG'S LIST...
Goldberg’s next war sure sounds a lot like his last one
(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --
Four months back, Jeffrey Goldberg published a long piece in the Atlantic called "The Point of No Return," making the Israeli case for the United States to attack Iran in Never-again terms: Iran is threatening the existence of “the Jewish people,” Israel is bound to act if the U.S. fails to, the U.S. will do a better job. The piece has stirred a lot of discussion. Goldberg has gone on national media and panels at thinktanks to promote these bellicose ideas.
But no one has pointed out that the piece makes the same argument Goldberg marshaled eight years ago for the U.S. to attack Iraq, that time with an article in the New Yorker magazine under the headline, "The Great Terror." Iraq too was bent on the destruction of the Jewish people, and was developing a nuclear weapon to do so.
The language in the pieces is eerily similar. The last time the concentration camp Goldberg invoked was Bergen-Belsen. This time around it’s Auschwitz.
Both times the enemy is "three years" away from going nuclear. Last time:
He [August Hanning of German intelligence agency] does not equivocate. “It is our estimate that Iraq will have an atomic bomb in three years,” he said.This time:
Iran is, at most, one to three years away from having a breakout nuclear capability (often understood to be the capacity to assemble more than one missile-ready nuclear device within about three months of deciding to do so).The last time round Goldberg was flat wrong.
"The Great Terror" stated that Saddam had links to Al Qaeda, and the article was cited by both Bush and Cheney as proof of the threat posed by Iraq (Muhammad Idrees Ahmad has told me). As it turned out, Saddam Hussein didn’t possess weapons of mass destruction and didn’t attack Israel and wasn’t making a nuclear warhead or an aflatoxin/chemical/biological one and wasn't importing canisters of mysterious nerve gases, as Goldberg had affirmed. But meantime, the U.S. was at war with Iraq, in some measure because of the bad ideas that Goldberg proliferated, and we and the Iraqis and its neighbors are still suffering the consequences.
This time around, the question is, Why is anyone listening to Goldberg? Why are prestige news organizations giving him the microphone?...MORE...LINK
-----------------------
GOLDBERG'S LIST...
Sunday, January 02, 2011
Wealthy Jewry finances the Left in order to erode non-Jewish society, culture and civilization, advance the subversive ethnic Jewish interest
From:
Jews are the financial engine of the left
(Occidental Obersver) -- Kevin MacDonald --
In his book Why Are Jews Liberals?, Norman Podhoretz states that Jews fund the left in America. He states it as a rather obvious truth — so obvious that it doesn’t really require a great deal of research.
And he is not writing simply about explicitly Jewish activist organizations like the ADL, but also to organizations like the ACLU and the $PLC. In fact, in his 1996 book Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment, J. J. Goldberg pointed out that “within the world of liberal organizations like the ACLU and People for the American Way, Jewish influence is so profound that non-Jews sometimes blur the distinction between them and the formal Jewish community.”
For example, SUSPS, an environmentalist activist group attempting to influence the Sierra Club to oppose immigration, recounts the notorious donations north of $100 million by David Gelbaum to the Sierra Club on condition that they not oppose immigration. As Gelbaum famously said to the president of the Sierra Club, “”I did tell [Sierra Club President] Carl Pope in 1994 or 1995 that if they ever came out anti-immigration, they would never get a dollar from me.”
It turns out that Gelbaum is also a major donor to the ACLU — more than $20 million annually. The New York Times reports that Gelbaum will not be making his donation this year. But the gap will be at least partially filled: “Donors like the Leon Levy Foundation, the Open Society Institute [funded by George Soros], Peter B. Lewis and John Sperling had stepped up with pledges totaling $23 million spread over the next three years.”
The only thing these sources have in common is Jewishness. Sperling, Soros, and Lewis are on an authoritative list of the 139 Jews on the 2009 Forbes 400 list of wealthiest Americans; Leon Levy was also Jewish, not making the list only because he died in his 70s with a net worth of around a billion dollars (which would qualify him for the list today). The Times report also notes that donations had been hurt because some foundations had been harmed by the Bernie Madoff fiasco — also presumably Jewish money.
Several implications:
Lists of wealthiest Americans underestimate Jewish wealth because people like Levy don’t appear on lists of wealthy people even though their money is still being used to advance Jewish causes.
Secondly, Jews are very good at using their financial power to advance their ethnic interests. One of the biggest problems for European-Americans is that wealthy non-Jews seem far more interested in funding the opera or getting their name on a building at the local university than in helping their people. A good example is the Chandler family who formerly owned the L. A. Times. They had no interest in the media, and the company is now controlled by Sam Zell, who is Jewish. The family remains wealthy but in general seems to be involved in finding fun and interesting ways to spend their time (one of them flies around the world to attend the opera; another is into building outsize model trains) rather than influencing the world.
Finally, in researching this, I couldn’t help but notice that Lewis, Soros, and Sperling have gotten together previously. The Wikipedia entry for Sperling notes, “Together with George Soros, and Peter Lewis of Progressive Insurance, Sperling raised considerable amounts of money for drug [legalization] and other related causes, especially during the 2004 presidential campaign.”...MORE...LINK
---------------------------
Related: "Destroy the best of the Gentiles." -- The Jewish Talmud
-----
Related: How Jewish Communism "destroyed the best of the Gentiles."
Jews are the financial engine of the left
(Occidental Obersver) -- Kevin MacDonald --
In his book Why Are Jews Liberals?, Norman Podhoretz states that Jews fund the left in America. He states it as a rather obvious truth — so obvious that it doesn’t really require a great deal of research.
