Zionists predictably slam theory that organized Jewry is racist and greedy, seeks to exploit Holocaust for profit, political and social advantage

From:
Critics slam thesis that alleged ‘Jewish racism’
(Canadian Jewish News) -- By PAUL LUNGEN, Staff Reporter

TORONTO — The University of Toronto is coming under fire for granting its “imprimatur” to a master’s thesis that critics say is an allegation of “Jewish racism” and is of low academic standards.

In a letter to University of Toronto president David Naylor, retired sociology professor Werner Cohn said the thesis posits that “the Jews of the world, most particularly those of Canada and the United States, are racist and seek to oppress people of colour everywhere.”

The thesis, Cohen goes on, is averse to empirical data, and its author, Jennifer Peto, “makes wild… charges against her fellow Jews without a shred of evidence.”

The document in question is titled The Victimhood of the Powerful: White Jews, Zionism and the Racism of Hegemonic Holocaust Education. It was submitted as part of a master of arts degree in the department of sociology and equity studies in education at the Ontario Institute of Studies in Education (OISE), a branch of the University of Toronto.

Summarizing her thesis, Peto stated that it “focuses on issues of Jewish identity, whiteness and victimhood within hegemonic Holocaust education. I argue that today, Jewish people of European descent enjoy white privilege and are among the most socio-economically advantaged groups in the West. Despite this privilege, the organized Jewish community makes claims about Jewish victimhood that are widely accepted within that community and within popular discourse in the West.

“I propose that these claims to victimhood are no longer based in a reality of oppression, but continue to be propagated because a victimized Jewish identity can produce certain effects that are beneficial to the organized Jewish community and the Israeli nation-state.

“I focus on two related Holocaust education projects – the March of the Living (MOL) and the March of Remembrance and Hope (MRH) – to show how Jewish victimhood is instrumentalized in ways that obscure Jewish privilege, deny Jewish racism and promote the interests of the Israeli nation-state.”

Cohn, who is retired from teaching at the University of British Columbia, said the thesis is making the rounds in academic circles and was forwarded to him by a friend at the University of Washington in Seattle. PajamasMedia.com carried a critique of the document and the University of Toronto, while the National Post ran an article from the Eye On A Crazy Planet website, run by blogger Richard Klagsbrun.

Cohn said the University of Toronto had failed to adequately vet the thesis before approving it. “It’s terrible that an arm of the University of Toronto gave it its imprimatur, that this is a contribution to knowledge...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

Peto is correct that ethnocentric organized Jewry is institutionally racist and insatiably greedy, and additionally that it has inflated the Holocaust in order to leverage it for social and political gain, including Western wars for Jewish supremacist Israel. However, she is incorrect that this is an example of "white privilege."

Jews neither see themselves as White, nor identify themselves as White, but rather as Semitic. Additionally, organized Jewry is deeply hostile to Whites, seeing them as the bearers of "anti-Semitic" Christianity and Western civilization.

For the apparently left-wing Peto to characterize organized Jewry as White is as absurd as if she were to characterize wealthy, light-skinned Arab Muslims living luxuriously in America as examples of "white privilege." The reason she does so is because the racist, anti-White Left has developed and advanced the fallacious theory that Whites are the root of all evil for political purposes, and purposes of transferring Western economic wealth cultivated under White Christianity and Western civilization to themselves. (Ironically, this anti-White subtextual racial theory was originated and retailed by Marxist Jewry to serve the Judeofascist-Left political and material agenda, hence Peto is aping Judeofascist talking points with her "white privilege" rhetoric).

In Peto's left-wing framework, for Jewry to be "racist," it can't be Semitic, but it must be "white." If it is Semitic, it would mean perhaps that Whites are NOT the root of all evil, but possible Semites can be evil, too; and if Semites can be the carriers of the "evil" seed, than so can Arabs...and Asians...and Blacks...

Indeed, Peto might as well describe Empire-profiteering warmonger Barack Hussein Obama as an example of "white privilege."

It's time to put this institutionally racist, Judeo-originated ideological tribalism in the rear view mirror, from Left to Right.

Religiously supremacist, ethnically cohesive Zionist Jewry increasingly difficult for its corrupt U.S. partisans and collaborators to paper over

From:
Uri Avnery on Religious Jews
(Occidental Observer) -- by Kevin MacDonald --

Uri Avnery is an insightful observer of the Israeli scene and Judaism in general. In a recent column, he notes that the early Zionists were anti-religious, at least partly because prominent orthodox rabbis were anti-Zionist. But David Ben-Gurion subsidized “a few hundred” Yeshiva students so they could spend their time studying rather than working or joining the military. Now, these “Torah-shielded parasites” ”constitute 13% of the entire yearly crop of those liable to the draft. Moreover, 65% of all Orthodox male citizens do not work at all and live on the public purse.”

However, a small group of nationalist religious Jews were also encouraged by Ben Gurion. This group has prospered as well, giving rise to Gush Emunim (“the Bloc of the Faithful’), “the ideological core of the settlement movement. Nowadays this camp is directed by Rabbis whose teachings emit a strong odor of Fascism.”

This trend toward fascism is more pronounced because these two religious groups have grown together ideologically over the years, so that “the two factions are very close to each other today and together constitute an Orthodox-national-religious bloc. Indeed, the Orthodox have now become much more nationalist: “The youngsters of the Orthodox faction are seduced by the nationalist melody, unlike their fathers, for whom Israel was just like any goyim-state to be milked.” (The latter comment on the mentality of diaspora Judaism, which would be seen as egregious anti-Semitism if written for an audience in the diaspora, presumably reflects the critique of diaspora Judaism common among secular Zionists of an older generation. [Avnery was born in 1923 and came to Palestine in 1933.])

Avnery sees this new religion as unprecedented in Jewish history: “The Jewish religion in Israel is a mutation of Judaism, a tribal, racist, extreme nationalist and anti-democratic creed.” I rather doubt this, on the basis of other work. For example, the premise of Shahak & Mezvinsky’s Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel is that this is exactly what traditional Judaism was, and this fits well with the group evolutionary strategy idea. See my summary here, p. 9ff. As they note, there are strong continuities between traditional Jewish communities and contemporary Jewish religious fundamentalism in Israel: “Present day fundamentalists attempt to re-create the life of Jewish communities before the Enlightenment (i.e., prior to about 1750).”...

Avnery notes that the Orthodox have 5-15 children per woman. As always, demography is destiny. Avery suggests that the government effect a separation of religion and state, but at this point that is a political impossibility. In the future, it will be even less of a possibility.

Absent external factors, the logical prediction is that the reality of Israel as a racialist, expansionist, religiously fanatic ethnostate will be more and more difficult to gloss over—even for the aggressively pro-Israel media and for politicians subservient to the Israel Lobby...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
Above: Ethnically cohesive Jewish Zionists on parade in Israel

Below: Ethnically cohesive Jewish Zionists and their corrupt Israel-first political stooges on parade in the U.S.
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

To me, it's obvious what happened with Nazism: Judeo-"Christian" Nazis simply evolved to mirror the Judeo-Bolshevik Communists, and the most sociopathic Aryans (plenty of them with more than a few drops of broiling Jewish blood running through their veins -- and hence Judeofascist inclinations) made their way to the top just as did the most sociopathic Bolsheviks. Being incapable of feeling guilt has its materialist and careerist advantages. But sociopaths make for an ignoble, dishonorable, unprincipled and unrefined leadership, as contemporary America demonstrates, as well -- hence the need for a strong Christian moral order in which nobility can rise to the top and vulgarians, Zionists, fascists, communists and other base thugs and sociopaths are kept in the gutter, where they belong.

Suborning treason?: Judeofascist Lieberman orders Israeli embassies across Europe to recruit thousands of local resident "allies" (aka operatives)

From:
Israel recruits citizen advocates in Europe
'Allies and friends' will promote government policy to press and public meetings as part of fresh PR drive

Israel has instructed its embassies in 10 European countries, including the UK, each to recruit 1,000 members of the public to act as advocates for its policies in a new public relations offensive.

A cable from the foreign affairs ministry was sent to embassies last week, with instructions from Avigdor Lieberman, the controversial and extreme right-wing foreign minister, to adopt a range of measures aimed at improving Israel's standing in Europe.

The most unusual was the order to identify up to 1,000 people by mid-January to act as "allies" to Israel. One source described them as "friends who are willing not just to receive messages but to actively promote these messages". These individuals – likely to be drawn from Jewish or Christian activists, academics, journalists and students – will be briefed regularly by Israeli officials and encouraged to speak up for Israel at public meetings or write letters or articles for the press.

Five European capitals have also been identified for a more conventional PR push. Israeli embassies in London, Paris, Berlin, Madrid and Rome will receive funds to hire professional PR firms and lobbyists...

Israel has previously launched drives to improve its image through hasbara – literally meaning explanation, although alternatively interpreted as public diplomacy, spin or propaganda. During its three-week war on Gaza, which began in December 2008, Israel launched a PR strategy through its national information directorate to co-ordinate key messages on a daily basis.

