Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Why does the New York Times insist on staffing its Israeli bureau with Jewish Zionist propagandists?

From:
Systematically Biased Reporting

On Israel, the New York Times is perniciously one-sided.
(Adbusters) -- by Matthew A. Taylor --

Although the spin is hard to detect for the average reader, New York Times reportage of Middle East affairs is perniciously biased. In their seminal book, Israel-Palestine on Record: How the New York Times Misreports Conflict in the Middle East, Princeton professor Richard Falk and media critic Howard Friel argue that “the Times regularly ignores or under-reports a multitude of critical legal issues pertaining to Israel’s policies, including Israel’s expropriation and settlement of Palestinian land, the two-tier system of laws based on national origin evocative of South Africa’s apartheid regime, the demolition of Palestinian homes, and use of deadly force against Palestinians.” In other words, what is not said by the New York Times may be even more important than what is said.

In June of 2010, a year and a half after the Israeli military launched what a United Nations investigation described as “a deliberately disproportionate attack designed to punish, humiliate and terrorize a civilian population,” the New York Times sent a photographer into Gaza to capture a slice of daily life. Ethan Bronner, the Times Jerusalem bureau chief, wrote the narrative for the photo essay entitled “Gaza, Through Fresh Eyes,” in which he gushes about “jazzy cellphone stores and pricey restaurants … endless beaches with children whooping it up … the staggering quality of the very ordinary.” Seemingly lifted from an apolitical travel magazine, Bronner’s article merely alludes to families who have been “traumatized,” and omits any mention of the UN allegations of recently committed Israeli war crimes and human rights violations. Other than an oblique reference to “destroyed buildings” and “rubble,” Bronner’s travelogue also elides the vast civilian infrastructure Israel destroyed during the onslaught, including chicken farms, a flour mill, a sewage treatment plant, a UN school, vast tracts of civilian housing, government buildings, a prison, police stations, TV stations, newspapers ... and between 600 and 700 factories, workshops and businesses. The impression left by Bronner? Gaza is an OK place; nothing remarkable to see there, least of all evidence of Israeli war crimes; move along, move along.

And yet, what is not disclosed is that Ethan Bronner is married to an Israeli citizen and has a son who is enlisted in the Israeli army. When news of these familial connections broke, Times public editor Clark Hoyt wrote an op-ed recommending that Bronner be reassigned to avoid any potential for bias. Executive editor Bill Keller refused, waiving the Times’s normally strict conflict of interest standards.

Times reporter Isabel Kershner is similarly compromised by elisions and distortions...MORE...LINK

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Gen. Wesley Clark explains how a (Judeofascist-centered) cabal of Bushcons and neocons hijacked U.S. foreign policy for war against Islam

From:
Wes Clark - America's Foreign Policy "Coup"

(YouTube.com) -- by ForaTv --



Chris Moore comments:

First these Judeofascists, leftists and globalist parasites declared war on Greco-Roman-Christian-Saxon Western civilization, culminating in the WWII swindle that manipulated the U.S. into coming in on the side of the treacherous Soviets (who at that point already had the blood of tens of millions of innocents on their hands, including tens of millions of Christians and two million Muslims).

Instead of immediately going to war against the Commies once the Nazis were dispatched as Gen. George S. Patton wanted to do, we simply divided Europe with the Soviet monsters (thanks to Judeofascist intrigue), which allowed time for ever more of Jewry to migrate West to ratchet up the war on Western civilization from within.

In the contemporary era, once the Judeofascists became confident that Christianity was dead and buried and the West firmly under their thumb, they began maneuvering for the current war against Islam, intrigue outlined by Gen. Wesley Clark above.

One problem: Christianity and Western civilization aren’t dead and buried, and are in fact rising from the ashes, which means the Judeofascists and their degenerate accomplices and collaborators are increasingly caught in a vice between a rising West and an awakened Islam.

Gee, I sure hope all those lowlifes will fit into Israel, the last refuge of Judeofascist scoundrels, and that they're willing to take in their filthy, thuggish, Gentile collaborators.

The West simply isn't big enough for all that trash.

Monday, August 29, 2011

Jewish propagandist working for government radio (NPR) ignores powerful Judeofascists, exaggerates threat of goofy dispensationalist Christians

From:
Terry Gross gives a fearful earful on a Christian movement seeking ‘dominion of politics, business and culture’

(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

Last week Terry Gross at "Fresh Air" gave two hours to people who are critical of Christian movements. First was an interview of Rachel Tabachnick, who has documented an evangelical movement to which Rick Perry has ties. Then novelist Tom Perrotta, whose latest book is The Leftovers (a takeoff on the Left-Behind series) was on to run down the apocalyptic Christian movement that believes in the rapture.

Yes I know it's all hokum, and some of it is dangerous hokum.

But these hours are evidence of a lack of proportion, and of a fear of Christian power. And Terry Gross is important because she's so intelligent and such a cultural gatekeeper. People in the blue states trust her judgment. My father, for one.
The Tabachnick interview was especially fear-producing:
Gross: An emerging Christian movement that seeks to take dominion over politics, business and culture in preparation for the end times and the return of Jesus is establishing a presence in American politics. The leaders are considered apostles and prophets, gifted by God for this role... My guest, Rachel Tabachnick, researches the impact of the religious right and end-time narratives on American politics.

Ms. RACHEL TABACHNICK: I would say the basic beliefs began with the idea of dominionism, and dominionism is simply that Christians of this belief system must take control over all the various institutions of society and government. They have some unusual concepts of what they call spiritual warfare that have not been seen before in other groups.
I'm sure that the movement is as unhinged as Tabachnick says, I find Rick Perry a scary figure. But I would challenge Gross and Tabachnick to show me the ways that this movement they are so afraid of has actually taken "dominion over politics, business and culture." I heard about a lot of political activity, but I didn't hear of any such concrete accomplishments.

I've written before that my whole political worldview was given to me by my mother in one phrase-- The Bastards. It was an understanding, of evil powerful Christian bastards who controlled our world, and it came out of the shtetl Jewish relationship with the czar in Russia.

It's not that there aren't Christian bastards in the world. Dick Cheney, to begin with, George W. Bush. And lo, Rick Perry. But the false bottom in the consciousness is the belief that Jews are always powerless. This is simply not very helpful at a time when Jews have fully entered the American establishment. It is striking that even as 1/5th of the Congress is in Israel as the guests of the Israel lobby, and Eric Alterman has the guts to write "a great many pundits in the media happen to be Jewish," Terry Gross is doing a show about Christians who want dominion over our politics and culture and business life...MORE...LINK

A handful of Judeofascist fanatics and Israel-firsters provide lion's share of ideological impetus behind nation-bankrupting war on Islam

From:
Important study shows that a small network is fostering widespread hatred of Islam inside US politics and public opinion

(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

On Friday, the Center for American Progress published an important and excellent study, called Fear, Inc: The roots of the Islamophobia network in the US. The study shows that the wave of Islamophobia in the U.S. --Americans mistrust Muslims more than they did even after 9/11-- is the product of a few energized individuals. And they're polluting our political discourse.

Specifically, it's a handful of exponents of Islamophobia, among them Daniel Pipes, Sharia-law "expert" David Yerushalmi (whom the NYT profiled in more neutral terms a couple weeks back), David Horowitz, and Steve Emerson, the CNN expert turned wingnut.
And the Center shows that they are getting money from just a few sources, but a ton of money at that. In short, a conspiracy, and an important one. You can't call it a conspiracy these days, it's a "network," or as Steve Walt says below, a "collaboration."

I'll get to excerpts of the report below, but the report recapitulates the history of neoconservatism. Recall that the Iraq war crusade was implanted into the American discourse in the '90s by the decided and earnest effort of a few true believers, backed by tons of money, who had a crazed theory of importing democracy to the Middle East by gunpoint, everywhere but in Israel/Palestine. And those beliefs soon swept the mainstream.

I'm hopeful that Islamophobia won't be so successful, and partly because the Center for American Progress has risen against it.

The report is careful to sidestep the Israel-motivation angle of the Islamophobes. I think this is intellectually irresponsible, but inevitable. No one in the Establishment wants to touch this angle. They don't want to be sounding like Walt and Mearsheimer, the Israel lobby. And of course, it's good that a portion of the Establishment is denouncing the ultra-Zionists. But supporting Israel is certainly an important part of the motivation, as I pointed out about Yerushalmi a few weeks back-- the Jewish right to Palestine is at the heart of his engagement, he even changed his name to Jerusalem. And donor Aubrey Chernick, whom the report focuses on -- well, again, Israel support is at the heart of his public actions.
Here are two quick takes on the report. Steve Walt at Foreign Policy:
The irony in all this that the extremists examined in this report have gone to great lengths to convince Americans that there is a vast Islamic conspiracy to subvert American democracy, impose sharia law, and destroy the American way of life. Instead, what we are really facing is a well-funded right-wing collaboration to scare the American people with a bogeyman of their own creation, largely to justify more ill-advised policies in the Middle East.
And Ed Lasky at American Thinker points out the Jewishness of the list, though he leaves out the fact that George Soros is also Jewish:
The Soros-supported Center for American Progress blames rich Jews for stoking Islamophobia...

