Monday, May 31, 2010

Out of control Israel now clearly guilty of premeditated mass murder; world must act to isolate dangerous rogue state

Israeli Butchery at Sea

( -- By Gilad Atzmon --

As I write this piece the scale of the Israeli lethal slaughter at sea is yet to be clear. However we already know that at around 4am Gaza time, hundreds of IDF commandos stormed the Free Gaza international humanitarian fleet. We learn from the Arab press that at least 16 peace activists have been murdered and more than 50 were injured. Once again it is devastatingly obvious that Israel is not trying to hide its true nature: an inhuman murderous collective fuelled by a psychosis and driven by paranoia.

For days the Israeli government prepared the Israeli society for the massacre at sea. It said that the Flotilla carried weapons, it had ‘terrorists’ on board. Only yesterday evening it occurred to me that this Israeli malicious media spin was there to prepare the Israeli public for a full scale Israeli deadly military operation in international waters. Make no mistake. If I knew exactly where Israel was heading and the possible consequences, the Israeli cabinet and military elite were fully aware of it all the way along. What happened yesterday wasn’t just a pirate terrorist attack. It was actually murder in broad day light even though it happened in the dark.

Yesterday at 10 pm I contacted Free Gaza and shared with them everything I knew. I obviously grasped that hundreds of peace activists most of them elders, had very little chance against the Israeli killing machine. I was praying all night for our brothers and sisters. At 5am GMT the news broke to the world. In international waters Israel raided an innocent international convoy of boats carrying cement, paper and medical aid to the besieged Gazans. The Israelis were using live ammunition murdering and injuring everything around them.

Today we will see demonstrations around the world, we will see many events mourning our dead. We may even see some of Israel’s friends ‘posturing’ against the slaughter. Clearly this is not enough.

The massacre that took place yesterday was a premeditated Israeli operation. Israel wanted blood because it believes that its ‘power of deterrence’ expands with the more dead it leaves behind. The Israeli decision to use hundreds of commando soldiers against civilians was taken by the Israeli cabinet together with the Israeli top military commanders. What we saw yesterday wasn’t just a failure on the ground. It was actually an institutional failure of a morbid society that a long time ago lost touch with humanity.

It is no secret that Palestinians are living in a siege for years. But it is now down to the nations to move on and mount the ultimate pressure on Israel and its citizens. Since the massacre yesterday was committed by a popular army that followed instructions given by a ‘democratically elected’ government, from now on, every Israeli should be considered as a suspicious war criminal unless proved different.

Considering the fact that Israel stormed naval vessels sailing under Irish, Turkish and Greek flags. Both NATO members and EU countries must immediately cease their relationships with Israel and close their airspace to Israeli airplanes.

Considering yesterday’s news about Israeli nuclear submarines being stationed in the Gulf, the world must react quickly and severely. Israel is now officially mad and deadly. The Jewish State is not just careless about human life, as we have been following the Israeli press campaign leading to the slaughter, Israel actually seeks pleasure in inflicting pain and devastation on others...LINK

Chris Moore comments:

It’s ironic that the Left, which for decades instructed the world that Western Civilization and Christendom’s shoddy treatment of organized Jewry proved the necessity of their overthrow, and collaborated with Jewish Bolshevism in the mass murder of Orthodox Christians, now feigns shock and outrage at the monstrous behavior of its “erstwhile” partners. Meanwhile, the liberals wring their hands knowing full well hypocritical U.S. left-liberalism is hip deep in Jewish supremacism itself; and the idiot Judeo-Christians have picked up in collaboration and defense of the Judeofascist interest where the Left is starting to drop out.

It's all enough to turn one into a libertarian. The other fools just keep digging us deeper and deeper into deals with the devil.

World angrily condemns Israeli massacre of aid convoy, but Jewish supremacist Washington only issues "regrets"

Israeli naval attack triggers protests through Europe, Mideast
(Reuters) -- By Cynthia Johnston --

DUBAI—Israel's storming of a Gaza-bound aid flotilla set off a diplomatic furor, drawing criticism from friends and foes alike and straining ties with regional ally Turkey, which called off planned joint military exercises.

The United Nations Security Council called an emergency session for later on Monday following the killing of a number of mostly international activists aboard a six-ship convoy that tried to break Israel's blockade of Gaza.

Washington said it deeply regretted the loss of life and was examining the circumstances that led to the bloodshed while Turkey, Israel's strongest Muslim friend in the region, summoned the Jewish state's ambassador and said it would recall its own.

"This attack is another sign of the reckless levels that the Israeli government's violent policies have reached," Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Bulent Arinc said in a televised speech.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cancelled plans to meet U.S. President Barack Obama in Washington on Tuesday, an Israeli statement said, in the wake of the raid.

"Netanyahu decided to cut short his visit to Canada and return to Israel early," the statement said. Netanyahu has been in Canada since Friday for talks with government leaders.

Israeli commandos intercepted the flotilla carrying 700 people and 10,000 tonnes of supplies for Gaza before dawn on Monday. Officials said they were met with knives when they boarded the ships, including a ferry flying the Turkish flag.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas described the killings as a massacre, and the United Nations and European Union both demanded an inquiry. Rights group Amnesty International said Israeli forces appeared to have used excessive force.

Turkey, which had urged Israel to allow the ships safe passage, cancelled three planned joint military exercises with Israel, and Ankara said Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan would cut short an official visit to Latin America to return home.

"Israel will have to endure the consequences of this behaviour," Turkey's Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

Television images from Ankara, whose ties with Israel had already soured somewhat since last year following Turkish criticism of Israel, showed dozens of people gathered outside Israeli Ambassador Gabby Levy's residence in Turkey's capital.

France's Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said the violence could not be justified. "I am profoundly shocked by the tragic consequences of the Israeli military operation against the Peace Flotilla for Gaza," he said in a statement.

United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said: "It is vital that there is a full investigation to determine exactly how this bloodshed took place. I believe Israel must urgently provide a full explanation."


Iran, one of Israel's biggest foes, said the killings were "inhuman" and would help lead to the Jewish state's demise, and some 200 Iranians staged a demonstration near the United Nations building in Tehran to protest against the storming.

"All these acts indicate the end of the heinous and fake regime and will bring it closer to the end of its existence," President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told state broadcaster IRIB. Iran is under international pressure over its nuclear programme.

In the Arab world, the incident was viewed as an overreaction to an attempt to challenge Israel's Gaza blockade that could put the brakes on any further efforts at normalization and may derail the peace process.

"Israel's attack indicates Israel is not ready for peace. Israel attacked the liberty fleet because it feels it is above the law," Arab League Secretary General Amr Moussa said.

"There is no benefit in dealing with Israel in this manner and we must re-assess our dealing with Israel," he said...MORE...LINK

Sunday, May 30, 2010

American Jewish-Zionist media mogul utilizes his assets to propagate the "Israel is our ally" myth

The Strategic Ally Myth

( -- by Philip Giraldi --

It is difficult to understand why anyone would take Mort Zuckerman seriously. He is a New York based but Canadian born Israel firster who made a fortune in real estate before buying The New York Daily News and the US News and World Report. He now fancies himself as a leading journalist and political commentator. Zuckerman is frequently spotted on the television talking head circuit where he dispenses analysis of international events that could have been crafted in Tel Aviv or Herzliya, where the Israeli intelligence service Mossad has its headquarters.

Zuckerman’s latest contribution to international harmony is a lengthy piece in the US News & World Report entitled “Israel Is a Key Ally and Deserves US Support.” It is a propaganda piece that promotes one of the most persistent fictions put out by the mainstream media, that the relationship with Israel somehow benefits the United States. To give the devil his due, it is not often that an article in a national publication includes an out-and-out lie in its first few words, but Zuckerman succeeds in doing just that. As he is a smart man who went to Harvard Law School before becoming a propagandist for Israel, he must know that words have meanings. But the significance of the word “ally” must have somehow eluded his grasp. Israel is not now and never has been an ally of the United States. As Zuckerman is a lawyer he should know that to be an ally requires an agreement in writing that spells out the conditions and reciprocity of the relationship. Israel has never been an ally of any country because it would force it to restrain its aggressive behavior, requiring consultation with its ally before attacking other nations. It is also unable to define its own borders, which have been expanding ever since it was founded in 1948. Without defined borders it is impossible to enter into an alliance because most alliances are established so that one country will come to the aid of another if it is attacked, which normally means having its territorial integrity violated. Since Israel intends to continue expanding its borders it cannot commit to an alliance with anyone and has, in fact, rebuffed several bids by Washington to enter into some kind of formal arrangement...

Israeli tunnel vision means that most of the actual intelligence that Tel Aviv collects is on organizations that resent being occupied or bombed by Israel, not groups that actually threaten the US, a point ignored by Zuckerman. And to those who argue that using billions of American taxpayers dollars to buy US military equipment for Israel is not necessarily money well spent in the middle of a financial crisis or that Washington’s unlimited support for Tel Aviv is precisely the reason why the United States is in trouble around the world, Zuckerman delivers a final, devastating retort. Israel has an unrivaled location on the Mediterranean. Per Zuckerman “One analyst has described Israel as a ’strategic aircraft carrier’…”

Well, Mort Zuckerman is certainly entitled to his own opinion and I suppose he can use the magazine he owns to spread Israeli hasbara, but the notion that Israel is some kind of strategic asset for the United States is nonsense, a complete fabrication. Most recently, Chas Freeman has pointed out that Israel is useless for the projection of American power. The US has numerous bases in Arab countries but is not allowed to use any military base in Israel. Washington’s own carrier groups and other forces in place all over the Middle East, including the Red Sea, have capabilities that far exceed those of the Israel Defense Forces. Israel has never been a strategic asset or any asset at all, always a liability. Even the stockpiles of US equipment in Israel are a typical bit of bonus support for Tel Aviv from Congress, placed there for the Israelis to use “in emergencies” while making it appear that they are for American forces. The supplies are, in fact, regularly looted by the Israelis, leaving largely unusable or picked over equipment for US forces if it should ever be needed.