The Israeli government, military and various embassies are adept at using social media such as Twitter, Facebook and YouTube to promote material. Organisations such as Bicom, the Britain Israel Communications Research Centre, in the UK and the Israel Project in the US, which describe themselves as independent, are dedicated to promoting Israeli policies. Both organisations offer regular briefings, contacts and tours to foreign correspondents based in Israel and Palestine, and all-expenses paid trips to Israel for journalists, including from the Guardian, based elsewhere...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
Lieberman's Telefon fantasy: Israel's foreign minister, right-wing Judeofascist Avigdor Lieberman, has ordered Israeli embassies across Europe to immediately begin recruiting thousands of local "civilian" operatives who can be activated to advance the Zionist agenda

Reliably totalitarian Judeofascists have systematically (and profitably) implemented the authoritarian TSA airport regiment

From:
TSA’s Zionist Food Chain
(RealZionistNews.com) -- by Nathanael Kapner --

The verdicts are in: Judeofascists and their collaborators declare themselves "Not Guilty"

PART I

and

PART II

State propagandist National Public Radio keeps the "Persecuted Jewry" meme primed and flowing into the American body politic

From:
NPR’s Holocaust obsession
(Mondoweiss) -- by Henry Norr --

After waking up this morning to yet another Holocaust story on National Public Radio's Weekend Edition, I headed to npr.org's search page to check my impression that such stories been coming thick and fast lately. Narrowing my query to "Heard On Air" (excluding the blogs, Associated Press stories, and other things posted at the website), "Past Year," and "News" (the only NPR programs I regularly listen to), I found 20 stories, not including today's, that included the word "Holocaust." Comparing other historical phenomena with tragic consequences, I found 15 hits on the word "slavery," 11 on "native Americans," nine on "communism," five on "Rwanda genocide," one on "Armenian genocide," and one on "Ukrainian famine."

Suggestive as these results may be, such simple word searches don't get at the heart of the matter, because most of the hits are passing references within stories focused on current issues. But of the 21 stories that mention "Holocaust," six by my count were sustained, in-depth discussions of some aspect of the Nazi murder of the Jews more than 65 years ago: today's interview with an Israeli professor about his new book on one famous photograph from the Warsaw ghetto, an October 28 item on the role of German diplomats in the genocide, an August 28 piece on the Nazi Nuremberg laws, a July 23 analysis of the role of the French national railroad in the deportation of French Jews, an April 15 piece on the memories of American vets who helped liberate the Nazi concentration camps, and a March 9 segment entitled "Russian Village Haunted By A Hidden Holocaust Past."...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
NPR programming director spends one weekend a year volunteering as a drill instructor

Judeofascist spearheads of totalitarianism at it yet again: Jewish supremacists seek to re-define free speech as "hate speech"

From:
The ever-widening definition of ‘anti-Semitism’
(TheStar.com) -- by DENNIS IGNATIUS --

Revised definition of anti-Semitism could shield Israel from criticism and silence emerging Palestinian voices.

The second summit of the Inter-Parliamentary Coalition for Combatting Anti-Semitism (ICCA) concluded in Ottawa, Canada, earlier this month.

The summit, which was attended by parliamentarians from some 50 countries, discussed ways to combat what was described as “a dramatic increase in recorded anti-Semitic hate crimes ….”

The key outcome of the summit, however, proved to be controversial – a widening of the definition of anti-Semitism to encompass criticism of the state of Israel.

By arguing that the State of Israel is “the collective Jew,” criticism of the State of Israel could become, de facto, an anti-Semitic act punishable by law.

Independent Jewish Voices (IJV), a Jewish NGO committed to promoting a just resolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict, accused the ICCA of attempting to “silence international condemnation of Israeli human rights abuses and to criminalise criticism of Israeli misdeeds.”

Other groups concerned with protecting free speech also warned of “severe restrictions on freedom of expression” if the definition of anti-Semitism recommended by the ICCA is adopted.

The initiative to conflate criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism was first mooted at an earlier ICCA summit in London in February 2009 at a time when Israel was coming under intense international criticism for its actions during the Gaza war.

Since then, other developments have added to the pressure on Israel.

Last year saw the release of the Goldstone Report which accused both the Israeli Defence Forces and the Hamas leadership of committing war crimes as well as deliberately targeting civilians.

Israel rebuked Judge Goldstone, a South African Jew, and rejected the report as “distorted, falsified and not balanced.” Israel’s UN Ambassador remarked that the Goldstone report was “conceived in hate.”

Then in May, Israel suffered another public relations disaster when its troops killed nine members of an international flotilla attempting to break the Gaza blockade.

A subsequent UN Human Rights Council investigation concluded that the Israeli military broke international law by its disproportionate response and unacceptable level of brutality.

Again, Israel, as it now routinely does, dismissed all criticism of its actions as extremist and biased, implying that they were motivated more by anti-Semitic sentiment than anything else.

The ICCA appears to have developed upon this strategy.

There is also concern over the rising assertiveness of a new generation of Palestinians living abroad who are eloquent, western in outlook and better able to articulate their cry for justice.

They are beginning to emulate the successful methods of Jewish lobby groups in influencing public opinion and slowly challenging the distorted narrative of their struggle for freedom.

Their voices would be effectively silenced if it is now classified as hate speech.

At their London conference last year, the ICCA was also seized by what they called “illegal anti-Semitic discourse” on university campuses including calls for a boycott of Israel.

It is not inconceivable that even calling for a boycott of Israel might soon be considered hate speech as well.

Indeed, this is already happening – in September, the French government charged several activists with “incitement to racial hatred” for distributing leaflets calling for a boycott of Israel.

As one political commentator noted, “without a doubt, the main purpose of this redefinition of anti-Semitism is to create a serious chill on university campuses and in the media.”

Engaging in political activism and debate to influence public opinion and win support for their cause is one of the last legitimate forms of resistance left to Palestinians.

It is disingenuous to attempt to shut it down under the guise of combatting anti-Semitism.

Palestinians are, without a doubt, now fighting for their very survival.

They live under punishing and deplorable conditions, their lands progressively expropriated, their homes demolished to make way for more Jewish settlements, and even the most basic of human rights are denied them.

If it happened anywhere else, there would be outrage in Western capitals...MORE...LINK
------------------------

Following in Judeofascism's ideological footsteps, White Nationalists increasingly identify themselves as "White Zionists"

From:
Nagging Little Voices
(Occidental Dissent) -- by Hunter Wallace --

...In his latest episode of Radio Free Northwest, Harold Covington accused me of “running down the Northwest.” In reality, I have only criticized Covington and his implausible vanguardist scheme, which will only have the effect of making life even more uncomfortable for White Nationalists already living in the region.

There are many valid reasons for White Zionists to move to the Pacific Northwest. I have spent hours analyzing Wyoming and Idaho. Eventually, I plan to take a hard look at Washington, Oregon, Montana, and the Dakotas. I will complete my analysis with a regional summary.

Harold’s real gripe isn’t that I am “running down the Northwest.” It is that I have written positive reviews of the wrong Northwestern states. Namely, those where Harold Covington doesn’t live, which are excluded from his fantasy world.

White Zionists settling in Idaho and Wyoming could have a far bigger impact than they could in Washington or Oregon. Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota are smaller states than Idaho. Their impact would be even larger there.

There is nothing stopping White Zionists from taking over existing communities in the Interior West and creating communities where anti-White taboos are unenforceable. If they moved to Wyoming or Montana, they could demonstrate the potential of the White Zionist model. That would attract more recruits and the publicity necessary to fuel and sustain a real Northwest migration.

In his podcast, Harold Covington denounced the Ron Paul campaign. Ron Paul’s presidential campaign laid the foundation (through institutions like Young Americans for Liberty and Campaign for Liberty) for Rand Paul’s successful bid to become U.S. Senator from Kentucky.

Wyoming, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota are smaller than Oregon and Washington. Instead of 4 Senators, they send 10 to Washington. Wyoming has 2 Senators in spite of being 1/9th the size of Kentucky.

If the libertarians can succeed in Kentucky, the home of millions of “Red State Fascists,” why can’t White Nationalists succeed in Wyoming?

This migration plan is perfectly legal. It is not based on a wild fantasist scheme of a successful vanguardist insurrection. The vast majority of White Zionists are just looking for a place to settle down and live a White life.

The Nagging Little Voice

The “nagging little voice” says:

If I moved to Wyoming, Idaho, Montana, or the Dakotas, I could live a fairly decent life, pay less in taxes, own more property, and my kids would have Nordic classmates. I might find myself an attractive, conservative Nordic woman to marry and live with on my ranch or in my cabin in the woods. There would be no Jews or blacks to put up with.

I would be safe. I might have some actual political representation. If more people moved here, seeing how good we have it, we might even be able to live openly as White Nationalists.

Alternatively, I could move to Washington and join the Northwest Front, which would consist of me hanging out with Harold Covington and a few other alienated vanguardists all day. After getting a job, I would be constantly prodded to support “the movement,” which must have some financial base of support.

Any association with Covington might actually prevent me from acquiring employment. In the event I did move there and built up a nest egg, it could be wrecked at any moment by an unhinged fantasist going on a counterproductive shooting spree.

