Monday, October 31, 2011

Zionist agent inside British government and his proxy "outed" in warmongering scandal against Iran under backdrop of their own bedroom escapades

From:
British Scandal Linked to Pro-Israel Groups
Resignation of Defense Secretary Linked to Shadowy Pal's Trips
(Forward) -- by Kevin O'Sullivan --

London — The scandal that led to the recent resignation of Britain’s high-powered defense minister has laid bare a seamy underside to the funding and influencing of politicians in the United Kingdom, and the donors of some of the country’s key pro-Israel groups appear to be near the center of the affair.

Liam Fox, who resigned his defense post October 14, has been forced to explain the nature of his relationship with Adam Werritty, a longtime personal friend, after it was revealed that Werritty had been traveling abroad while representing himself as an official emissary of the defense minister with Fox’s knowledge. Werritty’s travels included forays to Iran, where he reportedly met with opposition activists, and to Israel, where he is said to have met with Israeli intelligence agents, including the director of the Mossad.

With no official position, Werritty could not pay for his travels via the government. In fact, his travel was funded by a nongovernmental organization he established in which three of the six principal donors are linked to pro-Israel organizations.

Despite the revelations to date, Dermot Kehoe, director of public affairs and media for the Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre, or BICOM, a major pro-Israel public relations and lobbying group, said Jewish interest groups are unlikely to suffer lasting damage.

“It hasn’t been very helpful, but I wouldn’t overstate the importance of what happened,” Kehoe said. “Inevitably, any talk around pro-Israel lobbying tends to throw up a whiff of conspiracy which unfortunately helps reinforce the negative stereotypes [of the Jewish community].”

In the United States, the pro-Israel lobby is large and vocal, and wields considerable influence in the national body politic. It also operates fairly openly and has been subject to frequent scrutiny. But across the Atlantic, Jewish interest groups have traditionally operated far more quietly and have been subjected to much less examination.

The bright light now being shone on the Fox resignation may change that state of affairs. Fox officially quit his post because he allowed Werritty, his close friend, to pursue his own business interests at the heart of government without an official role. Werritty, who was also best man at Fox’s wedding, went into hiding amid lurid headlines about the exact nature of the relationship between the two men.

It was a clear breach of the ministerial code of conduct, and Fox, a Conservative Party right-winger who was once regarded as a leadership rival to Prime Minister David Cameron, had to go.

Now the focus has shifted to Pargav, the not-for-profit organization that Werritty set up to fund his travels on Fox’s behalf. Among its major donors is Mick Davis, chair of the board of trustees of the Jewish Leadership Council and chairman of the United Jewish Israel Appeal. Davis, 52, is also chief executive of the mining company Xstrata, listed in the top 100 companies on the London Stock Exchange, with a market value of about $65 billion.

The millionaire businessman has declined to go into detail about why he decided to donate money to Pargav. But he has also paid about $240,000 to the Conservative Party and $12,000 to Education Minister Michael Gove, another staunchly pro-Israel Cabinet minister.

The second donor, Chaim ‘Poju’ Zabludowicz, is a flamboyant ex-arms dealer who contributed slightly less than $5,000 through his investment firm, Tamares. The London-based billionaire, who counts Madonna as a close friend, is also a key figure in BICOM, which is regarded roughly as the trans-Atlantic equivalent of Washington’s American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

The third notable donor is financier Michael Lewis, a former BICOM deputy chairman who gave $47,000 to Pargav.

All three men — who are understood to be close friends — have since distanced themselves from Werritty. But the fact remains that their money helped fund, at least in part, some of his 18 trips abroad on Fox’s coattails since 2009. In total, Werritty was present at about 40 of Fox’s 70 recorded engagements, domestic or otherwise, while Fox was in office...MORE...LINK

How self-enriching Jewry and its collaborators infiltrated and overthrew U.S. economic institutions, to the point of near national bankruptcy today

Introduction by Chris Moore:

In the video below, Brother Nathanael Kapner takes us through Jewry's slow insinuation, infiltration, and overthrow of the economic levers of America over the last several decades, to the point where we're at today: on the cusp of bankruptcy and impoverishment, even as organized Jewry is itself wealthier than ever.

Following World War II, and later, the end of the Cold War, America was in the cat-bird seat the world over. We could have worked towards being a benevolent Empire that pursued the highest Christian and Western ethics, ideals, philosophies and morality.

Instead, our “leaders” and “elites” sold their souls, sold out the country, and allowed Zionist Jewry, the most notorious nation-wreckers in the history of mankind, (a group that’s been expelled over 100 times in its ignoble history) to infiltrate and dominate the highest institutions in America. Worse, much of the country itself happily injected the money-worshipping, materialistic opium and licentiousness being sold by Jewry, and in a pathetic, narcotic state, told itself turning control over to Jewry “doesn’t really matter” (as if “exceptional” America was somehow immune to the laws of God and history that instructed us Jewry is rotten to the core, insatiable, and completely treasonous by way of 109 historical expulsions).

In addition to Zionist Jewry, I spit upon the generation of willing accomplices, lackeys, stooges and dupes that sold their souls and sold out the country to the Jews.

May the lot rot in hell forever.


-----
From:
While The Euro & Dollar Die

(RealZionistNews.com) -- by Brother Nathanael Kapner --

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Continental leftists increasingly serious about flogging self-serving, fraudulently "left-wing," Jewish crypto-Zionists from their movement

Introduction by Chris Moore:

The following is more on the increasingly nasty and serious dustup on the left between crypto-Zionists and authentic left-wingers.

I originally followed the link to this article from Gilad Atzmon’s blog, where he made a brief comment. The article revolves around a review of Atzmon’s new book by Red Scribblings, one that “left-wing,” crypto-Zionist Tony Greenstein apparently found objectionable. The article also discusses Jewish anti-Zionist Israel Shamir, who himself submits a comment following the article, as does Greenstein.

While reading the article, keep in mind that there are two types of Jewish nationalism: Israeli Jewish nationalism, and Diaspora virtual Jewish nationalism. Both are equally racist, self-serving, and insidious; the only difference is that Jewish Zionist Israelis are more honest and open about their own chauvinistic character, whereas the Diaspora virtual Jewish nationalists often adopt affectations of liberalism or universal leftism as a smokescreen to cover over their chauvenism, and then, just as do Israeli Zionists, insist on smearing those who “out” their fascist essence as racists.

Greenstein is upset because, thanks to people like Shamir and Atzmon, more and more on the left are seeing “left-wing” Diaspora virtual Jewish nationalists for the self-serving frauds and saboteurs they are.

But the writing is on the wall: the crypto-Zionist, Diaspora virtual Jewish nationalists are finished on the left; they’re just having a really hard time coming to terms with the fact that their scam is up, yet again.

UPDATE:

Redscribe, the author of the post in question, just responded to my comments and others' in a reply below the article (scroll down to the bottom of the following linked article to read it).

I responded to Redscribe's comments as follows (hopefully the reply will get out of modertation):

You have no knowledge of my ideology, which you conveniently dismiss as "conspiracy theory," thus no basis to impugn my motives.

The Levant Zionist issue can no longer be compartmentalized from the Diaspora Zionist and crypto-Zionist issue; insisting on doing so is a de facto endorsement of Diaspora Zionism, the primary lobby, underwriter and enabler of Levant Zionism.

There's an increasingly relevant slogan that Zionist-enablers, dupes and lackeys, left to right, can no longer ignore: “The Palestinians won’t gain their freedom from Zionism until the Americans do.”

I’ve added my own addendum: What’s the difference between an average Palestinian and an average American? About ten years.

We’re all Palestinians now, except those who place themselves in the Zionist camp volitionally, or by default, or whose own ideology is unwilling to acknowledge the continuity between Levant Zionism, Diaspora Zionism, and Diaspora virtual Jewish nationalism, and thus twists itself into hypocritical and intellectually incoherent double standards to get out of doing so.


--------------------------

From:
From Atzmon to Dreyfus: a reply to communalists and Stalinists

(By Red Scribblings) --

Tony Greenstein’s extended comment criticising my review of Gilad Atzmon’s new book The Wandering Who is indicative of a political method that can only lead to a ‘dialogue of the deaf’. It is a characteristic flaw of the fragmented far left that in political disputes someone is quoted out of context in such a way as to distort the meaning of their views, and a whole extended narrative is concocted to attack the falsified or caricatured version. This is not a good method, it not only actually leaves one’s interlocutor’s real views untouched, but it also makes the exchange impossible to follow to the uninitiated layperson.

Such practices make the left a laughing stock. In this case, however, there is an additional element of communalism in that Atzmon is being ‘punished’ by left-wing members of his own Jewish community not merely for being right or wrong about something, but also for speaking ‘against’ his own people. The peculiar ferocity of the attack not only on Atzmon, but also on anyone who disagrees with these people’s most extreme characterisations, is shown by the contribution of another Jewish leftist, Evildoer, who baldly admits he does not seek a rational discussion at all with leftists who disagree with him about Atzmon.

Be that as it may, this odd method is shown by Greenstein’s own initial comment that Atzmon’s alleged anti-semitism is ‘largely ignored’ in my review. He must have been reading a completely different piece of writing, since the main subject of the review from beginning to end is the controversy about Atzmon’s alleged anti-semitism. But Tony Greenstein is not illiterate, this is rather communal-speak for ‘he does not think that Atzmon is a racist’. In other words, ‘largely ignored’ is a dishonest code for ‘I don’t agree with the way this has been addressed’. But instead of saying, as a normal discourse would, “ you have drawn this conclusion, but you are wrong – here is why…” and proceeding to give some reasons, he pretends that the question has been ignored and proceeds to give a long spiel on that basis. Which is simply like firing blanks.

