Friday, March 11, 2011

Over his career, neocon agitprop David Horowitz transitioned from Red fascist to Zionist fascist, but his Judeofascist essence has remained the same

(By Chris Moore) -- Jewish-American Zionist activist and agitator David Horowitz personifies American Judeofascism's transition from Red fascism to Zionist fascism; he was indoctrinated into a career of subversion early on, and his subversive ethic remains to this day.

In the beginning, Horowitz's parents were committed Communists, and David was a prototypical red-diaper baby.
David Horowitz’s RADICAL SON: A GENERATIONAL ODYSSEY is a powerful autobiographical account of his political and spiritual journey from the left to the right. Horowitz was a “red diaper baby.” Both his parents were committed members of the Communist Party. Horowitz grew up in the closed world created by the Party, attending Party schools and even a Party summer camp. Though as a young man Horowitz renounced his childhood Stalinism, he still clung to the dream of socialism. As a graduate student at the University of California, Berkeley, in the early 1960’s, Horowitz helped create the New Left, a radical movement dominated by students who hoped to rescue and renew the left project by uniting Marxism with what they believed were more humane and liberating values.
Long-time FBI director J. Edgar Hoover knew a thing or two about the "values" embraced Red fascists like the Horowitz's, which he documented in testimony before Congress in 1947:
"The mad march of Red fascism is a cause for concern in America. But the deceit, the trickery, and the lies of the American communists are catching up with them...They know that their backs will soon be to the wall...

"Herein lies the greatest menace of communism. For these are the people who infiltrate and corrupt various spheres of American life. So rather than the size of the Communist Party, the way to weigh its true importance is by testing its influence, its ability to infiltrate. ...

"The communists have developed one of the greatest propaganda machines the world has ever known...The objective, of course, is to develop discontent and hasten the day when the communists can gather sufficient support and following to overthrow the American way of life..."
Unfortunately, Hoover was never able to nail all Communist subversives like the Horowitz's for their treason, and their son David learned all of their dirtiest tricks, and eventually moved into a leadership position in the New Left himself:
Horowitz quickly became a leader in the radical movement, writing books criticizing American Cold War policy which became widely influential in leftist circles. On the strength of his intellectual reputation, Horowitz became one of the editors of RAMPARTS, the leading radical journal of the 1960’s. Here Horowitz became involved with the Black Panther Party. Overlooking the Panthers’ violence and criminal activities, Horowitz convinced himself that his new associates were earnest revolutionaries like himself. When the Panthers murdered an accountant he had placed with them, Horowitz began a process of reevaluating his convictions. He came to believe that the radical movement of the 1960’s had been a mistake, with revolutionary zeal a mask for arrogance and self-promotion.
The term "neoconservative" was originally a shorthand reference to formerly Red fascist Communists (mostly Jews like Horowitz) who transitioned into fascist Zionism under the guise of "conservatism." It has since become a full blown ideology embraced by many statist-liberal-capitalists (neoliberals) and ostensibly mainstream conservatives in Establishment Washington, as well.

In 2008, journalist Jacob Heilbrunn wrote a book documenting the Jewish background and motives of the neocons called They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons, reviewed here by Philip Weiss:
It is hard to imagine a title more overdue than They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons. Ever since neoconservatism’s chief contribution to world betterment, the Iraq War, began losing its luster, its adherents have gone into a kind of hiding, and the media has given them cover. Former Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and New York Times columnist David Brooks, one or both of whom are neoconservatives, have suggested that the word is an anti-Semitic epithet. Others try to avoid it entirely: when Bill Kristol, who was definitely once a neoconservative, was hired by the New York Times as a columnist, the paper called him a “conservative” and said his father Irving Kristol, one of the movement’s founders, was a leader of “modern conservatism.”

Jacob Heilbrunn asserts that neoconservatives have so far gotten away “scot-free” with planning the greatest foreign-policy disaster since Vietnam. And so his book will call them to account. Not quite.

Heilbrunn achieves one important chore: a forthright social narrative of the neocons as a Jewish movement. Tracing ideological currents in the Jewish community from the 1940s to the 1970s, Heilbrunn, a journalist who himself flirted with neoconservatism, describes how the neocons were propelled by resentments against WASP elites—the men who had ignored the Holocaust, they felt, and “frozen out” Jews from the establishment. It would be hard to overemphasize Heilbrunn’s accomplishment. There has been endless prevarication about the fact that neoconservatism is an element of the Jewish experience, even from liberal Jews...
Was the resentment of the WASP elites really motivated by the Holocaust and being frozen out, or was it motivated by the fact that authorities like J. Edgar Hoover hounded their Red fascist racket into oblivion?