Maybe I ought to just move to the Pacific Northwest and enjoy living a quiet life there. If I want to hear what Harold Covington has to say, I could always listen to his podcast. That way I could enjoy all the benefits of the Pacific Northwest without the liability of having any dangerous affiliations...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
Top: White Nationalist/White Zionist Harold Covington's inner Judeofascist emerges in spades
Below: Unidentified Jewish Nationalist/Jewish Zionist

Left-Right statist-corporatist triangulation: Judeofascists Soros and Chertoff both profiteering on authoritarian government airport x-ray regiment

From:
Getting Rich from the TSA Naked Body Scanners
(The New American) -- by Raven Clabough --

With all the commotion over the invasiveness of the naked body scanners used by the United States Transportation Security Administration (TSA), one question that has been ignored is who is profiting from TSA’s use of the body scanners? Mark Hemingway and Tim Carney at The Examiner discovered the shameful answer: George Soros, Michael Chertoff, and a number of lobbyists.

Both Soros and Chertoff are profiting from the naked body scanners by way of the company Rapiscan, whose contract is worth $173 million. Lobbyists for this company include Susan Carr, a former senior legislative aide to Rep. David Price (D-N.C.) who is coincidentally chairman of the Homeland Security Subcommittee.

Former Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff was “flacking for Rapiscan,” writes Tim Carney of The Examiner:

After the undie-bomber attempt on Christmas 2009, Chertoff went on a media tour promoting the use of these scanners, without disclosing that he was getting paid by Rapiscan, one of the two companies currently contracted by TSA to take a nude picture of you at the airport.

Just days after the attempted Christmas attack, the New York Times explained:

Screening technologies with names like millimeter-wave and backscatter X-ray can show the contours of the body and reveal foreign objects. Such machines, properly used, are a leap ahead of the metal detectors used in most airports, and supporters say they are necessary to keep up with the plans of potential terrorists. "If they’d been deployed, this would pick up this kind of device," Michael Chertoff, the former homeland security secretary, said in an interview….

Another notable connection to Rapiscan is leftist billionaire George Soros, who owned 11,300 shares of OSI Systems, Inc., the company that owns Rapiscan. Nova Tea Party Patriots writes, “OSI’s stock has appreciated considerably over the course of the year.”

In response to The Examiner’s report of George Soros’ share in Rapiscan, Media Matters (another of Soros’ funded projects) seized on the report and mocked the writer. The Blaze reports that Media Matters argued that “11,300 shares are only ‘six one-hundredths of one percent’ of the company’s total stock.

However, once The Examiner reported that George Soros owned the shares of the OSI Systems, Soros coincidentally sold all 11,300 shares of the company...

Meanwhile, Rapiscan reportedly knows how to “play ball in Washington to increase its profits.” Facing obstacles related to dealing with homeland security, Rapiscan opened an office in Washington and hired a number of outside lobbyists and agency-specific federal marketing and sales staff, reports The Examiner. As a result, the company made $40 million in sales to the United States government, compared to $8 million in 2004...MORE...LINK

Case study: Steven Spielberg and the use of mass media propaganda to manipulate public opinion, rewrite history and advance the Judeofascist agenda

From:
Steven Spielberg: Body Snatcher–A Review of the Miniseries “Band of Brothers”
(The Occidental Observer) -- by Charles Dodgson --

In ten episodes, Band of Brothers depicts how E (“Easy”) Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne Division, trained in America and England and then fought from D-Day through to the end of the European phase of WWII. It is a technically strong and gripping production. The battle scenes are among the most realistic I have seen, though one must allow for the demands of the cinematic medium — emphasis of a few individuals and spatial compression of combat groups. I am reminded of the grim and gritty street battle sequences in Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan. This review looks at the ninth episode, which does not depict military conflict but is itself something of a black operation in the culture wars.

As our own Edmund Connelly has repeatedly demonstrated, Jewish interests have frequently been pushed by American television and Hollywood films in various ways, often as a backdrop to stories unrelated to ethnicity, like the omnipresent upper class Anglo twit and the Black genius technical expert. The 9th episode of Band of Brothers, titled “Why We Fight”, represents an unprecedented level of ambition — to claim America’s WWII sacrifices as motivated by the desire to save Jews from Nazi persecution, to make America’s sacrifice in WWII all about the Jews, not about Americans doing their duty in a tragic internecine conflict.

The episode opens with a scene of devastation in the German town of Thalem, on April 11, 1945. There is rubble in the streets and townspeople are cleaning up. A group of relaxed G.I.s looks on from a balcony. An impromptu chamber orchestra of old men is playing a Beethoven dirge.

Then a flash-back: “One month earlier, Sturzelberg, Germany”. The war is as good as over. The Wehrmacht has given up the fight. Roosevelt’s death is announced. There are scenes of looting by officers and men; of a soldier having sex with an enthusiastic blond German girl; of drinking. The bridge over the Rhine at Remagen is announced captured.

The company is still under orders, though the men are beginning to think about life back in the States. The company moves out in convoy. A Jewish G.I. — the only Jewish soldier in the series and in the book — talks about his plans for after the war. “I’m going to find a nice Jewish girl.”

Masses of German POWs march by in orderly ranks. An officer says admiringly that even in defeat the Germans look like soldiers. But the Jewish G.I. sees nothing but objects of hate and contempt, standing up in the vehicle and screaming: “You stupid fascist pigs. . . . You ignorant, servile scum!” This displays a sophisticated vocabulary for someone who we are told in the final episode went back to driving taxis after the War. The scene does not occur in Ambrose’s book.

The company drives past a scene of summary executions of three uniformed Germans, who are kicked out of a building, made to kneel, then unceremoniously shot in the head, blood spraying. Their killers then begin to go through pockets. The killers are also uniformed but are not Americans or British. Perhaps Czech troops. The troops of Easy Company are shocked by the murders. They look down grimly, except for the Jewish G.I., who smiles.

A patrol in a forest near Landsberg in Bavaria discovers a concentration camp full of starving prisoners. (A 21-minute clip, including the concentration camp material, is available here.) The 101st did in fact liberate a camp in the area. The Jewish G.I. is the company’s translator. He translates the words of an inmate being interviewed by the commander. This is a work camp for Jews, pause, and Gypsies. The scene in Ambrose’s book does not mention Jews or Gypsies. It is described as a work camp (pp. 262–263).

German civilians in the local town deny any knowledge of the camp but they are not believed by the G.I.s. Food is requisitioned from the local town, from a bakery. We see a fat baker complaining as his entire stock is removed without explanation or payment. In Ambrose’s book there is no such character. Instead an officer finds a store of cheese and has it distributed to the camp inmates without incident (p. 262). The fat baker is an exemplary propaganda construct of the cheapest Hollywood films. His jiggling neck and self righteous possessiveness stands for all German civilians in the town who, we are led to assume, must have known of the camp. It is implied that they remained knowingly well fed while the Jews starved. An officer threatens the baker with his pistol and accuses him of knowing about the camp. The baker’s unpleasant appearance is another example of Spielberg using hackneyed propaganda technique. It is not enough that a person do wrong. He must also wear a black hat and waxed mustachio...MORE...LINK

Smirking oligarch Steven Spieldberg, (top) pictured here with his Jewish media cohorts David Geffen (left) and Jeffrey Katzenberg, has systematically advanced the Zionist agenda by using mass media propaganda to portray ethnocentric Jewry as victimized and heroic when in reality it's racist and predatory as epitomized by Jewish Bolshevism, Zionism and Neoconservatism. -- C.M.

Is parasitic Judeofascism's free ride on the backs of average Americans finally coming to an end?

From:
‘NYT’ warns that US support for Israel may become ‘politicized’
(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

The New York Times has done a good thing today by putting AIPAC on its front page in a piece that says that Israel was "one of the big winners" of the midterm elections, due to the elevation of Republicans who support Netanyahu's hellbent course.

The encouraging news in the piece, on the front page, is the statement that Kentucky Senator-elect Rand Paul might take a stand against aid to Israel, he has already said as much to AIPAC. This threat is quickly countered by Chuck Schumer:

“One of the first things Congressman [Eric] Cantor can do is to make sure that his colleagues vote for aid to Israel,” said Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, who also met with Mr. Netanyahu.

Mr. Schumer and others worry that support for Israel in Congress, long a bipartisan article of faith, could become politicized in a way that will end up harming Israel’s interests.

So: American support for Israel might be "politicized." I.e., the American people would then get to debate the issue, rather than face wall to wall support among their leaders, enforced by fatcat lobbyists with access. And journalists would have to write about the lobby, as they write about the gun lobby, the anti-abortion movement, or any other ideological special interest.

Though the Times reporters, Mark Landler and Jennifer Steinhauer, are typically close-mouthed about the character of that special interest. They speak of Eric Cantor's devotion to the Jewish state without saying anything about his recent pledge of allegiance to Netanyahu over Obama; maybe they should have described Schumer's genuflection to AIPAC, when he declared that he is Israel's guardian, in Hebrew. God forbid it should say a word about the religion of Schumer, Cantor, or Robert Wexler, who all play tambourines and speak in tongues in this report...MORE...LINK

Depraved, Zionist mainstream media: Majority of corrupt, hack journalist in MSM are Jewish

From:
Mamas, dont let your boychicks grow up to be pundits
(Mondoweiss) -- by Bruce Wolman --

You have to hand it to Hebrew School. What a training ground those late weekday sessions have shown to be.