Greenstein pretends that I did not address Atzmon’s putative holocaust denial, but of course I did and proceeded to the conclusion that while he undoubtedly has doubts about the truth of the holocaust or aspects of it, he has not taken a definitive position. I also gave reasons, taken from the Israeli context, why someone reacting against the racist crimes of their own state, not decades before their birth but right in front of their eyes, might mistakenly but comprehensibly develop such doubts or even disbelief when a narrative about historical crimes is used to justify racist crimes in the here and now.

Greenstein rattles off a list of Jews who have made this very error and pretends that I did not address this question (when actually I called it a ‘monumental blunder’). Again what he really objects to is the conclusions I drew about those who have made this kind of error. That they are generally misguided opponents of Israel racism. This is not the same as not addressing it.

And on one point of detail, outside the subject of my review, Greenstein accuses the Russian/Swedish/Israeli Jewish journalist Israel Shamir of being a fully paid-up fascist. In fact his views are an odious form of Stalinism; he certainly does favour alliances with racists and nationalists, with the Machiavellian and grossly unprincipled aim of manipulating the supporters of one form of far right politics to supposedly neutralise another form – the Western-backed free-market form. This is the Red-Brown block that many Stalinist nostalgics are involved in in Russia at the moment.

This is a reactionary fantasy; the most degenerate form of popular frontism, quite in tune with previous examples of such alliances with one reactionary force against a ‘greater evil’ in the history of Stalinism like Stalin’s ‘rehabilitation’ of the anti-semitic Russian Orthodox Church during the ‘Great Patriotic War’ against Hitler. For ‘Hitler’ Shamir, embracing both Stalin and the church, substitutes the Zionists and West. Stalin’s rehabilitation of the church led to such events as the post-war anti-semitic ‘Doctors Plot’ and anti-Jewish purges in Eastern Europe, so it is hardly surprising that someone who embraces a similar idea today would end up sounding pretty rancid.

On the other hand, he might well strike a chord with some Jews repelled by Israel’s repeated massacres of Palestinians, justified repeatedly by reference to the need for Israeli ‘security’ against the threat of another holocaust. Shamir is just one of many voices in the Middle East region who speak out against Israeli crimes using a discourse tinged with hostility to Jews – amalgamating Zionism, being Jewish and Judaism as a religion. The only thing that makes him a bit different is that he is himself Jewish.

Shamir is undoubtedly a deeply alienated character who, however has a common origin with other Jewish/Israeli ‘self-haters’ and some authority because of his long-standing support for the Palestinians. Objectionable many of his views may be, but as a Stalinist, he still has one foot in the workers movement and his influence over some dissident Jewish circles arguably derives from that. He, and those influenced by him, still have to be dealt with by means of debate according to the norms of the labour movement.

Essentialist

Greenstein produces no evidence for his claim that Atzmon’s view of Jews is ‘an essentialist view based on a racist outlook’. None whatsoever – all he can do is misquote Atzmon in a particularly silly way. On his own blog, Greenstein’s co-thinker Brian Robinson admitted misquoting Atzmon in this way, his clear statements that he did not consider Jews to be an ethnic group or ‘race’ at all being twisted to say the exact opposite. In Robinson’s case, he at least acknowledged that he had made a mistake, but Greenstein would hear nothing of it, saying “I have no doubt he [sees Jews as a race – RS] – however he defines it”. No evidence of this, but much to the contrary...MORE...LINK

Anti-American, racist anti-Gentile Jewish Defense League reveals what Diaspora Zionist Jewry really thinks about American melting pot and non-Jews

From:
Assimilation & Intermarriage

Among the Biggest Threats to Jewish Survival
(By Jewish Defense League) --

There is perhaps no greater threat to the well-being of Am Yisrael, the Jewish nation, than assimilation and its all too natural consequence, intermarriage. The Jewish Defense League seeks to combat not only the multifarious physical and spiritual forms of Jew-hatred but also the spiritual malaise of Jewish indifference and ignorance, and the threat of Jewish affection for the non-Jew.

As if we face too few external threats, an alarming number of Jews willingly flee from Judaism into melting pots, secular "culture" and morality, and often most devastatingly the arms of non-Jewish spouses. The unfortunate reality of the situation is that assimilation and intermarriage have done more to destroy Jewish souls than most every form of persecution and act of genocide we have suffered as a people throughout time immemorial.

Only through Jewish pride and education will Jews be protected from these insidious, corrupting forces. While we believe with eternal faith that Ha-Shem's chosen people will ultimately be saved from all perils and dwell securely in our land, until those prophecies are fulfilled we exist in a troubled world, and we must therefore guard ourselves against these veiled dangers. The future of our children, and our children's children, depend on whether we choose the Torah and life (since the Torah is called by G-d the Tree of Life for the Jew), or assimilation, intermarriage and death...MORE...LINK

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Even the most "liberal" wing of religious U.S. Jewry, Reform, is hard fascist when it comes to Zionist interests--whether at home or in Levant

From:
Jewish Double Standards and Hypocrisy Department: Reform Jews Get on the Far Right Bandwagon

(OccidentalObserver.net) -- by Kevin MacDonald --

But remain staunchly on the left in the U.S. Mondoweiss reports on a major conference of the Union for Reform Judaism:
But Natan Sharansky? Sharansky is a rightwing Israeli leader who chairs One Jerusalem, which has worked to kill the two-state solution, supposedly precious to liberal Jews. And Bill Kristol– WTF! Kristol is the neoconservative leader who pushed the Iraq war, writing that “Israel’s fight against terrorism is our fight.” Kristol has backed Israeli colonies through the West Bank.

This demonstrates the conservatism of even Reform Jews when it comes to Israel. Reform Jewish leader Eric Yoffie attacked Richard Goldstone months after the Gaza horror. Reform Jewish leader Rabbi David Saperstein criticized J Street for taking a fairly mild stand against settlements. And J Street has pulled back its criticisms of Israel because it has pitched its tent inside the Jewish community and the Jewish community is reactionary on the Israel question. So it follows that at a time when Israel is losing credibility around the world, Reform circles the wagons, and welcomes rightwingers.
So President Obama (another headliner guest at the conference) is sharing the floor far right Jewish ethnonationalists. Forgive me for being cynical when we hear the constant refrain that the reason that Jews are on the left is because of “Jewish values” of tolerance and social justice. This is just another example of a repeated theme here, that Jewish ethics is fundamentally about what is good for the Jews. The Jewish culture of the left in the U.S. is ethnic warfare against the traditional people and culture of America, while Jewish attitudes about Israel justify ethnic warfare against the Palestinians—including tolerance of ethnic cleansing and apartheid. Jewish values as ethnic warfare...MORE...LINK

Friday, October 28, 2011

Jewish lobby demands pledge of allegiance to Israel even though both parties already fight to be top in Israel-first loyalties

From:
Anti-Defamation League National Pledge for Unity on Israel

(SteveLendmanBlog) -- by Stephen Lendman --

...For decades, Washington's been Israel's paymaster/partner. Together they waged aggressive wars and state terror against nonbelligerent countries, organizations and individuals.

Both are unrivaled global menaces. They're scourges on humanity. Annually, Washington grants Israel billions of taxpayer dollars, low or no-interest loans (some never repaid), the latest weapons and technologies, and other benefits afforded no other nation.

Israel, in fact, gets more US aid than all other countries combined. In return, they partner in crimes of war and against humanity. Neither respects democratic values, human and civil rights, or rule of law principles. Both are unprincipled rogue states.

ADL and other Israel Lobby members pressure administrations and congressional members to provide uncompromising support. Few decline. Now ADL wants more, saying:

"Now is the time to reaffirm that Israel's well-being is best served, as it has always been, by American voices raised together in unshakeable support for our friend and ally."

ADL's October 19 press release headlined, "ADL and AJC Co-Sponsor National Pledge Calling for Bipartisan Consensus on Israel, saying:

Both organizations want "elected officials, religious leaders, community groups and individuals to join them in signing the ‘National Pledge for Unity on Israel.’ “

According to AJC executive director David Harris:

"If there is one thing candidates for high office and people of all political stripes can agree on, it is the importance of the long tradition of bipartisan support for our friend and ally, Israel."

ADL national director Foxman said:

"The last thing America and Israel need right now is the distractions of having Israel bandied about as a tool for waging political attacks."

Foxman sounds worried about what rarely happens. He underscored his appeal by saying individual and organizational signatories will be published. The implication, of course, indicates names omitted fall short of total support.

He added:

"(W)e want the discourse on US support for Israel to avoid the sometimes polarizing debates and political attacks that have emerged in recent weeks, as candidates have challenged their opponents' pro-Israel bona fides or questioned the current administration's foreign policy approach vis-a-vis Israel."

Imagine one nation asking others to pledge loyalty as an expression of support. The notion's foreign, unheard of, and arrogant. Few at best would go along, doing so only under heavy pressure or threats...

In fact, it never did before so why now? Few congressional members do less. Critics are targeted for removal. Israeli Lobby power is ruthless. Few officeholders and aspirants oppose it. What Israel wants, it gets.

