Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Zionist-front New York Times hits a new low in Israel-first, warmongering "journalism"

‘NYT’ gives Israelis its magazine to make an attack on Iran ‘normal’

(Mondoweiss) -- by Phil Weiss and Matthew Taylor --

Two days ago the New York Times Magazine published a landmark in warmongering journalism, a huge article predicting and justifying an Israeli attack on Iran, written by Israeli journalist Ronen Bergman. Last night I went to dinner with a friend who knows nothing about these issues but who said she was sickened to read it. What follows are a number of others expressing similar outrage.

First from a smart friend:
The enormous article by Ronen Bergman in the Sunday Times magazine is a shocker. The cover, title and artwork all push the attack like crazy; the article itself is more sober--but he's had impressive access to all the Israeli leaders and ends by making Jeffrey Goldberg's 2010 prediction, only this time for 2012: Israel WILL attack before the end of the year. The recent piece by Ethan Bronner, very weird for the front page, assuring Americans that Israel was satisfied that the repercussions of an attack would be bearable--was really hype for this magazine article. All published to make the attack normal. To deflate in advance any anger from American military or the administration.

Here is the ad for it on the front page, bottom right of Sunday's paper: "For the first time since the Iranian nuclear threat emerged, the conditions for an Israeli assault have been met. With all other options for containment exhausted, will Israel attack Iran. And when?"

So... Bill Keller's weird little piece "Bomb Bomb Bomb Iran" was actually positioning him on the skeptical far left of the talk at the Times high command.
...Gary Sick describes the piece as sensationalist and misleading:

Will Israel Really Attack Iran? The real answer is no, they will not. But you would never figure that out by reading the New York Times.

The sensationalist article in the Sunday New York Times Magazine (Jan. 29) adds to the hysteria surrounding U.S. and Israeli relations with Iran. Ronen Bergman, a columnist with the leading Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, concludes that Israel will probably attack Iran this year.

He draws this fearful conclusion after recounting his discussions with key Israeli military and intelligence officials, present and former, who describe to him in great detail: (1) why Israel is incapable of conducting such an attack; (2) why such a foolhardy action would fail to stop Iran’s nuclear program; and (3) why it would actually leave the situation far worse than it is now.

Say what?

Not only is his conclusion at odds with virtually everything he produces as evidence, but there are some omissions in his analysis that regrettably have become predictably routine in talking about the Iranian nuclear program...
...Two comments from Times readers, near the top of the comment pile, express cynical skepticism:

Cristine Cordaro:
So Israel wants to lure the US into yet another war?
And Stu:
They'll do what they want whether or not the United States agrees with it. We should let them know that if they attack Iran, they're on their own. Israel should get no support from the US, either tactical or financial. We have our own problems.. Any assistance the United States gives Israel can only be in its best interests not ours.
But of course, that won't happen. Israel would never attack Iran without knowing, it will be supported by our politicians, who play to the vested interests here who put Israel’s interests above that of the United States.
Which begs the question of this ally of ours; exactly how many Israeli soldiers fought with the "coalition forces" in Iran and Afghanistan? Zero, of course.

Monday, January 30, 2012

Zionist Jew Larry Silverstein leveraged $15 million investment on Twin Towers made a few months before 9/11 into $7 billion insurance payout later

9/11 Truth: What Happened to Building 7

(YouTube.com) -- by clabckus --

Decades ago, Old Right, patriotic Jewish Americans were first to raise "dual loyalty" specter of dangerous "Israel first" Jewish Zionists

Putting Israel First

The War Party's Achilles' heel
(AntiWar.com) -- by Justin Raimondo --

...Today’s war propagandists have figured out a way to make the issue of American interests, as opposed to Israeli interests, go away, and that is by policing the language of the debate. Are you calling someone who wants to pursue Israeli interests over and above those of his or her own country an “Israel firster”? Well, then, you are “anti-Semitic,” you are employing the oldest “anti-Semitic tropes” and echoing “neo-Nazis,” who – James Kirchick assures us – are the originators of the phrase. This is the argument made by “progressive” Spencer Ackerman in a recent issue of the Tablet, in which he joins the neoconservative assault on Glenn Greenwald, M.J. Rosenberg, and four bloggers over at the Center for American Progress who got slapped down for daring to wield (or imply) this supposedly “toxic” phrase.

There’s just one problem with this argument: it isn’t true. Ackerman cites Kirchick as the authority in this matter, but as a researcher the man Time columnist Joe Klein called a “dishonest prick” and a cheap “propagandist” leaves much to be desired. Kirchick claims the phrase originated with Willis Carto’s Spotlight newspaper, a cesspool of anti-Semitism, but this is false: it originated, as one can see here, with Alfred M. Lilienthal, an anti-Zionist Jew who wrote several books in the early 1950s and 1960s, notably What Price Israel? Lilienthal’s 1953 book was brought out by Henry Regnery, the noted conservative publicist and pioneer publisher, whose press also printed a number of other anti-Zionist and pro-Palestinian works, including Freda Utley’s Will the Middle East Go West? – which presciently argued American support for Israel would alienate the Arab world – Road to Beersheba, a novel by Ethel Mannin which dramatized the plight of a conquered people imprisoned in their own land, and a collection of photographs and text by the Swedish photographer Per-Orlow Anderson, They Are Human Too, which, in Regnery’s words, “brought us face to face with the tragedy of the Arab refugees, whom he photographed crowded into the inhospitable Gaza strip.” Which brings to mind the old saw about “the more things change.” Yet another example of the changeless nature of our politics was described by Regnery, who reported in his Memoirs of a Dissident Publisher:

“One unexpected consequence of the book’s publication was the visit from an agent of the FBI, who had been sent to make some inquiries about its author.”

“This was,” continues Regnery, “one of the less serious calls by government agents of one kind or another that frequently followed the publication of a book that displeased some group or individual of influence.” Our witch-hunters will surely characterize Regnery’s sardonic remark as evidence that he, too, was another one of those awful “anti-Semites” – after all, he was implying the Zionist lobby had enough influence to call out the dogs of the FBI and sic them on a mere photographer.

Yet Regnery’s views, and those of his attendant authors, were hardly considered “subversive” back then: indeed, theirs was the standard conservative position on the state of Israel, which, back in the day, was an ally of the Soviet Union and a proudly socialist state. It is inconceivable, of course, that the Regnery Publishing Co. of today would put out anything remotely resembling Lilienthal’s work: not with the conservative movement of 2012 dominated by warmongering neoconservatives and nutty Christian Zionists who see support for Israel as divinely ordained. In 1949, however, when Lilienthal wrote “Israel’s Flag is Not Mine” for Readers Digest, his critique of Zionist propaganda was shared by mainstream conservatives as a matter of course...

It wasn’t any neo-Nazis, but Lilienthal, a political conservative and a devout Jew, who was the first to raise the question of “dual loyalty.” The “Israel Firster” meme originated, not with the neo-Nazi fringe, but with conservative Jews who, like Lilienthal, objected that:

“My one and only homeland is America. I am proud of my belief in the age-old Judaic concept of one God in Heaven and one Humanity here below. But my faith does not pull me into a feeling of narrowly tribal kinship with all others who worship God in this way. Whenever I read of Americans singing the Hatikvah, Israel’s national anthem, or see youth groups raising Israel’s flag beside the Stars and Stripes. I am outraged. For Israel’s flag and anthem are symbols of a foreign state; they are not mine.”

The Kirchicks, the Ackermans, the Goldbergs – and also the Cartos – want us to forget this heritage, which has been buried under the landslide of pro-Israel propaganda, because it challenges the premises of both the Israel-Firsters and the anti-Semites.

Lilienthal was no fringe character: a diplomat who worked in the State Department during the war, he served in the US Army in the Middle East, and was later a consultant at the founding conference of the United Nations. His opposition to Zionism as a political movement was initially shared by many if not most American Jews: see Jack Ross’s new book, Rabbi Outcast, for a biography of the most well-known figure in this movement, Rabbi Elmer Berger, which also serves as a detailed history of the American Council for Judaism, the organizational expression of this tendency. These Jews did not think it extraordinary that they would oppose the claims of a foreign government on their loyalties, and they warned – presciently, as it turned out – that American Jews would face charges of harboring dual loyalties because of the Zionists’ insistence that all Jews somehow owed allegiance to Tel Aviv...MORE...LINK

Saturday, January 28, 2012

Zionists crafted their subversive, ear-whispering, middleman role over the centuries into the art of political gangsterism they excel at today

Mafia Jews: Inside a Genuine Cabal

(Forward) -- by Lisa Keys --

Supermob: How Sidney Korshak and His Criminal Associates Became America’s Hidden Power Brokers
By Gus Russo
Bloomsbury USA, 592 pages, $34.95.

The Jewish people are instructed to be a “light unto the nations” — and what society could use more illumination than the underworld? So goes the story of mob lawyer Sidney Korshak, whose partnerships with Chicago gangsters led him to be named the most powerful lawyer in the world by the FBI. As part of his, er, “covenant,” he steered the mob toward a path of respectability, serving as its go-between with the white-collar world.