Make no mistake, Tel Aviv is always carefully calculating how it can use Washington to further its own objectives with little regard for possible American interests. In 1967 the Israelis attacked the USS Liberty in international waters with the intention of sinking the ship and killing all the crew. During the first Gulf War Israel had to be defended by the United States. In the Cold War Israel spied aggressively on the US while cutting deals with both the Soviets and Chinese. The intelligence provided by Israel that Zuckerman praises is generally fabricated and completely self serving, intended to shape a narrative about the Middle East that makes the Israelis look good and virtually everyone else look bad – ask any intelligence officer who has seen the stuff. Israel as a key ally and security asset? A “strategic aircraft carrier”? Completely ridiculous...MORE...LINK

Friday, May 28, 2010

More evidence of Washington's Jewish-supremacy problem: Schumer likely to take leadership of Senate by way of Jewish networking

Jewish Tribalism in Action: Charles Schumer poised to become Senate Majority Leader

(Occidental Dissent) -- By H. Rock White --

Charles Schumer, a Jewish Senator from New York, is poised to become the Senate Majority Leader if, as currently expected, Harry Reid of Nevada is voted out of office, but Democrats retain an overall majority in the Senate. How he got there is, like the Elena Kagan nomination to the Supreme Court, a prime example of Jewish networking. An article in the Washington Post, written by an admirer and fellow Jew, is quite revealing in its celebration of both Schumer’s stereotypically Jewish behavior and listing his myriad connections which helped him rise to the top, most of whom are Jewish. Horowitz opens by praising Schumer’s stereotypically Jewish behavior as ‘effective’, but admitting that average white Americans find it repugnant:

During his three-decade legislative career, Schumer, 59, has developed a reputation as a razor-elbowed, shamelessly self-serving, media-addicted political monster. He is also arguably the single most effective lawmaker of his generation.

There is a sense within the White House that Durbin would be easier to work with, that Schumer would pose a problem on issues that could get him press back home, and that his Brooklyn bearing doesn’t exactly play between the coasts.

From an early age, Schumer’s Jewish networking is evident:

He worked for Stanley Kaplan, the testing guru, and aced his SATs.

“A strong education was enormously important,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) who, like Schumer, former Minnesota senator Norm Coleman and Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, graduated from James Madison High School in Brooklyn.

Stanley Kaplan, Bernie Sanders, Norm Coleman, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg are all Jewish. The U.S. Senate, which by population proportion should only contain one or two Jews, has three Jewish Senators from the same school in Brooklyn (and 14 total, including the soon to be departed Arlen Specter)...MORE...LINK

Peter Beinert takes phony Jewish-American Zionist "liberalism" to the next level of deceit

Liberal Zionists Against the Israel Lobby?
(Wake Up America) -- By Stephen Sniegoski --

...Peter Beinart has been very much an establishment pro-Zionist, pro-war liberal, who edited the pro-Zionist “New Republic” from 1999 to 2006. Quoting from Wikipedia:

“For the December 13, 2004 edition of The New Republic, Beinart wrote an article titled ‘A Fighting Faith: An Argument for a New Liberalism,’ in which he argued that liberals should draw upon the anti-totalitarianism liberalism of the early cold war to develop a distinctive strategy against jihadist terrorism. New York Times columnist [neocon] David Brooks called ‘A Fighting Faith’ ‘the most discussed essay of the postelection period.’

“Beinart spent 2005 as a guest scholar at the [liberal] Brookings Institution , where he turned his essay into a book, ‘The Good Fight: Why Liberals—and Only Liberals—Can Win the War on Terror and Make America Great Again’ (HarperCollins, 2006).”

So after being a war liberal, supporting the policy of the neoconservatives, Beinart is seemingly making something of a change with his essay, “The Failure of the American Jewish Establishment.”

But this change, as will be pointed out, is more superficial than real.

Beinart’s major concern is that most young Jews do not identify with Zionism, and that liberal Jews especially reject Zionism. “Among American Jews today,” he writes, “there are a great many Zionists, especially in the Orthodox world, people deeply devoted to the State of Israel. And there are a great many liberals, especially in the secular Jewish world, people deeply devoted to human rights for all people, Palestinians included. But the two groups are increasingly distinct. Particularly in the younger generations, fewer and fewer American Jewish liberals are Zionists; fewer and fewer American Jewish Zionists are liberal.”

Beinart wants a new type of Zionism that will attract youthful liberals. He writes that “there is a different Zionist calling, which has never been more desperately relevant. It has its roots in Israel’s Independence Proclamation, which promised that the Jewish state ‘will be based on the precepts of liberty, justice and peace taught by the Hebrew prophets,’ and in the December 1948 letter from Albert Einstein, Hannah Arendt, and others to The New York Times, protesting right-wing Zionist leader Menachem Begin’s visit to the United States after his party’s militias massacred Arab civilians in the village of Deir Yassin. It is a call to recognize that in a world in which Jewish fortunes have radically changed, the best way to memorialize the history of Jewish suffering is through the ethical use of Jewish power.”

It is apparent that Beinart’s position on Zionism is quite similar to his earlier position on the “war on terror.” Then he wanted to draw liberals over to the “war on terror” and not leave it under the control of the neocon right. Now he wants to draw liberals over to the support of Zionism, which is currently controlled by the right. Note that in both cases he has wanted to maintain the underlying policies and just make them fit better into the liberal worldview.

To what degree does Beinart really want to liberalize the fundamentals of Zionism? As he revealed in a debate with the more hard–line Zionist Jeffrey Goldberg (, he is fundamentally concerned about a strategy to protect Israel, not fairness for the Palestinians. Beinart declared: “I’m not asking Israel to be Utopian. I’m not asking it to allow Palestinians who were forced out (or fled) in 1948 to return to their homes. I’m not even asking it to allow full, equal citizenship to Arab Israelis, since that would require Israel no longer being a Jewish state. I’m actually pretty willing to compromise my liberalism for Israel’s security and for its status as a Jewish state. What I am asking is that Israel not do things that foreclose the possibility of a Palestinian state in the West Bank, because if it is does that it will become–and I’m quoting Ehud Olmert and Ehud Barak here–an ‘apartheid state.’”

Note that Beinart is far from being devoted to basic liberal principles. He does not even want Arab Israelis to be equal citizens—a fundamental principle of modern democracy. Beinart, in short, acknowledges that he puts the preservation of the Jewish nature of the Israeli state above basic liberal principles. And Beinart only is asking “that Israel not do things that foreclose the possibility of a Palestinian state in the West Bank.” He does not say Israel must abide by UN resolution 242 and turn over control of the West Bank to the Palestinians so as to enable them to have a viable state.

Beinart, in short, does not seem to be concerned about the effects of Israel’s actions on the Palestinians but rather on the image of Israel. If widely perceived as a “apartheid state,” Israel would become an isolated, pariah nation like the former white-ruled South Africa. So although Beinart wants to make Israel attractive to liberals, what he seems most concerned about is not liberal principles but the optimal way of protecting Israel. Israel has to maintain at least the semblance of liberalism in order to both attract Jewish liberals and maintain legitimacy in the world...MORE...LINK

Caving Dems afraid of losing corrupt Israel-first Jewish Zionist sugar daddies over faux-pas of temporarily putting American interests first

Democrats afraid of Jewish revenge in midterms

(War in Context) -- by Paul Woodward --

The niceties of America’s often straight-laced political discourse generally preclude the use of a phrase as provocative as this: Jewish revenge. One of the virtues of the Israeli press, however, is that it can be refreshingly blunt.

“Officials in the Democratic Party are afraid that the Jews will take revenge in the midterm elections, which is the reason for the vigorous courting of Israel,” reports Yedioth Ahronoth today. Some of the courting the paper refers to just came from White House chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, whose recent trip to Israel was ostensibly a family affair — he was there to attend his son’s Bar Mitzvah — but it turned out that he also had important and very public business to take care of: a kiss-and-make-up session with Benjamin Netanyahu.
Didi Remez provides an English translation of the Hebrew report
According to reports that reached Jerusalem, it is no coincidence that Obama and his staff have suddenly begun to speak warmly about Israel, to compliment it for the good will gestures it extended to the Palestinians and mainly to admit that they had erred by treating Israel unfairly in Obama’s first year. It appears that the Obama administration’s attack on Netanyahu after the publication of the tender to build 1,6000 new housing units in Ramat Shlomo backfired.

Information that was received by Israeli sources would seem to indicate that the principal reason for the change in approach to Israel is pressure from Democrat lawmakers who are running for election and are finding themselves hard put to enlist Jewish donors to their campaigns. There is a great deal of anger at Obama within the Jewish community and disappointment over his policy toward Israel. Officials in the Democratic Party are afraid that the Jews will take revenge in the midterm elections, which is the reason for the vigorous courting of Israel. In other words, the fear is that the Jewish vote will gravitate away from Democratic candidates to Republicans.

"In other words, the fear is that the Jewish vote will gravitate away from Democratic candidates to Republicans."

Chris Moore comments:

Actually, in other words, the fear is that Jewish nationalist money will gravitate away from corrupt, bought-off Democratic politicians and candidates in order to buy off corrupt Republican politicians and candidates. If it was just the Jewish vote, I doubt politicians would be overly concerned given that Jews comprise under 2% of the U.S. population.