Political support for Israel isn't overwhelming. It's nearly unanimous. The tradition goes back decades, especially since the 1960s.

In days, Jewish activists, organizations, and congressional members will receive ADL's pledge by mail. Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) executive director Matt Brooks expressed ire, saying:

"This effort to stifle debate on US policy toward Israel runs counter to this American tradition. Accordingly, the RJC will not be silenced on this or any issue."

He stopped short of admitting strong Republican support for Israel, no matter his strong rhetoric.

At the same time, he added:

"An open and vigorous debate on the questions confronting our country is the cornerstone of the American electoral process....For this reason, the RJC will not be a signer to this pledge."

The Emergency Committee for Israel also was blunt, saying:

"You must be kidding." It promised that "this attempt to silence those of us who have questioned the current administration's foreign policy approach vis-a-vis Israel will reenergize us."

"Directors Harris and Foxman need a refresher course on the virtues of free speech and robust debate in a democracy. Their effort to stifle discussion and debate is unworthy of the best traditions of America, and of Israel."

At issue, of course, is proving who's Israel's staunchest ally, even though both parties have little disagreement on matters concerning Israel. But they want voters to think one side is more loyal than the other, using rhetoric only to convince them.

Nonetheless, Foxman responded, saying:

The pledge wants to encourage "measured and thoughtful expressions of different points of view regarding US policy toward Israel. What prompted ADL and AJC to launch this initiative was a desire to ask participants in the political discourse to avoid harsh and personal rhetoric or tactics in the form of attacks on political opponents' positions on Israel."

In fact, what ADL, AJL, AIPAC, and other Israel Lobby members demand is assurance that whatever Israel wants it gets. Hasn't it nearly always been that way?

Haven't targets of both countries suffered enough from it? Isn't it high political Washington acted responsibly?

One day perhaps if America's corrupted duopoly is replaced by officials representing popular, not imperial and corporate, interests. It can't happen a moment too soon...MORE...LINK

Apocalyptic, right-wing Judeo-Christian Zionists, fanatical U.S. Jewish Zionists not-so-strange bedfellows in attacks on Christians, Palestinians

From:
Farah Calls Ted Pike a Lying Anti-Semite (Oct 2011)

(YouTube.com) -- by npnfilmmaker --

Bolshevik-style tyranny penetrates America: Teacher fired for claiming Zionists control Fed, yet facts show she is correct

From:
Do Zionists Control Wall Street? The Shocking Facts!

(YouTube.com) -- by drdduke --

Israeli gangsterism infiltrates U.S. health care? Profiteering Zionist organ dealer claims secret network in prestigious American hospitals

From:
NY organ trafficker admits buying kidneys in Israel for $10,000... and selling them in U.S. for $120,000

(By Daily Mail Reporter)

Lawyers for a man who pleaded guilty Thursday in the first ever federal conviction for illegal organ trafficking say he was performing life-saving services for severely ill people.

Levy Izhak Rosenbaum, from New York, admitted in a Trenton federal court to brokering three illegal kidney transplants for desperate New Jersey-based customers in exchange for payments of $120,000 or more.
He also pleaded guilty to a conspiracy count for brokering an illegal kidney sale.

Attorneys Ronald Kleinberg and Richard Finkel say Rosenbaum never solicited clients.
He simply agreed to help desperately ill people by finding them kidney donors, they said.

The lawyers claim the surgeries occurred in prestigious American hospitals and were performed by experienced transplant experts.

They did not, however, name the hospitals involved, the Associated Press reports...LINK

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Is controversial new book again flushing Diaspora Zionist Jewry out of left camp and into neocon right where it naturally belongs?

Introduction by Chris Moore:

Let me get something straight off of the bat: left-wingers are in no way morally superior to right wingers, and the only difference between Marxists/communists/Bolsheviks and traditional fascists is that the fascists have been held accountable for their mass murder and crimes against humanity, whereas the leftists have essentially been given a "pass."

That said, it's always been clear to me that even though organized Jewry in many ways invented and instigated modern leftism through Marxism and Bolshevism, as an essentially self-serving, insatiably greedy, crypto-racist subset, it never really belonged on the more egalitarian and slightly less racist left, but rather was a creature with a fascist essence (mirrored by Hitler and Nazism) that merely sought to use "social justice" and "humanism" and "human rights" rhetoric, along with millions of attendant left-wing Gentile useful idiots, as camouflage to pursue its particularistic Judeofascist interests (as opposed to the theoretical universalism of leftism).

This is one reason why the Soviet left ended up turning against "Zionist" Jewry and driving much of it out of the Soviet block (or allowed it to freely emigrate to Israel or the West at the behest of Western liberals like long-time Democratic Senator Scoop Jackson).

And of course, once safely ensconced within Western left-liberalism, it didn't take highly cohesive, highly networked organized Jewry long to ratchet its way to the top of the Democratic Party, which today it dominates.

But as the Soviets discovered, the Judeofascists can only conceal their self-serving, fascist character and essence for so long, and with the Jewish neocons (who started out, appropriately enough, under Scoop Jackson's wing), they again began to show their true colors (most notably by way of endless warmongering on behalf of Israeli and fascist Zionist interests) to the point that today, even corrupt, gullible, delusional liberals are figuring out that they're fascists, and that Zionism is the Jewish-led Trojan horse for neo-fascism.

Read the following article on the reaction to Gilad Atzmon's new book from the Jerusalem Post with an eye on this reality, and you will understand why organized Jewry is in an absolute panic over the increasingly mainstream embrace of Atzmon's work; it all has to do with Jewry being "outed" as pseudo-liberal and fraudulently universal in its character, and worse...being outed as quite fascist in its self-serving, Zionist essence.

This is causing an earthquake in the liberal camp, and is what all of this angry talk of renewed, Soviet style anti-Semitism from Atzmon and others on the left in the article below, and accusations of anti-Semitism within the Occupy movement, are really (at least in part) about: Judeofascists deeply angry, upset and flustered that their decades-long dupes -- Western Gentile liberals -- are finally figuring out that the murderous Zionist swindle has taken the left for a ride...yet again.

-------------------------

From:
US academics challenged over praise of 'anti-Semitic' book

‘The Wandering Who’ by 'anti-Semitic' London-based musician hailed by US academics John Mearsheimer and Richard Falk.
(Jerusalem Post) -- by Jonny Paul, correspondent --

LONDON – Uproar has broken out since American academics John Mearsheimer and Richard Falk have endorsed a new book by a London-based Israeli musician accused of being an anti-Semite and Holocaust denier.

Chicago University professor John Mearsheimer, author of the 2007 book The Israel Lobby, and Princeton professor Richard Falk, the UN rapporteur for the Palestinian territories, gave promotional words for a book written by Gilad Atzmon.

His book, titled The Wandering Who, has been described as contemporary cultural racism and as an attack on Jewish identity inspired by Soviet anti- Semitism, by analysts and experts.

Renowned American law professor Alan Dershowitz said the book has crossed the line from anti-Zionism to anti-Semitism and said their endorsement was something he has not seen in his lifetime.

“I challenge Mearsheimer and Falk to a debate on whether they have endorsed an anti-Semitic book,” he told The Jerusalem Post on Friday. He said he plans to expose their action widely, both in the academy and elsewhere.

“Atzmon has adopted all the classical definitions of anti- Semitism, he uses the same tropes borrowed from Protocols of the Elders of Zion and other Nazi publications – that Jews control the world, are responsible for the credit crunch, believe Hitler was right,” he told the Post.

“[Mearsheimer and Falk] have crossed a red line that has never been crossed in my lifetime," Dershowitz said.

Abraham H. Foxman, National Director of the Anti- Defamation League, said the endorsement reveals what he knew, that Mearsheimer is an anti-Semite.

“With his glowing endorsement of a book by a known Hitler apologist and Holocaust denier, John Mearsheimer has revealed himself to be an anti- Semite,” he said. “For years, Mearsheimer paraded as an objective analyst, professor and critic, and for years we were very careful not to label him as an anti-Semite. Now he has clearly aligned himself with the worst kind of anti-Semitism.

“Gilad Atzmon is a well-known anti-Semite and a promoter of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and perverse historical distortions of the Holocaust.

He is a fringe character who has suddenly gained greater attention because of the Mearsheimer endorsement of his book,” Foxman added.

Mark Gardner, director of communications for the Community Security Trust, a charity that monitors and records anti- Semitic incidents in the UK, said the book represents utterly contemporary cultural racism.

“Practically every page is adorned with disgusting quotes, as reflected in a chapter titled ‘Swindler’s List,’” he said.

Gardner said the promotional words from Falk and Mearsheimer “elevates a fanatical crank to literary status.”

“Mearshemier’s quote is an especially repulsive, as it accuses ‘Jewish leaders’ of Zionism, described as “blind loyalty to Israel,” and scaremongering, described as “the threat of another Holocaust,” he said.

“Atzmon’s hatred is one thing, but for a Chicago University professor to echo it with such grotesque misrepresentations of Jewish behavior, is something else entirely,” Gardner said. “The book advertiser wants all of the profit and none of the moral responsibility.”

British but New York-based journalist and blogger Ben Cohen said the book was clearly inspired by Soviet anti-Semitism.

“When Atzmon traffics in anti-Semitic tropes – for example describing the ‘credit crunch’ as a ‘Ziopunch,’ or declaring that The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is an accurate reflection of the global power of American Jews – he radiates the delight of someone liberated from a huge emotional burden,” he said in an article in this week’s New YorkJewish Week.