Salon produced its Hack Thirty List-- "our all-star team--of the most predictable, dishonest and just plain stupid pundits in the media"--and by my reckoning at least 16 of the 30 are Jewish. Even more impressive, Jews occupy the first five, and six out of the first seven, positions on the list. It's a complete rout, dear Gentiles.

Congratulations to Richard Cohen of the Washington Post, who beat out Mark Halperin, Tom Friedman, David Broder, Marty Peretz and Jonah Goldberg for the top honors. Poor Jeffrey Goldberg came in only at number 26. Just shows how tough the competition was.

I am wondering whether the Jewish Weekly, the Forward, and Ha'aretz will write this up. They usually never fail to notice such honors...MORE...LINK

When racial profiling is instituted by Zionist Jewry, suddenly Jewish-dominated, liberal establishment media love the idea

From:
TSA Screwing Up Airport Security? Turn to Israel (NOT)
(Tikun Olam) -- by Richard Silverstein --

Why can’t the U.S. be more like Israel?

I’d like to do a forensic search to root out the origin of the latest media meme that, given the mess that TSA appears to be making of the new full body airport security screenings, we should turn to Israel as a model for how to do the job. Chances are that we’ll discover that the meme was created by someone in the MFA or by an Israeli security consultant who stands to make millions if TSA takes the idea seriously enough to hire him.

Everyone from CNN to Reuters, to the august N.Y. Times has taken up the idea:

Amid the uproar that airport screening has become too intrusive, some Americans are now asking why the United States cannot do it like the Israelis.

Representative John L. Mica, Republican of Florida and a critic of the Obama administration’s new screening methods, says the Transportation Security Administration should look at Israel, which uses early detection techniques at airports. An editorial in The Washington Times last week praised El Al, the Israeli national airline, as employing the “smarter approach” of using “sophisticated intelligence analysis which allows them to predict which travelers constitute a possible threat and which do not.”...

...Why can’t the U.S. be more like Israel? Oh, I don’t know, maybe because we’re a democracy and take civil liberties seriously and Israel winks and nods at the notion. Maybe because we know enough about racial and ethnic profiling to reject the notion especially when you establish it at the core of a nation’s airline screening process. Maybe because we have a more balanced, nuanced understanding of the conflicting requirements of national security and individual liberty.

Here is a short summary of the posts I’ve written extolling the professionalism of Israeli airport security. There was the case of the Alvin Ailey American African American dancer separated from her company due to her skin color. The U.S. university president and former cabinet officer of Lebanese descent (yup, her name gave her away as an Arab terrorist) traveling to Israel to speak against BDS; the Hebrew University professor on her way to an academic conference until forced to part with her laptop. Or the award-winning Israeli-Palestinian documentary filmmaker forced to strip naked by El Al security apparently because her award, bestowed by no less a personage than George Clooney, made her a terrorism suspect. The American university professor on her way to an Israeli academic conference until called a terrorist by El Al security (she was likely confused with another person with the same name, who wrote in her online bio that as a child she lived in poor Pakistani and Iranian villages); or how about the daughter of the Israeli Supreme Court justice who herself was an Israel foreign ministry trainee harassed at the airport while being Arab; or the case of the American family refused exit from Israel for no more reason than that they didn’t have proper papers acknowledging they were Palestinian, when none of the detained children or mother were Palestinian (the father, who was not with them when detained was Palestinian); Not to mention the individuals prevented from entering Israel for no security reason whatsoever aside from their undesirable political views opposing the Israeli Occupation. Then there was the woman who had had a “dangerous” slogan stickered on her laptop, which earned it three bullets through the hard-drive. And oh man, if you’re a Harvard Law student doing academic research on land disputes between the Bedouin and Israeli government, don’t even think about it. And finally, we have the case of El Al security in South Africa demanding to search a dark-skinned airport visitor who wasn’t even flying...MORE...LINK
-------------------------
Neo-Pharisees tighten the noose: Jewish Zionists like former Homeland Security czar Michael Chertoff (above left) are profiteering nicely by importing draconian Israeli "national security" methods to America. Integral to the Zionist agenda, the Jewish-dominated, statist-liberal Establishment mainstream media paper the entire Judeofascist police state process over by glorifying Israel and its pharisaic ways as shining examples for America to follow. Looks like treasonous, Establishment Big Government "conservatives" and "liberals" have finally found something they can whole-heartedly agree upon: anti-American and anti-Christian Jewish supremacism. -- C.M.

With history closing in on truth, Zionists and their corrupt political stooges go on desperate, all-out offensive against 9/11 "conspiracy theorists"

From:
Friends of Israel — Enemies Inside the Gates
(YouTube.com) -- by alawson911 --

Zionist psychology, tactics and modes of thought have been transplanted into the American consciousness by...who?

From:
The Israelification of America
(War in Context) -- by Paul Woodward --

As the Transportation Security Administration faces a barrage of criticism, some indignant Americans are calling for the “Israelification” of US airports — as though the security procedures used in a tiny Middle Eastern ethnocracy with one international airport could easily be scaled up for America.

Ironically, Israelification is not what we need — it’s what we already have.

Consider the real outrages of the last decade that, simply because they were done in the name of national security, the majority of Americans found tolerable:

--a global war on terrorism that led to massive increases in defense spending, the creation of multiple new intelligence and security agencies, and Washington’s enslavement to fear-based politics — that was OK;
--with disregard for international law, the invasion of Iraq on a false pretext — that was OK;
--the kidnapping, secret imprisonment and torture of individuals most of whom had nothing to do with 9/11 — that was OK;
--the authorization of warrantless wiretaps — that was OK;
--the implementation of a remote-controlled assassination program — that was OK;
--in short, the normalization of war crimes all of which were deemed justifiable because of 9/11 — that was OK;
--but “don’t touch my junk” — there are limits to what Americans will tolerate...

Which brings me back to my initial claim that the Israelification of America is already deeply entrenched. Israel’s fear of the Arab world has been transplanted into American consciousness to such a degree that we are moving toward the absurd conclusion that if this country operated even more like Israel than it already does, then we would be able to feel as safe as the Israelis do...MORE...LINK

Satist-liberals hate traditional Christians but love Jewry and defend pharisaic Judeofascist Zionism; why is that?

From:
Huffpo gives platform to Israel lobbyist’s claim based on 3000-year-old artifacts
(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

Marty Kaplan at Huffpo: "I take Israel personally." Further proof that the left is permeated by the Israel lobby. Further proof that Zionism has produced a giant IQ drop in what I grew up thinking were the smartest people in the country. Note that Kaplan hadn't been to Israel in 40 years till he visited lately; but he regards the wall there as his wall. And note the 3000-year-old artifacts of Jewish civilization Kaplan sees at the Israel Museum that combined with genealogical records at the Holocaust museum justify Zionist land claims for him and the rest of the "Jewish people."

If Christians said this kind of stuff, Huffpo would scream that they are religious nuts...MORE...LINK
--------------------------
Precursors to the Christian-hating Jewish Marxists who conjured Communism and the Jewish Zionists who revel in ethnically cleansing Palestinian Christians, the Judeofascist Pharisees (above) plot to strangle Christianity in the cradle.Karl Marx (above) looking suspiciously kin to the Pharisees. Leading Israeli Rabbi Yosef (below) says non-Jews are put on earth as beasts of burden to labor for Jews like donkeys.

Clever Ashkenazi Jewish elite try to scapegoat "crude" Russian Jews as carriers of virulent racism--but it’s the Zionism, stupid

From:
Israel’s ashkenazi elite, not Russian immigrants, are responsible for the country’s ever increasing racism
(Mondoweiss) -- by Gabriel Ash --

Before syphilis was baptized with its modern name, it used to be called the "French disease" in Italy, Poland and Germany, the "Italian disease" in France, the "Spanish disease" in the Netherlands, the “Polish disease” in Russia and the “Christian disease” in Istanbul. Something quite similar appears to be today the fate of overt racism. Bad people always seem to be bringing it from elsewhere. For some unfathomable reason nobody wants to claim ownership.

Thus, of all places in Israel, Yossi Gurvitz informs us that “disregard of human rights, contempt for democracy and the democratic process, and rampant racism towards 'uncivilized people', such as Asians or Muslims” are symptoms of the Soviet system, the portrait of a homo sovieticus...

Russian immigrants do hold more authoritarian and racist news than average Jewish Israelis, but what Gurvitz does with facts such as this is crude. He presents a one tone stereotype of a “Lieberman voter.” Do really people vote for Lieberman because they are “isolated from the outside world?” Do issues of class, resource allocation, power and identity have nothing to do with that vote? Then he attributes that caricature to “the soviet system.” Is “blind acceptance of claims made by authority” really the result of living under the soviet system? I was born in a communist country, and the people I know took from the experience a general belief that claims made by state authorities are lies. Perhaps I am not as well informed about Soviet life as Gurvitz. Finally, he asserts that these racist attitudes inherent in Russians made Israel more racist, a very questionable claim. What motivates Gurvitz’s anger?