The Obama-allied Center for American Progress has released a report that blames Islamophobia in America on a small group of Jews and Israel supporters in America, whose views are being backed by millions of dollars. This "network", according to the news release, have "have worked hard to push narratives that Obama might be a Muslim, that mosques are incubators of radicalization, and that "radical Islam" has infiltrated all aspects of American society -- including the conservative movement. Who are the figures mentioned as the promoters of prejudice? Most of them are prominent Jews and supporters of Israel, such as David Horowitz, Daniel Pipes and Steven Emerson (the founder of the Investigative Project on Terrorism). The eight foundations mentioned as funding this effort include are almost exclusively ones founded and funded by Jewish donors, and lest readers not be aware of this fact, the Center for American Progress lists not only the other beneficiaries of the charities and foundations (most of them having Jewish or Israel in the title) but also goes to the trouble of naming the individuals behind these charities -- not just the donors but also those who serve on the boards.
...MORE...LINK

Sunday, August 28, 2011

Having openly paid tribute to its Zionist masters, Black Caucus stands exposed as just another government-centered, tribal-fascist entity

From:
Congressional tourists avoid apartheid in Israel

(Salon.com) -- by By Ahmad Tibi --

As a Palestinian member of the Knesset, I know American lawmakers aren't being shown the reality of life here

Americans, do you know where your member of Congress is?

He or she may well be visiting Israel right now. In fact, 81 members of the House of Representatives -- nearly 20 percent of the whole body -- are expected here this month, according to new reports. If challenged, the representatives (numbering 55 Republicans and 26 Democrats) are likely to say a few words about looking for business opportunities good for their constituents or the need to provide for the security of Israel, which has cost American taxpayers billions of dollars. That's their business and yours. 
 


As a member of the Israeli Knesset, I am concerned that they're on a propaganda tour run by an affiliate arm of AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which bills itself as "America's leading pro-Israel lobby," yet has helped stymie Palestinian freedom aspirations for decades. Yes, the members will have a token meeting or two with officials of the Palestinian Authority, but they certainly are not going to learn of the discrimination and occupation that the state of Israel imposes on the Palestinian people in its midst.
 


The real story, tweeted by one wit, is whether any member of Congress would have accepted a trip paid for 20 years ago by an Anglo-Boer lobby-affiliated organization seeking to put a positive shine on apartheid South Africa. The Rev. Jesse Jackson, a leader in the anti-apartheid movement, certainly would not have taken a propaganda junket to legitimize whites-only neighborhoods.

Yet his son, Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., has visited here, where ethnic-religious discrimination is written into law. I dare say, Jackson heard very little about the more than 35 laws that discriminate against Palestinian citizens of Israel. I doubt Israeli officials volunteered information about the new legislation passed by the Knesset that subjects anyone who calls for a boycott of companies colonizing the West Bank and East Jerusalem to financial damages. 



As a member of Israel's large Palestinian national minority, I find Jackson's participation, along with five other members of the Black Caucus especially disappointing. As for delegation leaders Rep. Eric Cantor and Rep. Steny Hoyer, their shilling for Israel is business as usual. They've never expressed any alarm regarding Jewish settlers subjugating Palestinians, and I don't expect them to start now.

But I do expect Jackson and the other members of the caucus (other than Rep. Allen West, advocate of torturing Arabs) to reject colonization and racial discrimination. Their complacency in the face of modern-day colonization and their adoption of hard-line AIPAC positions stand in stark contrast to the beliefs of many Americans I have met who believe wholeheartedly that it is wrong for Israel to discriminate against Palestinians.

The visitors will be meeting with opposition parties in the Jewish state, but none of them -- not a single one -- is scheduled to meet with Palestinian members of the Knesset even though our existence is often highlighted when Israel's defenders seek to refute charges that Israel is an apartheid state. Israel does allow its Palestinian citizens to vote -- bully for them (this is the 21st century) -- but its commitment to discriminate against Palestinians is explicit and growing...MORE...LINK
-----------------------

Chris Moore comments:

This is the consequence of Judeofascists having been allowed to worm their way into leadership positions in America; naturally, as tribalists, they're using their power to impose Zionism (Jewish supremacism) as the country's moral authority.

Jesse Jackson Jr. and the Black Caucus are simply paying tribute to their Zionist masters, who own the Democratic Party.

What this proves is that so many of these anti-White, anti-Christian, special interest, tribal "minority" swindlers are just part and parcel of the post-Christian, post-Western, Zionist-racket system destined to end in fascist authoritarianism and mass murder just as has Zionism, and just as did Jewish Bolshevism.

Indeed, it's already well down that road, as the neocons and neoliberals have set about bombing Islamic women and children with impunity in a quest to continue Empire for as long as possible for Israel-first purposes, and in order maintain the dollar as the ultimate fiat currency by preserving its status as world reserve currency. In short, without U.S. hegemony, these leftist and fascist parasites like the Black Caucus and its constituency who dwell at the public trough and within huge, worthless government bureaucracies would have to actually work for a living and produce something instead of existing on Empire largesse, which itself floats on oceans of blood.

So the next time these "compassionate" and "kind-hearted" liberals and neoliberals say tea partiers are "mean spirited" and "selfish" for wanting to cut government all the way back to its essentials, remind them that the fiat credit that finances all their self-serving "generosity" and "compassion" is actually blood money coming out of the hides of women and children, and that they're as evil as anyone.

In fact, they may be even more evil, as they go about posing as morally superior "progressives" and open minded, peace-loving "liberals" even as they collaborate with Judeofascist and neocons in mass murder in order to finance their gratuitous lifestyles.

If the Palestinians think these liberal fascists are really ever going to risk the economic underpinning of their racket by seriously challenging the Zionist string-pullers, I'm afraid they're going to be sorely disappointed.

No, they'll continue to hold their tongues, let the Zionists have their way in the Middle East with impunity, as the lot of them wring their racket for all its worth until America economically collapses.

The only way the Palestinians will ever attain any kind justice is if the entire liberal fascist-neocon-Zionist racket is brought down to its knees and dispatched straight into hell where it belongs.

Zionist commissars run domestic spying CIA/NYPD black ops targeting religious freedom; where's Holder's Justice Dept. "civil rights" investigation?

From:
The Spy Next Door Comes from New York

(The American Conservative) -- by Philip Giraldi --

The recently revealed joint CIA/NYPD operations being run all along the Eastern Seaboard are, of course, completely illegal but are perhaps symptomatic of the past decade’s use of the word “terrorist” to excuse any and all bad behavior by law enforcement and intelligence agencies. The NYPD Intelligence Division and Counter-Terrorism Bureau, which incorporates a “dirty tricks” undercover Special Services Unit and a Terrorist Interdiction Unit that runs informants and maps the city’s “human terrain,” is headed by David Cohen, a former top CIA analyst. Its budget is $62 million per year.

To summarize for those who have not read the lengthy investigative report by Associated Press, the CIA had senior officers posted to New York City who worked directly with the NYPD to establish what amounted to an Agency Station within the police force. They instructed undercover cops, including one who was actually trained at the CIA’s “Farm” facility in Williamsburg Virginia, to recruit sources in the local Muslim communities and to use informants to search for possible terrorism hotspots in book stores, cafes, and mosques. NYPD officers and their own “snitch” sources did the trolling but they were directed by CIA officers and, ignoring normal police and FBI guidelines, did not require probable cause of criminal activity to initiate an operation.

Operations were run not only in New York, but throughout northern New Jersey and as far away as Massachusetts without any liaison with the local authorities or even with the FBI. Reports on every mosque in the New York area were compiled by undercover officers and informants. Liaison offices were established in eleven foreign cities, not unlike CIA stations. Apparently, only Muslims were targeted initially, though antiwar activists were also pursued by the Bureau during the 2004 Republican National Convention. Court documents reveal that one of the questions police asked protesters who were detained was “Do you hate George W. Bush?’

Cohen’s Bureau regularly shreds documents relating to its operations so there will be no paper trail. The FBI has refused to let its New York office even look at the information that is being collected by the NYPD intelligence unit because it considers it illegal. There are perhaps inevitably close ties with the Israelis, who have advised the New Yorkers on how to map the “human terrain” based on how they control the West Bank. A top Cohen deputy, Mordecai Dzikansky, headed the so-called Demographic Unit, which keeps records on ethnic communities. He somewhat ingenuously describes his version of demographics as “It’s not profiling. It’s a question of going where the problem could arise.” Dzikansky also was posted to Israel.

At a minimum, the NYPD intelligence unit is overwhelmingly targeting one religious community and illegally collecting information on American citizens and residents who are innocent of any crime. They are justifying doing so due to suspicion that someone might be contemplating a crime, which criminalizes thoughts rather than deeds and violates the First Amendment. They are violating their own rules for initiating an investigation as well as the guidelines set down by the FBI and are operating far removed from their jurisdiction in New York City under no legal authority. The CIA, for its part, is clearly engaged in and supporting domestic spying. The Bureau and Agency are also collaborating in illegally using CIA resources, as most of the officers in question seconded to New York were paid out of Langley and were presumably able to tap into sensitive Agency data bases.

I am waiting for Eric Holder to say something. Tell me Eric, will you launch a Justice Department investigation or will you ignore the whole matter, “looking forward” as your boss in the White House has so often recommended? If you choose to ignore it, presumably because you are interested in how New York City votes for 2012, it will be just one more chipping away at the liberties that we Americans used to enjoy. But we have become accustomed to that...LINK
------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

It seems the Obama administration only approves of religious freedom for those who subscribe to particularistic religious veins compatible with the official religion of the Jewish state; everyone else must be harassed, investigated and spied upon by Zionist-run "U.S." federal and state agencies.