Our government is for sale to the highest bidder, and our "representatives" are but whores dancing on the strings of the Israel lobby and the Jewish nationalist community in America.

And people wonder why this country is going into the toilet. It's little wonder when a country's own politicians put the interests of another country first.
PS, here's a little comment I wrote on a different matter, but that is relevant to the question of certain WASPs and "Judeo-Christians" in Congress selling their souls in Faustian bargains with Zionist Jewry:

I think a distinction needs to be made between the WASPs who will sell their souls to Zionist Jewry and the Devil for money and power, and those who won’t.

Here’s one small example. After defeating Hitler and Nazism, General Patton wanted to turn his guns on Stalin and Communism, and said so. However, he was sabotaged by the Jewish Morgenthau and Wall Street Jewry, and by corrupt WASPs in the Roosevelt/Truman administrations.

The point is, patriotic WASPs like Patton don’t sell their souls, whereas Internationalist, ideologically borderless, and money-worshipping WASPs do so routinely. In fact, I would say that most of the more treasonous “idealism” of the traitorous WASPs is driven by their greed, and used to paper over what is, at base, an insatiably money-hungry Judeo-character.

This is why so many “Judeo-Christian” (as opposed to Christian-Christians) identify with Jewry on so many different levels.

I would say it’s safe to assume that every Israel-supporting WASP and Judeo-Christian in the U.S. Congress, for example, is of the treasonous variety.

Monday, May 24, 2010

With nothing left to lose, James Traficant can afford to tell Israel-firster Sean Hannity the truth about the Israel lobby -- and does

Hannity and Traficant Get into Shouting Match Over Israel Lobby and U.S. Policy (You Tube) -- tpmtv --

C.I. Scofield, the charlatan swindler behind End Times theology that animates Dispensationalists, was promoted and financed by Zionist Jewry

Christians- Zionism's Useful Idiots
(Save The Males) -- By Tim Campbell --

You know the imagery-- millions of Christians around the world have spontaneously disappeared - where did they go? Some say aliens, others terrorists. Now airplanes are plummeting to destruction, trains derailing, cars crashing, nuclear power plants are melting down and dumbfounded people staggering around in confusion looking for their children... Who unleashed this insanity on mankind?

My brother, who is an atheist, and I were watching TBN a while back and happened upon these images from Kirk Cameron's blockbuster film, Left Behind. There were no shortages of side-splitting laughs.

The false ideas put forward in most movies and books pertaining to end-times Biblical prophecy appear to most as sheer unadulterated religious stupidity but to the majority of protestant Christians particularly, in America, they are both real and imminent...

The Scofield Bible heralds the coming kingdom of the Jews in which God's Chosen People shall reign over all the earth. Scofield, a notorious criminal who popularized dispensational theology, is revered by many Christian evangelicals. Everywhere that evangelism in America goes, these lies will most surely follow. That is unfortunate, but it is by design.

While part of the Lotus Club in New York during the late 19th century, Scofield was brought under the domain of Zionists by Samuel Untermeyer, an illuminist. Untermeyer and other key Zionist's recognized within Scofield's theology a very powerful weapon for their cause... and it has flourished in its acceptance until this day. Dispensational theology is a major contributor in the founding and continuance of the current Jewish state.

Untermeyer later became chairman of the Anti-Nazi league, American Jewish Committee and American League of Jewish Patriots. He blackmailed President Wilson into placing Louis Dombitz Brandeis into a vacant seat on the Supreme Court. In 1933, on WABC, he declared war on Germany and described Jews as the aristocrats of the world.

Untermeyer brought Scofield into correspondence with many important Zionist leaders of the day like Jacob Schiff, Bernard Baruch and Samuel Gompers to name a few. They were his handlers and funders.

Dispensationalism and its attendant false ideas like the pre-tribulation rapture is probably the most pestilent propaganda being promoted today. The ultimate purpose of these teachings will lead the masses to destruction in the future through a false worship type of event.

This said, the doctrine has many more detrimental immediate consequences. Its exponents find refuge in the comfort of not having to participate in the future affairs of mankind. Potent deceptions surround the Christian Zionist movement and Dispensationalism - dig here; there is no end to what you will uncover...MORE...LINK

Sunday, May 23, 2010

Elena Kagan's socialist ideology dovetails nicely with her Jewish supremacism

Elena Kagan on the Jewish radical tradition in American politics
(Occidental Observer Blog) -- by Kevin MacDonald -- has some important material on Elena Kagan. Judicial Watch President Thomas Fitton notes the “most disturbing” parts of her senior thesis at Princeton are the following:
...Through its own internal feuding, then, the SP [Socialist Party] exhausted itself forever and further reduced labor radicalism…to the position of marginality and insignificance from which it has never recovered. The story is a sad but also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialism’s decline, still wish to change America.

…if the history of Local New York shows anything, it is that American radicals cannot afford to become their own worst enemies. In unity lies their only hope.
As Fitton says, “Do we really need a Supreme Court Justice who once lamented the lack of unity on the part of the Socialist Party?”

Judicial Watch had a link to Kagan’s thesis but it doesn’t work as of today. Her senior thesis is consistent with other historical studies in showing that the Socialist Party in New York in the early 20th century was a Jewish phenomenon. She notes that Jews were the backbone of the Socialist Party and that other ethnic groups, such as the Irish and Italians, could not be motivated to join even though they were in a similar economic situation.

Not only were Jews the backbone of the Socialist Party, socialism was very mainstream within the Jewish community. Her account parallels those of other historians who describe the Jewish community from 1890 to 1920 as “one big radical debating society” (see here, p. 71ff).
From [1886] on Jewish districts in New York and elsewhere were famous for their radical voting habits. The Lower East Side repeatedly picked as its congressman Meyer London, the only New York Socialist ever to be elected to Congress. And many Socialists went to the State Assembly in Albany from Jewish districts. In the 1917 mayoralty campaign in New York City, the Socialist and anti-war candidacy of Morris Hillquit was supported by the most authoritative voices of the Jewish Lower East Side: The United Hebrew Trades, the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, and most importantly, the very popular Yiddish Daily Forward. This was the period in which extreme radicals—like Alexander Berkman and Emma Goldman—were giants in the Jewish community, and when almost all the Jewish giants—among them Abraham Cahan, Morris Hillquit, and the young Morris R. Cohen—were radicals. Even Samuel Gompers, when speaking before Jewish audiences, felt it necessary to use radical phrases.
The result was a radical mainstream Jewish culture that persisted in New York and elsewhere into the 1960s and beyond. With the success of the Bolshevik Revolution, many Jews opted out of the Socialist Party, resulting in a Jewish Communist subculture that was also entirely mainstream within the Jewish community.

Kagan’s comments in her thesis suggest a sympathy with this radical Jewish culture — even a desire to carry it to fruition. Everything we know about her indicates that she continues to be immersed in a Jewish culture whose attitudes are well to the left of the American mainstream–a subculture that was hostile to the traditional people and culture of the US and has now become a hostile elite.

This fits well with Kagan’s childhood in New York’s Upper West Side — described by Dan Freedman as “as conservative’s worst nightmare.” During her college years she wrote, “Where I grew up _ on Manhattan’s Upper West Side _ nobody ever admitted to voting for Republicans.”
Elena Kagan and many of this culture’s children emerged from the Upper West Side political cauldron as committed to making the world a better place for all, mindful that everyday people can affect change as teachers, doctors, lawyers _ and, yes, even journalists _ and make government work for the common good.
There is no indication that Kagan has changed her views, and there’s not much doubt that indeed she will be a judicial activist on the left. Fitton quotes from her Oxford thesis:
As men and as participants in American life, judges will have opinions, prejudices, values. Perhaps most important, judges will have goals. And because this is so, judges will often try to mold and steer the law in order to promote certain ethical values and achieve certain social ends. Such activity is not necessarily wrong or invalid.
Well, at least we know what we can expect when Kagan gets on the court...LINK

“judges will often try to mold and steer the law in order to promote certain ethical values and achieve certain social ends.”

Chris Moore comments:

The “ethical value” that Jewry seeks to achieve is Jewish supremacism by way of totalitarian government. The “social ends” Jewry seeks achieve is a transfer of wealth to itself by way of Statist-Corporatism.

The “social justice” facade of socialism has always been a pretext to achieve those ends by drawing Gentile liberals into support for the “socialist” (read Jewish-supremacist) agenda.

It’s no coincidence that the bigger American government has gotten, the more Jewish supremacist it has gotten, to the point where we’re now sacrificing large quantities of American blood and treasure in wars for Israel, and plundering our own economy to keep Wall Street Zionists in the high life.

The main appeal of “liberalism” to Jewry is that is comprised of those who are just plain dumb, easily suckered, easy prey, and with a nihilistic chip on the shoulder. And today it's even managed to draw in right-wing Dispensationalists of a similar stripe.


@ AngryJew [in article comments]: “What I am banging my drum on about is that we are White, and simply because someone is Jewish, they should not be excluded from the movement. In fact there should be Jewish outreach. But its impossible with a priori rejections.”

C’mon. Be hones with yourself. Jews don’t see themselves as whites any more than they see themselves as Christians. Whites and white Christians were the ones who have supposedly been persecuting them for 2,000 years, hence Marxism (largely inspired upon Marx and Engels by Jewish Zionist Moses Hess), hence Jewish Bolshevism, hence Communist mass murder, hence the Holocaust as a pre-emptive strike…but I suppose it could really all be traced back to Jewry’s attempt to exterminate Christianity in the cradle (not only Jesus, but Christianity in its entirety even following Jesus), which is what started the pattern.