Gurvitz assures us that he knows all about Israel’s history. Unfortunately he shows little effort to draw insight from this knowledge. Let us begin with the end: Gurvitz says that “there is something exceptionally loathsome in an émigré whose politics are based on the idea of expelling the native population.”

Israel exists by virtue of Jews arriving from Europe and expelling the native population. Granted that what Lieberman is proposing is loathsome, how is it exceptionally loathsome relative to the very foundation of Israel and its continuing refusal to allow the return of the expelled Palestinians? Were not the Palmach troops composed of and led by émigrés? Isn’t the very expression of “exceptional” outrage here a mean to normalize and naturalize the original outrage?

The expulsion of 1948 is not only the foundational act of Israel’s creation. Crucially, it is the foundation of the distribution of wealth in Israel. By and large, Israelis possess wealth to the extent that they or their families were close to this act of original dispossession. The wealthiest, most powerful, most connected Israelis, which Gurvitz identifies, following Kimmerling, as “ahusalim” (secular Ashkenazi veteran socialist nationalists), were those whose families directly profited from the expulsion. The domination of this group over other subordinated groups was and is based on the control of the resources primarily grabbed through that expulsion...

Supporting white Ashkenazi (ahusalim, if one prefers) domination in Israel, in addition to having no moral justification, is, to the extent that the past is any indication, a recipe for further disaster. That is a good reason why the racialization of “fascism” in Israel as a Soviet import that Gurvitz offers as analysis should be politely turned down...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

Actually, it's the Judeofascism, stupid.

The writing is on the wall; the "post-Christian," pseudo-secular Judeofascist order is increasingly in disarray...fraying, crumbling, and on the verge of collapse...and when it goes, it will take its corrupt, Zionist-complicit, statism-exploiting Left-Right Goy collaborators, who together have plundered America and the West and steered them straight into the ground, right down to the bottom with it.

Good riddance, but what will emerge in its place? A return to the traditional Christian moral order that built Western civilization, or some variation thereof, seems to be on deck.

Time for the warmongering Judeofascists and their degenerate, materialism-worshipping Goy partners in crime to go back underground and into the sewers, where they belong.

As world grows wise to their ways, "compassionate" mask comes off and Judeofascists step up their violence--now even in America

From:
The Pogromists at Stand With Us
(Tikun Olam) -- by Richard Silverstein --

The bullies who stand with Stand With Us are developing ever more belligerent, assaultive behavior in their jihad against the pro-peace movement. Last week at one of its regular meetings, members of Jewish Voice for Peace were confronted with a number of hecklers who were also attempting to videotape the meeting against the express wishes of JVP. I’m going to let JVP explain what happened:

…Up to a dozen members of San Francisco Voice for Israel/StandWithUs, a right-wing Israeli advocacy group with a documented track record of aggressively taunting and intimidating grassroots peace activists, attended a Bay Area Jewish Voice for Peace community meeting at a South Berkeley Senior Center.

…Wrapped in an Israeli flag, San Francisco Voice for Israel/StandWithUs (SFVI/SWU) member Robin Dubner, an Oakland based attorney, pepper-sprayed two JVP members in the eyes and face after they attempted to nonviolently block her ability to aggressively videotape the faces of JVP meeting attendees against their will. The members, Alexei Folger and Glen Hauer, were careful to make no physical contact with her or her camera prior to the attack.

Folger said, “I did not see it coming and all of a sudden there was gooey stuff all over my head and hand. I have never been pepper-sprayed before, my whole head felt like it was on fire.”

[At an earlier JVP street protest last June]…Caught on a widely seen videotape was a SFVI/SWU supporter pointing his camera to the faces of silent peace vigil participants while saying “You’re all being identified, every last one of you…we will find out where you live. We’re going to make your lives difficult. We will disrupt your families…”

For that reason, JVP members were particularly concerned about protecting the safety of meeting attendees and preventing the videotaping...

...Americans for Peace Now and Meretz USA have denounced this attack. No word yet on when JVP will hear from the ADL or even J Street. Yes, yes, I know naysayers will say that these assaults are the acts of aberrant personalities who don’t represent the mainstream Jewish community or even Stand With Us. But look, Stand With Us is a deliberately confrontational organization. Perhaps Roz Rothstein or Rob Jacobs won’t douse anyone with pepper spray but clearly a significant number of their members will. And they either cannot or will not control them.

This behavior is not exclusive to the Bay Area either. Here in Seattle, SWU board member David Brumer (he was even on the board of my shul at the time) wrote in an e mail to me that I should be spanked for my views. Brumer works as the geriatric social worker at the Kline-Galland Home, Seattle’s Jewish home for the aged. Neither the leadership of the Jewish community nor his employer finds anything untoward with Brumer’s verbally assaultive behavior.

Stand With Us plays an honored role in the Israel discourse in Seattle. At the Operation Cast Lead local community meeting, SWU’s Nevet Basker made the main presentation. Included on the Jewish federation’s Israel committee is Stand With Us. This is the same committee that organized the anti-Iran program last October at which the Israeli consul general and an Aipac flack with no experience dealing with Iran, spoke. They bring their dog and pony shows to Hebrew schools, synagogues, Hillels and universities with IDF veterans telling American Jews that Palestinians force them to kill them against their will. Stand With Us organizes gay tours to Israel to promote the notion that Israel is a paradise for gays–all this in order to juxtapose the supposed homophobia of Muslim countries...MORE...LINK

Imposed, degrading TSA regiment yet another example of society turned upside down by political Zionism to advance totalitarian Judeofascist interests

From:
Chertoff’s TSA Death Scanners
(RealZonistNews.com) -- by Nathanael Kapner --

From Cantor to Kagan, is it possible for U.S. Jewish nationalists to put America first? Not really

From:
Eric Cantor’s Loyalty
(Occidental Observer) -- by Kevin MacDonald --

It’s a good sign that Rep. Eric Cantor’s pledge of allegiance to Israel has raised eyebrows. Cantor, who will soon be Marjority Leader in the House, released a statement that

“the new Republican majority will serve as a check on the Administration and what has been, up until this point, one party rule in Washington.” “He made clear that the Republican majority understands the special relationship between Israel and the United States, and that the security of each nation is reliant upon the other.”

Philip Weiss links to several commentators who were rather amazed that Cantor seemed to think it appropriate that the Republicans in the House would be making US foreign policy. Perhaps the most vitriolic comment is by Mark Perry at Foreign Policy who lumps Cantor’s statement in with the abject behavior of the Obama administration in offering Israel billions of dollars worth of military hardware in exchange for continuing a partial settlement freeze for three (3!) more months. Perry reviews a number of other recent examples of groveling before the Israel Lobby, and even sees fit to mention Elena Kagan’s testimony during her confirmation hearings:

When Elena Kagan testified during her confirmation hearings for the Supreme Court, she cited Israel jurist Aharon Barak as her model, because he was the “John Marshall of the State of Israel.” Kagan might well be a brilliant justice [I doubt it], but I would have thought she would cite Marshall as her model. Reminded that Barak was a judicial activist (and therefore not necessarily acceptable for some committee members), Kagan gave a ready explanation: “Israel means a lot to me,” she explained. Enough said.

Actually, there’s much more to be said about it. Her statement of ethnic commitment to a foreign country and her idealization of an Israeli jurist speak volumes. A reasonable inference is that her ethnic loyalty would trump disinterested application of legal principles. Would she recuse herself in a case involving spying for Israel? What about immigration policy, given that liberal immigration policy is a cornerstone commitment of the organized Jewish community?

But Kagan’s extraordinary statement did not prevent her from being confirmed, and Cantor’s statement has generally not resulted in accusations that his ethnic background may be influencing his attitudes. Only Philip Weiss broached the loyalty issue:

And the reason it’s vital to talk about [Cantor's dual loyalty] now is that you can’t unpack the disastrous American decision to invade Iraq or the push now to go to war with Iran (or indeed the unending support for Israeli colonization of the West Bank, or the defeat of the right of return in the 40s and 50s when American presidents were demanding the return of the refugees) without talking about the lobby and the construction of Jewish identity.

...MORE...LINK
------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

The Marxists, institutional multi-culturalists, left-liberals, and neocons made a massive error by using innately particularistic Jewry as the spearhead of their ideologies for a couple of different reasons. 1) Jewry is so haughty, self-serving and imperious, it thinks it should be granted special consideration and privileges in any and all cases, including the most blatantly treasonous, which 2) makes informed observers wonder if all minorities are going to be so tribal, selfish and even traitorous once they get a firm toe-hold as has Jewry. If they’re even half as obnoxious as Jewry, then that will be far too much, and enough to sink the country.

Others may disagree, but I believe the American experiment can still be salvaged if we quickly and aggressively suppress the Zionists, who set incredibly bad examples and poison the well for everyone, as is their particularistic nature and modus-vivendi.
-----
Institutional Jewish supremacy, coming to America? Elena Kagan: cites Jewish Zionist jurists as her legal role models

Typical of ethnocentric Jewry, Chomsky refuses to acknowledge organized Jewish volition, accountability, or culpability for...anything

From:
Q: Does Chomsky feel Jewish responsibility for Israel’s crimes?
(Mondoweiss) -- by Philip Weiss --

Here is a great interview of the great Chomsky by David Samuels at Tablet, thoroughly exploring the roots of Chomsky's ethnic/religious identification, which I think is largely unconscious for him. Samuels is uniquely positioned to do this, he comes out of an institutional-religious background; and so does Chomsky. I excerpt some of the religious-roots exchange below.