Is there any difference between the Jewish Bolsheviks, the Jewish Zionists, the Jewish statist-liberals, the Jewish neocons...etc...and any of their pseudo-secular, left-wing and fascist offshoots? Not really, and here's why: Of common pedigree, the many noxious parallels between Communism and Zionism

Either one believes in freedom of religion (and most authentic Christians are confident that Christianity doesn't need state-backing to prevail as the center of the Western ethos) or one is a Zionist, (the Judaic equivalent of an Islamist) or one of their liberal fascist, neocon or Judeo-Christian Zionist gangster collaborators/useful idiots who needs to utilize the state to stack the odds in the favor of their particular grift, funnel money their own way, and generally put a yoke around the necks of average citizens to maintain their parasitic racket.

And of course, because organized Jewry is doctrinally racist in order, it believes, to preserve its "chosen" racial line, it won't proselytize and hence needs a powerful state (run by Zionist commissars like those Judeofascists listed in the article above) to impose Jewish moral authority and the Zionist ideology upon the country (and humanity) at the point of a gun.

It's clear that these Zionsts, all of them from bolshevik to statist liberal to neocon to Judeo-”Christian,” simply do not believe in freedom of religion, seek out state authority to impose an artificial Judaic moral authority upon the People, and hence are an artificial, alien, unnatural elite that is destined to be overrun by an organic leadership that emerges like a tsunami from the Western geist and flushes the lot of them either into Israel or back down into the gutters and sewers of Western society where they belong.

Saturday, August 27, 2011

Naive U.S. Jew advocating Palestinian rights in Israel learns Judeofascism isn't myth as thug Zionist cops harass then beat him on camera



Mean-spirited, insatiable enemies of Western civilization, Jewry mocks and insults Western icon Jesus mercilessly

From:
How The Jews Mock Jesus Christ

(Real Zionist News) -- by Nathanael Kapner --



Chris Moore comments:

Of course, most honest people know organized Jewry is the enemy of Christianity, and because Christianity is a central component of Western civilization, many recognize that Jewry is consequently an enemy of the Western ethos, as well.

What fewer people know or are willing to acknowledge is that Jewry's collaborators, including Judeo-Christian Zionists and "compassionate" Judeophile liberals are also the enemies of both Christianity and Western civilization, and enemies possibly as dangerous as Jewry, given that they pose as "Christians," "progressives," and "pro-Western" even as they collaborate with the most unabashedly anti-Christian, anti-Western degenerates on the face of the earth in organized Jewry.

A demonically possessed enemy charging straight at you with nostrils flaring and cloven feet tearing is in many important ways less of threat than the "ally" in your fox hole who strategically stabs you in the back just as you prepare to fire upon the demon.

To ever form a united front against the Judeofascist demon, Jewry's hidden and not-so-hidden collaborators and useful idiots must be identified and routed as well.

In some ways, we have been blessed by the fact that evil is so unabashedly and openly rallying around Jewry in this era, which makes identifying and eradicating it far cleaner, with far less collateral damage.

Those willing to "witness" for Jewry have essentially declared themselves in league with evil, and willing to die for it or with it.

Is it a sin to grant these their deepest, most heart-felt wish? Indeed, isn't it cheating God and the Furies not to?

Inglorious basturds: Judeofascist sadists arrest and terrorize twelve-year-old boys who may or may not have thrown stones

From:
How Israel takes its revenge on boys who throw stones

(The Independent) -- by Catrina Stewart --

The boy, small and frail, is struggling to stay awake. His head lolls to the side, at one point slumping on to his chest. "Lift up your head! Lift it up!" shouts one of his interrogators, slapping him. But the boy by now is past caring, for he has been awake for at least 12 hours since he was separated at gunpoint from his parents at two that morning. "I wish you'd let me go," the boy whimpers, "just so I can get some sleep."

During the nearly six-hour video, 14-year-old Palestinian Islam Tamimi, exhausted and scared, is steadily broken to the point where he starts to incriminate men from his village and weave fantastic tales that he believes his tormentors want to hear.

This rarely seen footage seen by The Independent offers a glimpse into an Israeli interrogation, almost a rite of passage that hundreds of Palestinian children accused of throwing stones undergo every year.

Israel has robustly defended its record, arguing that the treatment of minors has vastly improved with the creation of a military juvenile court two years ago. But the children who have faced the rough justice of the occupation tell a very different story.

"The problems start long before the child is brought to court, it starts with their arrest," says Naomi Lalo, an activist with No Legal Frontiers, an Israeli group that monitors the military courts. It is during their interrogation where their "fate is doomed", she says.

Sameer Shilu, 12, was asleep when the soldiers smashed in the front door of his house one night. He and his older brother emerged bleary-eyed from their bedroom to find six masked soldiers in their living room.

Checking the boy's name on his father's identity card, the officer looked "shocked" when he saw he had to arrest a boy, says Sameer's father, Saher. "I said, 'He's too young; why do you want him?' 'I don't know,' he said". Blindfolded, and his hands tied painfully behind his back with plastic cords, Sameer was bundled into a Jeep, his father calling out to him not to be afraid. "We cried, all of us," his father says. "I know my sons; they don't throw stones."

In the hours before his interrogation, Sameer was kept blindfolded and handcuffed, and prevented from sleeping. Eventually taken for interrogation without a lawyer or parent present, a man accused him of being in a demonstration, and showed him footage of a boy throwing stones, claiming it was him.

"He said, 'This is you', and I said it wasn't me. Then he asked me, 'Who are they?' And I said that I didn't know," Sameer says. "At one point, the man started shouting at me, and grabbed me by the collar, and said, 'I'll throw you out of the window and beat you with a stick if you don't confess'."...MORE...LINK

Israel-first Jewish Zionist neocon and pro-Iraq war propagandist William Krisotol's main concern about Rick Perry: "Is he good for the Jews?"

From:
Jews for Perry?

Rick Perry: Is he good for the Jews?
(The Weekly Standard) -- by WILLIAM KRISTOLS --

Andrew Ferguson inexplicably neglected, in his fascinating and entertaining piece on Rick Perry in the current issue, to raise the question that’s surely on so many readers’ minds: But is he good for the Jews?...MORE...LINK

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Wealthy Wall Street Jews switch hosts, Obama to Romney; Israel first behind the migration?

From:
Obama’s Wall Street defectors to Romney include strong supporters of Israel

(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

Earlier this year the Wall Street Journal said that unnamed "Jewish donors" were warning Obama that his Israel policies were alienating them.

Well now The Hill reports that 67 Wall Street executives who gave to Obama the last time around are moving to Mitt Romney. The Hill cited five executives by name:
Joshua Harris of Apollo Management, who recently bought the Philadelphia 76ers.... Oscar Schafer of OSS Capital Management, David Solomon of Goldman Sachs, Barry Sternlight [sic; his name is Sternlicht] with the Starwood Capital Group and David Blitzer of the Blackstone Group.
The Hill cited economic reasons for the exodus. The execs feel "betrayed" by Obama's rhetoric about Wall Street, it said, without quoting anyone by name. But I would point out that according to searches of federal filings, three of the five have given to pro-Israel causes (and a fourth, Schafer, to Jewish ones)...MORE...LINK
--------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

This relates to my contention that the Fed and its bankster cronies are using taxpayer funds to determine the outcome of elections.

Even though he's surrounded by Jews and the Democratic Party is essentially owned by Jewry, Obama hasn't been Israel-first enough for Zionist fanatics, so these Wall Street parasites upon the American body politic are switching to Romney.

Remember, they are only so wealthy because of their Jewish network and its connections to the Jewish-run Fed (hence wealthy at the expense of average American and the plunder of their credit, hence parasitic), so essentially the outcome to this election and so many others (not to mention the outcome of so many Big Government public policy decisions that are destroying America) are being determined by Jewish parasites who have funneled taxpayer money to themselves, and are using those funds to pull the levers of history in their favor and the favor of those goyim low enough to collaborate with them, and against the interests of Gentile humanity.

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Unprecedented number of Jewish-Americans seeking to serve their nation rush to join the army...the Israeli army, that is

From:
Young Americans flock to Israel to join army

(Big News Network.com) --

Hundreds of new immigrants from the U.S. landed at Ben Gurion Airport in Israel on Tuesday.

An unprecedented 104 of the 360 new arrivals, came to enlist in the Israeli army.

Brig. Gen. Eli Shermeister, the Chief Education Officer, was among a delegation of officials on hand to greet the 18 to 22 year olds.

"It's an honor to have you join the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) and the Israeli nation," the Brig. Gen. said. "There are no words to describe my appreciation for you, your courage and the Zionistic values you hold. The State of Israel is coping with security threats every day and defending its security is the main goal of the IDF."

The Chief Education Officer told the new immigrants he is proud that the IDF "is an army that focuses on educating the youth and building Israeli society. Those of you who will soon be soldiers, I promise you: there is a special place for every single one of you in the IDF."

The Minister of Immigrant Absorption Ms. Sofa Landver also welcomed the new recruits. "Young people coming to Israel to enlist in the army strengthen not only the country's defense but also the national strength," she said.