@ Mark [in article comments]: "Capitalism is a far more “progressive” system than socialism ever was. I think Fitton and other “conservatives” like him should be much more concerned about Kagan’s Jewish-friendly capitalism than her “really non-existing socialism.”

I agree Capitalism is totally out of control in America, but what we really have is more a system of State Capitalism/Statist Corporatism, where Big Government essentially picks and makes the winners based upon crony connections (the ultimate example being the Fed/Goldman Sachs, but there are thousands of others). This is very different from free market capitalism, in which government seeks to chop down monopolies and keep the money flowing to all corners of society by encouraging small business and “breaking” the insatiably greedy Corporatists, who love nothing more than to whore out their own countrymen for a nickel.

@ Daybreaker [in article comments]: "There’s no common movement of Jews and non-Jewish Whites, other than self-hating Whites following a leftist, White-destructive agenda. I don’t care of that movement is hurt, or rather I hope it is hurt."

Actually, there is a movement along the lines of what AngryJew is pining for; it's called neoconservatism. And although not explicitly white, it has most of the characteristics of what AngryJew is angling for -- which is another good reason not to go down that road. The neocons were/are mostly comprised of Jewish nationalists looking to triangulate "conservatism" for their own Zionist purposes, because they felt the Democrats had become too soft to ever be willing to start wars for Israel (as opposed to merely enforcing the status-quo of the outcome of wars that the Right already completed, ie Clinton enforcing the sanctions against Iraq). And their plan worked masterfully, as Bush II’s invasion of Iraq (largely instigated by the Israel lobby and the neocons) makes clear.

Why do I suspect that AngryJew and his ilk are attempting to play a similar game? If Jews were ever to be allowed into the white consciousness movement, I can almost guarantee that in less than a generation, the whites would be fighting yet another war for Israel, and the “white” Jews would be laughing all the way to the bank.

Friday, May 21, 2010

A hostile elite steps into leadership of America (yet some still claim left-liberalism is enlightened)

Philip Weiss: “The American Jewish revolution is over”

(Occidental Observer Blog) -- by Kevin MacDonald --

...[Philip Weiss'] article “Lame Specter, Blumenthal, and Kagan show — the American Jewish revolution is over” extends his critique of Jews to their role in the contemporary American elite. The basic message is that Jews in America started out as morally aggrieved outsiders who have ultimately morphed into symbols of the worn out establishment (Arlen Specter), liars (Richard Blumenthal), and calculating achievers and hacks (Elena Kagan).

Although I am far less romantic about the Jewish left and its moral imperative of revolution against the traditional people and culture of America than Weiss is, he certainly does understand that the new Jewish elite is fundamentally corrupt. This Jewish elite consists of people like Adam Kirsch “who steps into the New Yorker and all the other magazines with an air of entitlement, and who can blame him, Jews run the important magazines, with all the passion of printing a train timetable.”

Notice that Kirsch “steps into” his job at the New Yorker – his position as the editor of an elite publication simply handed to him as part of his Jewish entitlement. No need for struggle or for particularly great qualifications. Jews have arrived.

Kagan too “stepped into” her position as Supreme Court nominee. Her only qualifications are being Jewish and knowing the right people. The entire passage bears quoting:
Kagan is the ultimate sign that our brand is finished. She is the best of breed, as they say at Westminster. According to this Times profile, she comes out of the same hothouse I came out of, in her case the Upper West Side. Achievement, liberalism, and no partying. Arguing at the dinner table. Presumably no physical life. [Interesting comment on what it means to be Jewish. On the other hand, there's that famous photo in the WSJ of her playing softball.] …

Kagan’s world is the Jewish success world, she stepped into it like Kirsch did. She loved the hothouse. She emulated Felix Frankfurter, who didn’t stand for much either, and is pals with Sarah Walzer,daughter of Michael Walzer, the political theorist and Jewish parochialist. She went to Jeffrey Toobin’s wedding, she was picked by Larry Summers at Harvard around the time he was saying that divestment was anti-semitic. Eliot Spitzer, Ted Weiss and Elizabeth Holtzman were among her backers. She clerked for Abner Mikva, a Chicago macher who backed Obama.
It’s a Jewish world — a world where being in the right circles counts far more than genuine talent. Kagan, the Harriet Miers of the Obama Administration, simply “steps into” her position in the top court in the land.

This reminds me of Jews as an elite in the Soviet Union, where a nascent Jewish elite motivated by moral fervor and hatred unleashed by their exclusion under the Czar morphed easily into a corrupt, nepotistic elite that was hostile to the traditional people and culture of Russia. A report to the Soviet Central Committee reminds me of Kagan’s route to success: “They gather around themselves people of the same nationality, impose the habit of praising one another (while making others erroneously believe that they are indispensable), and force their protégés through to high posts” (see here, p. 78). Another report, from 1942, noted that elite cultural institutions “turned out to be filled by non-Russian people (mainly by Jews)” (see here , p. 51, ff). For example, of the ten top executives of the Bolshoi Theater—the most prestigious Soviet cultural institution—there were eight Jews and one Russian. Similar disproportions were reported in prestigious musical conservatories, the Soviet Academy of Science Institute of Literature, and among art and music reviewers in elite publications. Ethnic nepotism, not IQ, is the only way to explain these disproportions.

So now we are looking at a Supreme Court that is one-third Jewish–another disproportion that can’t be explained by Jewish IQ but reeks of ethnic nepotism. The ADL will of course attempt to squelch anyone who talks about the new Jewish elite publicly. But as time goes on, it’s going to be more and more apparent who runs the US...MORE...LINK
MacDonald: “This reminds me of Jews as an elite in the Soviet Union, where a nascent Jewish elite motivated by moral fervor and hatred unleashed by their exclusion under the Czar morphed easily into a corrupt, nepotistic elite that was hostile to the traditional people and culture of Russia.”

Chris Moore comments:

As MacDonald knows and has written, more than “hostile” — mass murderous. And gratuitously, sadistically and sub-humanly so.

Weiss is to be commended, as he has been on the vanguard of Jews criticizing institutional Jewish supremacism. This couldn’t have been an easy or pleasant journey. My hunch is that in addition to Palestine, his journey was also driven by the fact that he’s married to a WASP, as he has written regularly (I want to say she’s a Quaker, but I think mostly post-Christian liberal), and realized how much bigotry there was in the Jewish community even against WASPS.

Weiss may hate Zionism, but the problem is that as a lefty, he essentially glorifies Bolshevism, which as we all know is just left-wing Jewish supremacism, (but which Weiss can’t face). Look at who he holds up as icons before Jewry was corrupted (apparently by its own greedy, ethno-religous culture):

“When I was a kid we were outsiders and had that fierce energy. My mother praised the Rosenbergs to me. Izzy Stone changed his name but he was a Communist too. Norman Podhoretz studied English literature like the talmud and brought his ethnic fury into the discourse…Back when, Robert Gottlieb was weird and loved Doris Lessing and discovered Haruki Murakami and didn’t gaze into the mirror of his success.) Alan Dershowitz was filled with fury at Derek Bok, when Bok ran Harvard Law School, and called him an anti-semite; Dershowitz also was a poor boy from Brooklyn with the element of surprise. But that was a long time before Martha’s Vineyard.”

The problem is A) Weiss doesn’t want to see that Leftism/liberalism is just a stalking horse for Jewish supremacism and always has been, designed to soften up Western society for Jewish infiltration and subjugation; and B) Weiss acts like he’s being righteous by rejecting religious Jewish supremacism in favor of a vision of Leftist, post-religious Jewry. This is like Nietzsche (a guy that would horrify Weiss) congratulating himself for rejecting Christianity.

@ Angry Jew [in article comments]: “The higher the IQ, the higher the probability that it is Jewish. In fact, I am willing to bet that above 135 you will have 25 Jews for every non-Jew…I’ve seen tons of Jews who were in places where no possible nepotism was possible, and still they were on top. They were promoted by their gentile brethren.”

Sociopaths always have an advantage in terms of obtaining material and professional success because they lack conscience and are willing to engage in tactics, techniques and chicanery to scratch their way to the top that no sane or decent person would ever consider. Also, Jewish and Gentile sociopaths help each other.

The moral and ethical IQ of organized Jewry and its collaborators is probably the lowest on the planet.

Zionist Jewry's (oversized) role in selling a policy of permanent war in the Arab world as an American interest

The continuing power of Walt & Mearsheimer

(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

Ezra Klein has an interesting note about Walt and Mearsheimer. He reports that Jon Chait of the New Republic started writing about Israel because of Walt and Mearsheimer, he was so angry about them; and Klein says he also was drawn into the topic by Walt and Mearsheimer, the Chait-ian reaction against them, which he regarded as "fearful tribalism." Talk about the power of ideas.

I'm in Klein's camp. I started writing this blog in March 2006 just before W&M published their incredible paper. I'd finally decided to write about Israel (after avoiding the topic all my life) because of a comment a relative made to me in 2003: "What do you think about this war [Iraq]? I demonstrated against the Vietnam War, but my Jewish newspaper says this war could be good for Israel." I was shocked and disturbed by the comment. But it was Walt and Mearsheimer who gave me courage. Their bombshell paper echoed the political truth of my relative's statement. Walt and Mearsheimer said that the neocons, the braintrust for George Bush's disastrous war, were motivated by Zionism. I remember the day Scott McConnell emailed the paper to me, he had gotten it from Mike Desch that morning, in Texas. The shock of recognition went round the world.

The reaction was vicious. "In Dark Times Blame the Jews," the Forward wrote at the time, a disgraceful headline. Yivo Institute held a panel to denounce the authors as anti-Semites.