Sidney who, you ask? Those with a passing pop-culture familiarity with the Mafia know that Chicago was famous for its Italian Mafiosos, like Al Capone and Tony Accardo. New York City, of course, had its share of “tough Jews,” including Meyer Lansky and Bugsy Siegel. But for much of the past century, the real center of mob power was a Chicago-born Jewish lawyer — or so says investigative reporter Gus Russo in his new book, “Supermob: How Sidney Korshak and His Criminal Associates Became America’s Hidden Power Brokers.”

The Supermob — the term was coined by late Senate investigator Walter Sheridan — was, according to Russo, a group of mostly Jewish men who made a fortune by collaborating with Chicago’s underworld. Generally, these men took mob money and funneled it into such respectable outlets as real estate and the burgeoning film industry.

The fact that these men were Jewish is crucial to Russo’s story. His telling of the Supermob tale begins in the Pale of Settlement and quickly advances to the Lawndale section of Chicago, a place so crowded with Jews that it was known as “Kosher Calcutta.” There, living amid crowded streets and a corrupt civic landscape, is a band of young, first-generation immigrant Jewish kids who are determined to make it big in American life — at any moral price. These Jewish gangsters would never make the headlines; instead, they’d serve as the behind-the-scenes masterminds of the mob.

And according to Russo, this is the role that Jews traditionally played. “Throughout history,” he writes, “the Jews were never the public leaders; they were always the kingmakers and power brokers.They knew from experience that a Jew would not get a top spot, however low the level, because of the existing anti-Semitism, even in America. They were always aware that their wealth and position in society could be noticed and another pogrom would ensue. Thus they worked surreptitiously, choosing to focus on the substrata of a business or an event.”...MORE...LINK

Considering USS Liberty attack, Lavon Affair, and 9/11, does it really seem so far fetched that Zionist leaders would assassinate Obama?

Will Israel Assassinate Obama?

(YouTube.com) -- by drdduke --

Friday, January 27, 2012

Cowed Obama gives them everything they ask for and more, and demonic Diaspora Jewish Zionist fanatics still hiss venom and violence his way

Israeli Extremists in America

(YouTube.com) -- by iwillspyonyou --


Is it just me, or is there almost a demonic aura around some of these people? Maybe if we slowed the film down enough, we'd see demons fluttering around their heads. They seem to bring an evil aura with them wherever they go. Is that why they call themselves "the chosen"? It's hard to know whether they're captives, or channelers.

Judging from their demonic warmongering and other evil deeds, even after being handed everything they've ever wanted in America and more, I'd have to conclude that they and many of their supporters must be satanists.

And some people profess to wonder why America is going to hell in a hand basket. -- C.M.

Israeli and Diaspora Zionist nation has turned corrupt, pathetic U.S. establishment into a whipped, whimpering dog and a worldwide laughingstock

Obama’s Unshakable Bondage To Bibi

(RealZionistNews.com) -- by Brother Nathanael Kapner --

Gingrich's moneybags sugar daddy, billionaire "American" Zionist Jew casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, proudly and openly brags of being an Israel-firster

Sheldon Adelson 7-2-2010.wmv

(YouTube.com) -- by YosiBirnbaum --

Money quote: “I am not Israeli. The uniform that I war in the military, unfortunately, was not an Israeli uniform, it was an American uniform, although my wife was in the IDF...all we care about is being good Zionists, being good citizens of Israel, because even though I am not Israeli born, Israel is in my heart.”

Adelson clearly comes across as a sociopath, which is one thing he must have in common with Gingrich.

These pampered, chichenhawk, Israel-first, billionaire Jewish-American Zionist sociopaths and their treasonous "American" goyim boot-lickers are the bane of America, and the bane of civilized humanity.-- C.M.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Robert Reich, yet another liberal establishment Zionist Jew, goes to extreme lengths of self-censorship to camouflage his neo-fascist clique

Robert Reich pretends he’s stupid

(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

This is shocking and outrageous. Robert Reich, the former Labor Secretary now a professor of public policy, affects ignorance on the score of why Sheldon Adelson has given Newt Gingrich all that money. The long quote below is from his blog.

Reich suggests that Adelson's gift has to do with his casino interests. He does not mention Israel or Adelson's friendship with Netanyahu or his millions to Birthright or One Jerusalem (Adelson's cause leading up to 2000 election when he sought to sabotage the peace process). He cannot say what the Wall Street Journal states in the lead of a news story: "A shared interest in supporting Israel, fostered over 15 years, is at the heart of casino mogul Sheldon Adelson's support for Newt Gingrich's presidential bid."

This is an important moment because it epitomizes the refusal of intelligent, prominent liberal American Jews to acknowledge the role of the Israel lobby (let alone dime out their crazy cousins, the neocons)...MORE...LINK

Chris Moore comments:

When Weiss writes about "prominent liberal American Jews" and their refusal to acknowledge the role of the "Israel lobby" (a.k.a. the fascist Zionist racket) in the U.S., he's engaged in a bit of self-censorship/self-deception himself.

How so? Because Zionist Jews (who seem to comprise about 94% of U.S. Jews) aren't "liberal" at all, any more than neocon Jews are conservative.

No, they're all ethno-religious fascists, and always were. Their feigned liberalism or conservatism was camouflage from the very beginning, a sort of mask they wear and pose they strike to fool the Goyim suckers that they prey upon as they ethnically network their way to the top of various Gentile institutions, and then wring them for all they're worth in order to advance the self-serving, particularistic Zionist agenda.

There is no way that this could ever have happened in a country with an authentically secular Western and spiritually Christian leadership and elite, instead of the greedy, Judeo-Christian Zionist buffoons on the right, and the greedy, Holocaustianity-worshipping Judeophile liberal buffoons on the left, all of whom pass themselves off as the "responsible" mainstream (apparently as opposed to the "extremist" critics of their fascist Zionist racket).

Some people grind their teeth at what these neo-fascist, Zionist Jews and their corrupt, buffoonish Goyim ass-lickers have done to America and the world, have stolen from America and the world, but I don't anymore. It was destiny that they would betray, just as it was destiny that Judas, the Pharisees, and the Judeans would betray -- it's the nature of the venomous snake to backbite or throat-strike at first available opportunity.

And what it will accomplish, in the end, is the unmasking of a corrupted, decrepit, decaying, crumbling Western civilization that needed to be purged of these fascist and communist parasites once and for all anyway before it could rise from the ashes to greater heights, glory and accomplishments than ever.

These essentially atheist-materialist imperialists, communists, zionists and fascists have been a drag on Christendom for hundreds of years, which is more than long enough.

It's long since time for the lot of them to go under the bus, one way or the other.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Why isn't the Zionist Jew belligerent who threatened Obama being paraded in handcuffs all over U.S. media the way a radical Muslim would be?

Jewish Terrorist Cell Found in The States

(YouTube.com) -- by proteanview --

Why don't Zionist Jews just move to Israel instead of sucking American blood through warmongering and funneling U.S. taxpayer money there?


(YouTube.com) -- by proteanview --

Israel has targeted U.S. presidents before, and killed many Americans; corrupt U.S. mainstream media dutifully covers it up

Israeli Assassinations and American Presidents

(Antiwar.com) -- by Alison Weir --

On Jan. 13 the Atlanta Jewish Times featured a column by its owner-publisher suggesting that Israel might someday need to “order a hit” on the president of the United States.

In the column, publisher Andrew Adler describes a scenario in which Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu would need to “give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel.”

The purpose? So that the vice president could then take office and dictate U.S. policies that would help the Jewish state “obliterate its enemies.”

Adler wrote that it is highly likely that the idea “has been discussed in Israel’s most inner circles.”

Numerous Jewish leaders quickly condemned Adler, who has now apologized for the column, resigned, and put the newspaper up for sale. An Israeli columnist noted that the hatred being stirred up against Obama is similar to conditions in Israel that led to the murder of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin by a Jewish extremist.

Many of those criticizing Adler claim that he defamed Israel by suggesting that it would ever do such a thing. Abe Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), proclaimed: “There is absolutely no excuse, no justification, no rationalization for this kind of rhetoric. It doesn’t even belong in fiction.”

In reality, however, Adler’s expectation that Israel’s inner circles have explored such a course of action, and would be willing to undertake it, may be entirely accurate. The fact is that Israel has killed and plotted to assassinate people throughout the world; a number have been Americans. One alleged plot was chillingly similar to Adler’s suggestion.

There is evidence that in 1991 an Israeli undercover team planned to assassinate a U.S. president. The intended victim was George Herbert Walker Bush...MORE...

All of this has been minimally reported in the U.S. press. While major news organizations from England to Israel to Australia covered the Jewish Times’ apparent endorsement of a possible Israeli assassination of a U.S. president, the scandal has been largely missing from U.S. media. Even Atlanta’s AP bureau inexplicably initially decided not to write a report on it, only finally sending out a story many days later.

Such news omissions concerning Israeli partisans are not rare. In 2004 a fanatic Israel loyalist wrote a letter saying that he was going to burn down Presbyterian churches while worshippers were inside (he was furious at the Presbyterian Church’s decision to divest from companies profiting from the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestinian land). This grisly threat also received minimal media play.

Despite Israeli violence against Americans (even while American taxpayers have given far more of our tax money to Israel than to any other nation) American presidential candidates, with the exception of Ron Paul, continue to vie over who is most devoted to Israel.