I am going to leave out the Walt and Mearsheimer question, you can find it at the link. It angries up my blood (as Dizzy Dean said of fried food); in essence you have two ethnocentric Jews saying that Jews lack agency in American government, and had nothing to do with the decision to destroy Iraq, no that was Lockheed Martin and Intel and Goldman, Sachs, see, that's how power works. As readers here know, I ascribe a huge part of the blame to neoconservative Jewish thinkers; and the neoconservatism is all over the liberal Jewish community because of Israel; and we can't begin to undo the damage till we look at the role of Zionism in Jewish life.

To his credit, Samuels understands the issue of Jewish responsibility when it comes to Israel; and I am going to first quote his last questions, well-feathered arrows that expose Chomsky's lack of reflective capacity here. Samuels:

When you speak about Israeli crimes, do you feel that you have a special responsibility to speak out as someone who comes from a specific Jewish tradition, or do you simply speak as an American?

I love Chomsky; he is Mount Rainier. But notice how Chomsky doesn't really address the question. It doesn't seem like he even can. Wow. And then Samuels persists and still Chomsky doesn't touch it:

There are many factors, as always. A sufficient factor is that the United States is responsible. But of course there’s a lot more. Background. Childhood. Emotional connections. Friends. All sorts of things. But they’re kind of irrelevant to the fundamental issue, those personal things. The fundamental issue is quite simple: Every U.S. taxpayer is responsible for Israeli crimes. They can’t carry them out without the decisive military, economic, ideological, and diplomatic support of the United States. The United States destroyed Iraq. Of course that should be harshly condemned. In fact I do it much more than I talk about Israel. In the case of the Vietnam war, we basically destroyed three countries. They’ll never recover. Same with Nicaragua. Same with Cuba. Go on and on. Same with Chile. That’s what we ought to be concentrating on. Israel happens to be a subcase of a larger problem. And yes, for me personally, it’s additional things.

...So Chomsky distinguishes between his "personal background," which he admits is part of his gestalt, and the real moral factors in human history, i.e., the United States. Are Jews the bad guy of the occupation? Samuels has asked. No, the United States is, is the answer. I believe that Roger Cohen and Tom Friedman have done better here just by saying, Israel's conduct makes me ashamed as a Jew. Chomsky seems unable to ascribe power to Jews as Jews, or even really to talk about such attachment. And in that "personal" dismissal, every "personal" element of Jewish energy on behalf of Zionism goes out the window, from Eddie Jacobson getting into his friend Truman's office to lobby him, Chuck Schumer screaming that the People of Israel live, Weizmann pressing Balfour after giving the English the invention of acetone to fight World War I, Louis Brandeis converting to Zionism before he got on the Supreme Court, Herzl going to the Ottoman court and dangling debt relief and PR work on your Armenia problem in the European press in exchange for Palestine. None of it matters. It's Lockheed Martin...MORE...LINK

Israel the likely genesis of vast, international organ-trafficking ring that preys upon impoverished from Eastern Europe to Brazil

From:
Seven Charged in Kosovo Organ-Trafficking Ring
(New York Times) -- by DAN BILEFSKY --

PRAGUE — At least seven people have been charged with participating in an international organ-trafficking network based in Kosovo that sold kidneys and other organs from impoverished victims for up to $200,000 to patients from as far away as Israel and Canada, police and senior European Union officials said Monday.

According to the indictment, the traffickers lured people from slums in Istanbul, Moscow, Moldova and Kazakhstan with promises of up to $20,000 for their organs. Law enforcement officials say many never received a cent. The operations were performed at a private clinic in a run-down neighborhood on the outskirts of Pristina, the Kosovar capital.

While the ring was first discovered two years ago, the global scale of the network and its victims is only now becoming clear...

Western law enforcement officials said they suspected the ring might be part of a larger criminal network whose nexus was in Israel. In September, five doctors from South Africa were charged with participating in an international kidney-trading syndicate in which dozens of poor Brazilians and Romanians were paid for kidneys for wealthy Israelis. Analysts said the organ-trafficking case was part of a disturbing global trend in which unscrupulous traffickers take advantage of the growing waiting lists of desperate patients and the vulnerability of poor people further buffeted by the international financial crisis...MORE...LINK
------------------------
Orphaned child from Moldovan slums: fair game to Judeofascist organ traffickers

How Judeofascists pass their work days: Litigation unmasks AIPAC as kinky, pornographic, hothouse

From:
AIPAC Gets Down and Dirty in Pushback Against Rosen Defamation Suit
(Forward) -- by Nathan Guttman --

Washington — The espionage case against two senior officials of the pro-Israel lobby in Washington was dropped last year. But it has not been forgotten, and is now threatening to draw the lobby into new depths of mudslinging.

Papers filed in the civil lawsuit of former lobbyist Steve Rosen against his previous employers at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee include mutual accusations of using pornographic material at the lobby headquarters, among other allegations. The papers, based on depositions taken from Rosen and from AIPAC principles, dig into the private lives of the involved parties. They also reveal in detail the close ties AIPAC officials held with Israeli diplomats based in Washington.

“After reading this stuff you feel like you need to wash your hands,” said one pro-Israel activist after skimming through the 260-page document, which is laced with graphic descriptions and invasive personal details. He declined to be named, out of a desire to avoid involvement in the case.

At issue is Rosen’s $20 million defamation lawsuit against his previous employers at AIPAC, who fired him and his colleague Keith Weissman in 2005 — several months after both had been indicted under a rarely used espionage statute because they allegedly received and passed on classified information. AIPAC, in a move that could be seen as meant to embarrass Rosen, revealed in its court filings extensive parts of the depositions, many of them dealing directly with Rosen’s personal life...

AIPAC claims that Rosen, who was director of foreign policy issues at the lobby and one of its most senior and well-known employees, had engaged in viewing pornography on AIPAC computers at the lobby’s Washington offices. Partial transcripts of the lengthy videotaped deposition of Rosen, which were made public as part of AIPAC’s motion, show Rosen admitted to surfing pornographic websites from work. But AIPAC’s lawyers insisted on more details.

“Q: What type of pornography?
A: Sexual pornography.
Q: What type? Man on man, man on woman?
A: Anything. Anything that occurred to me.”

Rosen also added more details than, perhaps, the attorney for AIPAC had bargained for.

“I witnessed [AIPAC executive director] Howard Kohr viewing pornographic material, [Kohr’s secretary] Annette Franzen viewing pornographic material, probably a dozen other members of the staff,” Rosen said in his deposition. He added that, according to a Nielsen survey, more than a quarter of Americans regularly view pornographic websites at their workplace.

Later in his deposition, the former lobbyist also said he had heard from directors at AIPAC about their visits to prostitutes and he claimed executive director Kohr had routinely used “locker room language” at the AIPAC offices.

AIPAC did not seem deterred from getting dragged into a dirty debate. It also chose to include in its court filing an issue relating to Rosen’s personal life with only a vague connection to the lobby’s claim regarding Rosen’s actions being below AIPAC’s standards. AIPAC’s lawyers questioned Rosen in detail about his attempts to find male sexual companions through Craigslist, an act Rosen referred to as “sexual experimentations.” This information came up in one of Rosen’s divorce cases — he has been married five times — and was supposed to remain under court seal...MORE...LINK
-----

Related: Founder of "progressive" Zionist-front, Southern Poverty Law Center, has some interesting pass times with his Jewish play mates

-----

In "Puppetmaster," Beck portrays Soros as extraordinarily diabolical, yet his politics align squarely with mainstream Judeofascist lefties

Glenn Beck was accused of anti-Semitism for singling out the Jewish George Soros as the ultimate "Puppetmaster"; in truth, Soros' chameleon neolib/neocon machinations and political stances are par for the course amongst two-faced, self-seving Judeofascist lefties -- and their neocon cousins, as well
--------------------------

From:
Glenn Beck on George Soros
(Occidental Obverver) -- by Kevin MacDonald --

...Essentially, Beck is making Soros into the main figure behind the current financial crisis and the movement to devalue the dollar. This is an oversimplification. Soros will doubtless position himself to benefit from how the crisis plays out (as he has always done and as Beck is counseling his audience to do). But I have never seen any evidence that Soros was the prime mover of the financial fraud and mismanagement that caused the financial crisis or that he is the main force behind the Fed’s policy of quantitative easing designed to devalue the dollar.

Beck foresees a possible complete meltdown far worse than the present malaise. Blaming it on one person is certainly effective rhetorically. It simplifies the problem for his audience by allowing them to focus on one person as the source of all the problems.