Chait was defensive but Klein is not defensive. And Klein will win. Some day there will be an open conversation inside the Jewish community about the Jewish role in the Iraq war, specifically, ultra-Zionists' role in selling a policy of permanent war in the Arab world as an American interest. Peter Beinart just further opened the door to this conversation by making it clear that his politics are fueled by Zionism, Beinart who pushed the Iraq war as "the good fight"--a book in whose index the words Israel and Palestine did not appear.

Agree with them or not, Walt and Mearsheimer's book changed the discourse. They blew the bridge. They opened up a space where no one said you could go. Two realists, they spoke feelingly about the Nakba and the humiliations of the occupation--which all the liberals like Beinart and Ken Pollack and Lawrence Kaplan and Paul Berman had dismissed out of hand...MORE...LINK

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Obama a golem created and promoted by organized Jewry to destroy vestiges of non-Zionist Gentile leadership?

Yesterday AND Today
(Real Zionist News) -- By Brother Nathanael Kapner --

AT A CONFERENCE IN ISRAEL LAST AUTUMN, Jewish billionaire and media mogul, Haim Saban, announced his formula for influence peddling.

As if taken straight from the Jewish Manifesto for world conquest, “The Protocols Of The Learned Elders of Zion,” Saban outlined the very same blueprint as laid down by the learned elders over a century ago.

Describing his influence peddling in ‘protocol’ fashion, Saban specified three ways for Jews to be influential in American politics: “Make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media outlets.” In articulating his program, Saban said nothing different than what the Protocols put forth some one hundred years before...

AMONG ITS PLANS FOR JEWISH WORLD DOMINATION, the Protocols called for Jewish control of the press and media, hegemony over international banking, creation of a Jewish academic class, and the manipulation of the political process.

As we note the current Jewish control of the media, (which Jewry itself admits although they removed the damning article by Ben Stein), we must also monitor Jewish manipulation of the political life of all “democratic” nations.

By destroying the aristocracy, “the only defense of the Goyim,” as stated in the opening chapter of the Protocols, Jewry has succeeded in creating the political system of democracy in which the representatives of the herd are bought-and-paid-for by the Jews.

A recent example of this Jewish practice of ‘buying influence’ is evidenced by Obama’s rise to power…from a nobody, to senator, then to president…in three Jewish-bought steps.

How did an unknown, black communist agitator in Chicago, ascend the political ladder so easily? By Jewish money putting into effect the dictates of the Protocols, that’s how.

IN A 2008 ARTICLE in the Chicago Jewish News, “Obama And The Jews,” prominent Jewish figures are quoted as saying: “Jews made Obama. Wherever you look there is a Jewish presence.”

That presence began when the daughter of Real Estate maven Phillip Klutznik, Betty Lu Saltzburger, (known as the behind-the-scenes champion of Obama’s political career), put her money where her mouth was.

After meeting Obama in 1991, Saltzman said to her husband, “He’s going to be our first black president.” As her involvement with Obama grew, Saltzman remarked, “He’s right on all the issues when it comes to Israel. Obviously I’m not going to support someone who is opposed to Israel.”

Working closely with fellow Jewish leftist, Marilyn Katz, Saltzman funded Obama’s political ascendancy with a “protocol goal” in mind: Weaken the White Christian power bloc by installing a leftist-leaning black into the upper echelons of American political life.

Saltzman soon hired David Axelrod of the political consultancy group, Axelrod & Associates, to begin a media-program which would realize her dream of installing the first black president.

Grooming the young black activist, Saltzman and Axelrod found a means of bringing the unknown Obama into the halls of Capitol Hill in the 2004 Illinois Senate race.

How did they catapult an unproven figure into national prominence? By the political merits of the senatorial aspirant? Not at all - Obama had no political credentials whatsoever. They used instead an underhanded scheme of SMEARING the contending Democrat candidate, Blair Hull.

Through their Jewish connections in high legal places, Saltzman and Axelrod brought Hull’s SEALED divorce proceedings to light and then LEAKED their damaging contents to the public, thus forcing Hull to withdraw his candidacy.

The VERY SAME THING happened to the Republican contender, Jack Ryan, when Axelrod leaked to the Chicago Tribune an alleged “sex club involvement,” forcing Ryan to drop out of the race. This left Alan Keyes as the Republican candidate, an obvious loser against the media-hyped Obama...MORE...LINK

Another phony "liberal" Jewish-American Zionist comes out of the closet as a separatist

From: So much for bringing democracy to the Middle East(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss

Peter Beinart once published a book called The Good Fight: Why Liberals--and Only Liberals--Can Win the War on Terror and Make America Great Again. Well there is a lien on Beinart's liberalism. Here he is reflecting on his late splash, a piece on American Jews and Zionism, to Jeffrey Goldberg:

"I'm not asking Israel to be Utopian....I'm not even asking it to allow full, equal citizenship to Arab Israelis, since that would require Israel no longer being a Jewish state. I'm actually pretty willing to compromise my liberalism for Israel's security and for its status as a Jewish state."

Frank, helpful. Remember that 20 percent of Israel's population is Palestinian, far more than blacks in the U.S. (let alone 4 million under occupation). Beinart's watershed (for the Jewish community) piece was published in the New York Review of Books, a great edifice of the American left...LINK

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Two-faced "liberal" U.S. Jews have always been the linchpin of American support for the Jewish supremacist state of Israel

From: The Changing Face of American Zionism
(lobelog) -- by Daniel Luban --

...I think that both supporters of Christian Zionism like Mead and critics like Yglesias underestimate just how crucial support within the educated and affluent liberal mainstream of American Jewry has been in sustaining the special relationship; as a result, they overestimate the extent to which growing Christian Zionist support can unproblematically substitute for dwindling Jewish support. This is a case where merely looking at crude poll numbers, as Mead is fond of doing, can mislead us. For one thing, they show only breadth of support, not depth. It may be that large numbers of Christians are willing to answer “yes” to the poll question “do you support Israel?”, but this tells us very little about levels of actual commitment translating into political action. Some, like John Hagee and his followers, are no doubt exceptionally committed to the Greater Israel project, but they are by all indications a minority even among conservative evangelicals.

But more importantly, poll numbers fail to indicate influence. U.S. support for Israel has never been about the raw number of Israel’s supporters, but rather the fact that these supporters tended to make up an enormous part of the American political, intellectual, and economic elite. It was this influence, not raw numbers, that helped the Jewish community spearhead what Alan Dershowitz called “perhaps the most effective lobbying and fund-raising effort in the history of democracy.” This influence was manifested not only in support among actual Jews, but among the Gentile elites who lived in the same suburbs, went to the same colleges, and worked in the same offices as Jewish supporters of Israel. And it was manifested not only in obvious measures like campaign contributions, but in subtler ways of shaping media discourse and setting the political agenda.

Thus, even if Israel does manage to replace every lost Jewish supporter with a Christian Zionist supporter, there is every reason to believe that this demographic shift would still have enormous ramifications for the future of the U.S.-Israel relationship. In terms of concrete impact on policy, gaining ten less-affluent and less-educated evangelical supporters in Texas or Alabama does not make up for the defection of a single Peter Beinart or Haim Saban. (I don’t intend to sound snobbish here; in fact, I think that the ways in which the American political system limits the influence of its poorer and less-connected citizens is one of its least attractive aspects. I am simply stating brute facts.)

But this means that supporters of the old special relationship should not get too sanguine about the possibility of replacing the old liberal Jewish base with an influx of Christian Zionists. Even if this influx continued — which is far from inevitable, since Christians are watching the same political developments in Israel/Palestine as Jews are, and could very well become similarly disillusioned — it is unlikely that the special relationship can survive without its traditional base of liberal Jewish support...MORE...LINK

Chris Moore comments:

If it's true, as Luban says, that "it is unlikely that the special relationship can survive without its traditional base of liberal Jewish support" (which means "liberal" U.S. Jewry has indeed always been the linchpin to American support for Jewish supremacism in Israel) then his statement begs the question: how "liberal" has U.S. Jewry ever really been? (For an answer to that, see the post directly below.) Indeed, how "liberal" have all those "Gentile elite" Judeophile liberals who lived in the same suburbs, went to the same colleges, and worked in the same offices as Jewish supporters of Israel" ever really been?

So much of American "liberalism" isn't liberalism at all, but at best, soft Marxist, Statist left-liberalism, and at worst, totalitarian Bolshevism. And as readers of this site know, there is no contradiction between Bolshevism and Zionism -- both of which are Jewish supremacist causes. All of which means lefties opposed to Zionism are either confused, stupid, or political imbeciles, because Zionism or phenomenons like it is where leftism leads, nearly inevitably. (For example, see the left-wing, racist, tribal, Israel lobby-modeled, Mexico-first group La Raza.)

American melting pot-undermining, victimist tribal supremacism -- vice of the stunted Left, actualization of the stunted Left.

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Jewish "liberal" pose has in reality always been a self-serving ethnic strategy used to gouge-out U.S. Protestant leadership in favor of Jews

John Mearsheimer and the Future of Israeli Apartheid
(The Occidental Observer) -- by Kevin MacDonald --

John Mearsheimer has given a fascinating prognosis of the situation in Israel. The basic argument is as follows... {jump}
·An apartheid Israel is non-viable for several reasons: The information freely available on the Internet; continued outrage among the Arabs and Muslims; because it is “antithetical to core Western values”; because it endangers American lives; and because most American Jews will not back it.