Responding to Mearsheimer, Cohen said it cannot be left for others to determine what constitutes hatred of the Jews.

“The term ‘anti-Semitism’ was coined by anti-Semites in 19th century Germany. It’s a word that’s never been owned by the Jewish community. That has to change – we cannot allow Mearsheimer and those like him to determine what does and what does not constitute hatred of Jews,” Cohen said.

Described by its publishers, Zero Books, as “An investigation of Jewish identity politics and contemporary Jewish ideology,” a note was placed on its website defending the backlash against the book.

“[The book is] more articulate and far more authoritative than anything I could say. I haven’t seen anything since to persuade me that we are deluded or anti-Semitic in publishing this book. In the light of this, I think it would be reprehensible to cancel publication because authors were threatening to leave us. That would really make us guilty of what we’re already being accused of by some; ‘you’re only publishing for the money,’” the statement read.

“So we’ll take the heat, whether it’s [oddly enough] from the far left or neo-con right.”...LINK

Sympathy for Arab resistance, you’re fired, but when mainstream media Zionists call for genocide against Palestinians, not a word from media bosses

From:
Washington Post's Jennifer Rubin promotes call for Palestinian genocide

(alakhbar) -- by Max Blumenthal --

Correction: I initially reported that Jennifer Rubin deleted her retweet of Rachel Abrams' screed. It turns out she did not.

In a blog post cheering the release of the captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, neoconservative activist Rachel Decter Abrams descended into a twisted call for genocide, calling for Israel to throw released Palestinian prisoners whom she described as "child sacrificing savages" and "unmanned animals" -- along with "their offspring" -- "into the sea, to float there, food for sharks."

Abrams is the half-sister of Commentary editor John Podhoretz, the wife of Iran-Contra felon and former Assistant Secretary of State Elliot Abrams, and the daughter of Midge Decter and step daughter of neocon founding father Norman Podhoretz. She is also a board member of the right-wing Emergency Committee for Israel, which recently produced baseless ads claiming the Occupy Wall Street movement is anti-Semitic.

The Washington Post's neoconservative "Right Turn" blogger Jennifer Rubin is one of Abrams' closest allies in the media. As soon as Abrams tweeted out a link to her exterminationist blog post, Rubin -- whose Twitter account is "JRubinBlogger" -- retweeted it to her followers, clearly approving of its content...

In July 2010, the veteran CNN correspondent Octavia Nasr was fired for writing on Twitter that she was "sad" to hear of the death of Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah, a figure instrumental in the foundation of Hezbollah whom she said she "respect[ed] a lot." Despite apologizing and explaining that she merely admired Fadlallah's strong stance against honor killings and support for women's rights, CNN heeded calls from pro-Israel groups for her termination...

In the case of Nasr, CNN took full responsibility for what she wrote and promoted on her personal Twitter account. The news organization saw her tweet as a reflection on its reputation and credibility, and took action. The Washington Post has done nothing, however, about Rubin's approving promotion of her friend's call for genocide.

Does the Washington Post have a policy on the promotion of mass murder by its staffers? It is up to Post Ombudsman Patrick Pexton to explain if Rubin's act was permissible according to his paper's ethical guidelines, and if so, why...MORE...LINK

Why was “anti-Semitic” African-American Occupy protesters fired, but not Jewish supremacist Occupy critic?

From:
Occupy Wall Street: Undertones of Anti-Semitism

(The Occidental Observer) -- by Kevin MacDonald --

In my recent blog “Jews and the Occupy Wall St. Protests” I mentioned that popular Los Angeles-area radio talk host Bill Handel said he wasn’t upset with Wall St. because “my tribe controls Wall St.” Handel is happily continuing his lucrative career without any problems at all. But Patricia McAlister, a Black substitute teacher in the LA school system has been fired for saying that the ”Zionist Jews who run these big banks and the Federal Reserve … need to be run out of this country.”

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmXUtwTLcQ

Granted, McAlister went quite a bit beyond Handel in advocating that Jews be expelled, but I rather doubt that that is the issue. Simply pointing to Jews in the context of the financial meltdown would have been quite enough. Indeed, there has been quite a bit of comment about lone protesters like David Smith, a regular at the New York protest, who has gotten quite a bit of attention for his signs, including “Google: Zionist Jews control Wall St.”...

Adbusters may have been widely condemned, but it was surely right to emphasize the Jews who were involved in promoting the Iraq war. People are simply not paying attention or engaging in self-deception if they fail to accept the critical role of the Israel Lobby, the Israeli government, and strongly identified American Jews with close family and personal ties to the Israeli right and ensconced in high positions in the American government (Mearsheimer and Walt; Steve Sniegoski; my version; there are many others).

The JTA wording shows once again that actual data on Jewish power and influence are completely irrelevant to Jewish activists. Similarly, Alana Goodman, writing for Commentary, is concerned about the involvement of Adbusters, referring to its article naming Jewish neocons: Adbusters “peddled some of the more feverish theories about American Jews, neoconservatism, and the Bush administration.” (See also Charlie Wolf’s blog in the Mail Online, “Organizer Behind “Occupy Wall Street” Has History of Anti-Jewish Writing.”)

For anything except Nobel prize winners, Jewish identity is completely irrelevant.

Obviously, we should certainly not be cowed by Jewish denials from independently investigating the role of Jews in the financial meltdown. In fact, the reflexive denials by Jewish activists reinforce the general impression that the mainstream Jewish community will never engage in a dispassionate, rational discussion of Jewish influence.

Admittedly, the case for Jewish involvement in financial misbehavior is different from situations, such as promoting the Iraq war and the intellectual and political movements discussed in The Culture of Critique, where strongly identified Jews are pursuing specific Jewish interests. Nevertheless, I have presented the case that Jewish economic behavior does indeed reflect historic patterns, including the acceptance of white collar criminals in the Jewish community...MORE...LINK

Zionists probe rising China for weakness on Jewish question; (Just wait until Chinese find out Jewry was behind ideology of mass murderer Mao)

Introduction by Chris Moore:

The Zionists sent a saccharine sweet, Chinese-speaking Jewish-American princess to probe the Chinese on the Jewish question.

Will the Chinese be as easily duped by Zionist Jewry as have been ignorant (and willfully corrupt) Westerners? From the following video, it would certainly appears so.

On the other hand, Russians and eastern Europeans are far wiser on the Jewish question because they are painfully aware of the mass murder, destruction and devastation that Jewish Bolshevism left in its wake.

Similarly, perhaps once the Chinese make the connection between Maoist mass murder and Jewry's historical instigation of Chinese communism, they too will wise up fast, not unlike how more and more Westerners are finally waking up to Jewry's warmongering and financial predations in America and Europe in the wake of the various organized Jewry-instigated American Mideast war fiascos and economic meltdowns.

The Internet is changing everything; no longer can the Judeofascists control the narrative by buying up mass media and buying off politicians and institutions.

This democratization of knowledge, more than anything, will see to it that the Judeofascists and their sickening Left-Right collaborators are ultimately held accountable for their epic crimes against humanity, including the up to 75 million Chinese murdered by Mao's execution of just another version of yet another Jewish-designed, totalitarian Trojan horse built to pursue Judeofascist interests.

-------------------------

From:
What do the Chinese think of Jews?

(YouTube.com) -- by jtanews --

Saturday, October 22, 2011

Is organized Jewry volitional in its own evil agenda, or merely unwitting captive of an evil ideology? Zionists say it's cognizant and culpable

Introduction by Chris Moore:

This is the question Gilad Atzmon raises in the following article, and it's an important question, particularly for Jews who claim Judaism isn't inherently fascist.

If that's the case, then why is the vast majority of organized Jewry so hell bent on perpetuating Israeli Zionism and Diaspora Zionism, which is unquestionably a fascist enterprise? And why is the vast majority of Jewish leadership so hell bent on keeping the vast majority of Jewry on the ideological Zionist "reservation"?

Here's my take on exactly what's going on here.

Many people have heard the expression "Jews are just like everyone else, only more so," meaning Jewish fanatics are prone to taking any human characteristic or ideology to an unnatural extreme.

Similarly, it has historically been a human characteristic and failure to allow the most ruthless, cunning and fanatical elements of society to claw their way to the top, and then dictate from there. This is exactly what's going on with organized Jewry today, which is clearly being run by extreme fascists, who are deferred to by their followers, which consequently implicates the vast majority of Jewry in Zionism's evil agenda and designs.

This evil Zionist leadership knows it is now in the spotlight, that it can no longer go about claiming that it is merely the reactionary "victim" of history acting out of self-preservation, or that it is merely the tail being wagged by the Anglo-American Empire dog. Why? Because its Diaspora wing has so thoroughly penetrated the leadership of Anglo-American Empire, and is directing that Empire to pursue Zionists interests.

Consequently, this evil Zionist leadership knows it needs the vast majority of Jewry as a kind of mass "bodyguard" to defend against its critics, harass antagonists with accusations of "anti-Semitism," and to point to to validate claims that critics are attacking "all" Jews, whom it is essentially hiding behind as the heat gets turned up.