It is ironic that Adler considers Obama so bad for Israel, given that Israeli analysts have rated him second only to Mitt Romney in his fidelity to Israel. And Obama has now released a seven-minute video that may catapult our first African-American president into first place in pandering to an apartheid nation.

Perhaps he’ll be safe from assassins...MORE...LINK

Calculated, melodramatic hysteria never ends, as NY Times provides perpetual forum for Zionist emotional blackmail of U.S. into Israel-serving wars

‘NYT’ gives big platform to Israeli journalist to espouse Israeli attack on Iran with OK from Uncle Sam

(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

The New York Times Magazine runs a long piece by Ronen Bergman, an Israeli journalist, saying Israel will attack Iran soon because it must. The piece is pushy: it contains the hope/promise that the U.S. will give a "flickering green light" to this attack, as it did to Israel's attack on Egypt that set off the 1967 War.

Why on earth should the U.S. do such a thing?

Bergman's "Israeli perspective," as he describes it, turns out to be a fearful one, and lacking in all proportion-- and offered by a journalist who has reportedly called Iran the world's "number one terrorist power." When will cooler heads prevail? This piece is highly reminiscent of Jeffrey Goldberg's piece in the Atlantic in 2010, envisioning an inevitable strike, and rationalizing it on the basis of Netanyahu's fears of another Holocaust, and saying the U.S. must be on board. Bergman:
After speaking with many senior Israeli leaders and chiefs of the military and the intelligence, I have come to believe that Israel will indeed strike Iran in 2012. Perhaps in the small and ever-diminishing window that is left, the United States will choose to intervene after all, but here, from the Israeli perspective, there is not much hope for that. Instead there is that peculiar Israeli mixture of fear — rooted in the sense that Israel is dependent on the tacit support of other nations to survive — and tenacity, the fierce conviction, right or wrong, that only the Israelis can ultimately defend themselves. --

Chris Moore comments:

The reason the Israelis want the green light from the U.S. to attack Iran is so the Zionist can get the ball rolling, and then withdraw into their bunkers and let the U.S. soldiers do the fighting and dying.

That way, the fifth column of Israel lobby bought-off whores who occupy Congress and the White House can say: We didn't start the war, the Israelis did. But they're our #1 ally, so we have to come to their aid and do the fighting.

This is what happens when a country allows a fascist Diaspora nation of Jews to infiltrate, corrupt and co-opt it; this is what happens when a defective generation of Judeo-Christian Zionists and Judeophile liberal reprobates and Jesus-hating degenerates (yes, that includes the pseudo-Christian, warmongering evangelicals who screech in rage and boo in loud chorus at the public recitation of Jesus' Golden Rule) climbs into bed with demonic Zionist Jews.

Not only is the treasonous Diaspora nation of Israel-first Jewish Zionists a mortal menace to America, but so are its legions of Goyim whores, useful idiots, lackeys, and partners in fascist crime and theft, who are busy plundering the U.S. as well as the Mideast.

These P.I.G.S. (People Ingratiated to Satan) need to be torn from the seats of power, root and branch, and replaced with America-first patriots. And they know it.

No wonder they're busy constructing a totalitarian state -- to keep American patriots from getting at their throats.

These P.I.G.S. will cling to power until they're put on trial for treason, and finally cut deep as lawful punishment for treason, guillotine style.

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Indoctrinated into an ethno-religious ideology that advocates fascism and Jewish world control, Zionist Jews seek to subjugate ALL goyim

The Brainwashing of the Jews

(Intifada-Palestine.com) -- by Dr. Elias Akleh --

There are increasing indications, although slim but hopeful, that more Israeli Jews are awakening to the satanic realities of the Zionist Greater Israel Project in the heart of the Arab World. The Jews in general and Israeli Jews in particular, had been subjected for thousands of years to an extremist religiously fundamentalist brainwashing sinister scheme. Its goal is to implant in the Jewish collective psyche the satanic ideology of God’s chosen people in God’s promised land, and that it is their “mitzvah”, their religious duty, to terrorize and murder ALL GOYEMS, and to steal all their wealth and their land for the ultimate purpose of creating a Jewish only world with Jerusalem as the center of the world.

Shortly after its inception few thousand years ago Judaism, as a religion, had been grossly distorted and misinterpreted by extremist political rabbis who had morphed it into an aggressive colonial religious ideology with the goal of creating a Jewish-controlled world. Thus Jews (Israelites), rather than the human race, were designated as God’s chosen people, and Palestine (the land of Canaan) in the heart of the old world, rather than planet Earth, as God’s promised land. With a racist, vindictive, murdering god (check the Old Testament) this ideology permits the Jews to kill all non-Jews for the sake of creating a Jewish only state (Israel). This extremist political religious ideology is known at present as Zionism.

The Jews were brainwashed that since they are chosen by God they are envied and hated by the rest of the human races, who are out to persecute them and to kill them. They are taught that all non-Jews are inflicted with an intrinsically pathological disease called anti-Semitism meaning anti-Jewish as if Jews are the only Semitic nation. To protect themselves they are instructed to live under the leadership of their rabbis in their own Jewish only communities (ghettos) separated from the others. Although Jews are citizens of different countries and are members of different ethnicities they are told that they are persecuted in every country and that they had suffered multiple holocausts. They are urged to deny their original citizenships and to immigrate to Palestine, an alleged empty land, their promised land, to establish a Jewish-only state, where they could live safely and peacefully. Those misguided, who followed this calling, discovered that they had to become militarized and to commit genocidal crimes against the indigenous people; the Palestinians, and to steal the land in order to establish their Jewish state. Instead of this promised safety they discovered that they have to live in perpetual wars the rest of their lives.

Gilad Atzmon, an Israeli Jewish musician and writer, born in Israel but left to live in the UK, argued in one of his articles “The Complete Guide to Killing Non-Jews” that one has to understand the Jewish culture in the light of Judaic teachings in order to grasp the magnitude of the barbaric crimes the Jewish state had committed against humanity. “Zionism was rather effective in transforming the Old Testament from a spiritual text into a land registry” he stated.

Nurit Peled-Elhanan, a professor of language and education in the Hebrew University in Israel, had lost her young daughter in a suicide bombing. After some soul searching she had discovered that Israeli Jews as well as other Jews in the Western countries who received Jewish education “… were raised on false and racist values; actually on hetero-phobia”. She argues that anti-Semitism (anti-Jewish) is the result of the actions of the only government in the world (Israeli government) who deliberately sends young Jewish boys and girls to their certain death, and who persecute, to the point of genocide, another Semitic nation (the Palestinians). She explains that the reason Palestinian demonstrators carry signs equating the Star of David with the Nazi Swastika is due to the actions of the Israeli government and its army rather than a morbid hatred to the Jews.

Elhanan, similar to Atzmon, blames the false Judaic teachings for turning Jewish children into murdering monsters, killing, torturing and humiliating other non-Jewish children, their parents and their grandparents, and sacrificing their own lives for the megalomania of the Israeli chiefs. She stated in one of her lectures: “In the so-called Western enlightened world everyone feels very well founded when they blame Islam for suicide bombing and terror, but who would ever blame Judaism for murder? And yet ultraorthodox Jewish children who had never left Brooklyn know that to kill Arabs is a Mitzvah “holy commandment” for they are wild beasts, and Israeli children actually commit the crimes of slaughter and torture. However neither Judaism nor Islam or any religion for that matter is the cause for murder and terror. Racist education is, American imperialism is, an Israeli ruthless regime of occupation is.”

Lillian Rosengarten is a Jewish pacifist writer, who had sailed to Gaza along with six other Jews aboard a humanitarian boat, but was kidnapped by the Israeli navy to Ashdod. She was then deported and banned entry to Israel for 10 years. It seems that Israel welcomes only warmongering Jews and rejects humanitarian dissenting Jews like Rosengarten.

Rosengarten also criticized the hetero-phobic values instilled in the Jewish psyche due to the “blurring the distinction between Zionist nationalism and Jewish religion”. She states that Israelis in general do not know Palestinians. They are taught from early age that all Palestinians are terrorists, who hate Jews and want to drive them into the sea. She exposes the myth of Israel as the only peace loving democracy in the Middle East as a deception because “A Jewish state created through subjugation, occupation, collective punishment and humiliation of Palestinians is not a democracy.” She accuses the Zionist Israeli government of gross human rights abuses of Palestinians, actions that create anti Jewish sentiments. She emphasizes that “it is not difficult to understand how brutalization invites hate. We can only guess how the children of Gaza (and all Palestinians as well) who grow up amidst the endless violence, suffering, death and so much hopelessness, will grow up to despise the people (Jews) who are their enemy.” She predicts that the Zionist Israeli Project is doomed to failure due to “Israel’s contempt and intolerance for other religions and cultures, and the desire to be a Jewish state.”

To sustain the momentum of the Zionist Project to reach its sinister goal, it was necessary to feed it with new warmongering young blood to replace the old and the depleted, and what is a better way to do so than programming the Jewish collective conscious of the new generations since childhood when their minds are still gullible, pliable, and open to suggestions. If they believe in the tooth fairy they would believe in Zionism especially if it is reinforced in their mind within every step of their mental and psychological development.