·Elaborating on the last point, he divides American Jews into three groups, “righteous Jews” (liberals like Norman Finkelstein and Philip Weiss who are critical of Israel), “the great ambivalent middle,” and the “new Afrikaners” — people like Abe Foxman and Elie Wiesel whose views are identical to those of the politically dominant ethnonationalist government in Israel. At the very least, the new Afrikaners will support Israel no matter what it does.

·Although the organized Jewish community is now dominated by the new Afrikaners, this will not last because Jews, like other Americans are ill-informed about the extent of Israeli apartheid. “This situation, however, is unsustainable over time. Once it is widely recognized that the two-state solution is dead and Greater Israel is a reality, the righteous Jews will have two choices: support apartheid or work to help create a democratic bi-national state. I believe that almost all of them will opt for the latter option, in large part because of their deep-seated commitment to liberal values, which renders any apartheid state abhorrent to them.”
This is where I part ways with Mearsheimer. It is certainly true that Jewish activist organizations like the ADL are constantly going into high dudgeon at the very mention that Israel is an apartheid state. Any such assertion is regarded as an “extreme anti-Israel rhetoric” by the ADL and has the effect of shaping the views of ordinary Jews and preventing them from acknowledging Israeli apartheid as it already exists.

But how is this going to change? The reality is that American Jews are quite comfortable with a morally schizophrenic view in which they have vastly different moral standards when it comes to Israel versus the US. This has been going on for a long time — to the point that I started a recent blog by writing, “Finding examples of Jewish double standards and hypocrisy vis-à-vis their attitudes about Israel and the US is like shooting fish in a barrel. But their posturing on the Arizona immigration law is particularly egregious.” Recall that opposition to Arizona-type laws spans the entire organized Jewish community in the US, despite the fact that such practices are routine in Israel.

Jewish moral particularism is a powerful reality among Jews. Mearsheimer takes Jewish liberalism in America and throughout the West at face value, as representing “deepseated commitment to liberal values” that is central to Judaism itself.

In accepting this, Mearsheimer is taking people like Gideon Aronoff of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society at face value — always a bad idea. The HIAS declares,
Drawing strongly on Jewish tradition, we provide services to Jewish immigrants, refugees, and others in need – without regard for their religion, nationality, or ethnic background. We are guided by our Jewish values and texts. The Torah (Hebrew Bible) tells us 36 times in 36 different ways to help the stranger among us. This, and our core belief that we must “fix the world” (tikkun olam, in Hebrew), are the driving principles behind our work.”)
Aronoff makes it sound as though Jewish advocacy of immigration is part of a deep ethical commitment that goes to the heart of Judaism. But of course he never attempts massive resettlement of non-Jews into Israel, nor does he agonize about Israel's biologically-based immigration laws. His moral posturing is entirely directed at the US. Even a casual look at traditional Jewish society shows it to be highly authoritarian, with no concept of individual rights or free speech and deeply concerned about the racial purity of all group members. However one interprets the Torah, Jewish society has never welcomed the stranger, and that is certainly true of Israel.

Jewish commitment to liberalism in the West has been all about ethnic hardball, not about high-flown moral values. Jewish liberalism is the cutting edge aimed at displacing previously dominant WASP elites and their culture. It is not motivated by a moral universalism of human rights — a philosophy that is utterly foreign to the Jewish tradition. Rather, it is motivated by fear and loathing of the traditional peoples and cultures of Europe — and the desire to become a dominant elite.

Obviously, the vast majority of Israelis fail to hold liberal values, and historically the common denominator of Jewish behavior in traditional societies has been alliances with elites, often rapacious alien elites. Jewish radicals in the Soviet Union became "Stalin's Willing Executioners," perpetrating the greatest mass murders of the 20th century, and the Jewish left in the US rationalized or ignored it for decades. Indeed, the remnants of the Jewish left in the US are far more concerned about the imagined excesses of McCarthyism than they are about the horrific deeds of their co-ideologues in the Soviet Union.

The result is that Jewish liberalism is far better seen as ethnic strategizing rather than a core ethical commitment...MORE...LINK

Chris Moore comments:

The Jewish "liberal" pose has in reality always been a self-serving ethnic strategy used to gouge-out U.S. Protestant leadership in favor of Jews...and it's a strategy that has worked to a "T" as epitomized by the recent sequence of events revolving around the last Protestant retiring from the Supreme Court and (the Jewish-dominated) Obama administration tapping (yet another) Jew as his replacement.

And all those white-liberal airheads thought this entire time that Jewry was working with them towards a common goal of liberal universalism. (I doubt that non-white "liberal" ethnics were ever quites so naive, although they are equally complicit.) Why, despite their "intellectual" pretensions, white liberals are just as dumb as the white Dispensationalists who believe "conservative" Jewry is working with them towards a vision of "Judeo-Christianity."

Or perhaps in all cases, its not stupidity at all, but rather a conscientious, free will decision to spurn traditional Western values and Christianity in favor of the easy life of gobbling down the poisonous fruits that Jewry and its money and power-worshipping collaborators dangle in front of their bedazzled eyes. Whatever the case, they've all made a conscious choice, and will have to either live (and die) with the consequences, or work their corrupted asses off to set things right.

God knows I've done what I could.

Saturday, May 15, 2010

The Zio-Bolshevik complex: arch-Jewish Zionist and Democrat Party big-wig Haim Saban verifies that Rahm Emanuel is a left-wing agent of Israel

(By Chris Moore) -- Israeli-American Haim Saban, who is one of the biggest donors to the Democratic Party and also an arch-Zionist, notes that Rahm Emanuel, Obama's right-hand man, and part of the Jewish Zionist braintrust running the Obama administration and setting its policy, is essentially a confirmed agent of Israel and left-wing Jewish supremacism. (Saban quotes him as saying "I am more hawkish than 50 percent of the people in Israel.") Of course, this is no surprise, given that Obama himself is essentially a creation of the Chicago branch of the Zio-Bolshevik complex, "and his political career is a product of a Westside Chicago Ashkenazi network with roots that trace directly back to organized crime of the 1920s," according to Jeff Gates.

From a program on Saban by Channel Ten Israeli TV (via Mondoweiss):
Saban: The situation is a disaster [the word used was the Arabic Harta, which has a coarser connotation], if you want me to put it in simple words.

[Correspondent Gil] Tamari: He compares the relations with Obama to the difficult years Israel had with George Bush Sr.

Saban: We had the days with Bush Sr., with Shamir. We got over it and moved on and we had 16 great years with Clinton and then with Bush, and this too shall pass. Look, I don’t think Obama is anti-Israeli, like people think he is. His goal is to achieve peace, just like our goal is to achieve peace. The way he wants to do it may not be the way some people in Israel would like it, and especially the members of the right.

Tamari: Saban, who donated millions to the Clintons as well, is not at all happy with what he sees. Did you have a chance to talk about this with Hillary?

Saban: I had the chance to talk to Hillary about a lot of things including this and I also talked to Rahm Emanuel and Rahm Emanuel for instance told me ‘I am more hawkish than 50 percent of the people in Israel.’ I don’t know where he got that survey but that is what he said. They are not anti-Israelis. Look, they are from the left. The left, left of which there is not much space to the wall, I agree, and this is their ideology.
So on the one hand, arch-Zionist Saban is claiming Israeli-American relations are "a disaster" right now, on the other he seeks to mend the supposed rift by claiming that Israel and the Obama administration both want to "achieve peace." What Saban is seeking to accomplish here is the preservation of the Zio-Bolshevik complex, which heretofore has been so successful in fomenting Israel-first U.S. foreign policy, and even instigating wars on Israel's behalf with useful idiots like the "conservative" Bushcons as front men who could take the fall if things went awry (as was ultimately the case).

Here are a few facts from Saban's biography on Wikipedia for those unfamiliar with how big a component within Zionism, American left-liberalism and neoliberalism Saban really is:

--Haim Saban (Hebrew: חיים סבן, born 15 October 1944 in Alexandria, Egypt[1]) is an Israeli-American television and media proprietor. With an estimated current[update] net worth of $2.8 billion, he is ranked by Forbes as the 102nd richest person in America.

--On July 23, 2001, it was announced that he and [production partner Rupert Murdoch's] News Corporation would sell [their partnership] Fox Family Worldwide Inc for $5.3 billion to The Walt Disney Company. and on October 24, 2001, the sale was completed[7] and the network was renamed ABC Family. Saban, as an individual, profited about $1.6 billion from this sale. This is the largest transaction between a company and a private citizen ever.

--Saban, in a 2004 New York Times interview, ascribed his interest in politics to his concern for Israel: "I'm a one-issue guy and my issue is Israel."

--In pursuit of his concerns, Saban was described in 2004 as "throwing his weight and money around Washington and, increasingly, the world, trying to influence all things Israeli."

--Saban has donated to Israel's left-of-center Labor Party.

--Saban has been a large and consistent donor to the United States Democratic Party according to his mandatory Federal Election Commission filings.
For those unfamiliar with what Zio-Bolshevism is, think of it this way: the Zionists are comprised of Jewish supremacists of the Right, and the Bolsheviks are comprised of Jewish supremacists of the Left (as epitomized by "Stalin's willing executioners"). Zio-Bolshevism, then, is the axis of left-wing and right-wing Jewish supremacism that comprises so much of the neoliberal and neocon pro-Israel Jewish-American community, including virtually all of the Jewish Democrats in Congress and huge numbers of (mostly wealthy) Jews up and down the corrupt left-liberal establishment. There are also plenty of corrupt non-Jewish supporters/partners of Zio-Bolshevism, as epitomized by "I am a Zionist" Joe Biden and the Clintons.