Here's the kicker, though. This patriarchal, hierarchical, top-down organizational structure, which conditions the Jewish cult to acquiesce to its Jewish guru leadership, is inherent to the Jewish religion itself from Abraham through Moses through David. Later, the Pharisees (biblical precursors to modern Jewish groupings like the Jewish Bolsheviks, Jewish Zionists and Jewish neocons) became the collective patriarchal leadership, which is how Jewry is run today -- by a collective pharisaic leadership.

And here's the second kicker. The post-WWII West is currently being run by what I call "The Defective Generation," (defective due to its cowardly acquiescence to and complicity in the face of Jewish predations to the point where Jewish Zionists are now largely running the place, whereas previous generations of Christians and Christian-partisans running the Greco-Christian West had far less to zero tolerance for Jewish predations). Consequently, the current generation of Jewish leadership is also defective, meaning it reflects the general low ethics, low character, low honor and lack of principle of the larger, ignoble, Defective Generation of Gentile elites that surrounds it and enables it.

Hence, because "Jews are like everyone else, only more so," what this means is that the current generation of Jewish leadership itself is exponentially more heinous, reckless, selfish, negligent and irresponsible than The Defective Generation of non-Jews that surround it.

This is the Jewish leadership that Atzmon is currently up against, like David vs. the fascist Goliath that organized Jewry has become...or always was.

--------------------------

From:
Gilad Atzmon: Thank God for the Jewish Chronicle

(gilad.co.uk) -- by Gilad Atzmon --

As always, the London Jewish Chronicle (JC) is providing us with an accurate insight into Jewish influence within the media and beyond. The JC is desperate to stop my book, The Wandering Who -- and it is also foolish enough to disclose its tactics, openly revealing to us the pressure which some elements within the Jewish community are willing to mount on Britain’s leading newspapers and other outlets...

The JC complains that “in the book Atzmon discusses his belief that ‘the Holocaust religion was well-established’ before the Nazis carried out aspects of the Shoah including the Final Solution and Kristallnacht.”

The JC is absolutely correct here. That is exactly what I am discussing. And yet, the question is, what is wrong with doing so? Is it racist or anti-Semitic? And indeed, I also insist that trauma is inherent to Jewish Culture. Here is, for instance, an old Jewish joke from the 19th century

A Jewish Telegram:

‘Get Worried, details to follow’.

In ‘The Wandering Who’ I contend that Jewish identity politics is defined by a unique condition, namely, ‘Pre Traumatic Stress Disorder’. It is the ‘future trauma’ that shapes the Jewish present and ideology.

The JC is also concerned with the following quote: "It is more than likely that 'Jews' do not have a centre or headquarters. It is more than likely that they aren't aware of their particular role within the entire system, the way an organ is not aware of its role within the complexity of an organism."

And yet I am puzzled by their concern: what is exactly wrong with the above? If anything, it suggests that there are no Jewish conspiracies, and that Jews as people are actually innocent of the sinister associations of such.

Or, does the JC prefer to argue otherwise? Would The JC insist that Lord Levy knew exactly what he was doing when he was the leading fundraiser for a government that took Britain into an illegal war? Does the JC prefer to argue that Neocons David Aaronovitch and Nick Cohen knew exactly what they were doing when they advocated the same war on every British press outlet that was foolish enough to let their voice be heard?

I actually seem to be slightly kinder to Aaronovitch, Cohen, Levy, Saban, Wolfowitz, Freidman, Sharon, Peres, Livni, Greenspan, Foxman and many others: I am happy to agree that they were hijacked by a lethal ideology or culture rather than being consciously sinister...

And now here is the good news: it seems as if the JC/Guardian joint efforts to stop ‘The Wandering Who’ have been totally counterproductive, for according to Amazon, The Wandering Who is number 2 on the ‘Bestsellers in Religious History of Judaism’ list...MORE...LINK

Same cabal of Judeofascist predators that cooked up Iraq war lies spearheaded Obama's attacks on Libya

From:
The Zionist Murder Of Muammar Gaddafi

(RealZionistNews) -- by Brother Nathanael Kapner --

...Gaddafi’s main threat to International Jewry’s Banking Cartel was his plan for a common African currency—the gold-backed Libyan dinar—which would have replaced the all fiat-issued US dollar, British pound, and French franc as the main currency in Africa.

Jewish banking interests were clearly at stake as the US dollar is maintained by the Jewish-run Federal Reserve Bank; the British pound by the Jewish-run Central Bank of England; and the French franc by the Jewish-run Banque de France.

Is it any surprise then that the three major invaders of Libya — America, England, and France — whose Zionist-bought leaders: Obama, Cameron, & Sarkozy, are praising the brutal and slow murder of Libyan chief, Muammar Gaddafi?

No, it is no surprise at all. View Entire Story Here, Here & Here.

CALLING FOR BOOTS on the ground, Jewish president of the Council on Foreign Relations, Richard Haass, after admitting that the Libyan invasion was to oust Gaddafi via “regime change” — sought a US-led NATO occupation of Tripoli.

In a quick follow-up to Haass’ blood thirsty call, Jewish neocon Philip Zelikow, former US State Department Counsellor and 9/11 Commission Head, wrote that “Gaddafi’s fall” would spark a “Democratic Spring” (read Jewish puppet governments) throughout the Arab world.

Leading the Zionist fray, it was the same Jewish sleaze balls who brought us the Iraq War through their lies about Saddam’s ‘weapons of mass destruction,’ namely, the “Project for a New American Century,” now reincarnated as, “The Foreign Policy Initiative,” who urged in their June 2011, “Open Letter To House Republicans,” the toppling of Muammar Gaddafi.

THE SIGNATORIES to the Letter read like an invitation to a Bar Mitzvah…this time a very bloody one indeed:

Elliott Abrams, John Podhoretz, Robert and Fred Kagan, Lawrence Kaplan, Robert Lieber, Michael Makovsky, Eric Edelman, Kenneth Weinstein, Paul Wolfowitz, Randy Scheunemann. View Entire Story Here & Here.

And of course, the leader of the Zionist rat pack, Jewish neocon William Kristol, apparently dictates US military policy as evinced in this Fox News interview: “No we cannot leave Gaddafi in power and we won’t leave Gaddafi in power.”

Kristol and his fellow blood-thirsty Jews have now seen their dream come true.

In violation of both International Law and the Geneva Convention’s prohibition of the mutilation of prisoners of war, Muammar Gaddafi is now among the Zionist-murdered dead...MORE...LINK

Friday, October 21, 2011

As always, Judeofascists spin themselves as morally superior when the opposite is true

From:
Dying of Shmaltz

(On the US and Israel) -- by Jerome Slater --

While uneasy about the asymmetry of the Shalit deal between Israel and Hamas--a thousand Palestinian prisoners ( invariably described in Israel as “terrorists”) for one Israeli--the Israeli and the American Jewish media are also full of hymns of self-praise for us wonderful Jews: the “price” we paid was “a moral victory for Israel,” demonstrates our adherence to “profound Jewish values” such as “the pride in the value we place on every single human life,” is “a sign of humanity” that is “sadly absent in large parts of the world, especially in this region,” and the like. The implication is unmistakable: we are different from them, the parents of the 1000 Palestinians, and the nation they represent, either did not grieve or had no right to grieve over their “children” in Israeli prisons, nor rejoice over their release.

The blatant racism and infuriating claims of moral superiority aside, there are indeed significant differences between the Israeli and Palestinian prisoner situations. While some of the Palestinian prisoners were truly terrorists seeking the unjust cause of the destruction of Israel, surely many others were essentially soldiers in a just cause, national liberation and the creation of an independent state in a small part of Palestine. On the other hand, Shalit was a soldier of a nation whose real cause (continuing the de facto occupation of the Palestinians and Jewish expansion into what remains of their territory) is unjust and whose “profound Jewish values” and “adherence to the dignity of all human lives” does not prevent it—stop me when you think I’m misstating the facts—from occupying, killing, repressing, imprisoning, blockading, and deliberately inflicting deep economic as well as psychological pain on another people...MORE...LINK

White nationalist (boooo) David Duke with penetrating critique (Yeahhh!) of neo-fascist, Zionist banksters and their political lackeys

From:
Occupy Zionist Wall Street by David Duke

(YouTube.com) -- by drdduke --

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Rachel Abrams, wife of Bush admin Jewish Zionist Israel-firster Elliot, sends out a Judeofascist incantation following release of Gilad Shalit

From:
GILAD!!!!!!!!!!

(Bad Rachel blog) -- by Rachel Abrams --

He’s free and he’s home in the bosom of his family and his country.

Celebrate, Israel, with all the joyous gratitude that fills your hearts, as we all do along with you.

Then round up his captors, the slaughtering, death-worshiping, innocent-butchering, child-sacrificing savages who dip their hands in blood and use women—those who aren’t strapping bombs to their own devils’ spawn and sending them out to meet their seventy-two virgins by taking the lives of the school-bus-riding, heart-drawing, Transformer-doodling, homework-losing children of Others—and their offspring—those who haven’t already been pimped out by their mothers to the murder god—as shields, hiding behind their burkas and cradles like the unmanned animals they are, and throw them not into your prisons, where they can bide until they’re traded by the thousands for another child of Israel, but into the sea, to float there, food for sharks, stargazers, and whatever other oceanic carnivores God has put there for the purpose...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

These are the kinds of satanic curses and incantations that Judeofascists have been throwing at Christians and Western civilization for some 2,000 years.

I guess that partially explains why they were historically thrown out of 108 locations in the West, and more recently by Arab countries, totaling 109 expulsions.