All 104 of the IDF's inductees want to see action. The boys (61 of them) have applied to join Israel's elite special forces units, while the the girls (43 of them) have asked to serve in either the combat canine unit, as medics, injury NCOs, education NCOs or as shooting instructors.

"My brother enlisted with the same program two years ago and he currently serves in the Givati Brigade. He told me a lot of stories and encouraged me to enlist," Idan from New Jersey said Tuesday. "My mom lives in New Jersey and my dad lives in Israel so I've always had these two worlds and a deep connection to Israel. And now I am here, waiting to started my military service hopefully in the Paratroopers Brigdae."...LINK

Monday, August 22, 2011

Congressman Pat Meehan at edge of brewing political storm portending huge backlash against congressional Israel-first treachery

(By Chris Moore, LibertarianToday.com) -- On August 10th, Pennsylvania Congressman Pat Meehan posted an item on his blog proudly declaring that he's one of the 81 members of the U.S. Congress (nearly 1/5 of the entire congressional body) that is going on a luxurious, all-expenses-paid, Israel lobby-funded junket to the Jewish state.

Noted Meehan
:
This trip, sponsored by the American Israel Education Fund and funded without the use of any taxpayer dollars, is an opportunity for members of Congress to continue this critical dialogue with Israel’s leadership and enhance cooperation between our nations.
But based on the Washington Post's description, the trip is going to be closer to a combination of luxury vacation and state-orchestrated, indoctrination tourism and programming.
...the excursion includes a round-trip flight in business class for lawmakers and their spouses (that alone is worth about $8,000), fine hotels and meals, side trips, and transportation and guides.

Unlike a proper congressional trip, we’re told that the AIPAC foundation “runs [the members] pretty good.”

There will be breakfast speakers, dinner speakers, Q&A’s with U.S. Embassy folks and Israeli media. There will be appearances by government leaders, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (ask him about those recent demonstrations) and President Shimon Peres, as well as by opposition leaders. The schedule is packed from morning to late at night.

But wait. It’ll be okay. Judging from past trips — they’re not giving out the schedule for security reasons — the travelers will get a walking tour of the Old City and the Western Wall, plus a tour of the city, trips to Masada and the Dead Sea, the Holocaust Memorial, a trip north to the Golan Heights and to the border with Lebanon. There will be a couple of days to hang out in Tel Aviv — Miami on the Mediterranean.
The response in the comments section to Meehan's blog post was immediate, decisive and severely critical. In fact, it was so critical that Meehan's office apparently removed the comments from the blog in an effort to control the political damage and pull the curtain over what is clearly viewed by most of Meehan's constituency as shameful act of Israel first treachery.

Fortunately, Daily Kos tracked down a screenshot of Meehan's censored page before it could be scrubbed of the comments, and hence the visceral, organic reaction of his constituency was preserved despite his staff's best efforts to flush it down the Orwellian memory hole.

Here are the first four comments, which provide merely a taste of the dozens that follow of nearly the same flavor:
Michael F Rivero 6 days ago

There is a reason that members of Congress are not supposed to accept free trips from lobbyists and foreign governments, and the fact that Congress has voted thorough a specific exemption for Israel does not erase the questions from the public mind as to why members of Congress voted into office and paid from US taxpayer dollars, are using that taxpayer-funded time to act as the "Vichy Government" for a foreign power, let alone accepting trips to Israel for a week of obvious political indoctrination!

No government can serve two masters, and a government that serves Israel cannot serve the American people. A friend to Israel is no friend of America. America needs leaders who will put America first, second, and third.

Please remember who you are supposed to work for and represent. This election I am making it my one mission that every politician who screams about how much they love Israel will be voted out of office, so that they free to go live there for the rest of their lives.
-----
Shaktas Na 6 days ago in reply to Michael F Rivero

The nice censors do not like that I have questioned Pat's loyalty...

So again...who are you truly loyal to Pat? America or Israel?
-----
upppity serf 6 days ago in reply to Michael F Rivero

Well, it's not like you have anything more important to do in your own country. We're so lucky to have misrepresentatives like you that put the agenda of another country before the needs of your own people who elected you to office and pay your salary. We know you need a vacation from accepting campaign contributions from mega-corporations, Wall St and Israel. We will be happy to accommodate you all. All the dual citizens, Israel-firsters, endless war and occupation supporters, transnationalists, open border/North American Union traitors, central bank supporters bringing our country to destruction as the Congress go on indoctri-cation in Israel, you all need to be removed from office ASAP. Give the war crimes a break, stop making us more enemies by colluding to attack Iran and Syria next with another government that is also committing war crimes, even against US! Remember the Israeli spy rings in America, the aid flotilla, the USS Liberty, and the Dancing Israelis on 9/11. Get a grip on who you are sucking up to.
-----
sonamericanrevolution 6 days ago in reply to Michael F Rivero

I agree with you fully Mike Rivero! I don't know how someone could get elected to kindergarten
dogcatcher who could not see the obvious conflict of interest in going to israel-----free or not.

Bad (good?) things happen on those trips. NJ Governor McGreevey got a gay lover who turned out to be a mossad agent on one of those trips! McGreevey loved his mossad sexionage lover so much he brought him back to NJ to make him Home Land Insecurity Director of New Jewsey!

Mossad will deliver sexpionage agents to America, you don't have to go all the way to israhell for them. Ask Bill Clinton, he laid back and let it happen without even leaving home!
I urge readers here to visit the Daily Kos page and read more of the comments captured on a screenshot of Meehan's site prior to censorship to get a feel for the outrage brewing at the huge factions from both parties in a corrupted Congress that have put Israel's interests ahead of America's.

It's increasingly clear to average Americans across the country that there's something rotten in Washington, and that the Israel lobby has its fingerprints all over the politicians who have gutted America. No longer will they be given a "pass" on their Israel first treachery by mouthing pro-Zionist platitudes, and Meehan is just one of 81 members of Congress, and the hundreds who have participated in similar indoctrination trips to Israel over the years before them, who are now in the public spotlight and at the edge of a brewing political scandal.

And this is likely just the beginning. By the time this political storm, which is actually closer to a weather pattern that could take years to complete its cycle, has passed over the Washington establishment, the political landscape in this country might look very different than it does today.

-------------------------
Congressman Patrick Meehan of Pennsylvania, one of at least 81 congressional Israel-firsters, in the spotlight and facing the wrath of an angry constituency

Saturday, August 20, 2011

Even many Jewish Israelis finally begin to realize that Zionist Jewry is insatiably "swinish"

From:
Israel's swinish Zionism ought to be stopped


Israel tycoons have woken up to the new reality; they're beginning to pay the price for their behavior - their capitalism has been defined as swinish.
(Haaretz) -- by Gideon Levy --

There's a remarkable resemblance in Israel between Zionism and wealth: Both have not known when to stop. These days we're talking about "swinish capitalism," a term coined by President Shimon Peres back when he was an MK; he was referring in particular to Benjamin Netanyahu, who was finance minister at the time and is now prime minister. It's worth remembering that there is also swinish Zionism.

Swine are insatiable, it is thought. They eat everything that comes their way and gorge themselves until they die. So do capitalism and Zionism. A broad (and encouraging ) public now agrees about the swinishness of Israeli capitalism; the perception of Zionism as swinish is still the province of a tiny minority in Israel, though not around the world. Zionism and capitalism started differently...

A great many of this country's wealthy people also started out well. One family established a salt industry, another a modest dairy, this one founded a shipping company, that one started out as a building contractor and a third began as an importer of mobile telephones. They helped develop the economy, building the land and its prosperity.

But here too with the eating came the insatiable appetite, and some of them did not know when to stop their greed. They shower huge salaries on their executives, celebrate their family events lavishly, lead an ostentatious life and treat the public's money as if it were their own, leveraging money that does not belong to them.

Now the time of reckoning has come. The public is calling them to account. The word "tycoon" has become a curse and "wealthy" has nearly become despicable. Had our wealthy people stopped their greed in time, they would have continued to celebrate on top of the world, or on top of this country at least, if also with relative modesty.

The public's attitude to these two kinds of swinishness is remarkably similar. At first society bowed down to its wealthy, in the same way it bowed down to its settlers in the territories, its "new pioneers." It looked away and hid its face both from the way the tycoons were making their money and the way the settlers were putting down their stakes. The state treated them that way too; it encouraged both groups. To the wealthy and the settlers it offered everything good - incentives and protection, grants and loans. It sold natural resources and companies to the tycoons at bargain prices and gave the lands of the occupation to the settlers for free.

The state was protective of both these groups. It still is, with a committee for the tycoons and the continuation of its pro-settler policies.

The tycoons have woken up to the new reality. In the summer of 2011 it's not so pleasant to be Yitzhak Tshuva, Nochi Dankner, Ilan Ben-Dov or Idan Ofer. They're beginning to pay the price for their behavior - their capitalism has been defined as swinish. This isn't the case regarding the new Zionism, the Zionism of occupation and settlement in the territories. To call it swinish is still considered heretical. But when the time for the reckoning comes we'll ask: Why didn't we stop this swinishness in time?...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

Organized Jewry (Zionism) is a grasping, greedy, insatiable, gangster enterprise.

When it is in the minority, it insatiably prays upon the "Gentiles"; when it is in the majority, it insatiably preys upon the "Gentiles" AND the "lesser" Jews.