In a previous article, “Israel’s Terrorist Educational System”, I explained how Israel has become a full fledge militarized society through the militarization of their educational system that glorifies military power and war as the only way of Israeli life. It paints military service as the ultimate religious service that their god requests them to perform. It reinforces the concept of might is right. The most prominent characteristic of the Israeli educational system is its militarized color, where military personnel are entrusted with the management of all the educational institutions and the teaching of students. Israel also has rabbi-run and managed religious military institutions, known as “Yishovot Hahsadir”, that combine religious and military extremism, where gullible young Jewish minds are constantly fed with racist Zionist religious indoctrination as well as military training. With an angry, jealous, vengeful and murdering Judaic god, who murders even groups of his chosen people as well as their enemies, Israeli young generations learn that murder is a divine act rather than the ultimate sin...MORE...LINK

Top: Jewish Zionist settlers are blatant in their fascist hatred of goyim (non-Jews); below: Diaspora Jewish Zionist bankers are far more suave and subtle, but equally fascist -- and even more dangerous

Chris Moore comments:

Readers will be interested in the comments by a G. Pratt from the original article that I have attached below.

Pratt basically says the Israelites (descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob) were but one faction of the Christian-era Judean nation, hence "the original Jews included Israelites, Samaritans and the descendents of the Philistines."

The Judean's were spiritually led by the Pharisees, who practiced a mish-mash religion (which Jesus condemned as a fraud) very different than that of the Israelites, and which is the same as the religion that the Jewish nation (Israeli and Diaspora “Jews” or supposed remnants of Judeans) practice today.

Hence, Pharisaic/Talmudic Judaism has been an interloping, thieving, opportunistic fraud from the beginning, one that apparently attracts interloping, thieving opportunist, hustlers, liars and frauds of all stripes today, just as it did during Jesus' era (as epitomized by the crowds of Judean rabble, incited by the Pharisees, who demanded Jesus’ crucifixion for telling the truth about Pharisaic frauds).

One characteristic I've noticed about the Talmudists/Pharisaics and their Goyim partners in crime of today is that they are incredibly greedy money worshippers (the ruthless, hard-core Capitalists, yes, but the racketeering, thieving Communists and crony socialists, too) and they are sociopaths.

Hence, Judeo-Christian Zionists and Judeophile liberals in the West, just like their Pharisaic masters, will stoop to any level, no matter how sleazy or murderous, to get their grubby fingers on the filthy lucre. And it shows today, as the lying, warmongering Zionists, and banksters, and their partners in crime, have adopted naked fascism to steal from the Mideast, and to steal from average Americans, and to steal from average Europeans, all as a precursor to stealing and enslaving the world.
Gordon "Gord" Pratt Reply 24. Jan, 2012 at 8:40 pm
Contrary to what the author says Jews and Israelites are not the same thing.

‘Israelite’ refers to the decendents of the biblical Patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. God renamed the last Israel.

‘Jew’ originally referred to Judeans, citizens of the Roman kingdom of Judea, which ruled the holy land for a couple of centuries around the time of Christ’s ministry on earth.

The original Jews included Israelites, Samaritans and the descendents of the Philistines.

So ‘Jew’ originally marked a nationality not a religious group.

Fast forward a millenium and a half. A religion which began in Palestine as ‘Phariseeism’ and rebranded several times, settles on ‘Judaism’ for a name. Followers of this religion call themselves ‘Jews’, short for Judaist.

But Pharisees were only ever a fringe group among the Israelites, and Phariseeism grew by converting non-Jews (people outside Palestine). So there is no way today’s Jews (Judaists) can be equated with the ancient Israelites.
Gordon "Gord" Pratt Reply:
January 25th, 2012 at 11:23 am

No, I do not seek to minimize the fact of colonialism.

But it is important to recognize the most insidious form of brainwashing is in the language.

The zionists promote the Israelite=Jew falsehood because it implies some historical justification, however small, for their theft of Palestine.

Use the zionist language and one has gone some distance to admitting the zionist claim on the land.

In the US there are 30,000,000 self-described “Christian evangelicals” who absolutely believe the modern Jews are descendents of the Israelites. These Americans would be shocked to learn the only connection of the people they support to the Israelites is through Phariseeism, which Jesus roundly condemned.
UPDATE: One other point. Just as the money-grubbing, Anglo-fascist Imperialists were early partners of the Rothschilds (all of whom the American Founders ass-kicked off of the continent) so are money-grubbing, neo-fascist and neo-Imperialists partners of the Zionist Jew, international bankers today.

They all need another ass-kicking off of the continent.--C.M.

Monday, January 23, 2012

Why is IDF "stunned" to find officers less committed to Jewish Zionist (aka neo-fascist) values after visits to Nazi death camps?

Study: IDF officers less committed to Jewish values after visits to Nazi death camps

Some 3,000 career officers a year make the trip, which is preceded by a mandatory seminar at Yad Vashem or the Ghetto Fighters' House Museum.
(Haaretz) -- by Chaim Levinson --

The Israel Defense Forces has been "stunned" by the findings of a new study which says an officers' visitation program to Nazi death camps, meant to reinforce Jewish and national values, has had the opposite effect on up to 20 percent of the soldiers.

The program, called Witnesses in Uniform, was founded in the 1990s and involves IDF officers visiting death camps in Poland. It was greatly expanded in the mid-2000s, under former Chief of Staff (and current Vice Prime Minister ) Moshe Ya'alon. Today, some 3,000 career officers a year make the trip, which is preceded by a mandatory seminar at either the Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem or the Ghetto Fighters' House Museum in the Western Galilee. Altogether, some 25,000 officers have participated in the program over the last decade.

With the army's consent, researchers from the Ariel University Center spent the last 18 months doing in-depth interviews with 600 participants to examine the trip's influence on them. Army sources said they were "stunned" by the findings, which seem to indicate that the trips are achieving the opposite of their declared purpose.

The study found that before going on the trip, officers expressed a very high level of commitment to the Jewish people and to preserving their Jewish heritage, and high levels of solidarity with the fate of other Jews.

In contrast, they expressed a lower - though still high - level of commitment to more universalist ideas, such as understanding the universal context of the Holocaust.

After they returned from the trips, however, the researchers found a drop in commitment to all values related to Jewish identity, including the importance of the Land of Israel for the Jewish people, the importance of the IDF's existence, feelings of national pride in being Israeli, and a sense of a shared Jewish fate.

The study found a particularly dramatic decline in the importance the officers attached to Jewish and Israeli symbols, and to Diaspora Jewry.

The trips also produced a decline in IDF-related values, including commitment to the state and the army, feelings of leadership, and love of heroism.

In contrast, the trips produced no change in the officers' commitment to universal democratic values such as human dignity, the sanctity of life and tolerance...MORE...LINK

Gingrich openly admits that the Jewish-American Zionist oligarch who just bought him victory in S. Carolina has a primary loyalty to Israel

Gingrich Major Backer Is Arch-Zionist Sheldon Adelson

(Rense.com) -- by Stephen Sniegoski --

Gingrich’s faltering presidential campaign was completely resuscitated by a 5 million donation from Las Vegas casino king and super-Zionist Sheldon Adelson. (According to Wikipedia, Adelson is currently the 8th wealthiest American and 16th wealthiest person in the world, with a net worth of $23.3 billion.) Rising from the ashes, Gingrich now has won the South Carolina primary and has a decent chance of becoming the Republican presidential nominee.

Adelson has been the major backer of Gingrich for some time. A Washington Post article on the Adelson-Gingrich connection (though kept out of the first section of the paper) states: “Perhaps no other major presidential candidate in recent times has had his fortunes based so squarely on the contributions of a single donor, as Gingrich has on Adelson, who has spent millions in support of Gingrich and his causes over the past five years.”



As the Washington Post article points out, Adelson and his Israeli-born wife, Miriam, have spent time and money lobbying for a bill to move the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Gingrich has promised that his first executive order as president would be the embassy move.

Adelson is an ardent Zionist. Since 2007 the Adelson Family Foundation has made contributions totaling $100 million to Birthright Israel, which finances Jewish youth trips to Israel, Adelson is such a hard-line Zionist that he even stopped supporting AIPAC when it appeared to support a 2007 peace initiative championed by Olmert, President Bush, and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.



In 2009, the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), which is a hard-line Zionist group that wants Israel to retain the occupied territories and expand the Jewish settlements, presented Adelson its most distinguished and historic award, the Theodor Herzl Gold Medallion for outstanding achievement in Zionism. His wife received the Louis D. Brandeis Award. The couple now have their names on one of ZOA’s major awards, the Dr. Miriam & Sheldon Adelson Defender of Israel Award.

Adelson is intimately involved in Israeli politics. Since 2007, Adelson has owned a daily newspaper in Israel called Israel Hayom, which distributed free of charge, has the largest circulation of any newspaper in the country. The newspaper is ultra-supportive of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, to whom Adelson is a close ideological ally and personal friend. The newspaper also has been doing much to promote Gingrich.



It should be recalled that Gingrich was so extreme as to recently say that the Palestinians are an “invented people.” Shortly thereafter, Adelson said that Gingrich had been completely correct. In an address at a Hanukkah celebration in Israel for hundreds of youths visiting that country as part of the Taglit Birthright (Birthright Israel) program (which Adelson funds), Adelson stated: “Read the history of those who call themselves Palestinians, and you will hear why [Newt] Gingrich said recently that the Palestinians are an invented people. There are a number of Palestinians who will recognize the truth of this statement.” He appealed to the Jewish youths to “speak in support of Israel” when they returned to their countries.