And yet, in modern times, they're the beloved of so many Gentile ("dumb goy") collaborators, lackeys, apologists, and useful idiots in the crumbling West. There's got to be some kind of connection there between Western decline and Judeofascist ascension, but I'll be damned if their fast-sinking, Western goy dupes will allow themselves to see it...or even think it.

-------------------------
Are those snakes in her hair? Rachel Abrams sends out a blood-drenched, Kabbalah-esque incantation to celebrate Shalit's release

Liberals love Jewish intellect until its Zionist paranoia and warmongering half shows up; then neo-fascists love Jewish intellect

From:
How Liberals Buy Into Stupid Wars

(Paul Pillar) -- by Paul R. Pillar --

Richard Cohen's column in Tuesday's Washington Post, under the headline “Dangerous behavior from Iran,” deserves scrutiny, and not just to pick on Cohen (although he deserves to be picked on for this kind of work). The column exemplifies several of the types of distorted thinking and non-thinking that were critical in pushing the United States into an enormous blunder of a war eight years ago and are threatening a repeat performance with another of the countries in the same part of the world that has a four-letter name starting with “I.” Moreover, the column by Cohen—who on most matters other than stumbling into disastrous wars can be considered a liberal—illustrates how the arguments and attitudes that have greased the skids on which the United States can slide into such a war are not the exclusive province of neocons or others who are the prime movers of such misadventures.

The column begins, unsurprisingly, with the outrage du jour: that strange plot involving DEA informants and a used car salesman in Texas. Cohen has a nifty way to dispose of the chief reason skeptics have found it hard to believe this was an officially instigated Iranian operation—namely, the disconnect between the crazy nature of the plot and the careful tradecraft that the Iranians have consistently exhibited. “I agree” the plot was crazy, says Cohen. “But so is Iran.” It's a rhetorical twofer: not only is the bizarre plot kept in play, but it is done in a way that pushes the main theme of the anti-Iran agitators, which is that Iranian leaders are supposedly irrational and thus cannot be trusted not to do crazy things with whatever capabilities they have, especially a capability as momentous as a nuclear weapon. “The mistake with Iran,” says Cohen, “is the tendency to think its leadership is rational.” But like others who invoke this theme, Cohen adduces nothing in the record of behavior by the Islamic Republic that suggests irrationality and ignores the fact that the record is overwhelmingly one of caution and careful calculation...MORE...LINK

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

I'm working on an analysis of Zionism as a Trojan horse for neo-fascism. Please donate at least $25 each so I can complete the article. --Chris Moore

This is a new program I'm trying to implement so I can afford to take the time to do more in-depth articles along the lines of my recent "Neolibs and neocons claim the Democratic Party is anti-Semitic when they know it's actually virulently Jewish supremacist," only longer.

The proposed article, under the working title "Zionism, Trojan horse for neo-fascism," will explore the ways in which Israel and the "plight of the Jewish people" is being manipulated by both elite Jewish Zionists and elite non-Jews as a pretext to a) scam the public into spending billions on wars and bankster bailouts; b) hide behind the smokescreen of "anti-Semitism" accusations to fend off criticism; c) destroy Islamic civilization under the auspices of "progressiveism"; and d) implement neo-fascism.

The idea is to raise $500 in donations via PayPal in increments of at least $25 dollars each (more would be great get the ball rolling faster), so I can afford to take the time away from my regular work to get the analysis researched and published.

In these difficult economic times, it's hard to justify taking the blocks of time away from my shrinking, regular-income work necessary to complete these longer articles without getting some sort of compensation in return. Isn't this one small example of exactly how the free enterprise system (which currently seems to be in the process of being overthrown on a macro level, but that's another article) should be able to at least sustain itself on a micro level? (Trying to keep the faith, here.)

As I'm sure all of you who are regulars here are well aware by now, there's no paying market for this kind of work in mainstream media, which is easily as corrupt as so many of our other institutions, if not more so.

That leaves it up to you.

If the $500 is successfully raised within a certain time horizon, I will let readers know that the project is under way. If the $500 is not raised, the project will be abandoned, and any donations earmarked for the project returned.

I will update readers regularly on the fundraising progress and with reminders of what I'm trying to do. My hope is that projects like this (donations in exchange for original output) can be a regular source of income so I can afford to spend less time money-grubbing at less important enterprises and more time working on original research and writing in these crucial times.

Thanks for your participation! Please donate at PayPal button on right hand column today...

...it's as easy as a couple of clicks...

...only takes a few seconds, and they take credit cards, too...

...well go on, what are you waiting for...!?! (LOL)

Regards, Chris Moore, editor

P.S. The debit to your PayPal account or credit card statement will read as paid to "Chris Moore, editor"

Teacher fired for free speech against Jewish Zionist bankers on her private time. Zionism is the Trojan horse for neo-fascism.

Introduction by Chris Moore:

Government facilitated terrorist attacks on 9/11 with Zionist fingerprints all over them. Lied by government into Mideast wars that benefit Israel, the military-industrial complex and bankster dollar hegemony. Ongoing wars in the Mideast to distract from domestic theft, plunder and economic bubbles engineered by Zionist bankers in partnership with crony government, with Israel's "security" as one of the pretexts. Police state "homeland security" harassment of average Americans simply trying to travel from place to place. Police attacks on protesters demonstrating on Wall Street against banksters.

Now, blacklistings, firings, and denial of free speech under the auspices that it is "hate" speech to criticize organized Jewish fascism and theft.

The neo-fascists and Zionists are rallying around each other. Zionism is the Trojan horse for neo-fascism, no question.

***

Anglo-fascists (e.g. kabbalah-worshipping Freemasons and neo-royalists) are full partners in this Judeofascist master plan. But they need a “victim” and “humanitarian” pretense, and a “liberal” cover, such as “saving the Jews from anti-Semitism,” (subtext rationale for Mideast wars) or “sparing the Jews from anti-Semitism” (rationale for shutting down free speech against fascist Jewry and bankster theft).

Being in total control of the Democratic Party, the Jewish Zionist fascists are perfect partners for neo-royalist Anglo-fascists. Zionism (aka championing the “downtrodden Jews”) is the perfect Trojan horse.

We need a second American revolution against these neo-royalist, neo-fascist and Zionist interlopers seeking to re-win the revolutionary war they lost 225 years ago.

This lady has it right: Zionist Jews don't belong in America. But neither do their Anglo-fascist collaborators, who are also long-time, self-serving enemies of Western civilization.


From:
Patricia MacCallister fired after exercising free speech at Occupy Wall Street

(YouTube.com) -- by gonobdotcom --

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Neolibs and neocons claim the Democratic Party is anti-Semitic when they know it's actually virulently Jewish supremacist

(LibertarianToday.com) -- by Chris Moore --

Jewish, neoliberal New York Times columnist David Brooks set off a storm of accusations of "anti-Semitism" against the Occupy Wall Street movement following his October 10 column titled "The Milquetoast Radicals," in which he condemned the movement as "small, contentious and symbolic," and sparked by anti-Jewish sentiments
.

"Take the Occupy Wall Street movement," wrote Brooks:
"This uprising was sparked by the magazine Adbusters, previously best known for the 2004 essay, “Why Won’t Anyone Say They Are Jewish?” — an investigative report that identified some of the most influential Jews in America and their nefarious grip on policy.

"If there is a core theme to the Occupy Wall Street movement, it is that the virtuous 99 percent of society is being cheated by the richest and greediest 1 percent.

"This is a theme that allows the people in the 99 percent to think very highly of themselves. All their problems are caused by the nefarious elite."
Influential neoconservative talk radio personality Rush Limbaugh quickly picked up on Brooks' innuendo and took it a step further on his Oct 11 program, inferring that in addition to Occupy Wall Street, the Democratic Party was dabbling in anti-Semitism, as well.
"...the 99% versus the 1% is another angle that the group is talking about here, and Wall Street and bankers, those two terms have been anti-Semitic code for Jews in this country for a long time. Occupier, Occupy Wall Street Now. I’ve often said, I said last week he who controls the definition of words, the meaning of words, controls the debate. He who controls the language controls the debate. There’s a lot of interesting stuff here. Occupy Wall Street Now, 99%, that leaves 1%, roughly the percentage of Jews in the population, too. And Wall Street and bankers have been anti-Semitic code for Jews in this country going back quite a while.

"Now, what’s happening here is that the Democrats...This is where Brooks may be on to something. It’s too early to tell. But the Democrats are embracing this group of people. They are embracing them big time. The Democrats — Jan Schakowsky in Illinois, members of Congress — cannot help themselves...But this Adbusters bunch has a history of anti-Semitism, proud anti-Semitism. (interruption) The article about Jewish “neocons” was just one of their pieces, Snerdley, that you mentioned here, along those lines...So here’s the point: If this group is being organized and paid for by a bunch of anti-Semites and the Democrat Party goes overboard in embracing this group of people, then this could be problem for the Democrat coalition, not to mention the fact that they could unleash a bunch of anti-Jewish racism down there if they’re not careful with this, ’cause there’s much more going on here than you just see at the surface."
Finally, Jewish neoconservative William Kristol, Editor of the The Weekly Standard, co-founder of The Project for a New American Century and chairman of the Emergency Committee for Israel issued a statement inferring that much of the Left in its entirety is anti-Semitic, writing that “It’s not surprising that elements of the modern left are anti-Semitic. It is surprising that respectable liberals have praised the protesters while ignoring the anti-Semitism. Liberals have pretended to see nothing hateful and hear nothing hateful, and therefore have said nothing to rebuke their allies. Will they now speak up?”