It simply can't control itself or its corrupt nature, which flows from its corrupt ethno-religious doctrine. And as this article makes clear, even Jews (at least the ones with an iota of conscience) are beginning to realize there's something terribly wrong with their relatives.

This is one reason that organized Jewry, despite its multi-millennial continuity, still has a relatively tiny number of adherents: the decent Jews, the ones with a conscience, eventually throw up their hands and leave the crazies to their teeth-gnashing, swinishness, scheming, polarizing Judeofascist doctrine, and greed.

Why can't America exchange its Jewish Zionist psychopaths and gangsters for the Jews of conscience in Israel? And while we're at it, let's send them our Judeo-Christian Zionists, neocons and liberal fascist Judeophiles. That way the entire lot can stew in its collective bile together, and the sane world can role its eyes and keep them all at a safe distance.

Successive jackass generations of defective WASPs allowed Jewry to swindle America right out from under them

From:
Philip Weiss on the Disintegration of WASP Society

(The Occidental Observer) -- by Kevin MacDonald --

Philip Weiss, whom I once described as “a Jew without all the usual rationalizations and blind spots–at least most of them,” has a Mondoweiss column commenting on the collapse of WASP America (“WASP society is disintegrating“). It starts out with one of his WASP inlaws commenting on the decline his tribe. Weiss asked him if he “grieve[d] for its passing?”
No, he said. Things change. Orders change all the time. It’s the nature of society. And besides, we had a good run.

How broad-minded of him. “Oh, well. We lost fair and square. Life goes on.” I am sure he takes great pride in being known far and wide as tolerant, principled, and fair-minded–a moral paragon; an upstanding member of his community; an example to one and all; a virtual saint. Just the sort of guy you would want in your hunter-gatherer band of non-relatives during the Ice Age.

The bloodless (so far) coup made possible by valuing principles more highly than power comes to its fruition. In this he reminds me of Justice Paul Stevens‘ “strong sense of principle–even to the extent of making decisions that could not possibly be seen as helping his ethnic group.”

Such people do not think of the power of their ethnic group as a vital necessity in a world still fraught with ethnic conflict–including, most relevantly, the conflict between the new elite and the people they rule over. They don’t think of their loss of power as a catastrophic blow that will make them vulnerable to non-White ethnic coalitions with festering historical grudges against people like them. One of the characteristic flaws of WASPs, as noted by Eric Kaufmann, was to think that other peoples are “just like them,” so that the people who replace them will be just like them in the sense that they will uphold the same ideals. The republic will live on but with different faces–a utopian idea, to say the least.

An implicit (actually, often explicit) conceit of the Jewish ascendancy is that Jews created a meritocracy and thus elbowed out the WASPs who were given to snobbish networking and had little talent. Here Weiss discusses an English professor who had the misfortune to come along at a time when talent mattered. “The rules changed for academic advancement, the meritocracy came in, my friend was completely intimidated by that new way, and he absented himself. He frittered his life away,” but at least he was good a quoting Shakespeare.

Weiss mentions Elena Kagan as a symptom of the new, predominantly Jewish elite. During the her confirmation process, Prof. Noah Feldman sounded the meritocracy theme–as well as the theme of WASP dedication to principle:
Satisfaction with our national progress [by having 3 Jews on the Supreme Court and no WASPs] should not make us forget its authors: the very Protestant elite that founded and long dominated our nation’s institutions of higher education and government, including the Supreme Court. Unlike almost every other dominant ethnic, racial or religious group in world history, white Protestants have ceded their socioeconomic power by hewing voluntarily to the values of merit and inclusion, values now shared broadly by Americans of different backgrounds. The decline of the Protestant elite is actually its greatest triumph. (See here.)
But this leads to the ultimate irony: Kagan is remarkably unqualified to be a Supreme Court Justice in terms of the usual standards: judicial experience, academic publications, or even courtroom experience–the Harriet Miers of the left; described by Senator Jeff Sessions asthe least experienced nominee “at least in the last 50 years.” Rather, all the evidence is that Kagan owes her confirmation to her Jewish ethnic connections (see also here). It must be nice to be appointed dean of Harvard Law by the corrupt and stridently Jewish Larry Summers after failing to show sufficient commitment to scholarship to be able to return to her position at the University of Chicago. Ethnic connections indeed.

The new elite is at least as corrupt as the old elite, and there is no reason at all to suppose that they are principled like their WASP forebears. In fact, from the standpoint of the universalist principles trumpeted by the Left, strong ethnic identifications so rampant among our Jewish elite are the very antithesis of principle—what’s good for the Jews and all that.

Weiss provides his theory of the rise of the Jews in the 1960s, openly challenging the WASP elites:
Much of the 60s rebellion had a political character, but some of it was social, too, against the WASP elite. At Columbia during the 60s rebellion, the students had researched their professors to find out how much of their income came out of the defense contractors. And a lot of those rebellious students were Jewish, their parents ran candy stores or other small businesses, and as SDS leader Mark Rudd said a few years ago (in this piece on Why there were so many Jews in the SDS), the administration offices at Columbia were “dripping with goyishness.” So there was a social component to that too, it wasn’t just about power.
Right. It was about power and about eradicating the culture of the old elite. It was ethnic displacement, decapitating American society and replacing its elite with a Jewish elite. (I made the same point citing the same Mark Rudd article in recounting my experiences on the left in the 1960s. A citation would be cool.)

Weiss goes on:
I wonder when people will begin to describe the new elite. We shy away from doing so because it engages issues of anti-semitism, but if you think of that self-contained WASP society, the only thing to contend with it, in term of social cohesion, is affluent Jewish society, the Jewish mandarins of New York and Washington. No one has given us a name– the media industrial complext? Writers like David Brooks avoid the subject because it would involve talking about the Israel lobby.
Well, I have been trying to describe the new elite–my usual phrase is Jews as a “hostile elite“–hostile to the traditional people and culture of America in a way that was completely foreign to the WASPs. It is also an elite that is absolutely dedicated to the welfare of a foreign country to which they have ethnic ties. The old elite may have had an attachment to England, but, after all, they represented a substantial percentage of the population; this attachment was rooted in the entire history of the US. The new elite is promoting the ethnic interests of a tiny percentage of the population with only a marginal role to play in American history until the early decades of the 20th century...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

Jewry has exploited the post-Holocaust good will that the two immediate post-WWII generations of WASPs (the Silent Generation and the Boomers) were stupid, weak and corrupt enough to grant them, to the absolute maximum.

But I’ve also always sensed there was something innately corrupt and degenerate about the “leadership” of those generations as well, something innately defective. Think Cheney, think Rumsfeld, think Clinton, think G.W. Bush.

Utter jackasses, all.

Jewry came along, as it always does, whispered in their ears, flattered their hubris, called them “essential” to saving the world, dazzled and seduced them with bright lights, shiny objects, and the prospects of glamour and glory...and immediately swindled the country out from under them, and are now ringing it for all it is worth.

Of course, had these jackasses internalized Christianity 101, namely, that you simply can’t trust organized Jewry any time, any place, any way, any how, none of this would have happened.

***

In the discussion of this article at its home at Occidental Observer, some commenters raised the question whether Weiss can be trusted or not. Maybe this will shed a little light.

Back before I was banned from Mondoweiss by Weiss for criticizing his pro-Obamunist activism by stereotyping Whites in solidarity with Andrew Sullivan's defense of Obamunism, I remember Weiss writing something that seemed to be sent my direction along the lines that Weiss was giving up his Jewish religion so he expected good will, and even expected others (Christians in particular) to match him by decrying their own religions.

What I didn’t say it at the time, but thought about later, is that Weiss isn’t really giving up anything, because he isn’t dropping the organized Jewish racket, merely seeking to morph it back into something resembling Judeo-Bolshevism.

“Liberal” Jews can decry Zionism and even Zionist Jewry all they want, but unless they’re willing to drop their state-centered or state-utilizing, self-serving ethno-Jewish political rackets, and 99% of them aren’t, then they aren't really changing their ways, and don’t deserve good will in return.

I would say Weiss probably deserves a “thank you” for providing honest insight and discussion as to how his tribe operates, and for challenging the veil of silence over any negative discussion of Jewry, but then he blows it by engaging in leftist politics with other leftist Jews.

Until they drop their political ethno-racketeering entirely, even anti-Zionist Jews don’t deserve the benefit of the doubt in other areas.

Friday, August 19, 2011

Yet another pseudo-conservative, Judeofascist neocon authoritarian attempts to dictate conservatism, expel Ron Paul from GOP, tea party leadership

From:
Mark Levin, Ron Paul, and Conservatism

(The New American) -- by Jack Kerwick, Ph.D --

...Reagan aside, judging from the policy prescriptions endorsed by Levin and all self-avowed “Reagan conservatives,” the verdict that “Reagan conservatism” is evidently synonymous with neoconservatism is inescapable. Levin, for example, expresses zero regrets for having lent his enthusiastic, unqualified support behind George W. Bush’s mission to transform the Middle East into a bastion of “democracy” via the Afghan and Iraq wars — a project that, few people can now seriously deny, was fatally flawed in both conception and design. For that matter, Levin had been a virtually uncritical supporter of Bush’s agenda generally, an agenda that no one remotely familiar with conservatism could honestly characterize in those terms.