In his show and on his website, Beck emphasizes that Soros is a Jew (although under pressure he later saidthat Soros being Jewish is irrelevant to his behavior and that he (Beck) is more pro-Jewish and pro-Israel than Soros). Beck dwells quite a bit on Soros’ wartime experience (much to the consternation of the ADL), the ostensible point being that Soros has never shown any guilt about his behavior and indeed seems to have valued his experience—“the happiest year of his life.” The implication is that Soros is a sociopath willing to turn on his own people: He learned that by hiding his own identity as a Jew, he could gain power and survive...

The Beck website quotes extensively from Connie Bruck’s New Yorker portraitof Soros which notes that Soros has accepted an identity as a Jew (“I am ready to stand up and be counted [as a Jew]”). Further indicating his strong sense of Jewish identity, in a New York Review of Books articleSoros stated “I have a great deal of sympathy for my fellow Jews and a deep concern for the survival of Israel.

However, Soros claims to oppose Jewish tribalism: “I am escaping the particular. I think I am doing exactly that by espousing this universal concept” — of open society. “In other words, I don’t think that you can ever overcome anti-Semitism if you behave as a tribe… the only way you can overcome it is if you give up the tribalness.”

Soros’ solution to anti-Semitism, therefore, is to retain a Jewish identity but to end Jewish tribalism—a questionable proposal given how closely linked Jewish identity is to the idea of collective Jewish interests. Would he advocate dismantling the ADL? Dismantle AIPAC? Throughout history Jewish identity, whether religious or not, has always implied a sense of collective interests; Jewish groups have always felt a connection and sense of common interests with Jews in other countries.

Further, Jewish commitment to leftist universalism has always been accompanied by strong Jewish identities (see here, p. 80ff)—hence the finding that Jewish support for leftist causes waxed and waned depending on whether they were seen as satisfying Jewish interests. Beck makes much of the fact that Soros’ father was an Esperanto-speaking radical—in other words, a member of the very mainstream Jewish subculture of the left that was the most important Jewish subculture of 20th century. Leftist Jews were “attracted to radical political solutions that would transform the economic and political basis of society and would also be consistent with the continuity of Judaism” (p. 81). Universalist ideologies of the left “function as a secular form of Judaism” (p. 87).

Soros’ behavior fits entirely into the mainstream of contemporary Diaspora Judaism in the West—a strategy designed to decrease the power and influence of the White European majority of America. Contra Beck, it’s hard to see Soros as a uniquely powerful, indispensable funder of the left. His leftist activism is no different from the activism of a host of well-funded explicitly Jewish organizations like the ADL or de facto Jewish organizations (because of Jewish funding) like the SPLC. His political involvement reflects the political stance of the great majority of American Jews, 83% of whom voted for Obama and support progressive causes. Indeed, the organized Jewish community has not only been the most important force in ending the European bias of American immigration laws, it has assiduously courted alliances with non-White ethnic groups, including Blacks, Latinos, and Asians overwhelmingly aligned with the Democratic Party. Like Soros, the American Jewish community opposes any indication of White racial or ethnic consciousness while also supporting organizations like La Raza that promote the ethnic consciousness and interests of non-Whites.

When it comes to Israel, it has recently been revealed that Soros is a major funder of J Street, the relatively dovish pro-Israel lobbying group. This could mean that Soros is less hypocritical than the vast majority of American Jews who continue to support AIPAC and the Israel Lobby despite their very unprogressive support of Israel’s pro-apartheid, pro-ethnic cleansing policies. J Street and Soros support an aggressive U.S. role in the Middle East, they oppose settlement building, and are open to talks with Hamas.

However, it has also recently come out that Soros funds neoconservatives with a history of support for the most racialist elements in Israel. This indicates that his support for the left on policy toward Israel is not strongly principled. Minimally, it indicates that he would accept a Republican government dominated by neoconservatives favoring the most racialist elements in Israel if it managed to contain White populist anger in America. Neoconservative support for pretty much the entire social program of the left, including especially support for massive non-White immigration, is legendary.

A cynic would observe that the lack of effectiveness of J Street to date means that it mainly functions to give Judaism a softer veneer that is consistent with post-racial, multicultural America without having any effective influence on lessening the support of the Israel Lobby for Israel as an apartheid, expansionist, racialist state. Indeed, J Street recently noted “a deep commitment to Israel…[is] interwoven deep in the soul of American Jewish political identity.”

The reality is that American policy toward Israel is determined almost completely by the composition of the Israeli government which is now the most racialist in its history. Simply put, the American Jewish community will not discontinue its support for Israel no matter how racialist it is—collective Jewish interests and all that. Given the demographics of Israel which is increasingly dominated by highly fertile ethnic and religious fanatics, the racialist policies emanating from Israel will continue or get more extreme in the foreseeable future. With all his money, Soros cannot change this even if he wanted to...MORE...LINK
-----

Chris Moore comments:

Beck is a faux-Christian, as are all “Christian” Zionist neocons and Bushcons. Actually, I’ve gotten a sense lately that certain Mormons may have in mind the possibility of running a Judeofascist-like racket themselves in the U.S., but one that wouldn’t be burdened with the racist Israel albatross, nor psychotic Jewish delusions of ruling the world. Stepping into the shoes of the vacated organized Jewish rackets, so to speak.

I wouldn’t recommend it, though. They’d only be setting themselves up for a massive, anti-Mormon pogrom, because when the sh*t hits the fan, and latent-Christian Americans regain their senses (and anti-Pharisaic consciousness), anything with a whiff of Judeofascism on it, Left or Right, “Christian” or Gentile, is going to be fair game.

Why, even the slavering, drunken Judeophile-lefty Christopher Hitchens is backing away from his Jewish masters. Now when a craven, obsequious opportunist like that starts getting cagey and pacing towards the door, the writing is on the wall.

Quasi-governmental, Zionist-Left front group SPLC designates U.S. freedom movement activists suspect "terrorists"

(By Chris Moore) -- The quasi-governmental advisory group to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Jewish-dominated, self-professed "civil rights" organization Southern Poverty Law Center has designated those Americans who take preventive measures against a militarized government's increasing police state abuses to be potential or likely terrorists.

From Carlos Miller at Pixiq.com:

The Southern Poverty Law Center has produced a video to educate police officers about domestic terrorists and cop killers.

And naturally, they include people who videotape cops as potential suspects.

The 12:25 minute video focuses on the "sovereign citizen" movement - described as a "radical, anti-government movement" - which the SPLC further describes below:

The so-called “sovereign citizens” movement — men and women who believe they are exempt from most state and federal laws, regulations and tax codes — is spreading like a prairie fire. While many of these are tax resistors or perpetrators of “paper terrorism” – the filing of nuisance liens and such – some sovereign citizens have demonstrated a willingness to resist police and government authority with violence.

Earlier this year, two Arkansas police officers were killed during a traffic stop involving a father-and-son team of sovereigns, so it is understandable why officers would need to educate themselves about these individuals.

However, the video uses a very broad brush to paint people who have right-wing bumper stickers on their cars as well as people who videotape cops as being potential cop killers.

David Kramer at LewRockwell.com understands exactly why the SPLC wants police state opponents and government dissidents to be labeled as "terrorists": in order to advance the fraudulent "civil rights" organization's crypto-totalitarian agenda:

The leftist Southern Poverty Law Center has produced this video warning government thugs (i.e., cops) against anti-government types—you know, those of us who don’t pledge allegiance to the IRS; don’t support the U.S. government terrorist attacks in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Yemen; don’t support the domestic terrorist attacks by government narcs against people who have the “audacity” to believe they own their own bodies in order to decide what to ingest in them;...At 8:18, cops are warned that some sovereigns, i.e., domestic “terrorists” might try to record (video) their encounters with the police. This is one of many Establishment brainwashing techniques to convince the sheeple that anyone videotaping and then posting on the internet a police abuse scene could be a “terrorist”—i.e., scare people into not doing this as this freedom technique takes on more and more popularity over the coming years.

The SPLC is a prime example of the Judeofascist-Left hard at work in America, and how it uses the trojan horse of "civil rights" to establish Jewish supremacy and hegemony both at home and abroad. The SPLC knows full well the wars being fought by the U.S. in the Mideast are being waged to advance the imperialist neolib/neocon and Jewish Zionst agenda; and it also knows the greatest opposition to the domestic Jewish-supremacist agenda (patterned on the Jewish Bolshevik-dominated early Soviet Union) comes from the freedom movement, authentic conservatives, Christians, and libertarians (authentic being the operative word here, which excludes authoritarian "Christian" Zionists, neocons and subversive Randian "libertarians.")

Just as the Jewish Bolsheviks who were instrumental in instigating and propagating early Communism and Soviet totalitarianism weren't really interested in "social justice" as advertised, (but rather domestic mass murder on behalf of Jewish supremacy), the SPLC is an agency not designed to advance "civil rights," but rather government-imposed, totalitarian Zionist domination of American society -- as a means to simultaneously advance Zionist domination of the Middle East.

In addition to beings self-serving Judeofascist-Left racists and totalitarians, the SPLC leadership is also driven by insatiable greed and swindle. Why, just look at the lifestyle of splendor that SPLC Founder Morris Dees is able to support in the "poverty" racket.