Kristol's group then issued an advertisement that inferred leaders of the Democratic Party were supportive of the alleged anti-Semitic current within Occupy Wall Street, and were refusing to "stand up to the mob."

As reported by Ben Smith at Politico
:
The Emergency Committee for Israel, a Republican group that's focused primarily on criticizing President Obama's Israel policy, is opening a new front on Occupy Wall Street and the politicians -- notably Nancy Pelosi and Obama -- who have spoken sympathetically of the protests, with a new ad featuring anti-Semitic and anti-Israel signs and incidents into a claim that the events are motivated by anti-Semitism.

"Tell President Obama and Leader Pelosi to stand up to the mob," says the narrator of the spot, which the group says will air in a "substantial" buy in New York and Washington.
Of course, people who know its history and who are familiar with the current state of the Democratic Party know that far from being anti-Semitic, the Party is actually Jewish supremacist, and is probably more so today than it has ever been.

Zev Chafets of The Daily Beast recently encapsulated the Jewish supremacist bent of the Party at the domestic level
:
Jews are less than 2 percent of the American population, but they are major players in the Democratic Party. Debbie Wasserman Schultz is the chairwoman of the national committee. Steve Israel heads the House reelection committee. The party’s intelligentsia and pundit class have a higher bar mitzvah quotient than the average B’nai Brith bowling team. Three of the four Supreme Court justices appointed by Democratic presidents are Jews. So are a quarter of the members of the Democratic Senate Caucus and 45 congressmen (all but one, Eric Cantor, are Democrats).

The Washington Post has estimated that Jews provide 60 percent of the party’s major individual contributions. The actual stat, according to a Democratic insider privy to unreleased research, puts the figure closer to 80 percent. In 2004, when so-called 527 organizations provided the biggest contributions, four Democratic donors—George Soros, Peter Lewis, Steven Bing, and the Sandler family—coughed up $73 million, more than the next 20 contributors, Republican and Democratic, combined. Jews are not simply supporters of the Democratic Party. They are stakeholders.

Like all stakeholders, Jews—and their interests—are taken seriously. Some are professional: academia, the entertainment industry (which depends on a good U.S. image abroad for much of its income), the high-tech sector, the legal establishment, financial institutions, teachers' unions, and liberal NGOs are all disproportionately run and staffed by Jews...
And what about Democratic Party support for Jewish supremacism at the international level?

President Obama was recently celebrated by even right-wing Israeli press for “the most pro-Israel [U.N.] speech anyone has heard at that world forum for a very long time,” because he "not only adopted all of the Israeli arguments against recognising a Palestinian state by means of the UN, he adopted the basic Israeli narrative.”

Additionally, dozens of Democrats were among the 81 members of Congress from both parties (nearly 1/5 of the entire congressional body) who took a luxurious, all-expenses-paid, Israel lobby-funded junket to the Jewish state that amounted to an indoctrination tour. (Such pro-Zionist, indoctrination trips have been going on for decades.)

This Jewish supremacist Democratic Party leadership is what the neolibs and neocons, the Rush Limbaughs, the William Kristols and the David Brooks', are trying to claim is anti-Semitic? How on earth do these pro-Zionist, quasi-fascists think they can get away with such a big lie?

In addition to being intellectually dishonest propagandists and Israel-first, Zionist lackeys, the reason they're lying about supposed anti-Semitism in the Democratic Party is because they have have nothing to lose by doing so.

They know the Democrats won't point out that even though Jews are under 2% of the US population, 25% of the Democratic Party senators are Jewish, even as there's only one Black Democratic senator (despite Blacks providing something like 25% of Democratic Party votes);

they know that the Democrats won't point out that President Obama has taken more campaign donations from the overwhelmingly Jewish “securities and investment” industry from 1989 through 2010 than any other political figure in the country;

in short, they know that the Democrats can't defend themselves from charges of anti-Semitism by pointing out that the Party of "equality" and "social justice" and "progressivism" is actually a party of racist, Jewish supremacism because that would unmask it for the fraud that it truly is.

So how will the Democrats react? To prove that they're not anti-Semitic, they'll become even more pro-Zionist than they already are...which is exactly the reaction that the Israel first neocons and neolibs are hoping for in their ongoing quest for World War III against Islamic civilization.

Wouldn't it be nice to someday have an America-first, explicitly anti-Zionist party to vote for that would refuse to play into the endless rituals of "anti-Semitism" accusations followed by ever more consequential pro-Zionist and Jewish supremacist policy carried out by the Democrats and Republicans decade after decade? Wouldn't it be nice to have a party that responded to "anti-Semitism" charges by declaring "Yes, we're anti-Zionist and anti-fascist, so what?"

Such a party MUST emerge, and emerge soon, if America is to be saved from the Zionist fascism being ratcheted tighter and tighter by the neolib-neocon two-party regime that currently occupies Washington.

It may be debatable whether organized Jewry was always predatory and fascist, but it's beyond doubt today

From:
Yoav Shamir’s Defamation

(Counter Currents) -- by Greg Johnson --

Yoav Shamir’s Defamation (2009) is a must-see movie. Shamir is an Israeli Jewish documentary film-maker. His other works include Checkpoint (2003), 5 Days (2005), and Flipping Out (2008).

Born in Tel Aviv in 1970, Shamir professes never to have experienced anti-Semitism, although he has heard about it all his life. He has decided, therefore, to go abroad in search of anti-Semitism, traveling to the United States, Russia, Ukraine, and Poland.
Although Shamir adopts the pose of a naïve observer, he seems to be advancing a thesis. He is apparently opposed to the Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands and to ongoing human rights violations. He believes that Jews use the holocaust and the specter of anti-Semitism to give themselves license to commit evil and to silence their critics.

Throughout Defamation, Shamir cuts back and forth between several different stories. This does not make the movie hard to follow, and in fact it makes it more engaging. But for the purposes of a review, I will separate them out.

Israeli Jews on Anti-Semitism

Before leaving Israel, Shamir told his 90-something grandmother, whose family came to Palestine in the 19th century, long before the state of Israel was founded, about his project. Her response is quite revealing. When told that Jews in the Diaspora complain constantly about anti-Semitism, she says: “Why don’t they come here?” Her answer is that Jews remain in the Diaspora because, “Jews are crooks. Jews love money.” They stay in the Diaspora because they are parasites who “want to live without working,” through usury, “selling liquor,” and other “monkey business.” She goes on to say that she is a “true Jew,” because she does not let money or anything else define her. It is a remarkable statement.

To Western ears, of course, her views sound shockingly “anti-Semitic.” But they were actually shared by Theodor Herzl and the other founders of Zionism, who frankly acknowledged that one reason for anti-Semitism was the parasitic economic profile of Diaspora Jewry: usury, selling liquor, catering to (and promoting) vice, etc. The purpose of Zionism was to create a homeland in which Jews could attain freedom and self-sufficiency without direct, day-to-day competition with non-Jews or temptations to assimilate. It would be interesting to know if her attitudes are merely a relic of an older generation or are widespread among younger Israeli Jews.

Perhaps I am reading too much into the grandmother’s claim that a “true Jew” does not let money or anything else define him, but I read this as a rejection of Gilad Atzmon’s claim that non-religious Jews define their identity purely in opposition to non-Jews rather than in terms of anything positive. The grandmother’s vision of positive Jewish self-assertion and self-definition was part of the original Zionist vision. Zionism is the Jewish version of racial nationalism: the national self-assertion and self-determination of a people, a nation, i.e., a community related by blood. But as Shamir goes on to demonstrate, this Zionist aspiration has largely failed, for Israelis today overwhelmingly define themselves in terms of enmity toward non-Jews.

When Shamir tells his driver about his project, the driver scoffs at the idea that anti-Semitism is something serious, because “Jews run the world.” I assume that the driver is an Israeli Jew and that he is thinking specifically of Diaspora Jews. If so, this indicates that at least some Israeli Jews have beliefs about Diaspora Jews that are labeled anti-Semitic when held by non-Jews.

When Shamir visits a major Israeli newspaper, he speaks to Noah Klinger, an elderly holocaust survivor (complete with numbers tattooed on his arm). This gentleman monitors anti-Semitism around the world. Which countries are anti-Semitic? All of them, it turns out. When Shamir prods him about objectivity, his response is basically “Why do I have to be objective? Were they [the Nazis] objective?” Two wrongs make a right, apparently.

When Shamir speaks to two young Jews at the paper who apparently receive Anti-Defamation League reports from the US and repackage them as news stories, the attitude of the male conveys a certain amount of cynicism about the whole procedure. He thinks he is part of a racket.

Shamir also speaks with Uri Avnery, a former MP and a peace activist, and shows a meeting sponsored by his organization Gush Shalom (Peace Bloc), in which John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, authors of The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy, spoke about their work. Avnery is a very dignified and impressive individual. Another member of Gush Shalom, Teddy Katz, also makes a similar impression.

Although Avnery does overstate his case sometimes, which invites caricature, his considered opinion is that anti-Semitism is a real but negligible force in the world today. “You’d need a magnifying glass to find it.” He believes that the Anti-Defamation League and other Diaspora Jews promote fear of anti-Semitism and awareness of the holocaust in order to drum up support for the Israeli right wing so that they can continue occupation and settlement of Palestinian lands, human rights abuses against Palestinians, and aggression against Israel’s neighbors.