Some might claim there is a contradiction between blatantly Jewish supremacist Zionism and supposedly universalistic-egalitarian Bolshevism, but this simply isn't the case. Tacit Jewish Bolshevik theory is that Jewry has achieved a unique and "enlightened" status by virtue of its supposed inordinate historical suffering, and is thus uniquely qualified and ordained by historical fiat to lead the unwashed masses to utopia.

Of course, this is all part of the Jewish supremacist scam and swindle, and part of a vast rationalization for subordinating huge sectors of the economy to Statist-Corporatist Zio-Bolshevik control via massive taxation and centralization, the fruits of which are then utilized to reinforce Jewish supremacism.

Useful idiot Goy lefties are thus incorporated into the Jewish supremacist juggernaut by way of Jewish Bolshevik swindlers like socialist Senator Bernie Sanders (who recently sabotaged Ron Paul's efforts at reining in the corrupt Fed by watering down his Audit the Fed bill to the point of impotence) and Noam Chomsky, yet another left-wing crypto-Jewish supremacist.

Thursday, May 13, 2010

From establishment "liberals" to neocon "conservatives," the Israel-first Zionist-complex ranges far and wide

Many Voices Singing One Song
( -- by Philip Giraldi --

Several weeks ago the redoubtable Charles Schumer of New York announced the Yahweh himself had anointed him Israel’s defender in the US Senate. In a radio interview Schumer explained "You know, my name …. comes from the word shomer, guardian, watcher. My ancestors were guardians of the ghetto wall in Chortkov. And I believe Hashem (God) actually gave me that name. One of my roles, very important in the United States senate, is to be a shomer — to be the shomer Yisrael. And I will continue to be that with every bone in my body …"

Schumer’s very interesting comments, suggesting that he has a rather narrow view of his responsibility to represent all the people of New York State, were not reported anywhere in the mainstream media. It was apparently not considered newsworthy that a Senator from the Empire State had pledged love and loyalty to a foreign country. Schumer’s affections are particularly noteworthy as he is being spoken of as the next Senate Majority leader if Harry Reid takes a well deserved fall in the midterm elections. Schumer is, of course, not alone in his sentiments. His colleague from New Jersey Frank Lautenberg, who has traveled to Israel more than 80 times, has also been called Israel’s Senator, though perhaps it should be one of Israel’s Senators as there are clearly multiple candidates. Who could exclude Joe Lieberman of Connecticut? If one includes only Schumer, Lieberman, and Lautenberg Israel still has more senators representing its interests than any state in the union.

Both Joe Biden and Sarah Palin effused about their love for Israel during their vice presidential debate in 2008. Many lower house federal legislators could rightly be termed Congressmen from Israel, including Howard Berman, Eric Cantor, Jerrold Nadler, Anthony Weiner, Shelley Berkley, and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen. Eliot Engel recently described Israel as the "best ally the United States has in the Middle East, but I would argue the best ally in the world"…adding that if the US pressures Israel "you’re going to hear it from me." Congresswoman Jane Harman actually agreed to help an Israeli intelligence officer by using her influence to derail the trial of two American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) officials. Harman is still sitting in her plush office on Capitol Hill instead of in jail, where she belongs.

But there is another category of Israel firster that differs from the homegrown variety. Has anyone wondered at the large number of foreigners who have somehow made their way into Washington’s think tank and media punditry industry? They are found most commonly at places like the Foundation for the Defense of Democracy, the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), the Hudson Institute, the Heritage Foundation, the Saban Center at Brookings, and, of course at the AIPAC-founded Washington Institute for Near Eastern Policy (WINEP). They come from Australia, Europe, and Israel itself but the one thing they all have in common is that they, like Schumer, love and protect Israel. If one were suspicious, it might be possible to wonder whether there is some kind of mechanism operating whereby advocates of Israel are hand-picked and godfathered through the system. With unusual persistence and a high level of resiliency, many of them eventually become the dominant voices at the various think tanks so that eventually no dissenting opinions are allowed. Hollywood billionaire Haim Saban’s money has turned the once moderate Brookings into an Israeli mouthpiece while AEI and Heritage, which used to be traditionally conservative bastions, have now become home bases for the neocon foreign policy...

Are these people dangerous? Well, maybe. Many foreigners have come to the United States to make their fortunes and there is nothing wrong with that. But, in this case, there would appear to be a certain unanimity of viewpoint and a marching in lock step that is just a tad disconcerting, particularly as it has helped shape the foreign policy narrative. There is no deviation from hard right Likud positions, never any criticism of Israel, and always complete agreement on the need to confront Iran militarily. One might reasonably ask to what extent it is a coordinated effort to steer Washington in a certain direction, not unlike the neocons in the Pentagon under President George W. Bush. In any event, the presence of so many self-styled agenda-driven "experts" possessing regular media access raises questions about the objectivity of the policy-making process in Washington. If you seed enough partisans into the system and they are all singing the same tune that is then played and replayed in the media even a whole parcel of lies can eventually seem to be the truth...MORE...LINK

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Jewish exceptionalism and its Leftist and Statist manifestations the "original sin" that has led to so much global conflict

(By Chris Moore) -- In the context of commenting on a couple of Jewish-critical posts from blogs like VDare and Occidental Dissent, left-leaning anti-Jewish Zionist blogger Xymphora asks:
"why are the white supremacists the only ones on top of these issues?"
I don't speak for or on behalf of white supremacists, but probably because other than on the Jewish question, Xymphora is an indoctrinated lefty, I think he completely misunderstands what white supremacism really is. Thus, my response:
I think what you are referring to as "white supremacists" is the fledgling white consciousness movement that is rising up in reaction to Jewish supremacists and La Raza-type racists -- who themselves are emulating the Jewish supremacists.

Once you understand that Nazism was largely a reaction to and mirror image of Jewish Bolshevism (Leftism and Communism themselves originally being elaborate Trojan Horses for Jewish supremacism) you will comprehend the phenomenon as an inevitable dialectic and outcome of the “original sin” of Jewish supremacism.

Why is the Left in general and left-liberalism in particular so gun shy about identifying and openly rebuking Jewish supremacism outside of Israel? Because the Left is built upon a vision of a patchwork of tribal, Jewish-like entities uniting to smite Christianity and Western Civilization -- a vision inspired by Jewry to begin with. Jewry is the Left's linchpin and key to the "intellectual" Left's agenda of nihilism, and always has been. But Jewry has played other Left tribes for the useful idiots they are, just as it played the Buschcons.

Jewry simply takes to an extreme what all tribalists seek to do, and what all stunted tribal elements that comprise the Left (and yes, the Statist-authoritarian Right, too) will ultimately attempt when allowed enough power: homicide of the “other.”

Was "scientific" liberal icon Freud really a Jewish supremacist who sought to smuggle Talmudic "morality" into the Western mainstream?

Did the Talmud influence Jewish supremacist Sigmund Freud with his theories on childhood sexuality?
( --

Sigmund Freud in his 1905 work Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, outlined a theory of psychosexual development with five distinct phases:
- The oral stage (0 - 1.5 years)
- The anal stage (1.5 - 3.5 years)
- The phallic stage (3.5 – 6 years) culminating in the resolution of the Oedipus conflict
- The Latency Phase (6–12 years of age)
- The genital, or adult stage
Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Sanhedrin Folio 54b
"Our Rabbis taught: In the case of a male child, a young one is not regarded as on a par with an old one; but a young beast is treated as an old one.23 What is meant by this? — Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that"

"Joseph Wortis based on an interview with Freud in 1935: Freud commented that he viewed gentiles as prone to “ruthless egoism,” whereas Jews had a superior family and intellectual life. Wortis then asked Freud if he viewed Jews as a superior people. Freud replied: “I think nowadays they are… When one thinks that 10 or 12 of the Nobel winners are Jews, and when one thinks of their other great achievements in the sciences and in the arts, one has every reason to think them superior”
Page 108
The Culture of Critique
Kevin MacDonald


Chris Moore comments:

Freud thought Gentiles were prone to "ruthless egoism" but simultaneously declared that the self-described "Chosen Ones" are "superior"? It seems he must have been projecting his own tribe's worst characteristics onto the Gentiles, and extrapolating from there. Also, many of Freud's own patients were Jewish, so most of his "scientific" conclusions were not scientific at all, but rather based on the psycho-analysis of a rather, ahem, psychologically skewed sampling -- although his conclusions are no doubt valid for the majority population that dwells in Israel (and probably Manhattan and Hollywood).

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

American success story, or anti-American ethnic collectivism? Jewry's long history of anti-assimilation, Zionist bigotry, and nepotism within the U.S.

The Jewish Path to Success
(Forward) -- By Adam Bellow --

...In the mid-19th century, when the first wave of German Jews arrived, itinerant peddlers named Seligman, Guggenheim, Levi, and Straus built their pushcart businesses into enormous dry-goods empires, bringing their relatives over to run their chain department stores. Later on, excluded from the white-shoe legal and financial firms of Wall Street, the Lehman, Kuhn, Loeb, Sachs and Goldman families created their own.

When millions of Russian and East European Jews arrived in the 1880s and 1890s, established Jewish families — obeying the ancient injunctions to Jewish charity enshrined in the Mosaic code — constructed an elaborate welfare system, including hospitals, orphanages, settlement houses and trade schools. Most of these immigrants went into the booming garment industry, putting their whole families to work and giving rise to a thriving ethnic economy in which Jewish factory owners employed Jewish workers to create goods sold by Jewish merchants to Jewish customers.

The immigrants also created dozens of landsmanschaft organizations that helped bring over new immigrants, settled them in jobs and provided welfare services for widows and orphans. Such communal and family ties lent solidarity and strength to the heavy Jewish presence in the labor movement.