Why does all of this matter? Well, Levin, you see, is not too terribly fond of Ron Paul, and he spares no occasion to dismiss the Texan congressman as a crank. Recently, he reiterated his claim that Paul is neither “a real conservative” of any kind nor “the Father of the Tea Party.” My objective here is to show that whether Levin’s remarks on Paul’s relationship to conservatism and the Tea Party are sound or not, given his commitment to precisely that vision of the world and concomitant style of governing against which traditional conservatives and Tea Partiers are now railing, he hasn’t the authority to pass these sorts of judgments.

To put it more simply, Levin is the one who is not a real conservative. And he certainly is not a Tea Partier. If Levin were a real conservative or Tea Partier, he would have been outraged over the foreign and domestic policies of George W. Bush and his Republican-controlled Congress. In the real world, though, Levin endorsed many of these policies. If Levin were a real conservative, he would have long ago recognized the irresolvable conflict between simultaneously championing “limited government,” on the one hand and, on the other, an interminable “War on Terror,” for the latter theoretically justifies every conceivable instance of government intervention both here and abroad.

Ron Paul, though, has steadfastly opposed the very same governmental activism that Levin has always supported — and he did so before opposition to it became popular among Republicans. Paul was a Tea Party of one before the Tea Party movement emerged.

As recently as 2008, many may recall the derision with which Ron Paul was met when he warned audiences and his colleagues about the impending economic crisis. He was roundly ridiculed when he sounded the alarm over the ruinous practices of the Federal Reserve, and mocked just as loudly when he remarked — repeatedly — upon our inability to sustain the stratospheric costs in treasure and blood exacted by our “War on Terror.”

The political tides have turned in just three years, and this is indeed a good thing. Yet in spite of the fact that time has vindicated Paul, and in spite of the fact that by every objective criteria — fund raising, poll results, influence with “independents” and “moderates” — Paul is a serious presidential candidate, his fellow Republicans and other “Reagan conservatives” like Levin haven’t so much as apologized for the unjust treatment to which they subjected him before circumstances proved that he was right and they were wrong.

Far from admitting the error of their ways, they continue to treat Paul disrespectfully by suspending their negligence of his accomplishments just long enough to insult him. Coverage of this year’s Ames Straw Poll is a classic instance of this tendency...MORE...LINK

The problem with tribalism-serving "civil rights" acts: Judeofascists exploit Title VI to censor criticism of Jewish supremacist Zionism, racketeering

From:
AJC disavows staffer’s statement on campus anti-Semitism

(JTA) --

NEW YORK (JTA) -- The American Jewish Committee disavowed a statement from a staffer who criticized efforts to use federal civil rights law to respond to anti-Israel activism on campus.

In an e-mail, the AJC's executive director, David Harris, called the April statement by Kenneth Stern, the group's director on anti-Semitism and extremism, "ill advised" and expressed regret over its release.

"Unfortunately, AJC’s internal system of checks and balances did not function well in this case," Harris said in his Aug. 9 e-mail, as reported by the Forward.

Stern's statement, which was co-signed by Cary Nelson, president of the American Association of University Professors, suggested that some supporters of Israel are distorting the provisions of Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits federally funded institutions or programs from discriminating on the basis of race and national origin.

Some in the Jewish community have accused colleges of discriminating against Jewish students by allowing anti-Israel professors and activists to foster a hostile and anti-Semitic atmosphere on their campuses. Last year, the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights clarified that anti-Semitic harassment of Jews based on shared ancestry or ethnicity was covered under Title VI.

In their statement, Stern and Nelson criticized the manner in which some have responded to allegations of campus anti-Semitism.

"Opposing anti-Israel events, statements, and speakers, they believe the only way to 'protect' Jewish students is by imposing censorship," Stern and Nelson wrote...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

This is why America and the entire West, really, is being balkanized and tribalized by self-serving tribal ethnic "identity" groups who don't want to assimilate into Western civilization or the American melting pot. Tribalistic Jewry and others following their precedent have exploited these types of laws, which were originally designed to keep an intolerant majority from discriminating against individual minorities, to advance their own group agenda at the expense of others, extort material concessions from the majority, and generally engage in primitive, anti-Western ethnic racketeering and tribal fascism, as is the case with the Judeofascist Zionists.

Instead of serving the interests of the assimilated, melting pot majority, government instead becomes the agent and advocate of these fascist tribalists (under the guise of "protecting" them from "discrimination,") and the entire country gets turned upside down by its own government; the tail starts wagging the dog.

This can only end in seething resentments, tribal warfare, consequential government totalitarianism, and endless conflict.

Any of these fascist tribes who don't want to assimilate into the Western melting pot, governed by Western values, pursuing the traditional Western ethos, should return to their tribal ancestral homelands.

After all, if they don't subscribe to the Western ethos, why do they even want to live in the West?

Oh, that's right...to pursue the ageless tribal grift in the vein of Jewry, and exploit, plunder, and extort the Western masses for money and military conquest on behalf of their own fascist tribes and ethnic agendas.

How much longer are the assimilated Western masses going to put up with this primitive, ethno-fascist nonsense out of these peoples?

Jewish supremacist government: U.S. State Dept. funds Zionist propaganda institute that inspired Norwegian terrorist Anders Breivik

From:
The U.S. State Department has awarded the Middle East Media Research Institute, or MEMRI, $200,000 in funding toward its research on anti-Semitism.

(Press TV) -- by Marjan Asi --

This move is being criticized by many Americans who view MEMRI, a controversial media watchdog and translation organization, as a propaganda tool for a particular foreign policy position.

MEMRI has come under scrutiny for being selective in what it chooses to translate as well as inaccuracy in its translating.

Most recently, MEMRI was cited by the Norway terrorist in his manifesto. Anders Breivik mentions MEMRI or MEMRITV 23 times in justifying his Islamophobic sentiments.

In a press release announcing the grant, the State Department said it was funding a MEMRI project, “that documents anti-Semitism, Holocaust denial and Holocaust glorification in the Middle East.” But according to Alison Weir of the Council for the National Interest, bigotry against other groups is much more prevalent.

Additionally, MEMRI's founders include Israeli military intelligence officials and its advisors include, former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, right-wing politician John Bolton, Norman Podhoretz and Bernard Lewis, all Bush-era conservatives which Weir argues is unbalanced in coverage of Middle East media.

Neither the State Department nor MEMRI responded to interview requests...MORE...LINK

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Beginning of the end of U.S. Jewish-supremacist double standards? Leahy Law seeks to hold Jewish state to same human rights standards as everyone else

From:
Hold Israel accountable with Leahy law

(The Hill) -- by Josh Ruebner --

Apologists for Israeli occupation and apartheid claim that advocates for holding Israel accountable for its human rights abuses of Palestinians are “singling Israel out for extra scrutiny” or “holding Israel to a higher standard than other countries.”

Yet, ironically, Israel’s supporters also claim that U.S. military aid to Israel is sacrosanct and, unlike every other governmental program on the chopping block these days, cannot be questioned due to the “special U.S.-Israeli relationship." Dan Carle, a spokesperson for Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), has noted correctly that you cannot have your cake and eat it too.

In response to an article in the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz suggesting that the Vermont Senator will attempt to apply sanctions to certain units of the Israeli military for human rights violations, Carle explained that “the [Leahy] law applies to U.S. aid to foreign security forces around the globe and is intended to be applied consistently across the spectrum of U.S. military aid abroad. Under the law the State Department is responsible for evaluations and enforcement decisions and over the years Senator Leahy has pressed for faithful and consistent application of the law.”

The possibility of Senator Leahy consistently applying this eponymous legislation and holding Israel to the exact same standard as every other country has Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, whose office may have leaked the story in an effort to kill the initiative, in a tizzy.

The “Leahy Law,” as it is commonly known, prohibits the United States from providing any weapons or training to “any unit of the security forces of a foreign country if the Secretary of State has credible evidence that such unit has committed gross violations of human rights.” In the past, this law has been invoked to curtail military aid to countries as diverse as Indonesia, Colombia, Pakistan, and the Philippines. Along with other provisions in the Foreign Assistance Act, of which it is a part, and the Arms Export Control Act, it forms the basis of an across-the-board policy that is supposed to ensure that U.S. assistance does not contribute to human rights abuses.

Ha’aretz reports that the Senator is looking to invoke this prohibition regarding “Israel Navy's Shayetet 13 unit, the undercover Duvdevan unit and the Israel Air Force's Shaldag unit.” The inclusion of specific units in the story may indicate that Leahy already has findings from the Secretary of State that these Israeli military units have committed human rights abuses.

If so, then this could be a much-overdue watershed in holding accountable Israel, the largest recipient of U.S. military aid, for its gross misuse of U.S. weapons to commit systematic human rights abuses of Palestinians living under Israel’s illegal 44-year military occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza Strip. During the last decade, on at least five occasions, Members of Congress have requested the State Department to investigate Israel’s misuse of U.S. weapons; to date, the State Department has failed to notify publicly the Congress about any such violation. The State Department also has refused to disclose documents related to these investigations in response to a long-standing Freedom of Information Act request filed by the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation...MORE...LINK
---------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

It's way past time that organized Jewry be held to the same moral, ethical and behavioral standards as everyone else. Instead of advancing the human condition in the decades since the Holocaust, they've instead wrung their "victim" status for all its worth in order to advance their own, self-serving Judeofascist-racketeering agenda.