Regardless, Philip Weiss has a blog called Mondoweiss that recently ran a post by Zoe Zenowich that documented the latest antics by perennial Judeofascist agitprop Horowitz, who himself long ago transitioned from his Red fascist identity to a Zionist fascist one. The opportunistic Horowitz is apparently piggy-backing on neocon demagogue Rep. Peter King's hearings on alleged Islamic-American radicalization (King is a Republican from New York who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee) by holding hearings of his own on college campuses.
Brooklyn College had its own Peter King hearing last night when right-wing commentator David Horowitz spoke to a feisty crowd of students and faculty...

Outside the library where the lecture was held, security guards insisted that ten or so peaceful protesters huddled in the rain stand behind steel gates they had brought out for the occasion. Inside, security guards searched bags before running a handheld metal detector over everyone entering the lecture hall—security measures I have never before experienced in my four years of attending guest speaker events at the college. In his opening comments, Horowitz remarked, “How does it feel to go through a check point? I’ll tell you one thing, I feel safer and that’s what check points are about—making people feel safe when they’re under attack by terrorists and Middle East Jew haters. “ Later, Horowitz added, “check points are there to protect the innocent from the guilty.”...

Horowitz, who admitted he had actually never even been to Israel, proceeded to give everyone a lesson in Middle East politics: according to him, Muslims in the Middle East are “Islamic Nazi’s” who “want to kill Jews, that’s their agenda.” He added later, “all Muslim associations are fronts for the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Horowitz appeared to be too delusional to even be quoted, or taken seriously if it weren’t for the audience members who so fervently agreed with what he was saying.

The most revealing moment came when a young Arab-American woman directed a question to Horowitz and the audience: “You talk about Muslims as if you know them—We have a Muslim American Society, we have a Palestine Club [on campus]. I want to raise the question to any of the Jews in this room, and students, have you guys ever been threatened by a Muslim on campus or an Arab?” To this, the crowd almost unanimously spun around in their seats to face the young woman and replied “yes.” Someone shouted, “and we’re scared when we see Muslims on buses and airplanes too.”

Horowitz encouraged anti-Muslim hate by telling the crowd, “no other people have sunk so low as the Palestinians have and yet everybody is afraid to say this,” claiming that Muslims are a “protected species in this country” and that he’s “wait[ing] for the day when the good Muslims step forward.”

The scary thing is that people listen to such hateful rhetoric and nod along. What would they say if someone said the same about Jewish people?...
So what are Judeofascist's like Horowitz and ideological neocon bootlickers like Rep. King, himself the recipiant of large amounts of Zionist money, attempting to accomplish with all of this?

Nothing short of the Israelification of American society by whipping up fear and hysteria, and manipulating Americans into transferring ever more taxpayer dollars into the "national security" and "Homeland Security" rackets. Note above how Horowitz glorified the concept of "check points," which are a common feature of Israeli society. Note how former Homeland Security czar Michael Chertoff, himself a Judeofascist, implemented the TSA scanner check points in airports all across American, and true to fascist modus-operandi, made a fortune for himself doings so.

These are the types of demagogic and taxpayer-thieving wealth-transfer activities from the American middle class and working class to the Zionist-racketeering class that have been going on for years now in Judeofascist/neocon-neolib occupied Washington, and will only continue to get worse until the entire Judeofascist-corrupted Establishment is flogged from the American temple once and for all.

Perhaps we can start with self-serving, opportunistic Judeofascists Zionist agitprops like David Horowitz, who has demonstrated his anti-American treason at every turn throughout his life.

Is there any good reason that a Zionist-racketeering, Judeofascist Israel-firster such as himself shouldn't face an investigation for treason, or at the very least, a tribunal hearing for deportation to Israel?

After all, menacing Judeofascist Bolsheviks like Emma Goldman were deported from America to the Soviet Union for the safety and betterment of American society during the reign of the Communist menace; so why shouldn't Judeofascist Zionists like Horowitz face expulsion to their own ethno-ideological homeland of Israel, which, along with their own pocketbooks, is their primary loyalty anyway?

In J. Edgar Hoover's words, the Judeofascists Bolsheviks sought to "overthrow the American way of life," and today, so do the Judeofascist Zionists and their cynical, self-serving fascist Big Government collaborators of both Left and Right.

Neocon agitprop David Horowitz meandered from Red fascism to Zionist fascism, but his Judeofascist essence remained constant


Chu said...

check out this den of lizards!

the amen crowd in full effect.
IT's distugusting how this Judeofascist lies right at the end about always supporting muslims and black his whole life.

what's interesting is how the den is in large part agreeing with everything he says. It's not the evil zionists, but the whole crowd of brooklynites in the audience.

Chris Moore said...

Loudly and piously claiming they're sensitive, compassionate "anti-racists" and advocates of "civil rights" is all part of the Judeofascist camouflage. It provides them the cover and (counterfeit) moral authority they need carry out their various fascist rackets.

Jesus called these types publicly pious hypocrites:

Matthew 6:5-6: "And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men....when thou prayest, enter into thy closet and when thou has shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret...."