When on the NBC show Rock Center, Ted Koppel asked Gingrich about the reason for Adelson’s support, Gingrich was quite frank: “He knows I'm very pro Israel. That's the central value of his life. I mean, he's very worried that Israel is going to not survive.”



If Israel is the “central value” of Adelson’s life (which certainly appears to be true), he is one Jewish American who cannot be accused of having a “dual loyalty.” His loyalty is truly singular!

Like most American conservatives, Gingrich purports to identify with the wisdom of the Founding Fathers, but catering to a person with a view such as Adelson’s puts Gingrich in a position completely opposite to that of George Washington, who, in his Farewell Address of 1796, warned Americans of the grave danger of those who had a “passionate attachment” to a foreign country.

While the mainstream media has focused on the negative effects of big money super pacs, and shows no particular fondness for Gingrich, it makes little reference to his major patron’s identification with Israel. In fact, Rachel Maddow and Michael Isikoff even managed to offer a critical presentation of Adelson’s financing of Gingrich without any reference to Israel...MORE...LINK

George Washington warned us about low-cunning knaves with a “passionate attachment” to foreign countries. Israel-Firster Sheldon Adelson and his puppet Newt Gingrich: the antithesis of the values of America's Founders

Chris Moore comments:

From the article:

When on the NBC show Rock Center, Ted Koppel asked Gingrich about the reason for Adelson’s support, Gingrich was quite frank: “He knows I'm very pro Israel. That's the central value of his life. I mean, he's very worried that Israel is going to not survive.”
The "survival of Israel" or the "survival of the Jewish" people; that's always the excuse that these Zionists and their lackeys use for their fascism, and it goes from left to right.

For example, crypto-Zionist Jewish communists made anti-Semitism a crime in the early Soviet sphere and used it as a pretext to murder millions of Christians (just as they seek to use it as a pretext to murder millions of Muslims in the Mideast today) to ensure "the survival of the Jews."

The Zionists are running a murderous, thieving, fascist racket, and far too much of organized Jewry is in full partnership. Why are "the Jews" an "endangered species" under perpetual duress from all quarters, century after century? Because their Zionist leadership is fascist, and leads them down the greedy road to theft and murder at every opportunity.

Those decent Jews truly interested in the survival of Godly (as opposed to worldly, Talmudic) Judaism will wipe out the fascist Zionist leadership and all of its lackeys from left to right, pronto. Otherwise, they'll end up taking the fall for the fascist Commie/Zionist leadership just as they did in Germany. And the Zionist Jews will laugh and point fingers from Israel, and call them stupid for refusing to join the fascist Zionist racket, and say they deserved their fate, just like the Zionists elites today say the American people deserve their national bankruptcy for overspending on economic Ponzi schemes that these Zionists themselves engineered, and for allowing Zionists to take over their country.

In some ways, they're right -- which is why the survival of America, Western civilization, and Jesus-Christianity (as opposed to counterfeit-Christian, satanic Judeo-Christian Zionism) and common ethics, morality and decency requires a national policy of zero-tolerance for Zionists and their useful idiots.

Prod these fascist swine and their goy lackeys to Israel, where they can worship the Zionist pharisees and engage in their orgies of murder and satanism upon one another, instead of preying upon decent, law-abiding folk "shackled" by their common ethics, humanism, morality and Christian and Western sense of decency.

Saturday, January 21, 2012

Strange wording of Atlanta Jewish Times' call for Mossad to consider assassinating Obama has people wondering about Israeli connection to JFK hit

(By Chris Moore) -- The strange wording of the Atlanta Jewish Times' call for Israel's Mossad to consider assassinating President Barack Obama "in order to preserve Israel’s existence" has people talking about the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy, and again pondering whether Israel was behind that assassination, as well. (For a quick rundown of some of those theories, HERE'S a Google search).

First, Alan Hart nicely summarizes the current controversy here:

Have Israel’s “Inner Circles” Discussed Assassinating President Obama?

(Alanhart.net) -- by Alan Hart --

One man who apparently thinks the answer is “Yes” is Andrew Adler, the owner and publisher of the Atlanta Jewish Times...

In his weekly newspaper Adler listed three options for Israel “to counter Iran’s nuclear weapons”. (Never mind that, unlike Israel, Iran does not possess nuclear weapons and that the latest assessment of Israel’s intelligence community – an usually honest assessment – is that Iran has not yet taken a decision to go nuclear for weapons).

Option 1 according to what Adler wrote “is to launch a pre-emptive strike against Hamas and Hezbollah.”

Option 2 “is to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities.”

Option 3 “is to give the go-ahead for US-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place and forcefully dictate that the United States’ policy includes its helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies.”

To make sure his readers got the message, Adler added this:

“Yes, you read ‘three correctly’. Order a hit on a president in order to preserve Israel’s existence. Think about it. If you have thought of this Tom-Clancy-type scenario, don’t you think that this almost unfathomable idea has been discussed in Israel’s most inner circles?”...MORE...LINK
Now, connecting the dots between Adler's musings about a possible Mossad assassination of Obama and its relationship to Israeli interests, and the actual assassination of JFK and its relationship to Israeli interests, are a couple of commenters at Mondoweiss, a popular blog that concentrates on Israel and Zionist-related news and issues, who note the strange mention by Adler of an assassinated president being succeed by a vice president who is devoutly pro-Israel. (Vice President Joe Biden is on record as declaring himself a devout Zionist).
Mikesailor says:
January 20, 2012 at 10:58 pm

Perhaps the publisher read Victor Ostrovsky’s book : ‘By Way Of Deception’. In it, Ostrovsky describes how, during his Mossad training, his instructors held the Kennedy assassination as a prime example of a political murder performed correctly. Although never admitting the Mossad was behind the ‘hit’, one must wonder at the coincidences. After Kennedy told the Israelis that Dimona should be declared and Israel should join the NPT, he was assassinated and the much more ‘pliable’ Lyndon Johnson inaugurated. How ‘pliable’ was Johnson? He scotched all mention of Dimona and the NPT, and even when the Israelis attacked the Liberty, he attempted a ham-handed cover-up which remains to this day as the ‘official’ explanation. Where do you think the US policy toward Israeli nuclear weapons i.e. ‘ambiguity’ arose; with such policy remaining to this day? And investigation of the role of the Zionist gun-runner, Jack Ruby, is anathema to the main-stream media. Interesting, isn’t it?

Jeffrey Blankfort says:
January 21, 2012 at 1:08 pm

You beat me to it, Mikesailor. When I reread these lines:

“Three, give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place, and forcefully dictate that the United States’ policy includes its helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies,”

it occurred to me that this may have been the thinking behind the JFK assassination, not only because of Kennedy’s steadfast opposition to Israel obtaining nuclear weapons but because he supported Res. 194, the Palestinian right of return, and through brother RFK at the Justice Dept., was seriously attempting to get the American Zionist Council, AIPAC’s name at birth, to register as a foreign agent which the AZC’s lawyers were able to stymie until JFK was out of the way. Had the AZC/AIPAC been forced to register as a foreign agent–which it was then and remains as much so today–it not would have been able to function as it does today in the nation’s capitol and in the halls of Congress.

These were three red lines that Israel could not allow to be crossed and it is worth noting that no president since has attempted to cross even one of them. Cui bono? You got it.

MW readers should check out Grant Smith’s Foreign Agents: “The American Israel Public Affairs Committee from the 1963 Fulbright Hearings to the 2005 Espionage Scandal” available at IRmep, WRMEA, or online. Two years ago, Smith presented 360 pages of evidence at a two-hour meeting with the Justice Dept.’s Foreign Agents Registration unit, requesting that it re-open the case to get AZC-now-AIPAC to register begun by RFK in 1963 but in Israeli Occupied Washington, even though members of the unit seemed sympathetic, it didn’t stand a chance. The paper trail, however, hasn’t gone away. See Smith’s Israel Lobby Archive at irmep.org/ila/
In the cases of both JFK and Obama, one reason a Mossad assassination is theoretically possible and even likely is the Zionist psychology revealed behind Adler's statement that assassinating Obama might be necessary to "preserve Israel's existence."

Even though Israel is armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons, and has one of the 10 most powerful military forces in the world, and as Alan Hart mentioned above, Iran has no nuclear weapons of its own whatsoever, the way the leadership of Zionism helps facilitate the continual expansionism of Israel itself, and Diaspora Zionist power as well, is to convince itself, its Jewish Zionist agents and allies in the Diaspora, and potential sympathizers in the West and elsewhere, that Israel is a literal and metaphorical stand-in for "the Jewish people," and is under perpetual existential threat, and constantly facing another Holocaust. Hence any and all actions are justified in order to "save the Jews."

It's a massive lie of course, and one used by Zionists throughout history to justify their mass murder (for example, saving the Jews from anti-Semitism and extermination was one of the rationales used by Communist Jews as a pretext to exterminate millions of "anti-Semitic" Christians in the early Soviet sphere many years before the Holocaust), but it is a highly effective (if incredibly cynical) means to rally the troops, justify all manner of atrocities, and incite Diaspora Zionists to engage in high treason time and again -- all in order to manipulatively serve the fascist interests of the insatiably greedy, expansionist, ambitious and totalitarian Judeofascists patriarchs at the core of the Zionist nation of Israel, and at the core of the various virtual nations in the Diaspora.