What has the West gotten in return for giving Jewry a post-WWII "pass" time and again no matter how atrocious its behavior, and for promoting it to such disproportionate representation in the highest echelons and institutions in America?

Endless wars, financial treachery and Wall Street rip-offs, gutter political "leadership," social and cultural pollution relentlessly spewed by Hollywood and mass media, Big Government corruption, cronyism and graft, Ponzi scheme, boom-bust economic cycles, corporatist job export and the hollowing out of the American economy, massive American debt hoisted on the shoulders of young Americans...the list just goes on and on.

Give these Judeofascists an inch, and they'll take ten miles...and then foreclose on the last 10 square feet on which they so "charitably" allowed you to squat.

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Jewish ADL first incites domestic anti-Islamic environment, then accuses Christians of hate -- all to leverage "anti-terrorist" laws against both

From:
ADL Tightens "Domestic Terrorist" Noose Around Christians

(National Prayer Network) by Rev. Ted Pike --

In attempting to end free speech and criminalize Christians, the Anti-Defamation League (architect of hate laws worldwide) is promoting two contradictory agendas. First, it warns Congress that Islam is highly vulnerable to extreme interpretation by Muslim terrorists. At the same time it derides “Islamophobe” Christians for fearing Islam and Sharia law! ADL characterizes anti-Jihadist evangelicals (even if they are staunchly pro-Israel) as “haters,” whose inflammatory criticism of Islam inspires anti-Islamic terrorists like Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik.

Why ADL's conceptual schizophrenia?

To pass Christian-persecuting “anti-terrorist” laws, ADL must first magnify the threat of Islamic terror. The many instances of Islamic-based violence provide high-octane arguments to persuade Congress to limit freedom. But the agenda of portraying the religious right as a threat to freedom and diversity – arguing that violence-inciting Christians should also be penalized under anti-terrorist laws, must also go forward. Thus, ADL expresses abhorrence at Christian criticism of Islam.

Only by coordinating creation of new legislation spawned by fear of Islam, and at the same time heightening public fear of “Christian” terrorism, does ADL believe it can accomplish sweeping anti-terrorist laws that will envelop both Jihadists and Christians.

ADL, in statements such as the following, recently testified before the Senate Department of Homeland Security, warning that radical Islam is a top security threat.
“Americans motivated by radical interpretations of Islam constitute a growing and increasingly dangerous domestic terror threat. Since the September 11 terrorist attacks, nearly 200 Americans have been charged for their roles in various bomb plots and conspiracies in the U.S., as well as for providing material support to Islamic terrorist groups.

American Muslim extremists fueled by hatred of Jews and Israel have planned a number of terrorist attacks within the U.S.

About one fourth of those arrested since the September 11 attacks have been converts to Islam who embrace the most extreme interpretations of the religion.

The shooting at Fort Hood demonstrates the particular danger posed by so-called "lone wolf" extremists who, though unaffiliated with terrorist groups, share their radical interpretations of Islam and ideological goals

An increasing number of American women motivated by radical interpretations of Islam have been involved in terrorist activity ranging from planning terrorist plots, to raising funds and provided material goods to foreign terrorist organizations.

American Muslim ideologues living abroad are increasingly using their online pulpits to reach and influence audiences in the U.S. with ideologies of extreme intolerance and violence.
Now listen to ADL reverse itself.

Abe Foxman, in yet another warning to the general public of how dangerous Christian/conservative criticism of Islam is, said this past week,
Adherents of this ideological Islamophobia view Islam as an existential threat to the world, especially to the ‘West.’ Moreover, they believe that leaders and governments in the Western world are consciously or unconsciously collaborating to allow Islam to "infiltrate" and eventually conquer democratic societies. Left-wing ‘multiculturalist’ sentiments tear down traditional European culture, they argue, allowing Muslim immigrants to replace it with ‘their own’ culture and values. The result, they claim, will be the demographic, cultural and, eventually, political suicide of the West -- unless action is taken to stop it.
Foxman says the American right is in the throes of anti-Islam hysteria, comparable to emerging early 20th century anti-Semitic (Nazi) movements in Europe! “This belief system goes far beyond anti-Islamic prejudice based on simple religious or racial grounds. In a sense, it parallels the creation of an ideological -- and far more deadly -- form of anti-Semitism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries on the backs of the previously dominant cultural and religious forms of anti-Semitism.”

Such Nazi-like bigotry among evangelicals, Foxman suggests, is proliferating rapidly. He says “many people hold views similar to Breivik's. In the United States, we have seen frequent manifestations of this ideology, including the eager promotion by anti-Islamic zealots of a growing conspiracy theory about "creeping Sharia law." The obvious danger to Americans and Europeans is that, as this movement grows and solidifies, more people may become motivated to violence by this hateful ideology.” (ADL.org, “Norwegian Attacks Stem From a New Ideological Hate”)...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

This article captures several common characteristics and tactics of organized Jewry.

1) Jewry seeks to divide and conquer, and pit different racial, ethnic and religious groups against one another so it can distract from its own malicious crimes and racketeering, and opportunistically exploit conflict between different groups by secretly cutting separate deals and agreements with multiple parties simultaneously.

We see this, for example, in Jewry's simultaneous deal-making and coalition-building with left-wingers, multiculturalists and minority ethnic groups in the Democratic Party, which Jewry dominates, while it is at the same time whispering in the ear of the Christian Right that Jews and Christians must stick together to push the war agenda and "save Israel," and that "God blesses those who bless the Jews."

2) Jewry also seeks to incite domestic conflict and even violence to ratchet up a Big Government police state. Because Judaism doesn't proselytize, due to its Hebrew-supremacist racism, it requires a powerful state to do its bidding, and a highly centralized state is far more conducive to top-down (Jewish) control than is a diffuse state. This is why Jewry has sought to build powerful central governments from Soviet Russia (the Jewish Bolsheviks) to America (the Jewish left-liberals, neocons and Zionists) to Israel (the national socialist Jewish Zionists) and everywhere else it is confident that its "nation within a nation" can gain control of government and then use that government to destroy its rivals and enemies.

This insatiable and relentless drive for a highly centralized, totalitarian government engineered to serve its particularistic interests is what makes Jewry inimical to the traditional Western ideals of equality, liberty and freedom, and a threat to the traditional American form of government -- with its (formerly) strict constitutional limitations, division of powers, and states-rights component -- in particular.

Abe Foxman may seem a self-parody and caricature of the scheming, ear-whispering, double-dealing, well-poisoning Jewish stereotype, but unfortunately he is a common and accurate representation of organized Jewry's character, modus-operandi, and essence going back centuries.

With that in mind, is it any wonder Jewry has been so despised, scorned, and persecuted over the centuries? And really, given that it is their own actions, agenda, and machinations that have brought non-Jewish wrath down upon Jewry's head, is it really "persecution" that describes their plight, or can it be more accurately described as "blowback"?

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Judeofascist-leftie Noam Chomsky conceals his own Jewish supremacist religious doctrine, scapegoats fringe Armageddon Christians for Israeli fascism

(By Chris Moore) -- In the video below, pseudo-"secular" Jewish-leftie Noam Chomsky attempts to portray Judeo-Christian Zionist evangelicals as the driving force behind war in the Middle East by citing fringe Christian religious imperatives for Armageddon, which will allegedly signify the return of Jesus.

True, these superstitious, monomaniacal Christian Zionists play a role, but what about the far more central role of Jewish religious doctrine that their coming Messiah will rule the world from Jerusalem, so Jews are obliged to prepare the way come hell or high water?

What about Jewish religious imperatives that they are a "chosen" Hebrew racial line that is ordained supreme by God and destined to rule over the goyim?

What about Jewish Talmudic religious doctrine that non-Jews are animals, hence Gentiles (particularly those proximate to Israel and in the way of their coming Messiah) can be exterminated?

No, Judeofascist-leftie Noam Chomsky (whose crypto machinations on behalf of his fascist tribe are well documented) will never mention any of that, because he's working the left half of the left-right Judeofascist agenda, which necessitates conflating fringe, warlike, Judaized-"Christian" Zionists (who are actually largely a product of the Scofield bible, which itself is actually a Zionist forgery with Judeo-Masonic origins in London) with the entirety of American Christianity and even Western civilization.

Here's the Judeo-Marxist game plan performed by all manner of Jewish "liberals" in the vein of Noam Chomsky and their gentile useful idiots on the left: Conflate Western civilization with a caricature of Christianity, conflate Christianity with Judeofascist-created, Judeo-Christian Zionist buffoons, overthrow both Western civilization and its Christian component, which pushes the world forward ever more towards One World Government that these Judeofascists of both left and right believe will be ruled by themselves and their coming Messiah out of Jerusalem.

Chomsky infers that what the early Americans did to the various American Indian tribes ending over 100 years ago is comparable and probably worse than what the Israeli Judeofascists are doing to the Palestinians today. By comparing the plight of American Indians who were ethnically cleansed in a whole other epoch (where such viscous tribal warfare and genocide was par for the course, even among themselves) with the contemporary genocidal actions of organized Jewry in Palestine, Chomsky is essentially minimizing his own tribe's crimes.

At his core, Chomsky is just another crypto-racist, Hebrew con artist and Jewish supremacist totalitarian masquerading as a "humanist" concerned with "social justice" and the plight of minorities.