During the 1920s and 1930s a group of hard-nosed Jewish entrepreneurs turned a patch of desert near Los Angeles into the Hollywood movie industry. Entertainment juggernaut Paramount Pictures, founded in 1919 by Adolph Zukor, was financed by an enormous loan from the Jewish Wall Street firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. — thanks to the intervention of Otto Kahn, brother of Zukor’s partner Felix Kahn. The studios were famed for their nepotism.

Jewish families also went into the media business, founding Random House, Knopf, Simon & Schuster and other distinguished publishing houses. And the Sulzberger-Ochs clan has owned and run The New York Times since 1896.

During the Depression, Jewish families pulled together once again, outdoing other groups in solidarity and mutual support. After World War II, Jews gained access to the middle class and moved to the suburbs, leaving their ethnic roots behind them. Yet Jews did not disperse throughout the economy like other immigrants but continued to congregate in medicine, law, academia and the communications industry, where relatively high numbers have afforded leverage and security.

Speaking at a recent seminar on Jewish women in television at New York’s Jewish Museum, Terri Minsky, creator of the hit series “Lizzie McGuire,” unapologetically remarked: “I got into TV the way I thought all Jewish people did — I had an uncle in the business.”

How can we square this long record of familial and ethnic nepotism with the public insistence of Jews on equal opportunity and merit?...MORE...LINK

Chris Moore comments:

Jewish exceptionalists -- from organized Jewry itself to left-liberal Judeophiles to "Christian" Zionist Dispensationalists just love to wax eloquent in the assertion that there is something miraculous or cosmically ordained about Jewry's success, or the "success" of the state of Israel. Jews "made the desert bloom," and "turned a patch of desert near Los Angeles into the Hollywood movie industry." They must really be history's chosen!

Indeed, it might be said that these many successful organized Jewish fiefdoms -- from the investment banks on Wall Street to the movie studios in Hollywood to the large enclaves within the MSM to the incredibly influential Israel lobby -- are nothing but miniature versions of the Zionist state of Israel themselves.

Yet, as it turns out, Jewish success can all be traced to ethnic collectivism -- the same kind of ethnic collectivism that transformed Nazi Germany into a force that nearly conquered the entire world. The same kind of ethnic collectivism that built the British Empire. The same kind of ethnic collectivism that enabled handfulls of Spanish Conquistadors to defeat vast armies of Aztecs and Incans in South America.

So yes, there certainly is power, cohesion and the potential for transformative success in ethnic collectivism, for those willing to play by that particular set of rules. But the idea behind the United States -- indeed behind the outcome of Western Civilization -- is that man should strive beyond the tribalism of self and seek the inalienable, natural, God-given rights of all men for all men.

And perhaps that's the real reason organized Jewry has always had such a tough time fitting into Western Civilization, and faced such hostility and contempt: post-tribalism is a vision it simply doesn't share; indeed, perhaps post-tribalism is a vision it is too narcissistic, self-important and supremacist to be capable of sharing. Certainly, its tenacious ethnic collectivism as epitomized by the enduring, self-supremacist ideology of Zionism seems to suggest as much.

But then it has the chutzpah to complain about the Nazis, who were merely Germans playing by the same ambitious, predatory, ethnic-collectivist, narcissistic set of rules as the Jewish supremacists.

Go figure...

Obama's win-win with Kagan: advance the authoritarian, Jewish supremacist "multicultural" agenda, appease the racist Jewish Zionists [updated]

Elena Kagan Gets the Nomination
(Occidental Observer Blog) --

It’s great to be Jewish in the year 2010. The latest evidence is the appointment of Elena Kagan as the third Jew on the Supreme Court. Philip Weiss puts it this way:
The Kagan appointment means that we have entered a period in which Jews are equal members, if not actually predominant members, of the American Establishment. Obama’s two closest political advisers are Jewish, Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod, and are said to be his foreign-policy braintrust. The economy is supervised to a large degree by Jewish appointees, Larry Summers and Fed Reserve Board chair Paul Bernanke (Time’s man of the year last year, a selection overseen by Rick Stengel, the Time magazine editor, who is also Jewish).
Of course, that’s just scratching the surface on Jewish representation among the elites in politics, law, the financial world, the media, and personal wealth. Weiss goes on to take the standard line that Jews have achieved so much because of their bookish culture. But if there’s anything that stands out about Kagan, it’s how utterly ordinary she is in terms of scholarly accomplishment or anything else that would qualify her for the court–very few publications, no experience as a judge, little courtroom experience – the Harriet Meyers of the Obama administration. (I stole that one from someone on the Rachel Maddow show, maybe Maddow herself. But it shows the depth of her inaptitude that even liberals are sensitive to it. For example, Paul Campos writes on the Daily Beast, “if Kagan is a brilliant legal scholar, the evidence must be lurking somewhere other than in her publications. Kagan’s scholarly writings are lifeless, dull, and eminently forgettable. They are, on the whole, cautious academic exercises in the sort of banal on-the-other-handing whose prime virtue is that it’s unlikely to offend anyone in a position of power.” Here’s my version: “When she received tenure at the University of Chicago in 1995, she had exactly two scholarly articles published in law journals — a record that would ordinarily not get her tenure even at quite a few third tier universities much less an elite institution like the University of Chicago.”)

Her only talent seems to be getting really prestigious jobs without any obvious qualifications apart from her ethnic background. And her appointment is a sure thing for the left: Whereas Republicans have been disappointed several times by nominees who converted into liberals (like John Paul Stevens), Kagan’s ethnic identity ensures that she is on the side of all things multicultural.

My take (see also here) is that this is an affirmative action appointment of someone who has benefited greatly from Jewish ethnic networking and has dangerous views on the First Amendment that are in line with the views of the ADL, the SPLC, and the rest of the organized Jewish community. (See also Patrick Cleburne’s post at

It’s amazing to see liberals expressing doubts about Kagan. She is clearly on the left, perhaps with some neocon tendencies regarding executive power. But that is hardly reassuring. Put these tendencies together and you have someone who could be very dangerous to an incipient racialist movement: Anti-”hate speech” and comfortable with using government power to suppress political action that conflicts with the aims of the regime.

Another thought that crossed my mind was that Obama and his advisers may have wanted to court Jews [bad pun] because of the fallout from the tensions with Israel. Despite the fact that, as John Mearsheimer recently noted, the confrontation with Israel was won hands down by Israel, a recent poll shows that American Jews are defecting from Obama in droves, with only 42% saying they would now vote for Obama (down from 83% who voted for him in 2008). A recent visit to the White House (”Obama Tries to Mend Fences with Jews“, NYTimes, May 4, 2010) by Elie Wiesel indicated shows that Obama sees a need to placate the Jewish community...MORE...LINK

Chris Moore comments:

The Jewish supremacy on the Statist Left has become so blatant, a child should be able to see it. Not only has it provided institutionally racist Israel a blank check to rape, plunder and murder the Palestinians for decades, and dutifully supported the American wars for Israel in the Middle East, no questions asked, but now it's not even bothering to go through the pretense of considering non-Jews for the most powerful, enduring and influential posts in government, but just blatantly inserting even the most unqualified of them to the top positions in the land, willy-nilly.

We really are resembling the early Bolshevik Soviet Union more and more every day. And as MacDonald points out, since no doubt Kagan will be a strong advocate of anti-"hate speech" laws "and comfortable with using government power to suppress political action that conflicts with the aims of the regime," it's painfully clear that she's just another Jewish Bolshevik/Zionist.

To assert that Obama is a Muslim or even a Christian has gone beyond the realm of farce to the point of absurdity. Like so many of these hyper-materialistic, hyper-ambitious post-modern goy elites within left-liberalism (and on the neocon/Bushcon Right), the man is nothing so much as a useful idiot for the Jewish supremacist agenda. You could practically call being a Shabbat goy for the Jews his religion.

There you go. Under the heading "religion," gentile Bushcons, neocons and left-liberal Obamunists should by rights all be jotting down the entry "Shabbat Goy."

Or is that actually a caste?


Angry Jew [in comments]: “if you want to keep on pushing Jews out, then what do you expect? I am a White Jew, and yet I am not welcome by either you, and by many many liberal Jews.”

Are you a Jewish supremacist? If so, you ARE indeed accepted by most “liberal” Jews, most of whom themselves are Jewish supremacist (albeit some slightly more attracted to the Bolshevik vein of Jewish supremacy than the Zionist vein).

Jewish collectivism is Jewish collectivism. It may hop back and forth between the Zionist (Right) and Bolshevik (Left) foot, but at their core, their center of gravity, Jewish collectivists are Jewish supremacists. The only variation is the means by which they assert their Jewish supremacy.

If Jewish collectivism advocated libertarian politics, as did America’s Protestant founders, that would be one thing. But it seems allergic to libertarianism, likely because of its authoritarian, control-freak religious and social culture, and its culture of greed.

This attempted claim that Jewish collectivists, whether Right or Left, don’t always ultimately circle the wagons around the self-serving Jewish supremacist cause is a canard, and an attempt at misdirection.

This is why, for example, Jews across the political spectrum have come out in favor of the totalitarian socialist Jew Kagan, whose own politics are simply a variation of Jewish neoconservatism.

This is why, for example, “conservative” Zionist Jew Netanyahu is building a shrine to the Bolshevik Red Army in Israel.
I might add, one doesn’t have to be Jewish to be a Jewish supremacist. Marxist Judeophile “liberals” and “Christian” Dispensationalist Zionists also believe that Jews are specially “chosen” or historically ordained for some special mission unto the dumb “nations”, and thus these are ready, willing, able and eager to betray their own people and countries on behalf of the cause of Jewish supremacy.

Treason runs deep in ALL Jewish supremacists.