And it's also helpful in roping in Gentile useful idiots, opportunistic collaborators, and gullible bleeding hearts to betray their own interests and nations in order to "save the Jews."

The problem is, this fascist, murderous, Zionist scam is wearing thin, and like the boy who cried wolf, fewer and fewer intelligent people come running, because in the end, serving "the Jews" amounts to actually serving the Judeofascists who seek to exploit, subvert, manipulate and subjugate anyone who isn't Jewish, and even a lot of people who are.

Friday, January 20, 2012

My answer to those who claim anti-Zionists seek to finish the work started by the Holocaust

(By Chris Moore) -- There likely would have been no Holocaust (as overblown and exploited by Zionist fascists and their collaborators as it is) if not for Jewish fascists masquerading as Communists carrying out genocide in Russia.

Karl Marx’s Jewish Zionist guru, Moses Hess, hatched a vision to exterminate the German people in the 1800’s, and the Jewish Bolsheviks got the ball rolling in early Soviet Russia by exterminating the Russian nobility and elite (many of whom were of European/German background) along with millions of average Christians and peasants, which made many Germans view Jewry in its entirety as an existential threat (whereas they should have simply targeted for deportation the Zionist/fascist Jews, many of whom were also masquerading as Communists in Germany.)

Fascist Jewry used communism as a Trojan horse for Jewish supremacism, just as it has used (pseudo) “liberalism” (of the militant, statist-authoritarian, neoliberal variety) and, just as transparently, neoconservatism, as ideological Trojan horses for Jewish supremacism in the United States.

Of course, it hasn’t worked alone; thugs, con artists, gangsters and other low-cunning, racket-running gutter snipes have always been attracted to/allied with Zionist Jewry and its fascist racket wherever it goes, and it matters not whether they’re of the left-wing or the right-wing variety.

Thus, it is the amoral gangsters and soulless money-worshippers who don’t want to confine fascist Jewry to the Levant (Communists, “liberal” totalitarians, neolibs, neocons, Judeo-Christian Zionists) in order that they may conspire with it in theft, mass murder and other evil enterprises (under the auspices of “government” and "nationals defense") who are far more likely to facilitate a new Holocaust than those who criticize Zionism (both Diaspora and Levant) as the fascist racket it is.

The only way to “save” fascist Jewry is to save it from itself, and from its thug partners in crime who encourage and profit from its fascism, and will see that it takes the fall instead of them when history finally demands accountability.

Why do Diaspora Zionists and their lackeys despise the characterization "Israel-Firster" so much? Because it's so accurate

Israel Firster’ gets at an inconvenient truth

(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

The new battleground in the argument over Israel's influence on American policy is the idea that some of those pushing an attack on Iran are "Israel Firsters."

The term has been used by MJ Rosenberg of Media Matters and Zaid Jilani, formerly of Center for American Progress. Israel supporters have struck back hard. They claim that using the term is anti-Semitic because it calls on a long history of questioning Jews' loyalty to western countries.

Yesterday Jeremy Ben-Ami of J Street bravely defended the use of the expression in an interview with the Washington Post. "If the charge is that you're putting the interests of another country before the interests of the United States in the way you would advocate that, it's a legitimate question," Ben-Ami said. (And today Ben-Ami, evidently summoned by commisar Jeffrey Goldberg, apologizes for misspeaking.)

I think "Israel firster" is a perfectly legitimate term in a wide-open American discourse-- especially a debate about attacking another country. Obviously, it's loaded. It's a comment on a person's motivation, and it can be wielded as a form of redbaiting. But as an intellectual and political question, it has a long and honorable pedigree.

Its legitimacy can be demonstrated by three factual arguments:

1, Israel supporters routinely make frank professions of loyalty that raise the issue. 2, Students of US policy, including many mainstream (and Jewish) writers, have blurted frank comments in recent years about dual loyalty, so it must be a useful term. 3, It was useful historically for three important theorists of Zionism, Theodor Herzl, Hannah Arendt, and Rabbi Elmer Berger. If they get to talk about it, why can't we?

1). Public declarations of loyalty.

Senator Chuck Schumer went to AIPAC and declared that his name means guardian in Hebrew and then he cried, "Am Yisroel Chai." The people of Israel live! MJ Rosenberg caught this:
Schumer: "I believe Hashem [Orthodox for God] actually gave me that name. One of my roles, very important in the United States senate, is to be a shomer -- to be a or the shomer Yisrael. And I will continue to be that with every bone in my body ..."
He's hardly alone. Neoconservative Elliott Abrams wrote in a book on Jewish identity that “Outside the land of Israel, there can be no doubt that Jews, faithful to the covenant between God and Abraham, are to stand apart from the nation in which they live.” Alan Dershowitz has written that American Jews have a "sacred mission" to protect Jewish lives in Israel, and The Forward has lately stated that Jewish university presidents have "loyalty" to Israel...MORE...LINK

Mask continues to slip, fast-revealing fascist essence of Zionist Jewry: Atlanta Jewish Times editor mulls benefits of Mossad assassination of Obama

Newspaper Editor: Israel Should Consider Assassinating Obama

(Gawker) -- by John Cook --

Andrew Adler, the owner and publisher of the Atlanta Jewish Times, a weekly newspaper serving Atlanta's Jewish community, devoted his January 13, 2012 column to the thorny problem of the U.S. and Israel's diverging views on the threat posed by Iran. Basically Israel has three options, he wrote: Strike Hezbollah and Hamas, strike Iran, or "order a hit" on Barack Obama. Either way, problem solved!
Here's how Adler laid out "option three" in his list of scenarios facing Israeli president Benjamin Netanyahu (the column, which was forwarded to us by a tipster, isn't online, but you can read a copy here):
Three, give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place, and forcefully dictate that the United States' policy includes its helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies.

Yes, you read "three" correctly. Order a hit on a president in order to preserve Israel's existence. Think about it. If I have thought of this Tom Clancy-type scenario, don't you think that this almost unfathomable idea has been discussed in Israel's most inner circles?

Another way of putting "three" in perspective goes something like this: How far would you go to save a nation comprised of seven million lives...Jews, Christians and Arabs alike?

You have got to believe, like I do, that all options are on the table.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Nutty Netanyahu switches Greatest Threats to Israel column from Islamists to Western-oriented critics

‘NYT’ and ‘Haaretz’ and world opinion are now greatest threat to Israel, Netanyahu reportedly said

(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

This is interesting. A year or so back, Netanyahu said that Israel's greatest threats were Hamas and Iran and Richard Goldstone. Now he has apparently revised that assessment and said that Israel's greatest enemies are Haaretz and the New York Times, per this account.

I have to believe that Netanyahu is serious and this is his logical conclusion-- which is why his office rushed to deny the account today. But the original assessment squares with Ali Abunimah's belief that the walls of international opinion are closing in on Israel. The Netanyahu assessment is proof that the truth is what will set Palestine free-- knowledge of the occupation and conflict, overcoming the hasbara. We complain all the time about the New York Times here, but even it is reflecting more critical views of Israel...MORE...LINK

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Are even Jews getting fed up with Jewry? Jewish man arrested for making anti-Semitic calls to his mother, also suspected of painting swastikas

Police: Man Made Anti-Semitic Calls to Mom

Suspect May Also Be Behind Swastika Graffiti, Report Says
(Forward) -- by Staff --

The common refrain “call your mother, she worries” doesn’t refer to the kinds of calls that one Manhattan man is suspected of making.

David Haddad, who was arrested January 16, is alleged to have made anti-Semitic calls to three elderly women, including his 80-year-old mother. “All Jews should die and go to hell,” he reportedly said to his mother, a Sheepshead Bay, Brooklyn resident, when she answered the phone on one occasion last month, The New York Post reports.

According to the Post, police also suspect Haddad, who was raised Jewish, may be responsible for spray-painting swastikas — one accompanied by the words “Die Jews” — in the heavily Orthodox neighborhood of Midwood, Brooklyn on January 14. He has not been charged in connection to the anti-Semitic graffiti...MORE...LINK

Chris Moore comments:

There is a semi-comical element to this story, but a serious side, as well. It raises an interesting question about the potential for Jewish anti-Semitism.

At what point does the sinister side of organized Jewish behaviour become so arrogant, sick and loathsome (I'm not just talking about Zionism here, but things like this chronic cover up of sexual abuse in the Jewish community that is now coming to light, as well), that we are likely to see a large scale outbreak of anti-Semitism in the Jewish community?

I think its an interesting sociological question, particularly with the new relevance and wide influence of the Internet, which turns over rocks and shatters long-buried history and long-taboo subjects of discussion, now making them available to all manner of people under formerly tight-knit control, and exposing them to other perspectives on their own cultures that they heretofore haven't been allowed to see or hear.

I wonder how much pent-up rage at organized Jewry is out there among average Jews? Just based on some of my own observations on what I would characterize as its fanaticism, there's got to be tremendous emotional resentments towards their own taxing, guilt-tripping, often perversely obsessive and vindictive "culture of control" among plenty of Jews themselves.

The Internet may well release an avalanche of Jewish "pay back" against organized Jewry itself. What is it the Zionists call this? "Price tag" attacks? The fellow mentioned in this story may well be assigning a "price tag" to his own Jewish community for its own despicable conduct.