Academic Jewish "liberal" frauds like Chomsky are a dime a dozen in the diaspora, and their "scholarship" is worth even less than that.


In emasculated, post-Western, post-Christian, Judaized-"Christian" U.S., it takes feminists to hound Judeofascist infiltration of Congress

From:
CODEPINK files complaint with Congressional Ethics Committee against AIPAC-funded junkets to Israel

Calls for end to loophole that allows front group to act as conduit for Lobby trips
(Move Over AIPAC!/CODEPINK) -- by Press Release --

The peace group CODEPINK has filed a formal complaint with the Congressional Ethics Committee, calling for an investigation of the junkets to Israel paid for by the powerful Israel lobby AIPAC but channeled through their educational front group, The American Israel Education Foundation (AIEF). This summer recess, a staggering 81 Congresspeople—one out of five members—are participating in these trips.

Download the text of the complaint filed by CODEPINK

According to the House Ethics Rules, Congress is prohibited from participating in any multiple-day trip that is planned, organized, requested, or arranged by a lobbyist. AIPAC skirts the law by funneling the trips through AIEF.

According to the latest publicly available tax returns, in 2009 AIEF did not even have paid staff, relying on AIPAC employees to do its work. AIPAC contributed more than $3.2 million of employee salaries to cover the staff costs of AIEF in 2009. In other words, a 501(c)(4) organization with registered lobbyists is paying for the staff of a 501(c)(3) organization to run congressional delegations that cannot legally be funded by an organization that employs registered lobbyists.

“AIPAC barely tries to hide that fact that AIEF is a front group,” says CODEPINK cofounder Medea Benjamin, who filed the complaint. “The groups are housed in the same offices, have overlapping boards of directors, share staff, employ the same Chief Financial Officer and are constantly moving funds from one entity to another. It’s time for Congress to put an end to this charade by closing the AIPAC loophole.”

Craig Holman, a government affairs lobbyist at Public Citizen who helped draft federal lobbying and ethics reform legislation signed into law in 2007, agrees. “The House ethic rules do not allow a non-profit group like AIEF, which is controlled and directed by the lobby group AIPAC, to pay for travel junkets for members of Congress. This AIPAC loophole is rendering the travel rules meaningless and should be stopped,” says Holman.

“With constituents facing severe economic hardships, Representatives should be home in their districts during this August recess to tell voters how they will dig us out the mess they’ve created,” says Josh Ruebner, the national advocacy director at the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation. “Instead many of them are spending part of their recess in Israel on a lobbyist-funded trip, being pressured into even more tax-payer-funded weapons for the Israeli military, weapons used to commit human rights abuses against Palestinians.”

CODEPINK, which organizes citizen diplomacy delegations to Israel and Palestine, including Gaza, believes these AIPAC trips give the participants a skewed view that hides the oppressive nature of the Israeli government. “The trips are designed to push the U.S. Congress into supporting AIPAC policies of unconditional support for the Israel government, such as continuing to give $3 billion of our taxdollars to Israel and vetoing the upcoming Palestinian call for statehood at the UN,” said Benjamin. “AIPAC puts the interests of Israel before U.S. interests, which makes these Congressional junkets dangerous and downright un-American.”...LINK

Monday, August 15, 2011

"Liberal" fraud Jewry posed as indignant and outraged by apartheid S. Africa even as it did deals with it on the side

From:
A Deal with the Devil: The Strange Case of Israel and South Africa

(The Occidental Observer) -- by Sam Davidson --

...Most Jews found South African “White supremacy” inherently distasteful. As a result, in 1961 when the South African Foreign Minister defended apartheid in front of the U.N., Israel was one of only two “Western” states to support his censure. Months later the Israelis again supported an initiative for diplomatic sanctions against South Africa while the United States, Great Britain, and other Western nations remained opposed. South Africa retaliated in 1963 by pressuring its own Jewish community, going so far as to the ban the transfer of gift funds to Israel. (South African Jews had, until this point, been one of the highest sources of per captia donations to Israel in the world.) The South African government considered severing relations with Israel but held back due to fear of foreign repercussions. The Israelis eventually recalled their own ambassador in September of that year (p. 38).

How then did South Africa and Israel eventually form an “alliance?”

The Six-Day War and the resulting conflicts polarized world opinion of Israel. France, which had hitherto been a source of “intense, if secretive, military cooperation”, began to cool relations with Israel (p. 36). Likewise, many of the relationships that Israel had cultivated with African and other third-world states simply disintegrated. Of the 32 Israeli technical and trade missions in Africa, only 4 remained following the Yom Kippur War. Likewise, the conflict had left the Israeli economy “in shambles” according to Polakow-Suransky (p. 76). The Israeli solution was to build a massive arms export industry.

Like Israel, South Africa was facing an increasingly polarized world opinion. Its stability was undermined both by internal disturbances and the destabilization of neighboring regimes. Politically its options were limited but economically it still possessed significant assets. For example, South Africa possessed 86% of the total world reserves of platinum group metals. It also possessed 83% of the world’s reserves of chrome ore, 49% of gold reserves, and 17% of uranium reserves.

South Africa faced a security threat. Israel faced an economic threat. The solution for both was to develop extensive yet highly secretive military cooperation. Between 1973 and 1981 the Israeli arms export industry increased from $70 million to nearly $1 billion (p. 77). By 1979 South Africa had become Israel’s largest arms client, accounting for 35% of their military exports (p. 132). These deals included tank engines, aircraft, and nuclear technology.

Yet the Israelis, like most Jews, generally condemned South African apartheid. In judging their relationship with South Africa the Israelis seemed to be asking the old question, “Is it good for the Jews?” Perhaps the best answer was articulated by an Auschwitz survivor: “We will make agreements with the devil to save Jews from persecution and to secure the future of this state ” (p. 91). But such agreements require a certain amount of discretion. Because, you know, not everyone approves of making deals with the devil. As one Israeli editor advised a South African, “You are faced with a hypocritical world. … The trend is to sound liberal. To be liberal is to be nice. … But make the world believe you are sincere. You have to be hypocritical to survive.” (p162)...MORE...LINK
-----------------------

Chris Moore comments:

The hypocritical chutzpah of the Jewish Zionists — secretly selling arms to S. Africa even as they publicly condemn its apartheid; passing judgment on relatively moderate S. Africa apartheid even as Israel ethnically cleanses the Palestinians; adopting self-righteous and self-serving liberal poses even as Israel engages in naked fascism, which is subsequently whitewashed by international Jewry’s media power.

In fact, the rank, Jewish supremacist hypocrisy at this point is so appallingly blatant and noxious in both Israel and the Jewish Zionist diaspora that that it threatens to topple all of those who have sustained them and participated in their racket for all these decades, from the pseudo-secular Marxist left through mainstream left-liberalism and multi-culturalism through the neocon Right.

So many of these corrupted institutions are so dirtied by their relationship with Zionist Jewry that it is clearly the linchpin to toppling the lot, and if they can’t all be brought down together, all of them will sooner or later collapse from the dry rot.

It’s only a matter of time, and how much damage they can do to the West between now and then.

***

Sam Davidson: In judging their relationship with South Africa the Israelis seemed to be asking the old question, “Is it good for the Jews?”

A commenter at this article's home at Occidental Observer made the following comparison:
It reminds me a little bit of the attitude taken by many Jewish Zionists toward Christian Zionists. In the discourse, the Jewish Zionists are treated as demeaning themselves in partnering with the Christian Zionists, although they accept the latter’s support all the same. The Jewish Zionists are presented as being on a higher moral ground than the “nutjob” or “genocidal” (this characteristic is taken from their supposed End Times beliefs) or “stupid” Christians. The Christian Zionists are always the “devil” in that deal.

Not that I approve of Christian Zionist policy toward the United States and Israel. I’m just not certain they deserve to be treated as lesser, or less moral, human beings than Jewish Zionists.

This is all, of course, residue from the anti-White narrative.
This is an important point. The liberal intelligentsia's zeitgeist is pretty much dictated by Jewry, hence the gross spectacle of mainstream media sneering at evangelical "nutters" on the one hand, while warmly embracing, celebrating and glorifying the even more nutso and pathological Jewish Zionists.

Judeo-Christian Zionists and Jewish Zionists should by rights be sneered at equally, and actually the more potent, warlike and dangerous of the two, the Jewish Zionists, deserve the higher degree of sneering contempt.

But because diaspora Jewry essentially owns the establishment left, this doesn't happen -- even as Jewry's phony liberal mask slips lower and lower, and it is more and more exposed as the Judeofascist creature it truly is.

This outright fraud by the entire liberal fascist establishment and its Judeofascist string-pullers will hopefully sooner or later occur even to slow-witted evangelicals.

Jewry, as always, is publicly knifing these dimwits in the back even as, on the subject of Israel and Zionism, it is slipping into the back room with them and pleading how they all have "shared values," and "aren't these anti-Israel liberal nihilists truly horrible people?"

Additionally, perhaps even dimwitted liberals who are earnest in their liberalism will catch on to double-dealing Jewry.

But do either have the integrity, character, and enough of a principled core to form enough of a critical mass in their respective movements and confront Jewry on its psychotically cynical opportunism, double dealing and hypocrisy?

Probably not. So many liberals and eveangelicals already sold their souls to get into bed with Jewry and its lucrative, murderous rackets decades ago.