And he is not writing simply about explicitly Jewish activist organizations like the ADL, but also to organizations like the ACLU and the $PLC. In fact, in his 1996 book Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment, J. J. Goldberg pointed out that “within the world of liberal organizations like the ACLU and People for the American Way, Jewish influence is so profound that non-Jews sometimes blur the distinction between them and the formal Jewish community.”
For example, SUSPS, an environmentalist activist group attempting to influence the Sierra Club to oppose immigration, recounts the notorious donations north of $100 million by David Gelbaum to the Sierra Club on condition that they not oppose immigration. As Gelbaum famously said to the president of the Sierra Club, “”I did tell [Sierra Club President] Carl Pope in 1994 or 1995 that if they ever came out anti-immigration, they would never get a dollar from me.”
It turns out that Gelbaum is also a major donor to the ACLU — more than $20 million annually. The New York Times reports that Gelbaum will not be making his donation this year. But the gap will be at least partially filled: “Donors like the Leon Levy Foundation, the Open Society Institute [funded by George Soros], Peter B. Lewis and John Sperling had stepped up with pledges totaling $23 million spread over the next three years.”
The only thing these sources have in common is Jewishness. Sperling, Soros, and Lewis are on an authoritative list of the 139 Jews on the 2009 Forbes 400 list of wealthiest Americans; Leon Levy was also Jewish, not making the list only because he died in his 70s with a net worth of around a billion dollars (which would qualify him for the list today). The Times report also notes that donations had been hurt because some foundations had been harmed by the Bernie Madoff fiasco — also presumably Jewish money.
Several implications:
Lists of wealthiest Americans underestimate Jewish wealth because people like Levy don’t appear on lists of wealthy people even though their money is still being used to advance Jewish causes.
Secondly, Jews are very good at using their financial power to advance their ethnic interests. One of the biggest problems for European-Americans is that wealthy non-Jews seem far more interested in funding the opera or getting their name on a building at the local university than in helping their people. A good example is the Chandler family who formerly owned the L. A. Times. They had no interest in the media, and the company is now controlled by Sam Zell, who is Jewish. The family remains wealthy but in general seems to be involved in finding fun and interesting ways to spend their time (one of them flies around the world to attend the opera; another is into building outsize model trains) rather than influencing the world.
Finally, in researching this, I couldn’t help but notice that Lewis, Soros, and Sperling have gotten together previously. The Wikipedia entry for Sperling notes, “Together with George Soros, and Peter Lewis of Progressive Insurance, Sperling raised considerable amounts of money for drug [legalization] and other related causes, especially during the 2004 presidential campaign.”...MORE...LINK
---------------------------
Related: "Destroy the best of the Gentiles." -- The Jewish Talmud
-----
Related: How Jewish Communism "destroyed the best of the Gentiles."
Jewish-American Zionist network the self-serving linchpin of Democrat fundraising; no wonder politicos are Zionist lackeys
From:
How many 32-year-olds can raise ‘millions of dollars’ for a presidential campaign?
(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --
A friend sent me this clip and asked me how come a 32-year-old could raise millions of dollars in American politics? From the Times report on Rahm Emanuel:
And the importance of Jewish money to the Democratic Party-- much of that money servile to a pro-Israel agenda-- was also a factor. The Washington Post has said that over 50 percent of the money Democrats raise is from Jews.
Here is a recent and important piece on the late Stephen Solarz's fears of losing his congressional district to redistricting in '82, and how he raised pro-Israel money nationally to save it. Note that freshman Chuck Schumer, also 32, also feared losing his seat-- and promptly accumulated the third-largest congressional warchest. Did you hear that: freshman Chuck Schumer, also 32, with 3d largest congressional bankroll...
Today when you read the news that Obama was misled by Israeli defense minister Ehud Barak about the peace process-- a mere 10 years after Barak had Bill Clinton on the phone all thru the 2000 peace process, when we were Israel's lawyer, and Israel refused to divide Jerusalem, you simply have to reflect on the money power of the Israel lobby in American politics...MORE...LINK
How many 32-year-olds can raise ‘millions of dollars’ for a presidential campaign?
(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --
A friend sent me this clip and asked me how come a 32-year-old could raise millions of dollars in American politics? From the Times report on Rahm Emanuel:
Mr. Clinton, then the Arkansas governor, was a longshot candidate for the Democratic nomination in 1992. One of the first fulltime staff members hired in Little Rock, to raise money, was Mr. Emanuel, then 32.I believe that the fact that Emanuel had served as a civilian volunteer for Israel during the '91 Gulf War played a part in this supernatural ability. He was able to tell people that he stood with Israel.
Mr. Emanuel quickly increased Mr. Clinton’s credibility by building an impressive operation and raising millions of dollars.
And the importance of Jewish money to the Democratic Party-- much of that money servile to a pro-Israel agenda-- was also a factor. The Washington Post has said that over 50 percent of the money Democrats raise is from Jews.
Here is a recent and important piece on the late Stephen Solarz's fears of losing his congressional district to redistricting in '82, and how he raised pro-Israel money nationally to save it. Note that freshman Chuck Schumer, also 32, also feared losing his seat-- and promptly accumulated the third-largest congressional warchest. Did you hear that: freshman Chuck Schumer, also 32, with 3d largest congressional bankroll...
Today when you read the news that Obama was misled by Israeli defense minister Ehud Barak about the peace process-- a mere 10 years after Barak had Bill Clinton on the phone all thru the 2000 peace process, when we were Israel's lawyer, and Israel refused to divide Jerusalem, you simply have to reflect on the money power of the Israel lobby in American politics...MORE...LINK
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)