I wouldn't write this incident off too quickly as a case of mental illness. The man may well be far more rational than the majority of his fellow Jews.

'West Wing' sketch of how Zionists impose their delusional will over spineless liberals as epitomized by "President" Josiah Bartlet (Martin Sheen)

Map of Holy Land -

(YouTube.com) -- by 1709 syedshoeb --

Bush administration was reportedly furious with Israel's cavalier abuse of special relationship; doubts about its value as "strategic asset"

Report: Israeli Spies Posed as CIA to Recruit Anti-Iran Terrorists
(The New American) -- by Alex Newman --

An explosive report published late last week by the magazine Foreign Policy, citing half-a-dozen current and former U.S. intelligence officers, claimed that spies with Israel’s Mossad agency were posing as Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) agents to recruit terrorists for a covert war against Iran. An Israeli official, however, dismissed the allegations as “nonsense.”

According to the sources cited in the article, Israeli intelligence operatives were using American passports and wads of U.S. dollars to pose as CIA officers. The deception was reportedly used to recruit members of the notorious Pakistani terror group Jundallah, an organization on the U.S. State Department’s list of foreign terrorist organizations known for assassinations and brutal killings of women and children.

The Israeli operations were taking place in major cities such as London — almost out in the open — according to the report. They were aimed at enlisting the support of violent extremists to help disrupt the Iranian regime’s nuclear program, which many U.S. and Israeli officials have alleged is actually a cover to build atomic weapons.

Bush administration officials were reportedly furious after learning of the “false-flag” scheme, according to the report. One currently serving U.S. intelligence officer cited in the piece claimed that then-President George W. Bush "went absolutely ballistic" after being briefed on secret memos detailing the alleged Mossad operations.

The same source said White House officials were concerned that the Israeli program was putting Americans at risk. It also had the potential to further disrupt the U.S. government’s tenuous relationship with the regime ruling Pakistan, which recently cut all NATO supply routes to occupation troops in Afghanistan following an unrelated incident.

Finally, Foreign Policy reported, the alleged Israeli scheme undermined official U.S. government claims that it does not wage the terror war using terrorism. And it could have sparked retaliatory acts of violence on American personnel.

"This was stupid and dangerous," the U.S. intelligence agent who first blew the whistle on the Israeli operations told Foreign Policy. "Israel is supposed to be working with us, not against us. If they want to shed blood, it would help a lot if it was their blood and not ours. You know, they're supposed to be a strategic asset. Well, guess what? There are a lot of people now, important people, who just don't think that's true."...MORE...LINK

Zionist nation within: Certain Israel-first, US Jewish Zionist college presidents and alumni censor campus debate to shield Israel from accountability

College Leaders Balance Israel and Speech

Jewish Presidents Often Find They Must Leave Loyalty Behind
(Forward) -- by Naomi Zeveloff --

As the debate about Israel rages on college campuses across America, there is one figure for whom the conversation takes on strikingly personal dimensions: the Jewish college president.

About 20 Jewish men and women hold the highest positions at universities across the country, including campuses that have become hotbeds of political activism on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. For these individuals, the role of president entails a constant balancing act between encouraging free speech on campus and honoring their personal, often supportive, views of Israel.

In a series of interviews with the Forward, 10 current and former Jewish college presidents held forth on what the University of California’s Mark Yudof described as the “schizophrenia” of the Jewish college president — the moments when one’s Jewish identity bumps up against the interests of the institution. For many college presidents, the movement to boycott, divest from and implement sanctions against Israel — commonly known as BDS — represented a red line: Presidents who were previously disinclined to speak out against anti-Israel activity on campus in the name of preserving open dialogue found themselves publicly opposing the movement.

But going public on Israel had its limits. Several presidents voiced exasperation with the Jewish community’s scrutiny of campus events, preferring to mediate the Israel-Palestine debate internally. Still others described their efforts to extinguish sparks before they flared into small fires, by coaching Jewish and Muslim students in civil dialogue.

Yudof, who has run the 10-college U.C. system since 2008, is one president for whom the topic of BDS merited not only public condemnation, but also action. A self-described “strong defender of Israel” who oversees some of the most combustive campuses in America, Yudof has been alternately portrayed as a First Amendment wonk out of step with Jewish interests and an unblinking Zionist beholden to them.

In 2010, when U.C. Berkeley and U.C. San Diego students introduced bills in their student governments calling for divestment from General Electric Co. and United Technologies — two companies that manufacture Israeli military gear — Yudof felt compelled to take a decisive step. That May, he issued a statement saying that the Board of Regents would not consider BDS, since it was the board’s policy to take up divestment only if America’s government said that the regime in question was committing genocide. But for Yudof, there was a secondary reason.

“I thought there was a double standard with Israel,” he said. “It was unimaginable. Other countries were given a pass, and they were going to enforce this boycott against a tiny country in the Middle East. In my judgment, but for it being the Jewish state, it would not be on their list for a boycott.”...

Fogel wasn’t the only president to describe pressure from alumni and community members to quash perceived anti-Israel activity on campus. But not every Jewish college president welcomed such community input. Some presidents said that outsiders looking in held distorted views of the Israel discussion on campus, often seeing fires where there weren’t any...

At Rice University, in Houston, President David Leebron echoed this viewpoint, saying that the Israeli-Palestinian debate on campus is the subject of outsized, critical attention in the community, particularly in the local Jewish newspaper, which often prints negative articles about biased events at Rice. For instance, the local community made a fuss about the presence of Hanan Ashrawi, a Palestinian legislator, on Rice’s campus. But soon after, Rice hosted Israeli ambassador Michael Oren, a favorite target of pro-Palestinian groups.

“Sometimes what happens is that off-campus people who are very issue oriented take that one event out of context and try to draw conclusions about the institution, and that is just not the way you can judge an academic institution,” Leebron said. “The idea that every time there is a speaker you don’t like you should register outrage is foreign to the concept of an academic institution. This is where a lot of the tension comes from.”

Perhaps the starkest example of outside groups involving themselves in campus life is in the use of federal civil rights law to protect Jewish students from anti-Israel and anti-Semitic activity. In 2010, more than a dozen major Jewish organizations banded together to lobby the Department of Education to expand its definition of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act to cover Jewish students, among other groups. Since then, there have been a handful of complaints filed with the Office for Civil Rights. Many of them originated with outside Jewish organizations...MORE...LINK

Characterizing its 2008/09 Gaza massacre of women and children "a great success," calculating Zionist sociopaths plan a follow up for fun

Israeli Military Prepares for Massive Gaza Invasion ‘Within Months’

Military Eyes 'Similar Model' to 2008 Invasion
(Antiwar.com) -- by Jason Ditz --

The Jerusalem Post reports today that Israel’s military has ordered its Southern Command to prepare for a “large scale” invasion of the Gaza Strip, likely to begin within the next few months.

The revelation is hardly a surprise, as Israeli Military Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz has repeatedly pressed for an invasion of the Gaza Strip over the past few months, while trumpeting the late 2008 invasion as a “great success.”

Officials today indicated that the next invasion would be very much on the same model as 2008, which saw massive Palestinian civilian casualties and destruction of considerable civilian infrastructure, much of which remains unrepaired as an Israeli blockade has prevented construction materials from being imported.

Israeli officials cited “increased weaponry” in the Gaza Strip as the reason for the upcoming invasion, particularly anti-tank weapons. Other than getting some of their tanks blown up, it isn’t clear why they consider this a good reason to invade, as weapons have been flooding much of the region since the Libyan regime fell and their weapons warehouses were looted.

The exact timing of the invasion will also be tricky, as Israel will of course rely on the US to run interference in the UN when the ugliest aspects of the war begin to trickle out. The last invasion came after the 2008 US Presidential election but was virtually wrapped up before President Obama took office. It may be that Israel will try a similar strategy of starting the war after the vote in an effort to keep it from being a political issue in the US...LINK

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

More Zionist psyops from Jewish Hollywood: "Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close"...to Zionist propaganda

"One Stop Shopping, From Holocaust™ Fairly Tales to 9/11 LIES"

(Goon Squad) -- by Greg Bacon --

Unless you've been in a coma lately, you'll notice that Hollywood is promoting Big Time a movie about 9/11 and the succeeding events as seen thru the eyes of a nine-year-old boy named Oskar Schell, whose father died during the FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB of 9/11.

(Metaphor Alert! Abbreviate Oskar Schell's name and it comes out as O.S. which also happens to be the abbreviation for Oskar (They both have the same first names) Schindler, a German businessman who saved the lives of more than a thousand mostly Polish-Jewish refugees during WWII by employing them in his factories, another Holocaust™ tear jerker made into the 1993 movie, Schindler's List, which 'won' SEVEN Oscars.)

This psyops that is due to be splattered on movie screens nation-wide soon, is called "Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close," based on the book of the same name by Jonathan Safran Foer.