Avnery and his group believe that Israel will only achieve peaceful relations with the Palestinians and its Arab neighbors if the power of Diaspora Jewry and the Israeli right wing is broken. This requires that the fear of anti-Semitism and the grip of the holocaust be weakened. Consciousness of anti-Semitism and the holocaust cultivates feelings of self-pity, anger, revenge. But enmity makes it impossible to pursue peace.

Shamir also takes us to a three day conference organized by the Israeli Foreign Ministry at which Jewish scholars from around the world convened to denounce and rebut Mearsheimer and Walt’s The Israel Lobby. At the end of the conference, David Hirsch, a portly sociology professor with a British accent, stood up to point out that not one of the speakers said a word about Israeli occupation, settlements, and human rights violations on Palestinian lands and how these might contribute to anti-Zionist sentiments around the world.

The other speakers replied with indignation and feigned incomprehension. When Shamir defended Hirsh’s position, an angry American Jew accused him of being like a battered wife who blames herself for her predicament because the alternative—that she lives with a monster—is too depressing to contemplate.

He does not complete his analogy, but the implication is clear: we goyim are monsters. Jews bear no blame for anti-Semitism because anti-Semitism is just a fact of nature, an expression of the baseless wickedness of gentiles. It is disturbing that this idea is widespread among America’s wealthiest and most powerful ethnic group. It would not seem likely that they have our best interests at heart...MORE...LINK

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Is Jewish doctrine's absence of ethics towards non-Jews behind runaway Wall Street greed?

(By Chris Moore) -- Jewish journalist Glenn Greenwald has an article on Salon.com documenting that President Obama has taken more campaign donations from the “securities and investment” industry from 1989 through 2010 than any other political figure in the country.

Greenwald's point is that "Wall Street’s most lavishly funded politician" is hardly someone who will be interested in reforming the corrupt economic order that so quickly and easily whisked Obama to the top office in the land. Indeed, such a person is less likely to reform the corrupt Federal Reserve banking system, Wall Street's plunder of American jobs and industry, and the outsourcing of American jobs overseas in order to increase Wall Street profit margins than any other politician out there.

One un-explicit subtext of Greenwald's article was the large number of Jews who are responsible for Wall Street's insatiable greed, and the corrupt system that feeds them. Here are some of the verifiably Jewish operators who have enriched and empowered themselves by way of this system that Greenwald criticizes not as part of a Jewish racket, but in relation to Wall Street greed, corruption, and the rigging of the rules in a way that allows a tiny percentage of elites to funnel such a disproportionate amount of American wealth to themselves, and bankrupt thousands upon thousands of average Americans in the process:

Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, Rep. Barney Frank, former treasury secretary and Obama top economic adviser Larry Summers, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, Rep. Chuck Schumer, Obama's former Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, Obama's former director of Office of Management and Budget, now a top executive at Citigroup Peter Orszag...

This Jewish list comports with the exhaustive research and documentation carried out by writers for the Occidental Observer finding huge numbers of American Jews behind all manner of U.S. financial shenanigans, shady business dealings and corrupt enterprises for decades.

And Jewish-network criminalism has paid off. Research by the Jewish Telegraph found that "at least" 35% of the Forbes 400 wealthiest Americans is Jewish -- a remarkable finding given that Jews comprise less than 2% of the American population.

So what is behind Jewry's insatiable greed and utter lack of ethics?

Ex-Israeli Jew Gilad Atzmon, who has become a leading critic not only of Zionism, but of what he calls Jewish ideology or "Jewishness," recently put his finger on why Israeli Jewish Zionists tend towards outright criminalism vis-a-vis non-Jewish Palestinians...and ironically, it has to do with Jewry's legalistic culture.
According to [Jewish Zionist propaganda agent] Golan Azulai, everything Israel is doing is nothing but ‘legal’. Azulai is obviously wrong. But you may note that the Hasbara man cannot distinguish between ‘the legal’ and ‘the ethical’. This is indeed a fundamental problem within the Jewish discourse both secular and religious.

Judaism is the acceptance of God’s law. It is not an ethically oriented precept- it is a religious method of blind observance. Tragically enough, Zionism that was there initially to ‘liberate’ the Jew is, in practice, just another method of blind observance. In a Talmudic manner, Zionism would cling to legalism and avoid any form of ethical thinking. This fact alone explains why Israel is the biggest threat to humanity and humanism.
What Atzmon seems to be saying here is that because the indoctrinated Jewish brain is trained to look at the world through biblical and Talmudic legalese spelled out in black and white within Jewish doctrine (for example, instruction that God deeded Israel the Levant, Jews are God's chosen people, non-Jews are inferior to Jews, who have entitled primacy over "goyim," etc.), in the Jewish mind, Jews have a virtual free license to exploit Gentiles so long as some "legalistic" rationale can be found within Jewish doctrine (which given the racist nature of Jewish doctrine towards Gentiles, isn't difficult to find at all). And if some specific rule isn't explicitly spelled out somewhere in black and white for every situation, Jewish psychology interprets this as a license to steal.

This absence of ethics in Jewish doctrine vis-a-vis non-Jews combined with an explicit anti-Gentile antipathy certainly goes a long way towards explaining the psychology behind the Jewish bankers' mentality of entitlement to the American people's money simply because they have "legal" access to the Fed printing presses and credit-creating mechanisms, and also explaining Wall Street Jewry's "legal" plunder of the country's resources by way of industry and job export overseas in order to increase profit margins.

Christian anti-Judeofascism at Occupy Wall Street

Introduction by Chris Moore:

Racist organized Jewry is under increasing siege. "Go to Israel" is becoming a more and more common refrain at Occupy Wall Street for those fed up with Jewish predations to make me wonder if the smarter Jews are getting out while the getting is good, given the rapid rate at which their Diaspora racket is unraveling.

But where are Judeofascism's racist goy (non-Jewish) collaborators going to land? Israel is Jews-only, fascist state for the "chosen" race, so it doesn't want their kind there.

I guess they should have thought about that before jumping into bed with fascist Jewry, but while often clever at money-worship, nests of vipers are never very smart in the long-term moral and ethical realm.

From the biblical era through modern times, history teaches us that fascist Jewry is eventually and inevitably severely chastened for its insatiable greed and organized predations on Gentiles.

What could these Gentile idiots who sold their souls to Jewry possibly have been thinking? Did they really think they could get away with the fascist conspiracy with Jewry in front of God and everyone?

-------------------------
From:
Interview with anti-Jewish protester

(YouTube.com) -- by GoodGuyArktosReturns --

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Is Occupy Wall Street "anti-Semitic"? Whether banksters or Israelis, Zionist thieves accuse righteous critics of anti-Semitism

(By Chris Moore) -- Organized Jewry is pulling the same old Zionist trick on the Occupy Wall Street critics of bankster theft as it pulls on critics of Israeli land theft: painting aggressive opposition to their racist conspiracy as motivated by anti-Semitic bigotry as opposed to justified anger at the crimes of the racket.

From Eli Clifton at Think Progress:
The Emergency Committee for Israel (ECI), has joined the pack of conservative groups working to discredit the Occupy Wall Street Movement. The ECI — a Bill Kristol-Gary Bauer-Rachel Abrams-conceived organization — launched a YouTube ad this morning, seeking to paint the Wall Street protests as anti-Semitic.

The ad, which was faithfully promoted by ECI’s go-to media outlets — Politico’s Ben Smith, the Weekly Standard, and Commentary — alleges that Democratic party leaders are “turning a blind eye to anti-Semitic, anti-Israel attacks,” and urges President Obama and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi to “stand up to the mob.”...

ThinkProgress reported in June that two-thirds of ECIPAC’s contributions in the past election cycle came from Daniel S. Loeb, CEO of Third Point Management, a New York based hedge fund.
It's ironic that Zionist Jewry is accusing the Democratic Party and Obama of tolerance for anti-Semitism given that the Party itself is essentially a front for organized Jewish interests, and Obama a mere puppet.

I guess whether Zionist banksters or Zionist land grabbers, no matter how much power, money, or racist, authoritarian control they have, it's never enough.

And even within the Democratic Party they're flaming racists. Why else with Jews under 2% of the US population, are 25% of the Democratic Party senators Jewish? Meanwhile, there's only one Black senator, despite Blacks providing something like 25% of Democratic Party votes.

"Oh, that's because Jews are smarter and work harder," says racist Jewry.

Yeah, right, sure...it has absolutely nothing to do with the Judeofascist racket.

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Jewish Zionist media oligarch Walter Isaacson wants Zionist-occupied U.S. isolated, doesn't like message competition from other foreign media

From:
Government says PressTV and RussiaToday are the enemy

(YouTube.com) -- by 91177info --



Walter Isaacson (born May 20, 1952) is a writer and biographer. He is the President and CEO of the Aspen Institute, a nonpartisan educational and policy studies organization based in Washington, D.C. He has been the Chairman and CEO of CNN and the Managing Editor of TIME. He was appointed by President Obama to be the Chairman of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, which runs Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and the other international broadcasts of the [Zionist occupied-ed.] U.S. government. -- Wikipedia

Related:
Slick Zionist propagandist Walter Isaacson's long record of insidiously advancing U.S. wars for Israel, Zionism