Honestly, who is the real threat to American sovereignty and its traditions of liberty, limited government, freedom, and individual (and civil) rights: those who want to keep a skeptical eye on authoritarian government and its propensity for warmongering and police state abuse, or those who declare skeptics and dissidents to be "terrorists" -- a favorite technique of authoritarian demagogues and totalitarians from Adolph Hitler and his racist Aryan Nazis to Joseph Stalin and his racist Jewish Bolsheviks?

The Devil and George Soros -- who's now courting the Satanic neocons

From:
Soros Courts the Neocons
(Occidental Observer) -- by Kevin MacDonald --

As reported in the Salon, George Soros has paid $150,000 to Randy Scheunemann, a neocon foreign policy figure. Scheunemann was McCain’s foreign policy adviser during the 2008 campaign and is now a top aide of Sarah Palin.

Scheunemann is completely in line on Israel, as is Palin. The Jewish Journal noted that during the campaign, Scheunemann had led the attack on

Obama’s willingness to sit with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Scheunemann also led efforts to pitch the Iraq war to the American public prior to the invasion. . . . Scheunemann is also close to the pro-Israel community. Working with [Trent] Lott, he authored the 1995 legislation that would move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem; a year later, Scheunemann’s advice led Bob Dole — the Republican presidential candidate that year — to pledge to do so. This year, McCain has picked up that pledge.

I came across Scheunemann in writing an article on the neocons and Russia, where it emerged that he was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars by the government of Georgia to use his influence against Russia, a policy that coincided with Soros’ attitudes. Scheunemann was also President of the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, sponsored by Bill Kristols’ Project for a New American Century.

So Soros is much more than the patron saint of the left. Like AIPAC, it pays to play both sides of the aisle in American politics...

Finally, the episode illustrates one of the great strengths of Jewish intellectual and political movements: They provide excellent career opportunities, both economically and professionally. Scheunemann is well connected to the neocon foreign policy establishment—doubtless very lucrative, and his firm has Soros’ Open Society Institute as a client. He’s living well, and his non-Jewish background is definitely an asset because it helps deflect public awareness that neoconservatism is a Jewish movement...MORE...LINK
-------------------------

Chris Moore comments:

Soros also backs J Street, which is the controlled "opposition" to [racist] Zionism within the innately racist organized Jewish community, and thus, not surprisingly, opposes the one state solution.

Glenn Beck and other political Zionism-owned Goy neocons maintain Soros is an anti-Semite, but I'm not buying. He's just another Judeofascist sociopath who seeks to play God -- in Soros' case, actually sees himself as God. This is an obvious characteristic of modern Jewry -- instead of seeing itself as a kind of medium between God and humanity per the Prophets' role in the Bible, it now presumes to see itself as God Himself. Or rather, take His place.

Milton wrote an allegory of this process in Paradise Lost, with Satan, formerly one of God's top angels, and his rebel cohorts orchestrating a coup against God. After being cast into hell as punishment ("Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven"), Satan and his minions quickly go about plotting a way to corrupt God's creation, Adam and Eve.

This, from Wikipedia: Satan's desire to rebel against his creator stems from his unwillingness to accept that all beings don't deserve freedom, declaring the angels "self-begot, self-raised",[7] thereby eliminating God’s authority over them as their creator. Satan is portrayed as charismatic and persuasive. Satan's persuasive powers are first evident when he makes arguments to his angel-followers as to why they should try to overthrow God. He argues that they ought to have equal rights to God and that Heaven is an unfair monarchy, stating, "Who can in reason then or right assume/ Monarchy over such as live by right/ His equals, if in power and splendor less / In freedom equal? or can introduce/ Law and edict on us, who without law/ Err not, much less for this to be our Lord,/ And look for adoration to th' abuse/ Of those imperial titles which assert/ Our being ordained to govern, not to serve?."

I read this as Milton's reference to the Judeofascist rebellion against Christian moral authority under the auspices of freedom, but actually in pursuit of the agenda of creating hell on earth, over which they and their corrupt acolytes can tyrannically reign, as is increasingly the case today.

Of course, God being all powerful, and Christian moral authority being so entrenched in Western civilization, the Judeofascists needed an ally and sponsor to overthrow it, hence their deal with the Devil. This has richly rewarded them (explaining their hugely inordinate wealth and worldly success, and ability to so blatantly get away with theft and crimes against humanity), but which obliges them to corrupt, desecrate, murder, and denigrate in return.

Perhaps that, and not evolutionary biology, explains their wicked ways.

Of course, if there's no God, then there can be no Devil -- and no Judeofascist bargain with the Devil. No wonder they simultaneously foment atheism for their Goy cattle.

"Christian" Zionists, White nationalists, Judeofascists and atheist-materialists vs. Christianity and Western civilization

(By Chris Moore) -- White nationalists are increasingly taking up the problem of Christian Zionism and its deleterious effects on America and the White race. The latest entry on this subject is from Occidental Observer's Rob Lonaker:

Jewish organizations beguile Christians in various ways, including leading them (1) to ignore Jewish mistreatment of Palestinians; (2) to believe Israel’s interests are more important than America’s and are morally sufficient to wage unprovoked wars; and (3) to pay Jews’ travel expenses for aliyah, their immigration to Israel.

Christian Zionists believe that Jews are the primary chosen people of God, Christians being the secondary, and that the elevation of Israel’s interests above all else is a prerequisite to the occurrence of wonderfully desirable end-time events: Armageddon, the “rapture,” the Apocalypse, and the second coming of Christ.

In Matt Parrott’s interview of Kevin MacDonald, both gentlemen lament (at 30:00) the exploitation of Christian Zionists by the Israel Lobby. If indeed the Old Testament represents a blueprint for a Jewish group evolutionary strategy based on a return to worldly power in a Jewish state, it is not surprising that it would contain passages that support Jewish interests...

Lonaker then muses on the best way to bring Christian Zionists to their senses, finally turning to the crypto-Marxist, Christian-hating, militant atheist and secular humanist sociopath Richard Dawkins:

Rather than argue that Christian Zionists have misinterpreted certain Bible passages, why not take a critical, rational approach? Based on its tales of impossibility, its contradictions, and the lack of evidence for all its supernatural claims, the Bible is false. Its historical narrative is replete with inaccuracy, anachronism, and unadulterated balderdash...

Of Poseidon, Thor, Zeus, and Apollo, Richard Dawkins wrote, “We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.”

My parallel: Most Christians are suckered by many Jewish myths in the Bible. Christian Zionists just go a few paragraphs further.

The irony of all of this is that there's a subtext to Christian Zionism that I’ve heard many White nationalists explicitly appeal to as well, going something along the lines of this: "Israel and the Jewish people are essentially in the same position as Whites -- under siege from the dusky hordes -- and White nationalists can learn from the Jewish people about how to survive long-term in a hostile environment."

In this formulation, White nationalists and Jewish nationalists are all “teammates,” just as Christian Zionists and Jewish Zionists are teammates.

The reason all of the above are completely deluded, misguided, and possibly suicidal is that Whites have prospered to their highest levels within the embrace of Western civilization, which always was a multi-cultural enterprise grounded in consciously Jewish-antithesis Christianity.

Whites are shrinking and dying, in part, because they have turned their backs on authentic, Jewish-antithesis Christianity, and are instead following this trajectory:

Christianity (Catholicism) to Western civilization to Protestantism to identification with Jews to insatiable greed, religious narcissism or secular humanism/atheist materialism to near extinction.

The correct path is back towards and ideal variation of Western civilization, one which balances out Catholicism, Protestantism, and any other denomination, and generally keeps itself grounded and united by Christianity, will tolerate other religions so long as they respect Christianity as the ongoing moral authority, but will not tolerate any subversion or attacks from organized Jewry or Islamists (the inciters of which should be summarily repatriated to their spiritual homelands) or any other subversives who seek to overthrow Western civilization, such as money-worshippers, Globalists and Marxists.

Following the Jewish nationalists, whether willfully (Christian Zionism) or implicitly (White nationalism) is a recipe for misery and suicide. Despite being the oldest ongoing racialist-religion on earth, the Jews have a minuscule population for a reason: in their organized state (and often even individually), they’re narcissistic, subversive, insatiably greedy, bigoted, confrontational and generally loathsome, authoritarian, control-freaks -- as are larger and larger numbers of the dying, Jewish-emulating White race. Indeed, modern American society is increasingly warmongering, angry, warped, festering, seething and teeth-gnashing -- all characteristic of the Jewish way of life.

In addition to generally being a miserable way to live, all of this leads to blowback and self-destruction from both internal and external forces, and shrinkage to the point of siege.

But let's not get too long winded. A simpler way of conveying this reality to slow-on-the-uptake Christian Zionists and other similarly deluded souls, including implicitly Jewish nationalist-emulating White nationalists, might be: the Judeofascists are in a deal with the Devil, and following in their footsteps means death.

To comprehend and defeat spiritual evil, which the Judeofascists channel, mandates rejecting not only the "modern" Jewish-emulating way of life, but also rejecting modernistic, sociopathic Marxist and Darwinist "survivalist" models, and simultaneously embracing the spiritually good, traditional, anti-Jewish interpretation of Christianity that built Western civilization.

Chris Moore is editor of LibertarianToday.com and Judeofascism.com