Here's some of the reviews of the book:
Critical response towards Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close has been generally less positive than for Foer's first novel, Everything Is Illuminated; John Updike, writing for The New Yorker, found the second novel to be "thinner, overextended, and sentimentally watery", stating that "the book's hyperactive visual surface covers up a certain hollow monotony in its verbal drama". In a New York Times review Michiko Kakutani said, "While it contains moments of shattering emotion and stunning virtuosity that attest to Mr. Foer's myriad gifts as a writer, the novel as a whole feels simultaneously contrived and improvisatory, schematic and haphazard." Kakutani also stated the book was "cloying" and identified the unsympathetic main character as a major issue. Harry Siegel, writing in New York Press, bluntly titled his review of the book "Extremely Cloying & Incredibly False: Why the author of Everything Is Illuminated is a fraud and a hack", seeing Foer as an opportunist taking advantage of 9/11 "to make things important, to get paid" while also adding "The writers who make it get treated as symbols." Foer is supposed to be our new Philip Roth, though his fortune-cookie syllogisms and pointless illustrations and typographical tricks don't at all match up to or much resemble Roth even at his most inane. But Jews will be Jews, apparently."
Sounds enticing, doesn't it? Makes you want to reserve movie tickets in advance to see more brainwashing about the 9/11 tragedy to reinforce the official US government lies that 9/11 was pulled off by fanatical Arab jihadists who attacked us because we had too many freedoms.

It's directed by Stephen Daldry, who also directed the Holocaust™ yarn called "The Reader," (which polluted movie screens world-wide in 2008) starring Kate Winslet, who is one smart lady, since she knows starring in a Holocaust™ movie is the a sure-fire way to get that Oscar, which she did receive...MORE...LINK
As if Spielberg/Hanks' Saving Private Ryan wasn't war-glorifying enough, Jewish Hollywood boot licker Tom Hanks continues to whore himself out to Zionists

Rich Diaspora Judeofascists like billionaire gambling pimp Sheldon Adelson are even more dangerously Israel-first than a lot of Levantine Zionists

The Kingmaker

(The New Yorker) -- by Connie Bruck --

Several years ago, Sheldon Adelson—the gaming megabillionaire who has on occasion introduced himself as “the richest Jew in the world,” and who adores Israel—decided that he wanted to oust the Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, and install Bibi Netanyahu in his place.

Adelson and Olmert had been friends for many years, but Olmert, a longtime hard-liner on the Palestinian issue, had as prime minister come to embrace the idea of a two-state solution as the only way of preserving Israel as a democratic state with a Jewish majority. Adelson was apoplectic. His answer to the Jewish-Arab demographic trend-line was simple: “I think Jews should have lots of sex. That is the solution to our demographic problem.” Adelson spent nearly two hundred million dollars to launch a free daily newspaper, Israel Hayom, and set out to use it to help make Netanyahu prime minister; the daily, widely viewed as a Netanyahu mouthpiece, became known as Bibi-ton, and it attacked Olmert fiercely. Adelson could not take credit for the prime minister’s eventual demise—Olmert resigned after being indicted on charges of corruption—but he did play a crucial role in electing Netanyahu.

Now, Adelson is determined to use his money to oust President Barack Obama (“Sheldon hates Obama with a passion,” said someone who knows Adelson well), and make Newt Gingrich President. Adelson has supported Gingrich for many years because of their shared animus for labor unions and rightist views on Israel. But Gingrich may have risen even higher in Adelson’s esteem last month when he referred to the Palestinians as “an invented people”; in remarks to a group of young people visiting Israel, Adelson echoed Gingrich approvingly...MORE...LINK
Like taking candy from a baby: Laughing about how easy it is to swindle dumb American goyim out of casino profits and into fighting wars for Israel, Las Vegas Sands Jewish Zionist gambling mogul Sheldon Adelson

The Zionist racket sure is tight: Jewish Ted Koppel rebuffs Chris Mathews, covers for his warmongering, Israel-first son-in-law

Koppel keeps bat on shoulder

(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss -

Last night on Hardball, Chris Matthews went to commercial after teasing his next segment-- Ted Koppel on Super PACs. I turned to my wife and said, "Matthews wants to talk about Sheldon Adelson's attachment to Israel, and why he gave $5 million to Newt Gingrich's Super PAC. He can't do it himself-- but he can turn to a renowned and sagacious Jewish correspondent, and then Koppel can talk about it."

After the commercial, Matthews did just what I predicted:
Sheldon Adelson is very pro-Israeli. No surprise. He has a cause. He`s one to double-down with one candidate, because he believes Israel, the state of Israel, is in danger.
That was the end of it. Koppel had a lot to say about how Super PACs work but nothing about Adelson's agenda. Koppel backed away. The guy is all hat, no saddle. A pity-- Chris Matthews is looking for some backup on an important issue.

P.S. On the Jewish identity front, Koppel is married to a Catholic and has written that he has four Catholic children. His son-in-law Ken Pollack, now head of the Saban Center at the Brookings Institution, helped pave the way to the Iraq war...LINK

Is billionaire Jewish-American casino mogul's financing of Newt Gingrich motivated by anti-Mormonism, anti-Whiteness, or Jewish Zionist supremacism?

(By Chris Moore) -- In the video below, left-winger Max Blumenthal outlines the hard-core Zionist attacks on Ron Paul and Barack Obama. He also notes that Jewish-American casino mogul, billionaire Sheldon Adelson, is financing Newt Gingrich's attacks on Mitt Romney, and puzzles over why this might be, believing that Romney is as much of an Israel-firster as any of the other GOP contenders (excepting Ron Paul).

I wonder if Romney's Mormonism has anything to do with it?

The Mormons seem to be an up-and-coming force in America, and organized Jewry and its lackeys may be feeling threatened. For example, Kevin MacDonald notes here that New York Times writer Lee Siegel recently expressed Jewish racial anxiety over Romney's "Whiteness."

Siegel wrote that
The simple, impolitely stated fact is that Mitt Romney is the whitest white man to run for president in recent memory. Of course, I’m not talking about a strict count of melanin density. I’m referring to the countless subtle and not-so-subtle ways he telegraphs to a certain type of voter that he is the cultural alternative to America’s first black president. It is a whiteness grounded in a retro vision of the country, one of white picket fences and stay-at-home moms and fathers unashamed of working hard for corporate America.
As MacDonald sees it, "it is hard to imagine a more blatant recent example of fear and loathing of White America than Lee Siegel’s..."

Is it fear and loathing of Romney's "Whiteness" that disturbs the ethno-racially obsessed Sheldon Adelsons and Lee Siegels of the world, is it his Mormonism, is it the jealous, control-freak, Jewish supremacist agenda, or is it all of the above?

Here's Blumenthal discussing far-right Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's campaign to oust President Obama, and far-right Jewish-American Zionist mogul Sheldon Adelson's role in financing both Netanyahu and Gingrich to advance the Israel-first, Jewish supremacist war enterprise and agenda.

Fanatical Jewish racial hatred not just for Muslims; Whites perpetually in Jewry's gun sights, as well

Lee Siegel: The Horror of Implicit Whiteness

(The Occidental Observer) -- by Kevin MacDonald --

At TOO we often use the phrase “hostile elite” to describe our new, predominantly Jewish elite that has become ensconced in all the media high ground in America. Examples are legion, but it is hard to imagine a more blatant recent example of fear and loathing of White America than Lee Siegel’s “What’s race got to do with it?” (Well, maybe Rabbi Hammerman’s outburst against Tim Tebow comes close.) Published in the most mainstream of the mainstream media, the New York Times, Siegel is horrified by Romney’s Whiteness:
The simple, impolitely stated fact is that Mitt Romney is the whitest white man to run for president in recent memory. Of course, I’m not talking about a strict count of melanin density. I’m referring to the countless subtle and not-so-subtle ways he telegraphs to a certain type of voter that he is the cultural alternative to America’s first black president. It is a whiteness grounded in a retro vision of the country, one of white picket fences and stay-at-home moms and fathers unashamed of working hard for corporate America.
Mitt Romney the candidate of implicit Whiteness.

Romney reminds Siegel of the bad old 1950s when White people like Romney ran the country and supported Joe McCarthy, worked hard and had lots of babies. The new elite hates the old America with a passion. Here’s the photo accompanying Siegel’s piece:

Way too many White people. Good looking, healthy, rich White people. It’s enough to make a Jewish writer think pogroms and expulsions. Siegel longs for the day when the power of Whites is way less than it is now–when Whites don’t have the clout to matter much in presidential elections.

White America is retro. Obama is the personification of the new America. And the only trait that matters is that he is non-White.

On the other hand, retro America is racist to the core, and Romney’s Mormons are a “bastion of pre-civil-rights-America whiteness.”
Yes, since 1978 the church has allowed blacks to become priests [the link directs the reader to the LDS home page which features Jesus with non-White children]. But Mormonism is still imagined by its adherents as a religion founded by whites, for whites, rooted in a millenarian vision of an America destined to fulfill a white God’s plans for earth.
Sort of like Judaism as imagined by its adherents: founded by Jews, for Jews, and rooted in a millenarian vision of America and the rest of the world as destined to fulfill a Jewish G-d’s plans for His favorite (Chosen) people.

Siegel hates everything White, down to clean shirts. To be authentically White is to be overly clean, robotic, insincere, bland, sentimentally patriotic, and living in the time warp of small-town America—the bogeyman of two generations of Jewish intellectuals—and to believe that the Founding Fathers (those dead White guys who established the primitive America not yet defined by our hostile elite) may have had some good ideas that should inform how we do things in the contemporary US...MORE...LINK